Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.C600315200 on January 11, 2007

J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 282, Issue 8, 5106-5110, February 23, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Data
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
282/8/5106    most recent
C600315200v1
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rotwein, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, E. M.
Right arrow Articles by Rotwein, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Selective Control of Skeletal Muscle Differentiation by Akt1*Formula

Elizabeth M. Wilson and Peter Rotwein1

From the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt pathway plays a central role in growth, development, and metabolism in both normal and neoplastic cells. In skeletal muscle, Akt has been implicated in regulating regeneration and hypertrophy and in counteracting atrophy. Here we provide evidence that Akt1 and not Akt2 is essential for muscle differentiation. Using a robust model of MyoD-mediated muscle development, in which dominant-negative Akt blocked differentiation, we show that targeted loss of Akt1 was equally inhibitory. Selective elimination of Akt1 had no effect on myoblast viability or proliferation but prevented differentiation by impairing the transcriptional actions of MyoD. In contrast, knockdown of Akt2 had no effect on myoblast survival or differentiation and minimally inhibited MyoD-regulated transcription. Our results define isoform-specific Akt-regulated signaling pathways in muscle cells that act through Akt1 to sustain muscle gene activation and promote differentiation.


Received for publication, December 20, 2006 , and in revised form, January 10, 2007.

* These studies were supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 DK42748 to (P. R.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

Formula The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains a supplemental figure.

1 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Rd., Mail code L224, Portland, OR 97239. Tel.: 503-494-0536; Fax: 503-494-8393; E-mail: rotweinp{at}ohsu.edu.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
V. C. Foletta, M. J. Prior, N. Stupka, K. Carey, D. H. Segal, S. Jones, C. Swinton, S. Martin, D. Cameron-Smith, and K. R. Walder
NDRG2, a novel regulator of myoblast proliferation, is regulated by anabolic and catabolic factors
J. Physiol., April 1, 2009; 587(7): 1619 - 1634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
A. Mukherjee and P. Rotwein
Akt promotes BMP2-mediated osteoblast differentiation and bone development
J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2009; 122(5): 716 - 726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
A. K. Peter, C. Y. Ko, M. H. Kim, N. Hsu, N. Ouchi, S. Rhie, Y. Izumiya, L. Zeng, K. Walsh, and R. H. Crosbie
Myogenic Akt signaling upregulates the utrophin-glycoprotein complex and promotes sarcolemma stability in muscular dystrophy
Hum. Mol. Genet., January 15, 2009; 18(2): 318 - 327.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
H. Ren, P. Yin, and C. Duan
IGFBP-5 regulates muscle cell differentiation by binding to IGF-II and switching on the IGF-II auto-regulation loop
J. Cell Biol., September 8, 2008; 182(5): 979 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
A. Mukherjee and P. Rotwein
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-5 Inhibits Osteoblast Differentiation and Skeletal Growth by Blocking Insulin-Like Growth Factor Actions
Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1238 - 1250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
A. Mukherjee, E. M. Wilson, and P. Rotwein
Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF) Binding Protein-5 Blocks Skeletal Muscle Differentiation by Inhibiting IGF Actions
Mol. Endocrinol., January 1, 2008; 22(1): 206 - 215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement