JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Conneely, O. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Conneely, O. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 22, Issue of May 31, 1996 pp. 12790-12794
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Cooperative Interactions between the Amino- and Carboxyl-terminal Lobes Contribute to the Unique Iron-binding Stability of Lactoferrin*

(Received for publication, February 1, 1996, and in revised form, March 19, 1996)

Pauline P. Ward , X. Zhou and O. M. Conneely Dagger

From the Department of Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Lactoferrin is a member of the transferrin family of iron-binding proteins. Several functions have been ascribed to lactoferrin, including regulation of iron homeostasis, antibacterial properties, and regulation of myelopoiesis. However, the structural features of lactoferrin that are required for most of these functions are unknown.

Previously, we reported the development of an efficient fungal expression system to produce recombinant human lactoferrin. The availability of this production system demonstrated the feasibility of producing mutant lactoferrins to address the structure/function relationship of the protein. In the present study, we used a site-directed mutagenesis approach to address the contribution of the bilobal structure of lactoferrin to its unique iron-binding stability. Like transferrin, lactoferrin consists of two repeated iron-binding lobes that bind one iron atom each. However, unlike transferrin, lactoferrin retains iron over a broad pH range, a key property that contributes to the unique iron-binding functions of the protein. Using mutants that selectively ablate the iron-binding function in either lobe, we demonstrate differential iron-binding stability of the amino- and carboxyl-terminal iron-binding lobes of lactoferrin. Further, we show that the unique iron-binding stability of the protein is imparted primarily by the carboxyl-terminal domain which functions cooperatively to stabilize iron-binding to the amino-terminal domain of lactoferrin.


INTRODUCTION

Lactoferrin is a member of the transferrin family of non-heme iron-binding glycoproteins (1) which includes transferrin, the major iron-transport protein in blood (2), ovotransferrin, an avian egg white protein (3), and melanotransferrin, a membrane bound form of this family found in human melanocytes (4). Lactoferrin has a broad distribution, present in both external secretions that bathe the body surfaces (5, 6, 7, 8, 9) and also in the secondary granules of polymorphonuclear neutrophils where it can be released into the bloodstream upon neutrophil activation (10). The functions proposed for this protein include iron binding and delivery to the small intestine (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17), antimicrobial activity against a wide range of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria (18, 19, 20, 21, 22), cellular growth promotion (23, 24), regulation of myelopoiesis (25, 26, 27), and immunomodulatory properties (28, 29, 30).

Lactoferrin shares a high degree of structural homology with other members of the transferrin family. All of these proteins are monomeric glycoproteins with a molecular mass of ~80 kDa (1, 31). The three-dimensional structure of lactoferrin (32) and transferrin (33) have been precisely defined by x-ray crystallographic analysis. The proteins are folded into two globular lobes corresponding to the amino- and carboxyl-terminal halves of the protein. This bilobal structure, with ~40% conservation between the NH2- and COOH-terminal halves, is thought to have evolved by intragenic duplication from a common ancestral gene (34). Each of these lobes can reversibly bind iron with high affinity and with the concomitant binding of an anion, usually carbonate (1). The amino acids required for iron-binding by lactoferrin are highly conserved between members of the transferrin family (35). Specifically, the iron atom in each lobe of lactoferrin is coordinated to Asp-61, Tyr-93, Tyr-193, and His-254 in the NH2-terminal lobe and the corresponding Asp-396, Tyr-436, Tyr-529, and His-598 in the COOH-terminal lobe (32). However, despite their structural similarities, lactoferrin displays much more avid iron-binding properties than its serum counterpart, transferrin. In particular, the release of iron from lactoferrin displays greater pH stability than does transferrin, the latter releasing iron over a pH of 6-4, while the former releases iron over a pH of 4-2 (36). It is likely that the unique iron-binding properties of lactoferrin contribute to some of the diverse functional activities proposed for this protein.

We have previously reported the high level production and characterization of recombinant human lactoferrin in the filamentous fungus, Aspergillus awamori (17). The recombinant protein was shown to be indistinguishable from human breast milk lactoferrin by several criteria including iron and receptor binding and antimicrobial activity. Hence, the availability of this expression system has now enabled the production of lactoferrin mutants in sufficient quantities to address the structure/function role of this protein.

In the present study, the contribution of the two-lobe structure of lactoferrin to the unique iron-binding properties of this protein were addressed. Site-directed mutagenesis of the human lactoferrin cDNA was used to selectively mutate the two tyrosine residues involved in iron binding in either or both halves of the protein. The resulting three iron binding-defective mutants were expressed and purified from A. awamori (17). Iron-binding analysis using 59FeCl3 confirmed that mutation of the two tyrosine residues, involved in iron binding in either lobe, resulted in selective loss of iron binding to the mutated lobe. In addition, pH-dependent iron release studies demonstrated a differential iron-binding stability of the two halves of lactoferrin, the NH2-terminal lobe being much more acid-labile than the COOH-terminal lobe. More importantly, we show that a functional iron-binding COOH-terminal lobe is necessary for the pH stability of iron binding to the NH2-terminal lobe which is characteristic of wild-type lactoferrin. These results support the conclusion that cooperative interactions between the two lobes of lactoferrin contribute to the unique iron-binding properties of this protein.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Construction of pPLF-26, a Universal A. awamori Expression Vector

The construction of an expression vector, pPLF-19, for production of lactoferrin in A. awamori has previously been described (17). In order to construct an expression vector containing unique sites for cloning lactoferrin mutant cDNAs, pPLF-26 was generated. pPLF-18 (17) was digested with SphI generating two fragments of 3.3 and 4.4 kb.1 The 3.3-kb SphI fragment containing the lactoferrin cDNA was subcloned into SphI-digested pALTER (Promega, Madison, WI) generating pLF18Sp.Alt. The 4.4-kb SphI fragment was religated generating PR18.2. In vitro mutagenesis using the commercially available pALTER kit (Promega) was used to introduce a NotI restriction enzyme site at the start of mature lactoferrin cDNA in pLF18Sp.Alt generating pNot.9. The 5'-phosphorylated oligonucleotide used for the mutagenesis was as follows: 5'-AGCGCGGCCGCAGGAGAAGGA-3'. PR18.2 was digested with EcoRI, and the resulting two fragments were repaired using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase 1 and religated in the correct orientation. The resulting plasmid, pDelta E12, was digested with SphI and ligated with a 3.3-kb SphI fragment from pNot.9 generating pPLF-25. PLO3, encoding the phleomycin resistance gene under the control of the beta -tubulin promoter (37) was digested with EcoRI, and the resulting fragments were repaired using the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase 1 and religated in the correct orientation. The resulting vector, PLO3Delta R1, was digested with HindIII, and the resulting 2.3-kb fragment was subcloned into HindIII-digested pPLF-25 in the same orientation as the lactoferrin cDNA generating pPLF-26.

Construction of Iron Binding-defective Mutants of Lactoferrin, MN-2Y, MC-2Y, and MNC-4Y

Synthetic 5'-phosphorylated oligonucleotides with EcoRI/BamHI ends, were generated in order to introduce a NotI site into pALTER. The sequence of the oligonucleotides were as follows: top strand, 5'-GATCCATGCGGCCGCATG-3'; bottom strand, 5'-AATTCATGCGGCCGCATG-3'. The oligos were annealed and ligated into EcoRI/BamHI-digested pALTER generating pALTLink. pPLF-26 was digested with NotI/EcoRI, and the resulting 2.1-kb fragment containing the human lactoferrin cDNA was subcloned into NotI/EcoRI-digested pALTLink. The resulting plasmid, pALThLF, was used for subsequent mutagenesis experiments. The tyrosine residues involved in iron binding by lactoferrin in the NH2-terminal lobe (Tyr-93 and Tyr-193), COOH-terminal lobe (Tyr-436 and Tyr-529), and NH2- and COOH-terminal lobes (Tyr-93, Tyr-193, Tyr-436, and Tyr-529) were converted to corresponding alanine residues using in vitro mutagenesis using the pALTER kit. The 5'-phosphorylated oligonucleotides used for the mutagenesis were as follows: Tyr-93 right-arrow Ala-93, 5'-CACAGCCACGGCATAAGCGTGAGTTCGTGGCTG-3'; Tyr-193 right-arrow Ala-193, 5'-CTTGAAGGCACCAGAGGCGCTGAAGTACGGTTC-3'; Tyr-436 right-arrow Ala-436, 5'-CACCGCCACAGCAAGGGCTCCTTCCACAGGTCT 3'; Tyr-529 right-arrow Ala-529, 5'-CCGGAAAGCCCCAGTGGCGCCGTAGTATCTCTC 3'. The resulting plasmids, pALTMN-2Y, pALTMC-2Y, and pALTMNC-4Y, were digested with NotI/EcoRI and subcloned into NotI/EcoRI-digested pPLF-26 generating p26MN-2Y, p26MC-2Y, and p26MNC-4Y, respectively. All oligonucleotide sequences and construction junctions were sequenced using the commercially available Sequenase Version 2.0 kit (U. S. Biochemical Corp., Cleveland OH).

Expression and Purification of MN-2Y, MC-2Y, and MNC-4Y

The A. awamori expression plasmids p26MN-2Y, p26MC-2Y, and p26MNC-4Y were transformed into A. awamori, and transformants obtained were cultured for 7 days as described previously (17). The culture medium was screened for the iron-binding mutants using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (38). Positive cultures (>50 mg/liter) were cultured in 2-liter flasks for 7 days, and the lactoferrin mutant was purified using ion-exchange chromatography with CM-Sephadex (17). The proteins were dialyzed against 0.1 M citric acid followed by extensive dialysis against H2O and 5 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.5 (39).

Receptor-binding Assays

Receptor binding assays were performed with a biotin/avidin microtiter plate assay (40) using 8-day-old Caco-2 solubilized membranes (300 ng) essentially as described elsewhere (17).

Iron Saturation and pH Stability of Iron Binding to the Lactoferrin Mutants

MN-2Y, MC-2Y, and MNC-4Y (5 mg) were incubated with a 4-fold excess of FeCl3:59FeCl3:nitriloacetic acid (400:1:8) (17). The samples were incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The samples were purified through a NAP-10 column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) followed by dialysis against 0.05 M Tris-Cl, 0.2 M NaCl, pH 7.0, for 12 h to remove any nonspecific iron bound to the lactoferrin mutant proteins. Iron bound to the lactoferrin mutants after dialysis was quantified by liquid scintillation counting. The pH stability of iron binding for each of the lactoferrin mutants was carried out as described previously (17).


RESULTS

Expression and Purification of Iron Binding-defective Mutants in the NH2-terminal, COOH-terminal, or NH2- and COOH-terminal Domains of Lactoferrin

In order to examine the contribution of the two-domain structure to the unique iron-binding properties of lactoferrin, we used a site-directed mutagenesis approach to generate mutants in the human lactoferrin cDNA which encoded proteins which were defective in iron binding in either or both lobes of the protein. Specifically, Tyr-93 and Tyr-193 were mutated to Ala-93 and Ala-193, generating a mutant unable to bind iron in the amino-terminal half of lactoferrin (MN-2Y). The corresponding tyrosine residues in the carboxyl-terminal half of lactoferrin (Tyr-436 and Tyr-529) were converted to alanine residues, resulting in inactivation of the iron-binding function of the COOH-terminal domain (MC-2Y). All four tyrosine residues involved in iron binding by lactoferrin (Tyr-93, Tyr-193, Tyr-436, and Tyr-529) were also mutated to corresponding alanine residues generating a mutant which was unable to bind iron in both lobes of lactoferrin (MNC-4Y). The mutants were expressed and purified from A. awamori as described previously for recombinant human lactoferrin (17). The purified proteins were subjected to polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by either Western immunoblot analysis or silver stain analysis (Fig. 1). Western immunoblot analysis using a specific polyclonal IgG directed against human lactoferrin detected an immunoreactive band corresponding to the size of wild-type recombinant lactoferrin for each of the three mutants (Fig. 1A, lanes 1-4). Analysis of a duplicate gel by silver stain analysis showed that the mutants were >95% pure, and a single band at the expected molecular mass of ~80 kDa was observed for each of the proteins (Fig. 1B, lanes 1-4). Hence, the size and immunoreactivity of the lactoferrin mutants were indistinguishable from wild-type recombinant lactoferrin.


Fig. 1. Western immunoblot and silver stain analysis of the purified lactoferrin iron binding-defective mutants. A, Western immunoblot analysis of 200-ng samples of purified recombinant human lactoferrin (RechLF), NH2-terminal (MN-2Y), COOH-terminal (MC-2Y), and NH2- and COOH-terminal (MNC-4Y) iron binding-defective mutants of lactoferrin, respectively. B, silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel analysis of purified RechLF, MN-2Y, MC-2Y, and MNC-4Y (1 µg each).

The Iron Binding-defective Mutants of Lactoferrin Have Similar Enteric Receptor Binding Properties to Wild-type Recombinant Human Lactoferrin

We predicted that single amino acid substitutions of tyrosine to alanine residues in the lactoferrin iron-binding mutants would result in minimal structural alteration to the protein. Thus, the activity of the iron binding-defective mutants which are independent of iron binding, should be similar to that of wild-type recombinant human lactoferrin. We and others have previously shown the presence of specific and saturable receptors for iron-saturated lactoferrin on human enterocyte cells (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17). Hence, as a prerequisite to using this assay for our iron-binding mutants, we needed to establish the relative receptor binding kinetics of iron-free versus iron-saturated recombinant lactoferrin. To this end, competitive receptor binding assays were performed as described previously (17). Biotinylated iron-saturated recombinant human lactoferrin (0.4 µM) was incubated with human enteric Caco-2 cell membranes in the presence of 0-20-fold molar excess of unlabeled apo- or iron-saturated recombinant human lactoferrin and a biotin/avidin microtiter assay was performed (17). The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 2A. Surprisingly, both apo- and iron-saturated lactoferrin showed comparable capacity to displace binding of iron-saturated biotinylated lactoferrin to the human enteric Caco-2 cell membranes, indicating that both forms of lactoferrin have similar affinity for the lactoferrin enterocyte receptor. While lactoferrin has been proposed to deliver iron to enterocyte cells through these receptors, the similar relative receptor binding affinities of iron-free and iron-saturated lactoferrin suggest that the ability of lactoferrin to deliver iron via these receptors depends primarily on the relative amounts of iron-saturated versus iron-free lactoferrin present in the intestinal lumen.


Fig. 2. Competition of biotinylated recombinant lactoferrin binding to human enterocyte cells by the lactoferrin iron binding-defective mutants. A, iron-saturated biotinylated recombinant human lactoferrin (0.4 µM) was incubated with Caco-2 membranes (300 ng) in the presence or absence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled iron-saturated recombinant lactoferrin (Fe-RechLF) or apo-recombinant lactoferrin (Apo-RechLF). Inhibition of biotinylated lactoferrin binding to Caco-2 membranes was determined using a biotin/avidin microtiter assay (17). B-D, apo-biotinylated recombinant human lactoferrin (0.4 µM) was incubated with Caco-2 membranes (300 ng) in the presence or absence of increasing concentrations of unlabeled apo-RechLF or MN-2Y (B), MC-2Y (C), or MNC-4Y (D). Inhibition of biotinylated lactoferrin binding to Caco-2 membranes was determined using a biotin/avidin microtiter assay. The data are represented as means ± S.E.

Having established the affinity of apo-lactoferrin for its enteric receptor, competitive receptor binding assays with the lactoferrin mutants were performed as described above to compare their functional activity with that of the wild-type protein. The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 2, B-D. All three iron binding-defective mutants showed no significant differences (<2-fold variation) in their capacity to specifically inhibit the binding of iron-free biotinylated lactoferrin to Caco-2 membranes as compared to wild-type protein. These results indicate that mutation of the tyrosine residues did not disturb the iron-independent receptor binding functional activity of the protein.

Mutation of the Tyrosine Residues Involved in Iron Binding in the NH2-terminal, COOH-terminal, or NH2- and COOH-terminal Lobes of Lactoferrin Selectively Disrupts the Iron-binding Capacity of the Mutated Lobes of the Protein

To confirm that mutation of the two tyrosine residues in either or both lobes of lactoferrin was sufficient to disrupt the iron binding ability of the mutated lobe, iron-saturation analysis using 59FeCl3 was performed. The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 3. In the presence of a 4-fold excess of iron, the wild-type recombinant lactoferrin saturated at a 2:1 molar ratio of iron/protein as expected. Interestingly, while the mutant with an intact COOH-terminal iron-binding function (MN-2Y) saturated at a 1:1 molar ratio, the intact NH2-terminal mutant (MC-2Y) saturated at less than 1:1 ratio indicating some possible iron loss from this mutant at pH 7.0. Hence disruption of the tyrosine residues involved in iron binding in either the amino- or carboxyl-terminal half of lactoferrin selectively abolished the iron-binding ability of only the mutated lobe. In addition, the results from this analysis demonstrated that mutation of all four tyrosine residues involved in iron binding by lactoferrin effectively ablated the iron-binding ability of this protein.


Fig. 3. Iron-saturation analysis of the lactoferrin NH2-terminal (MN-2Y), COOH-terminal (MC-2Y), and NH2- and COOH-terminal (MNC-4Y) iron binding-defective mutants. Iron-free recombinant human lactoferrin (RechLF), MN-2Y, MC-2Y, and MNC-4Y were saturated with iron as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' 59Fe bound to the samples was quantified using liquid scintillation counting, and the iron/protein molar ratios were determined. The data are represented as means ± S.E.

Cooperativity between the NH2- and COOH-terminal Lobes of Lactoferrin Contribute to the Unique Iron-binding Stability of This Protein

Having established that the iron binding-defective mutants were similar to wild-type recombinant lactoferrin, as determined by size, immunoreactivity and receptor-binding analysis, we next analyzed the pH-dependent iron release from these mutants to determine the contribution of the two-lobe structure to the iron-binding stability of lactoferrin. The mutants were saturated with 59FeCl3 and dialyzed against buffers ranging in pH from 7 to 2 for 48 h at 4 °C. The amount of iron remaining bound to the mutants was quantified by liquid scintillation counting. The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 4. The iron release profile from the mutant containing an intact COOH-terminal iron-binding lobe (MN-2Y) was similar to that of recombinant lactoferrin, iron release beginning at a pH of 5.0 and completed at pH 2.0. In contrast, the pH-dependent release of iron from the mutant containing an intact NH2-terminal iron-binding lobe (MC-2Y) was markedly different. Release of iron from this mutant began at a pH of 7.0, which is consistent with the lower than 1:1 iron saturation of this mutant (Fig. 2). In addition, iron release from this mutant was completed at a pH of 5.0. These results indicate that the NH2- and COOH-terminal lobes of lactoferrin differ in their pH stability of iron-binding and a functional iron-binding carboxyl-terminal lobe is required to confer an increased pH stability to the amino-terminal domain that is characteristic of the wild-type protein. Based on these observations, we conclude that cooperative interactions between the two halves of lactoferrin, driven primarily by the COOH-terminal lobe, contribute to the pH stability of iron binding that is unique to this protein.


Fig. 4. pH-dependent release of 59Fe from the lactoferrin NH2-terminal (MN-2Y) and COOH-terminal (MC-2Y) iron binding-defective mutants. 59Fe-saturated recombinant human lactoferrin (RechLF), MN-2Y, and MC-2Y were dialyzed against buffers ranging in pH from 2 to 7. 59Fe remaining bound to the lactoferrin samples after dialysis was quantified by liquid scintillation counting, and the iron/protein molar ratio was determined. The data are represented as means ± S.E.


DISCUSSION

In the present study, we have used a site-directed mutagenesis approach to investigate the contribution of the bilobal structure of lactoferrin to the unique iron-binding properties of this protein. The two tyrosines involved in iron binding in either or both lobes of lactoferrin were mutated to corresponding alanine residues in order to produce three iron binding-defective mutants. These mutants were expressed and purified from A. awamori as described previously for the wild-type protein (17). The size, immunoreactivity, and functional activity of these mutants, as determined by silver stain, Western immunoblotting, and enteric receptor binding analysis were similar to wild-type recombinant human lactoferrin, indicating that the amino acid substitutions had no adverse effect on the protein. Iron saturation analysis using 59FeCl3 showed that while the mutant with an intact COOH-terminal iron-binding lobe saturated at the expected 1:1 ratio of iron to protein, the mutant with an intact NH2-terminal iron-binding function consistently saturated at less than 1:1, suggesting a reduced stability of iron binding to this mutant at pH 7.0. In addition, iron-binding studies demonstrated that mutation of the tyrosine residues in both lobes effectively disrupted the iron-binding capacity of the complete protein.

Interestingly, pH-dependent iron release studies from the nonmutated lobes showed that the stability of iron binding to the NH2- and COOH-terminal lobes of lactoferrin were dissimilar. The release of iron from the mutant containing an intact COOH-terminal iron-binding function was similar to that observed for the native lactoferrin. In contrast, the mutant with an intact NH2-terminal iron-binding site was much more acid-labile, releasing all of its bound iron between a pH of 7 and 5. Hence, despite the overall structural homology between these two lobes (~40%), we demonstrate that the NH2- and COOH-terminal lobes of lactoferrin differ in their pH stability of iron binding. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a functional iron-binding COOH-terminal lobe is required to impart the iron-binding stability to the NH2-terminal lobe which is characteristic of the wild-type protein.

The nonequivalence of iron binding to the amino- and carboxyl-terminal lobes of lactoferrin has been reported previously (36, 41, 42). Studies using a cloned NH2-terminal fragment of human lactoferrin (41) and a proteolytically derived COOH-terminal fragment from bovine lactoferrin (42) have shown a similar disparity in pH dependence of iron binding as reported in this study. However, while the previous reports did indicate that the COOH-terminal lobe, or part thereof, was required to stabilize the NH2-terminal lobe iron-binding function, these studies were limited as it remained to be determined whether the structural presence of the COOH-terminal lobe or a functional COOH-terminal iron-binding activity was required for stabilization of iron binding to the NH2-terminal lobe. In the present report, we extend these studies and show that cooperative interactions, driven primarily by a functional COOH-terminal lobe are necessary for iron-binding stabilization.

The bias for selection of a bilobal structure in the evolution of the transferrin family is unknown. The studies described here provide a functional rationale for this selection in the case of lactoferrin. We show that the evolution of a two-lobe structure has endowed lactoferrin with unique iron-binding properties which are likely to impinge on the unique functional activity of this protein. Interestingly, transferrin differs from lactoferrin in that it has been shown that the pH-dependent iron-release properties of this protein and a proteolytically derived NH2-terminal fragment are similar (36, 43). While inconclusive, these findings may suggest that a lack of cooperativity between the two lobes of transferrin may be a critical factor accounting for the characteristically weaker iron-binding stability of this protein. Taken together with the studies described herein, we suggest that the different iron-binding properties of lactoferrin and transferrin may be due, at least in part, to the evolution of a carboxyl-terminal iron-binding lobe of lactoferrin that has increased acid stability and functions cooperatively with the NH2-terminal lobe to confer a pH stability to this lobe that is characteristic of the bilobal protein.


FOOTNOTES

*   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-798-6233; Fax: 713-790-1275.
1   The abbreviations used are: kb, kilobase pair(s); MN-2Y, NH2-terminal iron binding-defective mutant of human lactoferrin; MC-2Y, COOH-terminal iron binding-defective mutant of human lactoferrin; MNC-4Y, NH2- and COOH-terminal iron binding-defective mutant of human lactoferrin; RechLF, recombinant human lactoferrin.

REFERENCES

  1. Aisen, P., Listowsky, I. (1980) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 49, 357-393 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. MacGillivray, R. T. A., Mendez, E., Shewale, J. G., Sinha, S. K., Lineback-Zins, J., Brew, K. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 3543-3553 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Jeltsch, J.-M., Chambon, P. (1982) Eur. J. Biochem. 122, 291-295 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Rose, T. M., Plowman, G. D., Teplow, D. B., Dreyer, W. J., Hellstrom, K.-E., Brown, J. P. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 1261-1265 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Masson, P. L., Heremans, J. F. (1971) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 39, 119-129 [CrossRef]
  6. Hennart, P. F., Brasseur, D. J., Delogne-Desnoeck, J. B., Dramaix, M. M., Robyn, C. E. (1991) Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 53, 32-39 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Masson, P. L., Heremans, J. F., Dive, C. (1966) Clin. Chim. Acta 14, 735-739 [CrossRef]
  8. Pentecost, B. T., Teng, C. T. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 10134-10139 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Yu, L.-C., Chen, Y.-H. (1993) Biochem. J. 296, 107-111
  10. Masson, P. L., Heremans, J. F., Schonne, E. (1969) J. Exp. Med. 130, 643-658 [Abstract]
  11. Fransson, G.-B., Lonnerdal, B. (1980) J. Pediatr. 96, 380-384 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Iyer, S., Lonnerdal, B. (1993) Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 47, 232-241 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Cox, T. M., Mazurier, J., Spik, G., Montreuil, J., Peters, T. J. (1979) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 558, 129-141
  14. Hu, W.-L., Mazurier, J., Sawatzki, G., Montreuil, J., Spik, G. (1988) Biochem. J. 249, 435-441 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Gislason, J., Douglas, G. C., Hutchens, T. W., Lonnerdal, B. (1995) J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 21, 37-43 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Mikogami, T., Heyman, M., Spik, G., Desjeux, J.-F. (1994) Am. J. Physiol. 267, G1-G8
  17. Ward, P. P., Piddington, C. S., Cunningham, G. A., Zhou, X., Wyatt, R. D., Conneely, O. M. (1995) Bio/Technology 13, 498-503 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Oram, J. D., Reiter, B. (1968) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 170, 351-365 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Arnold, R. R., Cole, M. F., McGhee, J. R. (1977) Science 197, 263-265 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ellison, R. T., Giehl, T.-J., LaForce, F. M. (1988) Infect. Immun. 56, 2774-2781 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Bellamy, W., Takase, M., Yamauchi, K., Wakabayashi, H., Kawase, K., Tomita, M. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1121, 130-136 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Yamauchi, K., Tomita, M., Giehl, T. J., Ellison, R. T. (1993) Infect. Immun. 61, 719-728 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Hashizume, S., Kuroda, K., Murakami, A. (1983) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 763, 377-382 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Nichols, B. L., McKee, K., Henry, J. F., Putman, M. (1987) Pediatr. Res. 21, 563-567 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Sawatzki, G., Rich, I. N. (1989) Blood Cells 15, 371-385 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Broxmeyer, H. E., Williams, D. E., Hangoc, G., Cooper, S., Gentile, P., Shen, R. N., Ralph, P., Gillis, S., Bicknell, D. C. (1987) Blood Cells 13, 31-48 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Zucali, J. R., Broxmeyer, H. E., Ulatowski, J. A. (1979) Blood 54, 951-954 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Machnicki, M., Zimecki, M., Zagulski, T. (1993) Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 74, 433-439 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Crouch, S. P. M., Slater, K. J., Fletcher, J. (1992) Blood 80, 235-240 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Zagulski, T., Lipinski, P., Zagulska, A., Broniek, S., Jarzabek, Z. (1989) Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 70, 697-704 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Metz-Boutigue, M.-H., Jolles, J., Mazurier, J., Schoertger, F., Legrand, D., Spik, G., Montreuil, J., Jolles, P. (1984) Eur. J. Biochem. 145, 659-676 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Anderson, B. F., Baker, H. M., Norris, G. E., Rice, D. W., Baker, E. N. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 209, 711-734 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Lindley, P. F., Mydin, A., Sarra, R., Watson, J. L. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 5804-5812 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Williams, J. (1982) Trends Biochem. Sci. 7, 394-397 [CrossRef]
  35. Baker, E. N., Lindley, P. F. (1992) J. Inorg. Biochem. 47, 147-160 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  36. Mazurier, J., Spik, G. (1980) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 629, 399-408 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Gatignol, A. (1987) Mol. Gen. Genet. 207, 342-348 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Vilja, P., Krohn, K., Tuohimaa, P. (1985) J. Immunol. Methods 76, 73-83 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Masson, P. L., Heremans, J. F. (1968) Eur. J. Biochem. 6, 579-584 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Rejman, J. J., Turner, J. D., Oliver, S. P. (1994) Int. J. Biochem. 26, 201-206 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. Day, C. L., Stowell, K. M., Baker, E. N., Tweedie, J. W. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13857-13862 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Shimazaki, K.-I., Tanaka, T., Kon, H., Oota, K., Kawaguchi, A., Maki, Y., Sato, T. (1993) J. Dairy Sci. 76, 946-955 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Lineback-Zins, J., Brew, K. (1980) J. Biol. Chem. 255, 708-713 [Free Full Text]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Wally, P. J. Halbrooks, C. Vonrhein, M. A. Rould, S. J. Everse, A. B. Mason, and S. K. Buchanan
The Crystal Structure of Iron-free Human Serum Transferrin Provides Insight into Inter-lobe Communication and Receptor Binding
J. Biol. Chem., August 25, 2006; 281(34): 24934 - 24944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. M. Baker, B. F. Anderson, and E. N. Baker
Bioinorganic Chemistry Special Feature: Dealing with iron: Common structural principles in proteins that transport iron and heme
PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 3579 - 3583.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. T. Teng, C. Beard, and W. Gladwell
Differential Expression and Estrogen Response of Lactoferrin Gene in the Female Reproductive Tract of Mouse, Rat, and Hamster
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2002; 67(5): 1439 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Kurokawa, J. C. Dewan, B. Mikami, J. C. Sacchettini, and M. Hirose
Crystal Structure of Hen Apo-ovotransferrin. BOTH LOBES ADOPT AN OPEN CONFORMATION UPON LOSS OF IRON
J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 1999; 274(40): 28445 - 28452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Conneely, O. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Conneely, O. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.