|
Volume 271,
Number 16,
Issue of April 19, 1996 pp. 9550-9559
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
The
Human Glucocorticoid Receptor Isoform
EXPRESSION, BIOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES, AND PUTATIVE FUNCTION (*)
(Received for publication, August
24, 1995; and in revised form, January 23, 1996)
Robert
H.
Oakley
(1), (2), (§),
Madhabananda
Sar
(2),
John
A.
Cidlowski
(1)(¶)From the
(1)Laboratory of Integrative Biology,
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27709 and the
(2)Department of Physiology, University of North
Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Alternative splicing of the human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR)
primary transcript produces two receptor isoforms, hGR and
hGR , which differ at their carboxyl termini. The hGR isoform
conveys endocrine information to target tissues by altering patterns of
gene expression in a hormone-dependent fashion. In contrast to
hGR , very little is known about the hGR splice variant. Using
hGR - and hGR -specific riboprobes on human multiple tissue
Northern blots, we show that the hGR message has a widespread
tissue distribution. We also prove by reverse transcriptase-polymerase
chain reaction that the alternative splicing event underlying the
formation of the hGR message occurs in these tissues. Because the
hGR protein differs from hGR at the extreme COOH terminus, we
investigated several of the biochemical properties of hGR
expressed in transfected cells. hGR does not bind the
glucocorticoid agonist dexamethasone nor the glucocorticoid antagonist
RU38486 in vivo. Moreover, in contrast to hGR , hGR
is located primarily in the nucleus of transfected cells independent of
hormone administration. Finally, in the absence of hGR , hGR
is transcriptionally inactive on a glucocorticoid-responsive enhancer.
However, when both isoforms are expressed in the same cell, hGR
inhibits the hormone-induced, hGR -mediated stimulation of gene
expression. Thus, hGR potentially functions as a dominant negative
inhibitor of hGR activity.
INTRODUCTION
Two human glucocorticoid receptor (hGR) ( )cDNA
clones, termed hGR and hGR , were isolated in 1985 that
predicted the existence of two receptor isoforms differing at their
carboxyl termini(1) . Amino acid sequence analysis revealed
that the hGR and hGR isoforms were identical through amino
acid 727 but diverged beyond this position with hGR having an
additional 50 amino acids and hGR an additional, nonhomologous 15
amino acids. Exons 1-8 of the hGR gene contain the 5` noncoding
and coding sequences common to the hGR and hGR cDNAs, and
exons 9 and 9 contain the coding and 3` noncoding sequences
specific to the hGR and hGR cDNAs(2) . Because the
hGR - and hGR -specific sequences are located on the same gene,
alternative splicing of exons 9 and 9 was speculated to be
the mechanism responsible for generating the two receptor isoforms.
However, initial Western blot analysis detected only the larger 94-kDa
hGR isoform, and only hGR appeared to bind hormone and induce
expression of a glucocorticoid-responsive reporter plasmid in a
hormone-dependent manner(1, 3) . Because of its
predominant expression, ligand binding properties, and transcriptional
activity, hGR became the primary focus of subsequent research. As
a result, its expression, biochemical properties, and physiological
function have been well characterized. hGR is expressed in most
human tissues and cell lines and belongs to the superfamily of
steroid/thyroid/retinoic acid receptor proteins that function as
ligand-dependent transcription factors (for reviews see (4, 5, 6) ). Members of this family are
organized into structurally and functionally defined domains.
Specifically, hGR is comprised of a unique amino-terminal variable
region that includes a transactivation domain that is important for
regulation of gene expression. hGR also contains a central
DNA-binding domain crucial for specific interaction of the receptor
with DNA sequences containing glucocorticoid receptor responsive
elements (GRE). The carboxyl terminus of the hGR protein contains
the hormone-binding domain as well as sequences important for
interaction with heat shock protein 90 (hsp90)(7) , nuclear
translocation(8) , receptor dimerization(9) , and
transactivation(10) . In the absence of hormone, hGR
resides predominantly in the cytoplasm of cells, where it exists as a
large multiprotein complex (for reviews see (11) and (12) ). This complex appears to consist of the receptor
polypeptide, two molecules of hsp90, and several additional proteins.
The association of hsp90 with the receptor is believed to maintain the
receptor in a high affinity hormone binding state and sequester the
receptor in the cytoplasm by inactivating the nuclear localization
signals (NLS). Once hormone binds the receptor, a conformational change
ensues resulting in the dissociation of hsp90 and the other associated
proteins. In its new conformation hGR translocates into the
nucleus, where it binds as a homodimer to GREs that are usually found
in the promoter regions of steroid-responsive genes. The receptor then
communicates with the basal transcription machinery to either enhance
or repress transcription of the linked gene. hGR can also modulate
gene expression by physically interacting with other nuclear proteins
such as AP-1 (13, 14, 15) and
NF- B(16) . In contrast to hGR , very little is
known about the physiological significance of hGR . We demonstrate
here that a mRNA transcript consistent in size with the hGR cDNA
is expressed in various human adult and fetal tissues and in several
transformed human cell lines. We also confirm that the alternative
splicing event underlying the formation of the hGR message occurs
in these tissues. In addition, we show that the unique COOH-terminal
end of hGR influences several key biochemical properties of this
isoform that distinguishes it from hGR . We demonstrate that
hGR does not bind glucocorticoids or antiglucocorticoids in
vivo, resides in the nucleus independent of hormone
administration, and in the absence of hGR is transcriptionally
inactive on a glucocorticoid-responsive enhancer. It was recently
reported that transfected hGR inhibits transfected
hGR -mediated induction of the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV)
promoter(17) . We extend these findings by demonstrating that
hGR represses the activity of endogenous hGR and that this
hGR -mediated repression is a general phenomenon of
glucocorticoid-responsive promoters. Thus, the physiological
significance of hGR may reside in its ability to antagonize the
function of hGR .
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
MaterialsDexamethasone (DEX) was obtained from
Steraloids (Wilton, NH). [ H]DEX (48.2 Ci/mmol)
and [ C]chloramphenicol (40-60 mCi/mmol)
were obtained from DuPont NEN. RU38486 (RU486) and
[ H]RU486 (50.6 Ci/mmol) were kindly provided by
Dr. R. Deraedt, Roussel-UCLAF (Romainville, France).
[ - P]UTP (3000 Ci/mmol) was purchased from
ICN Radiochemical. The murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, AmpliTaq DNA polymerase, deoxynucleotide triphosphates,
MgCl , and the RT-PCR buffers were purchased from
Perkin-Elmer. Acetyl coenzyme A was obtained from Boehringer Mannheim,
and thin layer chromatography sheets were from EM Separations.
Recombinant PlasmidsThe hGR expression
vector pCYGR (by Y. Itoh-Lindstrom and J. A. Cidlowski) served as the
vector for the expression plasmids pCMVhGR and pCMVhGR
utilized in this study. pCYGR was constructed by isolating the 3.0-kb KpnI-XhoI cDNA fragment of
pRShGR (3) . This fragment (which includes the entire
hGR coding region and the first 384 bp of the hGR 3`UTR) was
then cloned downstream of the human cytomegalovirus major intermediate
early gene promoter region in the plasmid pCMV5(18) . The
hGR expression vector pCMVhGR was constructed by isolating
the 3.3-kb ClaI-BamHI cDNA fragment from the
hGR clone OB7(1) . This fragment (which contains the
distal 940 bp of the hGR coding region and the 2322 bp hGR
3`UTR) was then cloned into the ClaI-BamHI
sites in pCYGR. The hGR expression vector pCMVhGR was
constructed by isolating the 2.3-kb ClaI-BamHI
cDNA fragment from the hGR clone OB10(1) . This fragment
(which contains the hGR -specific coding sequences as well as the
1430-bp hGR 3`UTR) was then cloned into the ClaI-BamHI sites in pCYGR. Plasmids
pGMCS(19) , pGRE2CAT(20) , and pBLCAT2 (21) have been previously described.
Cell Culture and TransfectionsHeLa S and COS-1 cells were grown as described
previously(22, 23) . CV-1 cells were grown in
Dulbecco's minimum essential medium supplemented with 2 mM glutamine and 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum. CEM-C7
cells were grown in suspension in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2
mM glutamine and 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal calf serum.
All cultures were maintained in a 5% CO humidified
atmosphere at 37 °C and were passaged every 3-4 days. HeLa
S and COS-1 cells were transfected essentially as described
previously(22) . Briefly, 4 h before transfection, medium was
replaced with fresh Dulbecco's minimum essential medium
containing 3% serum. Plasmid DNA was prepared as a calcium phosphate
precipitate and incubated with cells for 5 h followed by a 30-s shock
with 15% glycerol. Cells were then refed supplemented medium.
Northern BlotsHuman adult and fetal multiple
tissue Northern blots were purchased from ClonTech (Palo Alto, CA).
Membranes were prehybridized and hybridized at 65 °C in 50%
formamide, 5 SSPE, 5 Denhardt's solution, 2% SDS,
200 µg/ml yeast RNA, 200 µg/ml denatured sheared salmon sperm
DNA. P-Labeled antisense RNA probes (1 10 cpm/ml hybridization fluid) were generated from a T3/T7
promoter-containing vector containing the distal hGR 3`UTR (537-bp PstI-KpnI fragment from the hGR clone
OB7), the hGR coding and proximal 3`UTR (581-bp NsiI-SstI fragment from the hGR clone
OB10), or the entire hGR coding region ( 3-kb KpnI-XhoI fragment from the hGR expression
vector pRShGR ). Following hybridization, blots were washed once at
room temperature and four times at 65 °C in 0.1 SSPE, 0.1%
SDS. The blots were then exposed to x-ray film. Membranes were stripped
of radioactivity for 30 min in 0.1 SSPE, 0.1% SDS heated to 100
°C before reprobing.
RT-PCRHuman liver and lung total RNA were kindly
provided by Dr. Darryl Zeldin (NIEHS). Human heart, brain, and skeletal
muscle total RNA was purchased from ClonTech. Total RNA from HeLa
S and CEM-C7 cells was isolated using TRIzol Reagent (Life
Technologies, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
cDNA was prepared in a buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
8.3, 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl , 1 mM each dGTP, dATP, dTTP, and dCTP, 20 units RNase inhibitor, 50
units murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase, 2.5 µM random hexamers, 1.0 µg of sample RNA, in a final volume of 20
µl. This mixture was incubated for 10 min at RT, 15 min at 42
°C, and 5 min at 99 °C and then used for amplification of
specific cDNAs by PCR. The buffer for PCR contained 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl , 2.5 units AmpliTaq DNA polymerase, 0.2
µM upstream and downstream primers, in a final volume of
100 µl. After an initial incubation for 1 min at 95 °C, samples
were subjected to 45 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 62 °C,
and 30 s at 72 °C. This was followed by a final extension step at
72 °C for 10 min. The primers used for the amplification of the
7.0-kb hGR message were as follows: 5`-GCATTCATACAGGCAGCGAT-3`
(upstream) and 5`-CCACGTATCCTAAAAGGGCAC-3` (downstream) corresponding
to nucleotides 4221-4240 and 2503-2523 of the hGR and
hGR cDNAs, respectively(1) . The primers used for the
amplification of the hGR message were as follows:
5`-CCTAAGGACGGTCTGAAGAGC-3` (upstream) and 5`-GCCAAGTCTTGGCCCTCTAT-3`
(downstream), corresponding to nucleotides 2158-2178 and
2616-2635 of the hGR cDNA(1) . The primers used for
the amplification of the hGR message were as follows:
5`-CCTAAGGACGGTCTGAAGAGC-3` (upstream) and 5`-CCACGTATCCTAAAAGGGCAC-3`
(downstream), corresponding to nucleotides 2158-2178 and
2503-2523 of the hGR cDNA(1) . Amplified DNA
fragments were electrophoretically fractionated on 1.75% agarose gels.
Restriction enzyme analysis of the RT-PCR products amplified by the
hGR - and hGR -specific primers confirmed that these fragments
contained the appropriate hGR and hGR cDNA sequences.
Restriction enzymes employed included NsiI (specific to exon
8), SspI (specific to exon 9 ), and HaeII
(specific to exon 9 ).
Quantitative RT-PCRHuman RNA (0.5 µg) was
reverse transcribed, and the resulting cDNA was amplified as described
above. 5 µl of the PCR reaction was removed at 2-cycle intervals
and electrophoresed on 1.75% agarose gels stained with ethidium
bromide. The intensity of the ethidium bromide fluorescence was
measured densitometrically and plotted as a function of cycle number to
generate amplification curves for the hGR and hGR PCR
fragments. Regression equations of the form y = a b , where y is the intensity
and n is the number of cycles, were fitted to the data in the
linear portion of the semi-logarithmic graphs. The amplification
efficiencies (E) for the hGR and hGR fragments,
while nearly identical within tissues, varied slightly across tissues: E = 0.71 and E = 0.71 for
CEM-C7 cells but E = 0.82 and E
= 0.81 for human lung. Amplification curves were also generated
(and regression equations fitted) for external standards containing
linearized pCMVhGR and pCMVhGR at ratios of 1:1000, 10:1000,
100:1000, and 1000:1000, respectively. A standard curve was generated
by plotting the difference in the number of cycles required to amplify
(during the exponential phase of each reaction) an identical amount of
the hGR and hGR PCR products (3000 densitometric units) as a
function of the pCMVhGR /pCMVhGR ratio. Similarly, the
difference in the number of cycles required to amplify (during the
exponential phase of each reaction) the same amount of hGR and
hGR PCR products (3000 densitometric units) for each human sample
was calculated. Using the standard curve regression equation, the
approximate hGR /hGR cDNA (and hence mRNA) ratio was
determined for each human tissue and cell line.
Sucrose Density Gradients and Western
BlotsSubconfluent COS-1 cells (4 10 ) were
transfected by the calcium phosphate method as described above with
equimolar amounts of pCMVhGR (40 µg), pCMVhGR (36.4
µg), or pCMV5 (20.4 µg). Each transfection was standardized to
40 µg of DNA using pBR322. Cells were harvested 48 h
post-transfection, resuspended in unsupplemented Dulbecco's
minimum essential medium containing 100 nM [ H]DEX or 20 nM [ H]RU486, and incubated for 2 h on ice with
gentle agitation. Whole cell extracts were prepared and processed on
sucrose density gradients essentially as described by Tully and
Cidlowski(24) . To verify equivalent expression of the hGR
and hGR proteins, an aliquot of each extract was analyzed by
Western blotting. Proteins (125 µg) were resolved by
electrophoresis through 7.5% polyacryalmide gels and
electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose. After incubating the
membrane with epitope-purified polyclonal anti-hGR antiserum #57 (25) at a dilution of 1:2000, immunoreactivity was visualized
using enhanced chemiluminescence according to the manufacturer's
instructions (ECL, Amersham Corp.).
ImmunohistochemistrySubconfluent COS-1 cells (2
10 ) were transfected with equimolar amounts of
pCMVhGR (20 µg) or pCMVhGR (18.2 µg) by the calcium
phosphate method as described above or by the DEAE method of Sompayrac
and Danna (26) as modified by Gorman(27) . Each
transfection was standardized to 20 µg of DNA using pBR322.
Following transfection, the cells were incubated for 24 h in
Dulbecco's minimum essential medium supplemented with 10%
dextran-coated charcoal-treated serum before plating in two-chamber
glass slides. After an additional 24-h incubation, transfected cells
were treated for 2 h with DEX (100 nM) or control vehicle and
processed for immunohistochemical staining as described previously (25) . Immunoreactivity was visualized by staining with
avidin-biotin-peroxidase or Texas red fluorescent dye.
CAT ActivitySubconfluent COS-1, CV-1, and HeLa
S cells were transfected as indicated in the appropriate
figure legends by the calcium phosphate method described above. 16 h
post-transfection, medium was removed and replaced with control medium
or medium containing DEX or RU486. Cells were harvested 24 h later and
CAT assays were performed as described previously(22) .
RESULTS
Northern Blot Analysis of the hGR Message in Human
Tissues and Cell LinesNorthern blot analysis of RNA isolated
from various human cell lines routinely shows multiple hGR mRNA
transcripts approximately 7.0 and 5.0 kb in
size(1, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33) .
These transcripts are thought to arise from the use of alternative
polyadenylation signals within the 3`UTR of exon 9 and are
presumed to encode the hGR isoform. Because early studies utilized
probes that recognized a region common to the hGR and hGR
messages, one or more of these transcripts might actually be the
hGR splice variant. In order to discriminate between hGR and
hGR messages and to assess the relative amounts of these
transcripts in a given tissue, we sequentially hybridized
poly(A) RNA isolated from various human adult and
fetal tissues with hGR - and hGR -specific cRNA riboprobes. The
hGR riboprobe was designed to recognize a 578-nucleotide segment
spanning the coding and proximal 3` noncoding regions of exon 9 .
The hGR riboprobe was designed to recognize a 534-nucleotide
segment in the distal 3`UTR of exon 9 .As shown in Fig. 1A (upper and lower panels), the
hGR probe hybridizes with an abundant message in all tissues
migrating slightly below the 7.5-kb RNA marker. Additionally, a faint
band slightly below the 4.4-kb RNA marker is observed in the adult
heart, brain, placenta, lung, liver, skeletal muscle, and pancreas RNA
samples and in the fetal brain, lung, and liver RNA samples. The length
of the hGR cDNA predicts the hGR message to be at least 4.1
kb in size, thus the lower hybridization signal (approximately 4.3 kb
in size) may correspond to the hGR mRNA transcript. In contrast to
the lower hybridization signal, the abundant message approximately 7.0
kb in size cross-reacts with the hGR riboprobe (Fig. 1B, upper and lower panels).
The hGR riboprobe also hybridizes with a message approximately 5.5
kb in size in many tissues and with a less abundant 4.4 kb message in
several tissues, and these two transcripts do not appear to cross-react
with the hGR probe (Fig. 1B, upper and lower panels). Finally, the hGR mRNA transcripts approximately
7.0, 5.5, and 4.3 kb in size are all recognized by a probe made to the
common coding region of the hGR and hGR cDNAs (data not
shown). Similar hybridization patterns are also observed on Northern
blots of RNA isolated from HeLa S cells (a human cervical
carcinoma cell line) and CEM-C7 cells (a human lymphoid cell line)
(data not shown).
Figure 1:
Northern
blot analysis of hGR messages in human adult (upper panel) and
fetal (lower panel) tissues. Human adult and fetal multiple
tissue Northern blots containing 2.0 µg of poly(A) RNA were hybridized with the hGR -specific riboprobe (A, both panels). The blots were then stripped and
rehybridized with the hGR -specific riboprobe (B, both
panels). RNA size markers are indicated along the left
margin, and the approximate sizes of the hybridization signals are
indicated along the right margin.
Characterization of the 7.0-kb hGR MessageBecause
the 7.0-kb hGR message is recognized by both the hGR and hGR
riboprobes, it must contain information from both the 9 and 9
exons. These exons, therefore, do not appear to be mutually exclusive
as previously reported(2) . This observation made it important
to determine whether the 7.0-kb message encodes the hGR or
hGR isoform. Various data suggested that it would encode hGR .
Exon 9 precedes exon 9 in the linear organization of the hGR
gene(2) . If this order is maintained in the mature message,
exon 9 would form the distal coding and proximal 3` noncoding
regions, and exon 9 would comprise the distal 3` noncoding region.
A hGR message with this arrangement at its 3` end would be expected to
encode the hGR protein. Sequence conservation between hGR exons
9 and 9 (as well as the 155-bp intron separating these two
exons) and the distal coding and 3` noncoding regions of the 6.5-kb rat
GR message (Fig. 2A) further suggested that the 7.0-kb
hGR mRNA transcript contains (moving 5` to 3`) exon 9 , intron J,
and exon 9 sequences at its distal 3` end. If all 10 exons and
intron J of the hGR gene are represented in a mature hGR message, this
message would be approximately 6.8 kb in size, consistent with the size
of the hybridization signal observed on our Northern blots.
Figure 2:
Comparison of hGR exons 9 and 9
and intron J with the rat GR cDNA (A) and RT-PCR analysis of
the 7.0 kb hGR message (B). A, using the sequence
comparison program BestFit (Sequence Analysis Software Package,
Genetics Computer Group, University of Wisconsin Biotechnology
Center)(34) , the hGR cDNA sequences 2156-2313 (exon
8), 2314-2466 (exon 9 coding), and 2467-4788 (exon
9 3`UTR)(1) ; intron J sequences 1-155(2) ;
and the hGR cDNA sequences 2314-2361 (exon 9 coding)
and 2362-3791 (exon 9 3`UTR) (1) were aligned with
the rat GR cDNA sequences 1-6322(35) . The regions of
greatest similarity and the percentage of identity between the two
aligned sequences are indicated. Triangles identify consensus
polyadenylation signals, and arrows indicate the location of
PCR primers utilized in B. B, total RNA (1.0 µg)
from HeLa S cells was reverse transcribed using random
hexamers, and first strand cDNA was subsequently amplified with the
addition of an upstream primer specific to the distal 3`UTR of exon
9 and a downstream primer specific to the proximal 3`UTR of exon
9 . The resulting RT-PCR products were then analyzed by agarose gel
electrophoresis. The reverse transcriptase was omitted in lane 1 but included in lane 2. In lanes 3-5, the
PCR product was digested with restriction enzymes that cut specifically
in exon 9 (Acc65I), intron J (HpaII), or exon
9 (HaeII). Sizes (in bp) of DNA markers (M) are
indicated in the left margin.
To test
whether the 3` end of the 7.0-kb hGR message is organized in this
fashion, we performed RT-PCR using a sense 5` primer specific to the
distal 3`UTR of exon 9 and an antisense 3` primer specific to the
proximal 3`UTR of exon 9 . If the 3` end of the 7.0-kb hGR message
consists of sequences from exon 9 , intron J, and exon 9 ,
these primers will amplify a 933-bp PCR product. When total RNA
extracted from HeLa S cells is used for RT-PCR, a PCR
product of this size is generated (Fig. 2B, lane
2). The PCR fragment is not produced when the reverse
transcriptase is omitted from the reaction, demonstrating that
contaminating DNA is not present (Fig. 2B, lane 1). In
addition, restriction enzymes that cleave sites specific to exon
9 , intron J, and exon 9 were used to confirm the sequence of
the 933-bp PCR fragment (Fig. 2B, lanes
3-5). Therefore, exon 9 makes up the distal coding and
proximal 3` noncoding regions of the 7.0-kb hGR message and both intron
J and exon 9 form the distal 3` noncoding region of the 7.0-kb hGR
message. This message would be expected to encode the hGR isoform. These RT-PCR results also demonstrate that sequences previously
identified as intron J (2) are actually exonic sequences
separating the 9 and 9 exonic sequences. In agreement with
this finding, an oligonucleotide probe specific to intron J hybridizes
on Northern blots with the 7.0-kb hGR message (data not shown).
Therefore, we propose that the hGR sequences formerly identified as
exon 9 , intron J, and exon 9 comprise one large terminal exon
(exon 9) approximately 4.1-kb in size and that the hGR gene is
organized into nine exons rather than the previously reported
ten(2) .
RT-PCR Analysis of the hGR Message in Human Tissues
and Cell LinesThe hGR -specific riboprobe also hybridizes
with a faint message approximately 4.3 kb in size on the Northern blots
shown in Fig. 1. The size of this message suggests that it might
be the hGR mRNA transcript. However, because the 7.0-kb hGR
message contains the 9 sequences at its 3` end, the 4.3-kb signal
might instead be a degradation product of the 7.0-kb hGR message.
Alternatively, the 4.3-kb signal might represent nonspecific
hybridization of the hGR probe with 28 S rRNA. Recently, it was
reported using RT-PCR that the alternative splicing event underlying
the formation of the hGR mRNA transcript occurs in many different
human tissues(17) . However, these experiments employed a very
large number of PCR cycles, and these workers apparently did not
control for potential amplification of contaminating DNA. Therefore, to
confirm that the hGR message is expressed, we performed RT-PCR on
RNA isolated from various human tissues and cell lines using primers
that hybridize on either side of the alternatively spliced region of
the 4.3-kb hGR message.A sense 5` primer specific to exon 8
and an antisense 3` primer specific to the 9 sequences were
utilized in the PCR reaction. If the alternative splicing event
underlying the formation of the 4.3-kb hGR message occurs (in
which the end of exon 8 is linked to the 9 sequences located in
the distal portion of exon 9) the hGR -specific primers will
produce a PCR product 366-bp in length. If these primers hybridize with
the 7.0-kb hGR message (which also contains the 9 sequences
at its far 3` end), they will generate a PCR product approximately 3000
bp in length. Conditions of our PCR amplification reaction did not
favor production of this large PCR fragment, and it was never observed.
For parallel analysis of the hGR mRNA transcripts, an antisense 3`
primer specific to the 9 sequences was used in combination with
the same sense 5` primer. If the default splicing event underlying the
formation of the hGR messages occurs (in which the end of exon 8
is linked to the 9 sequences at the beginning of exon 9) these
hGR -specific primers will produce a PCR product 477 bp in length. When total RNA extracted from human heart, brain, lung, liver, and
skeletal muscle is used for RT-PCR, a 366-bp PCR product is generated
by the hGR -specific primers, suggesting that the hGR message
is present in these human tissues (Fig. 3A). In
addition, the hGR -specific primers amplify the expected 477-bp PCR
product in each tissue (Fig. 3B). When the reverse
transcriptase is omitted from the RT-PCR reaction, the expected PCR
fragments are not produced, indicating that only cDNA produced by the
RT step is serving as template for the correctly sized PCR product.
RT-PCR analysis was also performed on RNA isolated from HeLa S and CEM-C7 cells (Fig. 3, A and B).
Again, a 366-bp PCR fragment is produced by the hGR -specific
primers, suggesting that the hGR message is present in these
transformed human cell lines. Consistent with our Northern blot data,
the hGR message appears to have a widespread tissue distribution.
Figure 3:
RT-PCR analysis of RNA isolated from human
tissues and cell lines using hGR - and hGR -specific primers.
Total RNA (0.5 µg) isolated from various human adult tissues
(heart, brain, lung, liver, and skeletal muscle) and cell lines (HeLa
S and CEM-C7 cells) was reverse transcribed using random
hexamers. The resulting cDNA was amplified using either
hGR -specific (A) or hGR -specific (B)
primers. For each set of primers, the reverse transcriptase was omitted
in lanes 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 but included in lanes 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, and 15. No RNA was added in lane 1. The RT-PCR products
were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. The sizes (in bp) of the
DNA markers (M) are 603, 310, 281/271, 234, and
194).
Together, the Northern blot and RT-PCR analyses indicate that the
hGR mRNA heterogeneity observed in human tissues and cell lines
includes both hGR and hGR messages. The more abundant
transcripts are approximately 7.0 and 5.5 kb in size and are expected
to encode the hGR isoform. Consensus polyadenylation signals are
located at the end of the 9 sequences in exon 9, and use of these
signals would generate a hGR message approximately 1.6 kb shorter
than the full-length 7.0-kb hGR message. These consensus signals
are functional because they terminate transcription of the hGR
cDNA cloned into an expression vector lacking other polyadenylation
signals (data not shown). Therefore, the 5.5-kb hGR message
appears to originate from alternative polyadenylation at these
consensus sites. The less abundant hGR message recognized by the
hGR -specific probe and approximately 4.3 kb in size is expected to
encode the hGR isoform. This mRNA transcript results from
alternative splicing in which a 3` acceptor site preceding the 9
sequences in exon 9 is utilized by the splicing machinery rather than
the normal 3` acceptor site preceding the 9 sequences in exon 9.
The model shown in Fig. 4summarizes the predicted structure at
the 3` end of the hGR gene, primary transcript, and mature hGR and
hGR mRNAs; the processing events underlying the formation of these
mature messages; and the predicted translation products of these
transcripts.
Figure 4:
Predicted structure of the hGR gene and
gene products. hGR sequences formerly identified as exon 9 , intron
J, and exon 9 comprise one large exon (exon 9). Alternative
processing of exon 9 generates multiple hGR messages. Specifically,
splicing event #1 (default splicing pathway) in which the end of exon 8
is linked to beginning of exon 9 is predicted to generate the 7.0- and
5.5-kb hGR messages, which differ in size due to the use of
alternative polyadenylation signals. Splicing event #2 (alternative
splicing pathway) in which the end of exon 8 is linked to the beginning
of the 9 sequences is predicted to generate the 4.3-kb hGR
message. Translation of the messages produces the hGR and hGR
isoforms, which are identical through amino acid 727 but then diverge.
The functional domains and the putative site of hsp90 interaction are
indicated for each isoform. Exons and introns (not to scale) are
designated by boxes and lines, respectively. The arrows along the primary transcript identify the location of
consensus polyadenylation signals. Splicing of introns A-G is not shown. The hGR - and hGR -specific cRNA probes used
in this study are indicated by solid
lines.
Based on the intensity of the Northern blot signals,
the two hGR messages (7.0 and 5.5 kb) are much more abundant than
the 4.3-kb hGR message (see Fig. 1). To more accurately
assess the relative levels of the hGR and hGR mRNA
transcripts, we performed quantitative RT-PCR on RNA isolated from
adult lung, adult liver, HeLa S cells, and CEM-C7 cells.
Reaction cycle intensity curves for the 477-bp hGR and 366-bp
hGR PCR products are shown for each tissue and cell line in Fig. 5A. For estimation of the hGR /hGR mRNA
ratio, regression equations were fitted to the linear portion of each
amplification curve, and the difference in the number of cycles
required to amplify an equal amount of hGR and hGR PCR
product was calculated. Similarly, the difference in cycle number
required to amplify an equal amount of hGR and hGR PCR
product was determined for a series of external standards containing
known hGR /hGR cDNA ratios. Using the standard curve shown in Fig. 5B, the hGR /hGR cDNA (and hence mRNA)
ratio for each human sample was calculated and is as follows: 0.34% for
lung, 0.21% for liver, 0.21% for HeLa S cells, and 0.22%
for CEM-C7 cells. Although these values reflect a large difference in
expression levels, one should bear in mind that the amount of the
477-bp hGR fragment is derived from two hGR messages (7.0 and
5.5 kb), whereas the amount of 366-bp hGR fragment comes only from
the 4.3-kb hGR message. In addition, our approach assumes that the
efficiency of the RT reaction is the same for both the hGR and
hGR mRNA transcripts. This may not be the case.
Figure 5:
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of hGR
and hGR messages. A, human RNA (0.5 µg) was reverse
transcribed, and the resulting cDNA amplified using hGR - or
hGR -specific primers. Aliquots of the PCR reaction were removed at
2-cycle intervals and electrophoresed on agarose gels stained with
ethidium bromide. Representative gels showing amplification of the
477-bp hGR and 366-bp hGR fragments are from human lung (upper panel). By plotting ethidium bromide fluorescence as a
function of cycle number, hGR and hGR amplification curves
were generated for adult lung, adult liver, HeLa S cells,
and CEM-C7 cells (lower panel). B, standard curve
showing the relationship between a known hGR /hGR cDNA ratio
and the additional number of cycles required by the hGR primers to
amplify as much PCR product as the hGR primers. ``Cycle
number difference'' calculations are from the exponential phase of
each PCR reaction and are described under ``Experimental
Procedures.'' For each human tissue and cell line, the standard
curve regression equation y = -4.427LOG(x) +
0.297 (r = 0.994) was used to determine the
hGR /hGR cDNA (and hence mRNA)
ratio.
Ligand Binding Analysis of hGR Operating
under the assumption that the endogenous hGR message is translated
into the endogenous hGR protein, we began investigating the
biochemical properties of hGR when overexpressed in transfected
COS-1 cells. COS-1 cells contain undetectable levels of endogenous GR (3) and therefore provide a model system for studying the
biochemical properties of hGR in the absence of hGR . The
carboxyl-terminal 50 amino acids of hGR have been replaced in
hGR with 15 unique amino acids. To investigate the effect this has
on the ability of hGR to bind hormone or antihormone, we
transfected COS-1 cells with a hGR expression vector
(pCMVhGR ), a hGR expression vector (pCMVhGR ), or the
expression vector backbone (pCMV5). The cells were incubated with
radiolabeled DEX, a synthetic glucocorticoid agonist, or radiolabeled
RU486, a synthetic glucocorticoid antagonist.
[ H]Steroid-receptor complexes formed in vivo were then analyzed by sucrose density gradients. Showing the
standard sedimentation profile for the 8 S unactivated GR(24) ,
hGR binds both [ H]DEX and
[ H]RU486 (Fig. 6A). In contrast,
hGR does not appear to bind either of these ligands, because the
sedimentation profiles for the pCMVhGR - and pCMV5-transfected
cells are superimposable. Western blot analysis of the extracts
analyzed for hormone binding demonstrates that both the 94-kDa hGR
and 90-kDa hGR isoforms were synthesized at similar levels (Fig. 6B). Therefore, lack of steroid binding by
hGR is not due to insufficient expression of the hGR protein.
Interestingly, the hGR expression vector does not contain the
hGR -specific sequences, yet a 90-kDa protein is observed in the
pCMVhGR -transfected cells (Fig. 6B). This protein,
which cannot be hGR , appears to be a degradation product or
post-translational modification of the 94-kDa hGR isoform.
Figure 6:
In vivo ligand binding analysis
of hGR expressed in transfected COS-1 cells. A, COS-1
cells were transfected with equimolar amounts of pCMVhGR ,
pCMVhGR , or pCMV5 (mock) as described under ``Experimental
Procedures'' and incubated with 100 nM [ H]dexamethasone (upper panel) or
50 nM [ H]RU486 (lower panel)
for 2 h on ice. Whole cell extracts were prepared and loaded on
5-20% sucrose gradients. Following centrifugation, the gradients
were fractionated, and radioactivity was determined. B refers
to the bottom of the gradient, and T refers to the top. B, a portion of each whole cell extract was analyzed by
Western blotting using the anti-hGR antibody #57 (25) that
recognizes an epitope common to the 94-kDa hGR and 90-kDa hGR
proteins. Molecular mass standards are indicated in the left
margin.
Subcellular Distribution of hGR Numerous
studies have shown that hGR resides in the cytoplasm of cells in
the absence of hormone and translocates to the nucleus in a
hormone-dependent manner(11) . To determine where hGR is
localized within a given cell, COS-1 cells were transiently transfected
with the hGR or hGR expression vectors. The plasmids were
delivered into the cells using either the DEAE-dextran or calcium
phosphate transfection method to rule out potential artifacts due to
the transfection procedure. After treating the cells for 2 h with or
without DEX, immunohistochemistry was performed, and immunoreactivity
was visualized by staining with Texas red fluorescent dye or
avidin-biotin-peroxidase. In the absence of hormone hGR is found
in the cytoplasm of the transfected cells, but following hormone
administration it translocates and becomes predominantly nuclear (Fig. 7, left panel). In contrast, the hGR protein
resides primarily in the nucleus of the transfected cells independent
of hormone treatment (Fig. 7, right panel). These
findings were consistent regardless of the transfection method or
immunohistochemical staining procedure employed.
Figure 7:
Subcellular distribution of hGR
expressed in transfected COS-1 cells. COS-1 cells were transfected with
equimolar amounts of pCMVhGR (left panel) or pCMVhGR (right panel) using either the DEAE or calcium phosphate (CaPO ) transfection methods as described
under ``Experimental Procedures.'' 36 h post-transfection,
cells were treated for 2 h with vehicle (-Dex) or with
100 nM DEX (+Dex). Immunohistochemistry was then
performed using the anti-hGR antibody #57(25) , and
immunoreactivity was visualized by staining with Texas red fluorescent
dye (left side, each subpanel) or avidin-biotin-peroxidase (right side, each subpanel).
Transcriptional Activity of hGR in the Absence of
hGR hGR does not appear to bind hormone or
antihormone, but it resides primarily in the nucleus of transfected
COS-1 cells (and CV-1 cells) ( )and has been reported to bind
a consensus GRE in vitro(17) . Therefore, we
investigated the ability of hGR to activate or repress the
glucocorticoid-responsive MMTV enhancer in the presence or the absence
of steroid. For these experiments, COS-1 cells were cotransfected with
an MMTV-CAT reporter plasmid (pGMCS) and either pCMV5, pCMVhGR , or
pCMVhGR . In response to DEX, hGR induces a 4-fold increase in
CAT expression over that observed in the vehicle-treated cells, whereas
RU486 alone has little or no effect (Fig. 8A, lanes
4-6). In contrast, CAT expression is unchanged in the
hGR -containing cells treated with steroid, which is consistent
with the inability of hGR to bind these ligands (Fig. 8A, lanes 7-9). Moreover, hGR
does not appear to be constitutively active as an enhancer or repressor
because levels of CAT activity in the vehicle-treated cells are similar
whether they contain the CMV-vector backbone or pCMVhGR (Fig. 8A, compare lanes 1 and 7).
Figure 8:
Transcriptional activity of hGR in
the absence of hGR . COS-1 (A) or CV-1 (B) cells
were cotransfected with pGMCS (5.0 µg) and equimolar amounts of
pCMV5 (2.8 µg), pCMVhGR (5.5 µg), or pCMVhGR (5.0
µg). Each transfection was standardized to 10.5 µg of DNA using
pBR322. 16 h post-transfection, medium containing vehicle (CON), 100 nM DEX, or 1 µM RU486 was
added to the cells, which were then incubated an additional 24 h. Cells
were then harvested, and CAT activity was determined. The data are
plotted as fold change from basal activation (pCMV5, CON). A shows the average of three independent experiments, and B is representative of three independent
experiments.
The
hGR -mediated induction of CAT activity in transfected COS-1 cells
was only 4-fold. In cell lines where hGR inductions are much
greater, hGR might display partial transcriptional activity.
Therefore, we investigated the transcriptional activity of hGR on
the MMTV enhancer in receptor negative CV-1 cells. In response to DEX,
hGR induces a 74-fold increase in CAT expression (Fig. 8B, lanes 4 and 5). Interestingly,
hGR induces a 29-fold increase in CAT expression in response to
RU486 (Fig. 8B, lanes 4 and 6). This partial
agonist activity of RU486 has been reported previously and appears to
be cell type-specific(37) . Consistent with our findings in
COS-1 cells, CAT expression is unchanged in CV-1 cells transfected with
hGR and treated with steroid (Fig. 8B, lanes
7-9). In addition, hGR does not appear to be
constitutively active (Fig. 8B, compare lanes 1 and
7). Thus, we conclude that in the absence of hGR , hGR is
transcriptionally inactive on the glucocorticoid-responsive MMTV
enhancer.
Transcriptional Activity of hGR in the Presence of
hGR In the absence of hGR , hGR is unable to
directly enhance or repress transcription of the MMTV-CAT reporter
plasmid. To determine if hGR influences gene expression indirectly
by modulating the transactivation capacity of hGR , HeLa S cells (which contain approximately 20,000 hGR receptors per
cell) were cotransfected with pGMCS and various amounts of pCMVhGR (Fig. 9A). When pGMCS alone is transfected into the
cells, DEX treatment results in a 50-fold induction of CAT activity.
However, as increasing amounts of pCMVhGR are transfected into the
cells, the glucocorticoid-induced, hGR -mediated activation of the
MMTV enhancer is repressed in a dose-dependent manner. We observe a 78
and 96% inhibition of CAT expression when 1.0 and 3.0 µg,
respectively, of pCMVhGR is used in the transfection mixture.
Transfection of a 2-fold molar excess of the CMV-vector backbone
(pCMV5) has no effect on hGR -mediated induction of CAT expression,
indicating that hGR is responsible for the repression.
Figure 9:
Transcriptional activity of hGR in
the presence of hGR . HeLa S cells were cotransfected
with 5.0 µg of pGMCS (A) or pGRE2CAT (B) and
various amounts of pCMV5 and pCMVhGR as indicated. 16 h
post-transfection, medium containing vehicle (CON) or 100
nM DEX was added to the cells, which were then incubated an
additional 24 h. Cells were then harvested, and CAT activity was
determined. The data are plotted as fold change from basal activation
and are representative of three independent
experiments.
We next
evaluated whether the dominant negative activity of hGR on
hGR -mediated transcription is restricted to the MMTV promoter or
is a general property of glucocorticoid-responsive promoters. The
pGRE2CAT reporter plasmid contains two copies of the GRE consensus
sequence derived from the tyrosine aminotransferase gene and a TATA box
element upstream of the CAT gene(20) . In contrast to MMTV,
this ``minimal promoter'' does not contain binding sites for
other ancillary transcription factors. When HeLa S cells
are cotransfected with pGRE2CAT and various amounts of pCMVhGR (Fig. 9B), the hGR -mediated stimulation of CAT
expression is inhibited in a dose-dependent manner, and the repression
of hGR activity is similar to that observed on the MMTV promoter.
The inhibitory action of hGR is restricted to
glucocorticoid-responsive promoters because the hGR protein has no
effect on the constitutively active, nonglucocorticoid-responsive
thymidine kinase CAT reporter plasmid (pBLCAT2) (data not shown). In
sum, these results suggest that hGR represses the function of
hGR by specifically inhibiting GRE-mediated transcription.
DISCUSSION
Alternative splicing of the hGR primary transcript produces
two highly homologous isoforms, termed hGR and hGR , which
differ at their carboxyl termini(1, 2) . In contrast
to the well characterized hGR isoform, very little is known about
the hGR splice variant. In this report, we examine the expression,
biochemical properties, and physiological function of hGR .
