|
Volume 271,
Number 21,
Issue of May 24, 1996 pp. 12294-12301
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Biosynthesis
of Lantibiotic Nisin
POSTTRANSLATIONAL MODIFICATION OF ITS PREPEPTIDE OCCURS AT A
MULTIMERIC MEMBRANE-ASSOCIATED LANTHIONINE SYNTHETASE COMPLEX (*)
(Received for publication, January 25,
1996)
Katja
Siegers (§),
,
Stefan
Heinzmann
,
Karl-Dieter
Entian (¶)
From the Institute for Microbiology, Johann Wolfgang
Goethe-Universität, Marie-Curie Straße 9,
60439 Frankfurt am Main, Federal Republic of Germany
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The lantibiotic nisin of Lactococcus lactis is matured
from a ribosomally synthesized prepeptide by post-translational
modification. Genetic and biochemical evidence suggests that genes nisB and nisC of the nisin gene cluster encode
proteins necessary for prenisin modification. Inactivation of both
genes resulted in complete loss of nisin production. The preparation of
membrane vesicles revealed that NisB and NisC are attached to the
cellular membrane, and co-immunoprecipitation experiments showed that
they are associated with each other. By using the yeast two-hybrid
system, which is a highly sensitive method to unravel protein-protein
interactions, we could show that the nisin prepeptide physically
interacts with the NisC protein, suggesting that NisC contains a
binding site for prenisin. This was also confirmed by
co-immunoprecipitation of the NisC protein and the NisA prepeptide by
antibodies directed against the leader sequence of the nisin
prepeptide. The two-hybrid analysis also confirmed the interaction
between NisB and NisC as well as the interaction between NisC and the
NisT ABC transporter. A minor interaction was also indicated between
prenisin and the NisB protein. Furthermore, the two-hybrid
investigations also revealed that at least two molecules of NisC and
two molecules of NisT are part of the modification and transport
complex. Our results suggest that lantibiotic maturation and secretion
occur at a membrane-associated multimeric lanthionine synthetase
complex consisting of proteins NisB, NisC, and the ABC transporter
molecules NisT.
INTRODUCTION
Nisin is a ribosomally synthesized peptide antibiotic containing
the unusual amino acids lanthionine, dehydrobutyrine, and
dehydroalanine(1, 2) . It belongs to a class of
peptide antibiotics that is referred to as lantibiotics because of
their characteristic thioether bridges consisting of meso-lanthionine and 3-methyl-lanthionine. Nisin
occurs naturally in dairy products (3) and is used as a food
preservative because it exhibits high levels of antimicrobial activity
against several pathogenic Gram-positive bacteria, such as
staphylococci, streptococci, and clostridia(4) . The
bactericidal action of nisin and other lantibiotics is mainly caused by
pore formation in the cytoplasmic
membrane(5, 6, 7) . Nisin, like the other
lantibiotics described so far is ribosomally synthesized. The primary
transcript of the nisin structural gene nisA encodes a
57-amino acid prepeptide, which consists of a N-terminal leader
sequence followed by the C-terminal propeptide from which the
lantibiotic is matured(1, 2) . Based on the results
of Ingram (8) the following model was proposed for the
formation of the unusual amino acids. First, a dehydratase reaction
occurs at serine and threonine residues, resulting in amino acids
dehydroalanine and dehydrobutyrine, respectively. Thereafter, sulfur
from neighboring cysteine residues is added to the double bonds,
resulting in meso-lanthionine and 3-methyl-lanthionine,
respectively. After the isolation of the first lantibiotic structural
gene (epiA for epidermin) it was stated that maturation
reactions occur at the prepeptide(9) . This hypothesis was
supported by the isolation of prepeptides containing
dehydroalanine(10) . The genes for the biosynthesis of nisin
are located on a 70-kilobase pair conjugative transposon(11) ,
which also contains the genetic information for sucrose metabolism.
Several genes encoding proteins that are involved in the biosynthesis,
secretion, and immunity of different lantibiotics have been
characterized (for reviews see Refs. 12, 13, and 51). Proteins encoded
by the genes nisB, nisT, nisC, nisI, nisP, nisR, nisK, nisF, nisE, and nisG have been found to be
homologous to respective gene products of the
subtilin(14, 15, 16, 17, 18) ,
epidermin(19, 20, 21, 22) ,
gallidermin (23) or Pep5 (24, 25) gene
clusters. Gene deletion experiments of the genes spaB, spaC, spaT, spaR, and spaK in Bacillus subtilis have proven that they are essential for
subtilin biosynthesis(15, 17, 18) . Like epiP, nisP codes for a subtilisin-like serine
protease that is involved in processing of the post-translational
modified prenisin(22, 26, 27, 28) .
For nisI, nisF, nisE, and nisG we
recently demonstrated an involvement in the self-protection mechanism
of the producer against nisin(29) . Similar results have also
been found for the respective genes of the subtilin-producing strain B. subtilis(16) . Many lantibiotic-producing
strains have three genes in common considered as lanB, lanC, and lanT. With respect to nisin biosynthesis,
the nisT gene encodes a protein of 600 amino acid residues
with an predicted molecular mass of 69 kDa. Its gene product shares
strong homology with several ATP-dependent transport proteins having
two ATP-binding sites and a very hydrophobic region at the N terminus
with six potential membrane-spanning domains(26) . The NisT
protein is expected to be necessary for the secretion of the modified
nisin peptide. Proteins encoded by genes nisB and nisC share no homologies with other known proteins in the data bases
except similar gene products of other lantibiotic-producing strains. As
the functions of all other gene products found in lantibiotic gene
clusters became obvious by their similarities to previously described
proteins and by biochemical experiments, lanB and lanC most likely encode the proteins catalyzing the modification
reactions. Here we report on genetic and biochemical experiments
proving the existence of a membrane-bound maturation complex, which we
name lanthionine synthetase. These results were obtained by two
independent experimental approaches. To prove any interactions between
the nisin-prepeptide and its possible maturation proteins we used the
yeast two-hybrid system, which is a highly sensitive method to unravel
protein-protein interactions(30, 31) . This test
system detects the functional reconstitution of GAL4, a transcriptional
activator from yeast. The interaction of two hybrid proteins, one
bearing the GAL4 DNA binding domain and the other fused to the
transcriptional activation domain of GAL4, creates a functional
activator by bringing the activation domain into close proximity with
the DNA binding domain. This results in transcriptional activation of a lacZ reporter gene containing upstream GAL4 binding sites.
Independently, co-immunoprecipitation experiments also confirmed the
physical interactions indicated by the two-hybrid system. Our results
suggest that this multimeric protein complex consists of NisB and at
least two NisC subunits for the modification of the prepeptide and in
analogy with other bacterial ABC transporters two NisT transporter
subunits (32) .
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains and MediaThe plasmid-free
nisin-nonproducing strain L. lactis MG1614 ((33) ;
kindly provided by M. Gasson, Norwich, United Kingdom) and the
nisin-producing strains L. lactis 6F3 (kindly provided by T.
Hörner, Tübingen, Germany) and L. lactis KS100 (34) were grown at 30 °C in M17
broth supplemented with 0.5% (w/v) sucrose (SM17) or with 0.5% (w/v)
glucose (GM17). Micrococcus luteus ATCC 9341 was used as a
test strain in nisin assays. M. luteus was also grown at 30
°C in GM17 medium. Recombinant plasmids were amplified in Escherichia coli RR1 (F hsd520 supE44
ara-14 proA2 lacY1 galK2 rpsL20 xyl-5 mtl-1) and DH5 (supE44 lacU169 [ 80 lacZ M15] hsdR17 recA1 endA1 gyrA96 thi-1
relA1). E. coli strains were grown at 37 °C in
Luria-Bertani medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Neu-Isenburg, Germany).
If antibiotics were used, the following concentrations were employed:
ampicillin, 40 µg/ml; erythromycin, 150 µg/ml for E. coli and 5
µg/ml for L. lactis; chloramphenicol, 20 µg/ml for E. coli and 5 µg/ml for L. lactis. Yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae SFY-526 (MATa, ura3-52, his3-200, ade2&ndash
;101, lys2-801, trp1-901, leu2-3, 112, can , gal4-542, gal80-538,
URA3::GAL1-lacZ) was used in the two-hybrid assay to monitor
protein-protein interactions. The composition of yeast-rich medium and
synthetic complete medium has been previously described (35) .
As a carbon source 4% glucose or 4% galactose was added. Transformants
were recovered on synthetic complete medium supplemented with the
required amino acids.
PlasmidsThe vectors pUC19 (36) and
pBSKRII (Stratagene, Heidelberg, Germany) were used for cloning
purposes in E. coli. In S. cerevisiae the plasmids
pGBT9 and pGAD424 (30, 31) were used to express
fusion proteins with the GAL4-binding domain and the GAL4-activation
domain, respectively.
Molecular Biology TechniquesEstablished protocols
were followed for molecular biology techniques(37) . DNA was
cleaved according to the conditions recommended by the commercial
supplier of the restriction enzymes (Boehringer GmbH, Mannheim,
Germany). Restriction endonuclease-digested DNA was eluted from 0.7%
agarose gels by the freeze-squeeze method(38) .
Plasmid Isolation and PCR( )The
procedure of Birnboim and Doly (39) was followed to isolate the
plasmids of E. coli. When necessary, these were purified by
use of an ultramicrocentrifuge (Beckman TL 100, rotor TLA 100.2) at
80,000 rpm for 12 h. PCR was carried out by following standard
procedures (37) in an Eppendorff Microcycler E apparatus. By
using Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer), 35 cycles were
performed with 20 s at 94 °C followed by 20 s at 55 °C and
finally by 2.5 min at 72 °C.
Southern HybridizationSouthern blots were carried
out according to Southern(40) . For Southern hybridization
double-stranded DNA fragments were labeled by nick translation using
[ P]ATP and DNA polymerase I (Boehringer), as
described by Sambrook et al.(37) .
Transformation of S. cerevisiaeTransformation of
yeast was carried out by using the bicine method described by Klebe et al.(41) .
Two-hybrid AssayIn order to observe interactions
between proteins that are involved in nisin maturation we used the
yeast two-hybrid system(30, 31) . DNA fragments used
to construct fusion proteins with the DNA binding and transcriptional
activating domains of GAL4 were obtained by PCR using chromosomal DNA
of L. lactis 6F3 as template (Table 1). Plasmids derived
from pGBT9 and pGAD424 encoding the two hybrid proteins were
cotransformed into a yeast strain harboring a lacZ reporter
gene containing upstream GAL4 binding sites and assayed for
-galactosidase activity.
-Galactosidase AssayFor qualitative studies
-galactosidase filter assays were carried out. After 2-4
days of growth at 30 °C, yeast transformants were transferred to
sterile filters soaked in selection medium. Filters were placed on
plates containing selection medium, and the colonies were allowed to
continue to grow for an additional 2-3 days at 30 °C. The
filter assay for -galactosidase activity was carried out as
follows. A filter with yeast transformants on top was lifted off
carefully from the agar plate and transferred (colonies facing up) to a
pool of liquid nitrogen. The frozen filter (after 5 s) was removed from
the nitrogen and allowed to thaw at room temperature. The filter with
permeabilized cells was placed colony side up on another filter that
was presoaked in a Z buffer/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl
-D-galactoside solution (25 ml of Z buffer (60 mM Na HOP , 40 mM Na PO , 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO , pH 7), 70 µl of -mercaptoethanol, 420
µl of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl -D-galactoside
solution, 100 mg of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indoyl
-D-galactopyranoside in 1 ml of N,N-dimethylformamide). The filters were incubated at
30 °C and checked periodically for the appearance of blue colonies.
