|
Volume 270,
Number 12,
Issue of March 24, 1995 pp. 6710-6717
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Kinetics and Localization of the
Phosphorylation of Rhodopsin by Protein Kinase C (*)
(Received for publication, August 17, 1994; and in revised form, November 22, 1994)
N. Michelle
Greene
(1), (§),
David S.
Williams(§)
(2),
Alexandra
C.
Newton
(1)(§)(¶)From the
(1)Department of Chemistry and the
(2)School of Optometry, Indiana University,
Bloomington, Indiana 47405
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Experimental Procedures
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Protein kinase C isolated from retina catalyzes the
stoichiometric phosphorylation of bovine rhodopsin. Enzymological
studies using receptor in rod outer segment membranes stripped of
peripheral proteins reveal that the phosphorylation is independent of
receptor conformation or liganded state; the half-time for
phosphorylation of unbleached (dark-adapted) rhodopsin, bleached
(light-activated) rhodopsin, and opsin (chromophore removed) is the
same. The phosphorylation by protein kinase C is Ca and lipid regulated; the K for
Ca decreases with increasing concentrations of
membrane, consistent with known properties of
Ca -regulated protein kinase Cs. The K for ATP is 27 µM, with an
optimal concentration for MgCl of approximately 1
mM. The phosphorylation of rhodopsin by protein kinase C is
inhibited by the protein kinase C-selective inhibitor sangivamycin.
Proteolysis by Asp-N reveals that all the protein kinase C
phosphorylation sites are on the carboxyl terminus of the receptor.
Cleavage with trypsin indicates that Ser , the primary
phosphorylation site of rhodopsin kinase, is not phosphorylated
significantly; rather, the primary phosphorylation site of protein
kinase C is on the membrane proximal half of the carboxyl terminus. The
protein kinase C-catalyzed phosphorylation of rhodopsin is analogous to
the ligand-independent phosphorylation of other G protein-coupled
receptors that is catalyzed by second messenger-regulated kinases.
INTRODUCTION
Second messenger-regulated kinases and substrate-regulated
kinases provide two desensitizing mechanisms in the regulation of G
protein-coupled receptors. Most notably, the adrenergic receptor
is desensitized at low ligand levels primarily by phosphorylation
catalyzed by protein kinase A, and possibly C, and at high ligand
levels by phosphorylation mediated by the adrenergic receptor
kinase(1) . Recent evidence implicates both types of kinases in
regulation of olfactory receptors (2, 3) and
muscarinic acetylcholine receptors(4) . For these signaling
pathways, phosphorylation by two differently regulated kinases allows
exquisite fine tuning of receptor function. In phototransduction, it
has been clearly established that a G protein-coupled receptor kinase,
rhodopsin kinase, phosphorylates and deactivates light-activated
rhodopsin(5, 6) . In this pathway, absorption of a
photon induces isomerization of the receptor's covalently bound
ligand, 11-cis retinal, thus effecting a conformational change that
exposes cytoplasmic surfaces on the receptor to allow interaction with
transducin(6) . These exposed surfaces also promote binding of
rhodopsin kinase and subsequent phosphorylation on the receptor's
carboxyl terminus. The primary phosphorylation sites by rhodopsin
kinase in vitro have been recently identified as Ser and Ser (7, 8, 9) .
Phosphorylation on the carboxyl terminus decreases the interaction with
transducin, an interaction that is effectively quenched when arrestin
binds the polyphosphorylated carboxyl tail(10) . Similar to
other G protein-coupled receptor kinases, rhodopsin kinase displays
strict specificity for the active conformation of the receptor. Mounting evidence implicates phosphorylation by an additional
kinase, protein kinase C, in the phosphorylation of rhodopsin. First,
hyperactivation of protein kinase C in the intact retina, by treatment
with phorbol esters, alters the phosphorylation of rhodopsin in a
light-dependent manner(11, 12) . Second, rhodopsin is
phosphorylated by protein kinase C in
vitro(11, 13) . This phosphorylation has been
shown to uncouple the receptor from transducin(13) . Third, the
allosteric activator of protein kinase C, diacylglycerol, has been
shown by many groups to be produced in response to
light(14, 15, 16, 17, 18) .
Phospholipase Cs have been biochemically isolated from and
immunolocalized to photoreceptors(19, 20) , and, more
recently, cDNAs encoding 4 phospholipase C s with high homology to
the Drosophila norpA gene (which encodes the phospholipase C
involved in invertebrate phototransduction) have been
identified(21) . The sensitivity of rhodopsin phosphorylation
to protein kinase C activators in situ and the light-dependent
generation of diacylglycerol in rod outer segments support a role for
protein kinase C in visual transduction. This contribution provides
a kinetic and structural analysis of the phosphorylation of rhodopsin
by protein kinase C. Our data reveal that the phosphorylation of
rhodopsin by protein kinase C is mechanistically similar to the
phosphorylation of other G protein-coupled receptors by second
messenger-regulated kinases. Most importantly, the phosphorylation is
independent of the liganded state of the receptor, and the primary
phosphorylation site, although on the carboxyl terminus, differs from
that of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase.
Experimental Procedures
MaterialsATP, leupeptin, phorbol myristate acetate (PMA), ( )trypsin (1.2 10 BAEE units
mg ), and phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride were
purchased from Sigma. [ - P]ATP (3000 Ci
mmol ) and chemiluminescence Renaissance reagents
were supplied by DuPont NEN. Endoproteinase Asp-N (sequencing grade)
and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG were
obtained from Boehringer Mannheim; octylglucoside was from Calbiochem.
The ultrapure glycerol in which the protein kinase C was stored was
supplied by U. S. Biochemical Corp. Q Sepharose Fast Flow and
phenyl-Sepharose resins and phenyl Superose (HR 5/5) and Mono Q (HR
5/5) columns were obtained from Pharmacia Biotech Inc. The protein
kinase C selective peptide substrate (FKKSFKL-NH ; (22) ) was synthesized by the Indiana University Biochemistry
Biotechnology Facility. A polyclonal antibody against opsin was
generated as described(12) . The 11-cis retinal was a generous
gift from the National Eye Institute. All other chemicals were reagent
grade.
MethodsIsolation of Rod Outer Segment Membranes-Rod
outer segments were isolated from 60 dark-adapted bovine retinas using
sucrose density gradient centrifugation as described
previously(23) . These were resuspended in 10 ml of 10 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 20 µM leupeptin, 200
µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM DTT, 20
mM Tris, pH 7.5, at 4 °C (lysis buffer) to effect osmotic
lysis. The cytosolic and particulate fractions were separated by
centrifugation at 245,000 g for 45 min at 4 °C.
The membranes were resuspended in 2 ml of lysis buffer and either
urea-stripped or stored dark-adapted at -70 °C. The cytosol
was stored in 50% glycerol and used as the source of rhodopsin kinase.
All procedures were carried out under dim red light (Kodak filter 1).
Urea-Stripping of Rod Outer Segment MembranesMembranes
were stripped of peripheral proteins based on the procedure of Lee et al.(24) . Briefly, dark-adapted membranes from 30
retinas (approximately 12 mg of rhodopsin) were centrifuged at 500,000
g for 30 min at 4 °C. The pellet was resuspended
in 1 ml of 4 M urea, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT,
and 2 mM MOPS, pH 7.5, at 4 °C (Buffer A) and centrifuged
again at 500,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C. The wash
with Buffer A was repeated for a total of 3 times. After the final
centrifugation, the pellet was resuspended in 1 ml of 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, and 2 mM MOPS, pH 7.5, at 4
°C (Buffer B) and again washed 3 times in this buffer. The
dark-adapted, stripped membranes were stored at -70 °C in 20
µM leupeptin and 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, at 4
°C; the rhodopsin concentration in this stock varied from 100 to
200 µM. The concentration of rhodopsin in
octylglucoside-solubilized (1%) samples was determined
spectrophotometrically at 500 nm using = 42,700 M cm (25) . All
procedures were carried out under dim red light (Kodak filter 1). The
phospholipid/rhodopsin concentration was 90 ± 7 mol
phospholipid/mol of rhodopsin as determined by phosphate analysis (26) of chloroform/methanol-extracted lipids(27) .
Regeneration of Rod Outer Segment
MembranesRhodopsin was regenerated based on the procedure of
McDowell(28) . Stripped membranes (50 µl of 100-200
µM rhodopsin) were incubated at 30 °C in 1 ml of
solution containing 1 mM MgCl , 1 mM DTT,
20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, at 30 °C, with 2 µl of 11-cis
retinal (17.6 mM stored in 100% ethanol) in the dark overnight
at 4 °C and then stored at -70 °C. The final
concentration of ethanol in the regeneration tube was less than 1%.
Purification of Protein Kinase CProtein kinase C
was purified from 60 dark-adapted bovine retinas by sequential Q
Sepharose, phenyl-Sepharose, and phenyl-Superose chromatography,
essentially as described for purification of rod outer segment protein
kinase C(29) . Protein kinase C (typically 500 nM; 8
ml) was stored at -20 °C in 50% glycerol, 0.5 mM DTT, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM EGTA, 100 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4 (4 °C). In one experiment
(see Fig. 2), protein kinase C was further purified by
chromatography on a Mono Q column.
Figure 2:
Time course of phosphorylation of
unbleached rhodopsin ( ), bleached rhodopsin ( ), and opsin
( ) by protein kinase C. Receptor (275 nM) in
urea-stripped rod outer segment membranes was incubated with retinal
protein kinase C (40 nM) and 100 µM CaCl for the indicated times at 30 °C. Data represent the mean
± S.E. of a triplicate assay; lines drawn are those
predicted from the Michaelis-Menten
equation.
Phosphorylation AssayRetinal protein kinase C
(1-4 pmol) was incubated in a 64-µl reaction volume
containing urea-stripped rod outer segment membranes (20 pmol of
rhodopsin, unless otherwise stated) and phosphorylation initiated by
the addition of 16 µl of a solution containing
[ - P]ATP (250 µM; 0.45 Ci
mmol ATP) and MgCl (25 mM) in
20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4. The final concentrations of species in a
typical reaction mixture were as follows: 150 µM CaCl , 5 mM MgCl , 50 µM [ - P]ATP, 1 mM DTT, 100
µM leupeptin, 13 mM KCl, 25 µM EDTA,
25 µM EGTA, 6% glycerol, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 (30
°C). For some experiments, rhodopsin, MgCl , ATP, or
Ca concentrations were varied as indicated in figure
legends. In other experiments, 0.8 µl of PMA (100 nM in
Me SO) was added to the reaction volume prior to addition of
ATP and vortexed immediately. The final concentration of PMA (1
nM) corresponded to 0.003 mol % relative to the lipid.
Experiments in which Ca concentrations were varied
were conducted in the presence of 525 µM EGTA to buffer
the Ca . Samples were incubated at 30 °C for 10
min unless indicated otherwise. Phosphorylations catalyzed by rhodopsin
kinase (in rod outer segment cytosol or partially purified by
phenyl-Sepharose chromatography) were carried out under the same
conditions except that partially purified rhodopsin kinase replaced the
protein kinase C, and 0.1 mM EDTA and 0.1 mM EGTA
replaced the CaCl in the assay to inhibit contaminating
protein kinase C. Reactions were quenched by the addition of 25 µl
of SDS-PAGE sample buffer (0.25 M Tris, 8% SDS, 40% glycerol,
0.008% bromphenol blue, 20% -mercaptoethanol, pH 6.8), and the
samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (10% acrylamide) followed by
autoradiography (Kodak X-Omat film) or analysis on a Molecular Dynamics
PhosphorImager. Rhodopsin bands were excised from gels, added to 2.5 ml
of scintillation fluid (Biosafe II, Research Products International
Corp.), and P incorporation was detected by scintillation
counting. Alternatively, reactions were quenched with 25 µl of 0.1 M cold ATP and 0.1 M EDTA and spotted on Whatman P-81
ion-exchange paper. The papers were washed 4 times in 0.4% (v/v)
phosphoric acid and once in 95% ethanol and then added to 5 ml of
scintillation fluid. Incorporation of P into protein
(>95% into rhodopsin) was detected by scintillation counting.For
the experiment shown in Fig. 4, the rate of phosphorylation of a
protein kinase C selective peptide (FKKSFKL-NH ; (22) ) was measured as described(30) , except that rod
outer segment membranes provided the lipid to stimulate protein kinase
C rather than phosphatidylserine/diacyglycerol vesicles.