Northern blot analysis with a hGR -specific riboprobe demonstrates
the presence of a message approximately 4.3 kb in size (consistent with
the length of the hGR cDNA) in many different human tissues. We
subsequently confirmed by RT-PCR that the alternative splicing event
proposed to underlie the formation of the hGR mRNA transcript
occurs in these tissues as well as in several transformed human cell
lines. Together, these results indicate that the hGR message is
endogenous to a variety of cells. Because both the hGR and
hGR messages are co-expressed in many of the same tissues,
previous studies investigating hGR expression with probes that did
not discriminate between hGR and hGR may be in error. The
hGR mRNA transcript generated in vivo from the
pCMVhGR expression vector is efficiently translated into the
90-kDa hGR protein in transfected COS-1, CV-1, and HeLa S cells, suggesting that the endogenous hGR message can also
serve as a template for protein synthesis. However, whether the
endogenous hGR message is actually translated into the hGR
isoform is unknown. Anti-hGR antibodies made to date in several
different laboratories have epitopes in the amino terminus and thus
recognize both the hGR and hGR proteins. The small difference
in size between the two isoforms and the potential for hGR to be
post-translationally modified or degraded into a smaller protein make
this cross-reactivity undesirable. To test directly for the expression
of the hGR protein, we are presently making a hGR -specific
antibody. During our investigation of the expression of the hGR
message, we made several observations that provide new insights both
into the structure of the hGR gene and hGR mRNAs and into the
expression of the hGR messages. The hGR gene has been previously
reported to consist of 10 exons(2) . Results from our Northern
blot and RT-PCR analyses suggest that the last two exons, 9 and
9 , and the intronic sequences separating these two exons (intron
J) together form one large terminal exon (exon 9). Exon 9 encodes the
3` end of the hormone-binding domain of the hGR protein (under
normal splicing conditions) and contains approximately 4.0 kb of 3`UTR.
It is interesting to note that the genes for the human androgen
receptor, human estrogen receptor, and chicken progesterone receptor
show a similar organization to that we have proposed here for the hGR.
In each case, the most 3` exon (exon 8) encodes the COOH-terminal
portion of the hormone-binding domain and specifies a very large
3`UTR(38, 39, 40, 41, 42) .
The differential hybridization of the hGR - and hGR -specific
riboprobes with the 7.0- and 5.5-kb hGR messages suggests that
they originate from the use of alternative polyadenylation signals
located in the 4.0-kb 3`UTR of exon 9. Similar alternative
polyadenylation events have been proposed to explain the GR mRNA
heterogeneity observed in rat tissues(35) . Within the 3`UTR of
eukaryotic mRNA reside signals that influence mRNA localization, mRNA
stability, and translation initiation(43, 44) . The
7.0- and 5.5-kb hGR messages may differ in one or more of these
properties. Both hGR messages have a widespread tissue
distribution, although the 5.5-kb hGR message does not appear to
be expressed at high levels in the brain. In addition, the 7.0-kb
message is consistently more abundant than the 5.5-kb message. The
7.0- and 5.5-kb hGR messages are much more abundant than the
4.3-kb hGR mRNA transcript. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of RNA
isolated from two adult tissues and two human cell lines suggests that
there is 200-500-fold more hGR . However, because alternative
splicing is often regulated in a spatial and/or temporal fashion, the
hGR message may be expressed at higher levels in a tissue-specific
and/or developmental stage-specific manner. In addition, the
hGR /hGR mRNA ratio may or may not reflect the
hGR /hGR protein ratio due to potential differences in
stability and/or translation efficiency of the hGR and hGR
messages and/or due to differences in protein half-life. Furthermore,
because the 7.0-kb hGR message has the 9 sequences at its far
3`UTR, we cannot exclude the possibility that it also encodes the
hGR protein. Development of hGR - and hGR -specific
antibodies will provide insight into this issue. Interestingly, the
9 sequences are well conserved in the rat GR cDNA 3`UTR,
suggesting that an hGR homolog may exist in rat. RT-PCR analysis
of rat liver (as well as a mouse lymphoma cell line) does indeed
produce a PCR product that comigrates with the 366-bp PCR fragment
derived from human cells. Thus, although the hGR
message is expressed at low levels relative to the hGR mRNA
transcripts in the human tissues so far examined, its conservation
across species suggests that it plays an important physiological role. With few exceptions(45, 46) , modification of the
GR hormone-binding domain results in a reduction or complete loss of
hormone
binding(3, 47, 48, 49, 50) .
The COOH-terminal 50 amino acids of hGR have been replaced in
hGR with 15 unique amino acids. In agreement with previous
reports(1, 3, 17) , we show that this natural
COOH-terminal modification prevents agonist binding to the hGR
protein. Recently, it was reported that a truncated version of the
human progesterone receptor B form missing the COOH-terminal 42 amino
acids did not bind progesterone or the synthetic agonist R5020 but
still bound the antiprogestin RU486(51) . This finding
suggested that amino acids at the extreme COOH terminus of the human
progesterone receptor are critical for agonist but not antagonist
binding. Because members of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily
share many of the same properties, we tested the ability of hGR to
bind RU486 but found no evidence of binding. The 15 amino acids at the
end of hGR may prevent the association of RU486 with this isoform.
Alternatively, the observation made for human progesterone receptor B
form may not be conserved among other family members. At this time,
hGR is more aptly described as an orphan receptor whose natural
ligand, if any, is unknown. The hGR receptor isoform
translocates from the cytoplasm to the nucleus in a hormone-dependent
manner(11) . In the absence of hormone, the association of
hsp90 with hGR appears to inactivate the
NLS(52, 53) . Once hormone binds hGR , hsp90
dissociates from the receptor resulting in the activation of the NLS
and subsequent nuclear import of hGR (8) . In contrast to
hGR , we demonstrate that hGR resides primarily in the nucleus
of transfected cells independent of hormone treatment. The amino acids
necessary for interacting with hsp90 (7) are present in
hGR , suggesting that hGR may be in the nucleus in spite of
its association with hsp90. Perhaps the unique COOH-terminal amino
acids of hGR delete sequences that inhibit the NLS or slightly
alter the tertiary structure of the hGR /hsp90 complex such that
the NLS are partially activated. This might account for our observation
that most, but not all, of the hGR protein is located in the
nucleus. Further studies will be required to elucidate the precise
mechanism(s) underlying the nuclear distribution of hGR . In the
absence of hGR , the hGR isoform is transcriptionally inactive
on the MMTV enhancer independent of steroid treatment. However, when
hGR and hGR are expressed in the same cell, hGR inhibits
the glucocorticoid-induced, hGR -mediated activation of the MMTV
promoter. Although this dominant negative effect was first reported in
COS-7 cells cotransfected with hGR and hGR expression
vectors(17) , we have extended this initial observation in
several respects. First, we demonstrate that this dominant negative
activity occurs in cells that have endogenous hGR receptors. In
addition, we show that the repression of hGR activity occurs with
the simple promoter pGRE2CAT. This indicates that the repression is a
general phenomenon of glucocorticoid-responsive promoters and that it
is GRE-mediated transcription that is actually inhibited. The
mechanisms responsible for the hGR -mediated repression of hGR
activity are unknown. The hGR protein is primarily located in the
nucleus of transfected cells, has an intact DNA-binding domain and has
been reported to bind a consensus GRE in vitro(17) .
Therefore, it may compete with hGR for binding to the GRE. Another
possibility is that hGR forms a heterodimer with hGR that is
transcriptionally inactive or less active than an hGR homodimer.
Alternatively, the hGR isoform may inhibit the function of
hGR by interacting with and titrating out an essential cofactor
needed by hGR for full transcriptional activity. We are currently
trying to identify the mechanism(s) responsible for the dominant
negative activity of hGR and to determine whether hGR can
inhibit hGR -mediated repression of gene expression. Moreover, we
hope to discern if hGR exhibits its dominant repressive effect on
other members of the closely related subgroup of nuclear receptors that
includes the progesterone, androgen, and mineralocorticoid receptors. We have demonstrated that an alternatively spliced form of the hGR
is present in many different tissues and is able to antagonize the
physiological function of its predominant gene product. Alternative
splicing plays a critical role in regulating the activity of several
other members of the steroid/thyroid/retinoic acid receptor
superfamily. Most closely resembling that observed for hGR and
hGR is the processing that occurs at the thyroid hormone receptor
subunit (TR ) locus. Alternative splicing of the last exon
generates two receptor isoforms, TR 1 and TR 2, that differ at
the carboxyl terminus(36) . The TR 2 isoform does not bind
thyroid hormones, but it represses the transcriptional activity of
TR 1 by competing with TR 1 for binding to the thyroid hormone
receptor responsive elements(36) . Clearly, the ability of
steroid/thyroid/retinoic acid receptor genes to encode transcription
factors with opposing biological activities adds another level of
complexity to the regulation of the function of these receptors.
FOOTNOTES
- *
- The costs of publication of this article were
defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must
therefore by hereby marked ``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
- §
- Supported in part by a National Science
Foundation Graduate Fellowship.
- ¶
- To whom
correspondence should be addressed: National Institute of Environmental
Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD E2-02, Research Triangle Park, NC
27709. Tel.: 919-541-1564. Fax: 919-541-1367.
- (
) - The abbreviations used are: hGR, human
glucocorticoid receptor; GRE, glucocorticoid receptor responsive
elements; hsp90, heat shock protein 90; NLS, nuclear localization
signal; MMTV, mouse mammary tumor virus; DEX, dexamethasone; RU486,
RU38486; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; 3`UTR, 3`-untranslated
region; TR
, thyroid hormone receptor ; RT, reverse
transcriptase; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; kb, kilobase(s); bp,
base pair(s). - (
) - R. H. Oakley and J. A. Cidlowski,
unpublished observations.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Dr. Ron Evans for the hGR clones OB7 and OB10
and Dr. Darryl Zeldin for human liver and lung total RNA. We also
appreciate the technical assistance of Roger Componovo.
REFERENCES
- Hollenberg, S. M.,
Weinberger, C., Ong, E. S., Cerelli, G., Oro, A., Lebo, R., Thompson,
E. B., Rosenfeld, M. G., and Evans, R. M. (1985) Nature 318, 635-641
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Encio, I. J., and
Detera-Wadleigh, S. D. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 7182-7188
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Giguere, V., Hollenberg,
S. M., Rosenfeld, M. G., and Evans, R. M. (1986) Cell 46, 645-652
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Evans, R. M. (1988) Science 240, 889-895
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Carson-Jurica, M. A.,
Schrader, W. T., and O'Malley, B. W. (1990) Endocr. Rev. 11, 201-220
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Yamamoto, K. R. (1985) Annu. Rev. Genet. 19, 209-252
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dalman, F. C., Scherrer,
L. C., Taylor, L. P., Akil, H., and Pratt, W. B. (1991 ) J.
Biol. Chem. 266, 3482-3490
- Picard, D., and Yamamoto,
K. R. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 3333-3340
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dahlman-Wright, K.,
Wright, A. P. H., and Gustafsson, J.-A. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 9040-9044
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hollenberg, S. M., and
Evans, R. M. (1988) Cell 55, 899-906
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Webster, J. C., Jewell,
C. M., Sar, M., and Cidlowski, J. A. (1994) Endocr. J. 2, 967-969
- Pratt, W. B. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21455-21458
[Free Full Text]
- Jonat, G., Rahmsdorf, H.
J., Park, K. K., Cato, A. C., Gebel, S., Ponta, H., and Herrlich, P. (1990) Cell 62, 1189-1204
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Yang Yen, H. F.,
Chambard, J. C., Sun, Y. L., Smeal, T., Schmidt, T. J., Drouin, J., and
Karin, M. (1990) Cell 62, 1205-1215
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schule, R., Rangarajan,
P., Kliewer, S., Ransone, L. J., Bolado, J., Yang, N., Verma, I. M.,
and Evans, R. M. (1990) Cell 62, 1217-1226
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Scheinman, R. I.,
Gualberto, A., Jewell, C. M., Cidlowski, J. A., and Baldwin, A. S. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 943-953
[Abstract]
- Bamberger, C. M.,
Bamberger, A.-M., de Castro, M., and Chrousos, G. P. (1995 )
J. Clin. Invest. 95, 2435-2441
- Andersson, S., Davis, D.
L., Dahlback, H., Jornvall, H., and Russell, D. W. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 8222-8229
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- DeFranco, D., and
Yamamoto, K. R. (1986) Mol. Cell. Biol. 6, 993-1001
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Allgood, V. E., Oakley,
R. H., and Cidlowski, J. A. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 20870-20876
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Luckow, B., and Schutz,
G. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 5490
[Free Full Text]
- Allgood,
V. E., Powell-Oliver, F. E., and Cidlowski, J. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 12424-12433
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Burnstein, K. L.,
Jewell, C. M., Sar, M., and Cidlowski, J. A. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 1764-1773
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tully, D. B., and
Cidlowski, J. A. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 1968-1975
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Cidlowski, J. A.,
Bellingham, D. L., Powell-Oliver, F. E., Lubahn, D. B., and Sar, M. (1990) Mol. Endocrinol. 4, 1427-1437
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sompayrac, L. M., and
Danna, K. J. (1981) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 78, 7575-7578
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gorman, C.
(1985) DNA Cloning: A Practical Approach (Glover, D. M., ed)
Vol. 3, pp. 143-190, IRL Press, Oxford
- Rosewicz, S., McDonald,
A. R., Maddux, B. A., Goldfine, I. D., Miesfeld, R. L., and Logsdon, C.
D. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 2581-2584
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Brandon, D. D.,
Markwick, A. J., Chrousos, G. P., and Loriaux, D. L. (1989) Cancer Res. 49, (suppl.) 2203-2213
- Bronnegard, M., Werner,
S., and Gustafsson, J.-A. (1991) J. Steroid Biochem.
Mol. Biol. 39, 693-701
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Domin, W. S., Chait, A.,
and Deeb, S. S. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 2570-2574
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Zeiner, M., and Gehring,
U. (1993) Cancer Res. 53, 3513-3517
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Denton, R. R., Eisen, L.
P., Elsasser, M. S., and Harmon, J. M. (1993) Endocrinology 133, 248-256
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Devereux, J., Haeberli,
P., and Smithies, O. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 387-395
- Miesfeld, R., Rusconi,
S., Godowski, P. J., Maler, B. A., Okret, S., Wikstrom, A.-C.,
Gustafsson, J.-A., and Yamamoto, K. R. (1986) Cell 46, 389-399
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Koenig, R. J., Lazar, M.
A., Hodin, R. A., Brent, G. A., Larsen, P. R., Chin, W. W., and Moore,
D. (1989) Nature 337, 659-661
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Meyer, M.-E., Pornon,
A., Ji, J., Bocquel, M.-T., Chambon, P., and Gronemeyer, H. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 3923-3930
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kuiper, G. G. J. M.,
Faber, P. W., van Rooij, H. C. J., van der Korput, J. A. G. M.,
Ris-Stalpers, C., Klaassen, P., Trapman, J., and Brinkmann, A. O. (1989) J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2, R1-R4
- Faber, P. W., van Rooij,
H. C. J., van der Korput, H. A. G. M., Baarends, W. M., Brinkmann, A.
O., Grootegoed, J. A., and Trapman, J. (1991) J. Biol.
Chem. 266, 10743-10749
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Green, S., Walter, P.,
Kumar, V., Krust, A., Bornert, J.-M., Argos, P., and Chambon, P. (1986) Nature 320, 134-139
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ponglikitmongkol, M.,
Green, S., and Chambon, P. (1988) EMBO J. 7, 3385-3388
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Jeltsch, J.-M.,
Turcotte, B., Garnier, J.-M., Lerouge, T., Krozowski, Z., Gronemeyer,
H., and Chambon, P. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 3967-3974
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Jackson, R. J., and
Standart, N. (1990) Cell 62, 15-24
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Jackson, R. J. (1993) Cell 74, 9-14
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Chakraborti, P. K.,
Garabedian, M. J., Yamamoto, K. R., and Simons, S. S., Jr.
(1991 ) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 22075-22078
- Warriar, N., Yu, C.,
Govindan, M. V. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 29010-29015
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Rusconi, S., and
Yamamoto, K. R. (1987) EMBO J. 6, 1309-1315
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Danielsen, M., Northrop,
J. P., and Ringold, G. M. (1986) EMBO J. 5, 2513-2522
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hollenberg, S. M.,
Giguere, V., and Evans, R. M. (1989) Cancer Res. 49, (suppl.) 2292-2294
- Hurley, D. M., Accili,
D., Stratakis, C. A., Karl, M., Vamvakopoulos, N., Rorer, E.,
Constantine, K., Taylor, S. I., and Chrousos, G. P. (1991) J. Clin. Invest. 87, 680-686
- Vegeto, E., Allan, G.
F., Schrader, W. T., Tsai, M.-J., McDonnell, D. P., and O'Malley,
B. W. (1992) Cell 69, 703-713
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Picard, D., Salser, S.
J., and Yamamoto, K. R. (1988) Cell 54, 1073-1080
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Scherrer, L. C., Picard,
D., Massa, E., Harmon, J. M., Simons, S. S., Yamamoto, K. R., and
Pratt, W. B. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 5381-5386
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. De Bosscher and G. Haegeman
Minireview: Latest Perspectives on Antiinflammatory Actions of Glucocorticoids
Mol. Endocrinol.,
March 1, 2009;
23(3):
281 - 291.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. C. Chung, L. Shimmin, S. Natarajan, C. L. Hanis, E. Boerwinkle, and J. E. Hixson
Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene Variant in the 3' Untranslated Region Is Associated with Multiple Measures of Blood Pressure
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
January 1, 2009;
94(1):
268 - 276.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Kamiyama, N. Matsuda, S. Yamamoto, K.-i. Takano, Y. Takano, H. Yamazaki, S.-i. Kageyama, H. Yokoo, T. Nagata, N. Hatakeyama, et al.
Modulation of glucocorticoid receptor expression, inflammation, and cell apoptosis in septic guinea pig lungs using methylprednisolone
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
December 1, 2008;
295(6):
L998 - L1006.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Zhou, R. H. Oakley, and J. A. Cidlowski
DAX-1 (Dosage-Sensitive Sex Reversal-Adrenal Hypoplasia Congenita Critical Region on the X-Chromosome, Gene 1) Selectively Inhibits Transactivation But Not Transrepression Mediated by the Glucocorticoid Receptor in a LXXLL-Dependent Manner
Mol. Endocrinol.,
July 1, 2008;
22(7):
1521 - 1534.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Root, J. Abrassart, D. A. Myers, T. Monau, and C. A. Ducsay
Expression and Distribution of Glucocorticoid Receptors in the Ovine Fetal Adrenal Cortex: Effect of Long-term Hypoxia
Reproductive Sciences,
May 1, 2008;
15(5):
517 - 528.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. M. Schaaf, D. Champagne, I. H. C. van Laanen, D. C. W. A. van Wijk, A. H. Meijer, O. C. Meijer, H. P. Spaink, and M. K. Richardson
Discovery of a Functional Glucocorticoid Receptor {beta}-Isoform in Zebrafish
Endocrinology,
April 1, 2008;
149(4):
1591 - 1599.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Zhang, A. F. Clark, and T. Yorio
FK506-Binding Protein 51 Regulates Nuclear Transport of the Glucocorticoid Receptor {beta} and Glucocorticoid Responsiveness
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
March 1, 2008;
49(3):
1037 - 1047.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Tliba, Y. Amrani, and R. A. Panettieri Jr
Is Airway Smooth Muscle the "Missing Link" Modulating Airway Inflammation in Asthma?
Chest,
January 1, 2008;
133(1):
236 - 242.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Tliba and Y. Amrani
Airway Smooth Muscle Cell as an Inflammatory Cell: Lessons Learned from Interferon Signaling Pathways
Proceedings of the ATS,
January 1, 2008;
5(1):
106 - 112.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L.-b. Li, D. Y. M. Leung, M. J. Strand, and E. Goleva
ATF2 impairs glucocorticoid receptor mediated transactivation in human CD8+ T cells
Blood,
September 1, 2007;
110(5):
1570 - 1577.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H.-Y. Lee, T. J Acosta, M. Tanikawa, R. Sakumoto, J. Komiyama, Y. Tasaki, M. Piskula, D. J Skarzynski, M. Tetsuka, and K. Okuda
The role of glucocorticoid in the regulation of prostaglandin biosynthesis in non-pregnant bovine endometrium
J. Endocrinol.,
April 1, 2007;
193(1):
127 - 135.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Kozaci, Y. Chernajovsky, and I. C. Chikanza
The differential expression of corticosteroid receptor isoforms in corticosteroid-resistant and -sensitive patients with rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology,
April 1, 2007;
46(4):
579 - 585.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. J. Lewis-Tuffin, C. M. Jewell, R. J. Bienstock, J. B. Collins, and J. A. Cidlowski
Human Glucocorticoid Receptor {beta} Binds RU-486 and Is Transcriptionally Active
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
March 15, 2007;
27(6):
2266 - 2282.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Russcher, V. A S H Dalm, F. H de Jong, A. O Brinkmann, L. J Hofland, S. W J Lamberts, and J. W Koper
Associations between promoter usage and alternative splicing of the glucocorticoid receptor gene
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
January 1, 2007;
38(1):
91 - 98.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Z. Lu, S. E. Wardell, K. L. Burnstein, D. Defranco, P. J. Fuller, V. Giguere, R. B. Hochberg, L. McKay, J.-M. Renoir, N. L. Weigel, et al.
International Union of Pharmacology. LXV. The Pharmacology and Classification of the Nuclear Receptor Superfamily: Glucocorticoid, Mineralocorticoid, Progesterone, and Androgen Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev.,
December 1, 2006;
58(4):
782 - 797.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Derfoul, G. L. Perkins, D. J. Hall, and R. S. Tuan
Glucocorticoids Promote Chondrogenic Differentiation of Adult Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells by Enhancing Expression of Cartilage Extracellular Matrix Genes
Stem Cells,
June 1, 2006;
24(6):
1487 - 1495.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L.-b. Li, D. Y. M. Leung, C. F. Hall, and E. Goleva
Divergent expression and function of glucocorticoid receptor {beta} in human monocytes and T cells
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
April 1, 2006;
79(4):
818 - 827.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S-I Okazaki, M Yamakawa, K Maeda, N Ohta, and M Aoyagi
Expression of glucocorticoid receptors in non-neoplastic lymphoid follicles and B cell type malignant lymphomas
J. Clin. Pathol.,
April 1, 2006;
59(4):
410 - 416.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Goleva, L.-b. Li, P. T. Eves, M. J. Strand, R. J. Martin, and D. Y. M. Leung
Increased Glucocorticoid Receptor beta Alters Steroid Response in Glucocorticoid-insensitive Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
March 15, 2006;
173(6):
607 - 616.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Goikoetxea, J. Beaumont, A. Gonzalez, B. Lopez, R. Querejeta, M. Larman, and J. Diez
Altered cardiac expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-isoforms in patients with hypertensive heart disease
Cardiovasc Res,
March 1, 2006;
69(4):
899 - 907.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Zhang, A. F. Clark, and T. Yorio
Heat Shock Protein 90 Is an Essential Molecular Chaperone for Nuclear Transport of Glucocorticoid Receptor {beta}
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
February 1, 2006;
47(2):
700 - 708.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J E Sanchez-Criado, J M. de las Mulas, C Bellido, V M Navarro, R Aguilar, J C Garrido-Gracia, M M Malagon, M Tena-Sempere, and A Blanco
Gonadotropin-secreting cells in ovariectomized rats treated with different oestrogen receptor ligands: a modulatory role for ER{beta} in the gonadotrope?
J. Endocrinol.,
February 1, 2006;
188(2):
167 - 177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Tliba, J. A. Cidlowski, and Y. Amrani
CD38 Expression Is Insensitive to Steroid Action in Cells Treated with Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha} and Interferon-{gamma} by a Mechanism Involving the Up-Regulation of the Glucocorticoid Receptor beta Isoform
Mol. Pharmacol.,
February 1, 2006;
69(2):
588 - 596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. N. Dhir, W. Dworakowski, C. Thangavel, and B. H. Shapiro
Sexually Dimorphic Regulation of Hepatic Isoforms of Human Cytochrome P450 by Growth Hormone
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
January 1, 2006;
316(1):
87 - 94.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Zhang, A. F. Clark, and T. Yorio
Regulation of Glucocorticoid Responsiveness in Glaucomatous Trabecular Meshwork Cells by Glucocorticoid Receptor-{beta}
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
December 1, 2005;
46(12):
4607 - 4616.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hagendorf, J. W. Koper, F. H. de Jong, A. O. Brinkmann, S. W. J. Lamberts, and R. A. Feelders
Expression of the Human Glucocorticoid Receptor Splice Variants {alpha}, {beta}, and P in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Leukocytes in Healthy Controls and in Patients with Hyper- and Hypocortisolism
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
November 1, 2005;
90(11):
6237 - 6243.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. D Turner and C. P Muller
Structure of the glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) gene 5' untranslated region: identification, and tissue distribution of multiple new human exon 1
J. Mol. Endocrinol.,
October 1, 2005;
35(2):
283 - 292.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Russcher, E. F. C. van Rossum, F. H. de Jong, A. O. Brinkmann, S. W. J. Lamberts, and J. W. Koper
Increased Expression of the Glucocorticoid Receptor-A Translational Isoform as a Result of the ER22/23EK Polymorphism
Mol. Endocrinol.,
July 1, 2005;
19(7):
1687 - 1696.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Fruchter, T. Kino, E. Zoumakis, S. Alesci, M. De Martino, G. Chrousos, and Z. Hochberg
The Human Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR) Isoform {beta} Differentially Suppresses GR{alpha}-Induced Transactivation Stimulated by Synthetic Glucocorticoids
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
June 1, 2005;
90(6):
3505 - 3509.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Charmandari, G. P. Chrousos, T. Ichijo, N. Bhattacharyya, A. Vottero, E. Souvatzoglou, and T. Kino
The Human Glucocorticoid Receptor (hGR) {beta} Isoform Suppresses the Transcriptional Activity of hGR{alpha} by Interfering with Formation of Active Coactivator Complexes
Mol. Endocrinol.,
January 1, 2005;
19(1):
52 - 64.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Belvisi
Regulation of Inflammatory Cell Function by Corticosteroids
Proceedings of the ATS,
November 1, 2004;
1(3):
207 - 214.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. M. Necela and J. A. Cidlowski
Mechanisms of Glucocorticoid Receptor Action in Noninflammatory and Inflammatory Cells
Proceedings of the ATS,
November 1, 2004;
1(3):
239 - 246.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. C. Chikanza and D. L. Kozaci
Corticosteroid resistance in rheumatoid arthritis: molecular and cellular perspectives
Rheumatology,
November 1, 2004;
43(11):
1337 - 1345.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
X. Jiang, M. Norman, L. Roth, and X. Li
Protein-DNA Array-based Identification of Transcription Factor Activities Regulated by Interaction with the Glucocorticoid Receptor
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 10, 2004;
279(37):
38480 - 38485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. T. Rae, D. Niven, H. O. D. Critchley, C. R. Harlow, and S. G. Hillier
Antiinflammatory Steroid Action in Human Ovarian Surface Epithelial Cells
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
September 1, 2004;
89(9):
4538 - 4544.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Torrego, L. Pujols, J. Roca-Ferrer, J. Mullol, A. Xaubet, and C. Picado
Glucocorticoid Receptor Isoforms {alpha} and {beta} in in Vitro Cytokine-induced Glucocorticoid Insensitivity
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
August 15, 2004;
170(4):
420 - 425.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L Pujols, A Xaubet, J Ramirez, J Mullol, J Roca-Ferrer, A Torrego, J A Cidlowski, and C Picado
Expression of glucocorticoid receptors {alpha} and {beta} in steroid sensitive and steroid insensitive interstitial lung diseases
Thorax,
August 1, 2004;
59(8):
687 - 693.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. U. De Martino, N. Bhattachryya, S. Alesci, T. Ichijo, G. P. Chrousos, and T. Kino
The Glucocorticoid Receptor and the Orphan Nuclear Receptor Chicken Ovalbumin Upstream Promoter-Transcription Factor II Interact with and Mutually Affect Each Other's Transcriptional Activities: Implications for Intermediary Metabolism
Mol. Endocrinol.,
April 1, 2004;
18(4):
820 - 833.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. R. Faucette, H. Wang, G. A. Hamilton, S. L. Jolley, D. Gilbert, C. Lindley, B. Yan, M. Negishi, and E. L. LeCluyse
REGULATION OF CYP2B6 IN PRIMARY HUMAN HEPATOCYTES BY PROTOTYPICAL INDUCERS
Drug Metab. Dispos.,
March 1, 2004;
32(3):
348 - 358.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Kunz, R. Sandoval, P. Carlsson, J. Carlstedt-Duke, J. W. Bloom, and R. L. Miesfeld
Identification of a Novel Glucocorticoid Receptor Mutation in Budesonide-Resistant Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells
Mol. Endocrinol.,
December 1, 2003;
17(12):
2566 - 2582.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Hanoux, H. Bouraima, H. Mittre, C. Feral, and A. Benhaim
Differential Regulation of Two 3' End Variants of P450 Aromatase Transcripts and of a New Truncated Aromatase Protein in Rabbit Preovulatory Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology,
November 1, 2003;
144(11):
4790 - 4798.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Xu, D. Y. M. Leung, and K. O. Kisich
Serine-Arginine-rich Protein p30 Directs Alternative Splicing of Glucocorticoid Receptor Pre-mRNA to Glucocorticoid Receptor {beta} in Neutrophils
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 11, 2003;
278(29):
27112 - 27118.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Kino, E. Souvatzoglou, M. U. De Martino, M. Tsopanomihalu, Y. Wan, and G. P. Chrousos
Protein 14-3-3{sigma} Interacts with and Favors Cytoplasmic Subcellular Localization of the Glucocorticoid Receptor, Acting as a Negative Regulator of the Glucocorticoid Signaling Pathway
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 3, 2003;
278(28):
25651 - 25656.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Yudt, C. M. Jewell, R. J. Bienstock, and J. A. Cidlowski
Molecular Origins for the Dominant Negative Function of Human Glucocorticoid Receptor Beta
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
June 15, 2003;
23(12):
4319 - 4330.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Gupta and B. J. Wagner
Expression of the Functional Glucocorticoid Receptor in Mouse and Human Lens Epithelial Cells
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.,
May 1, 2003;
44(5):
2041 - 2046.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Suzuki, K. Koyama, A. Darnel, H. Ishibashi, S. Kobayashi, H. Kubo, T. Suzuki, H. Sasano, and Z. S. Krozowski
Dexamethasone Upregulates 11{beta}-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Type 2 in BEAS-2B Cells
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
May 1, 2003;
167(9):
1244 - 1249.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. M. Schaaf and J. A. Cidlowski
Molecular Determinants of Glucocorticoid Receptor Mobility in Living Cells: the Importance of Ligand Affinity
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
March 15, 2003;
23(6):
1922 - 1934.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Lindberg, S. Moverare, S. Skrtic, H. Gao, K. Dahlman-Wright, J.-A. Gustafsson, and C. Ohlsson
Estrogen Receptor (ER)-{beta} Reduces ER{alpha}-Regulated Gene Transcription, Supporting a "Ying Yang" Relationship between ER{alpha} and ER{beta} in Mice
Mol. Endocrinol.,
February 1, 2003;
17(2):
203 - 208.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Pujols, J. Mullol, J. Roca-Ferrer, A. Torrego, A. Xaubet, J. A. Cidlowski, and C. Picado
Expression of glucocorticoid receptor alpha - and beta -isoforms in human cells and tissues
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
October 1, 2002;
283(4):
C1324 - C1331.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. J. Hauk, E. Goleva, I. Strickland, A. Vottero, G. P. Chrousos, K. O. Kisich, and D. Y. M. Leung
Increased Glucocorticoid Receptor {beta} Expression Converts Mouse Hybridoma Cells to a Corticosteroid-Insensitive Phenotype
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
September 1, 2002;
27(3):
361 - 367.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Yudt and J. A. Cidlowski
The Glucocorticoid Receptor: Coding a Diversity of Proteins and Responses through a Single Gene
Mol. Endocrinol.,
August 1, 2002;
16(8):
1719 - 1726.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Vottero, T. Kino, H. Combe, P. Lecomte, and G. P. Chrousos
A Novel, C-Terminal Dominant Negative Mutation of the GR Causes Familial Glucocorticoid Resistance through Abnormal Interactions with p160 Steroid Receptor Coactivators
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
June 1, 2002;
87(6):
2658 - 2667.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. T. K. Saunders, M. R. Millar, S. Macpherson, D. S. Irvine, N. P. Groome, L. R. Evans, R. M. Sharpe, and G. A. Scobie
ER{beta}1 and the ER{beta}2 Splice Variant (ER{beta}cx/{beta}2) Are Expressed in Distinct Cell Populations in the Adult Human Testis
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
June 1, 2002;
87(6):
2706 - 2715.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Chesnokova and S. Melmed
Minireview: Neuro-Immuno-Endocrine Modulation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis by gp130 Signaling Molecules
Endocrinology,
May 1, 2002;
143(5):
1571 - 1574.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. B. Whorwood, S. J. Donovan, D. Flanagan, D. I.W. Phillips, and C. D. Byrne
Increased Glucocorticoid Receptor Expression in Human Skeletal Muscle Cells May Contribute to the Pathogenesis of the Metabolic Syndrome
Diabetes,
April 1, 2002;
51(4):
1066 - 1075.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. A. Patel and J. R. G. Challis
Cortisol/Progesterone Antagonism in Regulation of 15-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase Activity and mRNA Levels in Human Chorion and Placental Trophoblast Cells at Term
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
February 1, 2002;
87(2):
700 - 708.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. R. Yudt and J. A. Cidlowski
Molecular Identification and Characterization of A and B Forms of the Glucocorticoid Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol.,
July 1, 2001;
15(7):
1093 - 1103.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Webster, R. H. Oakley, C. M. Jewell, and J. A. Cidlowski
Proinflammatory cytokines regulate human glucocorticoid receptor gene expression and lead to the accumulation of the dominant negative beta isoform: A mechanism for the generation of glucocorticoid resistance
PNAS,
May 24, 2001;
(2001)
121455098.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Strickland, K. Kisich, P. J. Hauk, A. Vottero, G. P. Chrousos, D. J. Klemm, and D. Y.M. Leung
High Constitutive Glucocorticoid Receptor {beta} in Human Neutrophils Enables Them to Reduce Their Spontaneous Rate of Cell Death in Response to Corticosteroids
J. Exp. Med.,
February 26, 2001;
193(5):
585 - 594.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Mathieu
IS THERE A ROLE FOR GLUCOCORTICOID RECEPTOR BETA IN GLUCOCORTICOID-DEPENDENT ASTHMATICS?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
February 1, 2001;
163(2):
585b - 585.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Farman and M.-E. Rafestin-Oblin
Multiple aspects of mineralocorticoid selectivity
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
February 1, 2001;
280(2):
F181 - F192.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Pujols, J. Mullol, M. Pérez, J. Roca-Ferrer, M. Juan, A. Xaubet, J. A. Cidlowski, and C. Picado
Expression of the Human Glucocorticoid Receptor {alpha} and {beta} Isoforms in Human Respiratory Epithelial Cells and Their Regulation by Dexamethasone
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
January 1, 2001;
24(1):
49 - 57.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Quaia, P. Zancai, R. Cariati, S. Rizzo, M. Boiocchi, and R. Dolcetti
Glucocorticoids promote the proliferation and antagonize the retinoic acid-mediated growth suppression of Epstein-Barr virus-immortalized B lymphocytes
Blood,
July 15, 2000;
96(2):
711 - 718.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Y. M. LEUNG and G. P. CHROUSOS
Is There a Role for Glucocorticoid Receptor Beta in Glucocorticoid-dependent Asthmatics?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
July 1, 2000;
162(1):
1 - 3.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. GAGLIARDO, P. CHANEZ, A. M. VIGNOLA, J. BOUSQUET, I. VACHIER, P. GODARD, G. BONSIGNORE, P. DEMOLY, and M. MATHIEU
Glucocorticoid Receptor alpha and beta in Glucocorticoid Dependent Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
July 1, 2000;
162(1):
7 - 13.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Vaxillaire, A. Abderrahmani, P. Boutin, B. Bailleul, P. Froguel, M. Yaniv, and M. Pontoglio
Anatomy of a Homeoprotein Revealed by the Analysis of Human MODY3 Mutations
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 10, 1999;
274(50):
35639 - 35646.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. M. Hall and D. P. McDonnell
The Estrogen Receptor {beta}-Isoform (ER{beta}) of the Human Estrogen Receptor Modulates ER{alpha} Transcriptional Activity and Is a Key Regulator of the Cellular Response to Estrogens and Antiestrogens
Endocrinology,
December 1, 1999;
140(12):
5566 - 5578.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H. Oakley, C. M. Jewell, M. R. Yudt, D. M. Bofetiado, and J. A. Cidlowski
The Dominant Negative Activity of the Human Glucocorticoid Receptor beta Isoform. SPECIFICITY AND MECHANISMS OF ACTION
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 24, 1999;
274(39):
27857 - 27866.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Gervois, I. P. Torra, G. Chinetti, T. Grötzinger, G. Dubois, J.-C. Fruchart, J. Fruchart-Najib, E. Leitersdorf, and B. Staels
A Truncated Human Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor {alpha} Splice Variant with Dominant Negative Activity
Mol. Endocrinol.,
September 1, 1999;
13(9):
1535 - 1549.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. I. McKay and J. A. Cidlowski
Molecular Control of Immune/Inflammatory Responses: Interactions Between Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B and Steroid Receptor-Signaling Pathways
Endocr. Rev.,
August 1, 1999;
20(4):
435 - 459.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. A. HAMID, S. E. WENZEL, P. J. HAUK, A. TSICOPOULOS, B. WALLAERT, J.-J. LAFITTE, G. P. CHROUSOS, S. J. SZEFLER, and D. Y. M. LEUNG
Increased Glucocorticoid Receptor beta in Airway Cells of Glucocorticoid-insensitive Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
May 1, 1999;
159(5):
1600 - 1604.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Reynolds, Y. Ruan, D. F. Smith, and J. G. Scammell
Glucocorticoid Resistance in the Squirrel Monkey Is Associated with Overexpression of the Immunophilin FKBP51
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
February 1, 1999;
84(2):
663 - 669.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-P. Tseng, B. D. Ely, Y. Li, R.-C. Pong, and J.-T. Hsieh
Regulation of Rat DOC-2 Gene during Castration-Induced Rat Ventral Prostate Degeneration and Its Growth Inhibitory Function in Human Prostatic Carcinoma Cells
Endocrinology,
August 1, 1998;
139(8):
3542 - 3553.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. R. de Kloet, E. Vreugdenhil, M. S. Oitzl, and M. Joëls
Brain Corticosteroid Receptor Balance in Health and Disease
Endocr. Rev.,
June 1, 1998;
19(3):
269 - 301.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Panarelli, C. D. Holloway, R. Fraser, J. M. C. Connell, M. C. Ingram, N. H. Anderson, and C. J. Kenyon
Glucocorticoid Receptor Polymorphism, Skin Vasoconstriction, and Other Metabolic Intermediate Phenotypes in Normal Human Subjects
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
June 1, 1998;
83(6):
1846 - 1852.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Y.M. Leung, Q. Hamid, A. Vottero, S. J. Szefler, W. Surs, E. Minshall, G. P. Chrousos, and D. J. Klemm
Association of Glucocorticoid Insensitivity with Increased Expression of Glucocorticoid Receptor beta
J. Exp. Med.,
November 3, 1997;
186(9):
1567 - 1574.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H. Oakley, J. C. Webster, M. Sar, C. R. Parker Jr., and J. A. Cidlowski
Expression and Subcellular Distribution of the {beta}-Isoform of the Human Glucocorticoid Receptor
Endocrinology,
November 1, 1997;
138(11):
5028 - 5038.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Hecht, J. Carlstedt-Duke, P. Stierna, J.-A. Gustafsson, M. Bronnegard, and A.-C. Wikstrom
Evidence That the beta -Isoform of the Human Glucocorticoid Receptor Does Not Act as a Physiologically Significant Repressor
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 1997;
272(42):
26659 - 26664.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Otto, H. M. Reichardt, and G. Schutz
Absence of Glucocorticoid Receptor-beta in Mice
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 17, 1997;
272(42):
26665 - 26668.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Gong, S. Chávez, and M. Beato
Point Mutation in the Ligand-Binding Domain of the Progesterone Receptor Generates a Transdominant Negative Phenotype
Mol. Endocrinol.,
September 1, 1997;
11(10):
1476 - 1485.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. L. M. Dahia, J. Honegger, M. Reincke, R. A. Jacobs, A. Mirtella, R. Fahlbusch, G. M. Besser, S. L. Chew, and A. B. Grossman
Expression of Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene Isoforms in Corticotropin-Secreting Tumors
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
April 1, 1997;
82(4):
1088 - 1093.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Reynolds, S. J. Pittler, and J. G. Scammell
Cloning and Expression of the Glucocorticoid Receptor from the Squirrel Monkey (Saimiri boliviensis boliviensis), a Glucocorticoid-Resistant Primate
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.,
February 1, 1997;
82(2):
465 - 472.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Massaad, M. Paradon, C. Jacques, C. Salvat, G. Bereziat, F. Berenbaum, and J.-L. Olivier
Induction of Secreted Type IIA Phospholipase A2 Gene Transcription by Interleukin-1beta . ROLE OF C/EBP FACTORS
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 21, 2000;
275(30):
22686 - 22694.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Webster, R. H. Oakley, C. M. Jewell, and J. A. Cidlowski
Proinflammatory cytokines regulate human glucocorticoid receptor gene expression and lead to the accumulation of the dominant negative beta isoform: A mechanism for the generation of glucocorticoid resistance
PNAS,
June 5, 2001;
98(12):
6865 - 6870.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|