Volume 270,
Number 43,
Issue of October 27, 1995 pp. 25475-25480
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
The
Mouse APLP2 Gene
CHROMOSOMAL LOCALIZATION AND PROMOTER CHARACTERIZATION (*)
(Received for publication, May 10,
1995; and in revised form, July 19, 1995)
Cornelia S.
von Koch
(1), (§),
Debomoy K.
Lahiri
(3),
Andrew L.
Mammen
(1),
Neal
G.
Copeland
(4),
Debra J.
Gilbert
(4),
Nancy A.
Jenkins
(4),
Sangram S.
Sisodia(§)
(2)(¶)From the
(1)Departments of Neuroscience and
(2)Pathology and the Neuropathology Laboratory, The
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
21205-2196, the
(3)Department of Psychiatry and Medical and
Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine,
Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, and the
(4)Mammalian Genetics Laboratory, ABL-Basic Research
Program, NCI, National Institutes of Health, Frederick Cancer Research
and Development Center, Frederick, Maryland 21702
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Senile plaques are primarily comprised of deposits of the
-amyloid protein derived from larger amyloid precursor proteins
(APPs). APP is a member of a gene family, including amyloid
precursor-like proteins APLP1 and APLP2.
Using interspecific mouse
backcross mapping, we localized the mouse APLP2 gene to the
proximal region of mouse chromosome 9, syntenic with a region of human
11q.
We cloned an
1.2-kilobase mouse genomic fragment
containing the APLP2 gene promoter. The APLP2 promoter lacks a typical TATA box, is GC-rich, and contains
several sequences for transcription factor binding. S1 nuclease
protection analysis revealed the presence of multiple transcription
start sites. The lack of a TATA box, the presence of a high GC content,
and multiple transcription start sites place the APLP2 promoter in the class of promoters of ``housekeeping
genes.''
Regulatory regions within the promoter were assayed by
transfection of mouse N2a and Ltk
cells with
constructs containing progressive 5`-deletions of the APLP2 promoter fused to the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyl transferase
(CAT) reporter gene. A minimal region that includes sequences 99 bp
upstream of the predominant transcription start site of the APLP2 promoter was sufficient to direct high levels of CAT expression.
INTRODUCTION
Senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles constitute two of the
neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease. The
predominant constituent of senile plaques is the 4-kDa
-amyloid
peptide, derived from larger amyloid precursor proteins
(APPs)(
)(1, 2) . APP is a member of a
larger gene family including amyloid precursor-like proteins APLP1 and
APLP2(3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) .
Notably, APLP2 shares considerable sequence homology with APP with the
exception of the
-amyloid
domain(5, 7, 8) . In earlier studies, we
demonstrated that APLP2 matures through the same unusual
secretory/cleavage pathway as APP. Furthermore, APLP2 pre-mRNAs are alternatively spliced to generate at least four
alternatively spliced transcripts(9, 10) . Using in situ hybridization and reverse transcriptase-polymerase
chain reaction (RT-PCR) approaches, we and others have demonstrated
that in most adult tissues, APLP2 and APP mRNAs were
expressed at similar, if not identical, levels. There are several
exceptions; notably, in liver APP mRNA is essentially
undetectable, but APLP2 mRNA is fairly
abundant(5, 7, 9, 11) . In recent
studies, we have also demonstrated that specific alternatively spliced APLP2 mRNAs are differentially expressed in the olfactory
epithelium(12) . Moreover, APLP2 is highly enriched in
olfactory sensory axons and axon terminals in glomeruli. On the other
hand, APP is expressed, albeit at lower levels, in olfactory
sensory neurons and to a lesser extent in sensory axons. This suggests
that APLP2 and APP are regulated differentially in
selected neuronal populations.
In order to assess whether the
differential levels of APLP2 and APP expression may
be a reflection of differences in sequence elements contained within
respective promoters, we cloned and characterized an
1.2-kb
fragment of the mouse APLP2 gene promoter. The mouse APP promoter has been characterized previously(13) . We show
that the mouse APLP2 gene promoter contains several features
characteristic of promoters of ``housekeeping genes''; these
include the lack of a typical TATA box, the presence of a high GC
content, and multiple transcription start sites. These latter features
of the APLP2 promoter are similar to features described for
mouse, rat, and human APP promoter
regions(13, 14, 15, 16, 17) .
We assessed whether the APLP2 promoter contained positive or
negative regulatory elements by transfecting mouse neuroblastoma (N2a)
cells and mouse fibroblast (Ltk
) cells with
constructs containing progressive 5`-truncated promoter fragments of
the APLP2 gene fused with the reporter gene chloramphenicol
acetyl transferase (CAT). We demonstrate that CAT expression remains
fairly constant across different deletion constructs in both N2a and
Ltk
cells and that a fragment representing just 99 bp
upstream of the predominant transcription start site is sufficient to
direct high levels of transgene expression in both cell lines.
Interestingly, 5`-deletion studies of the human, mouse, and rat
promoters also revealed that
100 bp of the respective promoters
can drive high levels of expression of reporter
genes(13, 15, 18) .
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Interspecific Mouse Backcross
Mapping
Interspecific backcross progeny were generated by mating
(C57BL/6J
Mus spretus)F
females and
C57BL/6J males as described(19) . A total of 205 N
mice were used to map the APLP2 locus (see
``Results and Discussion'' for details). DNA isolation,
restriction enzyme digestion, agarose gel electrophoresis, Southern
blot transfer, and hybridization were performed essentially as
described(20) . All blots were prepared with
Hybond-N
nylon membrane (Amersham Corp.). The probe,
an
2.65-kb XhoI/EcoRI fragment of mouse cDNA,
was labeled with [
P]dCTP using a nick
translation labeling kit (Boehringer Mannheim); washing was done to a
final stringency of 0.1
SSCP, 0.1% SDS, 65 °C. Major
fragments of 21.0, 3.5, 2.9, and 2.5 kb were detected in ScaI-digested C57BL/6J DNA, and major fragments of 6.6, 4.2,
and 2.7 kb were detected in ScaI-digested M. spretus DNA. The presence or absence of the 6.6-, 4.2-, and 2.7-kb M.
spretus-specific fragments, which cosegregated, was followed in
backcross mice.A description of the probes and restriction fragment
length polymorphisms for the loci linked to APLP2 including
low density lipoprotein receptor (Ldlr), preproenkephalin (Penk), and E26 avian leukemia oncogene (Ets1) has
been reported previously (21) . Recombination distances were
calculated as described (22) using the computer program SPRETUS
MADNESS. Gene order was determined by minimizing the number of
recombination events required to explain the allele distribution
patterns.
Library Screening
To isolate the promoter of mouse APLP2, a 67-bp fragment of the 5`-untranslated region of mouse APLP2, position -64 to +3 with respect to the
translation start codon, was generated by PCR and labeled with
[
-
P]dATP by random primer-initiated
synthesis. This probe was used to screen a genomic DNA library,
prepared from 129 SV mouse embryonic stem cells cloned into
EMBL3.
Hybridization and wash conditions were 50% formamide, 6
SSC at
42 °C for 16 h, and 2
SSC at 50 °C for 15 min, followed
by 0.2
SSC at 50 °C for 15 min, respectively.One
positive phage contained a 14-kb SalI-SalI fragment,
which included 2.8 kb of sequence upstream of the translation start
codon. A 2.84-kb SalI-HindIII restriction fragment
from this phage was subsequently subcloned into Bluescript
KS
(Stratagene) to generate plasmid pAPLP2P and
partially sequenced with Sequenase (U.S. Biochemical Corp.). Sequences
were analyzed for putative transcription factor binding sites using a
MacVector version 4.1 software package.
RNA Isolation
Total RNA was isolated by
homogenization of mouse thymus, heart, brain, liver, kidney, lung,
testes, and spleen in 4 M guanidine thiocyanate and
centrifugation of the lysate over a 5.7 M cesium chloride
cushion (23) . Poly(A)
RNA from Chinese
hamster ovary (CHO) cells was prepared similarly with the addition of
fractionation on an oligo(dT)-Sepharose column(24) . Total
cytoplasmic RNA, from confluent dishes of mouse neuroblastoma (N2a)
cells and mouse fibroblast (Ltk
) cells, was isolated
as described(25) .
S1 Nuclease Analysis
A 534-bp KpnI-HindIII fragment, extending from 494 bp upstream
of the translation start site to 40 bp into exon 1, was liberated from
pAPLP2P and subcloned into KpnI-HindIII-digested
Bluescript KS
(Stratagene), to generate plasmid
pAPLP2S1. This plasmid was linearized with HindIII, which lies
40 bp 3` to the translation start codon, and the 5` ends were
dephosphorylated with calf alkaline phosphatase. S1 nuclease probe was
prepared by 5` end-labeling with [
-
P]ATP.
For S1 nuclease analysis (25) 0.02 pmol of
P-end-labeled double-stranded DNA probe was mixed with
either 20 µg of total RNA or with 1 µg of poly(A)
RNA and hybridized in a solution containing 80% formamide, 0.4 M NaCl, 40 mM PIPES, pH 6.4, and 1 mM EDTA
for 12-16 h at 57 °C. Samples were then diluted 15-fold with
ice-cold S1 nuclease buffer to yield a final concentration of 1
S1 buffer (0.2 M NaCl, 30 mM NaOAc, pH 4.5, 5 mM ZnCl
, and 0.05 µg/µl salmon sperm DNA) and
treated with 100 units of S1 nuclease at 25 °C for 1 h.
S1-resistant hybrids were fractionated by electrophoresis on 4%
acrylamide, 9 M urea-containing gels, and the protected probe
was visualized by autoradiography.
RT-PCR
To determine the endogenous levels of APLP2 and APP mRNA in mouse N2a and mouse
Ltk
cells, 1 µg of total cytoplasmic RNA was
reverse-transcribed in the presence of reverse transcriptase and random
hexamer primers (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). The first strand cDNA
obtained from reverse-transcribed RNA was then subjected to PCR with
degenerate primers, APP/APLP2S and APP/APLP2AS(5) . Primer
APP/APLP2S is GAGCAYGCCCRYTTCCAGAARGC, where Y = C + T and
R = A + G, and encodes APLP2-751 residues
386-392 or APP-751 residues 368-374. Primer
APP/APLP2AS is GGAGGTGTGTCATMACCTGGGA, where M = A + C, and
is complementary to sequences that encode APLP2-751 residues 527-532 or APP-751 residues
509-514(5) . PCR was performed at an annealing
temperature of 58 °C for 20 cycles. PCR generated 444-bp products
consisting of a mixture of APP and APLP2 cDNAs, which
were subsequently digested with XhoI to specifically cleave
the APP-related species. Digested PCR products were
fractionated on 2% agarose gels and stained with ethidium bromide. PCR
products generated from plasmids encoding mouse APLP2 and
mouse APP templates were used as controls.
Construction of Deletion Plasmids
A
2.8-kb SalI-BamHI fragment, extending from
2.7 kb
upstream of the transcription start codon to 62 bp of exon 1, was
isolated by PCR using a sense primer EMBL
(GCTTCTCATAGAGTCTTGCAGACAAACTGCGCAAC, located in the left arm of
EMBL3 polylinker; (26) ) and an antisense primer BamHI+62 (CCGGGATCCCTCTCCCCGTCTCTCGCACAGCCAGGCTACAG,
located from +62 to +31 with respect to the transcription
start codon), in the presence of
-APLP2 DNA and subcloned
into SalI-BamHI-digested pBLCAT3(27) , to
generate plasmid pAPLP2PCAT. pAPLP2PCAT was digested with PstI
and religated to generate plasmid pAPLP2PCAT-380. During this
digestion, a 590-bp PstI-PstI fragment was isolated
and cloned in the sense orientation into PstI-digested
pAPLP2PCAT-380 to generate plasmid pAPLP2PCAT-971. APLP2 promoter fragments range from -380 to +62 in
pAPLP2PCAT-380 and from -971 to +62 in pAPLP2PCAT-971 (with
respect to the transcription start site).Additional promoter
deletions were prepared by PCR using the following sense primers linked
to a HindIII site, GCCAAGCTTCACGGTCTACCCGCGAAG,
GCCAAGCTTAGCCTCGGGTCCAGAG, GCCAAGCTTGAGTCGGTGTATCCGTGCT, and
GCCAAGCTTGTTATGCCGGCTCGTATTG, respectively, with antisense primer BamHI+62 in the presence of pAPLP2P. The resulting 334-bp HindIII-BamHI (-272 to +62), 302-bp HindIII-BamHI (-240 to +62), 222-bp HindIII-BamHI (-160 to +62), and 161-bp HindIII-BamHI (-99 to +62) fragments were
ligated to HindIII-BamHI-digested pBLCAT3 to generate
plasmids pAPLP2PCAT-272, pAPLP2PCAT-240, pAPLP2PCAT-160, and
pAPLP2PCAT-99, respectively. pRSVCAT(28, 29) ,
including the Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat as a promoter,
was used as a positive control, and pBLCAT3 containing no insert was
used as a negative control.
Cell Culture, Transfection, and CAT Assay
Mouse
N2a cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
and reduced serum-modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine
serum. Cells were plated 22-26 h prior to transfection at a
density of 0.25
10
cells/well in a 6-well dish. N2a
cells were transiently transfected with 2 µg of double
CsCl-purified DNA using a calcium phosphate co-precipitation
procedure(30) . 0.12 µg of pBLCAT3, or equivalent molar
amounts of APLP2-CAT constructs containing various
5`-deletions of APLP2 promoter were adjusted to 2 µg with
empty vector DNA. DNA was incubated with 62.5 µmol of CaCl
and 1
BES-buffered saline (pH 6.97) at 25 °C for 20
min, and the mixture was added dropwise to each well. Cells were
incubated at 3% CO
for 16-18 h, after which time the
precipitate was removed by washing cells two times with culture medium.
The cells were subsequently returned to 5% CO
for
12-14 h, washed once with 1
phosphate-buffered saline and
scraped in 200 µl of 0.25 M Tris/HCl, pH 7.9.To assay
for CAT activity, 20 µg of cell lysate was incubated in the
presence of 1.1 mM acetyl CoA, 100 nCi of
[
C]chloramphenicol (60 mCi/mmol) in 0.22 M Tris/HCl, pH 7.7, at 37 °C for 45 min. Acetylated and
nonacetylated forms of chloramphenicol were extracted with 0.5 ml of
ethyl acetate and separated by ascending silica gel thin-layer
chromatography in chloroform:methanol (95:5) at room temperature.
Thin-layer chromatography sheets were then air-dried, and acetylated
and nonacetylated forms of chloramphenicol were quantified using a
PhosphorImager. The percentages of monoacetylated forms of
chloramphenicol were plotted for each construct and normalized to the
CAT activity of pRSVCAT. Each construct was tested in three separate
transfections, and standard error of the mean was determined.
For
transfections of mouse fibroblast Ltk
cells, cells
were plated at a density of 0.2
10
cells/well in a
6-well dish. Cells were transiently transfected with 4.26 µg of
pBLCAT3 or equivalent molar amounts of CAT plasmids containing various
5`-deletions of the APLP2 promoter adjusted to 7 µg with
empty vector DNA. 20 µg of cell lysate was used for CAT assays.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Recent studies have indicated that APP is a member of a
larger gene family that includes APLP1 and APLP2. The physiological
function(s) and regulation of the APP-related proteins is not well
understood. In this study, we mapped the genomic location of APLP2 and have analyzed the APLP2 promoter for the presence of
potential regulatory sequences that may be involved in transcriptional
activity of the APLP2 gene.
Chromosomal Localization of APLP2
The chromosomal
location of the mouse APLP2 gene was determined by
interspecific backcross analysis using progeny derived from matings of
((C57BL/6J
M. spretus)F
C57BL/6J)
mice. This interspecific backcross mapping panel has been typed for
over 1800 loci that are well distributed among all of the autosomes as
well as the X chromosome(19) . C57BL/6J and M. spretus DNAs were digested with several enzymes and analyzed by Southern
blot hybridization for informative restriction fragment length
polymorphisms using a mouse cDNA APLP2 probe. The 6.6-, 4.2-,
and 2.7-kb M. spretus restriction fragment length
polymorphisms (see ``Materials and Methods'') were used to
follow the segregation of the APLP2 locus in backcross mice.
The mapping results indicated that APLP2 is located in the
proximal region of mouse chromosome 9 linked to Ldlr, Penk, and Ets1. Although 152 mice were analyzed for
every marker and are shown in the segregation analysis (Fig. 1),
up to 185 mice were typed for some pairs of markers. Each locus was
analyzed in pairwise combinations for recombination frequencies using
the additional data. The ratios of the total number of mice exhibiting
recombinant chromosomes to the total number of mice analyzed for each
pair of loci and the most likely gene order are: centromere, Ldlr (3/162) Penk (13/185) APLP2 (5/158) Ets1. The recombination frequencies (expressed as genetic
distances in centimorgans ± the standard error) are as follows: Ldlr (1.9 ± 1.1) Penk (7.0 ± 1.9) APLP2 (3.2 ± 1.4) Ets1.
Figure 1:
APLP2 maps in the proximal
region of mouse chromosome 9. APLP2 was placed on mouse
chromosome 9 by interspecific backcross analysis. The segregation
patterns of APLP2 and flanking genes in 152 backcross animals
that were typed for all loci are shown at the top of the figure. For individual pairs of loci, more than 152 animals
were typed. Each column represents the chromosome identified
in the backcross progeny that was inherited from the (C57BL/6J
M. spretus)F
parent. The black boxes represent the presence of a C57BL/6J allele, and white boxes represent the presence of the M. spretus allele. The
number of offspring inheriting each type of chromosome is listed at the bottom of each column. A partial chromosome 9 linkage
map showing the location of APLP2 in relation to linked genes
is shown at the bottom of the figure. Recombination
distances between loci in centimorgans are shown to the left of the chromosome, and the positions of loci in human chromosomes
are shown to the right. References for the human map positions
of loci cited in this study can be obtained from the Genome Data Base,
a computerized database of human linkage information maintained by the
William H. Welch Medical Library of the Johns Hopkins University
(Baltimore, MD).
We have compared
our interspecific map of chromosome 9 with a composite mouse linkage
map that reports the map location of many uncloned mouse mutations
(provided from the Mouse Genome data base, a computerized data base
maintained at The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). APLP2 mapped in a region of the composite map that lacks mouse mutations
with a phenotype that might be expected for an alteration in this locus
(data not shown).
The proximal region of mouse chromosome 9 shares
regions of homology with human chromosomes 19p, 8q, and 11q (summarized
in Fig. 1). The recent assignment of APLP2 to 11q23-q25 (31) confirms and extends the synteny between mouse chromosome
9 and human 11q.
Transcription Initiation Site of Mouse APLP2 mRNA
RNA prepared from CHO cells and several mouse tissues
was subjected to S1 nuclease protection analysis using a
double-stranded DNA probe 5` end-labeled 40 bp downstream of the
translation start codon (Fig. 2A). Although the predominant
start site is located
89 bp upstream of the translation start
codon, there appeared to be variable levels of alternatively initiated
APLP2 transcripts in mRNA isolated from CHO cells or from mouse
thymus, heart, brain, liver, kidney, lung, testes, and spleen (Fig. 2B, lanes 1 and 2-9,
respectively). Primer extension analysis also revealed the presence of
multiple transcription start sites in mouse tissues (data not shown).
Multiple transcription start sites have been identified for human (14) and rat (15) APP mRNA, with the
predominant start sites located 146 and 156 bp upstream of the
translation start codons, respectively. However, the transcription
start site of mouse APP has not yet been reported.
Figure 2:
Mapping of the 5` termini of APLP2 mRNA. A, diagram of S1 nuclease protection assay. A
533-bp KpnI-HindIII restriction fragment from the
mouse APLP2 promoter was subcloned into Bluescript
KS
. The locations of restriction sites are with
respect to the translation start site (ATG). S1 nuclease probe was
prepared by
P end labeling at HindIII after
linearizing the clone with HindIII. B, S1 nuclease
protection assay of poly(A)
RNA from CHO cells (lane 1), of total RNA from mouse thymus, heart, brain, liver,
kidney, lung, testes, and spleen (lanes 2-9,
respectively). tRNA served as negative control (lane 10).
Marker (M) DNA fragments are in
bp.
Isolation of Genomic Sequences Containing the Mouse APLP2 Promoter
We screened
800,000 independent
phage-containing genomic DNA from a 129 SV embryonic stem cell library
with a 67-bp fragment of the 5`-untranslated region of APLP2 (position -64 to +3 with respect to the translation
start codon). We obtained two overlapping phage with the longest insert
containing 2.8 kb of sequence upstream of the translation start codon.
1.2 kb of this promoter region was sequenced (Fig. 3).
Figure 3:
DNA
sequence of the 5`-regulatory region of the mouse APLP2 gene.
Base numbers are relative to the predominant transcription start site,
89 bp upstream of the translation start site. Consensus sequences for
putative transcription factors are overlined, including the GC
element (GCE) and GC factors (GCF). Exon 1 (bold) is followed by 120 bp of intron
1.
The DNA sequence upstream of the predominant transcription start
site contains a CAAT box (-135 in antisense orientation) but
lacks a typical TATA box (Fig. 3). The promoter has a high GC
content, specifically between positions -1 and -300 (68%)
and -500 and -700 (69%). Multiple consensus sequences for
transcription factor binding sites are present in the entire region,
including one AP-1, two AP-2s, five GC boxes, one GC element, two GC
factors, and seven SP-1 sites. Similar putative transcription factor
binding sites are found in the APP promoter, however, at
different locations with respect to the transcription start
site(13, 14, 16, 17) . Furthermore,
the APP promoter contains sites for transcription factors not
present in the APLP2 promoter, including a potential heat
shock element and an overlapping AP-1/AP-4
site(14, 16, 18) , suggesting that the
transcriptional regulation of APLP2 and APP genes may
be dissimilar. The presence of multiple transcription start sites, the
absence of a typical TATA box, the high GC content, and the presence of
GC-rich boxes places the APLP2 promoter in the class of
promoters of housekeeping genes; these include the human, rat, and
mouse APP genes (13, 14, 16, 17) , the adenosine
deaminase gene(32) , the dihydrofolate reductase
gene(33) , and the hamster prion gene(34) .
Recently, the upstream AP-1 site (position -350 with respect
to the predominant transcription start site) in the APP promoter has been implicated in protein kinase C mediated
up-regulation of APP gene expression(35) . The AP-1
binding activity is thought to be composed of Jun-Jun homodimers.
Interleukin-1, nerve growth factor, and retinoic acid, agents known to
increase APP gene expression, have been shown to induce
c-jun and c-fos expression and cause transcriptional
activation of target genes through AP-1
sites(36, 37, 38, 39) . Furthermore,
interleukin-1 effects are thought to involve protein kinase C
activation(40) . It remains to be determined if APLP2 gene expression is also regulated by interleukin-1, nerve growth
factor, and retinoic acid, particularly in view of the presence of a
potential AP-1 site located at position -982.
99 bp of the Mouse APLP2 Promoter Is Sufficient to Direct
High Levels of CAT Expression in N2a and Ltk
Cells
To identify regulatory sequences responsible for the
expression of the mouse APLP2 gene, we constructed plasmids
containing progressive 5`-deletions of the APLP2 promoter
fused upstream of the bacterial reporter gene CAT, as diagrammed in Fig. 4B. Equimolar amounts of each construct were
transfected into mouse neuroblastoma (N2a) (Fig. 4C) and
mouse fibroblast (Ltk
) (Fig. 4D)
cells. RT-PCR analysis of cytoplasmic RNA from mouse N2a and mouse
Ltk
cells with degenerate primers which hybridize to
both APLP2 and APP mRNA revealed that these two cell
lines express moderate levels of endogenous APLP2 mRNA (Fig. 4A, lanes 1 and 2). Hence, we
concluded that these cell lines would be appropriate for analysis of
the APLP2 promoter.
Figure 4:
CAT assay
of APLP2 promoter in mouse N2a and Ltk
cells. A, EtBr-stained agarose gel of XhoI-digested RT-PCR products derived from mouse N2a (lane
1) and mouse Ltk
cells (lane 2).
Plasmids containing mouse APP and mouse APLP2 cDNA
were used as positive controls (lanes 3 and 4,
respectively). Marker (M) DNA fragments are in bp. B,
diagram of 5`-truncated APLP2 promoter constructs used for
transfection into mouse N2a and Ltk
cells (constructs
1-6). Sites of termination of these constructs are indicated with
respect to the predominant transcription start site. C, CAT
assays of APLP2 promoter constructs 1-6 in N2a cells.
CAT activity was determined as the percentage of monoacetylated forms
of chloramphenicol. CAT activity of the promoter construct containing
the long terminal repeat of the Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) was
assigned the activity of 100%, and the activities of the constructs
carrying 5`-deletions of the APLP2 promoter were expressed as
values relative to the Rous sarcoma virus construct. The vector
pBLCAT3, containing CAT in the absence of any promoter fragment, was
used as a negative control (BL). Each construct was tested in
three separate sets of transfections, and the standard error of the
mean is indicated by the error bars. D, CAT assays of APLP2 promoter constructs 1-6 in Ltk
cells; otherwise as in panel C above.
Progressive 5`-deletions from position
-971 to position -99, with respect to the predominant
transcription start site, had no significant effect on promoter
activity in either of the two cell lines tested. These findings suggest
that in N2a and Ltk
cells, 99 bp of the APLP2 promoter are sufficient for directing high levels of promoter
activity. Similarly, studies that analyzed progressive 5`-deletions of
the APP promoter from human, mouse, and rat have shown that
reporter gene expression levels remained fairly constant up to
approximately 100 bp upstream of the predominant transcription start
site(13, 15, 18) .
In summary, we have
localized APLP2 to the proximal region of mouse chromosome 9,
characterized
1.2 kb of the APLP2 promoter, and shown it
to contain features characteristic of promoters in the class of
housekeeping genes. We further showed that 99 bp upstream of the
predominant transcription start site are sufficient to direct high
levels of promoter activity.
Given the similarities in overall
structure of the APLP2 and APP promoters and the
minimal sequence requirements for transcription initiation, it is
highly likely that additional sequence elements distal to the regions
analyzed here are responsible for differential expression of APLP2/APP in specific neuronal populations or systemic organs (i.e. liver). Further studies will be directed toward using
transgenic strategies with larger genomic fragments to clarify these
issues with the eventual goal of identifying transcription factors
responsible for mediating basal level of APLP2 gene
expression.
FOOTNOTES
- *
- This work was supported by
grants from the United States Public Health Service (National
Institutes of Health Grant AG 05146) (to S. S. S.), the Adler
Foundation (to S. S. S.), the Alzheimer's Association (to S. S.
S.), and the NCI (to N. G. C. and N. A. J.), DHHS, National Institutes
of Health, under contract NO1-CO-46000 with ABL. The costs of
publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of
page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked
``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
- ¶
- To whom correspondence should be addressed: The
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Neuropathology Laboratory,
558 Ross Research Bldg., 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD 21205-2196.
Tel.: 410-955-5632; Fax: 410-955-9777.
- (
) - The
abbreviations used are: APP, amyloid precursor protein; AP-1 and AP-2,
activator protein 1 and 2, respectively; APLP, amyloid precursor-like
protein; bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase(s); CAT, chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase; Ets1, E26 avian leukemia oncogene; Ldlr, low density lipoprotein receptor; Penk,
preproenkephalin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RT-PCR, reverse
transcriptase-PCR; SP-1, promoter-specific transcription factor; CHO,
Chinese hamster ovary; PIPES,
piperazine-N,N`-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid); BES, N,N-bis[2-hydroxyethyl]-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Dave Bol for providing the 129 SV embryonic
stem cell genomic library and Mary Barnstead for excellent technical
assistance.
REFERENCES
- Glenner, G. G., and Wong, C. W. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 120, 885-890
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Masters, C. L., Multhaup, G., Simms, G., Pottgieser, J., Martins, R. N., and Beyreuther, K. (1985) EMBO J. 4, 2757-2763
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wasco, W., Bupp, K., Magendantz, M., Gusella, J. F., Tanzi, R. E., and Solomon, F. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 10758-10762
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hanes, J., von der Kammer, H., Kristjansson, G. I., and Scheit, K. H. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1216, 154-156
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Slunt, H. H., Thinakaran, G., von Koch, C., Lo, A. C. Y., Tanzi, R. E., and Sisodia, S. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2637-2644
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sandbrink, R., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1994a) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1219, 167-170
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Wasco, W., Gurubhagavatula, S., Paradis, M. D., Romano, D. M., Sisodia, S. S., Hyman, B, T., Neve, R. L., and Tanzi, R. E. (1993) Nat. Genet. 5, 95-100
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sprecher, C. A., Grant, F. J., Grimm, G., O'Hara, P. J., Norris, F., Norris, K., and Foster, D. C. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 4481-4486
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sandbrink, R., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1994b) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 14227-14234
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sandbrink, R., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1994c) Neurobiol. Dis. 1, 13-24
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lorent, K., Overbergh, L., Moechars, D., deStrooper, B., van Leuven, F., and van den Berghe, H. (1995) Neuroscience 65, 1009-1025
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Thinakaran, G., Roskams, A. J. I., Kitt, C. A., Slunt, H. H., Masliah, E., von Koch, C., Ginsberg, S. D., Ronnett, G. V., Reed, R. R., Price, D. L., and Sisodia, S. S. (1995) J. Neurosci. , in press
- Izumi, R., Yamada, T., Yoshikai, S., Sasaki, H., Hattori, M., and Sakaki, Y. (1992) Gene (Amst.) 112, 189-195
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Salbaum, J. M., Weidemann, A., Lemaire, H. G., Masters, C. L., and Beyreuther, K. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 2807-2813
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hoffman, P. W., and Chernak, J. M. (1994) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 201, 610-617
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- La Fauci, G., Lahiri, D. K., Salton, S. R. J., and Robakis, N. K. (1989) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 159, 297-304
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Chernak, J. M. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 133, 255-260
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Quitschke, W. W., and Goldgaber, D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17362-17368
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Copeland, N. G., and Jenkins, N. A. (1991) Trends Genet. 7, 113-118
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Jenkins, N. A., Copeland, N. G., Taylor, B. A., and Lee, B. K. (1982) J. Virol. 43, 26-36
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wilkie, T. M., Chen, Y., Gilbert, D. J., Moore, K. J., Yu, L., Simon, M. I., Copeland, N. G., and Jenkins, N. A. (1993) Genomics 18, 175-184
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Green, E. L. (1981) Genetics and Probability in Animal Breeding Experiments , pp. 77-113, Oxford University Press, New York
- Chirgwin, J. M., Przybyla, A. E., MacDonald, R. J., and Rutter, W. J. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 5294-5299
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Aviv, H., and Leder, P. (1972) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 69, 1408-1412
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sisodia, S. S., Sollner-Webb, B., and Cleveland, D. W. (1987) Mol. Cell Biol. 7, 3602-3612
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Manninen, I., and Schulman, A. H. (1993) BioTechniques 14, 174
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Luckow, B., and Schuetz, G. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 5490
[Free Full Text]
- Gorman, C. M., Moffat, L., and Howard, B. (1982a) Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 1044-1051
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gorman, C. M., Merlino, G. T., Willingham, M. C., Pastan, I., and Howard, B. H. (1982b) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 79, 6777-6781
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Chen, C., and Okayama, H. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 2745-2752
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- von der Kammer, H., Loeffler, C., Hanes, J., Klaudiny, J., Scheit, K. H., and Hansmann, I. (1994) Genomics 10, 308-311
- Valerio, D., Duyvesteyn, M. G. C., Dekker, B. M. M., Weeda, G., Berkvens, T. M., van der Voorn, L., van Ormondt, G., and van der Eb, A. J. (1985) EMBO J. 4, 437-443
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Crouse, G. F., Simonsen, C. C., McEwan, R. N., and Schimke, R. T. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 7887-7897
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Basler, K., Oesch, B., Scott, M., Westaway, D., Walchli, M., Groth, D. F., McKinley, M. P., Prusiner, S. B., and Weissmann, C. (1986) Cell 46, 417-428
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Trejo, J., Massamiri, T., Deng, T., Dewji, N. N., Bayney, R. M., and Heller Brown, J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 21682-21690
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gizang-Ginsberg, E., and Ziff, E. B. (1990) Genes & Dev. 4, 477-491
- Muegge, K., Williams, T. M., Kant, J., Karin, M., Chiu, R., Schmidt, A., Siebenlist, U., Young, H. A., and Durum, S. K. (1989) Science 246, 249-251
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bartel, D. P., Sheng, M., Lau, L. F., and Greenberg, M. E. (1989) Genes & Dev. 3, 304-313
- Yang-Yen, H., Chiu, R., and Karin, M. (1990) New Biol. 2, 351-361
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Goldgaber, D., Harris, H. W., Hla, T., Maciag, T., Donnelly, R. J., Jacobsen, J. S., Vitek, M. P., and Gajdusek, D. C. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 7606-7610
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.