Figure 4:
Ca -dependence of retinal
protein kinase C in the presence of two membrane concentrations. A, the initial rate of phosphorylation of bleached rhodopsin
(0.35 µM) catalyzed by retinal protein kinase C (10
nM) was examined in the presence of 0-250 µM free Ca and stripped rod outer segment membranes
resulting in a lipid concentration in the assay of 32 µM ( ). Data represent the weighted average ± S.D. of two
or three experiments, each in hextuplicate. B, The initial
rate of phosphorylation of a protein kinase C-selective peptide,
stimulated by 32 µM lipid ( ) or 320 µM lipid ( ) in rod outer segment membranes, was measured
under the exact conditions described in A except that 50
µg ml of the synthetic peptide were included in
the assay. Data represent the weighted average ± S.D. of two
experiments, each in hextuplicate. Lines drawn are those
predicted from the modified Hill equation(33) . All assays
included 525 µM EGTA.
Generation of OpsinOpsin was generated from
rhodopsin as described by Hofmann et al.(31) .
Regenerated rod outer segment membranes (200 µl of 7 µM rhodopsin) were incubated for 30 min at room temperature under
150-watt lights with 200 µl of 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM hydroxylamine, and 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 (30 °C). The
membranes were centrifuged at 500,000 g for 10 min at
4 °C. The pellet was washed 3 times by resuspension in 200 µl
of 100 mM NaCl and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, at 4 °C
and centrifugation. The final pellet was resuspended in 200 µl of
10 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, at 4 °C. Bleached rhodopsin was
generated by exposure of rhodopsin to room light; phosphorylation
reactions were initiated 10 min after light exposure.
Asp-N ProteolysisRod outer segment membranes were
phosphorylated by protein kinase C or rhodopsin kinase, as described
above, and the P incorporation was inhibited by diluting
the reaction 2.8-fold with 0.1 M EDTA and 0.1 M ATP
(not radioactive). The membranes were centrifuged at 500,000 g for 20 min to remove the chelator, DTT, and ATP and
resuspended in 50 µM CaCl , 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 (30 °C), to a concentration of 0.30 µM receptor. The membrane-containing solution (0.25 µM receptor) was incubated with endoproteinase Asp-N (2.5 µg
ml ) at 30 °C for 45 min. Proteolysis was stopped
by the addition of SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and the samples were
analyzed by SDS-PAGE (10% acrylamide) and autoradiography. To visualize
the rhodopsin, the proteins were electrophoretically transferred to
nitrocellulose and labeled with antibodies to opsin via incubation with
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG and detection by
chemiluminescence(32) .
Trypsin ProteolysisUrea-stripped rod outer
segment membranes were phosphorylated and centrifuged as described for
the proteolysis with the endoproteinase Asp-N. The phosphorylated
membranes were resuspended in 50 µM CaCl and
20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5 (4 °C). Trypsin (2-20 µg
ml ; 1.2 10 BAEE units
mg ) was added to the solution (0.25 µM receptor) and incubated for 30 min at 30 °C. The proteolysis
was stopped with SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and the samples were analyzed
by SDS-PAGE (10% acrylamide), autoradiography, and Western blotting, as
described for the Asp-N proteolysis.
Data AnalysisThe dependences of the rate of
protein kinase C-catalyzed phosphorylation of rhodopsin on
Ca , ATP, and rhodopsin concentrations were fit to the
Michaelis-Menten equation or a modified Hill equation (33) using the program Grafit(34) .
Free Calcium DeterminationsFree calcium
concentrations were calculated using a computer program provided by
Claude Klee (35) that takes into account pH,
Ca , Mg , K ,
Na , EGTA, and ATP concentrations.
RESULTS
Kinetic Analysis of the Phosphorylation of Rhodopsin by
Protein Kinase CUrea-stripped membranes containing unbleached
rhodopsin, bleached rhodopsin, or opsin were incubated with
[ P]ATP in the presence or absence of retinal
protein kinase C, Ca , and PMA. The autoradiogram in Fig. 1A shows that protein kinase C catalyzed a
Ca -dependent phosphorylation of all three forms of
rhodopsin (lanes4, 10, and 16).
Addition of PMA had no significant effect on the
Ca -dependent incorporation of P into
rhodopsin (lanes5, 11, and 17),
indicating that the membranes provided saturating concentrations of
diacylglycerol. In support of this, analysis of membranes revealed
approximately 1 mol % diacylglycerol (data not shown), sufficient for
maximal activity of protein kinase C(36) . Autophosphorylation
of protein kinase C, a good indicator of the intrinsic catalytic
activity of protein kinase Cs(37) , was also dependent on
Ca and was not additionally stimulated by phorbol
esters (e.g.lanes4 and 5),
providing further support that the membranes provided an optimal
environment for activation of this enzyme. No detectable P
was incorporated into receptor in the absence of added protein kinase C (lanes6-8, 12-14, and 19-20), indicating that the membranes had no associated
kinase activity. Of particular importance was the lack of
phosphorylation of bleached membranes (lanes12-14), revealing that rhodopsin kinase was not
associated with the membranes.
Figure 1:
Phosphorylation of unbleached
rhodopsin, bleached rhodopsin, and opsin by protein kinase C or
rhodopsin kinase. A, autoradiogram of unbleached rhodopsin (U, lanes3-8), bleached rhodopsin (B,
lanes9-14), or opsin (O lanes15-20) (275 nM receptor in all lanes), in
urea-stripped rod outer segment membranes, incubated in the presence (lanes3-5, 9-11, and 15-17) or absence (lanes6-8, 12-14, and 18-20) of 40 nM retinal protein kinase C, 5 mM MgCl , and 50
µM ATP for 30 min at 30 °C. CaCl (100
µM) or PMA (1 nM) was included as indicated.
Receptor samples were prepared as described under
``Methods.'' In addition to rhodopsin phosphorylation,
autophosphorylation of protein kinase C is evident. Coomassie
Blue-stained gel corresponding to the autoradiogram of lanes5 and 6, showing rhodopsin and protein kinase C,
is presented in lanes1 and 2. Panel
B, as in A except that rhodopsin kinase (10 nM)
replaced protein kinase C.
In contrast to the phosphorylation by
protein kinase C, the phosphorylation catalyzed by rhodopsin kinase was
specific for the bleached conformation of rhodopsin. Fig. 1B shows that unbleached rhodopsin (lanes3-5) and opsin (lanes15-17) were not substrates of rhodopsin kinase,
whereas bleached rhodopsin was (lanes9-11).
The phosphorylation of bleached rhodopsin by rhodopsin kinase was not
sensitive to Ca (lane10) or
phorbol esters (lane11) under the conditions of the
experiment. Note that less than 0.1 µM recoverin was
present in the reaction mixture, based on Coomassie staining of gels,
and thus recoverin-dependent Ca effects would not be
expected(38) . Fig. 2compares time courses for
phosphorylation of unbleached rhodopsin, bleached rhodopsin, and opsin.
For the concentrations of protein kinase C and receptor examined in
this figure, the half-time of phosphorylation was approximately the
same for all species of receptor: 57 ± 9 min for unbleached
rhodopsin and opsin (weighted average ± S.E. for both sets of
data) and 52 ± 3 min for bleached rhodopsin. The final
stoichiometry for phosphorylation of bleached rhodopsin by retinal
protein kinase C varied from 0.6 to 1.2 mol of phosphate/mol of
receptor, depending on membrane preparation, and was typically 4-fold
less than the maximal phosphorylation catalyzed by rhodopsin kinase
(data not shown). In general, unbleached rhodopsin and opsin
incorporated 80-100% of the phosphate incorporated by bleached
rhodopsin. Addition of fresh protein kinase C to the reaction mixture
after phosphate incorporation had plateaued did not result in a
significant increase in phosphorylation, revealing that P
incorporation had plateaued because phosphorylation sites were no
longer available. The receptor present in these experiments was
quantitatively proteolyzed by endoproteinase Asp-N to generate a 32-kDa
truncated form (see Fig. 7B). Because this protease
cleaves the cytoplasmic (carboxyl) terminal tail of rhodopsin, all
receptor molecules were oriented with their cytoplasmic surface exposed
to the solution.
Figure 7:
Partial proteolysis to identify the domain
of rhodopsin phosphorylated by protein kinase C. A, Cartoon
representation of bovine rhodopsin showing sites of cleavage on the
carboxyl terminus catalyzed by endoproteinase Asp-N and trypsin. B, Western blot (panels on left) and
corresponding autoradiogram (panels on right) of
unbleached rhodopsin (U), bleached rhodopsin (B), or
opsin (O) phosphorylated with protein kinase C (lanes1-6) or rhodopsin kinase (lanes7-12) and then treated with endoproteinase Asp-N
for 30 min at 30 °C. The receptor phosphorylated by protein kinase
C incorporated 0.2 mol of phosphate/mol of receptor; the bleached
rhodopsin phosphorylated by rhodopsin kinase incorporated 0.4 mol of
phosphate/mol of receptor. C, Western blot (panels on left) and corresponding autoradiogram (panels on right) of unbleached rhodopsin (U), bleached
rhodopsin (B), or opsin (O) phosphorylated with
protein kinase C (lanes1-12) or rhodopsin
kinase (lanes13-24) and then treated with the
indicated concentration of trypsin for 30 min at 30 °C. All
receptor species incubated with protein kinase C, and bleached
rhodopsin incubated with rhodopsin kinase, incorporated 0.4 mol of
phosphate/mol of receptor.
Fig. 3shows the rate of rhodopsin
phosphorylation catalyzed by protein kinase C or rhodopsin kinase as a
function of increasing amounts of stripped rod outer segment membranes.
Because the relative concentration of substrate in the membrane was the
same for all rhodopsin concentrations (i.e. same
rhodopsin/lipid ratio), a K for rhodopsin cannot
be interpreted from these data (i.e. because of the reduction
in dimensionality, once the kinase binds the first substrate, the local
concentration of substrate near the kinase is the same for all
conditions). However, the data do reveal that 1) protein kinase C has a
higher affinity for rod outer segment membranes than does rhodopsin
kinase and 2) under the conditions of these assays, 70 ± 2
nM rhodopsin (approximately 6 µM phospholipid)
resulted in half-maximal activation of protein kinase C.
Figure 3:
Dependence of rhodopsin phosphorylation on
concentration of stripped rod outer segment membranes. The initial rate
of phosphorylation of bleached rhodopsin catalyzed by retinal protein
kinase C (40 nM) ( ) or rhodopsin kinase (2 nM)
( ) was examined in the presence of increasing amounts of
stripped rod outer segment membranes (1-800 nM rhodopsin). CaCl (150 µM) was included in
the protein kinase C incubation. Data represent the mean ± S.E.
triplicates.
The
Ca dependence for the activation of retinal protein
kinase C was measured for two substrates and as a function of membrane
concentration. The concentration of Ca resulting in
half-maximal activity toward rhodopsin phosphorylation (Fig. 4A) or phosphorylation of a synthetic peptide (Fig. 4B, opencircles) was the same
(14 ± 3 µM or 14 ± 2 µM,
respectively) in the presence of 32 µM lipid. Note that
this concentration of lipid and rhodopsin (0.35 µM) result
in stimulation of protein kinase C to 90% of its maximal rate (see Fig. 3). The identical Ca requirement for
phosphorylation of two different substrates is consistent with this
cation allosterically modulating the membrane binding and catalytic
activity of protein kinase C (39, 40) rather than
substrate binding. Fig. 4B shows that the K for Ca decreased to 4.6
± 0.3 µM when the concentration of rod outer
segment membranes was increased to 320 µM lipid. The drop
in K that occurred upon a 10-fold increase in
lipid concentration reflects an increase in affinity of protein kinase
C for these membranes. Mosior and Epand (40) showed that the
apparent binding constant of conventional protein kinase Cs for
membranes is linearly proportional to Ca concentration between 100 nM and 0.5 mM Ca . Because the binding of Ca to protein kinase C depends on the total lipid concentration, mol
% phosphatidylserine, and mol %
diacylglycerol(39, 40, 41) , the K for Ca measured in vitro is relative to the specific assay conditions. ( )The
Ca requirement for phosphorylation of unbleached
rhodopsin or opsin was not significantly different from that of
bleached rhodopsin (not shown). The K for ATP
for the phosphorylation of bleached rhodopsin by protein kinase C was
27 ± 3 µM ATP (Fig. 5A). This
number is similar to the K for ATP of known
isozymes when measured using phosphorylation of synthetic peptides, ( )and slightly higher than the reported K for phosphorylation of histone (5-10 µM ATP,(42) ). A concentration of 50 µM ATP was
included in subsequent phosphorylation assays.
Figure 5:
Dependence of the rate of rhodopsin
phosphorylation catalyzed by retinal protein kinase C on ATP and
Mg . A, bleached rhodopsin in stripped rod
outer segment membranes (275 nM receptor) was incubated with
retinal protein kinase C (25 nM), 100 µM CaCl , 5 mM MgCl , and 0-50
µM ATP for 10 min at 30 °C. Data represent the mean
± S.D. of an experiment in triplicate. The line drawn
is that predicted from the Michaelis-Menten equation. B,
phosphorylation reactions were as described in A except that
the ATP concentration was 50 µM and the MgCl concentration was varied from 0-50 mM. The solidcircle represents activity in the absence of
CaCl . Data represent the mean ± S.E. of an
experiment in triplicate.
The dependence on
Mg for the phosphorylation of bleached rhodopsin by
protein kinase C is presented in Fig. 5B. The maximal
rate of phosphorylation of rhodopsin required 1-5 mM MgCl , with higher concentrations resulting in
inhibition of the kinase. This stimulation is consistent with the
Mg requirements reported for the known
Ca -dependent protein kinase Cs; Burns and Bell (42) reported that protein kinase C , II and
are half-maximally stimulated by 0.9, 0.6, and 0.7 mM Mg , respectively. Subsequent phosphorylation
assays were conducted in the presence of 5 mM MgCl . Fig. 6shows that sangivamycin
selectively inhibited the phosphorylation of bleached rhodopsin
catalyzed by protein kinase C compared with the phosphorylation
catalyzed by rhodopsin kinase. Although this nucleoside analogue
competes with ATP for the ATP-binding site, it displays significant
selectivity for protein kinase C's active site compared with that
of other kinases(43) . The phosphorylation catalyzed by protein
kinase C was half-maximally inhibited by 13.4 ± 0.7 µM sangivamycin in the presence of 50 µM ATP; the
IC for this concentration of ATP agrees with the K of 11 µM reported for
Ca -dependent protein kinase Cs(43) . In
contrast, rhodopsin kinase was considerably less sensitive to
sangivamycin, with only 35 ± 1% inhibition observed in the
presence of 100 µM inhibitor. Because rhodopsin kinase has
a higher affinity for ATP than protein kinase C (K = 2 µM with 1 mM Mg (44) ), it may be less sensitive to
inhibition by sangivamycin even though the K for
interaction with sangivamycin may be similar. Inhibition of
autophosphorylation of both kinases followed similar kinetics as
inhibition of rhodopsin phosphorylation (data not shown), indicating
that sangivamycin was inhibiting the intrinsic catalytic activity of
each kinase rather than preventing substrate interaction.
Figure 6:
Sangivamycin selectively inhibits
rhodopsin phosphorylation catalyzed by retinal protein kinase C. The
initial rate of rhodopsin phosphorylation was measured in the presence
of 50 µM ATP, 10 mM MgCl , and
0-100 µM sangivamycin. Phosphorylation was catalyzed
by 20 nM retinal protein kinase C (in which case 330
µM CaCl , 0.12 mM EDTA, and 0.12
mM EGTA were included in the reaction mixture) or 8 nM of rhodopsin kinase (in which case 0.12 mM EDTA and 0.12
mM EGTA were included in the reaction mixture; similar data
were obtained in the presence of 330 µM CaCl (not shown)). Data represent the mean ± S.D. of an
experiment in triplicate.
Structural Analysis of the Phosphorylation of Rhodopsin
by Protein Kinase CIn order to determine the domain of
rhodopsin phosphorylated by protein kinase C, unbleached rhodopsin,
bleached rhodopsin, and opsin were phosphorylated by protein kinase C
and then treated with endoproteinase Asp-N. This protease cleaves
bovine rhodopsin on the amino-terminal side of Asp , thus
releasing a 19-residue peptide that contains all the hydroxyl residues
on the carboxyl-terminal tail (45) (Fig. 7A).
The autoradiogram in Fig. 7B shows that neither
unbleached rhodopsin (lane2), bleached rhodopsin (lane4), or opsin (lane6) had P associated with them after removal of the
carboxyl-terminal 19 residues. Similarly, Fig. 7B shows
that bleached rhodopsin phosphorylated by rhodopsin kinase had no
associated P after removal of the carboxyl terminus (lane10), as reported previously(45) . Thus,
protein kinase C modifies exclusively the carboxyl terminus of
rhodopsin in its native membrane environment in vitro. This
result is consistent with in situ phosphorylation data that
revealed that rhodopsin is phosphorylated exclusively on the carboxyl
tail in the presence or absence of phorbol esters(12) . Proteolysis with trypsin, which cleaves after Lys to
release the carboxyl-terminal 9 residues(46) , was used to
further narrow down the domain phosphorylated by protein kinase C (Fig. 7A). Unbleached rhodopsin, bleached rhodopsin, or
opsin were phosphorylated by protein kinase C or rhodopsin kinase and
then treated with trypsin; 0.4 mol of phosphate were incorporated per
mol of bleached rhodopsin for both kinases (the substoichiometric
phosphorylation allowed determination of the initial phosphorylation
domain). The Western blot in Fig. 7C shows that limited
proteolysis by trypsin resulted in the formation of a fragment
migrating with an apparent molecular mass 1 kDa smaller than the native
enzyme, consistent with cleavage at Lys . The
susceptibility of all three forms of protein kinase C-phosphorylated
receptor to cleavage at Lys was similar (e.g. same amount of cleaved rhodopsin in lanes2, 6, and 10). Furthermore, the sensitivity to
trypsin of the protein kinase C-phosphorylated receptor (e.g.lanes1-4) was similar to that of
nonphosphorylated receptor (approximately 50% proteolysis in the
presence of 2 µg ml trypsin); however, note that
approximately 20% of the protein kinase C-phosphorylated receptor, but
not unphosphorylated receptor, was resistant to proteolysis at the
highest trypsin concentration. Thus, phosphorylation by protein kinase
C did not affect the accessibility of Lys to trypsin for
the majority of the receptor population. Ohguro et al.(8) have shown that phosphorylation at the adjacent
Ser , the primary phosphorylation site by rhodopsin
kinase, inhibits proteolysis at Lys . The autoradiogram in Fig. 7C shows that rhodopsin phosphorylated by protein
kinase C had significant P associated with it after
cleavage at Lys (e.g.lanes4, 8, and 12). In contrast, bleached rhodopsin
phosphorylated by rhodopsin kinase was significantly less sensitive to
proteolysis by trypsin (lanes17-20).
