|
Originally published In Press as doi:10.1074/jbc.M708789200 on November 27, 2007
J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 283, Issue 4, 2286-2296, January 25, 2008
The Regulatory Element in the 3'-Untranslated Region of Human Papillomavirus 16 Inhibits Expression by Binding CUG-binding Protein 1*
Rafal Goraczniak and
Samuel I. Gunderson1
From the
Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854
The 3'-untranslated regions (UTRs) of human papillomavirus 16 (HPV16) and bovine papillomavirus 1 (BPV1) contain a negative regulatory element (NRE) that inhibits viral late gene expression. The BPV1 NRE consists of a single 9-nucleotide (nt) U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP) base pairing site (herein called a U1 binding site) that via U1 snRNP binding leads to inhibition of the late poly(A) site. The 79-nt HPV16 NRE is far more complicated, consisting of 4 overlapping very weak U1 binding sites followed by a poorly understood GU-rich element (GRE). We undertook a molecular dissection of the HPV16 GRE and identify via UV cross-linking, RNA affinity chromatography, and mass spectrometry that is bound by the CUG-binding protein 1 (CUGBP1). Reporter assays coupled with knocking down CUGBP1 levels by small interfering RNA and Dox-regulated shRNA, demonstrate CUGBP1 is inhibitory in vivo. CUGBP1 is the first GRE-binding protein to have RNA interfering knockdown evidence in support of its role in vivo. Several fine-scale GRE mutations that inactivate GRE activity in vivo and GRE binding to CUGBP1 in vitro are identified. The CUGBP1·GRE complex has no activity on its own but specifically synergizes with weak U1 binding sites to inhibit expression in vivo. No synergy is seen if the U1 binding sites are made weaker by a 1-nt down-mutation or made stronger by a 1-nt up-mutation, underscoring that the GRE operates only on weak sites. Interestingly, inhibition occurs at multiple levels, in particular at the level of poly(A) site activity, nuclear-cytoplasmic export, and translation of the mRNA. Implications for understanding the HPV16 life cycle are discussed.
Received for publication, October 24, 2007
, and in revised form, November 26, 2007.
* This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants RO1 GM057286 and R21 CA119934 (to S. I. G) and The New Jersey State Commission on Cancer Research Grant 05-2004-CCR-EO (to R. G.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement"in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The on-line version of this article (available at http://www.jbc.org) contains supplemental Figs. S1-S4.
1 To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 732-445-1016; Fax: 732-445-4213; E-mail: gunderson{at}biology.rutgers.edu.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Z. Salem, A. Garcia-Maruniak, V.-U. Lietze, J. E. Maruniak, and D. G. Boucias
Analysis of transcripts from predicted open reading frames of Musca domestica salivary gland hypertrophy virus
J. Gen. Virol.,
May 1, 2009;
90(5):
1270 - 1280.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mole, S. G. Milligan, and S. V. Graham
Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E2 Protein Transcriptionally Activates the Promoter of a Key Cellular Splicing Factor, SF2/ASF
J. Virol.,
January 1, 2009;
83(1):
357 - 367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|