![]()
|
|
||||||||
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 13, 9825-9833, March 30, 2007
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
54-RNA Polymerase*
1
2



3
From the
Divisions of
Biology and
Molecular Biosciences, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom
Transcriptional initiation invariably involves the transition from a closed RNA polymerase (RNAP) promoter complex to a transcriptional competent open complex. Activators of the bacterial
54-RNAP are AAA+ proteins that couple ATP hydrolysis to restructure the
54-RNAP promoter complex. Structures of the
54 activator PspF AAA+ domain (PspF1275) bound to
54 show two loop structures proximal to
54 as follows: the
54 contacting the GAFTGA loop 1 structure and loop 2 that classifies
54 activators as pre-sensor 1
-hairpin AAA+ proteins. We report activities for PspF1275 mutated in the AAA+ conserved sensor I threonine/asparagine motif (PspF1275T148A, PspF1275N149A, and PspF1275N149S) within the second region of homology. We show that sensor I asparagine plays a direct role in ATP hydrolysis. However, low hydrolysis rates are sufficient for functional output in vitro. In contrast, PspF1275T148A has severe defects at the distinct step of
54 promoter restructuring. This defect is not because of the failure of PspF1275T148A to stably engage with the closed
54 promoter, indicating (i) an important role in ATP hydrolysis-associated motions during energy coupling for remodeling and (ii) distinguishing PspF1275T148A from PspF1275 variants involved in signaling to the GAFTGA loop 1, which fail to stably engage with the promoter. Activities of loop 2 PspF1275 variants are similar to those of PspF1275T148A suggesting a functional signaling link between Thr148 and loop 2. In PspF1275 this link relies on the conserved nucleotide state-dependent interaction between the Walker B residue Glu108 and Thr148. We propose that hydrolysis is relayed via Thr148 to loop 2 creating motions that provide mechanical force to the GAFTGA loop 1 that contacts
54.
Received for publication, December 18, 2006 , and in revised form, January 19, 2007.
* This work was supported in part by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
2 Recipient of EMBO Fellowship ALTF 387-2005.
1 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 44-207-5945366; Fax: 44-207-5842056; E-mail: j.schumacher{at}imperial.ac.uk. 3 To whom correspondence may be addressed. Tel.: 44-207-5945422; Fax: 44-207-5945419; E-mail: m.buck{at}imperial.ac.uk.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. M. Arraiano, J. Bamford, H. Brussow, A. J. Carpousis, V. Pelicic, K. Pfluger, P. Polard, and J. Vogel Recent Advances in the Expression, Evolution, and Dynamics of Prokaryotic Genomes J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2007; 189(17): 6093 - 6100. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |