Volume 270,
Number 7,
Issue of February 17, 1995 pp. 3031-3038
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
The
Myxoma Virus-soluble Interferon-
Receptor Homolog, M-T7, Inhibits
Interferon-
in a Species-specific Manner (*)
(Received for publication, September 2, 1994; and in revised form, November
22, 1994)
Karen
Mossman (§), ,
Chris
Upton (¶), ,
Grant
McFadden (**)
From the Department of Biochemistry, University of Alberta,
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2H7, Canada
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The myxoma virus M-T7 protein contains significant sequence
similarity to the ligand binding domain of the mammalian
interferon-
receptors, and functions as a soluble homolog which
can bind and inhibit the biological activities of rabbit
interferon-
(Upton, C., Mossman, K., and McFadden, G.(1992) Science 258: 1369-1372). M-T7, the most abundantly
secreted protein from myxoma virus-infected cells, was shown to be
expressed in significant biological amounts as a typical poxvirus early
gene product, efficiently secreted at early times of infection to
levels that exceed 5
10
molecules/cell, and
function as a stable inhibitory protein in infected cell supernatants
until late times of infection. M-T7 was specific in binding and
inhibiting rabbit interferon-
, and did not bind either human or
murine interferon-
. Scatchard analysis of rabbit interferon-
binding curves yielded a single high affinity binding site on M-T7,
with a K
of 1.2
10
M, which is comparable to the affinity between soluble
forms of cellular interferon-
receptors and their cognate ligands.
In comparison, rabbit interferon-
was shown to bind its cellular
receptor with a K
of 5.9
10
M, again comparable to the affinity of
membrane bound forms of other mammalian interferon-
receptors for
interferon-
. Thus, the myxoma virus M-T7 protein is a functional
soluble interferon-
receptor homolog which binds and inhibits
interferon-
with high affinity in a species-specific manner.
INTRODUCTION
Interferon-
(IFN-
) (
)is a potent
immunomodulatory cytokine primarily produced by activated T lymphocytes
and natural killer cells(1) . While IFN-
was discovered by
virtue of its anti-viral activities, it also serves critical functions
as an immunoregulator in the presence and absence of pathogenic
challenge(2, 3) . IFN-
exerts pleiotropic effects
on the immune system through ligand-dependent activation of the
IFN-
receptor (IFN-
R)(3) . The human and murine
IFN-
Rs have been extensively characterized, and are known to bind
IFN-
with high affinity in a species specific manner (4, 5) . The known mammalian IFN-
Rs are composed
of two subunits, denoted
and
. The IFN-
R
chain
possesses an extracellular ligand binding domain, a single
transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain devoid of any obvious
kinase or phosphatase motifs, but containing two important sequences
involved in internalization of the receptor-ligand complex and signal
induction (reviewed in (3) ). The IFN-
R
chain is a
type 1 transmembrane protein which confers species specificity to the
IFN-
R(6, 7) .
The importance of IFN-
within the immune system is exemplified by the observation that
IFN-
is the primary cytokine mediator of innate resistance to both
viral and non-viral pathogens(8, 9) . IFN-
functions to combat viral infections by inducing anti-viral pathways
and by modulating cellular immune responses to viral challenge. While
IFN-
does not itself directly inhibit viral multiplication, it
induces the synthesis of a variety of effector proteins which function
in inducing an anti-viral state(10, 11) . For example,
PKR, a double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase, and 2-5 A synthase
are enzymes induced by all interferons, including
IFN-
(12, 13) . IFN-
also modulates the
cellular immune response to reduce overall viral multiplication and
spread by a variety of mechanisms. IFN-
is a potent macrophage
activation factor, resulting in the elaboration of a variety of
macrophage derived cytocidal compounds, along with the production of
cytolytic and pro-inflammatory cytokines, reactive nitrogen
intermediates, and nitric oxide synthase, which produces the toxic
compound nitric
oxide(14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20) .
Aside from the activation of macrophages, IFN-
possesses the
ability to enhance the expression of major histocompatibility complex
class I and II glycoproteins, resulting in an increase of viral antigen
presentation(21, 22, 23) . Furthermore,
IFN-
induces the secretion of the ligand binding domain of the low
density lipoprotein receptor, which interferes with assembly and
budding of certain enveloped viruses(24) .
To overcome the
anti-viral and immunoregulatory effects of IFN-
, many viruses have
evolved both extracellular and intracellular anti-interferon
strategies(25, 26, 27, 28, 29) .
Poxviruses, a family of large, double-stranded DNA viruses which
replicate within the cytoplasm of host cells(30) , were the
first viruses found capable of interrupting the extracellular
ligand-dependent triggering of the IFN-
Rs, thus preventing signal
transduction from an extracellular location (31) . In
particular, the Leporipoxvirus myxoma virus was found to
express a soluble IFN-
R homolog, denoted M-T7, which has the
ability to bind and inhibit the anti-viral activities of rabbit
IFN-
(31) . Here, we investigate the secretion and
inhibitory properties of M-T7, the myxoma soluble IFN-
R homolog,
in an attempt to further understand the role this viral protein plays
in combating IFN-
during the establishment of a virus infection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Viruses and Cells
vMyxlac, the myxoma virus
(strain Lausanne) derivative, has been previously
described(32) . Vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) was a generous
gift of D. Tovell. RK13 cells, a rabbit kidney cell line, and BGMK
cells, a primate cell line, were maintained in Dulbecco's Minimal
Essential medium with 10% newborn calf serum. Mouse L929 cells were
maintained in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. All cells were supplied by
the ATCC.
Purification of Myxoma M-T7 Protein
BGMK cells
were infected with vMyxlac virus at a multiplicity of infection
(m.o.i.) of 3. After extensive washing with phosphate-buffered saline
(PBS) to remove unabsorbed virus and serum, serum-free medium was
added, harvested 4 h later (early supernatant), replenished with
serum-free medium, and re-harvested 16 h post-infection (late
supernatant). Early and late supernatant samples were pooled and
subjected to ammonium sulfate fractionation, and proteins that
precipitated between 30 and 50% ammonium sulfate, which contained the
bulk of M-T7, were collected. Precipitated proteins were resuspended in
20 mM Bis-Tris, pH 6.0, loaded on a Q Sepharose Fast Flow
column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.), and eluted with a 0-300 mM sodium chloride gradient, in which M-T7 eluted in a broad peak
between 150 and 180 mM sodium chloride. Fractions containing
the M-T7 protein were identified by SDS-PAGE, pooled, precipitated with
50% ammonium sulfate, and desalted using an Econopac 10-DG column with
20 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, and 1 mM EDTA buffer. The
resulting M-T7 protein preparations were stored at 4 °C.
Analysis of Peptide Sequences
The Protein
Identification Resource (PIR) (Release 38) and GenBank
(Release 79) data bases were used to obtain the peptide sequences
of the mammalian IFN-
Rs and the poxviral IFN-
R homologs.
Peptide sequences were compared using Bestfit, PileUp, and LineUp
programs (Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI). All computer analyses
were performed at the Molecular Mechanisms in Growth Control Computer
Facility, University of Alberta.
Analysis of M-T7 Transcription
BGMK cells were
infected with vMyxlac virus at an m.o.i. of 30, and RNA from infected
cells was extracted at various time points post-infection using
guanidine thiocyanate, as described previously(33) . For
Northern blotting analysis, 3 µg of purified viral RNA was prepared
in MOPS buffer (20 mM MOPS, 5 mM sodium acetate, 1
mM EDTA) containing 50% deionized formamide and 20%
formaldehyde. Samples were incubated at 55 °C for 15 min, cooled on
ice, and loaded onto a 1% agarose gel containing 1
MOPS buffer,
2% formaldehyde, and 0.5 µg/ml ethidium bromide. RNA was
transferred to nitrocellulose via capillary action. For a probe, random
priming was performed using an 880-bp M-T7 PCR product with
[
-
P]dCTP (Amersham Corp.) and random primer
(Boehringer Mannheim). Results were visualized with autoradiography. For primer extension analysis, a 22-base oligonucleotide primer,
(5`-AAGTCGTAGGACGTAAGGCGTA-3`), was end-labeled using
[
-
P]ATP (ICN) and T4 kinase (Life
Technologies, Inc.). The primer was constructed to complement the M-T7
coding sequence, with its 3` end residing 52 bases downstream of the
initiating ATG. Primer extensions were performed as described in
Sambrook et al.(34) using 5 µg of viral RNA, and
Superscript reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.). DNA
sequencing was performed by adding one of four ddNTP mixtures (for
example, ddATP: 1 mM each dGTP, dTTP, dCTP, 0.5 mM dATP, 0.125 mM ddATP) to annealed RNA/primer, and
incubating at 55 °C for 45 min. All primer extension reactions were
subjected to sequencing gel analysis and visualized with
autoradiography.
Radiolabeling of Secreted Viral Proteins
BGMK
cells (6
10
/sample) were infected with vMyxlac
virus at an m.o.i. of 30. At 1.5 h (for labeling of early viral
proteins) or 8 h (for labeling of late viral proteins) post-infection,
cells were washed with PBS, pulsed for 30 min with 200 µCi of
[
S]Cys/Met (Translabel, ICN) in 400 µl of
cysteine/methionine-deficient medium (Life Technologies, Inc.), washed
three times to remove unincorporated label, and then placed in complete
medium. To detect labeled viral proteins secreted within the indicated
1-h time frame, complete medium was replaced with serum-free medium for
1 h prior to harvesting of labeled supernatants, with the exception of
the first time point of 2.5 h post-infection, in which case serum-free
medium was added for 30 min after labeling. To detect accumulated
labeled secreted viral proteins, cells were infected and labeled as
above, and serum-free medium was added to washed cells following
labeling. Cellular supernatants containing labeled, secreted viral
proteins were harvested at various time points post-infection,
centrifuged at 5000
g to remove cellular debris,
subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis, and visualized by autoradiography.
Quantitation of M-T7 Protein during Myxoma Virus
Infection
Following infection of BGMK cells with vMyxlac virus
(m.o.i. of 30), monolayers were washed to remove unabsorbed virus,
overlaid with serum-free medium, and supernatants containing secreted
proteins were harvested at various times post-infection. Supernatants
were centrifuged at 5000
g to remove cellular debris,
concentrated using Amicon Centriprep, subjected to SDS-PAGE analysis,
and visualized by silver staining. To quantitate the amount of M-T7
produced during myxoma virus infection, M-T7 bands were scanned using a
Chromoscan3 densitometer and quantitated using purified M-T7 standards.
Inhibitory units were defined as the amount of M-T7 (nanograms)
required to inhibit 1 unit of rabbit IFN-
, based on 50% inhibition
in a VSV inhibition bioassay.
Bioassay in Tissue Culture Cells
60-mm dishes
seeded to confluency with RK13 cells, BGMK cells, or L929 cells were
incubated overnight in medium containing purified rabbit, human, or
murine IFN-
(Genentech), respectively, with increasing amounts of
M-T7 protein. The next day, medium was removed, and monolayers were
infected with 100 plaque-forming units of VSV for 1 h, then overlaid
with 1% low melting point agarose in complete medium. The number of VSV
plaques were scored 24-48 h post-infection and compared with the
uninhibited control, in which cells were preincubated with only control
medium.
Competition Binding Assays
Rabbit, human, and
murine IFN-
were labeled in vitro with protein kinase A
and [
-
P]ATP, as described
previously(35) , with the exception that 5 µg of IFN-
were phosphorylated at 30 °C for 30 min. For competition binding
assays, 2 ng of
P-labeled IFN-
was incubated
simultaneously with increasing amounts of unlabeled competitor
IFN-
and 500 ng of M-T7 protein. Complexes formed at room
temperature within 1 h, at which time the cross-linking reagent
1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDAC, from Sigma), in
100 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.5, was added to 20
mM. The reaction was quenched 15 min later by the addition of
Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, to 0.1 M, and the resulting protein
complexes were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and visualized by autoradiography.
Solid Phase M-T7 Binding Assay
Falcon immunoplates
were coated overnight with 50 ng of M-T7 protein in 50 µl of PBS at
4 °C. The next day, wells were blocked at room temperature for 2 h
with 5% skim milk powder in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, followed by
binding of
P-labeled IFN-
in blocking buffer for 1 h.
Following three washes with PBS, the wells were removed and counted by
Cerenkov counting. To determine the specific binding of IFN-
to
M-T7, binding in the presence of 100-fold excess cold IFN-
was
subtracted from total binding. Nonspecific binding routinely
represented less than 5% of total binding. All assays were performed in
triplicate. Binding of
P-labeled IFN-
to M-T7 was
analyzed by the method of Scatchard(36) .
Binding of
P-Labeled Rabbit IFN-
to
RK13 Cells
Binding of rabbit IFN-
to RK13 cells in
monolayer culture was performed essentially as previously
described(37) . Briefly, 1
10
RK13 cells
seeded in 24-well dishes were washed with ice-cold serum-free medium,
followed by the addition of increasing amounts of
P-labeled IFN-
in 100 µl of serum-free medium,
either alone or in the presence of 100-fold excess of unlabeled
IFN-
. The cultures were incubated at 4 °C with gentle rocking
for 1 h, at which time the monolayers were washed three times with PBS
to remove unbound
P-labeled IFN-
. Cells were removed
with 0.15 M sodium chloride and 0.015 M sodium
citrate, and the radioactivity in the samples was determined by
Cerenkov counting. All assays were performed in triplicate.
P-labeled IFN-
binding to RK13 cells was analyzed by
the method of Scatchard(36) .
RESULTS
Comparison of Poxviral IFN-
Receptor
Homologs
The Leporipoxvirus myxoma virus was recently
shown to encode and express a 37-kDa soluble protein, designated M-T7,
containing significant homology to the ligand binding domain of the
human and murine IFN-
receptors(31) . Shope fibroma virus
(SFV), a Leporipoxvirus closely related to myxoma virus, also
encodes a similar IFN-
receptor homolog, designated
S-T7(31) . As the genomic sequence information from a variety
of other poxviruses
accumulates(38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43) ,
additional putative viral IFN-
receptor homologs have been
discovered (reviewed in (44) ). Included are the Orthopoxvirus vaccinia virus (B8R) and variola virus (B8R in
strain Bangladesh-1975 and B9R in India-1967) (38, 41, 43) proteins, and the Suipoxvirus swinepox virus C6L protein(40) . Fig. 1illustrates the amino acid alignment of the five known
poxviral IFN-
receptor homologs with the two known mammalian
IFN-
receptors. Although the overall identity scores between the
poxviral proteins and the ligand binding domain of the mammalian
IFN-
Rs is low (20-25%), it is important to note the
conservation of cysteine residues, which for the mammalian IFN-
Rs
have been shown to be essential for ligand binding by stabilizing
disulfide bonds(45, 46) . As highlighted in Fig. 1, the myxoma M-T7, SFV S-T7, and swinepox C6L proteins
contain all 8 conserved cysteine residues, while the vaccinia and
variola B8R proteins have the first 2 cysteine residues replaced with
tyrosine residues, while a single cysteine residue is situated at a
unique site four amino acids NH
-terminal to cysteine 3 (Fig. 1). Note that all of the poxviral proteins lack
transmembrane domains and are predicted to be secreted proteins. Thus,
the poxviral IFN-
binding proteins are uniformly shorter than
their mammalian receptor homologs and possess neither hydrophobic
membrane-spanning domains nor cytoplasmic signaling domains required to
initiate an IFN-
signal transduction event.
Figure 1:
Alignment of soluble poxviral IFN-
receptor homologs with the cellular mammalian IFN-
receptors.
Amino acid sequence alignment of myxoma virus M-T7 (31) with
the peptide sequences of four putative poxviral IFN-
R homologs,
Shope fibroma virus S-T 7(63) , swinepox virus SPV
C6L(40) , vaccinia virus B8R (VV-B8R)(64) ,
and variola virus Bangladesh-1975 B8R (VAR-B8R)(41) ,
and the cellular murine (MuIFNR) (5) , and human (HuIFNR) (4) IFN-
Rs. Boxes indicate
amino acid identity among all proteins, while the asterisk (*)
denotes amino acids which are conserved in at least four of the seven
proteins. The disulfide-forming cysteine residues conserved between the
mammalian and viral proteins are both boxed and numbered
1-8. The arrow indicates the location of the
NH
-terminal residue, determined by sequencing, of the
mature secreted myxoma M-T7 protein, while the predicted transmembrane
domains of the mammalian IFN-
Rs are underlined. The
full-length of the human and murine IFN-
Rs are 489 and 477 amino
acids, respectively. Accession numbers (EMBL Data Library) for the
receptors are myxoma (M81919), swinepox (L22013), vaccinia strain
Copenhagen (M35027), variola strain Bangladesh 1975 (L22579), human
(A31555), and murine (M26711).
M-T7 Is Expressed from a Relatively Stable mRNA from an
Early Poxviral Promoter
The myxoma 37-kDa M-T7 protein was
previously observed to be the major viral protein detected in medium
harvested from infected cells at both early and late times of
infection(31) . Since some poxviral proteins, such as the
7.5-kDa polypeptide of vaccinia, are expressed constitutively during
infection due to the presence of overlapping early and late
promoters(47) , it was of interest to examine the kinetics of
M-T7 expression. Northern blotting analysis, using a radiolabeled M-T7
probe, demonstrates that a single M-T7 mRNA transcript of approximately
1.1 kb from myxoma virus-infected cells peaks at early times (Fig. 2, lanes 2 and 3), but is still
detectable at late times (lanes 4 and 5). Primer
extension analysis confirms the results of the Northern blot analysis, i.e. a defined extended product can be clearly detected with
RNA collected at early times post-infection (Fig. 3a, lanes 3 and 4), but is still observed at late times
post-infection (lanes 5 and 6). By combining the
primer extension reaction with dideoxy sequencing, we mapped the
5`-initiation sites of the M-T7 transcript to a sequence motif with all
the elements of a strong poxviral early promoter (Fig. 3, b and c). In contrast, the highly conserved TAAAT motif
characteristically observed in most poxviral late promoters (48) is absent. Vaccinia virus early promoters (Fig. 3c) typically include a 16-base pair (bp)
critical region, followed by a T-rich 11-bp spacer and a 7-bp
initiation region, where transcript start sites are clustered at purine
residues(49) . The M-T7 critical region is highly homologous to
the critical region experimentally engineered in vaccinia virus (49) to be substantially stronger than natural early promoters (Fig. 3c). Transcription of M-T7 predominantly
initiates at a single purine (adenine) 10 nucleotides upstream of the
ATG, although three surrounding bases are also used in initiation, to a
lesser extent (refer to Fig. 3, b and c).
Furthermore, no evidence of a 5`-poly(A) leader, characteristic of
poxviral late mRNAs (48) , was detected when primer extensions
were performed with mRNA collected at early or late times (data not
shown). Thus, the abundance of the M-T7 protein secreted throughout
myxoma virus infection is not due to constitutive transcription, but
rather because M-T7 mRNA is expressed early as a relatively stable
viral message that is still detectable at late times of infection.
Figure 2:
Northern blot analysis of M-T7 transcripts
from myxoma virus infected cells. RNA from mock infected BGMK cells (lane 1) and myxoma virus (multiplicity of infection =
30) infected cells harvested at the indicated times post-infection (lanes 2-5) was subjected to Northern blot analysis
using a radiolabeled M-T7 probe, as described under ``Materials
and Methods.'' RNA marker sizes are indicated to the left.
Figure 3:
Primer extension analysis of the 5` end of
the M-T7 gene. a, hybridization of a
P-end-labeled oligonucleotide to RNA from mock infected
cells (lane 2) and myxoma virus infected cells harvested at
the indicated times post-infection (lanes 2-6). Size
markers at the left are HinfII cut
X174. b, dideoxy sequencing reaction using the same oligonucleotide
primer as in A, using RNA harvested 4 h post-infection. Lane 2 is a control extension reaction in which no
dideoxynucleotide is used, while the dideoxynucleotide used in each
remaining reaction is indicated above the figure (lanes
3-6). Sequence of the extended product (non-coding strand)
is illustrated on the right, with the asterisk (*) indicating
the intensity of the run-off positions. The boxed nucleotides
correspond to the ATG of the coding strand. c, promoter region
upstream of the M-T7 start site (see text for details). Procedures are
described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The vaccinia
consensus motifs are from Davison and
Moss(49) .
M-T7 Is Efficiently Secreted as a Stable Soluble
Protein
Since M-T7 is expressed from a typical early poxviral
gene, and yet is the major secreted protein observed in supernatants
harvested at both early and late times of a myxoma virus infection (31) , we next studied the kinetics of protein secretion from
myxoma virus-infected cells. Both the kinetics of M-T7 secretion and
the stability of the secreted M-T7 protein were assayed by infecting
cells with myxoma virus, pulse labeling with
[
S]Cys/Met, and then following the fate of the
labeled M-T7 protein. To determine the kinetics of M-T7 protein
secretion during myxoma virus infection, we labeled proteins
1.5-2 h post-infection, when M-T7 mRNA transcripts are abundant
(refer to Fig. 2), then followed the secretion of proteins
translated within this labeling period. Fig. 4a demonstrates
that the transit time for M-T7 is greater than 30 min (lane 2),
but less than 4 h (lane 4). Within 4 h of translation, almost
all of the M-T7 has been secreted (compare lanes 3 and 4). Cellular supernatants from myxoma virus infected cells
which had been labeled with [
S]Cys/Met at 8 h
post-infection, washed, and then harvested 2 h later, confirmed that
M-T7 is secreted at early times, and although M-T7 mRNA is still
readily detectable at these times (Fig. 2), secreted protein is
not (Fig. 4a, lane 7). Analysis of the levels
of total accumulated proteins following myxoma virus infection (Fig. 4b) demonstrates no significant reduction in the
levels of intact M-T7 protein, indicating that the soluble mature form
of M-T7 is particularly stable. Thus, we conclude that M-T7 is
expressed as an early gene product which is secreted within 4 h of
translation, but persists as a stable soluble protein well into late
times of infection. Indeed, we have been unable to detect any
significant degradation of mature M-T7 protein even after several days
at 37 °C in unfractionated supernatants (data not shown).
Figure 4:
Kinetics of viral protein secretion from
myxoma virus infected cells. a,
S-labeled
proteins secreted from mock infected cells (lane 1) and myxoma
virus-infected cells (lanes 2-7), were measured as
outlined under ``Materials and Methods.'' At various times
post-infection, proteins secreted within a 1-h time frame ending at the
indicated times were harvested. All samples were labeled with
[
S]Cys/Met for 30 min at 1.5 h post-infection,
with the exception of lane 7, where labeling was initiated 8 h
post-infection. b, accumulation of
S-labeled
proteins secreted from mock infected cells (lane 1) and myxoma
virus-infected cells at the indicated times post-infection (lanes
2-5), as outlined under ``Materials and Methods.''
The location of the myxoma M-T7 protein is indicated to the right, while the location of size markers is indicated to the left.
Quantitation of M-T7 Protein from Infected
Cells
In order for M-T7 to play a significant role in the
inhibition of host derived IFN-
, sufficient amounts of the soluble
IFN-
R homolog to outcompete cellular receptors must be secreted by
myxoma virus during infection. Quantitation of M-T7 secreted at various
times during myxoma virus infection demonstrated that, indeed, the
amounts of M-T7 secreted vastly exceeds the number of cellular
IFN-
Rs at the cell surface (Table 1). In accordance with the
kinetic studies outlined above, the majority of M-T7 is secreted by 4 h
post-infection, with a slight increase in accumulation seen until 8 h
post-infection, at which time the total amount of M-T7 slowly
decreases. While the amount of IFN-
produced locally during viral
infection has yet to be determined, the amount of M-T7 produced per
cell is significant when compared to the level of IFN-
Rs expressed
on cell membranes. IFN-
receptive cells are known to express
200-25,000 IFN-
Rs per cell (3) , which even at the
maximal level of expression is three orders of magnitude less than the
amount of M-T7 secreted by 4 h post-infection. Furthermore,
quantitation of the inhibitory potential of M-T7 demonstrated that
10
cells secrete sufficient M-T7 to neutralize
2000-3000 units of rabbit IFN-
(Table 1). Thus,
biologically significant amounts of M-T7 are produced during a myxoma
virus infection.
M-T7 Is a Specific Inhibitor of Rabbit
IFN-
Previously, we showed that M-T7 was extremely
efficient in abrogating the antiviral state induced by rabbit IFN-
on RK13 cells(31) . To determine the specificity of M-T7
binding, we pretreated rabbit, murine, and primate cell lines with
sufficient cognate IFN-
to induce the antiviral state, either in
the presence or absence of M-T7 protein. Following pretreatment, cells
were infected with VSV, and virus yield was calculated as the
percentage of plaque formation compared to cells pretreated with
neither IFN-
nor M-T7. As shown in Table 2, as the molar
ratio of M-T7 incubated with rabbit IFN-
on RK-13 cells is
increased, the extent of induction of the antiviral state becomes
progressively inhibited, thus permitting replication of the VSV to 100%
of uninhibited controls. However, with primate and murine cells
pretreated with human and murine IFN-
, respectively, increasing
amounts of M-T7 did not decrease induction of the antiviral state, and
the VSV yield in each case remained essentially unchanged. Thus, M-T7
is species-specific and can prevent the induction of the antiviral
state induced by rabbit IFN-
, but not human or murine IFN-
.
To further confirm that the species-specific ability of myxoma M-T7
protein to inhibit the biological activity of IFN-
, a series of
competition binding assays, as assessed by the chemical cross-linking
of M-T7 to radiolabeled IFN-
, were performed. The 37-kDa M-T7
protein readily binds to
P-labeled rabbit IFN-
,
forming a complex which migrates with an apparent molecular mass of
48-50 kDa. As shown in Fig. 5a, lane 6,
M-T7
IFN-
complexes and small amounts of higher molecular
mass complexes are observed in these cross-linking assays, along with
IFN-
monomers, dimers, and trimers, which are commonly observed in
cross-linking assays involving radiolabeled IFN-
(50) .
However, with the addition of increasing amounts of unlabeled
competitor rabbit IFN-
, only the intensity of the
M-T7
IFN-
complex decreases, and at higher cold competitor
ratios IFN-
trimers, which co-migrate with M-T7
IFN-
heterodimers, become more prominent. If unlabeled human or murine
IFN-
are substituted as the cold competitor (Fig. 5, b and c, respectively), the amount of the labeled
M-T7
IFN-
complex does not decrease, even at 500
molar excess. We have also been unable to detect significant amounts of
cross-linked M-T7
IFN-
complex when murine or human IFN-
is used as the radiolabeled ligand (not shown). Thus, human and murine
IFN-
cannot compete with rabbit IFN-
for binding to M-T7,
further contributing to the observation that M-T7 has evolved to
specifically inhibit rabbit IFN-
.
Figure 5:
Competition studies involving chemical
cross-linking of
P-labeled rabbit IFN-
to the myxoma
M-T7 protein. Competition assays of
P-labeled rabbit
IFN-
to M-T7 were performed as described under ``Materials
and Methods'' in the presence of increasing molar excess of
unlabeled rabbit IFN-
(Panel a), human IFN-
(Panel b), and murine IFN-
(Panel c). The fold
excess of unlabeled IFN-
used as competitor is indicated at the top. The locations of monomer (M) and dimer (D) forms of the labeled IFN-
, as well as the
heterodimeric complex formed between rabbit IFN-
and M-T7, are
indicated on the right. Higher molecular mass bands of
complexes containing IFN-
are also visible. IFN-
trimers
co-migrate with M-T7/IFN-
heterodimers(50) . The locations
of SDS-PAGE markers are shown on the left.
Scatchard Analysis of M-T7 Binding to Rabbit
IFN-
To quantitate the affinity of M-T7 for rabbit
IFN-
, solid phase binding assays were performed, followed by
Scatchard analysis. Saturable binding was observed between M-T7 and
P-labeled rabbit IFN-
, while no binding could be
observed with either radiolabeled human or murine IFN-
(Fig. 6a). Scatchard analysis of the binding data yielded a
linear plot, consistent with a single affinity binding site, with a
dissociation constant (K
) of 1.2
10
M and correlation coefficient of
-0.93 (Fig. 6b). Since the K
of binding of rabbit IFN-
with the cognate rabbit cellular
receptor had not previously been reported, binding of IFN-
to
intact rabbit kidney (RK-13) cells was also measured. Saturable binding
was observed with rabbit IFN-
, but not with human or murine
IFN-
(Fig. 7a). Scatchard analysis of the binding
curve for rabbit IFN-
gave a linear plot, with a K
of 5.9
10
M and correlation
coefficient of -0.97 (Fig. 7b).
Figure 6:
Solid phase equilibrium binding analysis
of
P-labeled IFN-
to M-T7. a, solid phase
binding analysis of the myxoma M-T7 protein with
P-labeled
rabbit IFN-
(
), [
P] human IFN-
(
), and
P-labeled murine IFN-
(+), as
outlined under ``Materials and Methods.'' b,
Scatchard analysis of the binding curve of
P-labeled
rabbit IFN-
and M-T7.
Figure 7:
Equilibrium binding analysis of
P-labeled IFN-
to the rabbit IFN-
cellular
receptor. a, solid phase binding analysis of
P-labeled rabbit IFN-
(
),
P-labeled human IFN-
(
), and
P-labeled murine IFN-
(
) to the rabbit
IFN-
receptor on intact rabbit RK13 cells, as outlined under
``Materials and Methods.'' b, Scatchard analysis of
the binding curve of
P-labeled rabbit IFN-
to the
RK13 cellular receptor.
DISCUSSION
IFN-
is a critical regulator of the immune system,
particularly during the response to pathogenic challenge(3) .
The importance of IFN-
in the response to poxvirus infections has
been amply
demonstrated(19, 20, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55) ,
and thus mechanisms to combat the anti-viral effects of IFN-
would
clearly be advantageous for virus survival in vertebrate hosts. Myxoma
virus, a Leporipoxvirus, was the first virus shown to have
evolved a strategy to overcome the affects of the IFN-
ligand
prior to receptor engagement(31) , by elaborating a bona
fide soluble homolog of the mammalian IFN-
Rs, named
M-T7(31) . Recently, soluble IFN
R homologs have also been
described in a variety of other poxviruses, including SFV, vaccinia
virus, variola virus, and swinepox
virus(31, 38, 40, 42, 43) .
While the poxviral IFN
R homologs all contain significant homology
to the mammalian IFN
R ligand binding domain, the overall extent of
homology with the entire sequence of the two known mammalian receptors
is relatively low. Interestingly, the percent identity between
IFN
R homologs of different poxviral genera (ortho-, lepori- and
sui-poxviruses) is equally low. However, conservation of the eight
cysteine residues believed critical for forming stabilizing disulfide
bonds (46, 56) is observed, although the vaccinia and
variola homologs are noticeably missing the first two of the eight
conserved cysteine residues (Fig. 1)(44) . It will be
useful to ascertain if these two orthopoxvirus homologs have altered
ligand binding properties compared with other members of the receptor
family.
The mammalian IFN-
Rs, through cooperation of the ligand
binding and signal transducing accessory components, have been shown to
possess strict species specificity for both ligand binding and
ligand-dependent signaling. Since myxoma virus is known to have evolved
in the tapeti, or South American brush rabbit, it was of interest to
deduce whether the myxoma M-T7-soluble receptor homolog might possess
the same strict species specificity toward ligand binding. Here we show
that M-T7 is highly specific in binding to and abrogating the
anti-viral effects of rabbit IFN-
, and cannot bind or inhibit
human or murine IFN-
. Similar results have been found with the
myxoma virus tumor necrosis factor receptor homolog(57) , which
inhibits rabbit tumor necrosis factor
in a species specific
manner, similar to that of M-T7. This observation suggests that
different poxvirus IFN-
receptor homologs will have ligand
specificities that reflect the vertebrate host(s) in which each virus
has uniquely evolved. Furthermore, the ligand binding properties of
soluble poxviral IFN-
R homologs would be predicted to be similar
to their mammalian counterparts. We show here that M-T7 binds its
ligand with a K
comparable to the soluble
mammalian receptors. Moreover, upon characterization of the rabbit RK13
high affinity IFN-
cellular receptor, which has a K
value similar to the human and murine cellular IFN-
Rs, we
demonstrate that M-T7 binding to its ligand, as with mammalian soluble
receptor binding, is an order of magnitude lower than that observed
with the intact cellular receptor complexes(46, 56) .
Analysis of the interaction of IFN-
with secreted versions of
the mammalian IFN-
Rs, described above, has demonstrated that the
extracellular ligand binding domain is sufficient for IFN-
binding (46) . Naturally occurring and engineered forms of soluble
IFN-
Rs possess immunomodulatory properties consistent with
IFN-
inhibition, presumably by binding and effectively
sequestering the ligand away from its membrane bound
receptor(46, 56, 58, 59) . Viral
IFN-
R homologs presumably abrogate the effects of IFN-
in the
same fashion. In order for myxoma virus to successfully inhibit
IFN-
, sufficient amounts of M-T7 must be secreted during viral
infection. Indeed, we found that biologically significant amounts of
M-T7 were expressed, with respect to both the amount of M-T7 produced
and its inhibitory capacity, confirming the original observation that
M-T7 is a bona fide IFN-
R homolog.
By virtue of the
amount of M-T7 expressed during myxoma virus infection, it is feasible
to suggest that this abundance is a reflection of the relative
importance of IFN-
as an anti-viral cytokine. M-T7 is expressed as
a typical early poxvirus gene product, and is efficiently secreted and
extremely stable as an extracellular protein. We suspect that selection
pressures on myxoma virus for replication in rabbits has resulted in
efficient shuttling of high amounts of M-T7 through cellular secretory
pathways, but further experiments are required in order to determine
whether this represents an accelerated secretion profile or simply a
strict absence of any Golgi/endoplasmic reticulum retention signals in
the M-T7 protein itself.
Aside from IFN-
R homologs, poxviruses
encode proteins with homologies to a number of different cytokine
receptors(29, 38, 41, 60, 61) .
The origin of these viral cytokine receptor genes remains unproven, but
it is likely that either an ancestral poxvirus acquired a progenitor
cytokine binding function which subsequently evolved to mimic the
ligand binding specificity of the host, or that individual poxviruses
have acquired cytokine binding genes independently from their
respective hosts. Myxoma virus is one of the few poxviruses for which
the evolutionary host, the South American brush rabbit (Sylvilagus
brasiliensis), has been clearly established (62) .
However, the exact evolutionary relationship between M-T7 and the
rabbit IFN-
R must await the cloning and sequencing of the rabbit
receptor(s). In conclusion, this work strongly suggests that careful
analysis of the interaction between the poxviral IFN-
Rs and
IFN-
ligands from a variety of vertebrate hosts will shed light on
the evolutionary origins of poxviruses whose natural histories are
still obscure.
FOOTNOTES
- *
- This work was funded by the
National Cancer Institute of Canada. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This
article must therefore by hereby marked
``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
- §
- Supported by studentships from Medical Research
Council and Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research.
- ¶
- Current address: Dept. of Microbiology and
Biochemistry, University of Victoria, P.O. Box 3055, Victoria, British
Columbia, V8W 3P6, Canada.
- **
- Medical Scientist
of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. To whom
correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. Tel.:
403-492-2080; Fax: 403-492-9556.
- (
) - Abbreviations
used are IFN-
, interferon-
; IFN-
R, interferon-
receptor; VSV, vesicular stomatitis virus; m.o.i., multiplicity of
infection; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; SFV, Shope fibroma virus;
bp, base pair; MOPS, 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid;
Bis-Tris,
2-[bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino]-2-(hydroxymethyl)-propane-1,3-diol;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Dr. C. Spencer for helpful discussions and
advice concerning RNA analysis, Dr. I. Martin and Dr. F. Boess for
invaluable help with Scatchard analysis, and R. Maranchuk for excellent
technical assistance.
REFERENCES
- Vilcek, J., Gray, P. W., Rinderknecht, E., and Sevastopoulos, C. G. (1985) Lymphokines 11, 1-32
- Epstein, L. B. (1984) in Interferon (Vil c ek, J., and deMaeyer, E., eds) pp. 185-220, Elsevier, Amsterdam
- Farrar, M. A., and Schreiber, R. D. (1993) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11, 571-611
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Aguet, M., Dembic, Z., and Merlin, G. (1988) Cell 55, 273-280
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gray, P. W., Leong, S., Fennie, E. H., Farrar, M. A., Pingel, J. T., Fernandez-Luna, J., and Schreiber, R. D. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 8497-8501
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Soh, J., Donnelly, R. J., Kotenko, S., Mariano, T. M., Cook, J. R., Wang, N., Emanuel, S., Schwartz, B., Miki, T., and Pestka, S. (1994) Cell 76, 793-802
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hemmi, S., Bohni, R., Stark, G., DiMarco, F., and Aguet, M. (1994) Cell 76, 803-810
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dalton, D. K., Pitts-Meek, S., Keshav, S., Figari, I. S., Bradley, A., and Stewart, T. A. (1993) Science 259, 1739-1742
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Huang, S., Hendriks, W., Althage, A., Hemmi, S., Bluethmann, H., Kamijo, R., Vilcek, J., Zinkernagel, R. M., and Aguet, M. (1993) Science 259, 1742-1745
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kerr, I. M., and Stark, G. R. (1991) FEBS Lett. 285, 194-198
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Williams, B. R. G. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 200, 1-11
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Farrell, P. J., Balkow, K., Hunt, T., and Jackson, R. (1977) Cell 11, 187-200
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kerr, I. M., and Brown, R. E. (1978) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 75, 256-260
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schreiber, R. D., Pace, J. L., Russell, S. W., Altman, A., and Katz, D. H. (1983) J. Immunol. 131, 826-832
[Abstract]
- Schreiber, R. D., and Celada, A. (1985) Lymphokines 11, 87-118
- Pestka, S., and Baron, S. (1981) Methods Enzymol. 78, 3-14
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Liew, F. Y., Li, Y., and Millott, S. (1990) J. Immunol. 145, 4306-4310
[Abstract]
- Ding, A. H., Nathan, C. F., and Stuehr, D. J. (1988) J. Immunol. 141, 2407-2412
[Abstract]
- Karupiah, G., Xie, Q., Buller, R. M. L., Nathan, C., Duarte, C., and MacMicking, J. D. (1993) Science 261, 1445-1448
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Melkova, Z., and Esteban, M. (1994) Virology 198, 731-735
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Basham, T. Y., and Merigan, T. C. (1983) J. Immunol. 130, 1492-1494
[Abstract]
- Basham, T. Y., Nickoloff, B. J., Merigan, T. C., and Morhenn, V. B. (1985) J. Interferon Res. 5, 23-32
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- McFadden, G., and Kane, K. (1994) Adv. Cancer Res. 63, 117-209
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fischer, D. G., Tal, N., Novick, D., Barak, S., and Rubinstein, M. (1993) Science 262, 250-253
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gooding, L. R. (1992) Cell 71, 5-7
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kerr, I. M., and Stark, G. R. (1992) J. Interferon Res. 12, 237-240
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- McNair, A. N. B., and Kerr, I. M. (1993) Pharmacol. & Ther. 56, 79-95
- Marrack, P., and Kappler, J. (1994) Cell 76, 323-332
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Smith, G. L. (1994) Trends Microbiol. 2, 81-88
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Moss, B. (1990) in Virology (Fields, B., and Knipe, D. M., eds) 2nd ed., pp. 2079-2111, Raven Press, New York
- Upton, C., Mossman, K., and McFadden, G. (1992) Science 258, 1369-1372
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Opgenorth, A., Graham, K., Nation, N., Strayer, D., and McFadden, G. (1992) J. Virol. 66, 4720-4731
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Macaulay, C., Upton, C., and McFadden, G. (1987) Virology 158, 381-393
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
- Kung, H., and Bekesi, E. (1986) Methods Enzymol. 119, 296-301
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Scatchard, G. (1949) Ann. N. Y. Acad. 51, 660-672
[CrossRef]
- Zoon, K. C., Nedden, D. Z., and Arnheiter, H. (1986) Methods Enzymol. 119, 312-315
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Goebel, S. J., Johnson, G. P., Perkus, M. E., Davis, S. W., Winslow, J. P., and Paoletti, E. (1990) Virology 179, 247-266
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Smith, G. L., Chan, Y. S., and Howard, S. T. (1991) J. Gen. Virol. 72, 1349-1376
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Massung, R. F., Jayarama, V., and Moyer, R. W. (1993) Virology 197, 511-528
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Massung, R. F., Esposito, J. J., Liu, L., Qi, J., Utterback, T. R., Knight, J. C., Aubin, L., Yuran, T. E., Parsons, J. M., Loparev, V. N., Selivanov, N. A., Cavallaro, K. F., Kerlavage, A. R., Mahy, B. W. J., and Venter, J. C. (1993) Nature 366, 748-750
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Massung, R. F., Liu, L., Qi, J., Knight, J. C., Yuran, T. E., Kerlavage, A. R., Parsons, J. M., Venter, J. C., and Esposito, J. J. (1994) Virology 201, 215-240
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shchelkunov, S. N., Blinov, V. M., and Sandakhchiev, L. S. (1993) FEBS Lett. 319, 80-83
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Mossman, K., Barry, M., and McFadden, G. (1995) in Viroceptors, Virokines and Related Immune Modulators Encoded by DNA Viruses (McFadden, G., ed) pp. 41-54, R. G. Landes Co., Austin, TX
- Garotta, G., Ozmen, L., Fountoulakis, M., Dembic, Z., van Loon, A. P. G. M., and Stuber, D. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 6908-6915
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fountoulakis, M., Juranville, J.-F., Stuber, D., Weibel, E. K., and Garotta, G. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 13268-13275
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Cochran, M. A., Puckett, C., and Moss, B. (1985) J. Virol. 54, 30-37
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Davison, A. J., and Moss, B. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 210, 771-784
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Davison, A. J., and Moss, B. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 210, 749-769
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Upton, C., and McFadden, G. (1994) in Methods in Molecular Genetics (Adolph, K. W., ed) Vol. 4, pp. 383-390, Academic Press, New York
- Buller, R. L. M., and Palumbo, G. J. (1991) Microbiol. Rev. 55, 80-122
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Karupiah, G., Fredrickson, T. N., Holmes, K. L., Khairallah, L. H., and Buller, R. M. L. (1993) J. Virol. 67, 4214-4226
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kohonen-Corish, M. R. J., King, N. J. C., Woodhams, C. E., and Ramshaw, I. A. (1990) Eur. J. Immunol. 20, 157-161
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ramshaw, I., Ruby, J., Ramsay, A., Ada, G., and Karupiah, G. (1992) Immunol. Rev. 127, 157-182
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ruby, J., and Ramshaw, I. (1991) Lymphokine Cytokine Res. 10, 353-358
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fountoulakis, M., Schlaeger, E. J., Gentz, R., Juranville, J. F., Manneberg, M., Ozmen, L., and Garotta, G. (1991) Eur. J. Biochem. 198, 441-450
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schreiber, M., and McFadden, G. (1994) Virology 204, 692-705
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Novick, D., Engelmann, H., Wallach, D., and Rubinstein, M. (1989) J. Exp. Med. 170, 1409-1414
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Ozmen, L., Fountoulakis, M., Gentz, R., and Garotta, G. (1993) Int. Rev. Exp. Pathol. 34B, 137-147
- McFadden, G., and Graham, K. (1994) Semin. Virol. , in press
- Spriggs, M. K. (1994) Virus Res. 33, 1-10
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fenner, F., and Ratcliffe, F. N. (1965) Myxomatosis , Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
- Upton, C., and McFadden, G. (1986) Virology 152, 308-321
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Howard, S. T., Chan, Y. C., and Smith, G. L. (1991) Virology 180, 633-647
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1995 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg