JBC Avanti Polar Lipids

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


A more recent version of this article appeared on February 8, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Accepted Manuscript)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
283/6/3141    most recent
M707343200v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Song, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bambara, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Song, M.
Right arrow Articles by Bambara, R. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Papers In Press, published online ahead of print December 11, 2007
J. Biol. Chem, 10.1074/jbc.M707343200
Submitted on August 31, 2007
Revised on December 10, 2007
Accepted on December 11, 2007

Proximity and branch migration mechanisms in HIV-1 minus strand strong stop DNA transfer

Min Song, Vandana Purohit Basu, Mark N. Hanson, Bernard P. Roques, and Robert A. Bambara

Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642

Corresponding Author: robert_bambara{at}urmc.rochester.edu

HIV-1 minus strand transfer was measured using a genomic donor–acceptor template system in vitro. Donor RNA D199, having the minimum region required for minus strong stop DNA synthesis, was previously shown to transfer with 35% efficiency to an acceptor RNA representing the 3' repeat region (R). Donor D520, having an additional 321 nucleotide segment extending into gag, transferred at 75% efficiency. In this study, each transfer step was analyzed to account for the difference. Measurement of terminal transfer indicated that the 3' terminus of the cDNA generated using D520 is more accessible for transfer than that of D199. Nevertheless, acceptor competition experiments demonstrated that D520 has a greater preference for invasion-driven versus terminal transfer than D199. Competition mapping showed that the base of TAR is the primary invasion site for D520, important for efficient acceptor invasion. Acceptors complementary to the invasion and terminal transfer sites, but not the region between, allowed assessment of the significance of hybrid propagation by branch migration. These bipartite acceptors showed that with D520, invasion raises the local concentration of the acceptor for efficient terminal transfer by a proximity effect. However, with D199, invasion is relatively inefficient and the cDNA 3' terminus is not very accessible. For most transfers that occurred, the acceptor accessed the cDNA 3' end by branch migration. Results suggest that both proximity and branch migration mechanisms contribute to transfers, with the proportion determined by donor-cDNA structure. D520 transfers better because it has greater accessibility for both invasion and terminus transfer.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.