Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on May 16, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/20/14153    most recent
M706271200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cerione, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cerione, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Papers In Press, published online ahead of print March 18, 2008
J. Biol. Chem, 10.1074/jbc.M706271200
Submitted on July 30, 2007
Accepted on March 18, 2008

Effector proteins exert an important influence on the signaling-active state of the small GTPase CDC42

Matthew J. Phillips, Guillermo Calero, Britton Chan, Sekar Ramachandran, and Richard A. Cerione

Molecular Medicine, Cornell University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY 14853-6401

Corresponding Author: rac1{at}cornell.edu

GTP-binding (G) proteins regulate the flow of information in cellular signaling pathways by alternating between a GTP-bound “active” state, and a GDP-bound “inactive” state. Cdc42, a member of the Rho family of Ras-related small G-proteins, plays key roles in the regulation of cell shape, motility, and growth. Here we describe the high-resolution X-ray crystal structure for Cdc42 bound to the GTP-analog GMP-PCP (i.e. the presumed signaling-active state) and show that it is virtually identical to the structures for the signaling-inactive, GDP-bound form of the protein, contrary to what has been reported for Ras and other G-proteins. Especially surprising was that the GMP-PCP- and GDP-bound forms of Cdc42 did not show detectable differences in their Switch I and Switch II loops. Fluorescence studies using a Cdc42 mutant in which a tryptophan residue was introduced at position 32 of Switch I also showed that there was little difference in the Switch I conformation between the GDP- and GMP-PCP bound states (i.e. <10%), which again differed from Ras where much larger changes in Trp32 fluorescence were observed when comparing these two nucleotide-bound states (>30%). However, the binding of an effector protein induced significant changes in the Trp32 emission specifically from GMP-PCP-bound Cdc42, as well as in the phosphate resonances for GTP-analogs bound to this G-protein as indicated in NMR studies. An examination of the available structures for Cdc42 complexed to different effector proteins, versus the X-ray crystal structure for GMP-PCP-bound Cdc42, provides a possible explanation for how effectors can distinguish between the GTP- and GDP-bound forms of this G-protein and ensure that the necessary conformational changes for signal propagation occur.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement