Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stover, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lydon, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stover, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lydon, N. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 270, Number 26, Issue of June 30, pp. 15591-15597, 1995
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Src Phosphorylation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor at Novel Sites Mediates Receptor Interaction with Src and P85 (*)

David R. Stover (§) , Michael Becker , Janis Liebetanz , Nicholas B. Lydon

From the (1)Pharmaceutical Division, Research Department, Ciba Geigy Limited, K125.4.20, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

Following ligand binding, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGF-R) autophosphorylates itself on tyrosine residues located in its carboxyl terminus; in vitro, three sites are highly phosphorylated, while two other sites are phosphorylated to lesser extents. In the presence of the Src protein-tyrosine kinase, in vitro phosphorylation of the minor autophosphorylation sites was increased, and four additional residues were phosphorylated. Following EGF stimulation, two (Tyr-891 and Tyr-920) were found to be phosphorylated in a colorectal cell line (DLD-1) and in a breast tumor cell line (MCF7). The remaining in vitro sites were not found to be highly phosphorylated in vivo. The sequences surrounding Tyr-891 and Tyr-920 match the reported consensus binding sequences for the SH2 domains of Src and the regulatory domain of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (p85), respectively. In vitro, both of these proteins were found to bind to Src-phosphorylated EGF-R with 100-fold greater affinity than to autophosphorylated EGF-R, demonstrating that Src creates new sites for SH2 binding. Furthermore, Csk-inactivated Src was activated by interaction with Src-phosphorylated EGF-R but not by autophosphorylated EGF-R. Upon EGF treatment of MCF7 or three colorectal carcinoma cell lines (WiDr, DLD-1, and LS174T), the EGF-R coimmunoprecipitated with both p85 and Src. Evidence is also presented that suggests that an EGF-R-related protein, ErbB2, may be involved in similar Src-mediated interactions. These data demonstrate that EGF-R is phosphorylated in vivo at non-autophosphorylation sites and that these novel sites can act as docking sites for Src, P85, and potentially other SH2-containing proteins. In addition, the data suggest a tyrosine phosphatase-independent mechanism for the elevation of Src activity in cells exposed to growth factors. Overexpression of Src, EGF-R, and/or ErbB2 in breast and colorectal tumor cells suggests the potential that such interactions may contribute to the transformed phenotype of these carcinomas.


INTRODUCTION

The cellular events that result from extracellular signaling by growth factors are initiated primarily by members of the transmembrane protein-tyrosine kinase family (for review, see Ullrich and Schlessinger(1990)). Typically, these receptor kinases dimerize upon binding ligand, which results in enzyme activation and the subsequent inter- and/or intra-molecular autophosphorylation on tyrosine residues. These receptor autophosphorylation sites act as docking sites for a wide range of regulatory molecules, each of which contain at least one Src homology 2 (SH2) domain that mediates interaction with the receptor (for reviews, see Koch et al.(1991) and Cantley et al.(1991)). Facilitation of substrate phosphorylation, regulation of enzymatic activity, and alterations in subcellular localization are three documented effects of SH2-mediated docking (Sugimoto et al., 1994; Uchida et al., 1994; Moran et al., 1991; Vega et al., 1992; and Pronk et al., 1993).

Five sites of autophosphorylation have been identified in the EGF-R,()three major (Tyr-1068, Tyr-1148, and Tyr-1173) and two minor (Tyr-992 and Tyr-1086) (Downward et al., 1984; Hsuan et al., 1989; Margolis et al., 1989; and Walton et al., 1990). Several SH2-containing proteins have been demonstrated to bind to one or more of these sites both in vitro and in vivo (Grb2, phospholipase C-, SHC, Syp, and GTPase-activating protein) (Batzer et al., 1994; Margolis et al., 1990; Rotin et al., 1992; Feng et al., 1994; Xiao et al., 1994). Recently, an unprecedented collaboration of laboratories has undertaken a thorough survey of the consensus binding sequences for many of the SH2 domains (Songyang et al., 1993, 1994). They have found that the SH2 domains can generally be placed into families of related binding specificities, with the three residues on the carboxy side of the phosphotyrosine having the greatest influence on affinity. However, binding of SH2-containing proteins to whole proteins appears to be less predictable than the interactions between isolated SH2 domains and simple peptides (Soler et al., 1994).

Other proteins have been reported to bind to the EGF-R, but the site or sites of binding have not been identified. Recently, the prototype SH2-containing protein, pp60 (Src) was reported to associate with the EGF-R (also known as ErbB1) and a related protein, ErbB2, in a breast tumor cell line (Luttrell et al., 1994). This correlates with evidence that overexpression of Src enhances the mitogenic response of cells to EGF (Chang et al., 1993). However, none of the autophosphorylation sites in the EGF-R are similar to the reported consensus binding sequence for Src-SH2 (pTyr-acidic-acidic-hydrophobic) (Songyang et al., 1993). Similarly, the regulatory domain of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (P85) has also been reported to bind EGF-R, but none of the autophosphorylated sites match its consensus sequence either (pYXXM) (Songyang et al., 1993; Hu et al., 1992; McGlade et al., 1992). There would seem to be three possible explanations for these findings: 1) these observed bindings are artifacts and are not physiologically important, 2) consensus sequences based on peptides are not reliable predictors of protein binding or, 3) there may be other tyrosine residues within the EGF-R that are phosphorylated and can bind SH2-containing proteins.

While we do not discount the possibility that the first two explanations may be valid for some of the confusion in the literature, in this report we show evidence that Src can phosphorylate the EGF-R on novel sites in vitro, that Src and P85 preferentially associate with the EGF-R after it has been phosphorylated by Src, that these Src-phosphorylated sites (including consensus binding sites for Src and P85) are phosphorylated in cells in response to EGF, that P85 and Src bind to the EGF-R in these cells in an EGF-dependent manner, and that Csk-inactivated Src is reactivated upon binding to the Src phosphorylated EGF-R. In addition, ErbB2, a closely related receptor kinase, is also phosphorylated by Src in vitro. The P85 and Src consensus binding sites found in the EGF-R are highly conserved in ErbB2, suggesting similar SH2 interactions may exist with the EGF-R growth factor receptor family. This evidence suggests the possible involvement of these interactions in breast and colorectal carcinomas.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell Culture

MCF7 breast tumor cells were a gift from Dr. N. Hynes (Friedrich Miescher Institute, Basel, Switzerland), while DLD-1, WiDr, and LS174T colorectal tumor cells were a gift from Dr. T. Hall (Ciba-Geigy Ltd., Basel, Switzerland). These cells were grown at 37 °C with 6% CO in Dulbecco's modified essential medium containing 10% fetal calf serum. All tissue culture reagents were from Life Technologies, Inc. For radiolabeling cells, 0.5 mCi of inorganic P was added per 10-cm plate of cells at 70% confluence after 8 h of serum starvation. After 4 h, the cells were treated with 50 ng/ml EGF and 10 min later lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 200 mM NaVO, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.2% Nonidet P-40, 0.05% SDS, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). The same procedure was used for non-radioactive immunoprecipitations, excluding the addition of P.

Preparation of ErbB2, EGF-R, p60, and Csk-inactivated Src

EGF-R and ErbB2 truncation mutants, including only the cytoplasmic portion of the proteins, were expressed in the baculovirus-Sf9 insect cell system and purified as previously described (McGlynn et al., 1992; Guy et al., 1992).

