Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M503325200 on August 4, 2005

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 39, 33311-33317, September 30, 2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
280/39/33311    most recent
M503325200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharyya, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lahue, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharyya, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lahue, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Srs2 Helicase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Selectively Unwinds Triplet Repeat DNA*{boxs}

Saumitri Bhattacharyya and Robert S. Lahue1

From the Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-6805

Trinucleotide repeat expansions are the mutational cause of at least 15 genetic diseases. In vitro, single-stranded triplet repeat DNA forms highly stable hairpins, depending on repeat sequence, and a strong correlation exists between hairpin-forming ability and the risk of expansion in vivo. Hairpins are viewed, therefore, as likely mutagenic precursors to expansions. If a helicase unwinds the hairpin, it would be less likely to expand. Previous work indicated that yeast Srs2 DNA helicase selectively blocks expansions in vivo (Bhattacharyya, S., and Lahue, R. S. (2004) Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 7324–7330). For example, srs2 mutants, including an ATPase-defective point mutant, exhibit substantially higher expansion rates than wild type controls. In contrast, mutation of another helicase gene, SGS1, had little effect on expansion rates. These findings prompted the idea that Srs2 might selectively unwind triplet repeat hairpins. In this study, DNA helicase assays were performed with purified Srs2, Sgs1, and Escherichia coli UvrD (DNA helicase II). Srs2 shows substantially faster unwinding than Sgs1 or UvrD on partial duplex substrates containing (CTG)·(CTG) sequences, provided that Srs2 encounters the triplet repeat DNA immediately on entering the duplex. Srs2 was also faster at unwinding (CAG)·(CAG)- and (CCG)·(CCG)-containing substrates and an intramolecular (CTG)·(CTG) hairpin. In contrast, all three enzymes unwind about equally well control substrates with either Watson-Crick base pairs or mismatched substrates with non-CNG repeats. Overall, the selective unwinding activity of Srs2 on triplet repeat hairpin DNA helps explain the genetic evidence that Srs2, not the RecQ homolog Sgs1, is a preferred helicase for preventing expansions.


Received for publication, March 25, 2005 , and in revised form, August 3, 2005.

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01 GM GM61961 (to R. S. L.), by National Institutes of Health Training Grant T32 CA09746 (to S. B.), and by NCI, National Institutes of Health Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA36727 (to the Eppley Institute). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

{boxs} The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental graphs of the data for Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Allied Diseases, Box 986805, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-6805. Tel.: 402-559-4619; Fax: 402-559-8270; E-mail: rlahue{at}unmc.edu.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
G.-F. Richard, A. Kerrest, and B. Dujon
Comparative Genomics and Molecular Dynamics of DNA Repeats in Eukaryotes
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., December 1, 2008; 72(4): 686 - 727.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Dhar and R. S. Lahue
Rapid unwinding of triplet repeat hairpins by Srs2 helicase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(10): 3366 - 3373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
D. L. Daee, T. Mertz, and R. S. Lahue
Postreplication Repair Inhibits CAG {middle dot} CTG Repeat Expansions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2007; 27(1): 102 - 110.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement