![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 280, Issue 8, 6682-6691, February 25, 2005
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

From the Department of Experimental Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec 7, Brno 656 53, Czech Republic
Several signaling pathways that monitor the dynamic state of the cell converge on the tumor suppressor p53. The ability of p53 to process these signals and exert a dynamic downstream response in the form of cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis is crucial for preventing tumor development. This p53 function is abrogated by p53 gene mutations leading to alteration of protein conformation. Hsp90 has been implicated in regulating both wild-type and mutant p53 conformations, and Hsp90 antagonists are effective for the therapy of some human tumors. Using cell lines that contain human tumor-derived temperature-sensitive p53 mutants we show that Hsp90 is required for both stabilization and reactivation of mutated p53 at the permissive temperature. A temperature decrease to 32 °C causes conversion to a protein conformation that is capable of inducing expression of MDM2, leading to reduction of reactivated p53 levels by negative feedback. Mutant reactivation is enhanced by simultaneous treatment with agents that stabilize the reactivated protein and is blocked by geldanamycin, a specific inhibitor of Hsp90 activity, indicating that Hsp90 antagonist therapy and therapies that act to reactivate mutant p53 will be incompatible. In contrast, Hsp90 is not required for maintaining wild-type p53 or for stabilizing wild-type p53 after treatment with chemotherapeutic agents, indicating that Hsp90 therapy might synergize with conventional therapies in patients with wild-type p53. Our data demonstrate the importance of the precise characterization of the interaction between p53 mutants and stress proteins, which may shed valuable information for fighting cancer via the p53 tumor suppressor pathway.
Received for publication, November 11, 2004 , and in revised form, December 21, 2004.
* This work was supported by Grant NC7131-3 from the Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic and Grant 301/02/0831 from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 420-543-133-303; Fax: 420-541-211-169, e-mail: vojtesek{at}mou.cz.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Sasaki, L. Nie, and C. G. Maki MDM2 Binding Induces a Conformational Change in p53 That Is Opposed by Heat-shock Protein 90 and Precedes p53 Proteasomal Degradation J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 14626 - 14634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Butler and S. N. Loh Folding and misfolding mechanisms of the p53 DNA binding domain at physiological temperature Protein Sci., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2457 - 2465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Yin, X. Li, Y. Meng, R. L. Finley Jr., W. Sakr, H. Yang, N. Reddy, and S. Sheng Tumor-suppressive Maspin Regulates Cell Response to Oxidative Stress by Direct Interaction with Glutathione S-Transferase J. Biol. Chem., October 14, 2005; 280(41): 34985 - 34996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |