JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on September 20, 2002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
277/39/36665    most recent
M203222200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wadhwa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaul, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wadhwa, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kaul, S. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Papers In Press, published online ahead of print July 26, 2002
J. Biol. Chem, 10.1074/jbc.M203222200
Submitted on April 4, 2002
Revised on July 19, 2002
Accepted on July 26, 2002

A major functional difference between the mouse and human ARF tumor suppressor proteins

Renu Wadhwa, Takashi Sugihara, Md Kamrul Hasan, Kazunari Taira, Roger R. Reddel, and Sunil C. Kaul

Research Center for Glycoscience, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Science City, Ibaraki 305 8566

Corresponding Author: s-kaul{at}aist.go.jp

Suppression of tumorigenesis is considerably more stringent in the human than in the much shorter-lived mouse species, and the reasons for this difference are poorly understood. We investigated functional differences in the control of the ARF (Alternative Reading Frame) protein that acts upstream of p53 and is encoded along with p16INK4a at a major tumor suppressor locus in both the human and mouse genomes. The mouse and human ARF proteins are substantially divergent at their C-termini. We have shown that the mouse ARF protein (p19ARF) interacts with Pex19p in the cell cytoplasm leading to its nuclear exclusion and repression of its p53 activation function. The human ARF protein (p14ARF) is substantially smaller than its mouse counterpart and is not subject to this functional inactivation by Pex19p. In an identical cellular background, ribozymes directed against Pex19p enhanced p19ARF-, but not p14ARF-activated p53 function. This is the first demonstration of a functional difference between the mouse and human ARF proteins. In view of the major role of ARF in tumor suppression, this distinction may contribute to the different levels of tumor-proneness of these species.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
N. Widodo, C. C. Deocaris, K. Kaur, K. Hasan, T. Yaguchi, K. Yamasaki, T. Sugihara, T. Ishii, R. Wadhwa, and S. C. Kaul
Stress Chaperones, Mortalin, and Pex19p Mediate 5-Aza-2' Deoxycytidine-Induced Senescence of Cancer Cells by DNA Methylation-Independent Pathway
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., March 1, 2007; 62(3): 246 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.