JBC Advanced Peptides, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on August 24, 2001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
276/35/33129    most recent
M105400200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wong, P. M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Chung, S.-W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wong, P. M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Chung, S.-W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Papers In Press, published online ahead of print June 27, 2001
J. Biol. Chem, 10.1074/jbc.M105400200
Submitted on June 12, 2001
Revised on June 27, 2001
Accepted on June 27, 2001

A single point mutation at the 3'-UTR of Ran mRNA leads to profound changes in Lipopolysaccharide endotoxin-mediated responses

Peter M. C. Wong, Quan Yuan, Hong Chen, Barnet M. Sultzer, and Siu-Wah Chung

Pathology & Lab Medicine, Fels Institute, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140

Corresponding Author: Petermcw{at}aol.com

By functional cDNA expression cloning, we have previously established that Ran is important in LPS signaling. This was achieved by functional comparison between two cDNAs, differing by a single base substitution within the 3'-UTR of the cDNA. This point mutation results in striking RNA conformational change. No dramatic difference in total RNA at steady state could be found between the two molecules. However, at the protein level, RanC/d (from 870C mRNA) was 5-10 fold higher than RanT/n (from 870T mRNA) and this difference was not observed in non-hematopoietic cells transduced with the same vectors. This tissue-specific difference correlated with a difference in LPS endotoxin responses in corresponding hematopoietic cells. Importantly, the amounts of RanC/d and RanT/n proteins were similar initially but the difference became obvious with time. Both Ran proteins migrated from the cytoplasm to the nucleus, but Ran from RanC/d migrated faster than that of RanT/n. RanT/n protein preferentially remained in the cytoplasm and its overall amount was reduced at steady state, consistent with its degradation by intracellular proteases known to be involved in LPS-mediated signal transduction. As the two proteins are identical, the faster RanC/d nuclear localization and a preferred initial cytoplasmic RanT/n distribution suggest a difference in mRNA intracellular localization between the two molecules, as dictated by their RNA structural difference. By pulse-chase experiments, RanC/d proteins are more resistant to degradation than RanT/n protein; there also appear to have two populations of RanT/n proteins, one may reside in the cytoplasm and the other, in the nucleus. More RanC/d GTPase accumulated in the nuclei would conceivably alter the potency of signal transduction and therefore down-modulate LPS-mediated biological responses.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.