Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M603212200 on May 23, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 30, 20673-20679, July 28, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/30/20673    most recent
M603212200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gurevitz, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Gurevitz, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Direct Evidence That Receptor Site-4 of Sodium Channel Gating Modifiers Is Not Dipped in the Phospholipid Bilayer of Neuronal Membranes*

Lior Cohen{ddagger}, Nicolas Gilles§, Izhar Karbat{ddagger}, Nitza Ilan{ddagger}, Dalia Gordon{ddagger}1, and Michael Gurevitz{ddagger}2

From the {ddagger}Department of Plant Sciences, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv 69978, Tel-Aviv, Israel and the §Commissariat à l'Energie Atomique, Department d'Ingenierie et d'Etudes des Proteines, C.E. Saclay, F-91191 Gif Sur Yvette Cedex, France

In a recent note to Nature, R. MacKinnon has raised the possibility that potassium channel gating modifiers are able to partition in the phospholipid bilayer of neuronal membranes and that by increasing their partial concentration adjacent to their receptor, they affect channel function with apparent high affinity (Lee and MacKinnon (2004) Nature 430, 232–235). This suggestion was adopted by Smith et al. (Smith, J. J., Alphy, S., Seibert, A. L., and Blumenthal, K. M. (2005) J. Biol. Chem. 280, 11127–11133), who analyzed the partitioning of sodium channel modifiers in liposomes. They found that certain modifiers were able to partition in these artificial membranes, and on this basis, they have extrapolated that scorpion beta-toxins interact with their channel receptor in a similar mechanism as that proposed by MacKinnon. Since this hypothesis has actually raised a new conception, we examined it in binding assays using a number of pharmacologically distinct scorpion beta-toxins and insect and mammalian neuronal membrane preparations, as well as by analyzing the rate by which the toxin effect on gating of Drosophila DmNav1 and rat brain rNav1.2a develops. We show that in general, scorpion beta-toxins do not partition in neuronal membranes and that in the case in which a depressant beta-toxin partitions in insect neuronal membranes, this partitioning is unrelated to its interaction with the receptor site and the effect on the gating properties of the sodium channel. These results negate the hypothesis that the high affinity of beta-toxins for sodium channels is gained by their ability to partition in the phospholipid bilayer and clearly indicate that the receptor site for scorpion beta-toxins is accessible to the extracellular solvent.


Received for publication, April 4, 2006 , and in revised form, May 9, 2006.

* This research was supported by United States-Israel Binational Agricultural Research and Development Grant IS-3480-03 (to M. G. and D. G.); by Israeli Science Foundation, Grants 733/01 (to M. G.) and 1008/05 (to D. G.); and by the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development Grant G-770-242.1/2002 (to D. G.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 972-3-6409844; Fax: 972-3-6406100; E-mail: dgordon{at}post.tau.ac.il. 2 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 972-3-6409844; Fax: 972-3-6406100; E-mail: mamgur{at}post.tau.ac.il.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JGPHome page
M. Milescu, J. Vobecky, S. H. Roh, S. H. Kim, H. J. Jung, J. I. Kim, and K. J. Swartz
Tarantula Toxins Interact with Voltage Sensors within Lipid Membranes
J. Gen. Physiol., October 29, 2007; 130(5): 497 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. J. Smith, T. R. Cummins, S. Alphy, and K. M. Blumenthal
Molecular Interactions of the Gating Modifier Toxin ProTx-II with Nav1.5: IMPLIED EXISTENCE OF A NOVEL TOXIN BINDING SITE COUPLED TO ACTIVATION
J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2007; 282(17): 12687 - 12697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement