Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on March 17, 2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
281/11/7421    most recent
M511380200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamburgh, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, V. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hamburgh, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Prasad, V. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Papers In Press, published online ahead of print January 18, 2006
J. Biol. Chem, 10.1074/jbc.M511380200
Submitted on October 19, 2005
Revised on January 18, 2006
Accepted on January 18, 2006

Structural determinants of slippage-mediated mutations by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase

Monica E. Hamburgh, Kenneth A. Curr, Melissa Monaghan, Vasudev R. Rao, Snehlata Tripathi, Bradley D. Preston, Stefan Sarafianos, Eddy Arnold, Thomas Darden, and Vinayaka R. Prasad

Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461

Corresponding Author: prasad{at}aecom.yu.edu

Single-base deletions at nucleotide runs or –1 frameshifting by HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) result from template slippage during polymerization. In crystal structures of HIV-1 RT complexed with DNA-DNA template-primer, the palm subdomain in the template cleft contacts template backbone near the proposed site of slippage via the Glu89 sidechain. We investigated the role of residue Glu89 in frameshifting by perturbing this interaction. Substitutions with Asp, Gly, Ala, Val, Ser, Thr, Asn, or Lys were created in recombinant HIV RT, and frameshift frequencies of resulting mutant RTs were measured. All substitutions led to reduced –1 frameshifting by HIV-1 RT (2- to 40-fold). Interestingly, the suppression of –1 frameshifting frequently coincided with an enhancement of +1 frameshifting (3- to 47-fold) suggesting that residue Glu89 can influence the slippage of both strands. Glu89 substitutions also led to reduced rates of dNTP misincorporation that paralleled reductions in -1 frameshifting, suggesting a common structural mechanism for both classes of RT error. Our results reveal a major influence of residue Glu89 on slippage-mediated errors and dNTP incorporation fidelity. Crystal structure of HIV-1 RT reveals a salt bridge between Glu89 and Lys154, which may facilitate –1 frameshifting; this concept is supported by the observed reduction in –1 frameshifting for Lys154A and Lys154R mutants.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
L. Leppik, K. Gunst, M. Lehtinen, J. Dillner, K. Streker, and E.-M. de Villiers
In Vivo and In Vitro Intragenomic Rearrangement of TT Viruses
J. Virol., September 1, 2007; 81(17): 9346 - 9356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement