HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 30, 21173-21182, July 28, 2006

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Data All Versions of this Article: 281/30/21173    most recent M510757200v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhu, D. Articles by Snead, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zhu, D. Articles by Snead, M. L. Social Bookmarking                      What's this?

Altering Biomineralization by Protein Design^*

From the University of Southern California, Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, Los Angeles, California 90033

To create a bioceramic with unique materials properties, biomineralization exploits cells to create a tissue-specific protein matrix to control the crystal habit, timing, and position of the mineral phase. The biomineralized covering of vertebrate teeth is enamel, a distinctive tissue of ectodermal origin that is collagen-free. In forming enamel, amelogenin is the abundant protein that undergoes self-assembly to contribute to a matrix that guides its own replacement by mineral. Conserved domains in amelogenin suggest their importance to biomineralization. We used gene targeting in mice to replace native amelogenin with one of two engineered amelogenins. Replacement changed enamel organization by altering protein-to-crystallite interactions and crystallite stacking while diminishing the ability of the ameloblast to interact with the matrix. These data demonstrate that ameloblasts must continuously interact with the developing matrix to provide amelogenin-specific protein to protein, protein to mineral, and protein to membrane interactions critical to biomineralization and enamel architecture while suggesting that mutations within conserved amelogenin domains could account for enamel variations preserved in the fossil record.

Received for publication, October 3, 2005 , and in revised form, May 15, 2006.

^* The work was supported by United States Public Health Service, NIDCR, National Institutes of Health Grants DE 13045 (to M. L. S.) and DE13404 (to M. L. P.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. 1-4 and Table 1.

¹ To whom correspondence should be addressed: University of Southern California, Center for Craniofacial Molecular Biology, 2250 Alcazar St., CSA 142, Los Angeles CA 90033. Tel.: 323-442-3178; Fax: 323-442-2981; E-mail: mlsnead{at}usc.edu.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W. J. Shaw, K. Ferris, B. Tarasevich, and J. L. Larson The Structure and Orientation of the C-Terminus of LRAP Biophys. J., April 15, 2008; 94(8): 3247 - 3257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Lakshminarayanan, D. Fan, C. Du, and J. Moradian-Oldak The Role of Secondary Structure in the Entropically Driven Amelogenin Self-Assembly Biophys. J., November 15, 2007; 93(10): 3664 - 3674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.W. Gibson, Z.A. Yuan, Y. Li, B. Daly, C. Suggs, M.A. Aragon, F. Alawi, A.B. Kulkarni, and J.T. Wright Transgenic Mice that Express Normal and Mutated Amelogenins J. Dent. Res., April 1, 2007; 86(4): 331 - 335. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]