For quantitative studies, yeast strains were grown to stationary phase
in synthetic medium lacking leucine and tryptophan, diluted to 5
10 cells/ml, and then incubated at 30 °C for
3-4 h. -Galactosidase activity was determined as described
previously(42) . Values reported are the average of duplicate
assays of four independent transformants. -Galactosidase activity
is expressed as a nanomolar amount of substrate converted per minute
(Miller units).
Transformation of L. lactisL. lactis strains were transformed by electroporation as described by Holo
and Nes (43) with the following modifications. Cells were grown
in GM17 broth (0.5 M sucrose) supplemented with 2% glycine,
and selection was carried out on GM17 plates containing the respective
antibiotic. Sucrose was omitted from the selection plates.
Electroporation was performed with a Gene Pulser apparatus (Bio-Rad) by
using a single pulse of 12.5 kV/cm, a capacity of 25 microfarads, and a
resistance of 200 .
Nisin BioassayTest strain M. luteus ATCC
9341 was grown to an A of 0.8, and 0.3 ml was
added to 500 ml of molten GM17 agar, mixed, and poured into Petri
dishes (20 ml). L. lactis was spread on the agar surface, and
the diameter of the zone of M. luteus growth inhibition around
the L. lactis cells was determined.
Isolation of Membrane Vesicles of L.
lactisMembrane vesicle preparations of L. lactis were
based on a method described for Streptococcus
cremoris(44) . Cells from a 250-ml overnight culture were
harvested by centrifugation (4,000 g, 10 min, 4
°C), washed with 30 ml of 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8),
and suspended in 2 ml of 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8)
containing 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. The cell
suspension was diluted with 4 ml of 100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH
8) containing 10 mM MgSO and 30 mg of egg lysozyme
(E. Merck AG, Darmstadt, Germany). After incubation at 37 °C for 40
min, 3 M NaCl (final concentration, 0.5 M) was added
for cell lysis and the solution was diluted immediately with 14 ml of
100 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8) containing 50 µg of DNase I
and 50 µg of RNase A (Merck) per ml and incubation at 37 °C for
a further 20 min. After centrifugation (1,000 g, 60
min, 4 °C) the supernatant was aspirated carefully from the
sediment, which contained remaining whole cells and cell debris.
Sedimentation of membrane vesicles from the supernatant was achieved by
centrifugation at 48,000 g at 4 °C for 30 min.
Membrane vesicles were carefully resuspended with a Potter-Elvehjem
homogenizer in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8) containing 10
mM MgSO . Vesicles were washed twice with the same
centrifugation parameters, and finally aliquots of 0.1-0.5 ml of
suspended membrane vesicles were rapidly frozen and stored in liquid
nitrogen.
Co-immunoprecipitationMembrane vesicles were
solubilized with 1% dodecyl- -D-maltoside for 1 h at 4
°C. After 60 min of centrifugation at 100,000 g (4
°C) the supernatant was divided into two fractions, and 200 µl
of the supernatant was diluted with 200 µl of TENT buffer (25
mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 250 mM NaCl,
0.1% Triton X-100). After the addition of 50 µl of washed 10%
Pansorbin (Staphylococcus aureus cells; Calbiochem-Novabiochem
GmbH, Bad Soden, Germany) the samples were incubated at 22 °C for 1
h. After centrifugation (10,000 g, 1 min, 4 °C)
the supernatant was collected and incubated overnight at 4 °C with
5 µl of the respective antisera. To the suspension 100 µl of
prewashed 10% Pansorbin were added, and the sample was incubated for 15
min at 22 °C. After centrifugation of the StaphA (Pansorbin)
antibody-antigen complex (2 min, 10,000 g, 4 °C)
through a sucrose cushion (1 M sucrose in TENT buffer), the
supernatant was removed. The pellet was washed twice and loaded onto a
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by Western blot
analysis.
Antibody IsolationA 1.37-kilobase pair Sau3A/HindIII fragment of chromosomal DNA from L.
lactis 6F3 containing 999 base pairs of the nisC gene was
cloned into vector pATH3(45) . The hybrid gene trpE/nisC was expressed in E. coli RR1, and the hybrid protein was
isolated as described in (45) . The hybrid protein TrpE/NisC
was further purified by preparative SDS-gel electrophoresis and
isolated by electroelution. The purified fusion proteins were used for
rabbit immunization as described previously(26) .
SDS-polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Western Blot
AnalysisSDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot
analysis were performed as described
previously(26, 34) . Molecular weight standards for
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Deisenhofen, Germany).
RESULTS
Genetic Analysis of Genes nisB, nisT, and
nisCThe nisin-producing, plasmid-free strain L. lactis KS100 obtained from conjugation of L. lactis 6F3 with L. lactis MG1614 (34) was used to investigate the
physiological significance of the genes for biosynthesis of nisin. The
respective genes were interrupted by insertion of the erythromycin
resistance marker (Table 2). The flanking regions that allowed
homologous recombination on either side of the insertion were
approximately 1 kilobase pair each. In order to inactivate the nisB gene in the chromosome of L. lactis KS100 the cells were
transformed with plasmid pGEN5, which is not able to replicate in L. lactis cells. In the case of nisT pSI127 was used
for inactivation of the gene encoding the ABC transporter in the
chromosome of L. lactis KS100. Plasmid pSI40 was used for
transformation of L. lactis KS100 in order to inactivate the
chromosomally located nisC gene. The phenotypes of mutants
within the genes nisB, nisT, and nisC were
investigated by means of the nisin bioassay with M. luteus as
test organism. As shown in Fig. 1A all mutants were no
longer able to produce nisin. Western blot analysis with antibodies
directed against NisB and NisC revealed that the respective gene
products were no longer detectable in the mutants (Fig. 1, B and C).
Figure 1:
Inactivation of genes nisB, nisC, and nisT.A, bioassay for nisin
production. Strains were streaked onto plates containing M. luteus as a test organism. The zone of growth inhibition around the cells
of the wild-type strain L. lactis KS100 indicates nisin
production, whereas no growth inhibition can be observed around cells
of the nonproducing strain MG1614 and mutants of KS100 where the gene nisB, nisC, or nisT has been inactivated,
respectively. B, immunoblot analysis of NisB. Lane 1,
molecular mass standards (kDa); lanes 2, 3, and 4 (from left to right), protein extracts of L.
lactis wild-type cells (KS100), nonproducing cells (MG1614), and nisB disruption mutant. C, immunoblot analysis of
NisC. Lane 1, molecular mass standards (kDa); lanes
2, 3, and 4 (from left to right), protein extracts of L. lactis wild-type cells
(KS100), nonproducing cells (MG1614), and nisC disruption
mutant.
Membrane Localization of NisCIn order to detect
the NisC protein in cells of L. lactis, polyclonal antibodies
directed against NisC were used. The antibodies cross-reacted with a
protein with a molecular mass of approximately 47 kDa, which is in
accordance with the predicted molecular mass of NisC deduced from the
DNA sequence (Fig. 1C). After centrifugation of cell
extracts from nisin-producing L. lactis cells followed by
Western blot analysis, most of the cross-reacting activity was present
in the sediment, indicating that the NisC protein was associated with
the membrane fraction of the cell extracts. In order to test this
possibility, vesicles of L. lactis cells were prepared, and
proteins attached to the membrane vesicles were analyzed by immunoblot
analysis. The 47-kDa NisC protein was associated with the membrane
fraction. After resuspension followed by repeated centrifugation, the
NisC protein was still found in the vesicle fraction and only slight
depletion was observed, indicating that NisC is attached to the
membrane (Fig. 2). The same result has already been observed for
the NisB protein(26) . The finding that both proteins are
associated with the vesicle fraction strongly supports our hypothesis
that the biosynthesis of nisin occurs at the cellular membrane of L. lactis cells.
Figure 2:
Membrane localization of NisC. Protein
extracts were separated by SDS gel electrophoresis and detected by
Western blot analysis. Lane 1, molecular mass standards (kDa);
crude extracts of nisin producing cells L. lactis KS100 (lane 2) were centrifuged at 1,000 g for 60
min at 4 °C (lane 3, supernatant; lane 4,
sediment). The supernatant was further centrifuged at 48,000 g for 30 min at 4 °C (lane 5, sediment; lane
6, supernatant). The final vesicle fraction (sediment) was washed
twice with the same centrifugation parameters, and the NisC protein was
still associated with the membrane fractions (lanes 7 and 8, sediments after each centrifugation
step).
Construction of Fusion Proteins with the Yeast GAL4
Binding and Activation DomainsThe yeast two-hybrid system was
used to investigate proteins encoded by the nisin gene cluster for
their possible physical interactions. In frame fusions of the
respective genes with the parts of the GAL4 gene encoding the
DNA-binding and transcriptional activation domain of GAL4 (Fig. 3A) were constructed as described in Table 1. The results of -galactosidase assays monitoring the
interactions of proteins encoded by genes from the nisin gene cluster
fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding and activation domains, respectively, are
shown in Table 3and Table 4. In order to identify the
protein probably catalyzing the first modification reaction, we tested
for possible interactions with the NisA prenisin peptide. A blue
coloration of yeast cells, which is indicative of an interaction, was
observed for NisC and the NisA prepeptide. When we investigated whether
the NisB protein binds the prepeptide, we additionally observed a weak
interaction of the nisin prepeptide with N-terminal part of NisB. The
C-terminal half of NisB did not interact with NisA within the yeast
cells, suggesting that the prepeptide is attached to the N terminus of
NisB. Furthermore, we could observe interactions between the NisC
protein and both the N-terminal and C-terminal part of NisB. In
addition to this, the NisC protein also interacted with the C-terminal
domain of the NisT protein.
Figure 3:
A,
organization of the genes nisA, nisB, nisT, nisC, and corresponding protein fragments used in the
two-hybrid assays. The genes encoding proteins NisA, NisB, NisT, and
NisC are indicated by arrows, and the lengths of protein
fragments encoded by plasmids derived from pGBT9 and pGAD424 are shown below. B, composition of the suggested lanthionine
synthetase complex derived from the data obtained in the two-hybrid
assays. Lengths of bars correspond to the sizes of
interacting fragments indicated by the number of amino
acids.
In further experiments the NisA protein
was divided in the leader peptide and the propeptide region, and both
parts were fused to the respective GAL4 domains. These constructs were
also assayed for interaction with NisC, but no interaction of NisC with
either part of NisA could be observed, indicating that the complete
NisA protein is necessary for an interaction with NisC. The two-hybrid
analysis system also allowed us to test for self-interactions of
proteins involved in nisin maturation and transport by fusing the gene
of interest to the DNA binding and activation domain as well. When
yeast cells were cotransformed with plasmids carrying fusions of the nisC gene with the GAL4 activation domain and the
DNA-binding domain we observed -galactosidase activity, which
suggests that the protein complex that mediates the maturation of
prenisin contains more than one NisC protein. The same result (blue
coloration of the yeast cells) was also observed when plasmids carrying
fusions of the entire nisT gene with both parts of GAL4 were cotransformed. This finding suggests that at least two NisT
molecules are part of the supposed complex, which is in accordance with
the general view that bacterial ABC transporters occur as
dimers(46) . The results of the two-hybird investigations
suggested that all proteins involved in nisin maturation are associated
in a multimeric complex consisting of proteins NisB, NisC, and NisT (Fig. 3B).
Co-immunoprecipitation of NisB and NisCAlthough
the two-hybrid results were conclusive and indicated a physical
interaction of proteins NisB and NisC, further support by alternative
experiments was necessary to exclude possible artifacts. To prove that
NisB and NisC are attached to each other co-immunoprecipitation
experiments were carried out by using antibodies directed against NisB
and NisC, respectively. Membrane vesicles of L. lactis cells
were incubated with 1% dodecyl- -D-maltoside in order to
solubilize membrane-associated proteins. The resulting protein solution
was thereafter incubated with antibodies directed against the NisC
protein, and the protein-antibody complexes were precipitated with
protein A from S. aureus (see ``Materials and
Methods''). After SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, the
proteins precipitated by the NisC-specific antibody were further
analyzed by NisB-specific antibodies. As shown in Fig. 4A, our results clearly revealed that NisB was
co-precipitated by the NisC-specific antibody. The same result was
obtained when the proteins were first precipitated with the
NisB-specific antibody and further analyzed for the presence of NisC (Fig. 4B). A number of unspecific bands were also
observed due to protein A cross-reactions. To distinguish the
unspecific signals from specific ones we used strain L. lactis MG1614, which is identical to L. lactis KS100 except for
the fact that this strain lacks the genes for sucrose metabolism and
nisin production, for co-immunoprecipitations. By using strain MG1614,
all unspecific signals, but no signals corresponding to the size of
NisB or NisC, were observed. In preparations of L. lactis cells, which were not treated with protein A of S. aureus the unspecific signals were not present, which also confirms that
the unspecific signals are due to unspecific reactions of protein A.
The finding that proteins NisB and NisC can be co-immunprecipitated by
antisera specific for the other protein supports the results obtained
from the two-hybrid experiments and justifies the conclusion that the
two proteins NisB and NisC are subunits of a common protein complex.
Figure 4:
Co-immunoprecipitation experiments. A, co-immunoprecipitation of NisB and NisC analyzed with
NisB-specific antibodies. After precipitation, protein complexes were
separated on 7.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gels. The NisB cross-reacting band
is marked. Lane 1, molecular mass standards (kDa). Lane
2, NisB antibody-protein complex precipitated with protein A of S. aureus. Lane 3, NisC antibody-protein complex
precipitated with protein A of S. aureus. Lanes 2 and 3 show the result of the co-immunoprecipitation experiment
carried out with nisin-producing L. lactis KS100 cells. Lanes 4 and 5, control experiments with L. lactis MG1614 lacking the genes for nisin biosynthesis. Lane 6,
vesicle fraction of L. lactis KS100 as positive control.
Additional bands in lanes 2, 3, 4, and 5 are due to unspecific cross-reactions of the used antibodies with
protein A of S. aureus. B, co-immunoprecipitation of
NisB and NisC analyzed with NisC-specific antibodies. Lanes
1-6 are identical to lanes 1-6 in Fig. 4A. The NisC protein is marked. C,
co-immunoprecipitation of NisC and NisA analyzed with NisC-specific
antibodies. Lane 1, molecular mass standards (kDa). Lane
2, NisC antibody-protein complex precipitated with protein A of S. aureus. Lane 3, NisA antibody-protein complex
precipitated with protein A of S. aureus. Lanes 2 and 3 show the result of the co-immunoprecipitation experiment
carried out with L. lactis KS100 cells. Lanes 4 and 5 show control experiments with vesicles of L. lactis MG1614 with NisC-specific antibodies (lane 4) and
NisA-specific antibodies (lane 5). Lane 6, vesicle
fraction of L. lactis KS100 as positive control. Additional
bands in lanes 2, 3, 4, and 5 are
due to unspecific cross-reactions of the used antibodies with protein A
of S. aureus. NisC protein is marked by an asterisk. D, co-immunoprecipitation of NisB and NisA analyzed with
NisA-specific antibodies. After precipitation protein complexes were
separated on 15% Tricine-polyacrylamide gels. Lane 1,
molecular mass standards (kDa). Lane 2, NisB antibody-protein
complex precipitated with protein A of S. aureus. Lane
3, NisA antibody-protein complex precipitated with protein A of S. aureus. Lanes 4 and 5 show control
experiments with vesicles of L. lactis MG1614 with
NisC-specific antibodies (lane 4) and NisA-specific antibodies (lane 5). Additional bands in lanes 2, 3, 4, and 5 are due to unspecific cross-reactions of the
used antibodies with protein A of S.
aureus.
Co-immunoprecipitation of NisA and NisCWe also
investigated the possible interaction of the nisin prepeptide NisA with
the NisC protein, by co-immunoprecipitation with antibodies directed
against the NisC protein and against the nisin prepeptide(34) .
Cell extracts of nisin-producing L. lactis cells were
incubated with antibodies directed against the prepeptide, and the
protein-antibody complexes were precipitated with protein A of S.
aureus (see ``Materials and Methods''). After
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis the proteins precipitated by the
NisA antibody were further analyzed by antibodies directed against
NisC. Again vesicles of the strain MG1614, which does not contain the
nisin gene cluster, were used to prove the specificity of the signals.
As shown in Fig. 4C our experiment clearly revealed
that NisC was co-precipitated by prepeptide-specific antibodies, which
confirms biochemically the finding of the two-hybrid assay that the
nisin prepeptide is bound to the NisC protein.
Co-immunoprecipitation of NisA and NisBWhen cell
extracts of L. lactis KS100 were treated with antibodies
directed against the prepeptide and the immunprecipitate was
subsequently analyzed with NisB-specific antibodies, we were not able
to detect the NisB protein. On the other hand, when cell extracts were
first incubated with NisB-specific antibodies and the samples were
subsequently analyzed for the presence of the prepeptide after
precipitation, a weak signal was detectable (Fig. 4D),
indicating an interaction of both proteins. The fact that a
co-immunoprecipitation only occurred by using NisB-specific antibodies,
but not when NisA antibodies were used for precipitation, possibly
indicates that the NisB protein covers the leader sequence of the
prepeptide and makes it inaccessible to the NisA antibodies.
DISCUSSION
Since the isolation of lantibiotic structural genes, which
proved that lantibiotics are encoded by distinct genes, several genes
involved in lantibiotic biosynthesis have been identified flanking the
structural genes. The genes found near the structural genes of
different producers show strong similarities indicating their similar
function in lantibiotic maturation, secretion, processing, immunity,
and the regulation of biosynthesis. The lantibiotics are considered to
be formed by posttranslational modifications that convert the
ribosomally synthesized prepeptides into peptides that contain the
characteristic ring structure of lantibiotics. Two reactions have been
proposed for the maturation of lantibiotics, dehydration of serine and
threonine residues in the propeptide region and the addition of sulfur
from neighboring cysteine residues to the resulting double bounds. Our experiments revealed that the genes nisB and nisC encode two proteins of 117.5 and 47 kDa that are both associated
with the cellular membrane. Inactivation of the genes by insertion of
antibiotic resistance markers completely abolished nisin production in
both cases, demonstrating their involvement in the biosynthesis of
nisin. Furthermore, the results of the two-hybrid assay and
co-immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that these proteins are
attached to each other. In addition to this we could also demonstrate
that the NisB protein as well as NisC interact with NisA. Therefore, we
assume that proteins NisB and NisC form a complex that mediates the
maturation of the nisin prepeptide. Since the proteins encoded by genes nisB and nisC share no homologies with other known
proteins in the data bases except products of similar genes found in
the gene clusters of different lantibiotic producers, we suppose that
they might catalyze reactions that are specific for lantibiotic
maturation. The NisA antibody we used in the co-immunoprecipitation
experiments is directed against the leader sequence of the prepeptide.
Co-immunoprecipitation of NisB was impossible with the prepeptide
antibody, which is directed against the leader sequence of NisA.
However, when the cell extracts were first incubated with antibodies
directed against NisB, the prepeptide could be co-immunoprecipitated.
Co-immunoprecipitation in only one direction indicated that the
nisin-prepeptide is not accessible to its leader-directed antibody in
the NisB-NisA complex, suggesting that the leader peptide region of the
prepeptide is involved in NisB binding. The finding that the complex
consisting of NisA and NisC could be precipitated by the antibody
directed against the NisA leader sequence indicates that in the complex
the leader peptide is still accessible and not completely covered by
NisC and only temporary covered by NisB. Possibly, the leader peptide
is necessary for the recognition of NisA by the NisB protein, and the
binding of the NisC protein takes place in the propeptide region. Another interesting result of our experiments is that the protein
complex mediating maturation of nisin is attached to the ABC
transporter NisT, which has been implicated in the translocation
process of the modified precursor peptide. Inactivation of nisT by insertion of the erythromycin resistance marker abolished nisin
production, indicating that the gene product of nisT is
essential for nisin biosynthesis. Results obtained from the two-hybrid
assay revealed an interaction between NisC and the C terminus of NisT.
Furthermore, we observed in the two-hybrid assay that NisT interacts
with NisT, indicating that the ABC transporter consists of at least two nisT gene products. Since this interaction could only be
observed when the entire nisT gene was fused with the
respective GAL4 gene fragments, the N terminus of NisT seems
to be important for the dimerization. The same result was observed with
NisC, which means that at least two molecules of NisC are part of the
protein complex. Taking together our recent results we suggest the
following maturation pathway of the nisin prepeptide. The translation
product of the nisin structural gene, the nisin prepeptide, is matured
at a protein complex consisting of proteins NisB and NisC, which is
membrane-associated. Since the modification complex is directly
attached to the ABC transporter consisting of NisT proteins, we assume
that the fully modified peptide is subsequently translocated over the
cytoplasmic membrane. Following translocation the leader peptide is
removed by the specific extracellular protease NisP, which is bound to
the cell surface(28) , and active nisin is released. Recently it has been demonstrated for Pep5 that incompletely
modified Pep5 precursor molecules could be isolated when the pepC gene was truncated, leaving only 167 amino acids of the PepC
protein behind(25) . It was proposed that dehydratization is
carried out by PepB and that PepC binds to the dehydrated prepeptides
and catalyzes thioether formation. Our results of the two-hybrid assay
demonstrated that the NisC protein binds the nisin prepeptide within
the yeast cells. This strongly suggests that NisC is able to bind the
unmodified prepeptide. Since mutants in the nisB gene as well
as spaB mutants of B. subtilis do not produce nisin
or subtilin(18) , we think that in addition to the LanC
proteins, LanB is also an essential component of the lanthionine
synthetase complex. It has been reported that the gene clusters for
cytolysin and lacticin 481 production contain genes that encode
proteins CylM and LctM(47, 48) , whose C-terminal
domains exhibit strong similarities with LanC proteins, whereas no
similarity with LanB proteins was observed(12) . Interestingly
the lack of LanB-homologous proteins is correlated with differences in
the leader peptides. The structural genes for these lantibiotics encode
prepeptides whose leader peptides differ from whose encoded by the
nisin, epidermin, subtilin, and Pep5 gene clusters(12) . The
fact that organisms that produce lantibiotics with class two leader
sequences like lacticin 481 and cytolysin contain only proteins with
similarities to LanC (12) is in accordance with our results
suggesting that LanB may mainly interact with the lantibiotic leader
and that the catalytic subunit of the lanthionine synthetase complex
for modification of the prepeptides is located within the LanC
proteins. LanB proteins might be necessary for the recognition of the
prepeptides, stabilization of the complex, and maintenance of a
conformation of the prepeptides that allows the modification reactions
to proceed. In cytolysin- or lacticin 481-producing cells, the function
of the LanB proteins might be provided by the N-terminal domain of the
CylM and LctM proteins, respectively. We propose the existence of a
lanthionine synthetase complex of at least 350 kDa consisting of NisB,
at least two molecules of NisC, and a NisT dimer (Fig. 5). Due
to unsuccessful attempts to isolate the complex by the native blue gel
method (50) we propose that NisC is only loosely attached to
the NisT transporter molecules. However, the genetic and biochemical
data gave convincing evidence that lantibiotic prepeptides are matured
at a multimeric lanthionine synthetase complex that catalyzes the
dehydration of amino acid residues and the subsequent thioether
formation between the dehydrated residues and neighboring cysteine
residues within the lantibiotic prepeptides.
Figure 5:
Model of the suggested lanthionine
synthetase complex. The NisT ABC transporter is integrated as a dimer
in the cellular membrane and linked to NisB via a NisC
dimer.
