![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 281, Issue 8, 5050-5057, February 24, 2006
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PS2
PS Integrins That Affect Ligand Affinity*
1


||
From the
Departments of
Molecular and Cellular Biology, ||Biochemistry, and ¶Medicine, Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Arizona 85724 and the
Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
We developed a ligand-mimetic antibody Fab fragment specific for Drosophila
PS2
PS integrins to probe the ligand binding affinities of these invertebrate receptors. TWOW-1 was constructed by inserting a fragment of the extracellular matrix protein Tiggrin into the H-CDR3 of the
v
3 ligand-mimetic antibody WOW-1. The specificity of
PS2
PS binding to TWOW-1 was demonstrated by numerous tests used for other integrin-ligand interactions. Binding was decreased in the presence of EDTA or RGD peptides and by mutation of the TWOW-1 RGD sequence or the
PS metal ion-dependent adhesion site (MIDAS) motif. TWOW-1 binding was increased by mutations in the
PS2 membrane-proximal cytoplasmic GFFNR sequence or by exposure to Mn2+. Although Mn2+ is sometimes assumed to promote maximal integrin activity, TWOW-1 binding in Mn2+ could be increased further by the
PS2 GFFNR
GFANA mutation. A mutation in the
PS I domain (
PS-b58; V409D) greatly increased ligand binding affinity, explaining the increased cell spreading mediated by
PS2
PS-b58. Further mutagenesis of this residue suggested that Val-409 normally stabilizes the closed head conformation. Mutations that potentially reduce interaction of the integrin
subunit plexin-semaphorin-integrin (PSI) and stalk domains have been shown to have activating properties. We found that complete deletion of the
PS PSI domain enhanced TWOW-1 binding. Moreover the PSI domain is dispensable for at least some other integrin functions because
PS-
PSI displayed an enhanced ability to mediate cell spreading. These studies establish a means to evaluate mechanisms and consequences of integrin affinity modulation in a tractable model genetic system.
Received for publication, August 4, 2005 , and in revised form, December 21, 2005.
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01GM42474 (to D. L. B.) and R01HL56595 (to S. J. S.) and American Cancer Society Grant 5P30CA023074 (to D. M.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental data.
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Arizona Cancer Center, Rm. 0977, 1515 N. Campbell Ave., Tucson, AZ 85724. Tel.: 520-621-3869; Fax: 520-626-3764; E-mail: tbunch{at}u.arizona.edu.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. L. Helsten, T. A. Bunch, H. Kato, J. Yamanouchi, S. H. Choi, A. L. Jannuzi, C. C. Feral, M. H. Ginsberg, D. L. Brower, and S. J. Shattil Differences in Regulation of Drosophila and Vertebrate Integrin Affinity by Talin Mol. Biol. Cell, August 1, 2008; 19(8): 3589 - 3598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |