|
Volume 270,
Number 7,
Issue of February 17, 1995 pp. 2952-2956
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Transport of
Serum Transthyretin into Chicken Oocytes
A RECEPTOR-MEDIATED MECHANISM (*)
(Received for publication, August 31, 1994)
Amandio V.
Vieira
(1), (§),
Esmond J.
Sanders
(2),
Wolfgang J.
Schneider
(1)(¶)From the
(1)Department of Molecular Genetics,
University and Biocenter, 1030 Vienna, Austria and the
(2)Department of Physiology, University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2S2, Canada
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Transthyretin (TTR) is involved in the transport of thyroid
hormones and, due to its interaction with serum retinol-binding
protein, also of vitamin A. The importance of both ligands in
vertebrate embryonic development has prompted us to investigate the
molecular details of TTR transport function in a powerful germ cell
system, the rapidly growing chicken oocytes. Yolk TTR is derived from
the circulatory system, since biotinylated TTR was recovered by
immunoaffinity chromatography of yolk obtained from a hen previously
infused with invitro biotinylated chicken serum
proteins. In concordance with the intraoocytic localization in an
endosomal compartment, ligand blotting and chemical cross-linking
experiments revealed the presence of a 115-kDa TTR-binding oocyte
membrane protein. This putative TTR receptor was not detected in
chicken ovarian granulosa cells or embryonic fibroblasts and was
different from the previously described oocyte-specific receptor for
two estrogen-induced chicken serum lipoproteins, vitellogenin and very
low density lipoprotein (Barber, D. L., Sanders, E. J., Aebersold, R.,
and Schneider, W. J.(1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266,
18761-18770). Furthermore, in contrast to the serum levels of the
yolk precursor lipoproteins, those of TTR were not significantly
changed by estrogen; thus, TTR represents a newly defined,
estrogen-independent class of yolk precursor proteins. These data
strongly suggest that oocytic TTR is derived from the circulation,
where it is a constitutive component, and deposited into yolk as a
result of endocytosis mediated by a specific receptor.
INTRODUCTION
Transthyretin (TTR, ( )previously called prealbumin)
is a 60-kDa homotetrameric protein present in serum and
cerebrospinal fluid of vertebrates. The three-dimensional crystal
structure is known for normal human TTR (1) as well as for a
mutant TTR involved in familial amyloidic polyneuropathic
disease(2) . Based on the known primary structure of chicken
TTR(3) , the tertiary and quaternary structures of the human
and chicken proteins are predicted to be highly similar(3) .
The amino acid sequences of TTRs of chicken (130 amino acids) and man
(127 amino acids) are 78% identical overall and completely identical in
a central channel formed by the tetrameric assembly of the
monomers(3) . TTR binds the thyroid hormones, T and
T , directly in this central
channel(1, 4, 5) , and it transports retinol
(vitamin A) indirectly by interacting with serum retinol-binding
protein (RBP)(6, 7) . Both thyroid hormones and
metabolites of retinol, acting through their respective nuclear
receptors, have been shown to be important in the embryonic development
of many vertebrates including oviparous (egg laying) species, such as
the
chicken(8, 9, 10, 11, 12) .
But despite these effects, it is not yet known how the oocytes acquire
the necessary thyroid hormones and retinoids. Stated differently, many
questions remain about the fate of circulatory TTR. Which cell types
can interact with TTR? Do the ligands of TTR play any role in its
cellular interactions? Does such interaction lead to endocytosis of TTR
and/or RBP? Uptake of TTR has thus far been shown to occur in
cultured human HepG2 hepatoma cells and has been proposed to occur in
other human and rat cells (e.g. adenocarcinoma, primary
hepatocytes, neuroblastoma) by a receptor-mediated
mechanism(13) . However, there are also some reports that free
T and T can be taken up directly by primary
hepatocytes (14) and erythrocytes (15) via cell
membrane transporters. In a previous study, we detected TTR in
clathrin-coated vesicles of chicken oocytes and proposed that its
uptake occurs by receptor-mediated endocytosis(16) . Indeed,
the very rapid growth phase of the oocyte has been shown to involve
receptor-mediated endocytosis of certain other circulatory proteins and
lipoproteins(17, 18, 19, 20, 21) .
In this report, we provide the first direct evidence for the uptake of
serum transthyretin into growing chicken oocytes, and we identify a
specific TTR-binding oocyte membrane protein that may act as a receptor
in this process. We show further that TTR differs from the previously
characterized chicken proteins that are transported from the serum into
the yolk in that its serum levels are not significantly influenced by
estrogen action.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
MaterialsProtein A-Sepharose
and cyanogen bromide-activated Sepharose were obtained from Pharmacia
Biotech Inc. The cross-linker, dithiobis(succinimidyl propionate), and
the biotinylation reagent, N-hydroxy-succinimido-biotin were
obtained from Sigma. 17 -Estradiol was obtained from Fluka and
dissolved in 1,2-propanediol (Merck) at 20 mg/ml. The sources of other
chemicals and materials are listed below or have been previously
reported(16) .
AnimalsWhite Leghorn laying hens,
approximately 1 year old, and 1-3-month-old roosters were
obtained from the Institute of Molecular Pathology, Vienna, and reared
in cages until the desired age with a 14-h light period and free access
to food and water. Female New Zealand White rabbits (2-3 kg, body
weight) were used for the anti-chicken serum TTR antibody production as
previously described (16) .
Preparation of TTR and TTR RBP Complex and
Radiolabeling ProceduresPurified human serum TTR was
purchased from Calbiochem and dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS, 140 mM NaCl, 3 mM KCl, 8 mM Na HPO , pH 7.5) at 1 mg/ml. Chicken serum
TTR was prepared by immunoaffinity chromatography as previously
described (16) . Chicken serum TTR RBP complex was
purified as previously described(16) . TTR was radioiodinated
with Na I using the Iodo-Gen (Pierce) method (22) to a specific activity of 600 cpm/ng. Upon analysis by
SDS-PAGE, the labeled TTR behaved like the unlabeled ligand in that it
migrated as a band with an apparent molecular mass of 33 kDa in
unheated samples (presumably a dimeric
structure(23, 24) ) and as a 13-kDa monomer when
heated.
Ligand BlottingAll operations were
performed at room temperature (23 °C). Chicken oocyte membrane
detergent extract was prepared exactly as previously
described(19) . Aliquots of the extract were subjected to
SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions and electroblotted onto
nitrocellulose as previously described(22, 25) . Two
nitrocellulose strips were cut from each lane and blocked for 3 h in 3%
(w/v) bovine serum albumin dissolved in TBSC (50 mM Tris-HCl,
100 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl , pH 7.5). I-TTR (4 µg/ml) with or without a 30-fold molar
excess of unlabeled TTR was added to 0.5 ml of the TBSC-bovine serum
albumin and incubated for 2 h. After 5 washes in TBSC, the strips were
allowed to dry and were subjected to autoradiography. As a control, one
of the strips was probed with I-vitellogenin (VTG) as
previously described (22) to reveal the 95- and 380-kDa chicken
oocyte lipoprotein receptors(21, 22, 26) . Chicken ovarian granulosa cells and embryonic fibroblasts were
cultured, and membrane extracts were prepared from them as described in (25) .
Cross-linking of TTR and Oocyte
MembranesChicken oocyte membrane extract (300 µl
containing 1.5 mg of protein) and 30 µl (6 10 cpm, 10 µg) of I-TTR were added to 1.5-ml
Eppendorf tubes containing 80 µl of PBS with or without 800 µg
of purified human TTR. The tubes were incubated at room temperature
with occasional mixing for 1 h. Then, dithiobis(succinimidyl
propionate) cross-linker (2 µl; final concentration, 1 mM)
dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide was added to both tubes and allowed to
react for 20 min on ice before quenching with 30 µl of 1 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5. Purified preimmune rabbit IgG (33 µl, 350
µg) was then added to both tubes and allowed to bind for 3 h before
the addition of 100 µl of protein A-Sepharose (50% (v/v) suspension
in PBS) and incubation for 1 h. The tubes were then microcentrifuged at
full speed for 20 s, and the supernatants were transferred to new
tubes. The pellets were washed twice with 1% (w/v) Triton X-100 in PBS,
first with 150 µl and then with 500 µl, by gentle vortexing
followed by microcentrifugation as above. The final washed pellets are
designated ``non-immune'' precipitates. Each of the first
washes (150 µl) was combined with its respective supernatant;
purified anti-chicken serum TTR IgG (33 µl, 360 µg) was added
and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The subsequent protein A-Sepharose
precipitation and wash steps were performed as above to yield the two
final pellets designated ``immune'' precipitates.The
precipitates were mixed with 150 µl of SDS-PAGE sample buffer
(non-reducing), heated at 95 °C for 2 min to release the bound IgG
and ligand complexes, and briefly microcentrifuged at maximum speed.
Maximum volumes of supernatants (60,000 cpm from the immune and 11,000
cpm from the non-immune reactions) were then loaded on a 4.5-18%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and subjected to electrophoresis under
non-reducing conditions. The gels were subsequently stained, destained,
dried, and subjected to autoradiography(22) .
Biotinylation of Serum and Injection into Laying
HensN-Hydroxy-succinimido-biotin (40 µmol)
dissolved in 1 ml of dimethylformamide was added to 5 ml of laying hen
serum. After incubation for 1 h at room temperature, the mixture was
dialyzed at 4 °C overnight against two changes of TBS (50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4). Blotting with
streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (see below) demonstrated that a
wide size range of proteins had been biotinylated. Furthermore, it was
confirmed that purified human and chicken TTR were indeed biotinylated
under the conditions used to biotinylate serum and that the biotin-TTRs
were still recognized by the respective anti-human and anti-chicken TTR
IgG (data not shown, cf. Fig. 1). The biotinylated
serum was filtered through 0.8-µm Millipore (Millex-HA) filters and
then injected (4.5 ml) via a wing vein into the circulatory system of
the hen.
Figure 1:
Detection of intravenously administered
biotinylated chicken serum TTR in yolk. Whole laying hen serum was
biotinylated and then reinjected into a laying hen as described under
``Experimental Procedures.'' Subsequently, oocytic yolk from
the injected hen (lanes1 and 3) and a
control hen (lanes2 and 4) was subjected to
anti-TTR immunoaffinity chromatography. The column eluates were
analyzed for biotinylated proteins with streptavidin-horseradish
peroxidase (A) and for TTR with anti-TTR IgG (B);
detection was performed by the ECL method. The positions of migration
of the two expected TTR species (monomer, 13 kDa; dimer, 33 kDa) are
indicated by arrowheads. The two larger size protein bands
observed in lane1 likely represent biotinylated
proteins that interact nonspecifically with the IgG-Sepharose
immunoaffinity matrix (see
``Results'').
Preparation of Yolk and Immunoaffinity
ChromatographyThe hen was sacrificed 42 h post-injection,
and the ovary was transferred to ice-cold PBS. Working on ice over a
period of 30-60 min, the large follicles (15-30 mm in
diameter) were dissected from the ovary; each was punctured once with a
needle, and the yolk was allowed to flow into a clean vessel. Contact
of the yolk with any external part of the follicle was avoided. The
yolk (``biotin yolk'') was collected and pooled, and an
aqueous yolk extract was prepared exactly as previously
described(16) . In the same way, an aqueous yolk extract was
prepared from the 15-30-mm follicles of an uninjected chicken
(``control yolk'').The anti-chicken TTR IgG-Sepharose
immunoaffinity column for isolation of TTR has been previously
described(16) . Control and biotin yolk (15 ml each) were mixed
with 1.5 ml of 10 PBS and subjected to TTR immunoaffinity
chromatography as described(16) , except that the final low pH
column eluate was collected in 1-ml aliquots into tubes containing 100
µl of 2 M Tris-HCl, pH 8. The contents of the tubes
containing the eluted protein peak (A > 0.1)
were pooled and concentrated using Centricon 10 microconcentrators
(Amicon). The TTR component of the eluted biotin-TTR was detected by
immunoblotting with anti-TTR IgG followed by protein A-horseradish
peroxidase, and its biotin moiety was detected by probing the blots
with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase. For both blots, the final
step involved the horseradish peroxidase-dependent generation and
detection of ECL according to the instructions supplied with the ECL
kit (Amersham Corp.).
Estrogen Treatment of Roosters and Preparation of
SerumA total of three roosters were injected into the leg
muscle with 20 mg of 17 -estradiol/kg of body weight. At various
times post-injection (6-125 h), they were bled from a wing vein.
The blood was allowed to clot for 2-4 h at 4 °C and then
subjected to a 3-min centrifugation. The serum was removed, diluted
with 4 volumes of PBS, and kept frozen at -20 °C. The same
procedure was used for the preparation of control rooster and laying
hen serum.
Other MethodsElectroblotting was
performed in a solution containing 25 mM Tris and 190 mM glycine. Protein concentrations were determined by the method of
Lowry et al.(27) .
RESULTS
In previous biochemical analyses of the distribution of TTR
by immunoaffinity chromatography and Western blotting, we have shown
its presence in yolk(16) . In fact, TTR and RBP could be
demonstrated in oocytic coated vesicles(16) , indicating a
specific uptake pathway. Moreover, analysis of chicken yolk by
immuno-electron microscopy has revealed that other serum components,
for which specific receptors have been identified, are found in the
electron-lucent phase of yolk(19, 20) , which
represents a compartment derived from endocytic transport
vesicles(16, 18, 20) . Thus, we first
wanted to determine directly whether circulatory TTR is the precursor
of TTR found in the yolk of growing oocytes. To this end, whole laying
hen serum was biotinylated and reinjected into the hen, and biotin-TTR
was recovered from yolk. Biotinylation was selected instead of
radioiodination because of greater sensitivity in combination with ECL
detection and to avoid in vivo and reisolation experiments
with large amounts of radioactivity. The biotinylation reaction was
highly efficient as determined by probing control and biotinylated
serum proteins, after SDS-PAGE and transfer to nitrocellulose, with
streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (data not shown). Chromatography of
yolk from oocytes of the hen injected with biotinylated serum proteins
on an anti-TTR IgG-Sepharose column and blotting of the immunoaffinity
column eluate with streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase revealed the
presence of serum biotin-TTR in the oocyte (Fig. 1A, lane1 and B, lane3). The
control yolk from an uninjected hen, as expected, was only positive for
the TTR analysis with the antibody (Fig. 1B, lane4) but not for biotin-TTR (Fig. 1A, lane2). With evidence from other studies (17, 18, 19, 20, 21) that
oocytic uptake of certain serum components in oviparous organisms is a
specific, receptor-mediated process, we tested oocyte membrane proteins
for the presence of TTR-binding components by ligand blotting ( Fig. 2and Fig. 3) and chemical cross-linking (Fig. 4). The ligand blots revealed a I-TTR-binding component with a relative molecular mass of
approximately 115 kDa (Fig. 2, lane1). The
binding of I-TTR to the 115-kDa protein could be competed
for by unlabeled TTR (Fig. 2, lane2) but not
by the serum albumin present in the blotting buffer. This component
clearly was distinct from the abundant and well characterized 95- and
380-kDa oocytic lipoprotein receptors (19, 26) (Fig. 2, lane3).
Membranes from cultured chicken granulosa cells (somatic cells that
enclose the oocyte in the ovarian follicle) (Fig. 2, lane4) and chicken embryo fibroblasts (lane5) were also tested. However, no TTR-binding component
could be detected, even though much higher amounts of somatic cell
membrane proteins were analyzed than used for oocytes. Recognition of
TTR and/or the TTR RBP complex by the 115-kDa oocyte membrane
protein was confirmed by ligand blotting using the isolated unlabeled
ligand complex, followed by detection with anti-TTR IgG (Fig. 3).
Figure 2:
Ligand blotting analysis of cellular
membrane proteins for the presence of TTR-binding components. The blots
were performed as described under ``Experimental
Procedures.'' Membrane proteins from chicken oocytes (lanes1-3, 75 µg each), granulosa cells (lane4, 200 µg), and embryo fibroblasts (lane5, 200 µg) were transferred to nitrocellulose and
probed with I-TTR (4 µg/ml, 600 cpm/ng) in the
absence (lanes1, 4, and5) or presence (lane2) of a 30-fold
molar excess of unlabeled TTR. Lane3 was incubated
with I-vitellogenin (20 µg/ml, 50 cpm/ng). Molecular
mass standards (kDa) are indicated to the left of lane1.
Figure 3:
Ligand blot analysis using isolated
TTR RBP complex. Oocyte membrane proteins (75 µg/lane) were
separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose, and incubated
with chicken TTR RBP complex (lane1, none; lane2, 4 µg/ml) for 3 h at 24 °C. Bound TTR
was detected by incubation with anti-chicken TTR IgG followed by I-labeled protein A and autoradiography. The position of
migration of molecular mass standards are indicated on the right (from top to bottom, in kDa: 200, 116, 97, 68,
and 45).
Figure 4:
Cross-linking analysis for TTR-binding
components on chicken oocyte membranes. Detergent-solubilized membranes
were incubated with chicken I-TTR in the absence (lanes1 and 3) or presence (lanes2 and 4) of 100-fold excess of unlabeled human
TTR, cross-linked, and immunoprecipitated with rabbit anti-chicken TTR
IgG (lanes1 and 2) or non-immune IgG (lanes3 and 4) as described under
``Experimental Procedures.'' Electrophoresis was performed
under nonreducing conditions. Molecular mass standards (kDa) and the
top of the separating gel are indicated to the left of lane1.
Finally, we addressed the characterization of the
putative TTR receptor by an alternative method. With oocyte membrane
proteins in the soluble phase, we performed cross-linking reactions
with I-TTR followed by immunoprecipitation with anti-TTR
IgG (Fig. 4). The cross-linking reaction between TTR and oocyte
membrane proteins resulted in a ligand-membrane protein complex of
175-180 kDa and a very minor, less defined component of
approximately 160 kDa. Possibly, this minor component is a breakdown
product of the major reactive protein or represents a different
TTR-binding species. Other minor bands seen in the immunoprecipitates (lanes1 and 2) but not in the nonimmune
controls (lanes3 and 4) may represent
higher order TTR structures (e.g. tetramers and/or products of
the oxidative action of Iodo-Gen). Since under these conditions TTR can
be expected to exist as a tetramer of 60 kDa, the apparent size of the
cross-linked complex is compatible with the binding of a TTR tetramer
to the 115-kDa protein identified in ligand blots. The major bands (13
and 33 kDa) seen in Fig. 4, lane1, represent
the TTR monomer and dimer, respectively, which are stable in SDS under
nonreducing conditions (described in (23) and (24) ).
Because the anti-chicken TTR antibody does not recognize human TTR,
these bands were undiminished when excess unlabeled human TTR was
included in the incubations (Fig. 4, lane2).
Thus, by a variety of methods using human or chicken TTR, the 115-kDa
protein was consistently identified as a specific TTR-binding oocyte
membrane protein. At the onset of egg laying, the sudden rise in
circulatory estrogen levels causes a dramatic induction of hepatic
synthesis and serum levels of egg yolk precursor proteins and
lipoproteins(28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33) .
The effect of estrogen is readily observed and typically studied in
roosters by injecting them with
17 -estradiol(28, 29, 30, 31, 32) .
Previously characterized proteins and lipoproteins, e.g. VTG (Fig. 5), which are induced in the hen, taken up by the oocyte,
and deposited into yolk, are also induced rapidly (within 24-48
h) (cf. (31) ) in the rooster
model(28, 29, 30, 32, 33) .
In contrast, Fig. 5shows that estrogen treatment does not
significantly change serum TTR levels relative to those in control
roosters over a period of at least 125 h (Fig. 5, upperpanel). As expected, serum vitellogenin is strongly
induced, with peak values reached approximately 60 h following hormone
administration (Fig. 5, lowerpanel).
Figure 5:
Effects of estrogen treatment on serum TTR (upper panel) and VTG (lower panel) levels in
roosters. Each lane of the Western blots contains the proteins
of 2 µl of rooster serum (prepared as described under
``Experimental Procedures'') treated with 50 mM dithiothreitol. Polyclonal antibodies against TTR and VTG were
used to detect the two respective proteins at the following times for
post-estrogen treatment: lane1, 12 h; lane2, 26 h; lane3, 33 h; lane4, 57 h; lane5, 81 h; lane6, 125 h. Lane7 represents serum of
the untreated control. Molecular mass standards are indicated to the left of the respective panels.
DISCUSSION
Our experiments provide direct evidence for the endocytosis
of circulatory transthyretin by growing oocytes in an oviparous animal,
the chicken. We show, by the detection of biotinylated TTR in the yolk
of growing oocytes following intravenous administration of biotinylated
serum proteins, that efficient TTR uptake occurs in vivo. This
represents the first such demonstration for a non-lipoprotein precursor
and suggests a general procedure to study the formation of yolk from
serum components amenable to biotin tagging. Previous studies have
indicated that most of the yolk precursors present in serum are taken
up by the oocyte via specific, receptor-mediated
processes(17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 26) .
We have shown that there are two (95 and 380 kDa) receptors on the
chicken oocyte membrane that interact with the major yolk components
very low density lipoprotein, VTG, and possibly
 -macroglobulin(19, 21, 22, 26) .
Here, we show in two differently designed ligand-blotting experiments ( Fig. 2and Fig. 3) that free as well as RBP-complexed TTR
interacts with a different oocyte component, i.e. a
115-kDa membrane protein. In addition, chemical cross-linking (Fig. 4) confirmed the binding of a similarly sized membrane
protein to the 60-kDa TTR tetramer. In this context, it is noted that a
considerable portion of circulatory TTR in vertebrates is present
complexed to RBP ( (16) and Refs. therein), and in addition to
TTR, TTR RBP complexes can be isolated from yolk(16) . It
would be of interest to address TTR RBP transport by the
biotinylation technique described here for TTR; unfortunately, however,
it cannot be applied to complexed RBP, as it is not readily labeled by
biotinylation (nor by iodination). ( )Future studies are
necessary to determine if the TTR receptor we have identified is
involved in the oocyte-directed uptake of free TTR as well as of
TTR RBP complexes. Estrogen treatment of roosters mimics the
laying hen situation in that it dramatically increases the levels of
serum components that, in the laying hen, are known to be massively
endocytosed by the oocyte (28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33) .
Our present results, however, do not show an increase in the serum
levels of TTR after estrogen administration. Furthermore, in Western
blots of serum, laying hen TTR levels do not appear higher than in
roosters (data not shown). Although we have not ruled out that estrogen
affects both the rate of synthesis and catabolism (or
clearance) of serum TTR, it is clear that TTR belongs to a class of
proteins whose serum levels are not significantly changed by estrogen
but which nevertheless are efficiently transported to the oocyte. One
possible explanation for this difference between TTR and most major
yolk proteins is that large fluctuations in the levels of TTR could
adversely affect the controlled delivery of the important regulatory
ligands, thyroid hormones and retinol, to peripheral cells. Consistent
with this idea, preliminary results suggest that serum levels of RBP
are similarly refractory to estrogen. ( )Thus, cell-specific
receptors such as the 115-kDa protein identified here are likely
mediating the accumulation of regulatory molecules in growing oocytes. It is not known whether the TTR protein itself plays any role in
oogenesis and embryogenesis. However, the hormones that TTR transports
from the serum into the oocyte have been shown to have important
functions in embryogenesis in a wide variety of species. In the
chicken, thyroid hormones have been reported to accumulate in the yolk
during oogenesis(34) . Although the role of TTR was not
examined in that study, it was noted that the highest accumulation of
the hormones per unit mass occurs in the smallest oocytes(34) .
We have previously reported that TTR levels relative to total yolk
protein are also highest in the smaller oocytes(16) . The
thyroid hormone, T , as well as various derivatives of
retinol (e.g. all-trans retinoic acid and 9-cis retinoic acid)
affect expression of important regulatory genes through their
respective nuclear
receptors(8, 10, 12, 35, 36, 37) .
Furthermore, the nuclear receptors for T and retinoids can
affect each others' activities through their common
heterodimerization partner, retinoid X receptor, another nuclear
retinoid-binding receptor (38, 39, 40, 41) . In this respect,
it is interesting to speculate that the uptake of both retinol and
T into the oocyte may be co-regulated as a result of their
common interaction with TTR and the subsequent interaction of the
complex with the oocytic TTR receptor.
FOOTNOTES
- *
- These
studies were supported by the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical
Research and the Austrian Fonds zur Förderung der
wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Project P-9040-MOB). The costs of
publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of
page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked
``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
- §
- This work represents partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the Ph.D. degree from The University of Alberta.
Current address: Dept. of Cell Biology, Scripps Research Institute, La
Jolla, CA 92037-1027.
- ¶
- To whom correspondence
should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Genetics, University and
Biocenter Vienna, Dr. Bohrgasse 9/2, Vienna, Austria. Tel.:
43-1-79515-2113; Fax: 43-1-79515-2013.
- (
) - The
abbreviations used are: TTR, transthyretin; RBP, retinol-binding
protein; T
, 3,5,3`-L-triiodothyronine;
T , 3,5,3`,5`-L-tetraiodothyronine; VTG,
vitellogenin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
- (
) - A. V. Vieira and W. J.
Schneider, unpublished observations.
- (
) - A. V.
Vieira, K. Kuchler, and W. J. Schneider, unpublished observations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Rita Lo for excellent technical assistance
and Dr. P. M. Vieira for helpful discussion. Dr. S. Stifani kindly
provided the rabbit anti-VTG IgG.
REFERENCES
- Blake, C. C. F., Geisow, M. J., Oatley, S. J., Rerat, B., and Rerat, C. (1978) J. Mol. Biol. 121, 339-356
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Terry, C. J., Damas, A. M., Oliveira, P., Saraiva, M. J. M., Alves, I. L., Costa, P. P., Matias, P. M., Sakaki, Y., and Blake, C. C. F. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 735-741
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Duan, W., Achen, M., Richardson, S., Lawrence, M., Wettenhall, R., Jaworowsky, A., and Schreiber, G. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 200, 679-687
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ferguson, R. N., Edelhoch, H., Saroff, H. A., and Robbins, J. (1975) Biochemistry 14, 282-289
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Robbins, J., and Rall, J. E. (1960) Physiol. Rev. 40, 415-489
[Free Full Text]
- Kanai, M., Raz, A., and Goodman, D. S. (1968) J. Clin. Invest. 47, 2025-2044
- van Jaarsveld, P. P., Edelhoch, H., Goodman, D. S., and Robbins, J. (1973) J. Biol. Chem. 248, 4698-4707
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schuh, T. J., Hall, B. L., Kraft, J. C., Privalsky, M. L., and Kimelman, D. (1993) Development 119, 785-798
[Abstract]
- Thaller, C., and Eichele, G. (1987) Nature 327, 625-628
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lohnes, D., Kastner, P., Dierich, M., Mark, M., LeMeur, M., and Chambon, P. (1993) Cell 73, 643-658
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- McNabb, A. (1987) J. Exp. Zool. 51, Suppl. 1, 281-290
- Maden, M., and Holder, N. (1992) BioEssays 14, 431-438
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Divino, C. M., and Schussler, G. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 1425-1429
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Blondeau, J.-P., Osty, J., and Francon, J. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 2685-2692
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Zhou, Y., Samson, M., Osty, J., Francon, J., and Blondeau, J-P. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 17000-17004
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vieira, A. V., and Schneider, W. J. (1993) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1169, 250-256
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schjeide, O. A., Wilkens, M., McCandless, R. G., Munn, R., Peterson, M., and Carlsen, E. (1963) Am. Zool. 3, 167-184
- Perry, M. M., and Gilbert, A. B. (1985) J. Ultrastruc. Res. 90, 313-322
[CrossRef]
- Barber, D. L., Sanders, E. J., Aebersold, R., and Schneider, W. J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 18761-18770
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Shen, X., Steyrer, E., Retzek, H., Sanders, E. J., and Schneider, W. J. (1993) Cell Tissue Res. 272, 459-471
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Stifani, S., Barber, D. L., Nimpf, J., and Schneider, W. J. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 1955-1959
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Stifani, S., George, R., and Schneider, W. J. (1988) Biochem. J. 250, 467-475
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Murrell, J. R., Schoner, R. G., Liepnieks, J. J., Rosen, H., Moses, A. C., and Benson, M. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16595-16600
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Espiskopou, V., Maeda, S., Nishiguchi, S., Shimada, K., Gaitanaris, G. A., Gottesman, M. E., and Robertson, E. J. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 2375-2379
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hayashi, K., Ando, S., Stifani, S., and Schneider, W. J. (1989) J. Lipid Res. 30, 1421-1428
[Abstract]
- Stifani, S., Barber, D. L., Aebersold, R., Steyrer, E., Shen, X., Nimpf, J., and Schneider, W. J. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 19079-19087
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., and Randall, R. J. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265-275
[Free Full Text]
- Jost, J.-P., Ohno, T., Panyim, S., and Scheurch, A. R. (1978) Eur. J. Biochem. 84, 355-361
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Deeley, R. G., Gordon, J. I., Burns, A. T. H., Mullinix, K. P., Bina-Stein, M., and Goldberger, R. F. (1977) J. Biol. Chem. 252, 8310-8319
[Free Full Text]
- Wiskocil, R., Bensky, P., Dower, W., Goldberger, R. F., Gordon, J. I., and Deeley, R. G. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 4474-4478
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Chan, L., Bradley, W. A., Jackson, R. L., and Means, A. R. (1980) Endocrinology 106, 275-283
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Williams, D. L., Wang, S.-Y., and Klett, H. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75, 5974-5978
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Murthy, U. S., and Adiga, P. R. (1978) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 538, 364-375
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sechman, A., and Bobek, S. (1988) Gen. Comp. Endocrin. 69, 99-105
- Giguere, V., Ong, E. S., Segui, P., and Evans, R. M. (1987) Nature 330, 624-629
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Petkovich, M., Brand, N. J., Krust, A., and Chambon, P. (1987) Nature 330, 444-450
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mangelsdorf, D. J., Ong, E. S., Dyck, J. A., and Evans, R. M. (1990) Nature 345, 224-229
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kliewer, S. A., Umesono, K., Mangelsdorf, D. J., and Evans, R. J. (1992) Nature 355, 446-449
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zhang, X., Hoffmann, B., Tran, B.-V., Grauper, G., and Pfahl, M. (1992) Nature 355, 441-446
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rosen, E. D., Beninghof, E. G., and Koenig, R. J. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 11534-11541
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yu, V. C., Delsert, C., Andersen, B., Holloway, J. M., Devary, O. V., Näär, A. M., Kim, S. Y., Boutin, J. M., Glass, C. K., and Rosenfeld, M. G. (1991) Cell 67, 1251-1266
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Bujo, M. Hermann, K. A. Lindstedt, J. Nimpf, and W. J. Schneider
Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor Gene Family Members Mediate Yolk Deposition
J. Nutr.,
May 1, 1997;
127
(5):
801S - 801S.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. M. Sousa and M. J. Saraiva
Internalization of Transthyretin. EVIDENCE OF A NOVEL YET UNIDENTIFIED RECEPTOR-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN (RAP)-SENSITIVE RECEPTOR
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 20, 2001;
276(17):
14420 - 14425.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|