Importantly, any cleaved rhodopsin from the sample phosphorylated with
rhodopsin kinase was not radioactive (lane20). The
inability of trypsin to cleave receptor phosphorylated at Ser indicates that the primary phosphorylation site of protein kinase
C is not Ser ; protein kinase C-phosphorylated receptor is
cleaved at Lys . Rather the primary phosphorylation site
is on the carboxyl terminus between residues 330 and 337. Some
phosphorylation on the trypsin-sensitive domain is also catalyzed by
protein kinase C as well as minor phosphorylation at Ser (based on insensitivity of approximately 20% of the
phospho-rhodopsin to proteolysis at Lys ).
DISCUSSION
Table 1compares kinetic and structural parameters for
the phosphorylation of rhodopsin by protein kinase C and by rhodopsin
kinase. The most striking difference in the phosphorylation by the two
kinases is that protein kinase C does not discriminate between receptor
conformations or liganded state, whereas rhodopsin kinase
phosphorylates only bleached rhodopsin(5) . A second important
difference is the regulation of the two kinases; protein kinase C is
regulated by a second messenger, whereas rhodopsin kinase is regulated
by the conformation of its substrate. The most important similarity in
the effects of the two kinases is that both catalyze a desensitizing
phosphorylation of the visual receptor. Because both kinases have
similar consequences on rhodopsin function, the advantage of having two
different kinases would be if each were dominant under different
conditions(47) , perhaps allowing rhodopsin to be regulated
under a much broader range of illumination as well as by a heterologous
pathway.
Ca and Lipid RegulationThe protein
kinase C in rod outer segments that catalyzes the phosphorylation of
rhodopsin is a member of the Ca -regulated protein
kinase Cs(29) . In situ phosphorylation studies have
revealed that protein kinase C will only phosphorylate rhodopsin in
retinas that have been exposed to some light(12) , yet
Ca levels in rod outer segments drop upon
illumination. This seeming discrepancy may be explained by the nature
of the allosteric regulation of protein kinase C by lipid and
Ca (36) . Specifically, the concentration of
Ca required for activation decreases with increasing
concentrations of lipid (see Fig. 4), similar to other
allosterically regulated proteins such as calcineurin, where the
requirement for Ca decreases with increasing
concentrations of another allosteric regulator,
calmodulin(48) . Indeed, the concentration of membrane is so
high in rod outer segments (approximately 200 mM phospholipid(49) ) that consideration of the reported
binding constants of conventional protein kinase Cs for lipid reveals
that most of the protein kinase C will be membrane-bound if
diacylglycerol is present but the Ca concentration is
below the K of protein kinase C for the cation.
Specifically, Mosior and Epand (40) have shown that the
apparent association constant for Ca -regulated
protein kinase Cs for membranes containing 20 mol % phosphatidylserine
and 1 mol % diacylglycerol is 30 M in the
presence of physiological ionic strength and Ca concentrations below the K . Given that the
apparent association constant is equal to the ratio of membrane-bound
protein kinase C to free protein kinase C divided by the total lipid
concentration (see (50) ), then an apparent association
constant of 30 M and lipid concentration of
0.2 M, 86% of the protein kinase C would be membrane-bound.
With more diacylglycerol, the fraction membrane-bound would be even
greater. Thus, the association constant of protein kinase C for
membranes containing 1 mol % diacylglycerol and physiological amounts
of phosphatidylserine is sufficiently high in the complete absence of
Ca that membrane-binding, and hence activation, can
occur independently of Ca . What is more relevant is
that the apparent association constant in the absence of diacylglycerol
is over 2 orders of magnitude
lower(39, 41, 50) , indicating that no
significant amount of protein kinase C would be membrane-bound in the
absence of diacylglycerol. Thus, given the high membrane density in rod
outer segments, the key to the regulation of rhodopsin phosphorylation
by protein kinase C in situ is likely to depend on whether or
not diacylglycerol has been produced.
Phosphorylation DomainBoth rhodopsin kinase and
protein kinase C modify exclusively the carboxyl-terminal tail of
rhodopsin. However, the stoichiometry of the phosphorylation and the
sites phosphorylated by the two kinases differ. Protein kinase C
catalyzes the incorporation of one mol of phosphate/mol of receptor,
whereas rhodopsin kinase catalyzes the incorporation of up to 9 mol of
phosphate/mol of receptor in vitro(51) , although
recent evidence suggests that only 3 of these are physiologically
relevant (8) . Second, sensitivity to proteolysis by trypsin
indicates that the primary phosphorylation site of rhodopsin kinase,
Ser (7, 8, 9) , is not modified
significantly by protein kinase C. Rather, most of the phosphate
incorporated by reaction with protein kinase C is between Asp and Val . Phosphoamino acid analysis by Kelleher and
Johnson (13) indicated that protein kinase C phosphorylated
rhodopsin primarily on Thr residues; 2 such residues are present in the
stretch from 330 to 337.Identification of the major phosphorylation
site by protein kinase C as being on the amino-terminal half of the
carboxyl tail supports in situ findings. Hyperactivation of
protein kinase C in the intact rat retina by treatment with phorbol
esters results in an increase in the phosphorylation of rhodopsin
exposed to a brief flash of light(11, 12) .
Proteolytic digests of receptor phosphorylated in situ revealed that the increased phosphorylation resulting from phorbol
ester treatment occurred on a trypsin-resistant (11) but
Asp-N-sensitive (12) domain. Thus, protein kinase C modifies
the same domain of rhodopsin in situ and in vitro.
Phosphorylation by Rhodopsin Kinase and Protein Kinase
CThe phosphorylation of rhodopsin by rhodopsin kinase or
protein kinase C may have the same functional consequence: deactivation
of the receptor. Phosphorylation by rhodopsin kinase reduces the rate
of light-dependent coupling to transducin and hence the activation of
the phosphodiesterase(52) , an inhibition that is enhanced upon
binding of arrestin(10) . Similarly, a report by Kelleher and
Johnson (13) and our own preliminary data (53) indicate
that rhodopsin phosphorylated by protein kinase C couples to transducin
with a reduced rate. The inhibition of G protein-coupling as a result
of phosphorylation on the membrane-proximal half of the C terminus is
consistent with a report that a synthetic peptide of this domain of the
receptor interacts directly with transducin(54) . Whether
arrestin binding is promoted by the protein kinase C-catalyzed
phosphorylation remains to be examined. For other G protein-coupled
receptors, phosphorylation by G protein-coupled receptor kinases
requires binding of arrestin-like proteins for maximal desensitization,
whereas the uncoupling resulting from phosphorylation by second
messenger-regulated kinases is unaffected by arrestin-like
proteins(55) .The phosphorylation of rhodopsin by protein
kinase C is analogous to the heterologous phosphorylation of other G
protein-coupled receptors. Notable similarities are as follows. 1) The
phosphorylation by protein kinase C is independent of receptor
conformation, similar to the ligand-independent phosphorylation of the
adrenergic receptor by protein kinases A or C or the
ligand-independent phosphorylation of the muscarinic acetylcholine
receptor by protein kinase C. This contrasts with the ligand-dependent
homologous phosphorylation catalyzed by G protein-coupled receptor
kinases. 2) One mol of phosphate is incorporated per mol of receptor,
similar to the phosphorylation of only one or two sites of the
adrenergic receptor by protein kinases A or C, and contrasting with the
multiple phosphorylations catalyzed by G protein-coupled receptor
kinases. 3) The phosphorylation catalyzed by protein kinase C is
regulated by a second messenger, diacylglycerol; the heterologous
phosphorylation of the adrenergic receptor is also stimulated by
a second messenger, cAMP. This contrasts with the regulation of G
protein-coupled receptor kinases by substrate conformation. 4) The
major phosphorylation site by protein kinase C differs from that of
rhodopsin kinase, although it is also on the carboxyl terminus. Protein
kinases A and C modify the adrenergic receptor on the carboxyl
tail of this receptor (as well as on the third cytoplasmic loop), but
on a residue proximal to the membrane span that is not a
phosphorylation site by G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Phosphorylation of rhodopsin by two differently regulated kinases
may allow rhodopsin to respond to a much broader range of stimuli.
Whether protein kinase C is activated directly in response to light on
the photoreceptor cell or whether its activation arises heterologously
from activation of another signaling pathway remains to be determined.
FOOTNOTES
- *
- This work was supported by National Eye
Institute Grant EY08820, by a grant from the Fight For Sight Research
Division of the National Society to Prevent Blindness (to N. M. G.),
and a National Science Foundation Young Investigator award (to A. C.
N.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by
the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby
marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18
U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide
sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the
GenBank(TM)/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s)
L39909[GenBank]. - §
- Present
address: Dept. of Pharmacology, University of California at San Diego,
La Jolla, CA 92093-0640.
- ¶
- To whom
correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 619-534-4527; Fax:
619-534-6833.
- (
) - The abbreviations used are: PMA,
phorbol myristate acetate; BAEE, N
-benzoyl-L-arginine ethyl ester; DTT,
dithiothreitol; MOPS,
3-[N-morpholino]propanesulfonic acid; PAGE,
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. - (
) - As an
example of high concentrations of one activator reducing the regulation
by Ca
, rhodopsin reconstituted in membranes
containing 95 mol % phosphatidylserine and 5 mol % diacylglycerol is
phosphorylated by protein kinase C in the absence of
Ca (11) . - (
) - L. M.
Keranen and A. C. Newton, unpublished data.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Mark Hallett and Sassan Azarian for isolation
of rod outer segment membranes, Marcella Sackett and Steve Orr for
assistance in purifying protein kinase C, and Claude Klee for the
computer program to calculate free Ca .
REFERENCES
- Hausdorff, W. P., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1990) FASEB J. 4, 2881-2889
[Abstract]
- Dawson, T. M., Arriza, J. L., Jaworsky, D. E., Borisy, F. F., Attramadal, H., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Ronnett, G. V. (1993) Science 259, 825-829
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schleicher, S., Boekhoff, I., Arriza, J., Lefkowitz, R. J., and Breer, H. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 1420-1424
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Richardson, R. M., Ptasienski, J., and Hosey, M. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 10127-10132
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Inglese, J., Freedman, N. J., Koch, W. J., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 23735-23738
[Free Full Text]
- Hargrave, P. A., and McDowell, J. H. (1992) FASEB J. 6, 2323-2331
[Abstract]
- McDowell, J. H., Nawrocki, J. P., and Hargrave, P. A. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 4968-4974
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ohguro, H., Palczewski, K., Ericsson, L. H., Walsh, K. A., and Johnson, R. S. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 5718-5724
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Papac, D. I., Oatis, J. E., Jr., Crouch, R. K., and Knapp, D. R. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 5930-5934
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wilden, U., Hall, S. W., and Kühn, H. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 1174-1178
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Newton, A. C., and Williams, D. S. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 17725-17728
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Newton, A. C., and Williams, D. S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18181-18186
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kelleher, D. J., and Johnson, G. L. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 4749-4757
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ghalayini, A. J., and Anderson, R. E. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 124, 503-506
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hayashi, F., and Amakawa, T. (1985) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 128, 954-959
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Das, N. D., Yoshioka, T., Samuelson, D., Cohen, R. J., and Shichi, H. (1987) Cell Struct. Funct. 12, 471-481
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Millar, F. A., Fisher, S. C., Muir, C. A., Edwards, E., and Hawthorne, J. N. (1988) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 970, 205-211
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Khovratovich, V. I., Grigoriev, I. V., Korotkina, V. P., Sheiko, L. M., and Volotovski, I. D. (1991) Biol. Membr. (Russia) 4, 1392-1403
- Gehm, B. D., and McConnell, D. G. (1990) Biochemistry 29, 5447-5452
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ghalayini, A. J., Tarver, A. P., Mackin, W. M., Koutz, C. A., and Anderson, R. E. (1991) J. Neurochem. 57, 1405-1412
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ferreira, P. A., Shortridge, R. D., and Pak, W. L. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6042-6046
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Chakravarthy, B. R., Bussey, A., Whitfield, J. F., Sikorska, M., Williams, R. E., and Durkin, J. P. (1991) Anal. Biochem. 196, 144-150
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Azarian, S. M., Schlamp, C. L., and Williams, D. S. (1993) J. Cell Sci. 105, 787-798
[Abstract]
- Lee, R. H., Ting, T. D., Lieberman, B. S., Tobias, D. E., Lolley, R. N., and Ho, Y.-K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 25104-25112
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hong, K., and Hubbell, W. L. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 69, 2617-2621
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bartlett, G. R. (1959) J. Biol. Chem. 234, 466-468
[Free Full Text]
- Bligh, E. G., and Dyer, W. J. (1959) Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, 911-917
- McDowell, J. H. (1993) Methods Neurosci. 15, 123-130
- Newton, A. C. (1993) Methods Neurosci. 15, 261-270
- Orr, J. W., Keranen, L. M., and Newton, A. C. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15263-15266
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hofmann, K. P., Pulvermüller, A., Buczylko, J., Van Hooser, P., and Palczewski, K. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15701-15706
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Thorpe, G. H. G., Kricka, L. J., Mosely, S. B., and Whitehead, T. P. (1985) Clin. Chem. 31, 1335-1341
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Newton, A. C., and Koshland, D. E., Jr. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 14909-14915
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Leatherbarrow, R. J. (1992) GraFit Version 3.0 , Erithacus Software Ltd., Staines, United Kingdom
- Jean, T., and Klee, C. B. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 16414-16420
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Newton, A. C. (1993) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 22, 1-25
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Newton, A. C., and Koshland, D. E., Jr. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 10185-10188
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kawamura, S., Hisatomi, O., Kayada, S., Tokunaga, F., and Kuo, C.-H. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14579-14582
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Newton, A. C., and Keranen, L. M. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 6651-6658
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mosior, M., and Epand, R. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13798-13805
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Orr, J. W., and Newton, A. C. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 4667-4673
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Burns, D. J., Bloomenthal, J., Lee, M.-H., and Bell, R. M. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 12044-12051
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Loomis, C. R., and Bell, R. M. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 1682-1692
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Palczewski, K., McDowell, J. H., and Hargrave, P. A. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 14067-14073
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Palczewski, K., Buczylko, J., Kaplan, M. W., Polans, A. S., and Crabb, J. W. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 12949-12955
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Miller, J. L., and Dratz, E. A. (1984) Vision Res. 24, 1509-1521
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Newton, A. C., and Williams, D. S. (1993) Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 275-277
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Stemmer, P. M., and Klee, C. B. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 6859-6866
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Daemen, F. J. M. (1973) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 300, 255-288
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mosior, M., and Epand, R. M. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 66-75
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wilden, U., and Kühn, H. (1982) Biochemistry 21, 3014-3022
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Miller, J. L., Fox, D. A., and Litman, B. J. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 4983-4988
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Williams, D. S., Schlamp, C. L., Greene, N. M., and Newton, A. C. (1993) Invest. Ophthalmol. & Visual Sci. 34, 1361
- Phillips, W. J., and Cerione, R. A. (1994) Biochem. J. 299, 351-357
- Lohse, M. J., Andexinger, S., Pitcher, J., Trukawinski, S., Codina, J., Faure, J.-P., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 8558-8564
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Palczewski, K., McDowell, J. H., and Hargrave, P. A. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 2306-2313
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. P. Udovichenko, A. C. Newton, and D. S. Williams
Regulation of the Phosphorylation State of Rhodopsin by Dopamine
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 27, 1998;
273(13):
7181 - 7184.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Zhang, C. D. Sports, S. Osawa, and E. R. Weiss
Rhodopsin Phosphorylation Sites and Their Role in Arrestin Binding
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 6, 1997;
272(23):
14762 - 14768.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Greene, D. S. Williams, and A. C. Newton
Identification of Protein Kinase C Phosphorylation Sites on Bovine Rhodopsin
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 18, 1997;
272(16):
10341 - 10344.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. P. Udovichenko, A. C. Newton, and D. S. Williams
Contribution of Protein Kinase C to the Phosphorylation of Rhodopsin in Intact Retinas
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 21, 1997;
272(12):
7952 - 7959.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-W. Peng, S. G. Rhee, W.-P. Yu, Y.-K. Ho, T. Schoen, G. J. Chader, and K.-W. Yau
Identification of components of a phosphoinositide signaling pathway in retinal rod outer segments
PNAS,
March 4, 1997;
94(5):
1995 - 2000.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Binder, T. M. O'Connor, M. D. Bownds, and V. Y. Arshavsky
Phosphorylation of Non-bleached Rhodopsin in Intact Retinas and Living Frogs
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 16, 1996;
271(33):
19826 - 19830.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Huber, P. Sander, and R. Paulsen
Phosphorylation of the InaD Gene Product, a Photoreceptor Membrane Protein Required for Recovery of Visual Excitation
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 17, 1996;
271(20):
11710 - 11717.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Ohguro, M. Rudnicka-Nawrot, X. Zhao, J. A. Taylor, K. A. Walsh, and K. Palczewski
Structural and Enzymatic Aspects of Rhodopsin Phosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 1, 1996;
271(9):
5215 - 5224.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Hu, G.-F. Jang, C. W. Cowan, T. G. Wensel, and K. Palczewski
Phosphorylation of RGS9-1 by an Endogenous Protein Kinase in Rod Outer Segments
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 15, 2001;
276(25):
22287 - 22295.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|