|
Volume 270,
Number 49,
Issue of December 8, 1995 pp. 29594-29600
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
The Plasmacytoma
Growth Inhibitor Restrictin-P Is an Antagonist of Interleukin 6 and
Interleukin 11
IDENTIFICATION AS A STROMA-DERIVED ACTIVIN A (*)
(Received for publication, August 25, 1995; and in revised form, September 27, 1995)
Naama
Brosh
(1),
Dalia
Sternberg
(1),
Judy
Honigwachs-Sha'anani
(1),
Byeong-Chel
Lee
(1),
Yaron
Shav-Tal
(1),
Esther
Tzehoval
(1),
Lester
M.
Shulman
(3),
Jeky
Toledo
(1),
Yael
Hacham
(2),
Pnina
Carmi
(1),
Wen
Jiang
(1),
Jurgen
Sasse
(4),
Friedemann
Horn
(4),
Yigal
Burstein
(2),
Dov
Zipori
(1)(§)From the
(1)Departments of Cell Biology and
(2)Organic Chemistry, the Weizmann Institute of
Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel,
(3)Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer 52621, Israel,
and the
(4)Institute for Biochemistry, RWTH Aachen D-52057,
Federal Republic of Germany
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
A stromal protein, designated restrictin-P, that specifically
kills plasma-like cells was purified to homogeneity and shown to be
identical with activin A. The specificity to plasma-like cells stemmed
from the ability of restrictin-P/activin A to competitively antagonize
the proliferation-inducing effects of interleukin (IL) 6 and IL-11.
Restrictin-P further interfered with the IL-6-induced secretion of
acute phase proteins by HepG2 human hepatoma cells and with the
IL-6-mediated differentiation of M1 myeloblasts. A competition binding
assay indicated that restrictin-P did not interfere with the binding of
IL-6 to its receptor on plasma-like cells, suggesting that it may act
by intervening in the signal transduction pathway of the growth factor.
Indeed, concomitant addition of restrictin-P and IL-6 to
cytokine-deprived B9 hybridoma cells was followed by sustained
overexpression of junB gene until cell death occurred, while
IL-6 alone caused a transient increase only. This altered response to
IL-6 stimulation was accompanied by a moderate increase in STAT protein
activation. Thus, in this study, we identified the plasmacytoma growth
inhibitor, restrictin-P, as being activin A of stromal origin. It is
shown that activin A is an antagonist of IL-6-induced functions and
that it modifies the IL-6 signaling pattern.
INTRODUCTION
Regulation of hemopoiesis is mediated by cytokines that act
through distinct mechanisms. Some, like colony-stimulating factors
(CSFs) ( )promote accumulation of hemopoietic cells by
inducing proliferation coupled with differentiation(1) .
Others, like tumor necrosis factor, may cause cell cycle arrest and
thus limit cell accumulation(2) . The outcome of the
interaction between the growth factor and the cell often depends on the
nature of the target cell; as it is with transforming growth factor
(TGF)- , the same cytokine may be stimulatory to one cell type and
inhibitory to the other (reviewed in (3) ). Whereas some
inhibitors operate by slowing down cell growth (4) or by
induction of terminal differentiation(5) , others cause cell
death (6) by inducing apoptosis (7, 8, 9, 10) . Restrictin-P has
formerly been described as an inhibitor of plasmacytoma cell
growth(11, 12) . The biological activity of this
factor was first noticed through the selective ability of primary
stromal cells to slow down the proliferation of plasmacytoma
cells(13, 14) . A similar function was exhibited by
trypsin-released proteins obtained by mild treatment of a bone
marrow-derived stromal cell line of mouse origin
(MBA-2.1)(12) . The released crude protein mixture inhibited
the growth of a series of plasmacytomas and hybridomas but did not have
significant effects on the growth of a variety of other leukemia cell
lines of lymphoid, erythroid, and myeloid origin(12) .
Similarly, no effect was observed on normal cell populations such as
bone marrow cells responding to colony-stimulating factors or spleen
cells induced by mitogens(12) . This unique specificity
prompted us to isolate the active component. However, factor(s)
mediating the growth inhibition were found to be produced by the stroma
cell line in minuscule amounts, and it was necessary to establish
conditions for large scale production of the factor. We found that the
producer cell line MBA-2.1 could be propagated on a three-dimensional
carrier of nonwoven fabric of polyester loaded in a bioreactor system
under complete protein-free conditions(15) . The study of such
bioreactors showed that the cells could be maintained under
protein-free conditions for up to 10 months while producing
restrictin-P activity along with TGF- , macrophage (M)-CSF, and
IL-6. Restrictin-P obtained from the bioreactor system induced in its
target cells early G /G arrest, morphological
changes, and signs of cell damage characteristic of
apoptosis(11, 16) accompanied by intracellular ionic
changes(17) . The present study was aimed at identifying
restrictin-P by purifying it to homogeneity and at analyzing the
mechanism by which restrictin-P exerts its specific inhibitory effect
on plasma-like cells.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell CulturesThe MBA-2.1 stromal cell line (18, 19) was grown in 100-mm plates (Falcon, Oxnard,
CA) and maintained by weekly passage in growth medium composed of
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Life Technologies,
Inc.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS)
(Biolabs, Jerusalem, Israel). 14M1.4 macrophages (18) were
grown in the above-mentioned medium, with the addition of L-cell or
MBA-2.1-conditioned medium as sources of M-CSF. MPC-11(20) ,
SP-2, NSO, X-24, X-63, and P3.1 (21) plasmacytoma cell lines
were grown in Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) 1640 (Life
Technologies, Inc.) with 10% FCS. ABLS-8 (22) and AVRij-1 (23) pre-B lymphoma cells and the T lymphomas
BW-5147(24) , the myeloid tumor cell line
WEHI-265.1(25) , the F4N Friend erythroleukemia cell line, and
the Pu-5-1R macrophage cell line (26) were all grown in
RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS and 50 µM -mercaptoethanol. B9
B cell hybridoma cells (27) were grown in RPMI 1640
supplemented with 10% FCS, 50 µM -mercaptoethanol,
and 10 IU/ml human recombinant IL-6. M1 clone 11 of mouse
myelomonocytic cells was grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10%
FCS(28, 29) . NFS-60.4 cells are a clone selected to
grow in response to granulocyte macrophage (GM)-CSF and were propagated
with yeast recombinant GM-CSF. MC/9 cells are IL-3-dependent and were
maintained in a medium conditioned by D9-high T-cells that produce IL-3
and IL-4 (the latter and recombinant GM-CSF were provided by Dr. F.
Lee, DNAX). HepG2 hepatoma cells were grown in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 8% FCS. All cell lines
were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 10% CO in air except for B9 cells which were incubated in 5% CO in air.
Cytokine Biological AssaysRestrictin-P was
monitored using either MPC-11 plasmacytoma or B9 hybridoma cells.
MPC-11 cells were seeded at 8 10 cells/ml in
96-well microtiter plates (100 µl/well) (Costar, Cambridge, MA) in
RPMI supplemented with 7.5% FCS in the presence of serial dilutions of
the restrictin-P-containing samples or buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 7.8, or 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.8). Cell viability was determined
following 4 days of incubation using the
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT)
colorimetric assay, which measures cell viability via mitochondrial
activity(30) . One unit of activity was designated as the
amount of protein which, under the above conditions, caused 50% growth
inhibition relative to the control. The assay was essentially the same
using B9 cells except that the culture conditions were as indicated
above for the B9 hybridoma. The latter was also used to titrate IL-6
levels. Briefly, B9 cells (5 10 cells) were
cultured in 96-well plates (200 µl/well) in the presence of test
samples and recombinant human IL-6 controls. At 64 h of incubation, the
cells were pulsed with [ H]thymidine (Rotem
Industries, Israel, 1 µCi/well) for 16 h. Unit IL-6 was determined
by relating to IL-6 1st international standard (code 89/548). The
biological effect of IL-6 was monitored in two additional assays. HepG2
cells were seeded at 10 /ml in 24-well plates (Costar,
Cambridge, MA), washed twice in modified Eagle's medium, and
incubated with IL-6, at the concentrations indicated. The acute phase
proteins -acid glycoprotein and haptoglobin were monitored in the
conditioned medium by Western blotting using corresponding polyclonal
antibodies (Sigma, Israel). The ECL Western blotting kit (Amersham
International plc, United Kingdom) was used according to the
recommended instructions. M1 myeloid leukemia cells were seeded at 2
10 /ml in microtiter plates (100 µl/well) and
were induced to differentiate with the indicated concentration of IL-6.
Mitochondrial activity was assayed by MTT as above.
Cytokines and Corresponding Neutralizing
AntibodiesThe antibodies to TGF- that were used were
rabbit anti-native porcine platelet TGF- 1, neutralizing for both
TGF- 1 and TGF- 2. These antibodies were purchased from British
Biotechnology Ltd. (Abingdon, Oxon, UK). Human TGF- 1 was obtained
from the same source. Hamster anti-murine interferon antibodies
were obtained from Genzyme Corp. IL-3 was purchased from Peprotec
(Rocky Hill, NJ). Recombinant human and monoclonal rat anti-mouse IL-6
neutralizing antibodies were purchased from Genzyme Corp. Recombinant,
N-terminally truncated, human IL-6 (mutein) (31) and basic
fibroblast growth factor were kindly provided by Pharmacia Biocenter
(Nerviano, Italy). Crude concentrated murine IL-6 was kindly provided
by Dr. J. Lotem, Weizmann Institute, and murine IL-6 was obtained from
Dr. J. Van Snick, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Brussels. Goat
anti-M-CSF neutralizing antiserum was kindly provided by Dr. R. E.
Stanley from the Albert Einstein University. Recombinant mouse
IL-1 , IL-2, IL-4, and IL-7 and recombinant human IL-10, IL-11, and
platelet-derived growth factor were purchased from Genzyme Corp. Human
G-CSF was kindly provided by Dr. S. Gillis of Immunex Corp., Seattle.
Recombinant bovine activin A was purchased from Innogenetics (Belgium).
IL-6 Competition Binding on B9 CellsIL-6 labeling
and competition binding were performed as described
previously(32) . The amount of r-murine
(Mu)- I-IL-6 or r-human (Hu)- I-IL-6 used was
30-40% of the amount that gave saturation binding. Under these
conditions, there were 2,070 ± 530 high affinity binding sites
and the Mu-IL-6 and Hu-IL-6 bound with apparent K values of 5.5 10 and 1.1
10 M, respectively, as determined by the
LIGAND program(33) .
Protein PurificationCrude restrictin-P, 3.2 g of
protein (2.5 10 units in 1.4 liters) was prepared
as previously reported(15) . Aliquots (200 mg of protein) were
further purified by ion exchange chromatography on Q-Sepharose, using a
fast protein liquid chromotography (FPLC) system. After loading the
sample and appropriate washing in buffer A (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH
7.8), restrictin-P was eluted with 0.05 M NaCl in buffer A.
Elution of proteins was followed at 280 nm. The salt-eluted material
was desalted and concentrated using reversed phase high performance
liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) on an Aquapore RP-300 column. Proteins
were eluted with a nonlinear gradient of aqueous acetonitrile,
5-80%, in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Elution of proteins was
followed at 214 nm, protein content was determined according to
Bradford (Bio-Rad, Munich), and restrictin-P content was assayed as
described above. Fractions with restrictin-P activity (kept at
-20 °C) were further purified on Superdex 75 (in batches of
about 10 mg of protein each) in 2 phosphate-buffered saline.
Elution pattern was followed at 280 nm. Final purification of
restrictin-P was achieved by RP-HPLC on RP-300 using a multistep linear
gradient of aqueous acetonitrile in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Elution
of proteins was followed at 214 nm. Biologically active fractions were
pooled and rechromatographed (RP-HPLC) under essentially identical
conditions. Fractions containing restrictin-P (eluted at 38%
acetonitrile) were vacuum-dried and kept frozen at -20 °C.
Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) analyses of different protein
fractions were performed using a Mini-Protean II gel apparatus (Bio-Rad
Laboratories). Silver staining was performed with a Quick-Silver kit
(Amersham) or a Silver Stain Plus Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Coomassie
Brilliant Blue staining was performed using the Serva blue G stain.
Sequencing of the purified protein was performed at Perkin-Elmer.
Northern AnalysisThe junB probe used,
RSVjunB, was a 1.2-kilobase XhoI-SmaI fragment cloned
into the pUC-18 vector(34) . DNA probes labeled with a Random
Primed DNA Labeling Kit (Boehringer Mannheim) were passed over a
Sephadex G-50 minispin column. A minimum of 10 cpm/ml was
used for hybridization. Signal intensities were measured by a 300A
computing densitometer (Molecular Dynamics, Tampa, FL).
Gel Retardation AssayHepG2 cells were treated
with IL-6 and/or restrictin-P, and nuclei were isolated and extracted.
Gel retardation analysis was carried out as described previously (35) except that 50 mM Tris, 41.5 mM boric
acid, 0.5 mM EDTA, pH 8.3 was used as electrophoresis buffer.
A DNA oligonucleotide containing mutant 67 of c-fos promoter sis-induced element (36) was labeled with P by filling in with Klenow and used as a probe.
RESULTS
The inhibitory activity of restrictin-P, as detected in
conditioned media form MBA-2.1 cells, was specific to plasma-like tumor
cell lines (Table 1). A variety of other cell lines representing
different hemopoietic lineages and stages of maturation were only
slightly inhibited or were totally unaffected by this factor. To rule
out the possibility that restrictin-P activity could be ascribed to one
of the cytokines known to affect hemopoietic cells, we searched for
factors that might have restrictin-P-like activity. IL-1, IL-2, IL-3,
IL-4, IL-6, IL-7, IL-10, IL-11, M-CSF, G-CSF,
TGF- ,platelet-derived growth factor, bovine fibroblast growth
factor, interferon , and leukemia inhibitory factor were tested
over a range of concentrations. These cytokines were found to be devoid
of the ability to inhibit the growth of the MPC-11 plasmacytoma which
is highly sensitive to restrictin-P(12) . In addition,
neutralizing antibodies to TGF- 1 and -2, tumor necrosis factor,
IL-6, interferon , and M-CSF did not reduce restrictin-P-like
activity in media conditioned by MBA-2.1 cells (results not shown).
We used the above-conditioned media in an attempt to obtain some
clue as to the mechanism by which the inhibition of plasma-like cells
is mediated. The MBA-2.1 cell-conditioned medium inhibited the growth
of the MPC-11 plasmacytoma and, as detailed below, it also interfered
with the growth-promoting effect of IL-6 on B9 cells. To determine
whether these two functions were mediated by the same molecule, it was
necessary to purify restrictin-P to homogeneity. We therefore
constructed a bioreactor production system wherein restrictin-P
activity could be observed in media conditioned by the cells in
absolute protein-free conditions(15) . A batch of 600 liters of
conditioned medium was concentrated by diafiltration and subjected to a
further step of concentration by Amicon ultrafiltration followed by
fractionation using an automated FPLC column. The fractionation
included anion exchange chromatography, gel filtration, and, finally,
two steps of purification to homogeneity by reverse phase HPLC. Fig. 1summarizes the above purification steps. As can be seen,
the last stage yielded a single peak of protein that coincided with the
biological activity of restrictin-P, i.e. the capacity to
inhibit the growth of the plasmacytoma cell line, MPC-11. PAGE analysis
of this product, under reducing conditions, revealed a single protein
band at 15 kDa (Fig. 2A). This purified peptide was
N-terminally sequenced, and the first 36 residues were
indistinguishable from those of the precursor of the A subunit of
inhibin which gives rise to a 15-kDa polypeptide (37, 38, 39) (Fig. 2B). The
dimer of this subunit is known as activin A. Fig. 3A shows a
comparison between restrictin-P and recombinant activin A of bovine
origin. It is clear that these factors have an equal ability to
suppress the growth of MPC-11 cells. Considered together, these results
suggest that restrictin-P is identical with activin A.
Figure 1:
Purification
of restrictin-P from stromal cell conditioned medium. A,
Q-Sepharose anion exchange chromatography. Processed conditioned medium
of MBA-2.1 cell line (1.5 10 units) was loaded on a
Q-Sepharose column (100 ml, XK 50). The column was washed with 1200 ml
of the initial buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.8, 8 ml/min), and
restrictin-P was eluted with 400 ml of 0.05 M NaCl in the
initial buffer. B, Superdex 75 gel filtration. Fractions
containing restrictin-P from the Q-Sepharose column were concentrated,
dissolved in 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.8), and loaded onto a Superdex
75 column (20/60, Pharmacia). The column was washed with 2
phosphate-buffered saline (2 ml/min). C, C-8 reversed-phase
HPLC-I. Biologically active fractions from the Superdex 75 column were
loaded onto an Aquapore RP-300 column (7 µm, 4.6 100 mm
+ 4.6 30 mm precolumn). The adsorbed proteins were eluted
from the column with a multistep gradient of aqueous acetonitrile in
0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (0.5 ml/min). D, C-8 reversed-phase
HPLC-II. Partially purified restrictin-P was rechromatographed
(RP-HPLC) under essentially identical conditions as in C above, except for an additional isocratic step at the elution time
of the protein peak (at approximately 36% acetonitrile). Broken
lines indicate the absorption at 280 nm (A and B) or 214 nm (C and D); open circles and lines show the biological activity of restrictin-P as
measured by the MPC-11 assay, and lines indicate percentage of
acetonitrile (C and D).
Figure 2:
A, SDS-PAGE analysis of highly purified
restrictin-P. An aliquot from the active fraction (RP-HPLC-II, Fig. 1D) was loaded on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel under
reducing conditions (lane 1). Protein bands were viewed by
silver staining. Molecular mass markers, shown on the right-hand
side, are: carbonic anhydrase, 31 kDa; soybean trypsin inhibitor,
21.5 kDa; lysozyme, 14.4 kDa; and aprotinin, 6.5 kDa. B, N
terminus amino acid sequence of purified restrictin-P compared to the
known sequence of activin A monomer.
Figure 3:
A, inhibition of MPC-11 plasmacytoma cell
growth by purified restrictin-P and by recombinant activin A. Cells (4
10 /well) were seeded in 96-well Falcon microtiter
plates, in 100 µl of RPMI containing 10% FCS with serial dilutions
of restrictin-P ( ), activin A ( ), or control growth medium
( ). Cells were incubated for 4 days, and their viability was
estimated by the MTT assay. The bar lines represent the mean
of duplicate determinations ± S.D. B, lack of effect of
restrictin-P on MC/9 ( ), 14M1.1 ( ), and NFS ( )
cell lines dependent for growth on IL-3, M-CSF, and GM-CSF,
respectively. Cells were seeded at 5 10 ,
10 , and 2.5 10 /well, respectively, with
the indicated amount of restrictin-P and specific growth factor, and
their viability was monitored as in A.
To study the
mechanism by which restrictin-P/stromal activin A inhibits plasma-like
cell growth, we examined whether its effect was mediated by reversible
cytostasis or through a mechanism that involves cell destruction.
Restrictin-P in its unpurified form appeared to induce ionic changes
that are associated with apoptosis(16) . This mode of cell
death is known to occur in hemopoietic cells deprived of their specific
growth factor. The B9 hybridoma is dependent for growth on IL-6 and was
therefore used to examine the possibility that restrictin-P causes
growth cessation by interfering with the action of the growth factor.
Extensive proliferation of B9 cells was induced by 0.1 IU/well of IL-6,
and only moderate growth stimulation is observed upon addition of
increasing concentrations of the purified cytokine. Addition of
restrictin-P to B9 cell cultures stimulated by 0.01-0.1 IU/well
of IL-6 caused almost complete growth inhibition. This inhibitory
effect was gradually reduced with increasing the concentration of IL-6
and was almost abolished at 200 IU/ml of IL-6 (Fig. 4A). In contrast to the ability of restrictin-P
to antagonize the growth-stimulating effect of IL-6 it had no effect on
the growth of 14M1.1, NFS, and MC/9 cells which are dependent for
growth on M-CSF, GM-CSF, and IL-3, respectively (Fig. 3B).
Figure 4:
Restrictin-P antagonizes IL-6- and
IL-11-induced proliferation of B9 cells. Growth factor-deprived B9
cells were washed (3 times) with growth medium (RPMI + 5% FCS) and
were seeded in 96-microtiter well plates (5 10 cells/200 µl/well) in growth medium supplemented with the
indicated dilutions of recombinant human IL-6 (A, open
symbols) or with the same IL-6 dilutions and 1.5 units/well of
purified restrictin-P (A, closed symbols). A similar
experiment was set with serial dilutions of recombinant human IL-11 (B, open symbols) or with IL-11 and 0.018 unit/well
of restrictin-P (B, closed symbols). Cells were
incubated for 48 h and then pulsed with
[ H]thymidine (1 µCi/well) for 12 h. Values
represent the mean of triplicate determinations ±
S.D.
IL-11 is an additional stimulator of
plasma-like cells(40) . As shown in Fig. 4B,
restrictin-P inhibited the growth of IL-11-stimulated B9 cells, and
this inhibition was competed out by increasing the titer of IL-11.
Thus, restrictin-P counteracted the growth-stimulating effect of both
IL-6 and IL-11, and these cytokines at high titers overcame the effect
of restrictin-P. Plasmacytomas are but one target cell type that
responds to IL-6 signaling. The HepG2 hepatoma release acute phase
proteins under the influence of IL-6(41) . As shown in Fig. 5, the secretion of both -acid glycoprotein and
haptoglobin induced in HepG2 cells by IL-6 was markedly reduced by
addition of restrictin-P (Fig. 5). M1 (clone 11) myeloblastic
cells differentiate into adherent monocytes under the influence of
IL-6(28, 29) . Following IL-6 induction, M1 cells
exhibit high mitochondrial activity and growth inhibition. As shown in Table 2, restrictin-P abolished the IL-6-induced effect.
Figure 5:
Restrictin-P interferes with the
IL-6-induced secretion of the acute phase proteins -acid
glycoprotein (AGP) and haptoglobin (HP). HepG2
hepatoma cells were grown to confluence and stimulated with 100
units/ml IL-6 or an equal amount of IL-6 with 312 units/ml restrictin-P (RP). Conditioned media were collected at 24 h, subjected to
PAGE (25 µl/well, 10% and 7% gels for AGP and HP, respectively) and
were tested by Western blotting for the acute phase proteins using the
corresponding antibodies.
It
was concluded, therefore, that IL-6 and restrictin-P are competing on
some target machinery used to generate a signaling pathway in at least
3 completely different target cell types. A candidate target molecule
for restrictin-P action was the IL-6 receptor complex. We studied the
possibility that restrictin-P is a receptor antagonist by testing its
ability to compete with radiolabeled IL-6 for binding to its receptor
on the surface of B9 cells. Fig. 6shows that ``cold''
IL-6 competed out the binding of radiolabeled IL-6 to its receptor as
expected. On the other hand, restrictin-P, at a concentration that
would completely abolish the growth-stimulating effect of IL-6, failed
to reduce the binding of radiolabeled IL-6 to its receptor. Thus,
restrictin-P does not seem to interfere with ligand binding and may
therefore interfere with postreceptor event(s) within the IL-6
signaling pathway. B9 cells stimulated by IL-6 following a period of
cytokine deprivation showed a transient increase in expression of the
early response gene junB (Fig. 7). Restrictin-P added
to such cells caused increased and sustained expression of the junB gene until 24 h post-treatment at the time cell death already
occurs. A similar augmented expression of junB mRNA was
observed in the MPC-11 cell line. The expression of another early
response gene TIS11 was increased in B9 cells incubated with
restrictin-P but was unaffected in MPC-11 cells. The effect of
restrictin-P on junB expression was also observed in HepG2
hepatoma cells (not shown). In these cells, restrictin-P did not
interfere with the JAK/STAT pathway (42) (Fig. 8). The
data further suggest that restrictin-P moderately increased STAT
activation (Fig. 8). This is surprising in view of the fact that
restrictin-P abrogated the IL-6-induced secretion of acute phase
proteins by HepG2 hepatoma (Fig. 5). It is implied therefore
that a separate, possibly unknown pathway exists which allows
cross-talk between the restrictin-P and IL-6 signaling cascades.
Figure 6:
Restrictin-P does not interfere with the
binding of IL-6 to B9 cells. B9 cells were weaned from IL-6 in the
growth medium 24 h before binding assay. A, specific high
affinity binding of a constant amount of r-Mu- I-IL-6
competed with varying amounts of crude concentrated mouse IL-6 ( )
or partially purified restrictin-P ( ). Mean total r-Mu-IL-6 bound
was 1120 ± 48 cpm. B, specific high affinity binding of
a constant amount of r-Hu- I-IL-6 mutein ( ) or
purified restrictin-P ( ). The mean total r-Hu-IL-6 binding was
2350 ± 68 cpm which was competed to 123 ± 30 with a
200-fold excess of crude concentrated murine IL-6. Results of the
competition binding studies are plotted as a function of fold excess
where 1 unit of restrictin-P inhibits 1 unit of IL-6 by 50% on B9
cells. Error bars indicate standard deviation of
replicates.
Figure 7:
Restrictin-P causes augmented expression
of junB mRNA in plasma-like cells. The IL-6-dependent B9 cells
were incubated overnight without IL-6 and were then induced by 2
units/ml of this cytokine for 20 min before addition of restrictin-P (RP) (200 units/ml) or 10 mM Tris-HCl (0 min) (A). MPC-11 plasmacytoma cells were seeded with or without
IL-6 and with restrictin-P as above (B). Following the time
point indicated, RNA was extracted and examined by Northern blotting
for junB and TIS11 transcripts.
Figure 8:
Effect of restrictin-P on STAT activation.
HepG2 cells were incubated with human recombinant IL-6 (10 units/ml)
and restrictin-P as indicated. Either IL-6 and restrictin-P were added
simultaneously or restrictin-P was added 30 min or 16 h prior to IL-6.
15 min after addition of IL-6 to the medium, the cells were harvested
and nuclear extracts were prepared. 10 µg of protein was then
analyzed in a gel retardation assay using a P-labeled
oligonucleotide probe that contained a high affinity mutant of the
c-fos promoter sis-induced element (SIE). The
positions of DNA-protein complexes containing either Stat3 and
Stat1 homodimers or Stat3/Stat1 heterodimers are
indicated.
DISCUSSION
We investigated the nature of the activity, designated as
restrictin-P(11) , found in media conditioned by stromal
cells(12) , which causes growth arrest and subsequent cell
death of mouse plasmacytomas and hybridomas. This activity was mediated
by a protein that was purified to homogeneity from medium conditioned
by the stromal cell line MBA-2.1 and was found to have an N-terminal
amino acid sequence indistinguishable from that of activin A (37, 38, 39) which is also known as
follicle-stimulating hormone releasing protein or erythroid
differentiation
factor(39, 43, 44, 45, 46) .
Activin A was found to be expressed by stromal cells(47) . The
molecular mass of monomeric restrictin-P, as deduced from PAGE, was 15
kDa, a size similar to that of monomeric activin A ( A-inhibin).
Like activin A, restrictin-P is a dimer of 25 kDa under nonreducing
conditions and loses its biological activity upon reduction (not
shown). Furthermore, recombinant activin A was inhibitory to the MPC-11
plasmacytoma to the same extent as was restrictin-P. It is therefore
concluded that these two molecules are identical. Restrictin-P in
its purified form killed the factor-dependent hybridoma cell line B9 by
competing with externally added IL-6 or IL-11. On the basis of the
inability of a 270-fold excess of partially purified restrictin-P to
compete with r-Mu- I-IL-6 binding (Fig. 6A) or a 340-fold excess of highly purified
restrictin-P to compete with r-Hu- I-IL-6 (mutein) (Fig. 6B) binding, it is concluded that restrictin-P
does not exert its effect by competing with IL-6 for high affinity IL-6
ligand binding sites. The antagonistic effect of restrictin-P is
specific to IL-6 and IL-11 since restrictin-P did not affect the growth
of other cytokine-dependent cell lines such as 14M1.4 macrophages that
depend on M-CSF for growth, MC/9 mastocytoma which are IL-3-dependent
or NFS-60, GM-CSF-dependent cells (Fig. 3B). The
strict specificity of killing by restrictin-P of plasmacytomas and
hybridomas suggested that the factor detects some molecular machinery
characteristic to this cell type. The growth dependence on IL-6 is
common to many plasmacytomas and hybridomas. We show here that
restrictin-P inhibits the growth of B9 cells by competing with the
growth factors obligatory for the survival of the hybridoma. However,
some cells, like the MPC-11 clone, are cytokine-independent, but are
nonetheless growth-inhibited by restrictin-P. The question raised is
whether the mechanism of action of restrictin-P in the case of
IL-6-dependent B9 cells is different from that in MPC-11 cells. An
alternative possibility is that the restrictin-P/activin A receptor (48) transduces a signal that interferes with IL-6 signaling
downstream in the pathway. It has been shown that human myelomas
possess intracellular IL-6 and IL-6 receptor, and their growth is
triggered by an internal autocrine loop(49) . Restrictin-P may
interfere with such a hypothetical internal loop in the MPC-11 cell.
One piece of evidence seems to support this notion, i.e. the
increased junB expression induced in both B9 and in MPC-11
cells by restrictin-P. We further utilized the HepG2 cells in an
attempt to identify a possible interference of restrictin-P in the
JAK/STAT pathways involved in IL-6 signaling(42) . Restrictin-P
did not have such an effect, and we further noted an increase in STAT
activation. IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine that affects cells in
different tissues and
organs(50, 51, 52, 53, 54) .
It is therefore expected that the activity of IL-6 would be tightly
regulated. This may occur on the level of expression of the IL-6 gene
as a result of activity of other cytokines or a variety of
mediators(55, 56, 57) . A more refined
control involves interference with the biological activity of IL-6.
This may occur due to inactivation of the protein. In U937 cells,
membranal peptidyltransferases inactivated the IL-6 fragments by
dimerizing them into 16-kDa complexes(58) . A different
regulatory mechanism involves a variety of agents that diminish the
ability of cells to respond to IL-6 (59, 60, 61, 62, 63) .
Natural receptor antagonists to IL-6 have not been isolated, to the
best of our knowledge. However, it has been reported that oncostatin M,
at high doses, is an IL-6 antagonist in a hepatoma cell
model(64) . These cells do not harbor oncostatin M receptors
and the factor binds through the gp130 signal transduction
transmembrane receptor which is part of the IL-6 receptor complex. A
recent study of alveolar macrophages from smokers showed that these
cells release upon lipopolysaccharide stimulation a mediator that
antagonized the ability of IL-6 to support the growth of B9
cells(65) . This activity was not biochemically isolated. Our
results indicate that the pleiotropic cytokine activin A is identical
with restrictin-P and that this molecule is an antagonist of IL-6 and
IL-11. Since in our experiments restrictin-P acted in subnanogram
amounts, it is likely that the function we describe has physiological
significance. Unrelated cell systems were studied, i.e. proliferating hybridomas, differentiating myeloblasts, and
activated hepatoma cells. In these different cell systems, the inducer
molecule IL-6 caused different biological outcomes, but, nonetheless,
restrictin-P similarly antagonized the IL-6 functions implying that
restrictin-P may be a universal antagonist of IL-6. Cytokines that
affect hemopoiesis are pleiotropic both from the point of view of
target cells and in the biological consequence of their actions.
Lineage-specific inducers are rare, and the explanation for the
formation of tissue sites in which only one cell type accumulates
requires an alternative explanation. It is conceivable that the
interplay between inducer molecules and corresponding inhibitors would
determine which cell type predominates in a particular tissue site. The
theory of restrictins maintains that the growth of each hemopoietic
cell type is negatively regulated by a lineage-specific inhibitor (66, 67, 68, 69) . This may be a
mechanism to prevent specifically the survival of cells in nondesirable
sites. The identification of restrictin-P as a stromal activin A and
the demonstration that it is an antagonist of IL-6 and IL-11, which are
growth factors for plasma-like cells, provides support to this notion.
The antagonist is specific for the growth factor and through this
property it would not be restrictive to other cells that depend on
alternative growth factors.
FOOTNOTES
- *
- The costs of
publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of
page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked
``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
- §
- Incumbent of the Joe and Celia Weinstein
Professorial Chair at the Weizmann Institute. To whom correspondence
should be addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology, The Weizmann Institute of
Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Tel.: 972-8-343335; Fax: 972-8-344125.
- (
) - The abbreviations used are: CSF,
colony-stimulating factor; M, macrophage; G, granulocyte; TGF-
,
transforming growth factor ; IL, interleukin; FCS, fetal calf
serum; r, recombinant; MTT,
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; PAGE,
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; Mu, murine; Hu, human; FPLC, fast
protein liquid chromatography; RP-HPLC, reverse phase high performance
liquid chromatography.
