Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Durden, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Durden, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 23, Issue of June 7, 1996 pp. 13342-13348
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

A Role for Shc, Grb2, and Raf-1 in Fcgamma RI Signal Relay*

(Received for publication, November 27, 1995, and in revised form, February 13, 1996)

Rae Kil Park Dagger §, Yenbou Liu Dagger and Donald L. Durden Dagger

From the Dagger  Neil Bogart Memorial Laboratories, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles and University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90027

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

The activation of the serine/threonine kinase, Raf-1, serves to connect upstream protein tyrosine kinases to downstream signaling events. We previously reported that Fcgamma RI stimulation of interferon gamma -differentiated U937 cells (termed U937IF cells) induces a mobility shift in Erk2. Herein, we report that cross-linking of Fcgamma RI receptor in U937IF cells induces a marked tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 (10-fold increase). Tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 is induced by Fcgamma RI activation and not by PMA (1 µg/ml), N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (1 µM), calcium ionophore (1 µM), thrombin (0.05 unit/ml), Fcgamma RII, or Fcgamma RIII stimulation. The kinetics of Raf-1 tyrosine phosphorylation is rapid, reaching peak levels 1-2 min after Fcgamma RI activation, and the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 precedes the activation of the respiratory burst. Fcgamma RI cross-linking induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc; tyrosine-phosphorylated Shc binds to Grb2 forming a Shc-Grb2 complex. The data provide evidence that the Fcgamma RI receptor signals via the upstream activation of nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinases, which leads to the subsequent activation of Ras family GTPases and serine/threonine kinases, Raf-1 and mitogen-activated protein kinase.


INTRODUCTION

Phosphorylation on tyrosine, serine, or threonine residues is a key regulatory mechanism in mammalian cells used to regulate the mitogenic or oncogenic potential of proteins by augmenting their enzymatic activity or modifying their association with other signal transducers (1). In this manner, Raf-1 activity also appears to be regulated by phosphorylation of key serine/threonine and tyrosine residues in that kinase activity correlates with the phosphorylation state of the Raf-1 protein (2). Raf-1 is rapidly phosphorylated and activated following stimulation with growth factors and mitogens (3). Kovacina et al. (4) demonstrated that treatment with phosphatase remarkably decreased the catalytic activity of Raf-1 in insulin-stimulated cells. While Raf-1 is exclusively phosphorylated on serine residue in resting and mitogen-stimulated cells, it has been demonstrated that phosphorylation of Raf-1 increased on threonine and tyrosine residues after IL-2 or TCR stimulation (5). However, the stoichiometry of tyrosine phosphorylation is low compared to the extent of serine/threonine phosphorylation. Ser43, Ser259, and Ser621 are known to be major in vivo phosphorylation sites in mammalian and Sf9 insect cells expressing human Raf-1 proteins. Phosphorylation of both Ser259 and Ser621 modify the catalytic activity of Raf-1 (6).

Although tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 has been demonstrated in several systems, including IL-3-1 and granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor-stimulated murine myeloid cells (7), IL-2-treated murine T cells (8), platelet-derived growth factor-stimulated or v-src-transformed murine fibroblasts (2, 3), the biological relevance of this phosphorylation has not yet been clarified. Fabien et al. (9) recently suggested an importance for the tyrosine phosphorylation in regulating the biological activity of Raf-1 and identified Tyr340 and Tyr341 as major tyrosine phosphorylation sites of Raf-1. They demonstrated the phosphorylation of Tyr340 and Tyr341 by coexpressing Raf-1 with the activated tyrosine kinase, pp60v-src, in baculovirus Sf9 cells (9). More recently the data of Pulmiglia et al. (10) has defined in more detail the NH2 terminus of Raf-1, demonstrating that in certain systems the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 alone is sufficient to activate Raf-1 kinase activity. In these experiments, mutation of residues 53-156 required for Ras-Raf-1 binding abrogated activation by Ras but had no effect on activation of Raf-1 by activated Src in Sf9 cell system. These and other data suggest that several independent mechanisms may exist for the regulation of Raf-1. This is a paradigm which may play itself out more than once in mammalian signal relay.

Raf-1, the proto-oncogene product of the c-raf-1 gene which is the cellular homologue of the murine transforming gene v-raf, is a 72-76-kDa phosphoprotein with intrinsic kinase activity for serine and threonine residues (2). Raf-1 is an effector of Ras and is one of the activators of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) (11). Sequence analysis suggests that Raf family proteins have three unique conserved domains, named conserved region 1 (CR1), CR2, and CR3 (12). CR1 is a cysteine-rich residue having a putative zinc binding region. CR2 is a serine/threonine-rich region, and CR3 contains the protein kinase domain. Both CR1 and CR2 are located in the amino-terminal half of the Raf-1, which appears to regulate the catalytic activity of carboxyl-terminal kinase domain. The v-Raf protein of murine sarcoma virus 3611 is observed to have a deletion of the amino-terminal half of the protein. Deletion or mutation of the amino terminus activates the oncogenic transforming potential of Raf-1 (13, 14). In protein kinase cascades, Raf-1 appears to be a central intermediate in the transmission of proliferative, developmental, and oncogenic signals by mediating signals from receptor or nonreceptor tyrosine kinases, from p21ras to serine/threonine kinases, including MAP kinase kinase, MEK, MAP kinase, or ribosomal S6 kinase (RSK) ultimately leading to activation of transcriptional factor, such as NF-kappa B/Rel, in the nucleus (15, 16, 17). The role of Raf-1 in post-mitotic cells is less clear.

Proteins of the Fcgamma R family have a number of conserved biological characteristics of multisubunit Ig supergene family (18, 19). Fcgamma Rs, receptors for the Fc portion of IgG, are composed of three groups including Fcgamma RI (CD64), Fcgamma RII (CD32), or Fcgamma RIII (CD16) according to their binding affinity for the ligand. Fcgamma RI, found in monocytes and macrophages, is a 74-kDa glycoprotein that binds monomeric IgG with high affinity (20, 21). The Fcgamma RI receptor signaling via a conserved sequence of amino acids termed the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based motif (ITAM) (22). Signaling through the ITAM shares a number of conserved features among the Ig gene superfamily of multisubunit receptors (23). We and others have reported that the Fcgamma RI receptor stimulation results in the sequential activation of Fcgamma RIgamma , Hck, Syk and MAP kinase (24). The Fcgamma RI receptor is also linked to the cytoskeleton and is involved in a number of well characterized cell biologic signals (activation of respiratory burst, phagocytosis, or cell motility, etc.). Importantly, the myeloid respiratory burst is a well characterized response known to be regulated by small GTPases, Rac1, Rac2, and Rap1a (25). It is tempting to speculate that the respiratory burst may be also regulated by the known effectors of these GTPases (i.e. Raf-1 or PAK65, etc.) (26).

Cross-linking of Fcgamma R induces activation events, including tyrosine phosphorylation of gamma  subunit (27) and activation of phospholipase C-gamma 1 and gamma 2 (28), increases phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and calcium mobilization (29), production of cytokines (30), and generation of superoxide anions (31). Our laboratory uses the myeloid cell line U937 differentiated in IFNgamma (termed U937IF cells) to study Fcgamma RI signal transduction. We are interested in the mechanism by which signals are transmitted from Fcgamma RI receptor to the respiratory burst. We previously reported that the stimulation of Fcgamma RI receptor in U937IF cells results in tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of Syk (32). More recently we demonstrated that Fcgamma RI cross-linking activated Src family kinase, Hck and a mobility shift of MAP kinase (33). These results lead us to hypothesize a role for Raf-1 in Fcgamma RI signal relay. Herein, we demonstrate that Raf-1 is tyrosine-phosphorylated after Fcgamma RI stimulation (10-fold increase). Both Hck and Syk are activated following Fcgamma RI stimulation, making them good candidate kinases for the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1. We also observe the tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc and the association of Shc and Grb2 in U937IF cells activated by Fcgamma RI stimulation (not Fcgamma RII or Fcgamma RIII activation). Our results suggest that Raf-1 is major substrate for protein tyrosine kinases following Fcgamma RI cross-linking, which results the sequential activation of Shc, Grb2, Ras, Raf-1, and MAP kinases transmitting Fcgamma RI signals that result in the assembly of an active respiratory burst complex.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Antibodies

The Fcgamma R-specific antibodies were obtained from Medarex Inc. (West Lebanon, NH). The mAb 197 and mAb 32.2 are specific for the Fcgamma RIalpha subunit, mAb 32.2 is a F(ab')2 fragment of IgG, mAb IV.3 is specific for Fcgamma RIIalpha subunit, and mAb 3G8 is specific for Fcgamma RIIIalpha subunit of Fc receptor for IgG. The cross-linking antibody was a rabbit anti-mouse F(ab')2 fragment (Ralpha M) purchased from Organon Teknika Corp. (West Chester, PA). Anti-Raf-1 antibody was purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). Anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-Tyr(P)) and anti-Shc antibodies were purchased from Upstate Biotechnology, Inc. (Lake Placid, NY), and anti-Grb2 antibody was obtained from Transduction Laboratories (Lexington, KY). The anti-MAP kinase antiserum (polyclonal antibody 1913.2) against the peptide KELIFEETARFQPGY, corresponding to the extreme COOH terminus of the Xenopus Erk2, was provided by Jonathan A. Cooper, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (Seattle, WA). This region of the Xenopus MAP kinase is 100% conserved with human Erk2 and 85% conserved in human Erk1 (34).

Differentiation and Stimulation of U937 Cells

U937 cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 with 10% fetal calf serum and differentiated with 250 units/ml human recombinant IFNgamma (kindly provided by Genentech Corp., San Francisco, CA) for 4 days. U937IF cells were cultured at a concentration of 5 × 105 cells/ml, and the medium was replenished with fresh IFNgamma (250 units/ml) every 2 days, as described (35). Flow cytometric analysis of U937IF cells demonstrated equal expression of Fcgamma RI, Fcgamma RII, and Fcgamma RIII (data not shown). For stimulation of Fcgamma R receptors of U937IF cells, cells were washed twice in cold HBSS and adjusted to a concentration of 4 × 107 cells/ml. Cells in a 0.5-ml volume were incubated on ice for 30 min with anti-Fcgamma R antibodies (0.25 µg/sample). We then added 10 µg/ml Ralpha M (F(ab')2 fragment) antibody at 37 °C for different times. Stimulated cells were cooled rapidly with cold HBSS and centrifuged at 500 × g for 5 min in a cold centrifuge. A cell pellet was lysed with 800 µl of Triton X-100 extraction buffer (EB buffer) on ice for 30 min or resuspended in 25 µl of 1 × sample buffer/2 × 106 cells for whole cell lysates.

Immunoprecipitation

Cell lysates were prepared in a lysis buffer (EB buffer) containing 1% Triton X-100, 10 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 50 mM NaCl, 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1% aprotinin, 5 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF, 0.1% 2-mercaptoethanol, 5 µM phenylarsine oxide, and 100 µM sodium orthovanadate. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 45 min at 4 °C. For precipitation of Raf-1 protein, we added 10 µl of the polyclonal anti-Raf-1 antibody to cleared cell lysates. After incubation on ice for 2 h, 100 µl of a 10% solution of formalin-fixed Staphylococcus aureus was added to the anti-Raf-1 immunoprecipitates and incubated on ice for 1 h. The absorbed immune complexes were washed three times in EB buffer and resuspended with 25 µl of 1 × sample buffer. After boiling at 98 °C for 5 min, samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE.

Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting

Immunoprecipitates were resolved on 10% acrylamide, 0.193% bisacrylamide gels by SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (1 mAh/cm2) using a dry transfer system (Alert Inc., Seattle, WA), as described (36). The blot was incubated with blocking solution (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 5% powdered milk) for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with specific anti-phosphotyrosine (anti-Tyr(P)), anti-Raf-1, anti-Shc, anti-Grb2, or anti-MAP kinase antibodies for 2 h at room temperature with continuous agitation. After three washes in rinse solution (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl), the membranes were incubated at room temperature for 1 h with secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase for enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL, Amersham Corp.) or conjugated with alkaline phosphatase for colorimetric development. To reprobe the membrane, we stripped membrane with 0.1 M glycine, pH 2.5, at room temperature for 30 min and then reblotted with primary antibody.

Respiratory Burst

The generation of superoxide anions by U937IF cells was measured as the superoxide dismutase-inhibitable reduction of ferricytochrome c at 550 nm in a microtiter plate reader (Molecular Devices Inc., Menlo Park, CA), using air-oxidized and dithionite-reduced cytochrome c as standards. Cells were preincubated for 10 min at 37 °C in HBSS in the wells of a 96-well microtiter plate. The final reaction mixture contained 2 × 106 U937IF cells and 80 µM ferricytochrome c in 250 µl of HBSS. One-half of the wells received superoxide dismutase (25 µg/ml). After the addition of antibodies or various agonists, the plates were incubated at 37 °C and agitated. Serial spectrometric determination was recorded to construct a kinetic curve for the production of superoxide anion. Maximum reduction of ferricytochrome c (25 nm) was achieved by adding 5 µl of freshly prepared sodium dithionite. Production of superoxide anion is expressed as nanomoles of superoxide-dismutase-inhibitable cytochrome c reduction/2 × 106 cells.


RESULTS

Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Raf-1 upon Fcgamma RI Activation

To evaluate the involvement of Raf-1 in Fcgamma RI signaling, we examined whether Raf-1 is tyrosine-phosphorylated after Fcgamma RI stimulation in U937IF cells. Lysates of 2 × 107 U937IF cells were immunoblotted for Raf-1 after differentiation in IFNgamma . IFNgamma increased the expression of p74 Raf-1 (3-fold increase). Raf-1 expression directly correlated with the length of exposure to IFNgamma and peaked at 4 days after differentiation (data not shown). We subsequently used U937IF cells differentiated for 4 days with IFNgamma for all experiments. To determine whether Fcgamma RI cross-linking can induce the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 in myeloid cells, 2 × 107 U937IF cells were first incubated with mAb 197, followed by stimulation with Ralpha M. We immunoprecipitated Raf-1 from resting or Fcgamma RI-stimulated U937IF cells with a rabbit anti-Raf-1 antibody and performed anti-Tyr(P) immunoblots (mAb 4G10) (Fig. 1). Marked tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 was detected after cross-linking of Fcgamma RI receptor (10-fold increase) (Fig. 1A, lanes 6-8). The tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 is very rapid and reaches its maximum response 30 s to 1 min after stimulation (Fig. 1A, lanes 6 and 7). Raf-1 was not tyrosine-phosphorylated in resting cells (Fig. 1A, lane 3) or in U937IF cells stimulated with Fcgamma RI alone or Ralpha M alone (Fig. 1A, lanes 4 and 5). To confirm the identity of the 74-kDa protein, the membrane was stripped and reprobed for Raf-1 (Fig. 1B). All lanes except sham and preimmune immunoprecipitates brought down an equivalent amount of Raf-1 protein (Fig. 1B, lanes 3-8). The p74 immunoreactive bands of anti-Raf-1 immunoblot is superimposed on tyrosine-phosphorylated bands in anti-Raf-1 immunoprecipitates. The results show that Raf-1 immunoprecipitated from Fcgamma RI activated cells is tyrosine-phosphorylated. In other experiments, separate immunoblots of rabbit anti-Raf-1 immunoprecipitates were probed with mouse anti-Tyr(P) or mouse anti-Raf-1 antibodies. The results were exactly the same as our findings previously shown in Fig. 1. Parallel blots of anti-Raf-1 immunoprecipitates, probed with secondary antibody alone, showed no Raf-1 band. Finally, the whole cell lysate confirmed the integrity of our Raf-1 immunoblots (Fig. 1, lane 9). We suggest that the observed difference in intensity of the p74 band in the whole cell lysate versus the anti-Raf-1 immunoprecipitates is due to the presence of more than one p72-74 phosphoprotein with similar electrophoretic mobility. Evidence to support this conclusion include the identification of Raf-1 and Syk kinases as components of the p72-74 phosphoprotein bands (32).


Fig. 1. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 upon Fcgamma RI activation in U937IF cells. A, anti-Raf-1 IPs from 2 × 107 U937IF cells were immunoblotted for phosphotyrosine (lanes 1-9). Lane 1 is a sham IP without lysate from anti-Raf-1 immunoprecipitation procedure. Lane 2 represents an IP with preimmune serum. Other lanes correspond to: resting U937IF cells (lane 3), U937IF cells incubated with anti-Fcgamma RI antibody (mAb 197) alone for 1 min (lane 4), U937IF cells stimulated with Ralpha M alone for 1 min (lane 5), and U937IF cells activated by anti-Fcgamma RI cross-linking and Ralpha M stimulation for 0.5, 1, or 5 min (lanes 6-8, respectively). Lane 9 is a whole lysate of Fcgamma RI-stimulated U937IF cells. B, after probing with anti-Tyr(P), the same blot was stripped and reprobed for Raf-1. The tyrosine-phosphorylated p74 bands is superimposed on the Raf-1 band.

To confirm these results, we performed anti-Tyr(P) immunoprecipitation using agarose-conjugated anti-Tyr(P) antibodies on resting and Fcgamma RI-stimulated U937IF cells. We probed these immunoprecipitates with rabbit anti-Raf-1 antibody (Fig. 2A). Only anti-Tyr(P) immunoprecipitate from Fcgamma RI activated reacted specifically with anti-Raf-1 antibody (Fig. 2A, lane 3). Fcgamma RIII activation did not induce tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 (Fig. 2A, lane 4). When the membrane was stripped and reprobed for phosphotyrosine, the tyrosine-phosphorylated Raf-1 band was superimposed on the upper band of anti-Tyr(P) immunoblot indicated (Fig. 2B, lane 3). The whole cell lysate confirmed the integrity of anti-Tyr(P) and anti-Raf-1 immunoblots (Fig. 2B, lane 5). We observe a diminished number of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in our anti-Tyr(P) immunoprecipitates as compared to the whole cell lysates. This is likely due to decreased efficiency of immunoprecipitation by the agarose-conjugated anti-Tyr(P) antibody. The loss of membrane-bound proteins during stripping and washing may decrease the resolution of tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins in our anti-Tyr(P) immunoblot. These data confirm the results shown in Fig. 1 and reveal that Raf-1 is tyrosine-phosphorylated upon Fcgamma RI activation.


Fig. 2. Anti-Raf-1 immunoblot of anti-Tyr(P) immunoprecipitates from U937IF cells stimulated by Fcgamma RI and Fcgamma RIII cross-linking. A, 2 × 107 U937IF cells were preincubated with mouse anti-Fcgamma RI (lane 3) or anti-Fcgamma RIII (F(ab')2 fragment of anti-CD16, lane 4), followed by stimulation with Ralpha M antibody. Tyrosine-phosphorylated Raf-1 from U937IF lysate was immunoprecipitated with mouse anti-Tyr(P) antibody agarose-conjugated and immunoblotted with rabbit anti-Raf-1 antisera (lanes 2-4). Lane 1 is an IP with preimmune antisera from U937IF lysate (PI). Lane 2 is an anti-Tyr(P) IP of resting U937IF cells (NS). B, the same blot was stripped and reprobed with mouse anti-Tyr(P). Lane 5 is a whole cell lysates of Fcgamma RI cross-linked U937IF cells. The tyrosine-phosphorylated Raf-1 band is superimposed on the upper one of phosphotyrosine bands indicated.

Kinetics of Raf-1 Tyrosine Phosphorylation

We determined the kinetics of Raf-1 tyrosine phosphorylation upon Fcgamma RI activation and its relation to respiratory burst, a signaling pathway in myeloid cells known to be modulated by GTPases Rac and Rap1a (25, 26). Tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 occurs 20 s after Fcgamma RI stimulation (Fig. 3A, lane 5) and reached a peak around 1-2 min (Fig. 3A, lanes 7 and 8) and disappeared 10 min after stimulation (Fig. 3A, lane 10). The respiratory burst begins 3-5 min after Fcgamma RI activation (Fig. 3B). Fcgamma RI cross-linking activated respiratory burst to produce 2.2 nM superoxide from 2 × 106 cells 10 min after stimulation and showed peak response 30 min after stimulation. PMA also stimulated the respiratory response to produce superoxide anion, but its maximum response was delayed compared to activation of respiratory burst through Fcgamma RI stimulation. The respiratory burst is preceded by the tyrosine phosphorylation of Syk, Hck, MAP kinases, and Raf-1, suggesting that Raf-1 could function upstream in the Fcgamma RI signal pathway leading to the activation of the respiratory burst response (32, 33).


Fig. 3. Kinetics of tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 and respiratory burst upon Fcgamma RI activation. A, time course of tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 activation for various periods. Lane 1 is a sham IP. Lane 2 is an IP with preimmune serum. Other lanes correspond to: Raf-1 IP of resting U937IF cells (lane 3), cells stimulated with Fcgamma RI alone for 1 min (lane 4), U937IF cells incubated with mAb 197 (lanes 5-10), followed by stimulation with Ralpha M antisera for 0.2 (lane 5), 0.5 (lane 6), 1 (lane 7), 2 (lane 8), 5 (lane 9), or 10 min (lane 10), respectively. Lane 12 is a whole cell lysate of Fcgamma RI-stimulated U937IF cells. B, the respiratory burst was quantitated by measuring superoxide production as the superoxide dismutase inhibitable reduction of ferricytochrome c detailed under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Data shown are mean ± S.D. of triplicates in each experimental group.

Tyrosine Phosphorylation of Raf-1 Is Specific in Fcgamma RI Activation Pathway

To determine whether the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 we observed is specific for Fcgamma RI activation, we determined the effect of cross-linking of other Fcgamma receptors, such as Fcgamma RII and Fcgamma RIII, as well as stimulation with other agonists, such as PMA (1 µg/ml), FMLP (1 µM), calcium ionophore (1 µM), or thrombin (0.05 unit/ml), on tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 (Fig. 4). In these experiments, we immunoprecipitated an equivalent amount of Raf-1 (Fig. 4B, lanes 3-14). Only Fcgamma RI stimulation of U937IF cells resulted in the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 (Fig. 4A, lanes 11 and 12). PMA, FMLP, calcium ionophore, and thrombin did not induce the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 (Fig. 4A, lanes 4-7). Similarly, Fcgamma RII or Fcgamma RIII cross-linking did not induce the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 (Fig. 4A, lanes 8, 9, 13, and 14). These results indicate that Fcgamma RI stimulation specifically induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1. Interestingly, Fcgamma RIII stimulation is not observed to induce the respiratory burst in U937IF cells, nor does it induce a mobility shift in MAP kinase, or the activation of Hck or Syk kinases (Fig. 6, lanes 11 and 12) (32, 33). Lane 15, a whole cell lysate of U937IF cells stimulated with Fcgamma RI, shows the prominent 74-kDa tyrosine-phosphorylated Raf-1 specific band.


Fig. 4. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 is specific for Fcgamma RI activation. A, anti-Raf-1 IPs from U937IF lysates after stimulation of Fcgamma Rs and various agonists were immunoblotted for phosphotyrosine (lanes 3-14). Lane 1 is a sham IP. Lane 2 shows a preimmune serum IP. Other lanes correspond to: resting U937IF cells (lane 3), cells stimulated with 1 µg/ml PMA (lane 4), 1 µM FMLP (lane 5), 1 µM Ca2+ ionophore (lane 6), 0.05 unit/ml thrombin (lane 7), anti-Fcgamma RII alone (lane 8), anti-Fcgamma RIII alone (lane 9), Ralpha M alone (lane 10), Fcgamma RI activation for 1 min (lane 11) or 5 min (lane 12), Fcgamma RII activation for 1 min (lane 13), or Fcgamma RIII activation for 1 min (lane 14). Lane 15 is an U937IF lysate prepared from Fcgamma RI-stimulated cells. B, the same blot was stripped and reprobed with anti-Raf-1. Raf-1 bands are superimposed on tyrosine-phosphorylated bands in lanes 11 and 12.


Fig. 6. A mobility shift of MAP kinase upon Fcgamma RI activation. Anti-MAP kinase immunoblotting carried out on whole lysates of resting U937IF cells (NS, lane 1) stimulated with PMA (1 µg/ml, lane 2), Fcgamma RI (mAb 197) alone (lane 3), Fcgamma RI (mAb 32.3) alone (lane 4), Fcgamma RIII (mAb 3G8) alone (lane 5), Ralpha M alone (lane 6), Fcgamma RI (mAb 197) plus Ralpha M for 1 and 5 min (lanes 7 and 8, respectively), Fcgamma RI (mAb 32.2) plus Ralpha M for 1 min (lane 9) or 5 min (lane 10), or Fcgamma RIII plus Ralpha M for 1 min (lane 11) or 5 min (lane 12). Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE (10%) under reducing conditions, transferred to nitrocellulose, and immunoblotted with anti-MAP kinase (1913.2) as detailed under ``Experimental Procedures.''

Shc Is Tyrosine-phosphorylated after Fcgamma RI Activation

One mechanism for the activation of Raf-1 is the direct physical interaction with Ras-GTP, which is positively regulated by Grb2-SOS complex (5, 11). We performed experiments to determine if Shc becomes tyrosine-phosphorylated after Fcgamma RI stimulation. Shc was immunoprecipitated with rabbit anti-Shc antibody from U937IF lysates prepared from resting or Fcgamma RI-stimulated cells and immunoblotted with mouse anti-Tyr(P) antibody (Fig. 5A, lanes 3-11). We observed that the p52 isoform of Shc is tyrosine-phosphorylated after Fcgamma RI activation (Fig. 5A, lane 8). Anti-Shc immunoblot confirmed that the anti-Shc immunoprecipitation brought down the same as amount of p46 and p52 Shc proteins (Fig. 5C, lanes 3-11). The tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc is required for recruitment of a Shc-Grb2 physical interaction. The tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc and coprecipitation of Shc and Grb2 were observed only under condition of Fcgamma RI activation (Fig. 5B, lanes 8 and 9). Lane 12 represents a whole cell lysate of U937IF cells and confirms the integrity of anti-Grb2 and anti-Shc immunoblots. These results suggest that Shc is involved in Fcgamma RI signaling pathway and Grb2 associates with Shc in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent manner during Fcgamma RI activation. In other experiments, we have observed a physical interaction between the Shc-SH2 domain and the Fcgamma RIgamma subunit.2


Fig. 5. Shc is phosphorylated and associates with Grb2 upon Fcgamma RI activation. A, lane 1 is a sham IP. Lane 2 is a preimmune serum IP. Shc IPs were probed with anti-Tyr(P) antibody. Other lanes are: resting U937IF cells (lane 3), U937IF cells stimulated with PMA (1 µg/ml) (lane 4), Fcgamma RI alone (lane 5), Fcgamma RIII alone (lane 6), Ralpha M alone (lane 7), Fcgamma RI activated for 1 min (lane 8) or 5 min (lane 9), Fcgamma RII activated for 1 min (lane 10), or Fcgamma RIII activated for 1 min (lane 11). Lane 12, whole cell lysate of U937IF cells, shows position of Grb2 and Shc specific bands. The heavy chain of immunoglobulin G is indicated as H-chain of IgG. B, the lower part of same blot was immunoblotted for Grb2. The light chain of IgG is indicated as L-chain. C, the same part of A was stripped and reprobed for Shc. The tyrosine-phosphorylated Shc in A is superimposed on p52 isoform of Shc.

Mobility Shift of Erk2 upon Fcgamma RI Activation

We examined the activation of MAP kinase in U937IF cells stimulated with Fcgamma RI cross-linking (Fig. 6). Two bands of MAP kinases are detected in resting U937IF cells corresponding to Erk1 and Erk2, based on the molecular mass values of 42 and 44 kDa, respectively. We observed a mobility shift in MAP kinase in U937IF cells upon Fcgamma RI stimulation with mAb 197 (Fig. 6, lanes 8 and 9) or mAb 32.2 (Fig. 6, lane 11) of Fcgamma RI receptor. The kinetics of a mobility shift of MAP kinase is different. Stimulation of Fcgamma RI with mAb 197 induces MAP kinase mobility shift, reaching its peak around 1 min after Fcgamma RI stimulation (Fig. 6, lanes 7 and 8). In contrast, stimulation with mAb 32.2 shows a strong band of mobility shift 5 min after stimulation (Fig. 6, lanes 9 and 10). PMA also induced a mobility shift of MAP kinase (Fig. 6, lane 3). We confirmed that each lane was loaded with an equivalent amount of total protein by Coomassie Blue staining of gel. The mobility shift of MAP kinase induced by Fcgamma RI stimulation likely represents a phosphorylation of Erk2, resulting in a retarded migration on SDS-PAGE. No appreciable mobility shift was observed in U937IF cells stimulated with primary antibodies alone (Fig. 6, lanes 3-5), secondary antibody alone (Fig. 6, lane 6), and Fcgamma RIII cross-linking (Fig. 6, lanes 11 and 12).


DISCUSSION

The activity of Raf-1 appears to be regulated by multiple mechanisms in mammalian signaling. The presence of a cysteine-rich motif in CR1 suggests that certain modulatory lipids may function on the allosteric regulation of Raf-1 activity (37). The beta  isoform of the 14-3-3 family of proteins was also identified as a Raf-1 activator in NIH 3T3 cells (38). Several lines of evidence suggest that phosphorylation and/or alteration of the amino-terminal regulatory domain may be a mechanism for the regulation of Raf-1 activity. NH2-terminal truncation of the Raf-1 cDNA modifies the catalytic activity of Raf-1. Many growth factors stimulate Raf-1 phosphorylation on serine, predominantly, and tyrosine residues in the NH2 terminus (9, 39, 40, 41, 42). Phosphorylation of Ser259 and/or Ser621 regulates Raf-1 activity and correlates with the enhancement of Raf-1 activity in response to various mitogens. In addition, mutation of two in vivo serine phosphorylation sites alters the activity of Raf-1 (15). Morrison et al. have recently reported that tyrosine phosphorylation regulates the activity of Raf-1, since a mutant containing a tyrosine to phenylalanine mutation at Tyr340 and Tyr341 sites is not activated and since a truncated Raf-1 lacking tyrosine residues between positions 26 and 303 of amino terminus modifies the function of Raf-1 (43). However, the molecular basis by which tyrosine phosphorylation alters Raf-1 activity is unknown. In this study, we demonstrated that Raf-1 is tyrosine-phosphorylated upon Fcgamma RI stimulation, suggesting that Raf-1 is involved in Fcgamma RI signal transduction. Recent studies have showed that Raf-1 is tyrosine-phosphorylated in response to growth factors including platelet-derived growth factor, IL-2, IL-3, granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor, or insulin (4, 5, 8, 44). Platelet-derived growth factor treatment of NIH 3T3 or Chinese hamster ovary cells induces the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1, which activates its serine/threonine enzymatic activity (3). Herein, we showed that Fcgamma RI cross-linking of U937IF cells with mAb 197 and Ralpha M induces tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 (Fig. 1, lanes 6-8). Ongoing experiments will determine if tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 upon Fcgamma RI stimulation coincide with the increase of catalytic activity. The kinetics of tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 upon Fcgamma RI is similar to the effect of many growth factors (Fig. 3A). It occurs very rapidly and reaches a peak 1-2 min after Fcgamma RI stimulation and quickly returns to base line.

The respiratory burst is well described, and its molecular components have been cloned, including p47phox, p67phox, gp91 and p22, Rac1, Rac2, and Rap1a (45, 46). The respiratory burst response can be reconstituted in vitro using recombinant proteins or membrane preparations, making it an excellent model for study of mammalian signal relay (47) (Fig. 7). The respiratory burst in neutrophils, induced through stimulation with PMA or heterotrimeric G proteins, is regulated by serine phosphorylation and the conversion small GTPases Rac and Rap1a to their GTP-bound state (48). Gabig et al. (47) recently reported that the expression of dominant negative mutants of Rac and Rap1a blocks the FMLP-induced respiratory burst in HL-60 cells. Considerable similarity exists between effect of FMLP and Fc receptor signaling (49). Dusi et al. (50) have reported a potential role for MAP kinase in regulation of respiratory burst more recently. The respiratory burst of U937IF cells occurring after Fcgamma RI stimulation is less well described but likely is regulated similarly (Fig. 3B) (51). The respiratory burst begins around 5 min and reaches maximal response around 30 min after Fcgamma RI stimulation. Interestingly, the Fcgamma RI-induced respiratory burst occurs subsequent to tyrosine phosphorylation of Hck, Syk, and Raf-1. PMA also activates the respiratory burst response, but its kinetics differs from the Fcgamma RI stimulation. Ongoing experiments seek to determine if the respiratory burst is regulated by the tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of these nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinases and Raf-1. To answer the Raf-1 question, we will overexpress the dominant inhibitory Raf-1 mutant containing tyrosine to phenylalanine mutation at Tyr340 and/or Tyr341 sites in U937IF cells followed by phenotypic analysis of Fcgamma RI-induced signals in these cells.


Fig. 7. Schematic representation for Fcgamma RI signaling to the respiratory burst. Fcgamma RI signaling involves the binding of the Fcgamma RIalpha and gamma  subunits to ligand, resulting in a conformation change in alpha  or gamma  subunits. This change induces the activation of Hck kinase activity, which results in the tyrosine phosphorylation of the ARHI motif of Fcgamma RIgamma and Raf-1. Phosphorylation of Fcgamma RIgamma recruits the binding and activation of Syk kinase. The nonreceptor kinases, Syk and Hck, may phosphorylate critical substrates including Raf-1, MAP kinase, Shc, etc. The activation of small GTPases in the cell is mediated through the action of nucleotide exchange proteins, the Shc-Grb2-SOS complex, which convert GDPras to GTPras. GTPras activates downstream cascades including Raf-1 and MAP kinase. Other GTPases, Rap1a and Rac2, regulate as yet undefined effectors of signal relay driving the assembly of the respiratory burst proteins, p47phox, p67phox, gp91phox, and p22phox, which results in production of superoxide anions.

Fcgamma RI (CD64) is a 72-kDa integral membrane glycoprotein composed of three Ig-like extracellular domains, a single 21-amino acid transmembrane domain, and a 61-amino acid intracytoplasmic domain (19). Recent studies have demonstrated that Fcgamma RI signal transduction is mediated through multisubunit complex consisting of the ligand binding receptor molecule in association with a gamma -chain homodimer (52), which contains a YXXL amino acid motif termed the ITAM (22). The gamma  subunit of the Fcgamma RI and Fcepsilon RI, as well as zeta  subunit of TCR/CD3, contain ITAM sequences (53). The Fcgamma RI, Fcepsilon RI, and Fcgamma RIII associate with the gamma -chain for the stable transport and assembly of the receptors in the plasma membrane. The signaling pathway through the ITAM involves the activation of the Src family and the Syk/Zap70 family kinases (1, 33, 54). The gamma -chain is rapidly phosphorylated upon Fcgamma RI activation on serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues and is associated with Syk (31, 55). In our study, the specificity of Raf-1 tyrosine phosphorylation upon Fcgamma RI activation in U937IF cells was investigated by activating different Fcgamma R receptors (i.e. Fcgamma RII or Fcgamma RIII) and by stimulation with other agonists such as PMA, FMLP, calcium ionophore, or thrombin. We found that tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 is specifically induced upon Fcgamma RI cross-linking (Fig. 4). Importantly, we have generated similar data for Raf-1 tyrosine phosphorylation following Fcgamma RI cross-linking in human bone marrow derived primary macrophage (data not shown). Our results are novel in that they represent the first evidence implicating Raf-1 in Fc receptor signaling. The data are consistent with other results reported by Gupta et al. (56) showing the another ITAM-linked multisubunit receptors, TCR and BCR, signaling through the activation of Ras and Raf-1. Previously, Morrison et al. demonstrated that PMA enhances the serine/threonine activity, thereby increasing the catalytic activity of Raf-1 (57). It is interesting to speculate that the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 may be sequentially linked to signals mediated through phosphorylation of gamma -chain, Hck, or Syk in this system. In this model, Raf-1 may be a substrate for Hck, Syk, or other tyrosine kinases. In support of such a model in preliminary experiments, we have observed a physical interaction between Hck and Raf-1.2

Additional lines of evidence in this report support a potential role for Raf-1 in Fcgamma RI signal transduction. We have observed that Fcgamma RI stimulation induced the tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc. A mobility shift occurs in MAP kinase after Fcgamma RI cross-linking in U937IF cells (Fig. 5, lanes 7-10). The Shc-Grb2 complex is known to activate Ras. Raf-1 is a downstream effector of Ras and is known to activate MEK and MAP kinase (1). Alternatively, Raf-1 can be activated through Ras-dependent or -independent mechanisms (2). Ras-GTP, which is positively regulated by Grb2-SOS complex, activates Raf-1 through direct physical interaction (58). The adaptor protein, Shc, is thought to be involved in signaling from cytoplasmic tyrosine kinases through Grb2 and SOS. Ravichandran et al. (59) have demonstrated that Shc is tyrosine-phosphorylated and associated with the zeta -chain of the TCR upon T cell receptor activation. Other laboratories have reported that the heterologous expression of the Shc-SH2 domain in T cells blocks TCR signaling, suggesting that Shc plays an important role in TCR functions (60).

We found that Shc is phosphorylated and associated with Grb2 upon Fcgamma RI stimulation (Fig. 5A, lanes 8 and 9). Tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc increased the binding of Grb2 to Shc in our system (Fig. 5B, lane 8). It is well known that tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc is linked to the activation of Ras. Recent studies have shown that the tyrosine phosphorylation of Shc induces its interaction with Grb2, which is essential for binding of nucleotide exchange protein SOS and Ras activation (15, 61). In other experiments, we observed Shc is physically associated with gamma -chain of Fcgamma RI receptor in U937IF cells.2 Our data support the notion that tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 connects the Fcgamma RI signaling pathway sequentially through gamma -chain, Shc, Grb2-SOS, and possibly Ras. Recent data suggest a direct connection between Ras and Rac in several signaling pathways (62). These observations suggest a mechanism by which the conversion of GDPras to GTPras could lead to the formation of GTPrac, known to be required for the assembly of the respiratory burst response in myeloid cells. Hence we hypothesize that GTPrac needed to assemble the respiratory burst comes from the activation of Ras.

MAP kinases are located downstream of Raf-1 kinase. MAP kinases have been implicated in signaling pathway of many hematopoietic receptors, such as TCR, BCR, Fcepsilon RI, and Fcgamma RI receptors (63, 64). We show that Fcgamma RI cross-linking induces a mobility shift of MAP kinase, suggesting that MAP kinase is phosphorylated upon Fcgamma RI activation (Fig. 6). Both Fcgamma RI specific antibodies, mAb 197 and mAb 32.2, induce a mobility shift in MAP kinase. The mobility shift induced by mAb 197 stimulation is more rapid than that of mAb 32.2 (Fig. 6, lanes 7-9). PMA also induces a MAP kinase mobility shift (Fig. 6, lane 2). Stimulation of Fcgamma RIII does not induce this response and failed to induce the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1. Our data suggest that Erk2 is phosphorylated, as manifested by a retarded mobility on SDS-PAGE. Experiments are ongoing to determined if a direct relationship exists between the tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 and activation of Raf-1 kinase and MAP kinase.

Our data also demonstrate that Raf-1 is tyrosine-phosphorylated upon Fcgamma RI stimulation. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1 is correlated with phosphorylation of Shc, which associates with Grb2 in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent manner. Based on these results, we propose a model for Fcgamma RI signal transduction that involves tyrosine phosphorylation of Raf-1. This model predicts the sequential activation of Fcgamma RIalpha , Fcgamma RIgamma , Hck, Syk, Shc/Grb2/Sos, Ras, and Raf-1 and the activation of MEK and MAP kinases (29, 31, 32, 33, 61) (see Scheme I above).


Scheme I.

The further study of the role of Raf-1 tyrosine phosphorylation and its interaction with other components in Fcgamma RI signaling may clarify the molecular mechanisms that connect upstream cell surface receptors and their associated nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinases to the downstream activation of serine/threonine kinase cascades. The elucidation of these signaling pathways in macrophages will contribute to our understanding of the role of Raf-1 in post-mitotic cell functions, including macrophage activation leading to the activation of the respiratory burst.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by a grant to the Neil Bogart Memorial Laboratories by the T. J. Martell Foundation for Leukemia, Cancer and AIDS Research, by a CHLA Carrier Development Fellowship, and by Institutional Research Grant 21-34-04 from the American Cancer Society. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   Visiting professor from Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Korea.
   To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, 4650 Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90027. E-mail: ddurden% smtpgate{at}chlais.usc.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: IL, interleukin; Fcgamma RIalpha , alpha  subunit of Fcgamma RI; FcR, Fc receptor; TCR, T cell receptor; BCR, B cell receptor; HBSS, Hanks' balanced salt solution; PMA, phorbol myristic acid; FMLP, N-formyl-Met-Leu-Phe; Fcgamma R, Fc receptor for IgG; Fcgamma RI, high affinity Fc receptor for IgG; Fcepsilon RI, high affinity Fc receptor for IgE; IP, immunoprecipitate; IFNgamma , interferon gamma ; mAb, monoclonal antibody; Ralpha M, rabbit anti-mouse; CR, conserved region; MAP, mitogen-activated protein; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; ITAM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based motif; MEK, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase.
2   R. K. Park, Y. Liu, and D. L. Durden, unpublished results.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jonathan A. Cooper for providing the anti-MAP antisera and helpful discussion and Genentech Corp. for providing the human recombinant IFN-gamma used in these experiments.


REFERENCES

  1. Pawson, T. (1995) Nature 373, 573-580 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Morrison, D. K., Kaplan, D. R., Rapp, U. R., Roberts, T. M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 8855-8859
  3. Morrison, D. K., Kaplan, D. R., Escobedo, J. A., Rapp, U. R., Roberts, T. M., Williams, L. T. (1994) Cell 58, 649-657
  4. Kovacina, K. S., Yonezawa, K., Brautigan, D. L., Tonks, N. K., Rapp, U. R., Roth, R. A. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 12115-12118 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Morrison, D. K. (1994) Cancer Cells 2, 377-382
  6. Morrison, D. K., Heidecker, G., Rapp, U. R., Copeland, T. D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 17309-17316 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Jing, Y., Ohizumi, H., Kawazoe, N., Hashimoto, S., Masuda, S., Nakajo, S., Yoshida, T., Kuroiwa, Y., Nakaya, K. (1994) Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 85, 645-651 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Turner, B., Rapp, U. R., App, H., Greene, M., Dobashi, K., Reed, J. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 1227-1231 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Fabian, J. R., Daar, O. I., Morrison, D. K. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 7170-7179 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Pulmiglia, K., Chow, Y. H., Fabien, J. R., Morrison, D. K., Decker, S., Jove, R. (1995) Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 398-406 [Abstract]
  11. Vojtek, A. B., Hollenberg, S. M., Cooper, J. A. (1994) Cell 74, 205-214
  12. Heidecker, G., Kolch, W., Morrison, D. K., Rapp, U. R. (1992) Adv. Cancer Res. 58, 53-73 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Heidecker, G., Huleihel, M., Cleveland, J. M., Kolch, W., Beck, T. W., Lloyd, P., Pawson, T., Rapp, U. R. (1990) Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 2503-2512 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Stanton, V. P., Jr., Nichols, D. W., Laudano, A. P., Cooper, G. M. (1989) Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 639-647 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Buday, L., Downward, J. (1993) Cell 73, 611-620 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Roberts, T. M. (1994) Nature 360, 534-535
  17. Fridman, M., Tikoo, A., Varga, M., Murphy, A., Nur-E-Kamal, M. S. A., Maruta, H. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 30105-30108 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ravetch, J. V., Kinet, J. P. (1991) Annu. Rev. Immunol. 9, 457-492 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Kinet, J. P. (1992) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 4, 43-48 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Looney, R. J., Abraham, G. N., Anderson, C. L. (1986) J. Immunol. 136, 1641-1647 [Abstract]
  21. Anderson, C. L. (1982) J. Exp. Med. 156, 1794-1806 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Cambier, J. C. (1995) Immunol. Today 16, 110-117 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Cambier, J. C. (1995) J. Immunol. 155, 3281-3285 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Pfefferkorn, L. C., van de Winkel, J. G., Swink, S. L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 8164-8171 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Freeman, J. L., Kreck, M. L., Uhlinger, D. J., Lambeth, J. D. (1994) Biochemistry 33, 13431-13435 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Prigmore, E., Ahmed, S., Best, A., Kozma, R., Manser, E., Segal, A. W., Lim, L. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 10717-10722 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Huang, M. M., Indik, Z., Brass, L. F., Hoxie, J. A., Schreiber, A. D., Brugge, J. S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 5467-5473 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Liao, F., Shin, H. S., Rhee, S. G. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 3659-3663 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Cassatella, M. A., Anegon, I., Cuturi, M. C., Griskey, P., Trinchieri, G., Perussia, B. (1989) J. Exp. Med. 169, 549-567 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Anegon, I., Cuturi, M. C., Trinchieri, G., Perussia, B. (1988) J. Exp. Med. 167, 452-472 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Durden, D. L., Rosen, H., Cooper, J. A. (1994) Biochem. J. 299, 569-577
  32. Durden, D. L., Liu, Y. B. (1994) Blood 84, 2102-2108 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Durden, D. L., Kim, H. M., Calore, B., Liu, Y. B. (1995) J. Immunol. 154, 4039-4047 [Abstract]
  34. Posada, J., Cooper, J. A. (1992) Science 255, 212-215 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Roberts, P. J., Devalia, V., Faint, R., Pizzey, A., Bainton, A. L., Thomas, N. S., Pilkington, G. R., Linch, D. C. (1991) J. Immunol. 147, 3104-3115 [Abstract]
  36. Kazlauskas, A., Durden, D. L., Cooper, J. A. (1991) Cell Regul. 2, 413-425 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Dent, P., Sturgill, T. W. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 9544-9548 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Li, S., Janosch, P., Tanji, M., Rosenfeld, J. C., Waymire, J. C., Mischak, H., Kolch, W., Sedivy, J. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 685-696 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Heidecker, G., Kolch, W., Morrison, D. K., Raff, U. R. (1992) Adv. Cancer Res. 58, 53-73
  40. Moodie, S. A., Willumsen, B. M., Weber, M. J., Wolfman, A. (1994) Science 260, 1658-1661
  41. van Aelst, L., Barr, M., Marcus, S., Polverino, A., Wigler, M. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6213-6217 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Williams, K., Ulvestad, E., Antel, J. P. (1995) Eur. J. Immunol. 24, 3031-3037
  43. Fabian, J. R., Vojtek, A. B., Cooper, J. A., Morrison, D. A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 5982-5986 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Carroll, M. P., Clark-Lewis, I., Rapp, U. R., May, W. S. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 19812-19817 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Abo, A., Boyhan, A., West, I., Thrasher, A. J., Segal, A. W. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16767-16770 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Heyworth, P. G., Knaus, U. G., Xu, X., Uhlinger, D. J., Conroy, L., Bokoch, G. M., Curnutte, J. T. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 4, 261-269
  47. Gabig, T. G., Crean, C. D., Mantel, P. L., Rosli, R. (1995) Blood 85, 804-811 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Bokoch, G. M., Knaus, U. G. (1991) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6, 98-105
  49. Bokoch, G. M., Quilliam, L. A., Bohl, M., de Klein, A., Weening, R. S., Roos, D. (1991) Science 254, 1794-1796 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Dusi, S., Donini, M., Rossi, F. (1995) Biochem. J. 304, 243-250
  51. Benna, J., Ruedi, J. M., Babior, B. M. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 6729-6734 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Ernst, L. K., Duchemin, A. M., Anderson, C. L. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 90, 6023-6027 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Cambier, J. C. (1992) Curr. Opin. Immunol. 4, 257-264 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  54. Bolen, J. B. (1993) Oncogene 8, 2025-2031 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  55. Paolini, R., Jouvin, M. H., Kinet, J. P. (1991) Nature 353, 855-858 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Gupta, S., Weiss, A., Kumar, G., Wang, S., Nel, A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17349-17357 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Morrison, D. K., Browning, P. J., White, M. F., Roberts, T. M. (1988) Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 176-185 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Salcini, A. E., McGlade, J., Pelicci, G., Nicoletti, I., Pawson, T., Pelicci, P. G. (1995) Oncogene 9, 2827-2836
  59. Ravichandran, K. S., Lee, K. K., Songyang, Z., Cantley, L. C., Burn, P., Burakoff, S. J. (1993) Science 262, 902-905 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Baldari, C. T., Pelicci, G., Disomma, M. M., Milia, E., Giuli, S., Pelicci, P. G., Telford, J. L. (1995) Oncogene 10, 1141-1147 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Rozakis, A. M., McGlade, J., Mbamalu, G., Pelicci, G., Daly, R., Li, W., Batzer, S., Thomas, S., Brugge, J., Pelicci, P. G. (1992) Nature 360, 689-692 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Lai, C. C., Boguski, M., Broek, D., Powers, S. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 1345-1352 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Fukamachi, H., Takei, M., Kawakami, T. (1993) Int. Arch. Allergy Appl. Immunol. 102, 15-25
  64. Nel, A. E., Pollack, S., Landreth, G., Ledbetter, J. A., Hultin, L., Williams, K., Katz, R., Akerley, B. (1990) J. Immunol. 145, 971-979 [Abstract]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
F. Finetti, M. Pellegrini, C. Ulivieri, M. T. Savino, E. Paccagnini, C. Ginanneschi, L. Lanfrancone, P. G. Pelicci, and C. T. Baldari
The proapoptotic and antimitogenic protein p66SHC acts as a negative regulator of lymphocyte activation and autoimmunity
Blood, May 15, 2008; 111(10): 5017 - 5027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
A. M. Kant, P. De, X. Peng, T. Yi, D. J. Rawlings, J. S. Kim, and D. L. Durden
SHP-1 regulates Fcgamma receptor-mediated phagocytosis and the activation of RAC
Blood, August 13, 2002; 100(5): 1852 - 1859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. S. Kim, X. Peng, P. K. De, R. L. Geahlen, and D. L. Durden
PTEN controls immunoreceptor (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif) signaling and the activation of Rac
Blood, January 15, 2002; 99(2): 694 - 697.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
Y. Takai, T. Sasaki, and T. Matozaki
Small GTP-Binding Proteins
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2001; 81(1): 153 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
I. Hazan-Halevy, R. Seger, and R. Levy
The Requirement of Both Extracellular Regulated Kinase and p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase for Stimulation of Cytosolic Phospholipase A2 Activity by Either Fcgamma RIIA or Fcgamma RIIIB in Human Neutrophils. A POSSIBLE ROLE FOR Pyk2 BUT NOT FOR THE Grb2-Sos-Shc COMPLEX
J. Biol. Chem., April 21, 2000; 275(17): 12416 - 12423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R.-K. Park, A. Erdreich-Epstein, M. Liu, K. D. Izadi, and D. L. Durden
High Affinity IgG Receptor Activation of Src Family Kinases Is Required for Modulation of the Shc-Grb2-Sos Complex and the Downstream Activation of the Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate (Reduced) Oxidase
J. Immunol., December 1, 1999; 163(11): 6023 - 6034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
R.-K. Park, K. D. Izadi, Y. M. Deo, and D. L. Durden
Role of Src in the Modulation of Multiple Adaptor Proteins in Fcalpha RI Oxidant Signaling
Blood, September 15, 1999; 94(6): 2112 - 2120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. Xia, R. S. Lee, R. P. Narsimhan, N. K. Mukhopadhyay, B. G. Neel, and T. M. Roberts
Tyrosine Phosphorylation of the Proto-Oncoprotein Raf-1 Is Regulated by Raf-1 Itself and the Phosphatase Cdc25A
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 1999; 19(7): 4819 - 4824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
Y. Huang, A. Jaffa, S. Koskinen, A. Takei, and M. F. Lopes-Virella
Oxidized LDL-Containing Immune Complexes Induce Fc Gamma Receptor I–Mediated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Activation in THP-1 Macrophages
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., July 1, 1999; 19(7): 1600 - 1607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J.-H. Lin, A. Makris, C. McMahon, S. E. Bear, C. Patriotis, V. R. Prasad, R. Brent, E. A. Golemis, and P. N. Tsichlis
The Ankyrin Repeat-containing Adaptor Protein Tvl-1 Is a Novel Substrate and Regulator of Raf-1
J. Biol. Chem., May 21, 1999; 274(21): 14706 - 14715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
D. J. Kusner, C. F. Hall, and S. Jackson
Fc{gamma} Receptor-Mediated Activation of Phospholipase D Regulates Macrophage Phagocytosis of IgG-Opsonized Particles
J. Immunol., February 15, 1999; 162(4): 2266 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
W. T. Kyono, R. de Jong, R. Kil Park, Y. Liu, N. Heisterkamp, J. Groffen, and D. L. Durden
Differential Interaction of Crkl with Cbl or C3G, Hef-1, and {gamma} Subunit Immunoreceptor Tyrosine-Based Activation Motif in Signaling of Myeloid High Affinity Fc Receptor for IgG (Fc{gamma}RI)
J. Immunol., November 15, 1998; 161(10): 5555 - 5563.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. L. Clements, S. E. Ross-Barta, L. T. Tygrett, T. J. Waldschmidt, and G. A. Koretzky
SLP-76 Expression Is Restricted to Hemopoietic Cells of Monocyte, Granulocyte, and T Lymphocyte Lineage and Is Regulated During T Cell Maturation and Activation
J. Immunol., October 15, 1998; 161(8): 3880 - 3889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Chu, Y. Liu, G. A. Koretzky, and D. L. Durden
SLP-76-Cbl-Grb2-Shc Interactions in Fcgamma RI Signaling
Blood, September 1, 1998; 92(5): 1697 - 1706.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
R. K. Park, W. T. Kyono, Y. Liu, and D. L. Durden
CBL-GRB2 Interaction in Myeloid Immunoreceptor Tyrosine Activation Motif Signaling
J. Immunol., May 15, 1998; 160(10): 5018 - 5027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Schmid-Alliana, L. Menou, S. Manie, H. Schmid-Antomarchi, M.-A. Millet, S. Giuriato, B. Ferrua, and B. Rossi
Microtubule Integrity Regulates Src-like and Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase Activities in Human Pro-monocytic Cells. IMPORTANCE FOR INTERLEUKIN-1 PRODUCTION
J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 1998; 273(6): 3394 - 3400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Durden, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, R. K.
Right arrow Articles by Durden, D. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement