HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 42, 41077-41082, October 17, 2003

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Data Supplement All Versions of this Article: 278/42/41077    most recent M305871200v1 Submit a Letter to Editor Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Arunkumar, A. I. Articles by Chazin, W. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Arunkumar, A. I. Articles by Chazin, W. J. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Independent and Coordinated Functions of Replication Protein A Tandem High Affinity Single-stranded DNA Binding Domains^*,

Alphonse I. Arunkumar , Melissa E. Stauffer , Elena Bochkareva , Alexey Bochkarev  and Walter J. Chazin  ¶

From the Departments of Biochemistry and Physics and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-8725 and the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73190

The initial high affinity binding of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) by replication protein A (RPA) is involved in the tandem domains in the central region of the RPA70 subunit (RPA70AB). However, it was not clear whether the two domains, RPA70A and RPA70B, bind DNA simultaneously or sequentially. Here, using primarily heteronuclear NMR complemented by fluorescence spectroscopy, we have analyzed the binding characteristics of the individual RPA70A and RPA70B domains and compared them with the intact RPA70AB. NMR chemical shift comparisons confirmed that RPA70A and RPA70B tumble independently in solution in the absence of ssDNA. NMR chemical shift perturbations showed that all ssDNA oligomers bind to the same sites as observed in the x-ray crystal structure of RPA70AB complexed to d(C)₈. Titrations using a variety of 5'-mer ssDNA oligomers showed that RPA70A has a 5–10-fold higher affinity for ssDNA than RPA70B. Detailed analysis of ssDNA binding to RPA70A revealed that all DNA sequences interact in a similar mode. Fluorescence binding measurements with a variety of 8–10'-mer DNA sequences showed that RPA70AB interacts with DNA with 100-fold higher affinity than the isolated domains. Calculation of the theoretical "linkage effect" from the structure of RPA70AB suggests that the high overall affinity for ssDNA is a byproduct of the covalent attachment of the two domains via a short flexible tether, which increases the effective local concentration. Taken together, our data are consistent with a sequential model of DNA binding by RPA according to which RPA70A binds the majority of DNA first and subsequent loading of RPA70B domain is facilitated by the linkage effect.

Received for publication, June 4, 2003 , and in revised form, July 24, 2003.

^* This work was supported by U. S. National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 GM65484 (to W. J. C.) and Grant RO1 GM61192 (to A. B.). Use of core facilities was supported in part by the Vanderbilt Center for Molecular Toxicology (NIH P30 ES00267) and the Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center (NIH P30 CA68485). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplementary figure S1 showing the ¹H-¹⁵N HSQC spectrum of RPA70AB with the backbone assignments.

^¶ To whom correspondence should be addressed: Depts. of Biochemistry and Physics, Center for Structural Biology, 5140 BIOSCI/MRBIII, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232-8725. Tel.: 615-936-2210; Fax: 615-936-2211; E-mail: walter.chazin{at}vanderbilt.edu.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. M. Dickson, Y. Krasikova, P. Pestryakov, O. Lavrik, and M. S. Wold Essential functions of the 32 kDa subunit of yeast replication protein A Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2009; 37(7): 2313 - 2326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Stewart, A. S. Miller, J. L. Campbell, and R. A. Bambara Dynamic Removal of Replication Protein A by Dna2 Facilitates Primer Cleavage during Okazaki Fragment Processing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2008; 283(46): 31356 - 31365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. K. Binz and M. S. Wold Regulatory Functions of the N-terminal Domain of the 70-kDa Subunit of Replication Protein A (RPA) J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2008; 283(31): 21559 - 21570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. J. Haring, A. C. Mason, S. K. Binz, and M. S. Wold Cellular Functions of Human RPA1: MULTIPLE ROLES OF DOMAINS IN REPLICATION, REPAIR, AND CHECKPOINTS J. Biol. Chem., July 4, 2008; 283(27): 19095 - 19111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D. Robertson, E. M. Warren, H. Zhang, D. B. Friedman, J. W. Lary, J. L. Cole, A. V. Tutter, J. C. Walter, E. Fanning, and B. F. Eichman Domain Architecture and Biochemical Characterization of Vertebrate Mcm10 J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3338 - 3348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Keyamura, N. Fujikawa, T. Ishida, S. Ozaki, M. Su'etsugu, K. Fujimitsu, W. Kagawa, S. Yokoyama, H. Kurumizaka, and T. Katayama The interaction of DiaA and DnaA regulates the replication cycle in E. coli by directly promoting ATP DnaA-specific initiation complexes Genes & Dev., August 15, 2007; 21(16): 2083 - 2099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Fanning, V. Klimovich, and A. R. Nager A dynamic model for replication protein A (RPA) function in DNA processing pathways Nucleic Acids Res., September 10, 2006; 34(15): 4126 - 4137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Ishibashi, S. Kimura, and K. Sakaguchi A Higher Plant Has Three Different Types of RPA Heterotrimeric Complex J. Biochem., January 1, 2006; 139(1): 99 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Liu, M. Kvaratskhelia, S. Hess, Y. Qu, and Y. Zou Modulation of Replication Protein A Function by Its Hyperphosphorylation-induced Conformational Change Involving DNA Binding Domain B J. Biol. Chem., September 23, 2005; 280(38): 32775 - 32783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Stauffer and W. J. Chazin Structural Mechanisms of DNA Replication, Repair, and Recombination J. Biol. Chem., July 23, 2004; 279(30): 30915 - 30918. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Stauffer and W. J. Chazin Physical Interaction between Replication Protein A and Rad51 Promotes Exchange on Single-stranded DNA J. Biol. Chem., June 11, 2004; 279(24): 25638 - 25645. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. H. Yoo, E. Bochkareva, A. Bochkarev, T.-C. Mou, and D. M. Gray 2'-O-methyl-modified phosphorothioate antisense oligonucleotides have reduced non-specific effects in vitro Nucleic Acids Res., April 2, 2004; 32(6): 2008 - 2016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. E. Pestryakov, D. Y. Khlimankov, E. Bochkareva, A. Bochkarev, and O. I. Lavrik Human replication protein A (RPA) binds a primer-template junction in the absence of its major ssDNA-binding domains Nucleic Acids Res., March 26, 2004; 32(6): 1894 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]