JBC Origene Your Gene Company

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bougeret, Céc.
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bougeret, Céc.
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 13, Issue of March 29, 1996 pp. 7465-7472
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Detection of a Physical and Functional Interaction between Csk and Lck Which Involves the SH2 Domain of Csk and Is Mediated by Autophosphorylation of Lck on Tyrosine 394 (*)

(Received for publication, May 15, 1995; and in revised form, November 16, 1995)

Cécile Bougeret (1), (§),  Thierry Delaunay (2),  Francisco Romero (3), (¶),  Pascale Jullien (1),  Hisataka Sabe (4), (**),  Hidesaburo Hanafusa (4),  Richard Benarous (1),  Siegmund Fischer (3)

From the  (1)From INSERM U332, Institut Cochin de Génétique Moléculaire/Université Paris V-René Descartes, 22 rue Méchain, 75014 Paris, France, (2)INRA, Laboratoire de Virologie et Immunologie Moléculaires, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France, (3)INSERM U363, Institut Cochin de Génétique Moléculaire/Université Paris V-René Descartes, 75014 Paris, France, and (4)Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, the Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES

ABSTRACT

The COOH-terminal Src kinase (Csk) is responsible for the phosphorylation of the conserved, negative regulatory, carboxyl-terminal tyrosine of most of the Src family protein tyrosine kinases. Up to now, no stable binding of Csk to Src kinases has been detected. We therefore decided to analyze this interaction using two systems which allow detection of transient interaction. We produced and purified recombinant proteins in the glutathione S-transferase prokaryotic expression system. First, using real-time biospecific interaction analysis (BIAcore), we detected in vitro a specific interaction between Csk and one of its substrates Lck, a lymphocyte-specific member of the Src family. This interaction requires the autophosphorylation of Lck on tyrosine 394 (the phosphorylation of which is correlated with an increase of the kinase activity) and involves a functional Csk SH2 domain. Second, using the yeast two-hybrid system, we confirmed in vivo the physical interaction between Csk and Lck. Furthermore, in vitro we showed that autophosphorylation of Lck on tyrosine 394 enhances the phosphorylation of Lck by Csk on the negative regulatory site, tyrosine 505, suggesting that activated Lck serves preferentially as substrate for Csk. These findings might explain the mechanism(s) by which Csk interacts with most of Src kinases to down-regulate their kinase activity.

INTRODUCTION

The protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs) (^1)of the Src family are nonreceptor kinases which are involved in cell proliferation and differentiation. This family comprises nine proto-oncogenes: c-src, c-yes, fyn, lyn, lck, blk, hck, c-fgr, yrk(1) . The kinase activity of Src PTKs is regulated by phosphorylation of two highly conserved tyrosine (Tyr) residues. One of these residues, located in the catalytic domain, is involved in positive regulation of the kinase activity upon autophosphorylation(2) . Contrary to their viral counterparts, the products of the cellular genes have their activity repressed by phosphorylation of their COOH-terminal Tyr (3) which probably generates a binding domain for their own Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, thereby placing the molecule in an inactive conformation(4, 5) . A widely expressed PTK isolated initially by Okada and Nakagawa in 1988, Csk, has been shown in vitro to phosphorylate the negative regulatory Tyr of c-Src(6, 7) , Lyn, Fyn(8) , Lck(9) , and c-Fgr (10) .

Csk is related to Src PTKs but does not contain a myristylation site, or the conserved autophosphorylated Tyr and the regulatory COOH-terminal Tyr(6, 11) . Thus, the mechanism by which Csk function is regulated is not known. Similar to Src kinases, Csk contains one SH3 and one SH2 domain, which both are found in a number of catalytic and non catalytic signal transduction molecules and mediate protein-protein interactions(12) . In Src kinases, the SH2 domain is considered to be involved in the intramolecular suppression of the kinase activity (4, 5) and in the binding to sequence specific tyrosine phosphorylated proteins(13, 14) , whereas the SH3 domain is involved in the recruitment of substrates containing proline-rich sequences(15) .

Several systems provide evidence for the involvement of Csk in the regulation of cell activation through down-regulation of Src PTKs. Thus in vivo, (i) overexpression of Csk in v-Crk/c-Src transformed fibroblast cells causes reversion to normal phenotype(16) , (ii) overexpression of Csk in a T cell line inhibits TcR-induced tyrosine protein phosphorylation and lymphokine production(17) , (iii) the kinase activity of Lyn is constitutively activated in Csk-negative B-cell clones(18) , and (iv) coexpression of Csk counteracts cell death caused by expression of c-Src in Schizosaccharomyces pombe(19) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae(20) . Furthermore, Csk-deficient mouse embryos are developmentally arrested at the somite stage, and the kinase activity of several members of the Src family is greatly enhanced in these embryos(21, 22) .

Although Src is a substrate of Csk, no stable binding of Csk to c-Src or v-Src has been detected(11, 23) . Therefore, we postulated that the binding of Src PTKs to Csk must be transient with a rapid off-rate, and decided to study the interaction between Csk and one of its substrate Lck, a Src PTK involved in T cell signaling(24) , using real-time biospecific interaction analysis (BIAcore)(25) . Toward this end, we produced recombinant Csk and Lck proteins in bacteria using the glutathione S-transferase (GST) expression system (26) . We demonstrated that Csk interacts physically with Lck through its SH2 domain and that this interaction requires the phosphorylation of Tyr of Lck. We confirmed the interaction between Csk and Lck in vivo using the yeast two-hybrid system which also allows to detect transient interaction(27) . Furthermore, through in vitro phosphorylation assays, we demonstrated that Lck phosphorylation on Tyr by Csk is enhanced by autophosphorylation of Lck on Tyr.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Expression and Purification of GST Fusion Proteins

Wild-type (WT) full-length or point-mutated (Y394F and Y505F) full-length or point-mutated (K273E) deleted from the first 33 amino acid residues human LCK cDNAs were subcloned in the pGEX-2T prokaryotic expression system as described previously(28) . Wild-type full-length or wild-type deleted (SH3 domain, SH2 domain, and SH3/SH2 domains) rat csk cDNAs (29) and mutated (S108C) deleted (SH2 domain) chicken csk cDNAs (30) were subcloned in the pGEX-2T vector. The expression and purification of GST fusion proteins were performed as described elsewhere(29) . Purified proteins were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and the concentrations of the recombinant proteins were estimated by Coomassie Blue staining.

Analysis of the Csk-Lck Interaction with the BIAcore

The principle of operation of the BIAcore biosensor (Pharmacia BIOsensor AB, Uppsala, Sweden) has been described previously(25) . Purified Csk (without GST) was immobilized within the flow-cell matrix as described previously (31) at concentrations yielding 2,500-5,000 resonance units (RU) which corresponds to 2.5-5 ng/mm^2. All sensorgrams were recorded at a flow rate of 3 µl/min at 25 °C in TENGNCT buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 0.4 mM EDTA, 40 mM NaCl, 4% glycerol, 0.4% Nonidet-P40, 0.1% carboxymethyldextran, 0.005% Tween 20). Each protein was injected for 10 min. Regeneration after each binding experiment was performed by continuous TENGNCT buffer flow at a rate of 25 µl/min for 20 min. The kinetic analysis of GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F interaction with immobilized Csk has been performed using the BIAlogue software (Pharmacia biosensor) as described previously(32) .

Two-hybrid System Methods

S. cerevisiae strain L40 (MATatrp1 leu2 his3 LYS2::lexA-HIS3 URA3::lexA-lacZ) (33) was grown at 30 °C in YPD medium containing 1% yeast extract, 2% polypeptone, and 2% glucose. The full-length rat csk cDNA was fused to the DNA-binding domain of (LexA-DB) in pVJL10, pBTM116 plasmid (34) in which the frame of the cloning site has been modified. (^2)Human LCK cDNA was cloned in fusion with Gal4-activating domain (Gal4-AD) in pGAD-GH (35) . Plasmid DNA transformations were carried out using the lithium acetate method(36) . Double transformants were plated on yeast drop-out medium lacking tryptophan and leucine (36) and grown for 3 days at 30 °C. Resulted colonies were patched on the same medium and replica-plated either on yeast drop-out medium lacking tryptophan, leucine, and histidine, or on Whatman 40 filters and tested for beta-galactosidase activity(37) . Plasmids pLexA-Ras(33) and pGAD-Raf (38) were used as controls.

In Vitro Kinase Assay

In vitro phosphorylation of c-Fgr: 500 nM of purified c-Fgr (39) was incubated in a reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MnCl(2), and 100 µM of cold ATP for 30 min at 30 °C. In vitro phosphorylation of GST-Lck.WT by Csk: 100 nM of purified GST-Lck.WT was incubated with 100 nM of purified recombinant Csk (without GST) and with various concentrations of Lck-Y394 peptides (Y394: H-RLIEDNEYTAREGAK-OH and pY394: H-RLIEDNEY(PO(3))TAREGAK-OH) in a reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 3 mM MnCl(2), 0.1% Nonidet-P40, and 10 µCi of [-P]ATP (5000 Ci/mmol, Amersham Corp.). After 5 min at 30 °C the reaction was analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. The labeled proteins were excised from the gel, and radioactivity was determined by Cerenkov radiation.

Tryptic Phosphopeptide Mapping

P-Labeled band corresponding to in vitro phosphorylated GST-Lck.WT by Csk was excised from polyacrylamide gels. The slice of the dried gel was rehydrated with 200 µl of 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.8, and exhaustively digested with trypsin (50 µg, Sigma) at 37 °C for 18 h. 10 µg of Lck-Y505 tryptic peptide (H-SVLEDFFTATEGQYQPQP-OH) were phosphorylated with 40 nM of purified recombinant Csk (without GST) in a reaction mixture containing 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 3 mM MnCl(2), 0.1% Nonidet-P40, and 10 µCi of [-P]ATP (5000 Ci/mmol, Amersham) for 10 min at 30 °C. Tryptic phosphopeptides were analyzed on 40% polyacrylamide gel as described elsewhere (40) followed by autoradiography.

RESULTS

Production and Purification of Csk, Lck, and c-Fgr

In our study, we used Lck and Csk purified as recombinant proteins using the GST prokaryotic expression system which allows production of highly pure and active fusion proteins (as shown in Jullien et al. (28) and Bougeret et al.(29) ). We purified full-length Lck wild-type, or with a point mutation in (the autophosphorylation site (Y394F), or with a point mutation in the negative regulatory site (Y505F), or with a point mutation in the ATP binding site (K273E)(28) . In addition, we also purified full-length Csk, and Csk SH3 and SH2 domains either alone or combined, wild-type or with a point mutation in the SH2 domain (S108C) which abolishes interaction with phosphotyrosine proteins(29, 30) . Another Src PTK used in this study, c-Fgr, has been purified to homogeneity from rat spleen (as shown in Brunati et al.(39) ).

We have previously shown that with the exception of the inactive mutant (GST-Lck.K273E), all other GST-Lck proteins were tyrosine phosphorylated in vivo in bacteria due to autophosphorylation. We have previously determined that Tyr was phosphorylated in the GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F mutant, and Tyr was phosphorylated in the GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y394F mutant(28) . Therefore, in our binding and phosphorylation experiments, these GST-Lck proteins were used without prior in vitro phosphorylation. On the contrary, the purified c-Fgr was not tyrosine-phosphorylated in vivo. It has been shown that c-Fgr autophosphorylates in vitro on the conserved autophosphorylation site, Tyr(10) . Thus, for our binding studies, we used c-Fgr either nonphosphorylated or after in vitro autophosphorylation.

Binding of Recombinant GST-Lck and Purified c-Fgr to Immobilized Csk

Csk-Lck interaction was studied in real time using a biosensor instrument, BIAcore (Pharmacia), that relies upon surface plasmon resonance (SPR) to measure changes in refractive index upon binding of a soluble analyte (GST-Lck) to an immobilized ligand (Csk). The SPR signal is expressed as a sensorgram, in RU plotted as a function of time(25) . Fig. 1A displays in overlay format the real-time measurement of association and dissociation phases of different GST-Lck proteins with immobilized full-length Csk. In order to avoid protein dimerization through GST/GST interaction, we immobilized a purified Csk protein treated with thrombin which removes the GST part of the recombinant protein. During the injection of GST-Lck (association phase), binding of GST-Lck to Csk can be followed as a gradual rise of the resonance signal. When buffer replaces GST-Lck solution, dissociation of the GST-Lck/Csk complex can be seen (dissociation phase). The difference between the baseline value and the value obtained at the end of the injection indicates binding of GST-Lck proteins to Csk surface. We observed that GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F proteins bound to immobilized Csk (350 and 940 RU, respectively). In contrast, we did not detect significant binding of the inactive GST-Lck.K273E mutant (10 RU). Since this mutant is not phosphorylated on tyrosine, this suggests that Lck-Csk interaction requires previous tyrosine phosphorylation of Lck. In addition, no significant binding with the GST-Lck.Y394F mutant which does not contain the Tyr was observed (20 RU), indicating that the previous tyrosine phosphorylation of Lck which is required for binding of Lck to Csk might occur on Tyr. We have previously shown that GST-Lck.Y505F purified from bacteria is more phosphorylated on Tyr than GST-Lck.WT(28) . This might explain the higher binding of the mutant form of Lck (940 RU) compared to the wild-type form (350 RU), and is further evidence for the involvement of Tyr of Lck in the interaction with Csk. Altogether, these results suggest that Lck interacts with Csk via its phosphorylated Tyr residue.

Figure 1: Binding studies of recombinant GST-Lck and purified c-Fgr to immobilized Csk. Purified Csk was immobilized within the flow-cell matrix and each protein was injected for 10 min. Arrows indicate the degree of binding, in relative RU, taken just at the end of the injection. Regeneration after each binding experiment was performed by continuous buffer flow for 20 min. A, purified GST-Lck proteins were injected at a concentration of 1 µM. B, Purified GST-Lck.Y505F and purified c-Fgr, either prephosphorylated in vitro with cold ATP (+ATP) or not (-ATP), were injected at 500 nM.


In a search for modified sequences surrounding the autophosphorylated Tyr of Src family PTKs, we noticed that c-Fgr is the only Src PTK to have a different motif at the autophosphorylation site (Tyr-Asn-Pro-Cys instead of Tyr-Thr-Ala-Arg)(41) . Therefore we tested the interaction of purified c-Fgr with immobilized Csk (Fig. 1B). We did not detect any binding of c-Fgr to Csk either nonphosphorylated (30 RU) or after in vitro autophosphorylation (32 RU), whereas, on the same Csk surface, a strong binding of GST-Lck.Y505F was measured (750 RU). This suggests that the conserved sequence at the autophosphorylation site is required for Lck interaction with Csk.

To determine which part of Csk was involved in the interaction with Lck, we injected GST-Lck.Y505F either alone or preincubated with different subdomains of Csk over a Csk immobilized surface. The results are summarized in Table 1. Complete inhibition of the binding was observed when GST-Lck.Y505F was preincubated either with full-length Csk (purified without GST) or with GST-Csk SH3/SH2 fusion protein. However, the recombinant GST-Csk SH3/SH2.S108C protein with the point-mutation in the SH2 domain which abolishes its binding to phosphotyrosine proteins(30) , did not prevent Lck interaction with Csk. Furthermore the binding was not affected by preincubation of GST-Lck.Y505F with GST-Csk SH3 fusion protein. These results suggest that Csk interacts with Lck via its SH2 domain. Surprisingly, the GST-Csk SH2 fusion protein was unable to inhibit this interaction. By in vitro binding assays, we have observed that Csk SH2 domain alone was unable to bind phosphotyrosine proteins, whereas Csk SH3/SH2 domains clearly displayed such an interaction(^3)(30) . These results suggest that the SH3 domain of Csk participates in the interaction, presumably by allowing the SH2 domain to have the required steric conformation.

Kinetic Analysis of Recombinant GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F Interaction with Immobilized Csk

To compare the kinetic parameters for GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F binding to Csk, we determined association and dissociation constants using different GST-Lck concentrations (Fig. 2, A and B). The association phase (600 s of injection) was used to determine association constants k(a) (Fig. 2, C and D) and the dissociation phase (200 s after the end of the injection) was used to determine dissociation constants k(a) (Fig. 2, E and F). Equilibrium affinity constants K(D) were obtained by Scatchard analysis (Fig. 2, G and H). The results are summarized in Table 2. The apparent affinity constants (calculated either from k(d)/k(a) or from equilibrium data) for binding of GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F to Csk are similar to those reported for binding of phosphotyrosine peptides to SH2 domains using the same experimental approach(42, 43) . Interestingly, whereas the k(d) for GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F are similar, there is a significant difference in the k(a) for GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F (15-fold higher). Thus, the GST-Lck.Y505F mutant binds to Csk with a 9-fold higher affinity than GST-Lck.WT due to a much higher association rate. The lower association rate observed for GST-Lck.WT might be explained by the heterogeneity of GST-Lck.WT protein which is phosphorylated either on Tyr or on Tyr, or on both(28) . As phosphorylated Tyr can interact with Lck SH2 domain, this may decrease the accessibility of Csk SH2 domain to the phosphorylated Tyr.

Figure 2: Kinetic analysis of recombinant GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F interaction with immobilized Csk. Purified GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F proteins were used at various concentrations (conc.) ranging from 62.5 nM to 1000 nM and allowed to interact with immobilized Csk for 10 min (sensorgrams A and B, respectively). The association phase was analyzed in a dR/dt versus R plot for each GST-Lck concentration. The slope values obtained are plotted against GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F concentrations (C and D, respectively). The dissociation phase was followed in continuous buffer flow during 200 s after the end of the injection and was analyzed in a ln (R(1)/R) versus time plot for GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F (E and F, respectively). Equilibrium values were determined by fitting the steady state binding values (Req) to the binding equation by Scatchard analyses, giving rise to a R/GST-Lck concentration versus R plot for GST-Lck.WT and GST-Lck.Y505F (G and H, respectively).


Interaction between Csk and Lck in Vivo

To confirm the interaction between Csk and Lck in vivo, we used the yeast two-hybrid system(27) . Full-length wild-type csk and lck genes were fused to LexA-DB in pVJL10 and to Gal4-AD in pGAD-GH, respectively. If the two proteins interact, the reporter strain is expected to grow in the absence of histidine and to produce beta-galactosidase. Using Western blot analysis with a monoclonal anti-phosphotyrosine antibody, we confirmed that Lck expressed in yeast is phosphorylated on tyrosine residue(s) (data not shown). Fig. 3shows that only pLexA-Csk/pGADGH-Lck conferred on L40 yeast cells the ability to grow in the absence of histidine, but not any negative controls. In addition, only this strain was able to transactivate the lacZ reporter gene (data not shown). L40 pLexA-Ras/pGAD-Raf was used as a positive control(33, 38) . Therefore, we confirmed in vivo that there is a direct interaction between Csk and Lck.

Figure 3: Interaction of Csk and Lck proteins in the yeast two-hybrid system. The L40 reporter strain was transformed with the indicated plasmids. Growth in the absence of histidine indicates the interaction between hybrid proteins. L40 pLex-Ras/pGAD-Raf was used as a positive control. Each patch represents an independent transformant.


Analysis of Recombinant GST-Lck.WT Phosphorylation by Csk

The finding of Csk interaction with Lck through BIAcore studies and using the yeast two-hybrid system was further confirmed by an independent experiment in which we determined phosphorylation of GST-Lck.WT by Csk (purified without GST). In an initial analysis, concentrations of GST-Lck.WT and Mn were varied to have low level of Lck autophosphorylation. Under these conditions, the level of GST-Lck.WT autophosphorylation (Fig. 4A, lane 1) was at least 10-fold lower than the phosphorylation of GST-Lck.WT by Csk (Fig. 4A, lane 2). To identify the phosphorylation sites on Lck, tryptic digestion was performed on GST-Lck.WT phosphorylated by Csk. A single phosphopeptide was obtained (Fig. 4B, lane 1) which comigrates with a synthetic tryptic peptide containing the phosphorylated Tyr of Lck (Fig. 4B, lane 2). Furthermore, we did not detect any phosphorylation of GST-Lck.Y505F incubated with Csk (data not shown). Together these results show that Tyr of Lck is the phosphorylation site by Csk. Next, the different GST-Lck fusion proteins were phosphorylated in vitro by Csk (Fig. 4C). The phosphorylation of GST-Lck.WT was 13-fold higher than the phosphorylation of GST-Lck.K273E and 3-fold higher than the phosphorylation of GST-Lck.Y394F, suggesting that previous phosphorylation of Lck on Tyr facilitates the phosphorylation of Tyr by Csk. The phosphorylation of GST-Lck.Y394F by Csk might be due to binding of phosphorylated Tyr of Lck to Csk SH2 domain. As we did not detect any interaction between Csk and GST-Lck.Y394F in our BIAcore studies, this binding might be of very low affinity and irrelevant in vivo. The fact that the inactive GST-Lck.K273E mutant, which is not tyrosine phosphorylated, is much less phosphorylated by Csk is consistent with our hypothesis that Lck phosphorylation by Csk is enhanced by previous tyrosine phosphorylation of Lck. Finally, the GST-Lck.WT protein was phosphorylated in vitro by Csk either alone or in the presence of peptide corresponding to the sequence surrounding the Tyr of Lck (Fig. 4D). We observed that the addition of Lck-Tyr phosphopeptide inhibits the phosphorylation of GST-Lck.WT by Csk, in a dose dependent manner. This inhibition was not observed with the nonphosphorylated peptide. Furthermore, no inhibition was observed with a synthetic tryptic peptide containing the Tyr of Lck phosphorylated used at the same concentrations (data not shown), showing the specificity of the inhibition observed with the Lck-Tyr phosphopeptide. Therefore, the blocking of the binding site for Lck on Csk occurring with the Lck-Tyr phosphopeptide, but not with the nonphosphorylated one, impinges on the phosphorylation of Lck by Csk, suggesting that Lck phosphorylated on Tyr binds more efficiently to Csk.

Figure 4: Analysis of recombinant GST-Lck.WT phosphorylation by Csk. A, in vitro phosphorylation of Lck. 100 nM GST-Lck.WT was incubated in vitro with (lane 2) or without (lane 1) 100 nM of Csk in presence of [-P]ATP and analyzed on 10% SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. B, tryptic phosphopeptide mapping. In vitro phosphorylated GST-Lck.WT by Csk (as described in A) was excised from dried acrylamide gels and digested with trypsin (lane 1). 10 µg of Lck-Y505 synthetic tryptic peptide were phosphorylated with 40 nM of Csk in presence of [-P]ATP (lane 2). Tryptic phosphopeptides were analyzed by running on 40% polyacrylamide gel followed by autoradiography. C, phosphorylation of Lck mutants. 100 nM of GST-Lck.WT (lane 1), GST-Lck.K273E (lane 2) or GST-Lck.Y394F (lane 3) was incubated in vitro with 100 nM of Csk in presence of [-P]ATP and analyzed on 10% SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. D, inhibition of Lck phosphorylation. 100 nM of GST-Lck.WT was incubated in vitro with 100 nM of Csk and [-P]ATP, alone or in presence of various concentrations of phosphorylated (P) and nonphosphorylated Lck-Y394 peptide. The reaction was resolved by SDS-PAGE and the radioactivity of labeled proteins was counted by Cerenkov radiation. Results are expressed as a percent inhibition of GST-Lck.WT phosphorylation and the values represent an average of three separate experiments.


DISCUSSION

Using two systems which allow to detect transient interaction, the in vitro real-time interaction analysis (BIAcore) and the in vivo yeast two-hybrid system, we have shown that Csk interacts physically with Lck. Through BIAcore experiments, we noticed the absence of detectable binding of Lck.K273E and Lck.Y394F to Csk, and the inhibition of Lck-Csk interaction by pre-incubation of Lck with Csk SH3/SH2 domains, which is not observed with a mutant of Csk SH3/SH2 protein (S108C) unable to bind phosphotyrosine proteins. This strongly suggests that the autophosphorylated Tyr of Lck interacts with the SH2 domain of Csk. Furthermore, using a Y505F mutant of Lck we observed an increase in the rate of association but no change in the rate of dissociation compared to wild-type Lck. On the one hand, the fact that the Lck.Y505F mutant which corresponds to an hyperactive form due to the absence of the negative regulatory site, binds to Csk with a higher rate of association, suggests that the binding of Csk to Lck is enhanced by an increase of the kinase activity of Lck through a yet unknown mechanism. On the other hand, the fact that we did not observe any change in the dissociation rate of the Lck.Y505F mutant which is not phosphorylated by Csk, suggests that the release of Lck after interaction with Csk is not due to phosphorylation by Csk, but might be due to the transience of the interaction. Thus, the off-rate might be too rapid to detect a stable complex between Src PTKs and Csk by conventional binding assays(11, 23) . Finally, through in vitro phosphorylation experiments, we have also demonstrated that Lck phosphorylated on Tyr is more efficiently phosphorylated on Tyr by Csk, suggesting a functional interaction between Lck and Csk involving the phosphorylated Tyr of Lck. Similarly, another group has observed that Csk phosphorylates cellular proteins, including Lck, in a phosphotyrosine dependent manner, suggesting that previous substrate tyrosine phosphorylation may be critical for the substrate selection of Csk. (^4)Interestingly, we have shown by immunofluorescence microscopy that upon T cell activation the cytoplasmic Csk (revealed with fluorescent tagged monoclonal anti-Csk antibody) translocates to plasma membrane where most of Lck is localized.^3 This is compatible with the hypothesis that after T cell stimulation, membrane bound Lck is activated, phosphorylated on Tyr, which creates a temporary binding site for Csk. We propose that the binding of Csk SH2 domain to the autophosphorylated Tyr of the Src kinases facilitates phosphorylation of the COOH-terminal Tyr by Csk thereby repressing the kinase activity. This mechanism may be a general feature for down modulation of the kinase activity of most Src PTKs.

We observed that both the SH3 and the SH2 domains of Csk are required for the binding to phosphorylated Tyr of Lck, suggesting that the SH3 domain participates in the interaction. Such a role has been reported by several groups (19, 20, 44) who found that the SH3 domain of c-Src was required for the intramolecular binding of the phosphorylated COOH-terminal Tyr to the SH2 domain. Furthermore, Panchamoorthy et al.(45) have recently shown that the presence of the adjacent SH3 domain increases the affinity of Fyn SH2 domain for phosphotyrosyl peptide motifs. It remains to determine the mechanism by which SH3 domains are involved in phosphotyrosine-SH2 domains interactions. The recent crystal structure of Lck SH3-SH2 fragment suggests that both the SH3 and the SH2 domains participate to form dimer and that the phosphorylated COOH-terminal Tyr binds at the intermolecular SH3/SH2 contact(46) .

The absence of Csk binding to autophosphorylated c-Fgr, the only Src PTK with a different sequence in the autophosphorylation site, is further evidence for the specificity of Csk SH2 domain interaction with amino acids surrounding the autophosphorylated Tyr. It has been shown that the selectivity of SH2 domains for specific tyrosine phosphorylated sequences is provided by the 3 amino acids immediately carboxyl-terminal of the phosphotyrosine(13, 14) . The finding that c-Fgr does not bind to Csk is consistent with the fact that once autophosphorylated, c-Fgr is no more susceptible to down-regulation by Csk phosphorylation. Indeed, previous autophosphorylation of c-Fgr does not affect its phosphorylation by Csk and even though autophosphorylated c-Fgr is still phosphorylated by Csk, this phosphorylation does not lead to down-regulation of c-Fgr. The authors propose that autophosphorylation of c-Fgr could induce an intermolecular interaction between the autophosphorylated Tyr and the SH2 domain, resulting in an active homodimeric form(10) .

An interaction between Csk SH2 domain and the autophosphorylated Tyr of Src PTKs has been postulated by Songyang et al.(14) who have shown that the sequence motif Tyr(P), Thr/Ala, Lys/Arg, Met/Ile/Val/Arg which is found within the autophosphorylation site of the Src kinases (with the exception of c-Fgr), has high affinity for the SH2 domain of Csk. Furthermore, a functional and physical interaction of Fyn and Csk has been reported and a mutant of Fyn that is highly autophosphorylated on Tyrin vivo was shown to form a more stable complex with Csk than with wild-type Fyn(47) .

The regulation of Csk-Src PTKs interaction proposed in this report does not explain the fact that an inactive form of Src expressed in mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking endogenous Src, is still phosphorylated on Tyr(48) and a Lck.Y394F mutant transfected in NIH3T3 cells is still phosphorylated on Tyr(5) . However, in fibroblasts these phosphorylations might be due either to autophosphorylation, as previously reported for Src in yeast cells (49) and for Lck in bacteria(28) , or to phosphorylation by other members of the Csk family. It has been shown that in cell lines established from embryos lacking Csk, the endogenous c-Src is still phosphorylated on Tyr(21) , suggesting that other kinases may phosphorylate this site in vivo. Several groups have recently described cDNAs encoding a second Csk-related protein tyrosine kinase: termed either matk(50) , hyl(51) , ctk(52) , ntk(53) , or lsk(54) . These kinases might have different affinities for Src PTKs and might be responsible for the regulation of those PTKs which do not bind to Csk. In vitro Ctk/Ntk is capable of phosphorylating Lck at its negative regulatory site (52, 53) and might also phosphorylate the Lck.Y394F mutant. In the same way, Matk can phosphorylate the COOH-terminal Tyr of c-Src (55) and might also phosphorylate the Src.Y416F. Thus, it is likely that these Csk-related kinases are capable of phosphorylating the COOH-terminal Tyr of Src PTKs in the absence of the autophosphorylated Tyr.

Little is known about the regulation of Csk itself. It has been shown that Csk SH3 an SH2 domains are both required for the suppression of c-Src kinase activity (30) and for its negative impact on T-cell activation(56) , suggesting that Csk kinase activity is regulated through these domains. Colocalization of Csk with activated Src to podosomes has been observed, and this requires both the SH3 and SH2 domains of Csk but not its kinase activity, suggesting that these domains are both necessary to target Csk to places where Src is active (23) . It has been proposed that Csk delocalization from the cytoplasm to the plasma membrane upon Src activation, is due to an interaction between Csk SH2 domain and the tyrosine phosphorylated Ras GTPase activating-associated p62 protein(57) . It has also been proposed that the binding of Csk SH2 domain to tyrosine phosphorylated cytoskeleton proteins, paxillin and pp125, may promote the accessibility of Csk to c-Src localized at certain subcellular regions (30, 58) . However, the cytosolic non myristylated form of c-Src can be fully phosphorylated at Tyr(59) , suggesting that Csk can phosphorylate c-Src in cytoplasm in the absence of any interaction with others proteins. All these findings strongly suggest that Csk function is regulated through protein-protein interactions involving its SH2 and/or SH3 domains. These domains may be required to target cytosolic Csk to the plasma membrane or cytoskeletal structure, where the known cellular substrates for Csk are localized. This could occur either through an interaction of Csk SH2 domain with tyrosine phosphorylated Src PTKs substrates, or, as we propose, through an interaction of Csk SH2 domain with autophosphorylated Src PTKs. In both case, this interaction occurs only after Src PTKs activation.

In sum, we showed that (i) the interaction of Csk with Lck requires the phosphorylated Tyr of Lck, the phosphorylation of which is correlated with its kinase activity; (ii) the hyperactive form of Lck (Y505F) has much higher affinity for Csk than the wild-type Lck, and (iii) Lck phosphorylated on Tyr is more efficiently phosphorylated by Csk. Altogether these results suggest that activated and autophosphorylated Lck interacts preferentially with Csk. We propose that the modification of Lck accessibility upon activation may be a mechanism for the control of Csk-Lck interaction. Therefore, one might assume that the control of Csk function occurs through its substrate accessibility rather than through an intrinsic mechanism.

FOOTNOTES

*
This work was supported by grants from the ``Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le SIDA'' (ANRS, 711100), the ``Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer'' (ARC, 6878), the ``Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale'' (FRM, 100455), National Cancer Institute (CA44356) (to H. H.); and Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro and Consiglio Nazionale delle Richerche (target project on Applicazioni Cliniche della Ricerca Oncologica) (to L. A. P.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

§
Student Fellow of Ministère de la Recherche et des Technologies (MRT, France). To whom correspondence should be addressed: Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, the Rockefeller University, 1230 York Ave., New York NY 10021. Tel.: 212-327-8813; Fax.: 212-327-7943.

Supported by a ``poste vert'' from INSERM (France).

**
Present address: Dept. of Biological Responses, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, Kawaramachi, Shogoin, Sakyoku, Kyoto 606, Japan.

(^1)
The abbreviations used are: PTK, protein tyrosine kinase; Csk, COOH-terminal Src kinase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; SH2, Src homology 2; SH3, Src homology 3; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; RU, resonance unit; SPR, surface plasmon resonance; WT, wild type.

(^2)
J. H. Camonis, unpublished data.

(^3)
F. Ramos-Morales and S. Fischer, unpublished data.

(^4)
K. E. Amrein and P. Burn, personal communication.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank J. Grosclaude (V.I.M., I.N.R.A., Jouy-en-Josas, France) for the use of the BIAcore instrument; A. M. Brunati, M. Ruzzene, and L. A. Pinna for the gift of purified c-Fgr; L. C. Cantley for stimulating discussions; R. B. Birge, E. Maréchal, A. August, and M. Sudol for critical reading of the manuscript; M. Bodéus and J. H. Camonis for interest and suggestions.

REFERENCES

  1. Mustelin, T. (1994) Src Family of Tyrosine Kinases in Leukocytes (Molecular Biology Intelligence Unit Ed.), Ch. 2, pp. 8-33, R. G. Landes Co., Georgetown, TX
  2. Abraham, N., and Veillette, A. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 5197-5206 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Amrein, K. E., and Sefton, B. M. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 4247-4251 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Amrein, K. E., Panholzer, B., Flint, N. A., Bannwarth, W., and Burn, P. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 10285-10289 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gervais, F. G., Chow, L. M. L., Lee, J. M., Branton, P. E., and Veillette, A. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 7112-7121 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Nada, S., Okada, M., MacAuley, A., Cooper, J. A., and Nakagawa, H. (1991) Nature 351, 69-72 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Okada, M., and Nakagawa, H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 20886-20893 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Okada, M., Nada, S., Yamanashi, Y., Yamamoto, T., and Nakagawa, H. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 24249-24252 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Bergman, M., Mustelin, T., Oetken, C., Flint, N. A., Amrein, K. E., Burn, P., and Alitalo, K. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 2919-2924 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Ruzzene, M., James, P., Brunati, A. M., Donella-Deana, A., and Pinna, L. A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 15885-15891 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Sabe, H., Knudsen, B., Okada, M., Nada, S., Nakagawa, H., and Hanafusa, H. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 2190-2194 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Pawson, T., and Gish, G. D. (1992) Cell 71, 359-362 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., Chaudhuri, M., Gish, G., Pawson, T., Haser, W. G., King, F., Roberts, T., Ratnofsky, S., Lechleider, R. J., Neel, B. G., Birge, R. B., Fajardo, J. E., Chou, M. M., Hanafusa, H., Schaffhausen, B., and Cantley, L. C. (1993) Cell 72, 767-778 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Songyang, Z., Shoelson, S. E., McGlade, J., Olivier, P., Pawson, T., Bustelo, X. R., Barbacid, M., Sabe, H., Hanafusa, H., Yi, T., Ren, R., Baltimore, D., Ratnofsky, S., Feldman, R. A., and Cantley, L. C. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 2777-2785 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Weng, Z., Thomas, S. M., Rickles, R. J., Taylor, J. A., Brauer, A. W., Seidel-Dugan, C., Michael, W. M., Dreyfuss, G., and Brugge, J. S. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 4509-4521 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Sabe, H., Okada, M., Nakagawa, H., and Hanafusa, H. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 4706-4713 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Chow, L. M. L., Fournel, M., Davidson, D., and Veillette, A. (1993) Nature 365, 156-160 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Hata, A., Sabe, H., Kurosaki, T., Takata, M., and Hanafusa, H. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7306-7313 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Superti-Furga, G., Fumagalli, S., Koegl, M., Courtneidge, S. A., and Draetta, G. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 2625-2634 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Murphy, S. M., Bergman, M., and Morgan, D. O. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 5290-5300 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Imamoto, A., and Soriano, P. (1993) Cell 73, 1117-1124 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Nada, S., Yagi, T., Takeda, H., Tokunaga, T., Nakagawa, H., Ikawa, Y., Okada, M., and Aizawa, S. (1993) Cell 73, 1125-1135 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Howell, B. W., and Cooper, J. A. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 5402-5411 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Weiss, A., and Littman, D. R. (1994) Cell 76, 263-274 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Jonsson, U., Fagerstam, L., Roos, H., Ronnberg, J., Sjolander, S., Stenberg, E., Stahlberg, R., Urbaniczky, C., Ostlin, H., and Malmquist, M. (1991) Bio/Technology 11, 620-627
  26. Smith, D. B., and Johnson, K. S. (1988) Gene (Amst.) 67, 31-40
  27. Fields, S., and Song, O. (1989) Nature 340, 245-246 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Jullien, P., Bougeret, C., Camoin, L., Bodéus, M., Durand, H., DiSanto, J. P., Fischer, S., and Benarous, R. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 224, 589-596 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Bougeret, C., Rothhut, B., Jullien, P., Fischer, S., and Benarous, R. (1993) Oncogene 8, 1241-1247 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Sabe, H., Hata, A., Okada, M., Nakagawa, H., and Hanafusa, H. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 3984-3988 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Löfas, S., and Johnsson, B. (1990) J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 21, 1526-1528 [CrossRef]
  32. Karlsson, R., Michaelsson, A., and Mattsson, L. (1991) J. Immunol. Methods 145, 229-240 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Votjek, A. B., Hollenberg, S. M., and Cooper, J. A. (1993) Cell 74, 205-214 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Bartel, P. L., Chein, C.-T., Sternglanz, R., and Fields, S. (1993) in Cellular Interactions in Development: A Practical Approach (Harley, D. A. ed) pp. 153-179, Oxford University Press, Oxford
  35. Hannon, G. J., Demetrick, D., and Beach, D. (1993) Genes & Dev. 7, 2378-2391
  36. Sherman, F., Fink, G. R., and Hicks, J. B. (1986) Methods in Yeast Genetics , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  37. Breeden, L., and Nasmyth, K. (1985) Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 50, 643-650 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Van Aelst, L., Barr, M., Marcus, S., Polverino, A., and Wigler, M. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6213-6217 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Brunati, A. M., James, P., Donella-Deana, A., Matoskova, B., Robbins, K. C., and Pinna, L. A. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 216, 323-327 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Soula, M., Rothhut, B., Camoin, L., Guillaume, J. L., Strosberg, D., Fischer, S., and Fagard, R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 27420-27427 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Katamine, S., Notario, V., Rao, C. D., Miki, T., Cheah, M. S. C., Tronick, S. R., and Robbins, K. C. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 259-266 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Felder, S., Zhou, M., Hu, P., Urena, J., Ullrich, A., Chaudhuri, M., White, M., Shoelson, S. E., and Schlessinger, J. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1449-1455 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Payne, G., Shoelson, S. E., Gish, G. D., Pawson, T., and Walsh, C. T. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 4902-4906 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Okada, M., Howell, B. W., Broome, M. A., and Cooper, J. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 18070-18075 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Panchamoorthy, G., Fukazawa, T., Stolz, L., Payne, G., Reedquist, K., Shoelson, S., Songyang, Z., Cantley, L., Walsh, C., and Band, H. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6372-6385 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Eck, M. J., Atwell, S. K., Shoelson, S. E., and Harrison, S. C. (1994) Nature 368, 764-769 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Takeuchi, M., Kuramochi, S., Fusaki, N., Nada, S., Kawamura-Tsuzuku, J., Matsuda, S., Semba, K., Toyoshima, K., Okada, M., and Yamamoto, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 27413-27419 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Thomas, J. E., Soriano, P., and Brugge, J. S. (1991) Science 254, 568-571 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. MacAuley, A., Okada, M., Nada, S., Nakagawa, H., and Cooper, J. A. (1993) Oncogene 8, 117-124 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Bennett, B. D., Cowley, S., Jiang, S., London, R., Deng, B., Grabarek, J., Groopman, J. E., Goeddel, D. V., and Avraham, H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 1068-1074 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Sakano, S., Iwana, A., Inazawa, J., Ariyama, T., Ohno, M., and Suda, T. (1994) Oncogene 9, 1155-1161 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  52. Chow, L. M. L., Jarvis, C., Hu, Q., Nye, S. H., Gervais, F. G., Veillette, A., and Matis, L. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 4975-4979 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Klages, S., Adam, D., Class, K., Fargnoli, J., Bolen, J. B., and Penhallow, R. C. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 2597-2601 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. McVicar, D. W., Lal, B. K., Lloyd, A., Kawamura, M., Chen, Y.-Q., Zhang, X., Staples, J. E., Ortaldo, J. R., and O'Shea, J. J. (1994) Oncogene 9, 2037-2044 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Avraham, S., Jiang, S., Ota, S., Fu, Y., Deng, B., Dowler, L. L., White, R. A., and Avraham, H. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1833-1842 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Cloutier, J.-F., Chow, L. M. L., and Veillette, A. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 5937-5944 [Abstract]
  57. Neet, K., and Hunter, T. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 4908-4920 [Abstract]
  58. Bergman, M., Joukov, V., Virtanen, I., and Alitalo, K. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 711-722 [Abstract]
  59. Schuh, S. M., and Brugge, J. S. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 2465-2471 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Filipp, B. Moemeni, A. Ferzoco, K. Kathirkamathamby, J. Zhang, O. Ballek, D. Davidson, A. Veillette, and M. Julius
Lck-dependent Fyn Activation Requires C Terminus-dependent Targeting of Kinase-active Lck to Lipid Rafts
J. Biol. Chem., September 26, 2008; 283(39): 26409 - 26422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
X. Chen, X. Wang, G. S. Besra, and J. E. Gumperz
Modulation of CD1d-restricted NKT cell responses by CD4
J. Leukoc. Biol., December 1, 2007; 82(6): 1455 - 1465.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
F. Romero, M.-C. Multon, F. Ramos-Morales, A. Dominguez, J. A. Bernal, J. A. Pintor-Toro, and M. Tortolero
Human securin, hPTTG, is associated with Ku heterodimer, the regulatory subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase
Nucleic Acids Res., March 15, 2001; 29(6): 1300 - 1307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Virol.Home page
F. Scholle, R. Longnecker, and N. Raab-Traub
Epithelial Cell Adhesion to Extracellular Matrix Proteins Induces Tyrosine Phosphorylation of the Epstein-Barr Virus Latent Membrane Protein 2: a Role for C-Terminal Src Kinase
J. Virol., June 1, 1999; 73(6): 4767 - 4775.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. W. Muir, D. Sondhi, and P. A. Cole
Expressed protein ligation: A general method for protein engineering
PNAS, June 9, 1998; 95(12): 6705 - 6710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Zrihan-Licht, J. Lim, I. Keydar, M. X. Sliwkowski, J. E. Groopman, and H. Avraham
Association of Csk-homologous Kinase (CHK) (formerly MATK) with HER-2/ErbB-2 in Breast Cancer Cells
J. Biol. Chem., January 17, 1997; 272(3): 1856 - 1863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bougeret, Céc.
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bougeret, Céc.
Right arrow Articles by Fischer, S.