Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M600579200 on August 4, 2006

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 40, 29479-29490, October 6, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/40/29479    most recent
M600579200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Mulder, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liu, G.
Right arrow Articles by Mulder, K. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Requirement of Smad3 and CREB-1 in Mediating Transforming Growth Factor-beta (TGFbeta) Induction of TGFbeta3 Secretion*

Guangming Liu, Wei Ding, Jill Neiman, and Kathleen M. Mulder1

From the Department of Pharmacology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033

Because increased transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta) production by tumor cells contributes to cancer progression through paracrine mechanisms, identification of critical points that can be targeted to block TGFbeta production is important. Previous studies have identified the precise signaling components and promoter elements required for TGFbeta induction of TGFbeta1 expression in epithelial cells (Yue, J., and Mulder, K. M. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 30765–30773). To determine how regulation of TGFbeta3 expression differs from that of TGFbeta1, we identified the precise signaling pathways and transcription factor-binding sites that are required for TGFbeta3 gene expression. By using mutational analysis in electrophoresis mobility shift assays (EMSAs), we demonstrated that the c-AMP-responsive element (CRE) site in the TGFbeta3 promoter was required for TGFbeta-inducible TGFbeta3 expression. Electrophoresis mobility supershift assays indicated that CRE-binding protein 1 (CREB1) and Smad3 were the major components present in this TGFbeta-inducible complex. Furthermore, by using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we demonstrated that CREB-1, ATF-2, and c-Jun bound constitutively at the TGFbeta3 promoter (–100 to +1), whereas Smad3 bound at this site only after TGFbeta stimulation. In addition, inhibition of JNK and p38 suppressed TGFbeta induction of TGFbeta3 transactivation, whereas inhibition of ERK and protein kinase A had no effect. Small interfering RNA-CREB1 and small interfering RNA-Smad3 significantly inhibited TGFbeta stimulation of TGFbeta3 promoter reporter activity and TGFbeta3 production. Our results indicate that TGFbeta activation of the TGFbeta3 promoter CRE site, which leads to TGFbeta3 production, is required for TGFbetaRII, JNK, p38, and Smad3 but was independent of protein kinase A, ERK, and Smad4.


Received for publication, January 19, 2006 , and in revised form, August 2, 2006.

* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants CA90765, CA92889, and CA100239 and Department of Defense Award DAMD17-03-1-0287 (to K. M. M.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology, Penn State College of Medicine, 500 University Dr., Hershey, PA 17033. Tel.: 717-531-6789; Fax: 717-531-5013; E-mail: kmm15{at}psu.edu.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D.-W. Lin, I.-C. Chang, A. Tseng, M.-L. Wu, C.-H. Chen, C. A. Patenaude, M. D. Layne, and S.-F. Yet
Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Up-regulates Cysteine-rich Protein 2 in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells via Activating Transcription Factor 2
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2008; 283(22): 15003 - 15014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
H. P. Gaide Chevronnay, P. B. Cornet, D. Delvaux, P. Lemoine, P. J. Courtoy, P. Henriet, and E. Marbaix
Opposite Regulation of Transforming Growth Factors-{beta}2 and -{beta}3 Expression in the Human Endometrium
Endocrinology, March 1, 2008; 149(3): 1015 - 1025.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Q. Jin, W. Ding, and K. M. Mulder
Requirement for the Dynein Light Chain km23-1 in a Smad2-dependent Transforming Growth Factor-beta Signaling Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2007; 282(26): 19122 - 19132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
B. S. Yoon, R. Pogue, D. A. Ovchinnikov, I. Yoshii, Y. Mishina, R. R. Behringer, and K. M. Lyons
BMPs regulate multiple aspects of growth-plate chondrogenesis through opposing actions on FGF pathways
Development, December 1, 2006; 133(23): 4667 - 4678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement