![]()
|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Papers In Press, published online ahead of print May 1, 2002
J. Biol. Chem, 10.1074/jbc.M202282200
Submitted on March 8, 2002
Revised on April 25, 2002
Accepted on April 30, 2002
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, La Jolla, CA 92093-0669
Corresponding Author: rkolodner{at}ucsd.edu
Previous studies described four dominant msh6 mutations that interfered with both the MSH2-MSH6 and MSH2-MSH3 mismatch recognition complexes (Das Gupta, R., and Kolodner, R. D. (2000) Nat. Genet. 24, 53-56). Modeling predicted that two of the amino acid substitutions (G1067D, G1142D) interfere with protein-protein interactions at the ATP binding site-associated dimer interface, one (S1036P) similarly interferes with protein-protein interactions and effects the MSH2 ATP binding site and one (H1096A) effects the MSH6 ATP binding site. The ATPase activity of the MSH2-msh6-G1067D and MSH2-msh6-G1142D complexes was inhibited by GT, +A and +AT mispairs and these complexes showed increased binding to GT and +A mispairs in the presence of ATP. The ATPase activity of the MSH2-msh6-S1036P complex was inhibited by a GT mispair and it bound the GT mispair in the presence of ATP whereas its interaction with insertion mispairs was unchanged compared to the wild-type complex. The ATPase activity of the MSH2-msh6-H1096A complex was generally attenuated and its mispair-binding behavior was uneffected. These results are in contrast to the wild-type MSH2-MSH6 complex, which showed mispair stimulated ATPase activity and ATP inhibition of mispair binding. These results indicate that the dominant msh6 mutations cause more stable binding to mispairs and suggests there may be differences in how base base and insertion mispairs are recognized.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Sun and J. Xu Genetic Analyses of a Hybrid Cross Between Serotypes A and D Strains of the Human Pathogenic Fungus Cryptococcus neoformans Genetics, November 1, 2007; 177(3): 1475 - 1486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Harrington and R. D. Kolodner Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2-Msh3 Acts in Repair of Base-Base Mispairs Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2007; 27(18): 6546 - 6554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Hess, M. L. Mendillo, D. J. Mazur, and R. D. Kolodner Biochemical basis for dominant mutations in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH6 gene PNAS, January 17, 2006; 103(3): 558 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Mendillo, D. J. Mazur, and R. D. Kolodner Analysis of the Interaction between the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH2-MSH6 and MLH1-PMS1 Complexes with DNA Using a Reversible DNA End-blocking System J. Biol. Chem., June 10, 2005; 280(23): 22245 - 22257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Lamers, D. Georgijevic, J. H. Lebbink, H. H. K. Winterwerp, B. Agianian, N. de Wind, and T. K. Sixma ATP Increases the Affinity between MutS ATPase Domains: IMPLICATIONS FOR ATP HYDROLYSIS AND CONFORMATIONAL CHANGES J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 2004; 279(42): 43879 - 43885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Martik, C. Baitinger, and P. Modrich Differential Specificities and Simultaneous Occupancy of Human MutS{alpha} Nucleotide Binding Sites J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 2004; 279(27): 28402 - 28410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. P. Bjornson and P. Modrich Differential and Simultaneous Adenosine Di- and Triphosphate Binding by MutS J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 18557 - 18562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Lau and R. D. Kolodner Transfer of the MSH2{middle dot}MSH6 Complex from Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen to Mispaired Bases in DNA J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(1): 14 - 17. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| All ASBMB Journals | Molecular and Cellular Proteomics |
| Journal of Lipid Research | ASBMB Today |