REFERENCES
- Metcalf, D. (1985) Science 229, 16-22
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Warren, D. J., Slørdal, L., and Moore, M. A. S. (1990) Eur. J. Haematol. 45, 158-163
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sporn, M. B., and Roberts, A. B. (1992) J. Cell Biol. 119, 1017-1021
[Free Full Text]
- Stoeck, M., Miescher, S., MacDonald, H. R., and Von Fliedner, V. (1989) J. Cell. Physiol. 141, 65-73
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Craig, R. W., and Buchan, H. L. (1989) J. Cell. Physiol. 141, 46-52
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Grawunder, U., Melchers, F., and Rolink, A. (1993) Eur. J. Immunol. 23, 544-551
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fairbairn, L. J., Cowling, G. J., Reipert, B. M., and Dexter, T. M. (1993) Cell 74, 823-832
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Laster, S. M., Wood, J. G., and Gooding, L. R. (1988) J. Immunol. 141, 2629-2634
[Abstract]
- Boise, L. H., González-Garcia, M., Postema, C. E., Ding, L., Lindsten, T., Turka, L. A., Mao, X., Nuñez, G., and Thompson, C. B. (1993) Cell 74, 597-608
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rodriguez-Tarduchy, G., Malde, P., Lopez-Rivas, A., and Collins, M. K. L. (1992) J. Immunol. 148, 1416-1422
[Abstract]
- Honigwachs-Sha'anani, J., Brosh, N., Kompier, R., Kadouri, A., and Zipori, D. (1991) Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 628, 287-297
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zipori, D., Tamir, M., Toledo, J., and Oren, T. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 4547-4551
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Zipori, D. (1980) Cell Tissue Kinet. 13, 287-298
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zipori, D. (1981) Cell Tissue Kinet. 14, 479-488
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kadouri, A., Kompier, R., Honigwachs-Sha'anani, J., Toledo, J., Brosh, N., Sternberg, D., Levy, A., Tzehoval, E., and Zipori, D. (1992) Int. J. Cell Cloning 10, 299-308
[Abstract]
- Sternberg, D., Honigwachs-Sha'anani, J., Brosh, N., Malik, Z., Burstein, Y., and Zipori, D. (1995) Growth Factors , in press
- Malik, Z., Babushkin, T., Ladan, H., Weis, H., Nitzan, Y., Sha'anani, J., and Zipori, D. (1992) Micron. Microsc. Acta 23, 369-370
- Zipori, D., Friedman, A., Tamir, M., Silverberg, D., and Malik, Z. (1984) J. Cell. Physiol. 118, 143-152
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zipori, D., Duksin, D., Tamir, M., Argaman, A., Toledo, J., and Malik, Z. (1985) J. Cell. Physiol. 122, 81-90
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Laskov, R., and Scharff, M. D. (1970) J. Exp. Med. 131, 515-541
[Abstract]
- Köhler, G., and Milstein, C. (1976) Eur. J. Immunol. 6, 511-519
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sklar, M. D., Shevach, E. M., Green, I., and Potter, M. (1975) Nature 253, 550-552
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zipori, D., and Bol, S. (1979) Exp. Hematol. 7, 206-218
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hyman, R., and Stallings, V. (1974) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 52, 429-436
- Warner, N. L., Moore, M. A. S., and Metcalf, D. (1969) J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 43, 963-982
- Ralph, P., Moore, M. A. S., and Nilsson, K. (1976) J. Exp. Med. 143, 1528-1533
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Helle, M., Boeije, L., and Aarden, L. A. (1988) Eur. J. Immunol. 18, 1535-1540
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ichikawa, Y. (1969) J. Cell. Physiol. 74, 223-234
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lotem, J., Shabo, Y., and Sachs, L. (1989) Leukemia 3, 804-807
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mosmann, T. (1983) J. Immunol. Methods 65, 55-63
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Breton, J., La Fiura, A., Bertolero, F., Orsini, G., Valsasina, B., Ziliotto, R., De Filippis, V., Polverino de Laureto, P., and Fontana, A. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 227, 573-581
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Chen, L., Shulman, L. M., and Revel, M. (1991) J. Biol. Regul. Homeostatic Agents 5, 125-136
- Munson, P. J., and Rodbard, D. (1980) Anal. Biochem. 107, 220-239
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ryder, K., Lau, L. F., and Nathans D. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 1487-1491
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wegenka, U. M., Buschmann, J., Lütticken, C., and Horn, F. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 276-288
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wagner, B. J., Hayes, T. E., Hoban, C. J., and Cochran, B. H. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 4477-4484
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mason, A. J., Hayflick, J. S., Ling, N., Esch, F., Ueno, N., Ying, S.-Y., Guillemin, R., Niall, H., and Seeburg, P. H. (1985) Nature 318, 659-673
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Robertson, D. M., Foulds, L. M., Prisk, M., and Hedger, M. P. (1992) Endocrinology 130, 1680-1687
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Murata, M., Eto, Y., Shibai, H., Sakai, M., and Muramatsu, M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 2434-2438
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Burger, R., and Gramatzki, M. (1993) J. Immunol. Methods 158, 147-148
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gauldie, J., Richards, C., Harnish, D., Lansdorp, P., and Baumann, H. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 7251-7255
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Taniguchi, T. (1995) Science 268, 251-255
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yu, J., Shao, L.-E., Lemas, V., Yu, A. L., Vaughan, J., Rivier, J., and Vale, W. (1987) Nature 330, 765-767
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Eto, Y., Tsuji, T., Takezawa, M., Takano, S., Yokogawa, Y., and Shibai, H. (1987) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 142, 1095-1103
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Broxmeyer, H. E., Lu, L., Cooper, S., Schwall, R. H., Mason, A. J., and Nikolics, K. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 9052-9056
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Nakao, K., Kosaka, M., and Saito, S. (1991) Exp. Hematol. 19, 1090-1095
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Yamashita, T., Takahashi, S., and Ogata, E. (1992) Blood 79, 304-307
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Mathews, L. S., and Vale, W. W. (1991) Cell 65, 973-982
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Levy, Y., Tsapis, A., and Brouet, J.-C. (1991) J. Clin. Invest. 88, 696-699
- Wong, G. G., and Clark, S. C. (1988) Immunol. Today 9, 137-139
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Van Snick, J. (1990) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 8, 253-278
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ikebuchi, K., Wong, G. G., Clark, S. C., Ihle, J. N., Hirai, Y., and Ogawa, M. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 9035-9039
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hoang, T., Haman, A., Goncalves, O., Wong, G. G., and Clark, S. C. (1988) Blood 72, 823-826
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bot, F. J., van Eijk, L., Broeders, L., Aarden, L. A., and Löwenberg, B. (1989) Blood 73, 435-437
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Srviastava, M. D., DeLuca, H., and Ambrus, J. L. (1994) Res. Commun. Chem. Pathol. Pharmacol. 83, 145-150
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Breuninger, L., Goonewardene, I. M., Dempsey, W. L., and Murasko, D. M. (1994) Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 72, 264-272
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Funkhouser, S. W., Martinez-Maza, O., and Vredevoe, D. L. (1994) Environ. Res. 66, 77-86
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Laouar, A., Villiers, C., Sancéau, J., Maison, C., Colomb, M., Wietzerbin, J., and Bauvois, B. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 215, 825-831
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Baumann, H., and Strassmann, G. (1993) J. Immunol. 151, 1456-1462
[Abstract]
- Kasukabe, T., Okabe-Kado, J., Hozumi, M., and Honma, Y. (1994) Cancer Res. 54, 592-597
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kasukabe, T., Okabe-Kado, J., Honma, Y., and Hozumi, M. (1992) Leukemia Res. 16, 1191-1196
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ruhl, S., Feldman, G. M., Akahane, K., and Pluznik, D. H. (1993) Blood 82, 2641-2648
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Oritani, K., Kaisho, T., Nakajima, K., and Hirano, T. (1992) Blood 80, 2298-2305
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sporeno, E., Paonessa, G., Salvati, A. L., Graziani, R., Delmastro, P., Ciliberto, G., and Toniatti, C. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10991-10995
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Twigg, H. L., III, Wilkes, D. S., and Soliman, D. M. (1994) J. Lab. Clin. Med. 124, 283-292
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zipori, D. (1990) Cancer Cells 2, 205-211
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zipori, D. (1989) Eur. J. Haematol. 42, 225-232
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zipori, D., Kalai, M., and Tamir, M. (1988) Nat. Immun. Cell Growth Regul. 7, 185-192
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zipori, D. (1992) FASEB J. 6, 2691-2697
[Abstract]
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Lacerte, E.-H. Lee, R. Reynaud, L. Canaff, C. de Guise, D. Devost, S. Ali, G. N. Hendy, and J.-J. Lebrun
Activin Inhibits Pituitary Prolactin Expression and Cell Growth through Smads, Pit-1 and Menin
Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2004;
18(6):
1558 - 1569.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Brown, L. Li, D. E. Houston-Hawkins, and M. M. Matzuk
Activins Are Critical Modulators of Growth and Survival
Mol. Endocrinol.,
December 1, 2003;
17(12):
2404 - 2417.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Harrison, P. C. Gray, S. C. Koerber, W. Fischer, and W. Vale
Identification of a Functional Binding Site for Activin on the Type I Receptor ALK4
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 30, 2003;
278(23):
21129 - 21135.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Shav-Tal and D. Zipori
The Role of Activin A in Regulation of Hemopoiesis
Stem Cells,
November 1, 2002;
20(6):
493 - 500.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Shoham, E. Yaniv, R. Koren, R. Gal, R. Parameswaran, A. Kravitz, H. Geron, D. Markovitz, M. Lantzki, and D. Zipori
Reduced Expression of Activin A in Focal Lymphoid Agglomerates Within Nasal Polyps
J. Histochem. Cytochem.,
October 1, 2001;
49(10):
1245 - 1252.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Zipori and M. Barda-Saad
Role of activin A in negative regulation of normal and tumor B lymphocytes
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
June 1, 2001;
69(6):
867 - 873.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Hjertner, H. Hjorth-Hansen, M. Borset, C. Seidel, A. Waage, and A. Sundan
Bone morphogenetic protein-4 inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of multiple myeloma cells
Blood,
January 15, 2001;
97(2):
516 - 522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Lau, T. R. Kumar, K. Nishimori, J. Bonadio, and M. M. Matzuk
Activin beta C and beta E Genes Are Not Essential for Mouse Liver Growth, Differentiation, and Regeneration
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
August 15, 2000;
20(16):
6127 - 6137.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kitamura, S.-i. Aota, R. Sakamoto, S.-I. Yoshikawa, and K. Okazaki
Smad7 selectively interferes with different pathways of activin signaling and inhibits erythroid leukemia cell differentiation
Blood,
June 1, 2000;
95(11):
3371 - 3379.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Yamato, T. Koseki, M. Ohguchi, M. Kizaki, Y. Ikeda, and T. Nishihara
Activin A Induction of Cell-Cycle Arrest Involves Modulation of Cyclin D2 and p21CIP1/WAF1 in Plasmacytic Cells
Mol. Endocrinol.,
July 1, 1997;
11(8):
1044 - 1052.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Du and D. A. Williams
Interleukin-11: Review of Molecular, Cell Biology, and Clinical Use
Blood,
June 1, 1997;
89(11):
3897 - 3908.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Zauberman, S. Lapter, and D. Zipori
Smad Proteins Suppress CCAAT/Enhancer-binding Protein (C/EBP) beta - and STAT3-mediated Transcriptional Activation of the Haptoglobin Promoter
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 29, 2001;
276(27):
24719 - 24725.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|