|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M209554200 on November 8, 2002
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 278, Issue 8, 6120-6127, February 21, 2003
Recognition and Hydrolysis of Noncrystalline Cellulose*
Alisdair B.
Boraston §¶,
Emily
Kwan § ,
Patrick
Chiu§,
R. Antony J.
Warren , and
Douglas G.
Kilburn §
From The Protein Engineering Network of Centres of
Excellence, PENCE Inc., National Business Centre, Edmonton, Alberta T6G
2S2, Canada, the Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3,
Canada, and the § Biotechnology Laboratory, University of
British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
Cellulase Cel5A from alkalophilic
Bacillus sp. 1139 contains a family 17 carbohydrate-binding
module (BspCBM17) and a family 28 CBM
(BspCBM28) in tandem. The two modules have significantly similar amino acid sequences, but amino acid residues essential for
binding are not conserved. BspCBM28 was obtained as a
discrete polypeptide by engineering the cel5A gene.
BspCBM17 could not be obtained as a discrete polypeptide,
so a family 17 CBM from endoglucanase Cel5A of Clostridium
cellulovorans, CcCBM17, was used to compare the
binding characteristics of the two families of CBM. Both
CcCBM17 and BspCBM28 recognized two classes of
binding sites on amorphous cellulose: a high affinity site
(Ka ~1 × 106
M 1) and a low affinity site
(Ka ~2 × 104
M 1). They did not compete for binding to the
high affinity sites, suggesting that they bound at different sites on
the cellulose. A polypeptide, BspCBM17/CBM28, comprising
the tandem CBMs from Cel5A, bound to amorphous cellulose with a
significantly higher affinity than the sum of the affinities of
CcCBM17 and BspCBM28, indicating cooperativity
between the linked CBMs. Cel5A mutants were constructed that were
defective in one or both of the CBMs. The mutants differed from the
wild-type enzyme in the amounts and sizes of the soluble products
produced from amorphous cellulose. This suggests that either the CBMs
can modify the action of the catalytic module of Cel5A or that they
target the enzyme to areas of the cellulose that differ in
susceptibility to hydrolysis.
*
This work was supported by the Natural Sciences and
Engineering Research Council and the Protein Engineering Network
Centres of Excellence Research Council of Canada (to D. G. K.).The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
"advertisement" in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
¶
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of
Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, P. O. Box 3055 STN CSC, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3P6, Canada. Tel.:
250-721-7076; Fax: 250-721-8855; E-mail: boraston@uvic.ca.
Copyright © 2003 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Montanier, A. L. van Bueren, C. Dumon, J. E. Flint, M. A. Correia, J. A. Prates, S. J. Firbank, R. J. Lewis, G. G. Grondin, M. G. Ghinet, et al.
Evidence that family 35 carbohydrate binding modules display conserved specificity but divergent function
PNAS,
March 3, 2009;
106(9):
3065 - 3070.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Bae, S. Ohene-Adjei, S. Kocherginskaya, R. I. Mackie, M. A. Spies, I. K. O. Cann, and S. K. Nair
Molecular Basis for the Selectivity and Specificity of Ligand Recognition by the Family 16 Carbohydrate-binding Modules from Thermoanaerobacterium polysaccharolyticum ManA
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 2, 2008;
283(18):
12415 - 12425.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. W. Blake, L. McCartney, J. E. Flint, D. N. Bolam, A. B. Boraston, H. J. Gilbert, and J. P. Knox
Understanding the Biological Rationale for the Diversity of Cellulose-directed Carbohydrate-binding Modules in Prokaryotic Enzymes
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 29, 2006;
281(39):
29321 - 29329.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Henshaw, A. Horne-Bitschy, A. L. van Bueren, V. A. Money, D. N. Bolam, M. Czjzek, N. A. Ekborg, R. M. Weiner, S. W. Hutcheson, G. J. Davies, et al.
Family 6 Carbohydrate Binding Modules in beta-Agarases Display Exquisite Selectivity for the Non-reducing Termini of Agarose Chains
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 23, 2006;
281(25):
17099 - 17107.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Shoseyov, Z. Shani, and I. Levy
Carbohydrate Binding Modules: Biochemical Properties and Novel Applications
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
June 1, 2006;
70(2):
283 - 295.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Boraston, M. Healey, J. Klassen, E. Ficko-Blean, A. L. van Bueren, and V. Law
A Structural and Functional Analysis of {alpha}-Glucan Recognition by Family 25 and 26 Carbohydrate-binding Modules Reveals a Conserved Mode of Starch Recognition
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 6, 2006;
281(1):
587 - 598.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Taylor, A. Goyal, C. I. P. D. Guerreiro, J. A. M. Prates, V. A. Money, N. Ferry, C. Morland, A. Planas, J. A. Macdonald, R. V. Stick, et al.
How Family 26 Glycoside Hydrolases Orchestrate Catalysis on Different Polysaccharides: STRUCTURE AND ACTIVITY OF A CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM LICHENASE, CtLic26A
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 23, 2005;
280(38):
32761 - 32767.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|