Src, containing a glycine to alanine substitution at position 2 to prevent myristylation, was expressed using the baculovirus-Sf9 cell system and purified essentially as previously described (Lydon et al., 1992). The purified enzyme was dephosphorylated by addition of calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (Boehringer Mannheim, 100 units/mg of Src). The reaction proceeded for 4 h at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C in 25 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM MgCl, 1 mM ZnCl. Dephosphorylated Src was isolated by separation on a 5/5 Mono-Q column (Pharmacia).

Csk-inactivated Src was produced by phosphorylating Src with Csk (a kind gift from Dr. Maria Ruzzene and Prof. L. A. Pinna, Padova, Italy), a kinase known to specifically phosphorylate Tyr-527 of human Src. The conditions for this reaction (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 6 mM MnCl, 100 µM ATP, 0.02% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM dithiothreitol) also allow extensive autophosphorylation to occur. The heterogeneous mixture of phosphorylated forms was separated on a Mono-Q column as described (Stover et al., 1994). A homogeneous peak containing inactive, tyrosine-phosphorylated Src was designated Csk-inactivated Src.

Kinase Reactions

To phosphorylate synthetic peptides, 1 nmol of peptide was phosphorylated with 1 µg of Src for 1 h at room temperature in 50 µl of kinase buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM MgCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and 200 µM [P]ATP). In vitro autophosphorylation and Src phosphorylation of the EGF-R were performed under the same conditions except that the proportion of Src to EGF-R was approximately 1:10 by weight.

To determine phosphorylation of the receptor protein-tyrosine kinases (RPTKs) by Src and of Src by the RPTKs, specific inhibitors of the target kinase being phosphorylated were used. 10 µM of CGP 46251 or CGP 47130 were used to abolish autophosphorylation of the EGF-R or ErbB2, respectively, without effecting phosphorylation by Src (). Similarly, 10 µM CGP 59272 completely inhibited Src without effecting phosphorylation by EGF-R or ErbB2 kinases ().

Immunoprecipitation and Western Blots

Cell lysates were precleared by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm in a Sorval SS-34 rotor. ErbB2, EGF-R, or Src were immunoprecipitated using 5 µg of -EGF-R antibody (monoclonal antibody F4, Boehringer Mannheim, Germany) or -Src antibody (monoclonal antibody 327, Oncogene Science) and 50 µl of a slurry of protein G-Sepharose (Pharmacia, Upsala, Sweden). Immune complexes were washed three times in 10 ml of RIPA buffer at room temperature for 10 min on a revolving disk.

Cell lysates and immunoprecipitated proteins were separated in a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide mini-gel and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using a horizontal semi-dry electroblotter (JKA-Biotech). An alkaline phosphatase detection system using the fast red substrate (Pierce) or a peroxidase-catalyzed enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham, United Kingdom) detection system were used for immunodetection.

Phosphopeptide Mapping

Seven sites of phosphorylation on the EGF-R, following treatment with Src, were identified by mass spectrometry and synthetic peptide mapping (data not shown). These seven sites were then verified to be phosphorylated in vivo by demonstrating that a mixed pool of these seven phosphopeptides comigrated with peptides generated from EGF-R from EGF-stimulated MCF7 cells. EGF-R or ErbB2 were phosphorylated in the presence of [P]ATP (as above) or were immunoprecipitated from cells as described above, and the proteins were then isolated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, excised from the gel, and washed in 50% acetonitrile for 4 h at room temperature. Peptides generated from in vivo labeled proteins were then treated with protein phosphatase 2 to remove phosphate from serine and threonine residues. The completion of this reaction was verified by phosphoamino acid analysis (not shown). After air drying, the gel slice was rehydrated in 100 mM NHCO containing 5 µg of trypsin and 1 µg of endoproteinase Lys-C. The digestion was left to proceed overnight at 30 °C, and the peptides were then eluted by rocking in 50% acetonitrile for 4 h. Synthetic peptides were phosphorylated as described above, separated from the other reaction ingredients by reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography on a 2.2 100-mm C18 column (Vydac).

Mapping of phosphopeptides was performed according to the protocol supplied with the HTLE-7000 peptide mapping system (CBS Scientific Co.), with the exception that P was used in place of P. In brief, after lyophilization, the peptides were resuspended in 10 µl of pH 1.9 buffer (2.2% formic acid and 7.8% acetic acid). 1-5 µl (5000 cpm) of the sample were spotted on cellulose TLC plates (Merck), and electrophoresis at pH 1.9 and 1000 V proceeded for 50 min. After drying, the plate was then placed in a chromatography tank containing phospho-chromatography buffer (37.5% n-butanol, 25% pyridine, and 7.5% acetic acid) for 12-16 h for separation in the second dimension. Phosphopeptides were detected by autoradiography and with a phosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). Synthetic peptides were purchased from Genosys Biotechnologies, Inc.

Src Kinase Assay

To determine the effect on Src activity of association with the EGF-R, Src was incubated with autophosphorylated EGF-R or Src-phosphorylated EGF-R. 10 µM CGP 46251 was then added to block EGF-R from interfering with the assay of Src kinase activity. Src was added to 50% the concentration of EGF-R (50 nM based on a Bradford protein assay). The activity of Src was then assessed using 1 mM angiotensin II or 1 mg/ml enolase as a substrate in kinase buffer including 10 µM [P]ATP. Both assays yielded similar results; however, the data presented are using enolase as a substrate. After 10 min, the reaction was stopped by addition of 10 µl of acetic acid. Phosphate incorporation into angiotensin II was then measured, by spotting 10 µl of the reaction mix onto P81 paper (Whatman), washing 3 times in 0.5% phosphoric acid, and measuring radioactivity in 1 ml of scintillation fluid.

Determination of Relative SH2 Binding Affinities

A GST-P85-SH2 fusion protein was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. The relative binding affinities of this protein and of the whole Src protein to differentially phosphorylated forms of the EGF-R were determined as follows: EGF-R was autophosphorylated or phosphorylated by Src as described above except Src was only present at 1/50th the concentration of the EGF-R. The kinase reactions were stopped by the addition of EDTA to five times the concentration of divalent metal (50 mM). Then, the reactions were diluted to one of three concentrations, 1, 10, or 100 nM, simply by adjusting the volume to 50 µl, 500 µl, or 5 ml. An equal amount of Src or P85-SH2 was added to each tube, making the final concentration of these proteins 1, 10, or 100 nM as well. After a 30-min incubation at 4 °C, the volume of each tube was adjusted to 10 ml, and EGF-R was immunoprecipitated (20 µg of -EGF-R antibody, clone F4 (Boehringer Mannheim), and 100 µl of protein G-Sepharose). The immune complexes were boiled in SDS-sample buffer, and Western blots were incubated with either -Src (monoclonal antibody 327) or -GST (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) antibodies as appropriate.


RESULTS

Src Phosphorylates EGF-R and ErbB2 at Nonautophosphorylation Sites

Recent reports that Src can associate with EGF-R and ErbB2 in mammary tumor cell lines (Luttrell et al., 1994) stimulated us to study this interaction in greater depth in vitro. However, we found that Src did not bind to autophosphorylated EGF-R or ErbB2 proteins (Fig. 1). Since the recombinant EGF-R we used was a truncated protein (lacking the extracellular and transmembrane domains), we postulated that perhaps our protein had an altered autophosphorylation pattern. Therefore, two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping of trypsin and endoproteinase Lys-C cleaved, autophosphorylated recombinant EGF-R was performed and compared with peptide maps from the holoenzyme. Three dominant spots were observed, while two additional spots were visible after extended exposure (Fig. 2). Three dominant spots were identified as phosphopeptides that contain pTyr-1068, pTyr-1148, and pTyr-1173 by direct comigration of P-labeled synthetic peptides. The doublet where the pTyr-1068 phosphopeptide migrated is probably due to differential digestion by trypsin since a lysine and arginine are adjacent on the amino-terminal end of this peptide. Because trypsin does not cleave amino-terminal residues efficiently, a mixture of two cleavage products would be produced. Therefore, the major sites identified in vitro are the same sites reported to be the major sites of EGF-R autophosphorylation, both in vitro and in vivo, indicating that the low binding affinity of Src was not due to a non-physiological in vitro autophosphorylation pattern.


Figure 1: Association of Src with EGF-R and ErbB2. 5 µg of each RPTK were either allowed to autophosphorylate or were incubated with 100 ng of Src in the presence of an inhibitor for the appropriate RPTK (see Table I). 20 mM EDTA was added to stop the phosphorylation reactions, and 5 µg of Src was added to each. After rocking for 15 min at 4 °C, the RPTKs were immunoprecipitated and washed three times for 20 min each time in Tris buffer, containing 1% Nonidet P-40 and 200 mM NaCl, and once in 20 mM Tris, pH 7.5. Immunoblotting, using an anti-Src monoclonal antibody 327, determined the presence of Src in the immune complexes. As controls, the total amount of Src and 1/10th of the Src added to each reaction were loaded into the first two lanes, as indicated.




Figure 2: Phosphopeptide maps of EGF-R autophosphorylated or phosphorylated by Src (A and B, respectively). EGF-R was phosphorylated, and tryptic peptides were generated as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Seven P-phosphorylated peptides, specifically synthesized to be identical to tryptic fragments of EGF-R that include the tyrosines reported to be or identified to be phosphorylated during Src treatment of EGF-R, were pooled and mapped in a similar fashion. The identity of each peptide was determined by mixing a pool of cold phosphorylated peptides with a single P-phosphorylated peptide and matching the radioactivity with a particular ninhydrin-stained spot. D shows the phosphopeptide map of trypsin-cleaved EGF-R immunoprecipitated from MCF7. Peptides from C and D were pooled and run together (E) to verify that the seven synthetic peptides comigrate with the in vivo generated peptides, indicating that they are indeed the same. The only difference in the preparation of EGF-R immunoprecipitated from cells was that it was treated with the serine/threonine phosphatase PP2a to remove any seryl- or threonyl-attached phosphate. All the maps were exposed to a PhosphorImager plate for 15 h and then scanned by a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics). The intensity range for all of the samples is set to 0.10-999.87. The origin of each map is marked by a + sign.



The platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGF-R) has been demonstrated to phosphorylate Src (Gould and Hunter, 1988). We therefore tested the ability of EGF-R and ErbB2 to phosphorylate Src. Neither kinase was able to do this (Fig. 3B); however, Src was found to strongly phosphorylate both the EGF-R and ErbB2 proteins (Fig. 3A). This finding opened up the possibility that Src creates its own binding site on these receptor kinases. This appears to be the case as Src was able to bind to Src-phosphorylated EGF-R and ErbB2 but not to these proteins after simple autophosphorylation (Fig. 1). In these experiments, EGF-R and ErbB2 enzyme activities were inhibited by selective protein tyrosine kinase inhibitors that completely abolish their activity at concentrations that do not effect phosphorylation by Src, ensuring that the phosphorylation of these RPTKs is due to Src and not to a change in autophosphorylation caused by the presence of Src.


Figure 3: A, the ability of Src to phosphorylate EGF-R and ErbB2 was determined. 5 µg of receptor were incubated with [P]ATP and, where indicated, an appropriate inhibitor (10 µM CGP 46251 or 10 µM CGP 47130) and 100 ng of Src. The proteins were separated on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and visualized by x-ray autoradiography. B, the ability of each of the RPTKs to phosphorylate Src was determined in a similar fashion. 5 µg of Src were incubated with [P]ATP and, where indicated, a specific inhibitor of Src (10 µM CGP 59272) and 100 ng of the indicated receptor tyrosine kinase. The proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis and visualized by autoradiography. PTK, protein-tyrosine kinase.



Two-dimensional phosphopeptide mapping of Src-phosphorylated EGF-R revealed that Src phosphorylates the three major EGF-R autophosphorylation sites, two minor sites, which have previously been reported to be autophosphorylated (Tyr-992 and Tyr-1086), and five novel sites. In our hands, autophosphorylation resulted in a phosphate to protein ratio of 2.8, while Src phosphorylation of EGF-R resulted in a ratio of 6.4. Three of these additional sites were identified as (Tyr-845, Tyr-891, and Tyr-920) by mass spectrometry and subsequently by comigration of phosphorylated synthetic peptides to the phosphopeptides from EGF-R (data not shown). These three sites are located within the carboxyl-terminal portion of the kinase domain rather than in the tail where the autophosphorylation sites are found. The remaining two spots were not identified but are located within the carboxyl-terminal tail, since a GST-EGF-R tail fusion protein (amino acids 952-1210 of the EGF-R) phosphorylated by Src also yielded these phosphopeptides (data not shown). There are only three tyrosines in the tail not already known to be autophosphorylated; therefore, these two sites represent at least two out of the three remaining tyrosines within the tail.

Because in vitro phosphorylation is not always an indicator of physiologically relevant events, we examined the phosphorylation of the EGF-R in its cellular context. Immunoprecipitated EGF-R from a breast tumor cell line (MCF7, Fig. 2) and a colorectal tumor cell line (DLD-1, data not shown) was phosphorylated on Tyr-891 and Tyr-920, as well as all of the autophosphorylation sites. Moreover, the phosphorylation of these sites was to a similar extent as the previously reported autophosphorylation sites. Closer analysis of the sequences surrounding these sites revealed that Tyr-891 is similar to the consensus binding sequence of the Src SH2 domain (), and Tyr-920 fits the consensus binding sequence of the SH2 domain of the P85 regulatory domain of PI3 kinase (Songyang et al., 1993). Since Src and P85 have both been reported to bind to EGF-R and none of the EGF-R autophosphorylation sites fit either of their consensus binding sequences, these new sites may be responsible for these interactions.

Because Src only bound to the Src-phosphorylated form of ErbB2, we looked to see if Src phosphorylates non-autophosphorylation sites in this closely related receptor (Fig. 4). Based on similarity to the EGF-R, the sites of autophosphorylation of ErbB2 can be predicted. The three major sites and one of the minor sites would all be found on only two tryptic peptides, with the fifth minor site comprising a third phosphopeptide. Our data suggest these predictions are correct, since phosphopeptide mapping revealed two major phosphopeptides and one minor form (Fig. 4A). At least four or five additional phosphopeptides are observed after ErbB2 phosphorylation with Src, indicating at least that many additional tyrosine residues are phosphorylated. The occurrence of these phosphorylations in vitro does not mean they would all occur in vivo. However, the three tyrosines that are phosphorylated by EGF-R in vivo are conserved in ErbB2. Thus, sites for binding of Src and P85 should be created if these sites are phosphorylated in vivo.


Figure 4: Phosphopeptide maps of autophosphorylated (A) or Src-phosphorylated (B) ErbB2.



Src and P85 Preferentially Bind to Src-phosphorylated EGF-R

To assess the importance of the nonautophosphorylation sites, the EGF-R was allowed to autophosphorylate or was phosphorylated by Src (in the presence of CGP 46251 to block EGF-R autophosphorylation, ). The relative binding affinities of Src and P85 to each of these forms of EGF-R was then assayed (Fig. 5). This assay depended upon dilution of equal quantities of proteins into different volumes to adjust the concentrations. Thus, 5 pmol of EGF-R and an equal amount of Src or P85 were diluted to 50 µl, 500 µl, and 5 ml to make concentrations of 100, 10, and 1 nM, respectively. Because this technique changes the concentration of both proteins simultaneously, it is not amenable to Michaelis-Menten kinetics; however, it effectively reveals differences in relative binding affinities. Src bound to Src-phosphorylated EGF-R (1 nM) at concentrations approximately 100-fold more dilute than it bound to autophosphorylated EGF-R (100 nM). P85 had a similar preference for Src-phosphorylated EGF-R (Fig. 5).


Figure 5: The relative affinity of full-length Src (A) or the amino-terminal SH2 domain of P85 (B) for either autophosphorylated (A and B, lanes 1-3) or Src-phosphorylated (A and B, lanes 4-6) EGF-R were examined.



Binding of Src and P85 to EGF-R was competed for by addition of phosphorylated synthetic peptides corresponding to phosphorylation sites on EGF-R. The two novel sites (Tyr-891 and Tyr-920), as well as the two minor autophosphorylation sites that appear to be enhanced in vivo (Tyr-992 and Tyr-1086), were used to try to compete for Src and P85 binding. The same type of binding assay as in Fig. 5was done in the presence of increasing amounts of one of the four peptides. P85 was preferentially competed away by the Tyr-920 site (LPQPPICTIDVpYMIMVK), K = 35 µM, while the other peptides did not inhibit binding up to 100 µM. Src was slightly preferentially competed by Tyr-891 (PpYDGIPASEISSILEK), K = 60 µM; however, Tyr-992 (K = 75 µM) and Tyr-920 (K = 80 µM) had similar competition kinetics. To test if Src and P85 are associated with EGF-R in vivo, cells were stimulated with EGF for 10 min or were left untreated, and then EGF-R was immunoprecipitated. Western blots of the immune complexes with monoclonal antibodies against Src or P85 revealed that they were associated with EGF-R in MCF7 cells in three colorectal carcinoma cell lines (DLD-1, WiDr, LS174T) and to a lesser extent in NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 6A). In each case, the interactions were only observed after treatment with EGF. In contrast, no Src or P85 were observed in EGF-R immune complexes from A431 cells. Because EGF-R is highly overexpressed in A431 cells, the proportion of EGF-R phosphorylated by Src may be too small to allow detection of associating proteins that are dependent on these non-autophosphorylated sites. Alternatively, this mechanism may be regulated in a cell type-specific manner.


Figure 6: A, association of Src with EGF-R was assessed in cells stimulated with EGF. EGF-R was immunoprecipitated from the indicated cells with a monoclonal antibody specific for a sequence within the cytoplasmic region of EGF-R (clone F4). The washed immune complexes were analyzed for Src association by Western blot using monoclonal antibody 327. B, similarly, the interaction of P85 with EGF-R, in the same cells, was analyzed by washing the polyvinylidene difluoride membranes from A in 10% acetic acid and then reimmunostaining with anti-P85 antibody.



Binding of proteins containing enzymatic domains to growth factor receptors by their SH2 domains has been observed to effect the activity of several enzymes (Stover et al., 1994; Lechleider et al., 1993; Moran et al., 1991). Therefore, the activity of Src was assayed in the presence of autophosphorylated or Src-phosphorylated EGF-R (Fig. 7). In this experiment, a selective EGF-R kinase inhibitor was used to block autophosphorylation of the Src-phosphorylated EGF-R and to block both autophosphorylated and Src-phosphorylated EGF-R from interfering with the assay of Src activity. Neither phosphorylated forms of the EGF-R had any impact on Src activity.


Figure 7: Graph demonstrating activation of Csk-inactivated Src in the presence of RPTKs after being either autophosphorylated or phosphorylated by Src. The activities of dephosphorylated Src and Csk-inactivated Src (pY527-Src) in the absence of receptors (lanes 1 and 2, respectively) are shown as references. The subsequent bars represent the activity of Csk-inactivated Src in the presence of the indicated RPTK. Appropriate RPTK inhibitors were included during the Src assays, so the contribution by the RPTKs was negligible (data not shown). Enolase was used as the substrate at a concentration of 1 mg/ml, and cpm incorporated was measured by spotting 10 µl of each reaction on P81 paper, followed by washing and scintillation counting. It should be noted that only approximately one-fifth of the total amount of Src was found to be associated with the receptors in immune complexes under similar conditions as those used here (see Fig. 1); therefore, the amount of reactivation of the bound fraction of Src may be much greater than that indicated.



We have recently demonstrated that dephosphorylated Src is not affected by addition of phosphopeptides that mimic the carboxyl-terminal regulatory tail of Src, but Csk-inactivated Src (phosphorylated at Tyr-527) is activated in the presence of such phosphotyrosine-containing peptides (Stover et al., 1994). Csk-inactivated Src was found to be activated 7-8-fold in the presence of Src-phosphorylated EGF-R, while it was unaffected by autophosphorylated EGF-R (Fig. 7).


DISCUSSION

The EGF receptor and ErbB2 have each been demonstrated to autophosphorylate multiple sites in vitro (Fig. 8). Kinase inactive mutants fail to phosphorylate these sites in response to ligand stimulation, suggesting that autophosphorylation also takes place in vivo. In this report, we demonstrate that a non-receptor tyrosine kinase, Src, is capable of phosphorylating each of these receptors to a high level. In vitro, Src phosphorylates all of the EGF-R autophosphorylation sites plus an additional five tyrosine residues. Two of these additional sites (Tyr-891 and Tyr-920) were observed to be phosphorylated in a colorectal carcinoma cell line (DLD-1) and in a breast tumor cell line (MCF-7). In cells that overexpress EGF-R (i.e. A431) autophosphorylation may predominate, thus explaining why these additional sites have been missed in the few previous studies that have mapped in vivo phosphotyrosine sites. Although EGF-R is overexpressed in several of the carcinoma cell lines used in this study, Src is also highly expressed (Masanori et al., 1990). The correlation of the overexpression of Src with phosphorylation of these non-autophosphorylated sites indicates that Src may be the endogenous kinase responsible for this phosphorylation. This conclusion is further supported by the observation that phosphorylation of these new sites is only observed under conditions where Src is found to associate with the EGF-R.


Figure 8: Schematic diagram of EGF-R and its EGF-induced phosphorylation sites. Five sites of autophosphorylation (Auto-P) within the carboxyl-terminal tail are indicated, as are two sites that are found to be phosphorylated in DLD-1 cells. Because these two sites are phosphorylated by Src but are not autophosphorylated in vitro, they are labeled as Src sites. Note that Src is capable of phosphorylating all of the indicated sites in vitro and increases the level of phosphorylation on the minor autophosphorylated sites (Tyr-992 and Tyr-1086) to the level of the major sites.



Wasilenko et al.(1991) have demonstrated that in cells transformed by pp60, the EGF-R is constitutively phosphorylated at nonautophosphorylation sites. Furthermore, phospholipase C- is also constitutively phosphorylated on tyrosine in these cells. Because phospholipase C- is an in vivo substrate of the EGF-R kinase, the authors concluded that the basal activity of EGF-R had been activated by pp60 phosphorylation. However, in our hands, phosphorylation of EGF-R by Src has no effect on EGF-R activity in vitro (data not shown). Therefore, we suggest that the constitutive phosphorylation of phospholipase C- in Src-transformed cells may be due to phosphorylation by Src itself, or phospholipase C- may be capable of binding to one of the sites of phosphorylation by Src; thus, it becomes a substrate for EGF-R in the absence of dimerization and autophosphorylation. Phospholipase C- has been shown to specifically bind to pTyr-992, a minor autophosphorylated site. In our hands, this site was a very minor site, barely visible above background on an overexposed film (not shown). However, after Src phosphorylation, this site was as highly phosphorylated as the major sites of autophosphorylation, correlating with our observations of EGF-R phosphorylation in vivo following EGF stimulation. These data suggest that phospholipase C- may actually bing to a predominantly non-autophosphorylated site. Whether this site is actually phosphorylated by Src or another kinase in vivo is still not certain.

Both Src and P85 have been found to bind to the EGF-R in previous reports, and our results add further evidence that this is indeed the case in the cell types examined in this study. However, none of the autophosphorylation sites of EGF-R fit the consensus binding sites for either Src or the P85 SH2 domains, and we observe only weak binding of these proteins to the autophosphorylated EGF-R. It would appear likely that it is more than an artifactual coincidence that, of the three non-autophosphorylated sites observed to be phosphorylated in cells, one is a text book example of a P85 binding site while another matches the binding requirements of Src-SH2 quite well. Furthermore, the sequences surrounding these two sites are far more conserved between EGF-R and ErbB2 than are any of the major autophosphorylation sites. Taken together, these observations make a strong argument for a physiological role for Src phosphorylation of these tyrosine residues.

It has recently been reported that the a carboxyl-terminal truncated EGF-R (that has its carboxyl-terminal tail including all known autophosphorylation sites removed) can still mediate EGF-induced proliferation and growth. However, when each of the individual autophosphorylation sites are mutated to phenylalanine, the EGF-R is unable to transduce a proliferative signal. Since truncation is a drastic alteration, it was surprising that it could retain more of its functionality. Our studies may suggest an explanation for this observation. Perhaps the three tyrosine residues phosphorylated by Src in the carboxyl terminus of the kinase domain are sufficient to mediate these effects of EGF. However, Src may not be able to phosphorylate these sites before the EGF-R tail has been autophosphorylated (i.e. the tail may fold over and block these sites, a suggestion for which there is some evidence (Gill et al., 1988)). Therefore, if the autophosphorylation sites are mutated, the tail cannot be phosphorylated; so, the remaining sites are blocked from being phosphorylated. On the other hand, truncation would completely remove the tail, leaving these sites open for phosphorylation by Src, and signaling from SH2 proteins that interact with these sites could still occur.

Coker et al.(1994) have recently reported that a kinase negative mutant of EGF-R retained the capacity to stimulate DNA synthesis upon EGF stimulation. This inactive kinase was phosphorylated on tyrosine in response to EGF by what the authors described as an associated tyrosine kinase. Thus, there is ample evidence that additional tyrosine kinases assist in mediating the response to growth factors such as EGF.

EGF signaling has been demonstrated to be enhanced by overexpression of Src and may cause the activation of Src (Luttrell et al., 1988). Our findings that Src creates additional SH2 docking sites on EGF-R and that one or more of these is a docking site for Src suggests an explanation of how these effects may occur. Activation of Src has been measured directly in EGF-stimulated cells, but it has also been observed that certain physiological Src substrates become phosphorylated in response to EGF stimulation. The role of Src in EGF signaling is probably not limited to the creation of additional SH2 docking sites on the receptor and is probably involved in the phosphorylation of downstream regulatory molecules. It is also possible that some of the proteins that have been thought to be substrates of EGF-R may actually be phosphorylated by Src bound to the EGF-R. Src has been demonstrated to associate with EGF-R, ErbB2, PDGF-R, colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor, c-Kit, and the fibroblast growth factor receptor (Mohammadi et al., 1991; Luttrell et al., 1994; Courtneidge et al., 1993; Zhan et al., 1994). These interactions support the hypothesis that Src is directly involved with many growth factor signaling pathways. Furthermore, mice with homozygous deletions of the src gene die within the first few weeks after birth (Soriano et al., 1991). Surprisingly, they do not have detectable abnormalities in the brain or platelets (tissues rich in Src). However, they are deficient in bone remodeling. Although Src is necessary for survival after the first few weeks of life, it is not essential for cell viability, suggesting that its function is nonessential or that redundant pathways exist that would ensure cell viability even in the absence of Src.

As just implied, EGF is not the only growth factor that seems to involve Src in its signaling. PDGF stimulation of cells results in activation and phosphorylation of Src, and the PDGF-R directly associates with Src via a PDGF-R autophosphorylated site. ErbB2 has been reported to associate with Src in mammary tumor cells (Luttrell et al., 1994). We now report that the EGF-R and ErbB2 are also phosphorylated by Src on non-autophosphorylation sites, and it is these additional sites that are required for Src binding. Therefore, Src may be an intrinsic part of many growth factor signaling pathways. This view is consistent with the ubiquitous expression of Src in all cell types.

While we present strong evidence that these mechanisms occur in at least some tumor cell lines, it is unclear whether they contribute in any way to tumorigenesis or if they are involved in EGF signal transduction in non-transformed cells. Future studies, with EGF-R mutants lacking the sites phosphorylated by Src, should help to elucidate the role of these sites in EGF signaling.

  
Table: Characteristics of PTK inhibitors used

The IC values (concentration resulting in a 50% reduction in phosphotransfer from ATP to substrate) of the compounds used in this study toward the relevant kinases are tabulated below. The IC values for EGF-R and Src were determined using exogenous substrates as previously described (Buchdunger et al., 1994). The IC values for ErbB2 were estimated from inhibition of autophosphorylation.


  
Table: EGF induced tyrosine phosphorylations found on the EGF receptor

It is possible that the nonautophosphorylated sites are phosphorylated by a kinase other than Src; however, these sites are phosphorylated by Src in vitro and in tumor cells that overexpress Src (Fig. 2). Src and P85 are tentatively indicated to bind to specific sites since they only bind to Src-phosphorylated EGF-R, and only one of these sites fits the binding specificity for each protein.



FOOTNOTES

*
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 41-61-696-3670; Fax: 41-61-696-3835.

The abbreviations used are: EGF-R, epidermal growth factor receptor; RPTK, receptor protein-tyrosine kinase; PDGF-R, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; pTyr, phosphotyrosine.


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to M. Becker for supplying EGF receptor and ErbB2 and P. Haberthuer for assistance in large scale expression of pp60.


REFERENCES
  1. Batzer, A. G., Rotin, D., Urena, J. M., Skolnik, E. Y., and Schlessinger, J. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol.14, 5192-5201 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Buchdunger, E., Trinks, U., Mett, H., Regenass, U., Muller, M., Meyer, T., McGlynn, E., Pinna, L. A., Traxler, P., and Lydon, N. B. (1994) Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A.91, 2334-2338 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Cantley, L. C., Auger, K. R., Carpenter, C., Duckworth, B., Graziani, A., Kapeller, R., and Soltoff, S. (1991) Cell64, 281-302 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Chang, J. H., Wilson, L. K., Moyers, J. S., Zhang, K., and Parson, S. J. (1993) Oncogene8, 959-967 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Coker, K. J., Staros, J. V., and Guyer, C. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. U. S. A.91, 6967-6971 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Courtneidge, S. A., Dhand, R., Pilat, D., Twamley, M., Waterfield, M. D., and Roussel, M. F. (1993) EMBO J.12, 943-950 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Downward, J., Parker, P., and Waterfield, M. D. (1984) Nature311, 283-285 [CrossRef]
  8. Feng, G. S., Shen, R., Heng, H. H., Tsui, L. C., Kazlauskas, A., and Pawson, T. (1994) Oncogene9, 1545-1550 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Gill, G. N., Chen, W. S., Lazar, C. S., Glenney, J. R., Wiley, H. S., Ingraham, H. A., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1988) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.53, 467-477
  10. Gould, K. L., and Hunter, T. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol.8, 3345-3356 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Guy, P. M., Carraway, K. L., III, and Cerione, R. A. (1992) J Biol. Chem.267, 13851-13856 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Hsuan, J. J., Totty, N., and Waterfield, M. D. (1989) Biochem. J.262, 659-663 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Hu, P., Margolis, B., Skolnik, E. Y., Lammers, R., Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol.12, 981-990 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Koch, A. A., Anderson, D., Moran, M. F., Ellis, C., and Pawson, T. (1991) Science252, 668-674 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lechleider, R. J., Sugimoto, S., Bennett, A. M., Kashishian, A. S., Cooper, J. A., Shoelson, S. E., Walsh, C. T., and Neel, B. G. (1993) J. Biol. Chem268, 21478-21481 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Luttrell, D. K., Luttrell, L. M., and Parsons, S. J. (1988) Mol. Cell Biol.8, 497-501 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Luttrell, D. K., Lee, A., Lansing, T. J., Crosby, R. M., Jung, K. D., Willard, D., Luther, M., Rodriguez, M., Berman, J., and Gilmer, T. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.91, 83-87 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Lydon, N. B., Gay, B., Mett, H., Murray, B., Liebetanz, J., Gutzwiller, A., Piwnica-Worms, H., Roberts, T. M., and McGlynn, E. (1992) Biochem. J.287, 985-993
  19. Margolis, B. L., Lax, I., Kris, R., Dombalagain, M., Honegger, A. M., Howk, R., Givol, D., Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem.264, 10667-10671 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Margolis, B., Li, N., Koch, A., Mohammadi, M., Hurwitz, D. R., Zilberstein, A., Ullrich, A., Pawson, T., and Schlessinger, J. (1990) EMBO J.9, 4375-4380 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Masanori, I., Yoshida, K., Kyo, E., Ayhan, A., Nakayama, H., Yasui, W., Ito, H., and Tahara, E. (1990) Virchows Arch. B Cell Pathol.59, 173-178 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. McGlade, C. J., Ellis, C., Reedijk, M., Anderson, D., Mbamalu, G., Reith, A. D., Panayotou, G., End, P., Bernstein, A., Kazlauskas, A., Waterfield, M. D., and Pawson, T. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol.12, 991-997 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. McGlynn, E., Becker, M., Mett, H., Reutener, S., Cozens, R., and Lydon, N. B. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem.207, 265-275 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Mohammadi, M., Honegger, A. M., Rotin, D., Fischer, R., Bellot, F., Li, W., Dionne, C. A., Jaye, M., Rubinstein, M., and Schlessinger, J. (1991) Mol. Cell Biol.11, 5068-5078 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Moran, M. F., Polakis, P., McCormick, F., Pawson, T., and Ellis, C. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol.11, 1804-1812 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Pronk, G. J., McGlade, J., Pelicci, G., Pawson, T., and Bos, J. L. (1993) J. Biol. Chem.268, 5748-5753 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Rotin, D., Margolis, B., Mohammadi, M., Daly, R. J., Daum, G., Li, N., Fischer, E. H., Burgess, W. H., Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1992) EMBO J.11, 559-567 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Soler, C., Beguinot, L., and Carpenter, G. (1994) J. Biol. Chem.269, 12320-12324 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., Chaudhuri, M., Gish, G., Pawson, T., Haser, W. G., King, F., Roberts, T., Ratnofsky, S., Lechleider, R. J., Neel, B. G., Birge, R. B., Fajardo, J. E., Chou, M. M., Hanafusa, H., Schaffhausen, B., and Cantley, L. C. (1993) Cell72, 767-778 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., McGlade, J., Olivier, P., Pawson, T., Bustelo, X. R., Barbacid, M., Sabe, H., Hanafusa, H., Yi, T., Ren, R., Baltimore, D., Ratnofsky, S., Feldman, R. A., and Cantley, L. C. (1994) Mol Cell. Biol.14, 2777-2785 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Soriano, P., Montgomery, C., Geske, R., and Bradley, A. (1991) Cell64, 693-702 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Stover, D. R., Liebetanz, J., and Lydon, N. B. (1994) J. Biol. Chem.269, 26885-26889 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Sugimoto, S., Wandless, T. J., Shoelson, S. E., Neel, B. G., and Walsh, C. T. (1994) J. Biol. Chem.269, 13614-13622 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Traxler, P. M., Wacker, O., Bach, H. L., Geissler, J. F., Kump, W., Meyer, T., Regenass, U., Roesel, J. L., and Lydon, N. (1991) J. Med. Chem.34, 2328-2337 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Traxler, P. M., Trinks, U., Buchdunger, E., Mett, H., Meyer, T., Muller, M., Regenass, U., Roesel, J., and Lydon, N. (1995) J. Med. Chem., in press
  36. Uchida, T., Matozaki, T., Noguchi, T., Yamao, T., Horita, K., Suzuki, T., Fujioka, Y., Sakamoto, C., and Kasuga, M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem.269, 12220-12228 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Ullrich, A., and Schlessinger, J. (1990) Cell61, 203-212 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Vega, Q. C., Cochet, C., Filhol, O., Chang, C., Rhee, S. G., and Gill, G. N. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol.12, 128-135 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Walton, G. M., Chen, W. S., Rosenfeld, M. G., and Gill, G. N. (1990) J Biol. Chem.265, 1750-1754 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Wasilenko, W. J., Payne, D. M., Fitzgerald, D. L., and Weber, M. J. (1991) Mol. Cell. Biol.11, 309-321 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Xiao, S., Roses, D. W., Sasaoka, T., Maegawa, H., Burke, T. R., Jr., Roller, P. P., Shoelson, S. E., and Olefsky, J. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem.269, 21244-21248 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Zhan, X., Plourde, C., Hu, X., Friesel, R., and Maciag, T. (1994) J. Biol Chem.269, 20221-20224 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.




Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
G. Giaccone and P. A. Zucali
Src as a potential therapeutic target in non-small-cell lung cancer
Ann. Onc., July 1, 2008; 19(7): 1219 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Nozawa, G. Howell, S. Suzuki, Q. Zhang, Y. Qi, J. Klein-Seetharaman, A. Wells, J. R. Grandis, and S. M. Thomas
Combined Inhibition of PLC{gamma}-1 and c-Src Abrogates Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mediated Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Invasion
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 14(13): 4336 - 4344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. L. Mueller, L. A. Hunter, S. P. Ethier, and J. L. Boerner
Met and c-Src Cooperate to Compensate for Loss of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Kinase Activity in Breast Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 68(9): 3314 - 3322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
S. Panigone, M. Hsieh, M. Fu, L. Persani, and M. Conti
Luteinizing Hormone Signaling in Preovulatory Follicles Involves Early Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Pathway
Mol. Endocrinol., April 1, 2008; 22(4): 924 - 936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
S. Zhuang, G. R. Kinsey, K. Rasbach, and R. G. Schnellmann
Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor and Src family kinases in proliferation of renal epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): F459 - F468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. L. Petreaca, M. Yao, Y. Liu, K. DeFea, and M. Martins-Green
Transactivation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 by Interleukin-8 (IL-8/CXCL8) Is Required for IL-8/CXCL8-induced Endothelial Permeability
Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2007; 18(12): 5014 - 5023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Cheng, S. C. Watkins, and W. H. Walker
Testosterone Activates Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase via Src Kinase and the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Sertoli Cells
Endocrinology, May 1, 2007; 148(5): 2066 - 2074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
W. Xu, X. Yuan, K. Beebe, Z. Xiang, and L. Neckers
Loss of Hsp90 Association Up-Regulates Src-Dependent ErbB2 Activity
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2007; 27(1): 220 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
J. Zhang, S. Kalyankrishna, M. Wislez, N. Thilaganathan, B. Saigal, W. Wei, L. Ma, I. I. Wistuba, F. M. Johnson, and J. M. Kurie
Src-Family Kinases Are Activated in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Promote the Survival of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Dependent Cell Lines
Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2007; 170(1): 366 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. M. Fleming, G. Desury, T. A. Polanco, and W. S. Cohick
Insulin Growth Factor-I and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors Recruit Distinct Upstream Signaling Molecules to Enhance AKT Activation in Mammary Epithelial Cells
Endocrinology, December 1, 2006; 147(12): 6027 - 6035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. M. Knowlden, I. R. Hutcheson, D. Barrow, J. M. W. Gee, and R. I. Nicholson
Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I Receptor Signaling in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer: A Supporting Role to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
Endocrinology, November 1, 2005; 146(11): 4609 - 4618.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Calautti, J. Li, S. Saoncella, J. L. Brissette, and P. F. Goetinck
Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Signaling to Akt Promotes Keratinocyte Differentiation Versus Death
J. Biol. Chem., September 23, 2005; 280(38): 32856 - 32865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
E. Boeri Erba, E. Bergatto, S. Cabodi, L. Silengo, G. Tarone, P. Defilippi, and O. N. Jensen
Systematic Analysis of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor by Mass Spectrometry Reveals Stimulation-dependent Multisite Phosphorylation
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, August 1, 2005; 4(8): 1107 - 1121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
U. G. B. Haider, T. U. Roos, M. I. Kontaridis, B. G. Neel, D. Sorescu, K. K. Griendling, A. M. Vollmar, and V. M. Dirsch
Resveratrol Inhibits Angiotensin II- and Epidermal Growth Factor-Mediated Akt Activation: Role of Gab1 and Shp2
Mol. Pharmacol., July 1, 2005; 68(1): 41 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
P. Van Slyke, M. L. Coll, Z. Master, H. Kim, J. Filmus, and D. J. Dumont
Dok-R Mediates Attenuation of Epidermal Growth Factor-Dependent Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase and Akt Activation through Processive Recruitment of c-Src and Csk
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2005; 25(9): 3831 - 3841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Li, C. Marshall, L. Mei, L. Dzubow, C. Schmults, M. Dans, and J. Seykora
Srcasm Modulates EGF and Src-kinase Signaling in Keratinocytes
J. Biol. Chem., February 18, 2005; 280(7): 6036 - 6046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Gambarotta, D. Garzotto, E. Destro, B. Mautino, C. Giampietro, S. Cutrupi, C. Dati, E. Cattaneo, A. Fasolo, and I. Perroteau
ErbB4 Expression in Neural Progenitor Cells (ST14A) Is Necessary to Mediate Neuregulin-1{beta}1-induced Migration
J. Biol. Chem., November 19, 2004; 279(47): 48808 - 48816.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Q. Zhang, S. M. Thomas, S. Xi, T. E. Smithgall, J. M. Siegfried, J. Kamens, W. E. Gooding, and J. R. Grandis
Src Family Kinases Mediate Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Ligand Cleavage, Proliferation, and Invasion of Head and Neck Cancer Cells
Cancer Res., September 1, 2004; 64(17): 6166 - 6173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
T. Tanimoto, A. O. Lungu, and B. C. Berk
Sphingosine 1-Phosphate Transactivates the Platelet-Derived Growth Factor {beta} Receptor and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
Circ. Res., April 30, 2004; 94(8): 1050 - 1058.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Matsuoka, S. Nada, and M. Okada
Mechanism of Csk-mediated Down-regulation of Src Family Tyrosine Kinases in Epidermal Growth Factor Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., February 13, 2004; 279(7): 5975 - 5983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
W. Sun, X. Wei, K. Kesavan, T. P. Garrington, R. Fan, J. Mei, S. M. Anderson, E. W. Gelfand, and G. L. Johnson
MEK Kinase 2 and the Adaptor Protein Lad Regulate Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase 5 Activation by Epidermal Growth Factor via Src
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2003; 23(7): 2298 - 2308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Cuadrado, L. F. Garcia-Fernandez, L. Gonzalez, Y. Suarez, A. Losada, V. Alcaide, T. Martinez, J. M. Fernandez-Sousa, J. M. Sanchez-Puelles, and A. Munoz
AplidinTM Induces Apoptosis in Human Cancer Cells via Glutathione Depletion and Sustained Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, Src, JNK, and p38 MAPK
J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(1): 241 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Z. Ren and T. S. Schaefer
ErbB-2 Activates Stat3alpha in a Src- and JAK2-dependent Manner
J. Biol. Chem., October 4, 2002; 277(41): 38486 - 38493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
A. Sabri, J. Short, J. Guo, and S. F. Steinberg
Protease-Activated Receptor-1-Mediated DNA Synthesis in Cardiac Fibroblast Is via Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation: Distinct PAR-1 Signaling Pathways in Cardiac Fibroblasts and Cardiomyocytes
Circ. Res., September 20, 2002; 91(6): 532 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Wu, L. M. Graves, G. N. Gill, S. J. Parsons, and J. M. Samet
Src-dependent Phosphorylation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor on Tyrosine 845 Is Required for Zinc-induced Ras Activation
J. Biol. Chem., June 28, 2002; 277(27): 24252 - 24257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. J. Hellyer, M.-S. Kim, and J. G. Koland
Heregulin-dependent Activation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase and Akt via the ErbB2/ErbB3 Co-receptor
J. Biol. Chem., November 2, 2001; 276(45): 42153 - 42161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cell Growth Differ.Home page
D. J. Dunican, E. J. Williams, F. V. Howell, and P. Doherty
Selective Inhibition of Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF)-stimulated Mitogenesis by a FGF Receptor-1-derived Phosphopeptide
Cell Growth Differ., May 1, 2001; 12(5): 255 - 264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. Venkatakrishnan, R. Salgia, and J. E. Groopman
Chemokine Receptors CXCR-1/2 Activate Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase via the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Ovarian Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., March 15, 2000; 275(10): 6868 - 6875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. M. Moasser, M. Srethapakdi, K. S. Sachar, A. J. Kraker, and N. Rosen
Inhibition of Src Kinases by a Selective Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Causes Mitotic Arrest
Cancer Res., December 1, 1999; 59(24): 6145 - 6152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Mineo, G. N. Gill, and R. G. W. Anderson
Regulated Migration of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor from Caveolae
J. Biol. Chem., October 22, 1999; 274(43): 30636 - 30643.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Tiganis, B. E. Kemp, and N. K. Tonks
The Protein-tyrosine Phosphatase TCPTP Regulates Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-mediated and Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-dependent Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 1999; 274(39): 27768 - 27775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. A. Olayioye, I. Beuvink, K. Horsch, J. M. Daly, and N. E. Hynes
ErbB Receptor-induced Activation of Stat Transcription Factors Is Mediated by Src Tyrosine Kinases
J. Biol. Chem., June 11, 1999; 274(24): 17209 - 17218.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. J. Barbier, H. M. Poppleton, Y. Yigzaw, J. B. Mullenix, G. J. Wiepz, P. J. Bertics, and T. B. Patel
Transmodulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Function by Cyclic AMP-dependent Protein Kinase
J. Biol. Chem., May 14, 1999; 274(20): 14067 - 14073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. S. Biscardi, M.-C. Maa, D. A. Tice, M. E. Cox, T.-H. Leu, and S. J. Parsons
c-Src-mediated Phosphorylation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor on Tyr845 and Tyr1101 Is Associated with Modulation of Receptor Function
J. Biol. Chem., March 19, 1999; 274(12): 8335 - 8343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. A. Tice, J. S. Biscardi, A. L. Nickles, and S. J. Parsons
Mechanism of biological synergy between cellular Src and epidermal growth factor receptor
PNAS, February 16, 1999; 96(4): 1415 - 1420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
V. P. Krymskaya, R. Hoffman, A. Eszterhas, S. Kane, V. Ciocca, and R. A. Panettieri Jr.
EGF activates ErbB-2 and stimulates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in human airway smooth muscle cells
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, February 1, 1999; 276(2): L246 - L255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. A. Olayioye, D. Graus-Porta, R. R. Beerli, J. Rohrer, B. Gay, and N. E. Hynes
ErbB-1 and ErbB-2 Acquire Distinct Signaling Properties Dependent upon Their Dimerization Partner
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 1998; 18(9): 5042 - 5051.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. Herrlich, H. Daub, A. Knebel, P. Herrlich, A. Ullrich, G. Schultz, and T. Gudermann
Ligand-independent activation of platelet-derived growth factor receptor is a necessary intermediate in lysophosphatidic, acid-stimulated mitogenic activity in L cells
PNAS, July 21, 1998; 95(15): 8985 - 8990.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Eguchi, K. Numaguchi, H. Iwasaki, T. Matsumoto, T. Yamakawa, H. Utsunomiya, E. D. Motley, H. Kawakatsu, K. M. Owada, Y. Hirata, et al.
Calcium-dependent Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Transactivation Mediates the Angiotensin II-induced Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Activation in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells
J. Biol. Chem., April 10, 1998; 273(15): 8890 - 8896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. K. Moscatello, M. Holgado-Madruga, D. R. Emlet, R. B. Montgomery, and A. J. Wong
Constitutive Activation of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase by a Naturally Occurring Mutant Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., January 2, 1998; 273(1): 200 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. F. Ware, D. A. Tice, S. J. Parsons, and D. A. Lauffenburger
Overexpression of Cellular Src in Fibroblasts Enhances Endocytic Internalization of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor
J. Biol. Chem., November 28, 1997; 272(48): 30185 - 30190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Wartmann, P. Hofer, P. Turowski, A. R. Saltiel, and N. E. Hynes
Negative Modulation of Membrane Localization of the Raf-1 Protein Kinase by Hyperphosphorylation
J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 1997; 272(7): 3915 - 3923.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. M. Luttrell, G. J. Della Rocca, T. van Biesen, D. K. Luttrell, and R. J. Lefkowitz
Gbeta gamma Subunits Mediate Src-dependent Phosphorylation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor. A SCAFFOLD FOR G PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR-MEDIATED Ras ACTIVATION
J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 1997; 272(7): 4637 - 4644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Zrihan-Licht, J. Lim, I. Keydar, M. X. Sliwkowski, J. E. Groopman, and H. Avraham
Association of Csk-homologous Kinase (CHK) (formerly MATK) with HER-2/ErbB-2 in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., January 17, 1997; 272(3): 1856 - 1863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Wartmann, N. Cella, P. Hofer, B. Groner, X. Liu, L. Hennighausen, and N. E. Hynes
Lactogenic Hormone Activation of Stat5 and Transcription of the beta -Casein Gene in Mammary Epithelial Cells Is Independent of p42 ERK2 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Activity
J. Biol. Chem., December 13, 1996; 271(50): 31863 - 31868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Joos, S. Trouliaris, G. Helftenbein, H. Niemann, and T. Tamura
Tyrosine Phosphorylation of the Juxtamembrane Domain of the v-Fms Oncogene Product Is Required for Its Association with a 55-kDa Protein
J. Biol. Chem., October 4, 1996; 271(40): 24476 - 24481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. M. Luttrell, B. E. Hawes, T. van Biesen, D. K. Luttrell, T. J. Lansing, and R. J. Lefkowitz
Role of c-Src Tyrosine Kinase in G Protein-coupled Receptorand Gbeta gamma Subunit-mediated Activation of Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases
J. Biol. Chem., August 9, 1996; 271(32): 19443 - 19450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. A. Broome and T. Hunter
Requirement for c-Src Catalytic Activity and the SH3 Domain in Platelet-derived Growth Factor BB and Epidermal Growth Factor Mitogenic Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., July 12, 1996; 271(28): 16798 - 16806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. R. Stover, P. Furet, and N. B. Lydon
Modulation of the SH2 Binding Specificity and Kinase Activity of Src by Tyrosine Phosphorylation within Its SH2 Domain
J. Biol. Chem., May 24, 1996; 271(21): 12481 - 12487.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. F. Denning, A. A. Dlugosz, D. W. Threadgill, T. Magnuson, and S. H. Yuspa
Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signal Transduction Pathway Stimulates Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Protein Kinase C [IMAGE]
J. Biol. Chem., March 8, 1996; 271(10): 5325 - 5331.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Jost, T. M. Huggett, C. Kari, L. H. Boise, and U. Rodeck
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-dependent Control of Keratinocyte Survival and Bcl-xL Expression through a MEK-dependent Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., February 23, 2001; 276(9): 6320 - 6326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stover, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lydon, N. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stover, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Lydon, N. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement