|
[]article
Volume 270,
Number 37,
Issue of September 15, pp. 21645-21651, 1995
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Iron Regulates
the Intracellular Degradation of Iron Regulatory Protein 2 by the
Proteasome (*)
(Received for publication, April 17, 1995; and in revised form, June 28, 1995)
Bing
Guo
,
John D.
Phillips
,
Yang
Yu
,
Elizabeth A.
Leibold (§)
From the Eccles Program in Human Molecular Biology and
Genetics and the Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake
City, Utah 84112
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Iron regulatory proteins (IRP1 and IRP2) are RNA-binding
proteins that bind to specific structures, termed iron-responsive
elements (IREs), that are located in the 5`- or 3`-untranslated regions
of mRNAs that encode proteins involved in iron homeostasis. IRP1 and
IRP2 RNA binding activities are regulated by iron; IRP1 and IRP2 bind
IREs with high affinity in iron-depleted cells and with low affinity in
iron-repleted cells. The decrease in IRP1 RNA binding activity occurs
by a switch between apoprotein and 4Fe-4S forms, without changes in
IRP1 levels, whereas the decrease in IRP2 RNA binding activity reflects
a reduction in IRP2 levels. To determine the mechanism by which iron
decreases IRP2 levels, we studied IRP2 regulation by iron in rat
hepatoma and human HeLa cells. The iron-dependent decrease in IRP2
levels was not due to a decrease in the amount of IRP2 mRNA or to a
decrease in the rate of IRP2 synthesis. Pulse-chase experiments
demonstrated that iron resulted in a 3-fold increase in the degradation
rate of IRP2. IRP2 degradation depends on protein synthesis, but not
transcription, suggesting a requirement for a labile protein. IRP2
degradation is not prevented by lysosomal inhibitors or calpain II
inhibitors, but is prevented by inhibitors that block proteasome
function. These data suggest the involvement of the proteasome in
iron-mediated IRP2 proteolysis.
INTRODUCTION
Iron regulatory proteins (IRPs) ( )are cytosolic
RNA-binding proteins that regulate the post-transcriptional expression
of genes that are involved in iron
homeostasis(1, 2, 3, 4) . IRPs were
formerly known as the iron-responsive element-binding protein (IRE-BP),
the ferritin repressor protein (FRP), and the iron regulatory factor
(IRF). IRPs bind with high affinity to RNA stem-loops known as
iron-responsive elements (IREs). IREs are located in the 5`-
untranslated regions of ferritin and erythroid -aminolevulinic
acid synthase mRNAs where binding causes translational repression (5, 6, 7) . Five IREs are located in the
3`-untranslated region of transferrin receptor
mRNA(8, 9) , and binding of the IRP stabilizes
transferrin receptor mRNA(9, 10) . Two distinct
IRPs have been cloned and characterized in mammalian cells and have
been designated as IRP1 and IRP2. IRP1 has been cloned from a variety
of mammalian species(5, 11, 12) . IRP1 has a
molecular mass of 98,000 Da and shares 30% amino acid identity with the
4Fe-4S enzyme, mitochondrial aconitase(13) . The 18 active site
residues in mitochondrial aconitase, including the 3 cysteines that
serve as ligands for the 4Fe-4S cluster are conserved in
IRP1(13) . In addition, IRP1 is an active cytosolic
aconitase(14, 15) . In iron-repleted cells, IRP1
exhibits aconitase activity and contains iron, but binds the IRE with
low affinity. In contrast, in iron-depleted cells, IRP1 lacks aconitase
activity and iron, but binds the IRE with high affinity. UV
cross-linking studies have shown overlap between RNA binding and the
aconitase active sites, indicating that RNA binding and aconitase
activities are mutually exclusive(16, 17) . Recent
data indicated that aconitase activity is not necessary for iron
regulation of IRP1, since substitution of an alanine for an active site
serine does not prevent assembly and disassembly of the 4Fe-4S
cluster(18) . IRP2 has been characterized in rat tissues by
RNA band shift assays (19, 20, 21, 22) and has been
purified from rat liver and rat hepatoma cells (20) . The
partial amino acid sequence of rat IRP2 is similar to the predicted
protein sequence encoded by a cDNA isolated from a human T cell
library(11, 23) , suggesting that this is the rat
version of the human protein. A second IRP has been characterized from
mouse tissues by RNA band shift analysis(24) , which is
presumed to be homologous to the rat and the human IRP2. IRP2
contains similar biochemical properties to IRP1 in that it binds IREs
with similar affinity (20, 24) and represses
translation of IRE-containing mRNAs in
vitro(20, 25) . IRP1 and IRP2 differ in two
aspects: first, unlike IRP1, IRP2 does not exhibit aconitase activity,
indicating that aconitase activity is not necessary for regulation by
iron(20) , and second, that although iron results in a decrease
in IRP1 and IRP2 RNA-binding activities, the amount of IRP1 remains
constant(12, 26) , whereas the amount of IRP2 protein
is substantially reduced (20, 27 These novel
properties of IRP2 raised questions as to how intracellular iron
regulates IRP2 RNA binding activity. To answer this question, we
analyzed the regulation of IRP2 by iron in rat hepatoma cells and human
HeLa cells. We found that the marked reduction in IRP2 RNA binding
activity and protein levels in iron-treated cells is due to increased
turnover of IRP2. IRP2 synthesis and IRP2 mRNAs levels are unaffected
by iron treatment. The iron-mediated degradation of IRP2 requires
protein synthesis, but not transcription, suggesting that the synthesis
of a labile protein is required. We also demonstrate that the
proteasome complex is required for iron-mediated degradation of IRP2.
Regulation of IRP2 protein levels by iron occurs in a variety of cell
types, indicating that iron-mediated degradation is a common pathway
for regulating IRP2 RNA binding activity.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
MaterialsThe proteasome inhibitor MG-132
(carbobenzoxyl-leucinyl-leucinyl-leucinal-H) was a gift from Myogenics,
Inc., Cambridge, MA. Calpain inhibitor II and actinomycin D was
purchased from Sigma. Antibodies generated against rat IRP1 and IRP2
were prepared as described(20) .
Cell CultureThe rat hepatoma cell line FTO2B and
human HeLa cells were grown at 37 °C in an 8% CO atmosphere in Dulbecco's modified Eagles's medium
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. For iron and
iron chelation studies, cells were treated with either 50 µg/ml
ferric ammonium citrate (FAC) or 200 µM desferrioxamine,
respectively. For protease inhibition studies, cells were pretreated
for 1 h with either 0.1 mM MG-132 or 0.1 mM calpain
II inhibitor. To inhibit lysosomes, cells were pretreated for 1 h with
either 20 mM ammonium chloride or 0.15 mM chloroquine
prior to the addition of FAC.
Measurement of IRP2 Degradation RatesCells were
preincubated in methionine-free media in the presence of 100 µCi/ml
Tran S-label (ICN Biomedicals) for 4 h, after which fresh
media containing an excess of unlabeled methionine with or without 50
µg/ml FAC was added. At the indicated times, cells were lysed in
Buffer A (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 2 mM dithiothreitol,
5% glycerol, 40 mM KCl) containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), and an aliquot of each sample was
used to determine protein concentration using the bicinchoninic acid
protein assay (Pierce). Immunoprecipitation of IRP2 was carried out by
incubating 30 µg of labeled extracts with 5 µl of rabbit
anti-rat IRP2 antisera for 3 h, followed by the addition of 20 µl
of protein A-agarose suspension for 2 h. The immunocomplexes were
washed with RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl , 0.5%
deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 1% Nonidet P-40, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
8.0), boiled in SDS sample buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2%
SDS, 1% -mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol), and analyzed by 8%
SDS-PAGE. The labeled protein was transferred to polyvinylidene
difluoride (Millipore) membrane and subjected to autoradiography. The t of IRP2 was determined by densitometric analysis of the
labeled IRP2 bands.
Measurement of IRP2 Synthesis RatesFTO2B cells
were preincubated for 2.5 h in medium in the presence or the absence of
50 µg/ml FAC. The medium was replaced with methionine-free medium
for 15 min in the absence or presence of FAC. Tran S-label
(100 µCi/ml) was added to the cells and then cells were harvested
at 10, 20, 40, or 60 min after labeling. IRP2 was immunoprecipitated
from each extract (100 µg) and analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE as described
above.
RNA Band Shift Assays and Immunoblot AnalysisCell
lysates for RNA band shift assays and immunoblots were prepared by
lysing cells in Buffer A containing 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The lysates were spun in at 13,000
g for 10 min, and protein concentration was
quantitated using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce). For
RNA band shift assays using anti-IRP2 antisera to
``supershift'' the IRP2 IRE complex from the lysates, 5
µl of anti-IRP2 antisera generated against the 73-amino acid
insertion in IRP2 (20) or 5 µl of rabbit preimmune antisera
was preincubated with extracts for 5 min before the addition of the P-labeled RNA. RNA band shift assays were carried out as
described previously(19) .For immunoblot analysis, 50
µg of protein from cell lysates was fractionated on 8% SDS-PAGE.
The protein was transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, and the
membranes were incubated with a chicken anti-IRP1 antibody generated
against the entire IRP1 protein (20) or a rabbit anti-IRP2
antibody(20) . After 1 h, the membranes were washed and
incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-chicken or
goat anti-rabbit IgG for 1 h. The protein was visualized using the
enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection system (Amersham
Corp.) according to the manufacturer.
Northern BlottingTotal RNA was isolated from
FTO2B cells treated with FAC or desferrioxamine using TRIzol (Life
Technologies, Inc.). The RNA was fractionated on a 1%
formaldehyde-agarose gel and was transferred to nylon membranes. The
membranes were hybridized with a random-primed (28) P-labeled IRP2 cDNA using Rapid Hyb
(Amersham) according to the manufacturer and washed in 1 SSC
(20 SSC = 0.3 M sodium citrate, 3 M NaCl ) containing 0.1% SDS for 30 min at 65 °C. The
membrane was stripped and reprobed with random-primed P-labeled glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA to
control for gel loading. The filters were subjected to autoradiography
and the intensity of the bands quantified by densitometry.
RESULTS
Iron Reduces IRP2 Levels in Rat Hepatoma and in Human
HeLa CellsWe have previously demonstrated that treatment of
FTO2B cells with FAC results in a 5-fold decrease in IRP1 RNA binding
activity and undetectable IRP2 RNA binding activity after 4
h(20) . The decrease in IRP2 RNA binding activity correlated
with a decrease in IRP2 concentration; however, the IRP1 levels were
not measured in those experiments. Therefore, FTO2B cells were treated
with FAC for 1-24 h, and IRP1 and IRP2 RNA binding activity and
their protein levels were measured by RNA band shift gels and
immunoblot analysis using anti-IRP1 or anti-IRP2 antisera, respectively (Fig. 1, A and B). Anti-IRP2 antibody was
generated against the IRP2 73 amino acid insertion not present in IRP1
and is therefore specific for IRP2. Fig. 1A shows that
IRP1 and IRP2 RNA binding activities begins to decrease at 2.5 h after
iron treatment and remain low during the 24-h time course. During this
time, the amount of IRP1 remained constant (Fig. 1B, lanes
1-8), whereas the amount of IRP2 is reduced about 5-fold and
reflected the decreases in RNA binding activity (Fig. 1B,
lanes 9-16).
Figure 1:
Effect of iron treatment on RNA binding
activity and levels of IRP1 and IRP2 in rat hepatoma cells. A,
FTO2B cells were grown in the presence (lanes 2-7) or
the absence (lanes 1 and 8) of 50 µg/ml FAC for
1-24 h after which lysates were prepared as described under
``Experimental Procedures.'' C24, untreated cells
harvested at 24 h. Equal amounts of protein (10 µg) were incubated
with a P-labeled IRE RNA followed by electrophoresis of
the RNA-protein complexes by a 5% native polyacrylamide gel. The
positions of IRP1 IRE and IRP2 IRE complexes and free IRE RNA
are indicated. B, equal amounts of protein (50 µg) from A were subjected to 8% SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblot
analysis using anti-rat IRP1 or anti-IRP2 antisera. Molecular weight
standards are indicated.
To determine if the iron-mediated decrease
in IRP2 levels occurs in other cell types, we measured RNA binding
activity and protein levels for IRP1 and IRP2 in human HeLa cells
treated with FAC for 1-24 h (Fig. 2). Since human
IRP1 IRE and IRP2 IRE complexes comigrate on native
polyacrylamide gels, we carried out supershift assays using anti-IRP2
antisera in RNA band shift assays. We have previously demonstrated that
anti-IRP2 antisera does not interfere with RNA binding and results in a
supershifted IRP2 IRE complex(20) . Treatment of cells
with FAC caused RNA-binding activity of IRP1 and IRP2 to decrease 2-
and 5-fold, respectively (Fig. 2, A and C).
Immunoblot analysis indicated that the amount of IRP1 remained constant
during iron treatment, whereas the amount of IRP2 decreased 5-fold (Fig. 2, B and C). We have observed reductions
in the amount of IRP2 in mouse 3T3 fibroblasts and transformed human
primary embryonal 293 kidney cells treated with FAC for the same time
course (data not shown). These data indicated that the decrease in IRP1
and IRP2 RNA binding activities induced by iron are mediated by
different cellular processes and occurs in a variety of cell types.
Figure 2:
Effect of iron treatment on RNA binding
activity and protein levels of IRP1 and IRP2 in human HeLa cells. A, HeLa cells were grown in the presence (lanes
2-7) or absence (lane 1) of 50 µg/ml FAC. Equal
amounts of protein (10 µg) were incubated with (lanes
9-15) or without (lanes 1-8) anti-IRP2
antisera for 5 min followed by the addition of P-labeled
IRE RNA. As a control, rabbit preimmune antisera was added to an
extract from untreated cells (C/PI, lane 8). IRP2 IRE
complexes are indicated by an asterisk. B, equal
amounts of protein (50 µg) from extracts in A were
subjected to immunoblot analysis using anti-IRP1 or anti-IRP2 antisera. C, the data in A and B were quantified by
densitometry and plotted using untreated control as
100%.
Iron Does Not Affect Amounts of the IRP2 6.4-kb
mRNAThe decrease in IRP2 protein levels induced by iron could
reflect reduced mRNA levels due to changes in transcription or mRNA
stability, or a decrease in the rate of translation of its mRNA, or an
increased rate of IRP2 degradation. To determine if iron affects IRP2
mRNA levels, we quantified IRP2 mRNA in FTO2B cells treated with FAC
for 0-24 h and desferrioxamine, an intracellular iron chelator
for 16 h (Fig. 3A). Our previous studies have indicated
that desferrioxamine increases IRP2 levels about 2-fold in FTO2B
cells(20) . As a control for gel loading, the amounts of IRP2
mRNA were normalized to glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase mRNA (Fig. 3B). Northern blotting using a labeled rat IRP2
cDNA showed that the IRP2 cDNA hybridizes to two major transcripts of
6.4 and 3.7 kb and a minor transcript of 4.2 kb after high stringency
washes. All three transcripts are capable of encoding the 104,000-Da
IRP2. Treatment of cells with FAC had no significant effect on the
amounts of the 6.4- and 4.2-kb transcripts (Fig. 3A).
The amount of the 3.7-kb transcript increases 2-fold in
desferrioxamine-treated cells. Our previous studies have suggested that
changes in the 3.7-kb levels may be due to increased utilization of an
alternative polyadenylation site in iron-deprived cells; however, the
significance of this result is unclear(29) . These data
indicate that the 5-fold reduction in IRP2 protein levels and RNA
binding activity induced by iron is not due to alterations in the
steady-state levels of the IRP2 mRNAs.
Figure 3:
Effect
of iron treatment on IRP2 mRNA levels in rat hepatoma cells. FTO2B
cells were grown in the presence of 50 µg/ml FAC (Iron)
for 1-24 h or 200 µM desferrioxamine (Df)
for 16 h. Total RNA was isolated and analyzed on an 1%
formaldehyde-agarose gel. C0 and C24, untreated cells
harvested at 0 and 24 h, respectively. The RNA was transferred to a
membrane and sequentially hybridized with a P-labeled IRP2
cDNA (A) or a P-labeled glyceraldehyde phosphate
dehydrogenase cDNA (B) to control for gel loading. The size of
the IRP2 transcripts are indicated by arrows. RNA molecular
weight standards are from Life Technologies,
Inc.
Iron Increases the Rate of IRP2 Degradation, but Has No
Effect on the Rate of IRP2 SynthesisThe reduction in IRP2
levels by iron could be due to either an increase in IRP2 turnover, a
decrease in IRP2 synthesis, or a combination of both. To test whether
iron increases the degradation rate of IRP2, pulse-chase experiments
were carried out in the presence or absence of FAC, labeled IRP2 was
immunoprecipitated with anti-IRP2 followed by fractionation of the
immunocomplexes by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 4A). IRP2 was
identified by comparison with immunoprecipitated protein from a control
extract with preimmune rabbit antisera (Fig. 4A, lanes 1 and 2). FAC treatment increased the rate of degradation
of IRP2 approximately 3-fold (Fig. 4A, lanes
12-18). The half-life of IRP2 in the presence and in the
absence of FAC was reduced from 4.5 h in control cells to 1.5 h in
iron-treated cells (Fig. 4B).
Figure 4:
Effect
of iron on the rate of IRP2 degradation. A, FTO2B cells were
pulse-labeled for 4 h with Tran S-label and chased in
medium containing an excess of unlabeled methionine in the absence (lanes 1-11) or the presence (lanes
12-18) of 50 µg/ml FAC for 0-8 h. IRP2 was
immunoprecipitated using anti-IRP2 antisera (lanes
3-18). As a control, IRP2 was immunoprecipitated from
extracts from untreated cells using preimmune rabbit serum (PI) (lanes 1 and 2). Labeled
immunoprecipitated protein was analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE. The positions
of the molecular weight standards and IRP2 are indicated. B,
the turnover data in A was quantified by densitometry, and the
intensity of the IRP2 bands were plotted relative to the percent of
radioactivity remaining after 0 h (lanes 3 and 4).
These experiment were carried out three times, and one representative
experiment is shown. Symbols: , no addition; ,
iron.
It was possible that
in addition to decreasing the half-life of IRP2, iron could also reduce
its rate of synthesis. Measurements of synthesis rates in the presence
of iron could be misleading, since it would not only measure synthesis,
but would also measure degradation of newly synthesized protein. To
determine if synthesis of IRP2 was affected by iron, we treated cells
with FAC for 2.5 h, then quantified the amount of
methionine incorporated into IRP2 during a
short 1-h time course. Our turnover data indicated that in 1 h after
iron treatment approximately 30% of labeled pre-existing IRP2 is
degraded. Labeled IRP2 was immunoprecipitated using anti-IRP2
antibodies at 10, 20, 40, and 60 min followed by fractionation of the
immunocomplexes by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 5A) and
quantification of the radioactivity in the IRP2 bands by densitometry (Fig. 5B). At time points between 10 and 40 min, the
rate of IRP2 synthesis was not significantly different in iron-treated
or control cells. After 1 h of labeling, the amount of labeled IRP2 in
iron-treated cells decreased slightly compared with the amount of IRP2
in control cells. The decrease in IRP2 label at 1 h is presumably due
to the increase in the degradation of newly synthesized protein. We
conclude that the iron-mediated reduction in IRP2 levels is due to an
increased rate of degradation without changes in the rate of IRP2
synthesis.
Figure 5:
Effect
of iron on the rate of IRP2 synthesis. A, FTO2B cells were
grown in the presence (lanes 5-8) or the absence (lanes 1-4) of 50 µg/ml FAC for 2.5 h. The cells
were incubated in methionine-free medium for 15 min with or without
FAC. After 15 min, the cells were labeled with 100 µCi/ml
Tran S-label and were then harvested after 10, 20, 40, and
60 min. IRP2 was immunoprecipitated using anti-IRP2 antisera and
analyzed by 8% SDS-PAGE. Molecular weight standards and IRP2 are
indicated. PI, control 60-min lysate immunoprecipitated with
preimmune serum. B, the synthesis data in A was
quantified by densitometry and the integrated density of labeled IRP2
bands was plotted. These data represent the results from two
experiments.
Protein Synthesis, but Not Transcription Is Required for
the Increased Rate of Degradation of IRP2 by IronTo determine
if protein synthesis is required for the increased degradation rate of
IRP2 induced by iron, FTO2B cells were treated with the protein
synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, in the presence or absence of FAC
for 0-4 h, and IRP1 and IRP2 RNA binding activity and IRP2
protein levels were measured (Fig. 6, A and B). FAC caused a decrease in IRP1 and IRP2 RNA binding
activity (Fig. 6B) and IRP2 protein levels (Fig. 6A). Cycloheximide alone had no effect on IRP1 or
IRP2 RNA binding activity or IRP2 protein levels. When cells were
treated with cycloheximide and FAC, IRP1 RNA binding activity decreased
similar to cells treated with FAC alone. In contrast, the reduction in
IRP2 RNA binding activity and IRP2 protein levels observed with iron
treatment did not occur when protein synthesis was inhibited (Fig. 6, A and B). The expected decrease in
IRP1 RNA-binding activity in cells treated with cycloheximide and iron
showed that cycloheximide did not interfere with iron uptake into
cells. Identical results were obtained in FTO2B cells treated with the
protein synthesis initiation inhibitor, emetine (data not shown).
Figure 6:
Effect of cycloheximide on the
iron-mediated degradation of IRP2 by iron. FTO2B cells were grown in
the presence (lanes 3-5) or absence (lanes 1 and 2) of 50 µg/ml FAC (Iron), 20 µg/ml
cycloheximide (Cyx) (lanes 6-8), or FAC plus
cycloheximide (Iron + Cyx) (lanes 9-11)
for 0-4 h. A, equal amounts of protein (50 µg) were
subjected to 8% SDS-PAGE for immunoblot analysis using anti-IRP2
antisera. Molecular weight standards and the positions of IRP2 and a
nonspecific immunoreactive band (ns) are indicated. B, equal amount of protein (10 µg) from extracts in A was incubated with P-labeled IRE followed by
electrophoresis of the RNA-protein by 5% native polyacrylamide gels.
The positions of IRP1 IRE and IRP2 IRE complexes are
indicated.
We
also determined if transcription is required for the degradation of
IRP2 induced by iron. FTO2B cells were treated with the transcription
inhibitor, actinomycin D alone, or in the presence or absence of FAC
for 0, 1, 2.5, and 4 h, and IRP1 and IRP2 RNA binding activities and
IRP2 levels were measured (Fig. 7, A and B).
Actinomycin D alone had no effect on IRP1 or IRP2 RNA binding
activities (Fig. 7B) or IRP2 protein levels (Fig. 7A). When cells were treated with FAC and
actinomycin D, IRP1 and IRP2 RNA binding activities and IRP2 levels
decreased, but not to the levels observed with iron alone. These data
indicated that the iron-mediated degradation of IRP2 requires protein
synthesis, but to a lesser extent transcription, suggesting that the
synthesis of a labile protein is required for IRP2 degradation.
Figure 7:
Effect of actinomycin D on the
iron-mediated degradation of IRP2. FTO2B cells were grown in the
presence (lanes 5-7) or absence (lanes
1-4) of 50 µg/ml FAC (Iron), 10 µM
actinomycin D (lanes 8-10), or FAC plus actinomycin D (Act D + Iron) (lanes 11-13) for 0-4
h. Immunoblot analysis (A) and RNA band shift assays (B) were carried out as described in the legend to Fig. 6.
A Proteasome Inhibitor Blocks the Iron-mediated
Degradation of IRP2 in FTO2B CellsTo identify the proteolytic
system responsible for the iron-mediated degradation of IRP2, we tested
whether proteosomal, lysosomal, and cysteine protease inhibitors
prevented IRP2 iron-mediated degradation. The multicatalytic 26 S
proteasome complex catalyzes the degradation of proteins via either
ubiquitin-dependent or ubiquitin-independent
pathways(30, 31) . First, to determine whether IRP2 is
degraded via proteasomes, we tested the effect of the potent proteasome
inhibitor MG-132 on IRP2 degradation. MG-132 is a peptide-aldehyde that
inhibits the chymotrypic activities of the proteasome (32, 33) and can inhibit intracellular proteolysis for
many hours without cellular toxicity(33) . FTO2B cells were
pretreated with MG-132 1 h prior to the addition of FAC for 1-4
h, and cytoplasmic lysates were analyzed for IRP1 and IRP2 RNA binding
activity and IRP2 protein levels. Fig. 8shows that in cells
treated with MG-132 in the presence of FAC, the decrease in IRP2 RNA
binding activity (bottom panel, lanes 9-11) and IRP2
protein levels (top panel, lanes 9-11) observed with
iron alone (lanes 6-8) is blocked. Densitometric
analysis indicated that MG-132 inhibited the iron-mediated degradation
of IRP2 and the decrease in IRP2 RNA binding activity by 90% at 4 h
after treatment. Treatment of cells with MG-132 alone had no effect on
IRP2 RNA binding activity (bottom panel, lanes 2-5) or
IRP2 protein levels (top panel, lanes 2-5).
Surprisingly, IRP1 RNA binding activity decreased in MG-132-treated
cells (lanes 2-5) similar to that observed in
iron-treated cells (lanes 6-8). Immunoblot analysis
showed that IRP1 protein levels did not change during MG-132 treatment
(data not shown), indicating that decreased RNA binding activity was
not due to decreased IRP1 protein levels. Although the mechanism
causing IRP1 RNA binding activity to decrease in MG-132-treated cells
is uncertain, we believe that it may be due to changes in intracellular
iron levels mediated by inhibition of protein degradation by MG-132.
Figure 8:
Effect of a proteasome inhibitor on IRP2
iron-mediated degradation. A, FTO2B cells were pretreated with
100 µM MG-132 in 1.0% dimethyl sulfoxide
(Me SO) for 1 h prior to the addition of 50 µg/ml FAC
for 1-4 h (lanes 9-11). Cells were also treated
with MG-132 for 1-5 h (lanes 2-5) or FAC in
Me SO for 1-4 h (lanes 6-8). CO control, untreated cells harvested at 0 h. The top panel is an immunoblot using anti-IRP2 antisera, and the bottom
panel is an RNA band shift assay. The positions of IRP1 and IRP2
are indicated.
Because MG-132 also inhibits calpains and lysosomal cysteine
proteases, such as cathepsin B, ( )we tested whether calpain
II (N-acetyl-leucinyl-leucinyl-methional-H), a cysteine
protease inhibitor, and the lysosomal inhibitors, ammonium chloride and
chloroquine, prevented iron-mediated IRP2 degradation. Previous studies
demonstrated that calpain II inhibitors have little effect on
proteasome function(33) . Fig. 9A shows that
the treatment of cells with calpain II inhibitor in the presence of FAC
has no effect on IRP2 iron-mediated degradation. Ammonium chloride also
did not inhibit IRP2 degradation by iron (Fig. 9B). We
conclude from these studies that the proteasomes, and not the
lysosomes, are required for iron-mediated degradation of IRP2.
Figure 9:
Effect of calpain II and lysosomal
inhibitors on IRP2 iron-mediated degradation. A, cells were
pretreated with 100 µM calpain II inhibitor in 0.4%
dimethylformamide for 1 h prior to the addition of 50 µg/ml FAC (lanes 6-8) or in FAC in DMF (lanes 2-4)
for 1-4 h. CO control, untreated cells harvested at 0 h. B, cells were pretreated with 20 mM ammonium chloride (lanes 5-7) or 0.15 mM chloroquine (lanes
8-10) for 1 h prior to the addition of 50 µg/ml FAC for
1-4 h. Cells were also treated with FAC (lanes
2-4) for 1-4 h. The top panels of A and B are immunoblots using anti-IRP2 antisera, and the bottom panels are RNA band shift assays. The positions of IRP1
and IRP2 are indicated.
DISCUSSION
In this paper we report the differential regulation of IRP1
and IRP2 by iron in mammalian cells. IRP1 exhibits two functions in
cells dependent on iron levels: IRP1 with an 4Fe-4S cluster functions
as an cytosolic aconitase converting citrate into isocitrate when iron
is abundant and as an RNA binding apoprotein regulating the translation
and stabilization of IRE-containing mRNAs when iron is
scarce(18, 34, 35, 36) . The switch
between the 4Fe-4S form and the apoprotein forms occurs without changes
in IRP1 levels(12, 26) . By contrast, IRP2 lacks
aconitase activity and functions solely as an RNA binding
protein(20) . Our results indicate that IRP2 is regulated by
specific proteolysis induced by iron in a variety of cells types and
that the proteasome is responsible for IRP2 degradation. Our data
suggest a mechanism for the iron-mediated degradation of IRP2. When
intracellular iron is scarce, IRP2 binds IREs with high affinity. An
increase in intracellular iron results in the induction of a labile
protein that is required for IRP2 degradation. Although we do not know
the identity and function of this protein, it is possible that it is a
targeting protein that binds IRP2 via the 73-amino acid domain, marking
it for degradation. Iron could also cause the assembly of an 4Fe-4S
cluster in IRP2, similar to the cluster in IRP1. Rat IRP2 contains the
3 conserved cysteines that coordinate the 4Fe-4S cluster in
IRP1(27, 29) . In addition, the presence of 4
cysteines and 1 histidine in the 73-amino acid insertion of IRP2
suggests that this region might also participate in iron
binding(29) . Preliminary data suggests that in vitro reconstitution of IRP2 with iron results in loss in RNA binding
activity. ( )Thus, according to our model, cluster assembly
woud lead to a conformational change in IRP2 and subsequent loss in RNA
binding activity. IRP2 would then be recognized by the targeting
protein and rapidly degraded by the proteasome. Finally, our data
indicate that the decrease IRP2 RNA binding activity mediated by iron
is also prevented when IRP2 proteolysis is blocked either by MG-132 or
by cycloheximide. One possibility to explain these data is that the
putative Fe-S cluster is unstable in IRP2 and is disassembled during
extract purification, leading to the generation of an apoprotein
containing RNA binding activity. The 26 S proteasome contains
subunits which are important in the degradation of ubiquitin-conjugated
proteins(30, 31) . We have not detected higher
molecular weight IRP2 complexes by gel electrophoresis, which might be
suggestive of ubiquitination of IRP2. However, since
ubiquitin-conjugated proteins are very labile, they are generally
difficult to detect. The 26 S proteasome also degrades
non-ubiquitinated proteins(31, 37) . The signals
required for targeting non-ubiquitinated proteins to the proteasome are
poorly understood; however, it is possible that the putative targeting
protein discussed above could mark IRP2 for degradation by the
proteasome. Although we cannot eliminate the possibility that MG-132
may affect other unknown proteases and enzymatic activities in cells,
the utilization of these inhibitors both in vitro and in
vivo have demonstrated the specificity and effectiveness of these
compounds against the proteasome(33) . Our data suggested that
MG-132 may increase cellular iron levels, perhaps by blocking the
degradation of iron transporter proteins. Peptide-aldehyde inhibitors
have been used to demonstrate the role of the proteasome in the
generation of peptides presented on the major histocompatibility class
I molecules (33) and in the proteolytic processing of the
transcription factor NF- B1(32) . The structural
determinants required for IRP2 iron-mediated degradation are unknown.
IRP2 does not contain PEST regions (sequences rich in proline,
glutamine, serine, and threonine) which are commonly found in proteins
that are rapidly degraded(38) . However, IRP2, the 73-amino
acid insertion, contains a site that is susceptible to proteolysis
during purification and results in the production of an 83,000-Da
proteolytic polypeptide(20) . The cleavage site has the
sequence SQ- IENTP and is not a known protease cleavage sequence.
Whether proteolysis at this site represents a physiological mechanism
for iron-mediated degradation or whether the 73-amino acid insertion is
a determinant required for degradation remains to be determined. The
biological relevance of two IRPs in cells is unclear. Both IRP1 and
IRP2 bind IREs with high affinity (20, 24, 27) and function as translational
repressors of IRE-containing RNAs in vitro(20) .
First, it is possible that IRP2 binds to a subset of IRE-containing
mRNAs containing slightly different sequences. A recent study using in vitro synthesized IREs demonstrated that mouse IRP2 has a
preference for specific IRE sequences, suggesting that IRP2 may bind to
specific IRE-containing mRNAs in vivo(39) . Second,
since IRP2 is present in the highest amounts in skeletal muscle and
heart, this suggests that IRP2 may regulate muscle-specific
mRNAs(29) . Third, IRP2 RNA binding activity is decreased in
the livers of rats treated with chemicals to induce oxidative stress (22) and increased in regenerating rat livers(21) ,
suggesting that IRP2 is regulated under a variety of physiological
states. It is unclear whether these effects are due to alterations in
intracellular iron levels or to stimuli other than iron. A recent
study suggested that iron-mediated regulation of IRP2 degradation may
be cell-specific(27) . A c-myc-tagged recombinant IRP2
expressed in HeLa cells treated with iron or hemin for 16 h resulted in
a decrease in RNA binding activity, but no change in the amount of
protein. Our experiments analyzing the iron-mediated regulation of
endogenous IRP2 in HeLa cells treated with iron for up to 24 h showed a
steady decrease in RNA binding activity and protein levels up to 6 h,
after which RNA binding activity and protein levels gradually
increased. The half-life of recombinant IRP2 expressed in RD-4 cells
was greater than 24 h in desferrioxamine-treated cells and 6 h in
iron-treated cells(27) . By contrast, our data indicated that
the half-life of endogenous IRP2 in untreated FTO2B cells was 6 h and
1.5 h in iron-treated cells. The discrepancies between these studies
may reflect differences in experimental design due to use of
overexpressed protein or to different cell growth conditions. The
regulation of gene expression by specific proteolysis provides a way by
which cells can change the concentration of specific proteins depending
on the metabolic state of the cell. The iron-dependent regulation of
IRP2 turnover may be similar to the mechanisms regulating the mammalian
enzyme ornithine decarboxylase. Ornithine decarboxylase is the first
enzyme in the polyamine biosynthesis pathway and is degraded when
intracellular polyamine levels increase(40) . Polyamines induce
antizyme, a protein which binds with high affinity to ornithine
decarboxylase (41, 42) and targets ornithine
decarboxylase for degradation by the proteasome(37) . Thus, it
is possible that IRP2, like ornithine decarboxylase, may utilize other
proteins that specify its degradation during changes in intracellular
iron levels. The characterization of the other components responsible
for IRP2 iron-mediated degradation will provide a clearer understanding
of the mechanism by which IRP2 is targeted and degraded by the
proteasome.
FOOTNOTES
- *
- This work was supported by National
Institutes of Health Grant GM45201 (to E. A. L.) and by National Cancer
Institute Grant CA4201 (to the Protein Core Facility of the Utah Cancer
Center at the University of Utah). The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This
article must therefore by hereby marked
``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
- §
- To whom all correspondence should be addressed:
University of Utah, Bldg. 533, Rm. 4220, HMBG, Salt Lake City, UT
84112. Tel.: 801-585-5002; Fax: 801-585-3501.
- (
) - The abbreviations used are: IRP1 and IRP2, iron
regulatory proteins 1 and 2; IRE, iron-responsive element; FAC, ferric
ammonium citrate; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; MG-132,
carbobenzoxyl-leucinyl-leucinyl-leucinal-H.
- (
) - F.
L. Stassen, personal communication.
- (
) - J. D.
Phillips and E. A. Leibold, unpublished data.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Dennis Winge, Liz Wyckoff, Andy Sewell, and
members of the laboratory for insightful comments during the course of
this work and for critical readings of the manuscripts.
REFERENCES
- Leibold, E. A., and Guo, B. (1992) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 12,345-368
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Klausner, R. D., Rouault, T. A., and Harford, J. B. (1993) Cell 72,19-28
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Theil, E. C. (1993) Biofactors 4,87-93
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Beinert, H., and Kennedy, M. C. (1993) FASEB J. 7,1442-1449
[Abstract]
- Walden, W. E., Patino, M. M., and Gaffield, L. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264,13765-13769
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Goossen, B., Caughman, S. W., Harford, J. B., Klausner, R. D., and Hentze, M. W. (1990) EMBO J. 9,4127-4133
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gray, N. K., and Hentze, M. W. (1994) EMBO J. 13,3882-3891
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Casey, J. L., Hentze, M. W., Koeller, D. M., Caughman, S. W., Rouault, T. A., Klausner, R. D., and Harford, J. B. (1988) Science 240,924-928
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Mullner, E. W., Neupert, B., and Kuhn, L. C. (1989) Cell 58,373-382
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Binder, R., Horowitz, J. A., Basilion, J. P., Koeller, D. M., Klausner, R. D., and Harford, J. B. (1994) EMBO J. 13,1969-1980
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rouault, T. A., Tang, C. K., Kaptain, S., Burgess, W. H., Haile, D. J., Samaniego, F., McBride, O. W., Harford, J. B., and Klausner, R. D. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87,7958-7962
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yu, Y., Radisky, E., and Leibold, E. A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,19005-19010
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Rouault, T. A., Stout, C. D., Kaptain, S., Harford, J. B., and Klausner, R. D. (1991) Cell 64,881-883
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kennedy, M. C., Mende-Mueller, L., Blondin, G. A., and Beinert, H. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89,11730-11734
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kaptain, S., Downey, W. E., Tang, C., Philpott, C., Haile, D., Orloff, D. G., Harford, J. B., Rouault, T. A., and Klausner, R. D. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88,10109-10113
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Basilion, J. P., Rouault, T. A., Massinople, C. M., Klausner, R. D., and Burgess, W. H. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91,574-578
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Swenson, G. R., and Walden, W. E. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22,2627-2633
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Philpott, C. C., Klausner, R. D., and Rouault, T. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91,7321-7325
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Leibold, E. A., and Munro, H. N. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85,2171-2175
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Guo, B., Yu, Y., and Leibold, E. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,24252-24260
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cairo, G., and Pietrangelo, A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,6405-6409
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cairo, G., Tacchini, L., Pogliaghi, G., Anzon, E., Tomasi, A., and Bernelli-Zazzera, A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 270,700-703
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Rouault, T. A., Haile, D. J., Downey, W. E., Philpott, C. C., Tang, C., Samaniego, F., Chin, J., Paul, I., Orloff, D., Harford, J. B., and Klausner, R. D. (1992) Biometals 5,131-140
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Henderson, B. R., Seiser, C., and Kuhn, L. C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 268,27327-27334
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kim, H., Klausner, R. D., and Rouault, T. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270,4983-4986
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tang, C. K., Chin, J., Harford, J. B., Klausner, R. D., and Rouault, T. A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267,24466-24470
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Samaniego, F., Chin, J., Iwai, K., Rouault, T. A., and Klausner, R. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,30904-30910
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Feinberg, A. P., and Vogelstein, B. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 132,6-13
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Guo, B., Brown, F. M., Phillips, J. D., Yu, Y., and Leibold, E. A. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270,16529-16535
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Rechsteiner, M., Hoffman, L., and Dubiel, W. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268,6065-6068
[Free Full Text]
- Ciechanover, A. (1994) Cell 79,13-21
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Palombella, V. J., Rando, O. J., Goldberg, A. L., and Maniatis, T. (1994) Cell 78,773-785
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rock, K. L., Gramm, C., Rothstein, L., Clark, K., Stein, R., Dick, L., Hwang, D., and Goldberg, A. L. (1994) Cell 78,761-771
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Haile, D. J., Rouault, T. A., Harford, J. B., Kennedy, M. C., Blondin, G. A., Beinert, H., and Klausner, R. D. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89,11735-11739
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Emery-Goodman, A., Hirling, H., Scarpellino, L., Henderson, B., and Kuhn, L. C. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21,1457-1461
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hirling, H., Henderson, B. R., and Kuhn, L. C. (1994) EMBO J. 13,453-461
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Murakami, Y., Matsufuji, S., Kameji, T., Hayashi, S., Igarashi, K., Tamura, T., Tanaka, K., and Ichihara, A. (1992) Nature 360,597-599
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rogers, S., Wells, R., and Rechsteiner, M. (1986) Science 234,364-368
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Henderson, B. R., Menotti, E., Bonnard, C., and Kuhn, L. C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269,17481-17489
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- McConlogue, L., Dana, S. L., and Coffino, P. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biol. 6,2865-2871
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Li, X., and Coffino, P. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12,3556-3562
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Li, X., and Coffino, P. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14,87-92
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Deck, A. Vasanthakumar, S. A. Anderson, J. B. Goforth, M. C. Kennedy, W. E. Antholine, and R. S. Eisenstein
Evidence That Phosphorylation of Iron Regulatory Protein 1 at Serine 138 Destabilizes the [4Fe-4S] Cluster in Cytosolic Aconitase by Enhancing 4Fe-3Fe Cycling
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 8, 2009;
284(19):
12701 - 12709.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Kerenyi, F. Grebien, H. Gehart, M. Schifrer, M. Artaker, B. Kovacic, H. Beug, R. Moriggl, and E. W. Mullner
Stat5 regulates cellular iron uptake of erythroid cells via IRP-2 and TfR-1
Blood,
November 1, 2008;
112(9):
3878 - 3888.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. C. Andrews
Forging a field: the golden age of iron biology
Blood,
July 15, 2008;
112(2):
219 - 230.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Romney, C. Thacker, and E. A. Leibold
An Iron Enhancer Element in the FTN-1 Gene Directs Iron-dependent Expression in Caenorhabditis elegans Intestine
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 11, 2008;
283(2):
716 - 725.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Wang, X. Di, R. B. D'Agostino Jr., S. V. Torti, and F. M. Torti
Excess Capacity of the Iron Regulatory Protein System
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 24, 2007;
282(34):
24650 - 24659.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wang, C. Fillebeen, G. Chen, A. Biederbick, R. Lill, and K. Pantopoulos
Iron-Dependent Degradation of Apo-IRP1 by the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
April 1, 2007;
27(7):
2423 - 2430.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Chen, C. Fillebeen, J. Wang, and K. Pantopoulos
Overexpression of iron regulatory protein 1 suppresses growth of tumor xenografts
Carcinogenesis,
April 1, 2007;
28(4):
785 - 791.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Arnaud, I. Murgia, J. Boucherez, J.-F. Briat, F. Cellier, and F. Gaymard
An Iron-induced Nitric Oxide Burst Precedes Ubiquitin-dependent Protein Degradation for Arabidopsis AtFer1 Ferritin Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 18, 2006;
281(33):
23579 - 23588.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. I. Lind, F. Missirlis, O. Melefors, H. Uhrigshardt, K. Kirby, J. P. Phillips, K. Soderhall, and T. A. Rouault
Of Two Cytosolic Aconitases Expressed in Drosophila, Only One Functions as an Iron-regulatory Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 7, 2006;
281(27):
18707 - 18714.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Schranzhofer, M. Schifrer, J. A. Cabrera, S. Kopp, P. Chiba, H. Beug, and E. W. Mullner
Remodeling the regulation of iron metabolism during erythroid differentiation to ensure efficient heme biosynthesis
Blood,
May 15, 2006;
107(10):
4159 - 4167.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Donovan, C. N. Roy, and N. C. Andrews
The Ins and Outs of Iron Homeostasis
Physiology,
April 1, 2006;
21(2):
115 - 123.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Benchoua, Y. Trioulier, D. Zala, M.-C. Gaillard, N. Lefort, N. Dufour, F. Saudou, J.-M. Elalouf, E. Hirsch, P. Hantraye, et al.
Involvement of Mitochondrial Complex II Defects in Neuronal Death Produced by N-Terminus Fragment of Mutated Huntingtin
Mol. Biol. Cell,
April 1, 2006;
17(4):
1652 - 1663.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Martinez, R. A. Ugalde, and M. Almiron
Dimeric Brucella abortus Irr protein controls its own expression and binds haem
Microbiology,
October 1, 2005;
151(10):
3427 - 3433.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Rincker, S. L. Clarke, R. S. Eisenstein, J. E. Link, and G. M. Hill
Effects of iron supplementation on binding activity of iron regulatory proteins and the subsequent effect on growth performance and indices of hematological and mineral status of young pigs
J Anim Sci,
September 1, 2005;
83(9):
2137 - 2145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wang, G. Chen, and K. Pantopoulos
Nitric Oxide Inhibits the Degradation of IRP2
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
February 15, 2005;
25(4):
1347 - 1353.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. R. Starzynski, P. Lipinski, J.-C. Drapier, A. Diet, E. Smuda, T. Bartlomiejczyk, M. A. Gralak, and M. Kruszewski
Down-regulation of Iron Regulatory Protein 1 Activities and Expression in Superoxide Dismutase 1 Knock-out Mice Is Not Associated with Alterations in Iron Metabolism
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 11, 2005;
280(6):
4207 - 4212.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Liu, Z. Popovich, and D. M. Templeton
Global Genomic Approaches to the Iron-Regulated Proteome
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci.,
January 1, 2005;
35(3):
230 - 239.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. G. Meyron-Holtz, M. C. Ghosh, and T. A. Rouault
Mammalian Tissue Oxygen Levels Modulate Iron-Regulatory Protein Activities in Vivo
Science,
December 17, 2004;
306(5704):
2087 - 2090.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Nemeth, M. S. Tuttle, J. Powelson, M. B. Vaughn, A. Donovan, D. M. Ward, T. Ganz, and J. Kaplan
Hepcidin Regulates Cellular Iron Efflux by Binding to Ferroportin and Inducing Its Internalization
Science,
December 17, 2004;
306(5704):
2090 - 2093.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Jeong, T. A. Rouault, and R. L. Levine
Identification of a Heme-sensing Domain in Iron Regulatory Protein 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 29, 2004;
279(44):
45450 - 45454.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. R. Connor, X. S. Wang, S. M. Patton, S. L. Menzies, J. C. Troncoso, C. J. Earley, and R. P. Allen
Decreased transferrin receptor expression by neuromelanin cells in restless legs syndrome
Neurology,
May 11, 2004;
62(9):
1563 - 1567.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Mayo, P. Kohlhepp, D. Zhang, and J. J. Winzerling
Effects of sham air and cigarette smoke on A549 lung cells: implications for iron-mediated oxidative damage
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
April 1, 2004;
286(4):
L866 - L876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wang, G. Chen, M. Muckenthaler, B. Galy, M. W. Hentze, and K. Pantopoulos
Iron-Mediated Degradation of IRP2, an Unexpected Pathway Involving a 2-Oxoglutarate-Dependent Oxygenase Activity
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
February 1, 2004;
24(3):
954 - 965.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kim, S. S. Wing, and P. Ponka
S-Nitrosylation of IRP2 Regulates Its Stability via the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
January 1, 2004;
24(1):
330 - 337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Hanson, M. L. Rawlins, and E. A. Leibold
Oxygen and Iron Regulation of Iron Regulatory Protein 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 10, 2003;
278(41):
40337 - 40342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Fillebeen, D. Chahine, A. Caltagirone, P. Segal, and K. Pantopoulos
A Phosphomimetic Mutation at Ser-138 Renders Iron Regulatory Protein 1 Sensitive to Iron-Dependent Degradation
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
October 1, 2003;
23(19):
6973 - 6981.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Bertinato and M. R. L'Abbe
Copper Modulates the Degradation of Copper Chaperone for Cu,Zn Superoxide Dismutase by the 26 S Proteosome
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 12, 2003;
278(37):
35071 - 35078.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Iwai
An Ubiquitin Ligase Recognizing a Protein Oxidized by Iron: Implications for the Turnover of Oxidatively Damaged Proteins
J. Biochem.,
August 1, 2003;
134(2):
175 - 182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D.-K. Kang, J. Jeong, S. K. Drake, N. B. Wehr, T. A. Rouault, and R. L. Levine
Iron Regulatory Protein 2 as Iron Sensor. IRON-DEPENDENT OXIDATIVE MODIFICATION OF CYSTEINE
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 18, 2003;
278(17):
14857 - 14864.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. ALLERSON, A. MARTINEZ, E. YIKILMAZ, and T. A. ROUAULT
A high-capacity RNA affinity column for the purification of human IRP1 and IRP2 overexpressed in Pichia pastoris
RNA,
March 1, 2003;
9(3):
364 - 374.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. L. Gourley, S. B. Parker, B. J. Jones, K. B. Zumbrennen, and E. A. Leibold
Cytosolic Aconitase and Ferritin Are Regulated by Iron in Caenorhabditis elegans
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 24, 2003;
278(5):
3227 - 3234.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. M. Qian, H. Li, H. Sun, and K. Ho
Targeted Drug Delivery via the Transferrin Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis Pathway
Pharmacol. Rev.,
December 1, 2002;
54(4):
561 - 587.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. GRUNE, T. REINHECKEL, J. A. NORTH, R. LI, P. B. BESCOS, R. SHRINGARPURE, and K. J. A. DAVIES
Ezrin turnover and cell shape changes catalyzed by proteasome in oxidatively stressed cells
FASEB J,
October 1, 2002;
16(12):
1602 - 1610.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ashizuka, T. Fukuda, T. Nakamura, K. Shirasuna, K. Iwai, H. Izumi, K. Kohno, M. Kuwano, and T. Uchiumi
Novel Translational Control through an Iron-Responsive Element by Interaction of Multifunctional Protein YB-1 and IRP2
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
September 15, 2002;
22(18):
6375 - 6383.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Yamaguchi-Iwai, R. Ueta, A. Fukunaka, and R. Sasaki
Subcellular Localization of Aft1 Transcription Factor Responds to Iron Status in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 17, 2002;
277(21):
18914 - 18918.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. N. Roy and C. A. Enns
Iron homeostasis: new tales from the crypt
Blood,
December 15, 2000;
96(13):
4020 - 4027.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-Y. Yeh, M. Yeh, J. A. Watkins, J. Rodriguez-Paris, and J. Glass
Dietary iron induces rapid changes in rat intestinal divalent metal transporter expression
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
November 1, 2000;
279(5):
G1070 - G1079.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Lipinski, J.-C. Drapier, L. Oliveira, H. Retmanska, B. Sochanowicz, and M. Kruszewski
Intracellular iron status as a hallmark of mammalian cell susceptibility to oxidative stress: a study of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell lines differentially sensitive to H2O2
Blood,
May 1, 2000;
95(9):
2960 - 2966.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kim and P. Ponka
Effects of Interferon-gamma and Lipopolysaccharide on Macrophage Iron Metabolism Are Mediated by Nitric Oxide-induced Degradation of Iron Regulatory Protein 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 25, 2000;
275(9):
6220 - 6226.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K.-Y. Yeh, M. Yeh, and J. Glass
Glucocorticoids and dietary iron regulate postnatal intestinal heavy and light ferritin expression in rats
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol,
February 1, 2000;
278(2):
G217 - G226.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Mikulits, M. Schranzhofer, A. Bauer, H. Dolznig, L. Lobmayr, A. A. Infante, H. Beug, and E. W. Mullner
Impaired Ferritin mRNA Translation in Primary Erythroid Progenitors: Shift to Iron-Dependent Regulation by the v-ErbA Oncoprotein
Blood,
December 15, 1999;
94(12):
4321 - 4332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kim and P. Ponka
Control of Transferrin Receptor Expression via Nitric Oxide-mediated Modulation of Iron-regulatory Protein 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 12, 1999;
274(46):
33035 - 33042.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Allerson, M. Cazzola, and T. A. Rouault
Clinical Severity and Thermodynamic Effects of Iron-responsive Element Mutations in Hereditary Hyperferritinemia-Cataract Syndrome
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 10, 1999;
274(37):
26439 - 26447.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Posch, H. Sutterluety, T. Skern, and C. Seiser
Characterization of the Translation-dependent Step during Iron-regulated Decay of Transferrin Receptor mRNA
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 4, 1999;
274(23):
16611 - 16618.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Gegout, J. Schlegl, B. Schlager, M. W. Hentze, J. Reinbolt, B. Ehresmann, C. Ehresmann, and P. Romby
Ligand-induced Structural Alterations in Human Iron Regulatory Protein-1 Revealed by Protein Footprinting
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 21, 1999;
274(21):
15052 - 15058.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Hanson, L. M. Foot, and E. A. Leibold
Hypoxia Post-translationally Activates Iron-regulatory Protein 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 19, 1999;
274(8):
5047 - 5052.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Wu, A. Polack, and R. Dalla-Favera
Coordinated Regulation of Iron-Controlling Genes, H-Ferritin and IRP2, by c-MYC
Science,
January 29, 1999;
283(5402):
676 - 679.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Oliveira, C. Bouton, and J.-C. Drapier
Thioredoxin Activation of Iron Regulatory Proteins. REDOX REGULATION OF RNA BINDING AFTER EXPOSURE TO NITRIC OXIDE
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 1, 1999;
274(1):
516 - 521.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Brown, S. A. Anderson, D. W. Steffen, T. B. Carpenter, M. C. Kennedy, W. E. Walden, and R. S. Eisenstein
Novel role of phosphorylation in Fe-S cluster stability revealed by phosphomimetic mutations at Ser-138 of iron regulatory protein 1
PNAS,
December 22, 1998;
95(26):
15235 - 15240.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Ke, J. Wu, E. A. Leibold, W. E. Walden, and E. C. Theil
Loops and Bulge/Loops in Iron-responsive Element Isoforms Influence Iron Regulatory Protein Binding. FINE-TUNING OF mRNA REGULATION?
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 11, 1998;
273(37):
23637 - 23640.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. S. Goessling, D. P. Mascotti, and R. E. Thach
Involvement of Heme in the Degradation of Iron-regulatory Protein 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 15, 1998;
273(20):
12555 - 12557.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Iwai, S. K. Drake, N. B. Wehr, A. M. Weissman, T. LaVaute, N. Minato, R. D. Klausner, R. L. Levine, and T. A. Rouault
Iron-dependent oxidation, ubiquitination, and degradation of iron regulatory protein 2: Implications for degradation of oxidized proteins
PNAS,
April 28, 1998;
95(9):
4924 - 4928.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bouton, L. Oliveira, and J.-C. Drapier
Converse Modulation of IRP1 and IRP2 by Immunological Stimuli in Murine RAW 264.7 Macrophages
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 17, 1998;
273(16):
9403 - 9408.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. S. Hanson and E. A. Leibold
Regulation of Iron Regulatory Protein 1 during Hypoxia and Hypoxia/Reoxygenation
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 27, 1998;
273(13):
7588 - 7593.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. S. Chen, K. P. Blemings, K. L. Schalinske, and R. S. Eisenstein
Dietary Iron Intake Rapidly Influences Iron Regulatory Proteins, Ferritin Subunits and Mitochondrial Aconitase in Rat Liver
J. Nutr.,
March 1, 1998;
128(3):
525 - 535.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Schalinske, O. S. Chen, and R. S. Eisenstein
Iron Differentially Stimulates Translation of Mitochondrial Aconitase and Ferritin mRNAs in Mammalian Cells. IMPLICATIONS FOR IRON REGULATORY PROTEINS AS REGULATORS OF MITOCHONDRIAL CITRATE UTILIZATION
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 6, 1998;
273(6):
3740 - 3746.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Menotti, B. R. Henderson, and L. C. Kuhn
Translational Regulation of mRNAs with Distinct IRE Sequences by Iron Regulatory Proteins 1 and 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 16, 1998;
273(3):
1821 - 1824.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Schalinske, K. P. Blemings, D. W. Steffen, O. S. Chen, and R. S. Eisenstein
Iron regulatory protein 1 is not required for the modulation of ferritin and transferrin receptor expression by iron in a murine pro-B lymphocyte cell line
PNAS,
September 30, 1997;
94(20):
10681 - 10686.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Bouton, H. Hirling, and J.-C. Drapier
Redox Modulation of Iron Regulatory Proteins by Peroxynitrite
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 8, 1997;
272(32):
19969 - 19975.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. R. Chitambar and J. P. Wereley
Resistance to the Antitumor Agent Gallium Nitrate in Human Leukemic Cells Is Associated with Decreased Gallium/Iron Uptake, Increased Activity of Iron Regulatory Protein-1, and Decreased Ferritin Production
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 2, 1997;
272(18):
12151 - 12157.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Cairo, S. Recalcati, G. Montosi, E. Castrusini, D. Conte, and A. Pietrangelo
Inappropriately High Iron Regulatory Protein Activity in Monocytes of Patients With Genetic Hemochromatosis
Blood,
April 1, 1997;
89(7):
2546 - 2553.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. S. Chen, K. L. Schalinske, and R. S. Eisenstein
Dietary Iron Intake Modulates the Activity of Iron Regulatory Proteins and the Abundance of Ferritin and Mitochondrial Aconitase in Rat Liver
J. Nutr.,
February 1, 1997;
127(2):
238 - 248.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P Ponka
Tissue-specific regulation of iron metabolism and heme synthesis: distinct control mechanisms in erythroid cells
Blood,
January 1, 1997;
89(1):
1 - 25.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. R. Henderson, E. Menotti, and L. C. Kühn
Iron Regulatory Proteins 1 and 2 Bind Distinct Sets of RNA Target Sequences
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 1, 1996;
271(9):
4900 - 4908.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. S. Musil, A.-C. N. Le, J. K. VanSlyke, and L. M. Roberts
Regulation of Connexin Degradation as a Mechanism to Increase Gap Junction Assembly and Function
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 11, 2000;
275(33):
25207 - 25215.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. M. Brown, M. C. Kennedy, W. E. Antholine, R. S. Eisenstein, and W. E. Walden
Detection of a [3Fe-4S] Cluster Intermediate of Cytosolic Aconitase in Yeast Expressing Iron Regulatory Protein 1. INSIGHTS INTO THE MECHANISM OF Fe-S CLUSTER CYCLING
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 22, 2002;
277(9):
7246 - 7254.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Narahari, R. Ma, M. Wang, and W. E. Walden
The Aconitase Function of Iron Regulatory Protein 1. GENETIC STUDIES IN YEAST IMPLICATE ITS ROLE IN IRON-MEDIATED REDOX REGULATION
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 19, 2000;
275(21):
16227 - 16234.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. H. Sutter, E. Laughner, and G. L. Semenza
Hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha protein expression is controlled by oxygen-regulated ubiquitination that is disrupted by deletions and missense mutations
PNAS,
April 25, 2000;
97(9):
4748 - 4753.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Oliveira and J.-C. Drapier
Down-regulation of iron regulatory protein 1 gene expression by nitric oxide
PNAS,
June 6, 2000;
97(12):
6550 - 6555.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|