FOOTNOTES
- *
- This
work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). The
costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked
``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
- §
- Recipient of a grant from the
DFG-Graduiertenkolleg (``Proteinstrukturen, Dynamik und
Funktion'').
- ¶
- To whom correspondence
should be addressed. Tel.: 69-7982-9525; Fax: 69-7982-9527; entian{at}em.uni-frankfurt.d400.de.
- (
) - The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase
chain reaction; bp, base pair; Tricine, N-[2-hydroxy-1,1-bis(hydroxymethyl)ethyl]glycine.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Z. Gutowski-Eckel, G. Engelke, S. Borchert,
U. Eikmanns, and P. Kiesau for stimulating discussions.
REFERENCES
- Buchmann, G. W.,
Banerjee, S., and Hansen, J. N. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 16260-16266
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kaletta, C., and Entian,
K.-D. (1989) J. Bacteriol. 171, 1597-1601
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Chevallier, R. J.,
Fournaud, J., Levebre, E., and Mocquot, G. (1957) Ann.
Technol. Agric. 2, 117-137
- Hurst, A. (1981) Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 27, 263-265
- Benz, R., Jung, G., and Sahl, H.-G. (1991) Nisin and
Novel Lantibiotics , ESCOM Scientific Publishers, Leiden, Germany
- Sahl, H.-G. (1985) J. Bacteriol. 162, 833-836
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schüller,
F., Benz, R., and Sahl, H. G. (1989) Eur. J. Biochem. 182, 181-186
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ingram, L. (1969) Biophys. Acta 184, 216-219
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schnell, N., Entian,
K.-D., Schneider, U., Götz, F.,
Zähner, H., Kellner, R., and Jung, G. (1988) Nature 333, 276-278
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Weil, H.-P.,
Beck-Sickinger, A. G., Metzger, J., Stevanovic, S., Jung, G., Josten,
M., and Sahl, H.-G. (1990) Eur. J. Biochem. 194, 217-223
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dodd, H. M., Horn, N.,
and Gasson, M. J. (1990) J. Gen. Microbiol. 136, 555-566
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- de Vos, W. M., Kuipers,
O. P., van der Meer, J. R., and Siezen, R. (1995) Mol.
Microbiol. 17(3), 427-437
[CrossRef]
- Sahl, H.-G., Jack, R.
W., and Bierbaum, G. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 230, 827-853
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Banerjee, S., and
Hansen, J. N. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 9508-9514
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kaletta, C., Klein, C.,
Schnell, N., and Entian, K.-D. (1991) Nisin and Novel
Lantibiotics , ESCOM Scientific Publishers, Leiden, Germany
- Klein, C., and Entian,
K.-D. (1994) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 2793-2801
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Klein, C., Kaletta, C.,
and Entian, K.-D. (1993) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59, 296-303
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Klein, C., Kaletta, C.,
Schnell, N., and Entian, K.-D. (1992) Appl. Environ.
Microbiol. 58, 132-142
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Allgaier, H., Jung, G.,
Werner, R. G., Schneider, U., and Zähner, H. (1986) Eur. J. Biochem. 160, 9-22
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Augustin, J.,
Rosenstein, R., Wieland, B., Schneider, U., Schnell, N., Engelke, G.,
Entian, K.-D., and Götz, F. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 204, 1149-1154
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schnell, N., Engelke,
G., Augustin, J., Rosenstein, R., Ungermann, V.,
Götz, F., and Entian, K.-D. (1992) Eur. J. Biochem. 204, 57-68
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Schnell, N., Engelke, G., Augustin, J., Rosenstein, R.,
G ö tz, F., and Entian, K.-D. (1991) Nisin and
Novel Lantibiotics, ESCOM Scientific Publishers, Leiden, Germany
- Schnell, N., Entian
K.-D., Götz, F., Hörner, T.,
Kellner, R., and Jung, G. (1989) FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 58, 263-268
[CrossRef]
- Kaletta, C., Entian,
K.-D., Kellner, R., Jung, G., Reis, M., and Sahl, H. G. (1989) Arch. Microbiol. 152, 16-19
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Meyer, C., Bierbaum, G.,
Heidrich, C., Reis, M., Süling, J., Iglesias-Wind,
M. I., Kempter, C., Molitor E., and Sahl H.-G. (1995) Eur. J. Biochem. 232, 478-489
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Engelke, G.,
Gutowski-Eckel, Z., Hammelmann, M., and Entian, K.-D. (1992) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58, 3730-3743
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kuipers, O. P.,
Beerthuyzen, M. M., Siezen, R. J., and de Vos, W. M. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 216, 281-291
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- van der Meer, J. R.,
Polman, J., Beerthuyzen, M. M., Siezen, R. J., Kuipers, O. P., and de
Vos, W. M. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 2578-2588
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Siegers, K., and Entian,
K.-D. (1995) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1082-1089
[Abstract]
- Chien, C. T., Bartel, P.
L., Sternglanz, R., and Fields, S. (1991) Proc. Natl.
Sci. U. S. A. 88, 9578-9582
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Fields, S., and Song, O. (1989) Nature 340, 245-246
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Blight, M. A., and
Holland, I. B. (1990) Mol. Microbiol. 4, 873-880
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gasson, M. J. (1983) J. Bacteriol. 154, 1-9
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Engelke, G.,
Gutowski-Eckel, Z., Kiesau, P., Siegers, K., Hammelmann, M., and
Entian, K.-D. (1994) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 816-825
- Niederacher, D., and
Entian, K.-D. (1987) Mol. Gen. Genet. 206, 505-509
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Yanisch-Perron, C.,
Vieira, J., and Messing, J. (1985) Gene (Amst.) 33, 103-119
- Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed., Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
- Tautz, D., and Renz, N. (1983) Anal. Biochem. 132, 503-517
- Birnboim, H. C., and
Doly, J. (1979) Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 1513-1518
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Southern, E. M. (1975) J. Mol. Biol. 98, 503-517
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Klebe, R. J., Harriss,
J. V., Sharp, D., and Douglas, M. G. (1983) Gene (Amst.) 25, 333-341
- Guarente, L. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 101, 181-191
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Holo, H., and Nes, I. F. (1989) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55, 3119-3123
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Otto, R., Lageveen, R.
G., Veldkamp, H., and Konings W. N. (1982) J.
Bacteriol. 149, 733-738
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Koerner, T. J., Hill, J.
E., Myers, A. M., and Tzagoloff, A. (1991) Methods
Enzymol. 194, 477-490
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Higgins, C. F. (1995) Cell 82, 693-696
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Gilmore, M. S., Segarra,
R. A., Booth, M. C., Bogie, C. P., Hall, L. R., and Clewell, D. B. (1994) J. Bacteriol. 176, 7335-7344
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Rince, A., Dufour A., Le
Pogam, S., Thuault, D., Bourgeois, C. M., and Le Pennec, J. P. (1994) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 1652-1657
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Horinouchi, S., and
Weisblum, W. (1980) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 77, 7079-7083
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schägger,
H., Cramer, W. A., and von Jagow, G. (1994) Anal.
Biochem. 217, 220-230
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Entian, K.-D., and de
Vos, W. M. (1996) Antonie Leeuwenhoek 69, 109-117
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-Y. F. Dubois, T. R. H. M. Kouwen, A. K. C. Schurich, C. R. Reis, H. T. Ensing, E. N. Trip, J. C. Zweers, and J. M. van Dijl
Immunity to the Bacteriocin Sublancin 168 Is Determined by the SunI (YolF) Protein of Bacillus subtilis
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,
February 1, 2009;
53(2):
651 - 661.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kuipers, J. Meijer-Wierenga, R. Rink, L. D. Kluskens, and G. N. Moll
Mechanistic Dissection of the Enzyme Complexes Involved in Biosynthesis of Lacticin 3147 and Nisin
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
November 1, 2008;
74(21):
6591 - 6597.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. B. van den Berg van Saparoea, P. J. Bakkes, G. N. Moll, and A. J. M. Driessen
Distinct Contributions of the Nisin Biosynthesis Enzymes NisB and NisC and Transporter NisT to Prenisin Production by Lactococcus lactis
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
September 1, 2008;
74(17):
5541 - 5548.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Lubelski, W. Overkamp, L. D. Kluskens, G. N. Moll, and O. P. Kuipers
Influence of Shifting Positions of Ser, Thr, and Cys Residues in Prenisin on the Efficiency of Modification Reactions and on the Antimicrobial Activities of the Modified Prepeptides
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
August 1, 2008;
74(15):
4680 - 4685.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kuipers, J. Wierenga, R. Rink, L. D. Kluskens, A. J. M. Driessen, O. P. Kuipers, and G. N. Moll
Sec-Mediated Transport of Posttranslationally Dehydrated Peptides in Lactococcus lactis
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
December 1, 2006;
72(12):
7626 - 7633.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Li, J. P. J. Yu, J. S. Brunzelle, G. N. Moll, W. A. van der Donk, and S. K. Nair
Structure and mechanism of the lantibiotic cyclase involved in nisin biosynthesis.
Science,
March 10, 2006;
311(5766):
1464 - 1467.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Kuipers, E. de Boef, R. Rink, S. Fekken, L. D. Kluskens, A. J. M. Driessen, K. Leenhouts, O. P. Kuipers, and G. N. Moll
NisT, the Transporter of the Lantibiotic Nisin, Can Transport Fully Modified, Dehydrated, and Unmodified Prenisin and Fusions of the Leader Peptide with Non-lantibiotic Peptides
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 21, 2004;
279(21):
22176 - 22182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Stein, S. Heinzmann, I. Solovieva, and K.-D. Entian
Function of Lactococcus lactis Nisin Immunity Genes nisI and nisFEG after Coordinated Expression in the Surrogate Host Bacillus subtilis
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 3, 2003;
278(1):
89 - 94.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Koponen, M. Tolonen, M. Qiao, G. Wahlstrom, J. Helin, and P. E. J. Saris
NisB is required for the dehydration and NisC for the lanthionine formation in the post-translational modification of nisin
Microbiology,
November 1, 2002;
148(11):
3561 - 3568.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Li and D. J. O'Sullivan
Heterologous Expression of the Lactococcus lactis Bacteriocin, Nisin, in a Dairy Enterococcus Strain
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
July 1, 2002;
68(7):
3392 - 3400.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Stein, S. Borchert, B. Conrad, J. Feesche, B. Hofemeister, J. Hofemeister, and K.-D. Entian
Two Different Lantibiotic-Like Peptides Originate from the Ericin Gene Cluster of Bacillus subtilis A1/3
J. Bacteriol.,
March 15, 2002;
184(6):
1703 - 1711.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Uguen, J.-P. Le Pennec, and A. Dufour
Lantibiotic Biosynthesis: Interactions between Prelacticin 481 and Its Putative Modification Enzyme, LctM
J. Bacteriol.,
September 15, 2000;
182(18):
5262 - 5266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. McAuliffe, C. Hill, and R. P. Ross
Each peptide of the two-component lantibiotic lacticin 3147 requires a separate modification enzyme for activity
Microbiology,
September 1, 2000;
146(9):
2147 - 2154.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Qi, P. Chen, and P. W. Caufield
Purification of Mutacin III from Group III Streptococcus mutans UA787 and Genetic Analyses of Mutacin III Biosynthesis Genes
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
September 1, 1999;
65(9):
3880 - 3887.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. W. Miller, R. Schamber, Y. Chen, and B. Ray
Production of Active Chimeric Pediocin AcH in Escherichia coli in the Absence of Processing and Secretion Genes from the Pediococcus pap Operon
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
January 1, 1998;
64(1):
14 - 20.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-M. Li, J. C. Milne, L. L. Madison, R. Kolter, and C. T. Walsh
From Peptide Precursors to Oxazole and Thiazole-Containing Peptide Antibiotics: Microcin B17 Synthase
Science,
November 15, 1996;
274(5290):
1188 - 1193.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|