|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Papers In Press, published online ahead of print September 11, 2000
Pharmacology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06536-0812
Corresponding Author: henrik.dohlman{at}yale.edu
Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS proteins) constitute a large family of G protein-binding proteins. All RGS proteins contain a conserved core domain that can accelerate G protein GTPase activity. In addition, many family members contain a unique N-terminal domain of unknown function. Here, we demonstrate that the RGS protein in yeast, Sst2, is proteolytically processed in vivo to yield separate but functional N-terminal and RGS core domain fragments. In whole cell lysates, the full length SST2 product (82 kDa) as well as a prominent 36 kDa species are specifically recognized by antibodies against the C-terminus of the Sst2 protein. Purification and chemical sequencing of the 36 kDa species revealed cleavage sites after Ser-414 and Ser-416, just preceding the region of RGS homology. Expression of a mutationally truncated form of the protein (C-Sst2) could not restore function to an sst2
J. Biol. Chem, 10.1074/jbc.M005751200
Submitted on June 30, 2000
Accepted on September 11, 2000
Endoproteolytic processing of Sst2, a multi-domain RGS protein in yeast
mutant strain. In contrast, co-expression of C-Sst2 with the N-terminal domain (N-Sst2) partially restored the ability to regulate the growth arrest response, but not the transcription induction response. Whereas the full length protein was localized to the microsomal and plasma membrane fractions, the N-Sst2 species was predominantly in the microsomal fraction, while C-Sst2 was in the soluble fraction. Mutations that block proteasome or vacuolar protease function, or mutations in the cleavage site Ser residues of Sst2, did not alter processing. However, Sst2 processing did require expression of other components of the pheromone response pathway, including the receptor and the G protein. These results indicate that Sst2 is proteolytically processed, that this event is regulated by the signaling pathway, and that processing can profoundly alter the function and subcellular localization of the protein.
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. L. Bach, W. T. Kerr, Y. Wang, E. M. Bauman, P. Kine, E. L. Whiteman, R. S. Morgan, E. K. Williamson, E. M. Ostap, J. K. Burkhardt, et al. PI3K regulates pleckstrin-2 in T-cell cytoskeletal reorganization Blood, February 1, 2007; 109(3): 1147 - 1155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. A. Chasse, P. Flanary, S. C. Parnell, N. Hao, J. Y. Cha, D. P. Siderovski, and H. G. Dohlman Genome-Scale Analysis Reveals Sst2 as the Principal Regulator of Mating Pheromone Signaling in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2006; 5(2): 330 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. C. Segers, J. C. Regier, and Donald. L. Nuss Evidence for a Role of the Regulator of G-Protein Signaling Protein CPRGS-1 in G{alpha} Subunit CPG-1-Mediated Regulation of Fungal Virulence, Conidiation, and Hydrophobin Synthesis in the Chestnut Blight Fungus Cryphonectria parasitica Eukaryot. Cell, December 1, 2004; 3(6): 1454 - 1463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Anger, W. Zhang, and U. Mende Differential Contribution of GTPase Activation and Effector Antagonism to the Inhibitory Effect of RGS Proteins on Gq-mediated Signaling in Vivo J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2004; 279(6): 3906 - 3915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. A. Martemyanov, P. V. Lishko, N. Calero, G. Keresztes, M. Sokolov, K. J. Strissel, I. B. Leskov, J. A. Hopp, A. V. Kolesnikov, C.-K. Chen, et al. The DEP Domain Determines Subcellular Targeting of the GTPase Activating Protein RGS9 In Vivo J. Neurosci., November 12, 2003; 23(32): 10175 - 10181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. A. Patikoglou and M. R. Koelle An N-terminal Region of Caenorhabditis elegans RGS Proteins EGL-10 and EAT-16 Directs Inhibition of Galpha oVersus Galpha q Signaling J. Biol. Chem., November 27, 2002; 277(49): 47004 - 47013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Hollinger and J. R. Hepler Cellular Regulation of RGS Proteins: Modulators and Integrators of G Protein Signaling Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2002; 54(3): 527 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. A. Burchett, P. Flanary, C. Aston, L. Jiang, K. H. Young, P. Uetz, S. Fields, and H. G. Dohlman Regulation of Stress Response Signaling by the N-terminal Dishevelled/EGL-10/Pleckstrin Domain of Sst2, a Regulator of G Protein Signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae J. Biol. Chem., June 14, 2002; 277(25): 22156 - 22167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B.-E Xu, K. R. Skowronek, and J. Kurjan The N Terminus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sst2p Plays an RGS-Domain-Independent, Mpt5p-Dependent Role in Recovery From Pheromone Arrest Genetics, December 1, 2001; 159(4): 1559 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |