Volume 271, Number 23,
Issue of June 7, 1996
pp. 13504-13514
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Tamoxifen Modulates Protein Kinase C via Oxidative Stress in
Estrogen Receptor-negative Breast Cancer Cells*
(Received for publication, October 11, 1995, and in revised form, March 22, 1996)
Usha
Gundimeda
,
Zhen-Hai
Chen
and
Rayudu
Gopalakrishna
From the Department of Cell and Neurobiology, School of Medicine,
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Nonsteroidal agent tamoxifen (Tam), a
therapeutic/chemopreventive agent for breast cancer, inhibits protein
kinase C (PKC), which is considered to be one of its extra-estrogen
receptor sites of action. This drug is required at higher (>100
µM) concentrations to inhibit PKC in the test tube,
whereas it is required at lower (1-10 µM) concentrations
to induce inhibition of cell growth in estrogen receptor-negative cell
types. To identify additional mechanisms of action of Tam on PKC and
cell growth, studies with MDA-MB-231, an estrogen receptor-negative
breast carcinoma cell type, have been carried out. Upon treatment with
5-20 µM Tam, a cytosol to membrane translocation of PKC
occurred within 30 min, which was then followed by a down-regulation of
the enzyme within 2 h. A transient generation of
Ca2+/lipid-independent activated form of PKC was observed
during this period. Rapidly growing cells require nearly 2-3-fold
lower concentrations (2-5 µM) of Tam than do confluent
cells to induce changes in PKC. Furthermore, phorbol ester binding
observed with intact cells also decreased in Tam-treated cells only
under the conditions PKC was inactivated. Unlike phorbol esters, Tam
did not directly support the membrane association of PKC. The release
of arachidonic acid correlated with the PKC membrane translocation.
Studies carried out with [3H]Tam revealed that Tam
partitioned into the membrane, and there was no appreciable covalent
association of [3H]Tam with cellular proteins within this
limited time period (2 h). Various antioxidants (vitamin E, vitamin C,
-carotene, catalase, and superoxide dismutase) inhibited all these
cellular effects of Tam. Moreover, vitamin E strikingly blocked
Tam-induced growth inhibition. To determine whether oxymetabolites of
Tam can affect PKC permanently, OH-Tam was tested with purified PKC. In
contrast to Tam, which reversibly inhibited PKC, OH-Tam permanently
inactivated the enzyme by modifying the catalytic domain at lower
concentrations. The vicinal thiols present within this domain were
found to be required to induce this inactivation. This effect was
partially blocked by various antioxidants. This is the first report
showing the role of oxidative stress in mediating the actions of Tam.
Taken together these results suggest that Tam, by initially
partitioning into the membranes, induces a generation of transmembrane
signals and an oxidative stress to elicit the membrane association of
PKC, followed by an irreversible activation, and subsequent
down-regulation of this enzyme, which, in part, may lead to cell growth
inhibition.
INTRODUCTION
Tamoxifen (Tam)1 is a synthetic
nonsteroidal anti-estrogen that is widely used for the chemotherapy of
breast cancer and is currently being evaluated for chemoprevention of
this disease (1, 2, 3). The antiproliferative actions of Tam and other
triphenylethylene derivatives at submicromolar concentrations in
estrogen-dependent breast carcinoma cells are believed to
be mediated by high affinity binding to the estrogen receptor (ER)
(4, 5, 6, 7, 8). The effects induced by submicromolar concentrations of Tam can
be overcome by a high concentration of estrogen (4, 5, 6, 7, 8). However, Tam
also inhibits growth of ER-negative cell lines at low (1-10
µM) concentrations, which is not overcome by estrogen
(8, 9, 10, 11). Furthermore, it inhibits growth of other cell types, which
have no ER, in some cases at nanomolar concentrations (11). The
mechanism of such ER-independent inhibition of tumor cell growth by Tam
is not clearly known. Binding to so-called anti-estrogen sites and the
inhibitions of calmodulin and protein kinase C (PKC) are considered to
be some known additional sites of action of Tam-related agents
(12, 13, 14, 15, 16).
Since PKC may play a crucial role in the signal transduction that
influences cell growth and transformation (17, 18), the observation of
the inhibition of PKC by Tam has gained considerable attention.
Purified PKC has been shown to be reversibly inhibited by Tam-related
agents in the test tube (15, 16). This inhibition seems to involve a
number of different mechanisms including binding of the drug to
phospholipids that are required for activation, binding to the
catalytic domain at ATP-binding site, and binding to the regulatory
domain (15, 16, 19, 20, 21). Moreover, the modes of action have been found
to be slightly different for individual types of triphenylethylene
anti-estrogens tested (22). The metabolites of Tam, 4-hydroxytamoxifen
(OH-Tam) and N-demethyltamoxifen, have also been shown to
inhibit PKC in a reversible manner (23). The inhibition of PKC in the
test tube requires higher concentrations of Tam (IC50 100 µM) (15), while the ER-independent cell growth inhibition
requires only 1-5 µM Tam. This raises the possibility
that Tam induces growth inhibition at this low concentrations by acting
on cellular targets other than PKC and/or by inducing other cellular
mechanism(s), which may complement its action at PKC.
We have been involved in studies of regulation of PKC by oxygen
radicals and thiol modifying agents (24, 25). Such studies also
facilitated understanding of the mechanisms of inactivation of PKC by
its commonly used inhibitors, calphostin C, hypericin, and
chelerythrine. These inhibitors induce an irreversible inactivation of
PKC either involving oxygen radical production or alkylating mechanisms
(24). PKC inhibitors are classified based on their site of action,
either related to regulatory or to catalytic domains. Based on the
mechanism of action, these inhibitors also can be classified as
reversible inhibitors or irreversible inactivators (24). However, in
order to identify irreversible inhibitors, it is not only necessary to
evaluate them using an isolated enzyme in the test tube, it is also
important to study them in intact cells. A reversible inhibitor in test
tube could become an irreversible inactivator after metabolic
activation. This is especially important for Tam, which is known to be
oxidatively metabolized in the cell and can form reactive
metabolites that can covalently bind to DNA and proteins
(26, 27, 28, 29).
Tamoxifen also has been shown to stimulate the
Ca2+/phospholipid-dependent PKC activity in test tube at
high concentrations of Ca2+ (30). Unlike in test tubes,
where Tam inhibited PKC-mediated phosphorylation of proteins, with
intact cells Tam did not inhibit phorbol ester-induced phosphorylation
of endogenous proteins, but instead by itself stimulated the
phosphorylation of some endogenous proteins (31). Recent studies have
shown that staurosporine, an inhibitor for PKC in a test tube, could
function as an activator of PKC in intact cells inducing the membrane
translocation of PKC (32, 33, 34). Staurosporine also induced a release of
arachidonic acid, which is a common effect induced by a variety of
structurally unrelated tumor promoters (32, 35). In fact, in the mouse
skin carcinogenesis model, staurosporine acts as a tumor promoter (32,
33). In this contest it is noteworthy that Tam acts as a
chemopreventive agent in mammary carcinogenesis, while it can also
induce uterine cancer in humans as well as liver cancer in rats (10,
36, 37, 38). Therefore, it is important to extend the studies of Tam to
intact cells to understand whether it directly or after metabolic
activation can influence PKC or the upstream signal transduction
mechanisms in a bimodel manner. However, to date, such studies have not
been carried out with Tam in intact cells.
In this report we show that Tam and other related agents at low (1-10
µM) concentrations can induce the membrane association of
PKC, the irreversible activation and the subsequent down-regulation of
the enzyme involving the generation of transmembrane signals, and
oxidative regulation in a ER-negative breast cancer cell line,
MBA-MB-231. Unlike Tam, which inhibits PKC in a reversible way, at
least one of its oxymetabolites, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (OH-Tam), can
induce an irreversible oxidative inactivation of the isolated kinase,
probably by interacting with the vicinal thiols present within the
catalytic domain.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
Tamoxifen (trans) citrate, catalase
from bovine liver, and superoxide dismutase from bovine liver were
obtained from Sigma. Vitamin E (D-
-tocopherol) and
-carotene were from Fluka.
[N-methyl-3H]Tamoxifen citrate
(specific activity 84 Ci/mmol) was from Amersham Corp.;
[20-3H]phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (specific activity 20 Ci/mmol), and myo-[2-3H]inositol (specific
activity 17.5 Ci/mmol) [5,6,8,9,11,12,14-3H]arachidonic
acid (specific activity 210 Ci/mmol) were from DuPont NEN;
[
-32P]ATP (specific activity 20 Ci/mmol),
[methyl-3H]thymidine (specific activity 20 Ci/mmol), and 45CaCl2 (specific activity 12 mCi/mg Ca) were from ICN. 4-Hydroxytamoxifen was a generous gift from
Besins Iscovesco Laboratories, Paris. Human breast carcinoma cell lines
were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection.
Rabbit brain PKC (a mixture of
,
, and
isoenzymes) was
purified as described previously (24). Unless otherwise mentioned,
unfractionated mixture of these Ca2+-dependent
isoenzymes of PKC was used for modification studies. In some cases
individual isoenzymes separated by hydroxylapatite (39) were used. The
catalytic and regulatory domains were separated after treating PKC with
a low (1 µg/ml) concentration of trypsin (19).
DEAE-Cellulose Chromatographic Isolation of PKC from Cells
Treated with Tam
Cells were grown in 100-mm Petri dishes in
minimal essential medium with Earl's salts (MEM) supplemented with 5%
fetal calf serum. Either subconfluent (25%) or confluent cells were
changed to fresh serum-free MEM and incubated with various
concentrations of Tam, OH-Tam, or control vehicle (ethanol) for the
indicated periods of time at 37 °C. Then the soluble and
detergent-solubilized membrane fractions were prepared from the treated
cells and subjected to DEAE-cellulose chromatography as described
previously (40). The Ca2+/phospholipid-stimulated PKC
activity (proform) was eluted using 0.1 M NaCl (peak A) and
the Ca2+/phospholipid-independent and the modified PKC
activity was eluted with 0.25 M NaCl (peak B).
PKC Assay
The assays of PKC as well as
cAMP-dependent protein kinase were carried out in 96-well
plates with fitted filtration discs made of Durapore membranes (40).
Briefly, PKC reaction samples containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.33 mM
CaCl2, 0.1 mM ATP, histone H1 (0.1 mg/ml), 0.04 µM leupeptin, and 25 µl of PKC sample in a total volume
of 125 µl were incubated at 30 °C for 5 min. PKC activity was
expressed as units, where 1 unit of enzyme transfers 1 nmol of
phosphate to histone H1/min at 30 °C. Since protein phosphatase 2A
activity was high in the peak B fraction, microcystin-LR (100 nM) was included during PKC assay to obtain a reliable
measure of histone H1 phosphotransferase activity in this fraction.
Phorbol Ester Binding with Isolated
PKC
[3H]Phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate (PDBu) was used as
a ligand for the determination of phorbol ester binding, using the
multiwell filtration approach (40). For optimal PDBu binding to
purified PKC, the conditions discussed in method 1, described
previously, were used (40). To determine the optimal PDBu binding to
PKC fraction that was isolated by DEAE-cellulose chromatography from
the crude cell extracts, the conditions standardized with the cytosolic
receptor (method 2) were used (40).
Phorbol Ester Binding in Intact Cells
Cells were grown in
35-mm Petri dishes. Sets of three Petri dishes were used for
determining specific and nonspecific bindings. The medium was changed
to a fresh MEM (no serum), and then the cells were treated with various
concentrations of Tam for a 2-h time period. Then 37.5 nM
[3H]PDBu (0.25 µCi) was added to the medium and cells
were further incubated for 45 min. For determining nonspecific binding
10 µM unlabeled PDBu was included with radiolabel. After
incubations, cells were washed four times with ice-cold saline and
lysed with 0.2 M NaOH, and the radioactivity present in the
cell extract was determined. The specific binding was calculated by
subtracting the nonspecific binding from the observed total
binding.
PKC Membrane Binding with Homogenates and Isolated
Membrane
Whether Tam or OH-Tam induce chelator-stable membrane
association of PKC in the homogenates or with isolated membrane using
purified PKC was determined using previously described procedures (41).
Briefly, crude cell homogenates were incubated with Tam or OH-Tam (10 µM) or PMA (100 nM) in the presence of 0.1 mM CaCl2 at room temperature for 10 min. Then
EGTA was added to the homogenate, and the membrane and cytosolic
fractions were separated to determine PKC activity associated with
these fractions. Similarly, experiments were conducted using the
isolated membrane and purified PKC.
Covalent Binding of Tam to Proteins in Intact
Cells
Subconfluent cells (10-15 × 106) were
incubated with 25 µM [3H]Tam (3.75 µCi)
for a 2-h period at 37 °C in a serum-free MEM to allow substantial
inactivation of PKC. Then, under these conditions, whether Tam
covalently bound to protein or not was determined. The cells treated
with [3H]Tam were washed four times with saline and then
scrapped into 10 ml of saline and collected by centrifugation at 2,000 × g for 5 min. The cell pellet was then lysed with 3 ml of
cold acetone by sonication, and then the protein was allowed to
precipitate by keeping it at
10 °C for 30 min. The precipitated
protein was collected by centrifugation. The protein pellet was washed
twice with each organic solvent, acetone, n-hexane, and
methanol. The washed protein pellet was suspended in SDS-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis sample buffer without mercaptocompounds and heated
at 100 °C for 3 min to solubilize the protein, and then the
radioactivity was counted. To determine a covalent binding of
[3H]Tam to PKC, the detergent-solubilized cell extract
was prepared from the cells treated with [3H]Tam and it
was subjected to the centrifuge column technique to remove free Tam.
The protein fraction was incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies
raised against PKC (mixture of
,
, and
) at 30 °C for
4 h, and then the antibody-PKC complex was isolated by incubation
with protein A-Sepharose, followed by centrifugation. From the
Sepharose beads, protein was extracted with SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis sample buffer and the radioactivity was counted.
Modification of Purified PKC with OH-Tam
Initially
mercaptocompounds present within the PKC preparation were removed by
using a PD-10 gel filtration column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.). The
column chromatography also facilitated the exchange of buffer in PKC
preparation to buffer consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.1 mM EGTA, 150 nM pepstatin, 1 µM leupeptin. PKC (approximately 1-1.5 units) was
incubated with various concentrations of Tam or OH-Tam in the presence
of 1 mM CaCl2 in a total volume of 0.5 ml for
10 min at 37 °C. Then 25 µl of bovine serum albumin solution (10 mg/ml) and 25 µl of 0.1 M EDTA in 50 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8, were added.2 Tam and other
low molecular weight compounds present in the treated PKC samples were
removed by subjecting them to the centrifuge column technique using
Sephadex G-50 (24). The used Sephadex G-50 columns were washed with 2 bed volumes of ethanol to remove the trapped Tam in the gel and then
equilibrated with buffer. This ethanol wash to remove Tam that retained
within the gel was required to reuse the column, which otherwise would
result in a low recovery of PKC from the column upon subsequent
reuse.
Arachidonic Acid Release
Cells were grown to subconfluence
or confluence in a regular medium in 96-well plates. The medium was
then replaced with MEM with 0.1% serum and [3H]
arachidonic acid, 0.5 µCi/ml medium, and the cells were incubated for
4 h at 37 °C. Then the cells were washed four times with MEM
medium. The labeled cells (four wells for each point) were incubated
with MEM supplemented with 0.1% serum along with various
concentrations of Tam. At the indicated periods of time, the medium was
transferred from the wells of the culture plate to appropriate wells in
a 96-well filtration plate fitted with Durapore membrane filtration
disks. Then the samples were filtered into an ordinary 96-well plate by
using a minivacuum manifold (Millipore). The filters removed any
radiolabeled cells that were detached during the incubation of the
cells. The radioactivity present in the filtrates was then counted.
45Ca Uptake
Initially, MDA-MB-231 cells were
grown to confluence in 96-well plates. The serum-containing medium was
removed. Then serum-free MEM containing 45CaCl2
(2.5 µCi/ml) along with various concentrations of Tam was added to
the wells, and the cells were incubated at 37 °C. At various time
intervals, the medium was quickly removed and then the cells were
washed three times with 150 µl of MEM containing 1 mM
LaCl3. Then the cells were lysed with 0.2 M
NaOH, and the radioactivity retained within the cell was counted.
Inositol Phospholipid Hydrolysis
Cells were grown in 35-mm
Petri dishes and labeled overnight with
myo-[2-3H]inositol (10 µCi/ml) in a
inositol-free MEM supplemented with dialyzed FCS (5%). Cells were
washed and treated with various concentrations of Tam for given periods
of time in a serum-free MEM supplemented with 10 mM LiCl.
The treated cells were then washed and extracted with perchloric acid.
From the neutralized perchloric acid extracts, inositol phosphates were
separated by ion-exchange chromatography using Dowex-1 (42).
Growth Inhibition Assays
The size of the intracellular
thymidine pool was shown to be reduced by Tam, which can cause
artifacts in thymidine incorporation into the cell (43). Therefore, two
approaches were used to measure the cell growth rate. Cells were seeded
in 96-well multiwell plate to 25% confluence in MEM supplemented with
5% FCS. After allowing the cells to attach, various concentrations of
Tam were added (four wells for each point) and the cells were incubated
for 48 h at 37 °C. Then, from one set of multiwell plates, the
medium was removed and the cells were incubated with MEM supplemented
with 5% dialyzed FCS and 0.5 µCi/ml
[methyl-3H]thymidine. After 6 h of
incubation, the cells were washed four times with saline and lysed with
0.2 M NaOH and the radioactivity retained in the cells was
counted. Alternatively, cells treated with Tam in another set of
multiwell plates were stained with sulforhodamine B, and the absorbance
was measured at 550 nm using Thermomax multiwell plate reader as a
growth index (44).
RESULTS
Membrane Association and Down-regulation of PKC Induced by Tam and
OH-Tam
An ER-negative cell line, MDA-MB-231, was employed to
understand ER-independent effects of Tam-related agents on PKC. The
changes that occurred with the treatment of Tam and OH-Tam were
compared with that of tumor promoter, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate
(PMA). In confluent cells treated in a serum-free medium with 20 µM Tam or OH-Tam, there was a substantial decrease in the
activity of PKC in the cytosol fraction within 30 min (Fig.
1). A concomitant increase in the activity of PKC in the
membrane fraction was found. With Tam treatment, the extent of membrane
translocation of PKC was not appreciable up to 15 min. However,
PMA-induced membrane association of PKC occurred within 15 min. In
another experiment carried out with treatments for limited time (2 and
5 min), only PMA induced PKC translocation within these short periods
of time but not Tam and OH-Tam. Thus, there was a lag period of nearly
15 min in inducing the membrane translocation of PKC by Tam. A
prolonged treatment by both Tam and OH-Tam induced a pronounced
decrease in PKC activity in both cytosol and membrane. In the
PMA-treated cells, however, there was no decrease in total (cytosol + membrane) PKC activity during this 2-h time period. Nevertheless, by
extending the PMA treatment to 6 h, there was a substantial (85%)
decrease in the total PKC activity. The extent of membrane
translocation of PKC induced by OH-Tam was slightly lower than that
observed with Tam. This might be due to a rapid onset of
down-regulation of PKC induced by OH-Tam. Moreover, in all these cases
PKC-associated [3H]PDBu binding present within the peak A
fraction eluted from DEAE-cellulose showed a similar pattern of changes
in the cytosol and membrane (data not shown), suggesting that a true
physical redistribution of PKC and inactivation might have occurred.
There was no change in the activity of cAMP-dependent
protein kinase isolated from these Tam-treated cells.
Fig. 1.
Time course of membrane association of PKC in
MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells treated with Tam, OH-Tam, or
PMA. Confluent cells (approximately 20 × 106) were
treated with 20 µM Tam or OH-Tam in a serum-free medium
for the indicated time periods. A treatment with PMA (100 nM) alone was carried out for comparison. PKC activity
present in the cytosol fraction (A) and
detergent-solubilized membrane fraction (B) was determined.
PKC activity is expressed in units corresponding to a cytosolic
fraction containing 1 mg of protein and a membrane fraction
proportionate to the cytosolic fraction.
Generation of a Ca2+/Lipid-independent Activated Form
of PKC
Because PMA as well as various oxidants (hydrogen
peroxide, m-periodate, and polyphenolic agents) induce a
transient formation of a Ca2+/phospholipid-independent
activated form of PKC prior to an induction of appreciable
down-regulation of the enzyme (24, 25), we have determined whether such
an activated form was also formed during the treatment with Tam. In
confluent MDA-MB-231 cells treated with Tam (20 µM),
there was a decrease in
Ca2+/phospholipid-dependent PKC activity that
eluted with 0.1 M NaCl (peak A) within 1 h of Tam
treatment (Fig. 2). Concomitantly, the modified form
exhibiting a lesser dependence on Ca2+/phospholipid (peak
B) increased. This peak B activity eventually declined at a later time
period (2 h). The Ca2+/phospholipid-independent histone
phosphotransferase activity that transiently elevated in the peak B was
also inhibited by the pseudosubstrate peptide (PKC residues
19-31).
Fig. 2.
DEAE-cellulose chromatography of native and
modified forms of PKC isolated from the control and Tam-treated
MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells. PKC activity profile from
control untreated cells (A), Tam (20 µM)
treated for 1 h (B), and Tam (20 µM)
treated for 2 h (C). Confluent MDA-MB-231 cells were
treated with Tam. The detergent-solubilized cell extract containing
total PKC (cytosol and membrane) was applied to a small (0.5 ml)
DEAE-cellulose column (DE-52). The bound PKC (active form) was eluted
with 0.1 M NaCl (peak A), whereas the modified
form exhibiting less dependence on Ca2+/lipids was eluted
with 0.25 M NaCl (peak B). Fractions of 0.25 ml
were collected and the PKC activity present in these fractions was
measured in the presence of Ca2+ and lipids (
) or 1 mM EGTA (
).
Cell Growth Rate and Susceptibility to Tam-induced Changes in
PKC
Given the fact that cell growth inhibition occurs at
concentrations (5-10 µM) lower than that of the
concentrations required to inactivate PKC in confluent cells within a
2-h period, it is possible that PKC inactivation by Tam may be more
sensitive in rapidly growing subconfluent cells than that in confluent
cells. Since the membrane-associated PKC activity was high in
subconfluent cells, the extent Tam-induced cytosol-to-membrane
translocation of PKC was less. However, subconfluent cells were
2-3-fold more sensitive to down-regulation by Tam than were confluent
cells (data not shown). For example, in order to induce a 50%
down-regulation of PKC, Tam was required at 15 µM with
confluent cells, while it required only 5 µM with
subconfluent cells. Since membrane association of PKC was high in the
rapidly growing cells, it is possible that prior membrane association
of PKC might have enhanced subsequent down-regulation of PKC at a lower
concentration of Tam. Alternatively, it is possible that the metabolic
activation of Tam may be higher in the rapidly growing cells to
accelerate the process of inactivation of PKC.
PMA-induced Membrane Association of PKC Promoted Its Inactivation
by Tam
To determine whether prior membrane association of PKC
enhances the rate of the down-regulation of PKC by Tam, PMA was used to
induce an initial membrane translocation of PKC. Since PMA by itself
can induce the down-regulation of PKC with a prolonged treatment, the
pretreatment with PMA was restricted to a limited time just enough to
induce only the membrane association of PKC but not its
down-regulation. When confluent cells were treated with Tam (20 µM) alone, there was only a 22% decrease in the total
(cytosol + membrane) PKC activity within a 1-h time period (Fig.
3). However, Tam, when coadministered with PMA,
inactivated PKC by 64% within this time. This suggested that PMA can
enhance Tam-induced inactivation of PKC by facilitating the initial
membrane association of PKC.
Fig. 3.
Effect of PMA pretreatment on the Tam-induced
inactivation of PKC in MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells. Three
sets of confluent MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells were treated with
PMA (100 nM), Tam (20 µM), or a combination
of PMA and Tam for the indicated periods of time. Total PKC (cytosol
and membrane) was then extracted from the treated cells with a buffer
containing detergent, and PKC activity was determined.
Indirect Action of Tam on PKC Translocation
Previous studies
carried out by this laboratory have shown that PMA could induce a
chelator-stable membrane association of PKC by directly binding to
PKC-lipid complex (41). To determine whether Tam or other related
agents could induce chelator-stable membrane association of PKC in a
manner similar to phorbol esters, experiments were carried out using
crude cell homogenates and isolated membrane incubated with purified
PKC. Only PMA in the presence of Ca2+ produced the
chelator-stable membrane association of PKC, while Tam and other
related agents failed to promote the membrane binding of PKC either in
the crude homogenates or with the isolated membranes.
Decrease in PDBu Binding in Intact Cells in Relation to
Irreversible Inactivation of PKC
The phorbol ester binding
determined with intact cells represents the state of PKC within the
cells. Therefore, we have determined [3H]PDBu binding in
cells treated with Tam. In cells treated with Tam, there was a decrease
in PDBu binding correlating with inactivation of PKC under these
conditions (Fig. 4). In a previous study, a decrease in
[3H]PDBu binding in intact cells was observed with Tam
concentrations that were far lower than that required to inhibit
purified PKC (15). It was assumed that the inhibition of PDBu binding
occurred directly by Tam in a manner similar to PKC inhibition that
occurred in the test tube. However, with isolated PKC, the PDBu binding
was not affected by Tam (19). The current study suggested that the
observed inhibition of PDBu binding in other cell types tested reflects
an irreversible inactivation of PKC occurring at a lower concentration
of Tam in the cells rather than due to a direct interference of PDBu
binding by Tam.
Fig. 4.
Effect of various concentrations of Tam on
the [3H] PDBu binding in intact cells and its
comparison with loss of PKC activity under the same conditions.
MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells were grown to confluence in both
35-mm and 100-mm Petri dishes. Cells in both types of Petri dishes were
initially treated with various concentrations of Tam for 2-h time
period. From the cells grown in 35-mm Petri dishes, the specific
[3H]PDBu binding was determined as described under
``Materials and Methods.'' The cells in 100-mm Petri dishes were used
to determine the activity of total PKC (cytosol and membrane).
Second Messengers That Are Involved in Tam-induced Membrane
Association of PKC
Since Tam cannot promote a direct association
of PKC with the isolated membranes, and since the observed membrane
association of PKC in the Tam-treated cells occurred with a lag of
nearly 30 min, a generation of endogenous agents in response to Tam
treatment might have facilitated the membrane association of PKC. Given
the fact that second messengers such as Ca2+,
diacylglycerol, and arachidonic acid support membrane association of
PKC, we have determined 45Ca2+ uptake,
hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol, and arachidonic acid release in
Tam-treated cells. In MDA-MB-231 cells treated with Tam, there was no
increase in 45Ca2+ uptake compared to control
cells. Similarly, the hydrolysis of inositol phospholipids was not
altered as measured by the radioactive label in inositol phosphates.
However, in cells treated with Tam, there was a substantial increase in
the release of [3H]arachidonic acid from the cells
prelabeled with [3H]arachidonic acid (Fig.
5).
Fig. 5.
Tam-induced release of
[3H]arachidonic acid from the radiolabeled MDA-MB-231
cells. Confluent MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells in a 96-well
plate were labeled with [3H]arachidonic acid (0.5 µCi/ml) for 4 h at 37 °C. The radiolabeled cells were washed
and treated with various concentrations of Tam for indicated periods of
time. The released [3H]arachidonic acid into the medium
was counted after passing the medium through filters in a 96-well
filtration plate. The values represent mean and S.D. of quadruplicate
determinations.
Covalent Binding of [3H]Tam to PKC
Subconfluent
cells were incubated with 25 µM [3H]Tam
(3.75 µCi) for various periods of time (5-120 min) at 37 °C. The
cytosolic and membrane fractions were initially isolated from the cells
treated with [3H]Tam by centrifugation, and then acetone
was used to extract the membrane associated Tam. Approximately 6-9
nmol/106 cells (85-95% of the total radioactivity) was
recovered with acetone from the membrane fraction, while 0.2-1.1
nmol/106 cells (5-15% of the radioactivity) was recovered
in the cytosolic fraction (data not shown). This suggested that Tam may
initially partition into the membrane and then mediate its effects
leading to initial membrane association of PKC. The radioactivity
associated with the acetone-precipitated protein fraction was low
(0.05% of the total radioactivity that was retained in the cell).
Furthermore, there was no detectable amount of the radioactivity in the
immunoprecipitated PKC fraction from the crude cell homogenate. Since
the cell labeling with [3H]Tam was carried out for only
2 h, we cannot exclude the possibility of increased covalent
binding of [3H]Tam with PKC or other macromolecules with
prolonged incubation period. However, the covalent binding to PKC may
not necessarily be the sole mechanism for inactivation of PKC observed
in the cells treated with Tam for limited time (2 h).
Protection of Tam-induced Inactivation of PKC by
Antioxidants
Since Tam is known to go through oxidative
metabolism, it is possible that some oxymetabolites may produce
reactive oxygen species and affect PKC in an irreversible manner.
Formation of 4-monohydroxy-, 3,4-dihydroxy-, and N-oxide
metabolites have been previously reported (1). Therefore, we tested
both water-soluble and lipid-soluble antioxidants to block the
Tam-mediated inactivation of PKC in MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells.
Since the translocation was a transient process, to better evaluate the
antioxidant protective effects, the effect of these agents on the
down-regulation of total (cytosol + membrane) PKC activity was
determined initially. N-Acetylcysteine had no effect on the
rate of inactivation of PKC induced by Tam, whereas vitamin C, vitamin
E (D-
-tocopherol), and
-carotene all inhibited the
down-regulation of PKC (Fig. 6). Furthermore,
antioxidant enzymes, SOD, and catalase were partially effective in
preventing the Tam-induced inactivation of PKC in both cell types.
Conceivably, an oxidative process may be involved in the irreversible
inactivation of PKC occurring in the Tam-treated cells. Inhibition of
this process by different antioxidant systems suggests the formation of
different reactive oxygen species in the Tam-treated cells.
Fig. 6.
Effect of various antioxidants on the
Tam-induced inactivation of PKC in intact MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma
cells. Confluent MDA-MB-231 breast carcinoma cells were treated
with Tam (20 µM) for 2 h either alone or in
combination with one of the antioxidant. The following antioxidants
were used: NAC, N-acetylcysteine (1 mM); vit. C, vitamin C (1 mM);
vit. E, vitamin E (100 µM);
-car,
-carotene (100 µM); SOD (40 units/ml); catalase (1000 units/ml). PKC activity represents the total
(cytosol and membrane) extractable with detergent.
Whether antioxidants inhibited PKC translocation prior to blocking the
PKC down-regulation was studied using vitamin E, which produced the
best protective affect. Vitamin E decreased the extent of the
translocation of PKC occurring within a 30-min time period (data not
shown). Therefore, it is possible that vitamin E, by decreasing the
oxidative stress, prevented membrane association of PKC. Furthermore,
vitamin E also decreased arachidonic acid release from the cells (Fig.
7). There is a possibility that inhibition of
Tam-induced oxidative stress may prevent the subsequent activation of
phospholipases A2 and D, leading to a decrease in the
release of arachidonic acid from the membrane phospholipids. However,
we cannot exclude the possibility that vitamin E directly inhibited
phospholipase A2 activity as has been shown by others (45).
Fig. 7.
Effect of vitamin E and
-carotene on the
Tam-induced release of arachidonic acid from MDA-MB-231 breast
carcinoma cells. Cells were initially labeled with
[3H]arachidonic acid for 4 h and then stimulated
with Tam (20 µM) for 2 h either in the presence or
absence of vitamin E or
-carotene (100 µM).
Appropriate controls with either ethanol vehicle (control) or vitamin E
or
-carotene alone were set up. The values represent mean and S.D.
of quadruplicate determinations.
Since vitamin E inhibits several effects of Tam, whether vitamin E
inhibits the intake and retention of Tam in the cell was determined.
Even at higher concentrations (100 µM) of vitamin E
inhibited only 5-10% [3H]Tam retention within the cell
(data not shown). Such a small effect of vitamin E on Tam retention is
unlikely to be responsible for its dramatic effects on PKC and cell
growth.
Vitamin E Blocks Tam-induced Cell Growth Inhibition
Since
vitamin E blocks the Tam-mediated oxidative regulation of PKC, we have
determined whether vitamin E can block the Tam-induced growth
inhibition of the cells. Vitamin E alone had no growth inhibitory
effect on the cell growth. However, when coincubated with Tam, vitamin
E blocked nearly 80-90% of the Tam-induced cell growth inhibition
(Fig. 8). This strongly suggests that Tam-mediated
growth inhibition might have been mediated by oxidative stress
occurring in the membrane.
Fig. 8.
Effect of vitamin E on the Tam-induced growth
inhibition of MDA-MB-231 cells. The cells (75,000) were seeded in
35-mm Petri dishes. Three Petri dishes were used for each point. After
allowing the cells to attach to Petri dish, the cells were treated with
Tam (5 or 10 µM) either in the presence or absence of
vitamin E (100 µM). The cells were trypsinized at the
indicated time periods, and the single cell suspension was counted with
a Coulter cell counter. The values represent mean of three
determinations.
Irreversible Inactivation of Purified PKC by
4-Hydroxytamoxifen
Since Tam-induced inhibition of PKC activity
in test tube is totally reversible, the observed irreversible
inactivation of PKC occurred in intact cells treated with Tam was
unlikely to be caused by a direct action of unmodified drug. It is
possible that either the endogenous agents that are elevated in
response to Tam treatment or the metabolites of Tam might have induced
this irreversible inactivation of PKC. Among the oxymetabolites of Tam,
OH-Tam was extensively studied (1). Therefore, we determined whether or
not OH-Tam can induce an irreversible inactivation of purified PKC in
test tube. Rabbit brain PKC (a mixture of
,
, and
isoenzymes)
was incubated with either Tam or OH-Tam under defined conditions, and
after removing the drug from the treated PKC preparation, both kinase
activity and PDBu binding were determined. Thus, at a later step during
the determination of kinase activity and PDBu binding, the drug was no
longer present. When incubations were carried out in the presence of
0.1 mM EGTA, there was no decrease in either kinase
activity or PDBu binding. However, when 1 mM
CaCl2 was included in this incubation, OH-Tam inactivated
PKC activity with IC50 value of approximately 50 µM (Fig. 9). The loss of PDBu binding
occurred only at higher concentrations with IC50 of 90 µM. Tam did not induce this inactivation of the enzyme,
even at a higher (200 µM) concentration. PKC activity did
not recover by subjecting the OH-Tam treated PKC to extensive dialysis,
to DEAE-cellulose chromatography in the presence of Nonidet P-40, or to
hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Conceivably, the observed
decrease in PKC activity after OH-Tam treatment was due to an
irreversible modification of PKC. Under the same conditions, OH-Tam did
not inactivate purified cAMP-dependent protein kinase
(holoenzyme) either in the presence or absence of cAMP, even at a high
(100 µM) concentration.
Fig. 9.
Inactivation of purified PKC by Tam and
OH-Tam. Purified PKC (approximately 1.2 units) from rabbit brain
was incubated with indicated concentrations of Tam or OH-Tam along with
1 mM CaCl2 in a total volume of 0.5 ml for 10 min at 37 °C. Then 25 µl of bovine serum albumin (10 mg/ml) and 25 µl of 0.1 M EDTA in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8 were
added. Tam or OH-Tam was removed from the treated PKC sample by using
centrifuge column technique. Then, the treated PKC sample was used to
determine the residual kinase activity and PDBu binding without further
addition of Tam or OH-Tam.
The Ca2+ needed for this inactivation was above 50 µM and optimal at 0.8-1 mM in the absence of
other regulators (data not shown). In the presence of
phosphatidylserine and diolein, the concentrations of Ca2+
required to promote this inactivation were lower (Fig.
10). In contrast, PMA either in the presence or in the
absence of phosphatidylserine promoted this Tam-mediated inactivation
of PKC even in the absence of Ca2+ (Fig. 10). The
inactivation of PKC induced by OH-Tam was found to be temperature- and
time-dependent. The inactivation was very slow at 4 °C
and was rapid at 37 °C. This inactivation of PKC also occurred with
highly purified homogeneous preparations of PKC that lack any
peroxidase activity. Among the Ca2+-dependent
isoenzymes (
,
, and
) tested,
-isoenzyme was more sensitive
to the inactivation by OH-Tam with an IC50 of 30 µM (Fig. 11). In contrast,
and
isoenzymes were less sensitive to inactivation induced by OH-Tam and
the IC50 was approximately 120 µM.
Fig. 10.
Ca2+ requirement for
inactivation of purified PKC by OH-Tam. Purified PKC
(approximately 1.2 units) was incubated with OH-Tam (100 µM) for 10 min at 37 °C either in the presence of 1 mM EGTA or specified concentration of Ca2+. In
the absence of lipid cofactors or PMA, 1 mM
CaCl2 was used, while in the presence of diolein (0.8 µg/ml)/phosphatidylserine (1 µg/ml), PMA (100 nM)/phosphatidylserine, or PMA alone, 10 µM
CaCl2 was used. PKC activity remaining was determined after
removing the OH-Tam from the treated samples. Controls were set up with
either EGTA or Ca2+ and were used to calculate as the
percentage of inactivation induced by OH-Tam in the presence of various
regulators.
Fig. 11.
Differential susceptibility of purified
Ca2+-dependent isoenzymes of PKC to
irreversible inactivation induced by OH-Tam. PKC isoenzymes,
separated by hydroxylapatite chromatography,
(type III),
(type
II), and
(type I) and the unseparated mixture of all three
isoenzymes (approximately 1 unit) treated with the indicated
concentrations of OH-Tam as described in the legend to Fig. 9 and after
removing the OH-Tam the PKC activity was determined.
Identification of PKC Domain That Is Sensitive to
OH-Tam
Previous studies suggested that Tam-induced inhibition of
PKC caused by binding of Tam to both the catalytic and regulatory
domains (15, 16, 19, 20, 21). To identify the site that was irreversibly
affected by OH-Tam, the Ca2+/phospholipid-independent
activity of the enzyme using protamine sulfate, an indicator of the
catalytic domain function independent from the regulatory domain, was
determined. The protamine phosphotransferase activity was also lost
parallel to Ca2+/lipid-dependent histone H1
phosphotransferase activity. Furthermore, among the cofactors tested,
Mg2+ enhanced OH-Tam mediated inactivation, while
ATP/Mg2+ complex protected the enzyme from this
inactivation (Fig. 12). Protection was also observed
with H-7, an inhibitor that competitively binds at the ATP-binding site
on the enzyme. Furthermore, the catalytic domain (so-called M-kinase)
generated by trypsin digestion was also inactivated by OH-Tam with an
IC50 of 25 µM (Fig. 13). This
concentration was nearly 2-fold lower than that required with
holoenzyme. However, the regulatory domain generated by trypsin
digestion was inactivated by OH-Tam only at higher concentrations of
OH-Tam (IC50 > 200 µM). Unlike the catalytic
domain, the regulatory domain lost its sensitivity upon separation from
the catalytic domain by proteolysis.
Fig. 12.
Protection of OH-Tam-mediated inactivation
of PKC by various ligands that bind to PKC. Purified PKC
(approximately 1.2 units) incubated with OH-Tam (100 µM)
under the standard conditions described in the legend to Fig. 9. To
these standard conditions, one of the following ligands were added to
determine its protective effect. The concentrations of ligands tested
were Mg2+ (8 mM) and ATP (0.1 mM)
either alone or in combination, H-7 (100 µM), and histone
(0.1 mg/ml). The activity of PKC remained after OH-Tam treatment in the
presence of these agents was expressed as the percentage of the
activity observed with appropriate control set up with these ligands in
absence of OH-Tam.
Fig. 13.
Differential rate of inactivation of kinase
activity and phorbol ester binding of the PKC subjected to limited
proteolysis using trypsin. Proteolytically separated catalytic and
regulatory domains were treated with the indicated concentrations of
OH-Tam under the standard conditions. After removing the OH-Tam by
dialysis using Spectra/Por membrane (cut-off Mr
10,000), the residual protein kinase activity or PDBu bindings were
determined.
An attempt was made to determine whether OH-Tam binds to the same
site(s) where Tam also binds or if OH-Tam has its unique binding site.
The enzyme was incubated with OH-Tam (50 µM) at the
conditions that favor inactivation, and, in another set of samples,
OH-Tam was coincubated with a 4-fold excess of Tam to determine whether
or not Tam could block OH-Tam action. Nearly 50% of the PKC activity
was inactivated with OH-Tam alone, while with Tam coincubation, OH-Tam
inactivated only 18% of the kinase activity. This suggested that both
Tam and its metabolite OH-Tam would bind to the same site(s) on the
PKC. Tam induced a reversible effect on the enzyme, while OH-Tam
induced an irreversible modification of the enzyme leading to an
inactivation of the kinase.
To gain insight into the mechanism by which OH-Tam can affect PKC, we
have tested antioxidant systems to block inactivation of PKC induced by
OH-Tam. Mercapto agents, DTT (1 mM) or 2-mercaptoethanol
(10 mM), significantly decreased this inactivation when
they were present during incubation with OH-Tam (Fig.
14). However, once the enzyme was inactivated by
OH-Tam, these thiol agents did not reverse this modification. Vitamin
E, SOD, and catalase all partially blocked the inactivation of PKC
induced by OH-Tam. Heat-inactivated SOD and catalase had no protective
effect. This suggested that reactive oxygen species might have been
formed during the incubation of PKC with OH-Tam, which were scavenged
by these antioxidant systems. The protection offered by SOD and
catalase suggests the formation of superoxide and hydrogen peroxide.
The inhibition by vitamin E also suggests a possibility for generation
of phenoxyl radical from the phenolic compound.
Fig. 14.
Antioxidants protect PKC from inactivation
induced by OH-Tam. Purified PKC (approximately 1.2 units) was
treated with 100 µM OH-Tam under the standard conditions
to induce inactivation and various antioxidant systems were tested to
block this effect. Appropriate controls were set up by incubating PKC
with each of these antioxidants alone: DTT (1 mM), vitamin
E (100 µM), SOD (5 units), and catalase (200 units). The
PKC activity remained after incubation with OH-Tam in the presence of
these antioxidants was expressed as the percentage of the activity that
observed with the appropriate controls carried out with the antioxidant
in the absence of OH-Tam.
Importance of Vicinal Thiols in the Catalytic Domain to Sensitize
PKC for the Inactivation Induced by OH-Tam
Previous studies have
shown that phenoxyl radicals that formed from the phenolic compounds
could react with thiols to produce reactive oxygen species (46, 47). To
determine whether vicinal thiols present within the catalytic domain
could play a role in mediating the phenolic compound or phenoxyl
radical-mediated inactivation of PKC, the enzyme was initially treated
with a nitric oxide-generating agent, S-nitrosocysteine, to
mask the vicinal thiols by inducing the formation of disulfide bond(s)
and then treated with OH-Tam. The treatment with
S-nitrosocysteine resulted in a modification of the enzyme
with a loss of PKC activity, which was reversed by a treatment with 10 mM DTT (Fig. 15). In contrast, the
modification of PKC induced by OH-Tam was not reversed by DTT.
Nonetheless, the pretreatment with S-nitrosocysteine and
subsequent treatment with OH-Tam resulted in a lack of DTT-resistant
inactivation of PKC.3 This suggested that
masking the vicinal thiol groups present within the catalytic domain
was sufficient to prevent the irreversible inactivation of PKC induced
by OH-Tam.
Fig. 15.
Effect of modification of vicinal thiols
present within the PKC on the inactivation induced by OH-Tam. Two
sets of PKC (approximately 1.2 units) samples in the presence of 1 mM CaCl2 was pretreated with 200 µM S-nitrosocysteine (SNC) as a
nitric oxide donor for 5 min at 30 °C. Then
S-nitrosocysteine was removed by the centrifuge column
technique. To one set of treated samples, OH-Tam (100 µM)
along with 1 mM CaCl2 was added and the samples
were incubated for 10 min. Then the low molecular weight compounds
present in the treated PKC samples were removed by the centrifuge
column technique. Then the treated PKC samples were subdivided into two
aliquots, and to one aliquot DTT was added to 10 mM final
concentration. PKC activity present in the both aliquots (with or
without DTT) was determined.
DISCUSSION
Although higher (>100 µM) concentrations of Tam
were required to inhibit PKC in a reversible manner in the test tube,
with intact cells, it required substantially lower (5-20
µM) concentrations to induce an initial membrane
translocation, subsequent irreversible activation, and finally
irreversible inactivation of this enzyme. By initially partitioning in
the membrane, it is possible that Tam may inhibit PKC in a reversible
manner in intact cells at a lower concentration than that required in
the test tube. However, as suggested by these studies, additional
complementing mechanisms of action of Tam could induce a bidirectional
regulation of PKC with Tam at lower concentrations.
This is the first report showing the role of oxidative stress in
mediating the Tam effects on PKC as well as cell growth inhibition.
Initially, Tam-related agents by partitioning into the membrane may
induce local effects. The stabilization of the bilipid layer by Tam
similar to cholesterol has been suggested previously by others (48). A
decrease in membrane fluidity by Tam was shown previously (49). These
membrane effects of Tam may trigger transmembrane signal transduction
events and oxidative stress. This thesis was supported based on the
following four key observations in this study. First, there is a good
correlation with Tam-mediated effects on PKC and the release of
arachidonic acid. Second, all the early cellular effects of Tam
including the release of arachidonic acid, PKC translocation,
irreversible activation and down-regulation of PKC, and cell growth
inhibition were all inhibited by a variety of antioxidants. Third, the
Tam-induced inhibition of cell growth was blocked efficiently by
antioxidant vitamin E. Finally, a metabolite of Tam, OH-Tam, unlike the
parent drug, induced an irreversible inactivation of purified PKC,
which was partially prevented by various antioxidants.
The unique structural aspects of PKC may make it a suitable candidate
for bidirectional regulation induced by oxidants (24). A selective
oxidative modification of the regulatory domain of PKC results in a
generation of Ca2+/lipid-independent form of the enzyme,
while the modification of the catalytic domain leads to an inactivation
of the enzyme (24). The regulatory domain contains 12 cysteine
residues, which coordinate the binding of 4 zinc atoms (50), and the
zinc-thiolate structure is required for binding of phorbol ester and
diacylglycerol (51). This positively charged zinc-thiolate structure is
more susceptible to oxidative modification by anionic oxidants than
that of free thiolates present within the catalytic domain (24). Such
differences in the reactivity of the thiolates in PKC can lead to the
activation of the enzyme when the oxidants are generated at lower
concentrations, and an inactivation of the enzyme by a modification of
thiols in the catalytic site with an increase in the generation of
oxidants.
Oxidants have been shown to activate both phospholipases A2
and D, which can release directly or indirectly arachidonate from the
membrane phospholipids (52, 53). In a recent study, an activation of
phospholipase D by micromolar concentrations of Tam in intact cells was
reported (54). Several agents, such as nonphorbol tumor promoters,
staurosporine, thapsigargin, okadaic acid, and calyculin-A, that
promote the release of arachidonic acid have been shown to induce a
cytosol-to-membrane translocation of PKC (55, 56). Once PKC is
associated with the membrane, its susceptibility to oxidative
modification may be enhanced (24). A lack of inactivation of protein
kinase A under these conditions suggests certain specificity in the
effects of Tam on protein kinases in intact cells.
The metabolite OH-Tam is the major circulating species formed by the
hepatic biotransformation of Tam in rats (1). However, in humans,
OH-Tam is a minor metabolite, and it is not known whether it is formed
in sufficient concentrations in the Tam-treated cells in culture. Since
Tam is a reversible inhibitor of PKC in the test tube while it is an
irreversible inactivator in intact cells, the observed irreversible
inactivation of PKC in the test tube by OH-Tam suggests at least one of
the metabolites formed from Tam in the body is capable of irreversibly
inactivating PKC. Although we are sure that PKC inactivation in the
Tam-treated cells is initiated by an oxidative process, it is not clear
at present whether this inactivation process is mediated directly by a
metabolite formed from Tam or mediated by endogenous oxidants generated
in response to Tam action. In spite of the fact that OH-Tam was a
catalytic site-directed inactivator of PKC, it did not inactivate the
catalytic subunit of PKA, suggesting that certain specificity may exist
in the action of OH-Tam to affect limited protein kinases.
Multiple mechanisms leading to formation of oxidants may be involved in
mediating the inactivation of PKC induced by Tam in the cell or OH-Tam
in the test tube. One possibility is that an initial formation of
phenoxyl radical could react with vicinal thiols to produce reactive
oxygen species that can inactivate PKC (46, 47). The other possibility
is that autoxidation of certain phenolic agents such as hydroquinone
and catechol could produce superoxide and hydrogen peroxide through the
redox cycle process (57). Alternately, Tam may form a carbon-centered
radical and participate in inducing oxidative stress. Potential
formation of carbon-centered radicals from related agents such as
triphenylmethane was discussed before by others (30). Although in this
study, a prooxidant role of Tam or OH-Tam has been presented, previous
studies have suggested an antioxidant function for these agents (48).
It is possible that depending on the conditions, Tam or its
hydroxymetabolite could function as either prooxidant or antioxidant.
This is not an unusual situation, since several other phenolic agents
have previously been shown to influence oxidative processes in a
bimodel manner depending on the conditions (58, 59).
The pharmacological interest of estrogen-related agents had originally
began with the observation of estrogen-like effects produced by
stilbene and triphenylethylene. Although the role of redox regulation
and the formation of reactive oxygen species have been well documented
for a stilbene derivative, diethylstilbesterol (60), redox metabolism
was not studied for the metabolites of triphenylethylene derivative,
Tam. Similarly, it has been well established that the carcinogenic
effects of high concentrations of estradiol may involve a formation of
catechol estrogens and reactive oxygen species (61). The oxidants play
an important role in tumor promotion (62, 63, 64, 65). Furthermore, drugs such
as chloroquine induce retinopathy, which may involve its ability to
produce oxidative stress (66). Therefore, the oxidative stress induced
by Tam may have some role in producing its side effects, such as
increased incidences of uterine cancer and retinopathy in humans.
In ER-positive cell lines, Tam can elicit estrogen-reversible growth
inhibitory effects at a concentration range of 10-100 nM
(4, 5, 6, 7). However, at such a concentration range, Tam in ER-positive cell
line (MCF-7) growing in a regular serum-containing medium did not
affect PKC within a short period of time (2 h). It is difficult to
interpret the changes occurring in PKC after a prolonged treatment with
Tam at lower concentrations. In order to sensitize the ER-positive cell
lines to submicromolar concentrations of Tam, it is necessary to grow
these cells for a few days in a phenol red-free medium supplemented
with dextran-coated charcoal-treated serum. Therefore, further studies
in this direction are certainly needed. These studies do not exclude
the role for ER in the action of Tam in ER-positive cell lines. The
Tam-induced oxidative stress may complement the effects occurring
through ER. Both estrogen and Tam were reported to induce peroxidase
activity in target tissues such as uterus and mammary gland (67).
Phenol red is known to mimic certain actions of estrogen in breast
carcinoma cells in culture (68). This dye is also a good substrate for
peroxidase (69). Moreover, peroxidase has been recently shown to
activate Tam yielding covalent protein adducts (70).
Originally, it was thought that Tam inhibits growth of only ER-positive
cells. Subsequently it was shown to inhibit growth of other cell types
which lack ER (8, 9, 10). In a recent study, it was shown that A549 lung
carcinoma cells that lack ER were inhibited by Tam at nanomolar
concentrations (11). Furthermore, Tam inhibits growth of MCF-7 breast
carcinoma cells even in the absence of estrogen or phenol red in the
medium (6, 9). Breast carcinoma in humans that initially responded to
Tam therapy, subsequently develops a resistance to this drug (10). From
Tam-sensitive MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells, Tam-resistant sublines were
cloned (71). The presence of ER in the breast carcinoma cells that are
resistant to Tam (71) suggests that ER alone is not sufficient to
mediate Tam-induced growth inhibitory effects, and it could be possible
that other mechanisms may complement the action of ER in inducing cell
growth inhibition. Recent studies revealed that mutations in ER
appeared in only a small percentage of tumors that are resistant to Tam
and may not alone contribute to the development of resistance to Tam
(72). Based on the current study, it is possible that a cellular
resistance to Tam could develop as a consequence of multiple factors,
which may include a decrease in metabolism of the Tam, a low rate of
generation of oxidants in response to Tam, and an increase in
expression of antioxidant systems.
Tam also resembles phorbol ester to some extent by inducing membrane
translocation and down-regulation of PKC. Simply an induction of these
changes alone may not lead to tumor promotion. Bryostatin can induce
PKC membrane translocation and down-regulation, but can also block some
actions of PMA and has cancer therapeutic potential (73, 74).
Nevertheless, bryostatin differed from TPA in inducing the extent of
translocation and down-regulation of various isoenzymes (74). Such
quantitative differences may explain the action of tumor promoter
versus a chemopreventive agent.
Further studies in vivo are certainly required to understand
the relation between Tam-induced oxidative regulation of PKC and the
organospecificity involved in therapeutic action of this drug or its
unwanted side affects such as induction of uterine and liver cancer or
retinopathy. In the event that these ER-independent oxidative changes
in PKC are related to side effects of these drugs, antioxidants,
particularly of dietary origin such as vitamin E, vitamin C, and
-carotene, may be a beneficial addition to Tam therapy to reduce the
risk of side effects produced by Tam.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported in part by United States Public
Health Service Grant CA62146 from the National Cancer Institute and
Grant 93B45 from the American Institute for Cancer Research. A
preliminary account of this work was presented at the 86th Annual
Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research, March 18-22,
1994, San Francisco, CA. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Cell and
Neurobiology, USC School of Medicine, 1333 San Pablo St., MMR-330, Los
Angeles, CA 90033. Tel.: 213-342-1771; Fax: 213-221-1235.
1
The abbreviations used are: Tam, tamoxifen;
OH-Tam, 4-hydroxytamoxifen; PKC, protein kinase C; PMA, phorbol
12-myristate 13-acetate; PDBu, phorbol 12,13-acetate; MEM, minimum
essential medium; ER, estrogen receptor; FCS, fetal calf serum; SOD,
superoxidase dismutase; DTT, dithiothreitol.
2
While chelating high concentrations of
Ca2+ with EDTA, it is important to use high strength
alkaline buffer (pH 8) to neutralize the acid released during this
process.
3
It is important to remove
S-nitrosocysteine by centrifuge column technique before
incubation with OH-Tam, which otherwise resulted in inactivation of
more enzyme. Nitric oxide released from S-nitrosocysteine
reacted with superoxide released from the incubation with OH-Tam to
form a more reactive oxidant (presumably peroxynitrite), which
inactivated the enzyme.
Acknowledgments
We thank Deonish Thigpen, Tina La, and David
Chu for excellent technical assistance.
REFERENCES
-
Furr, B. J. A.,
Jordan, V. C.
(1984)
Pharmacol. Ther.
25,
127-205
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jordan, V. C.,
Lababidi, M. K.,
Fakhey, S. L.
(1991)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
83,
492-496
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Henderson, B. E.,
Ross, R. K.,
Pike, M. C.
(1992)
Science
259,
633-638
-
Dickson, R. B.,
Lippman, M. E.
(1987)
Endocr. Rev.
8,
29-43
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lippman, M.,
Bolan, G.,
Huff, K.
(1976)
Cancer Res.
36,
4595-4601
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Darbre, P. D.,
Curtis, S.,
King, R. J. B.
(1984)
Cancer Res.
44,
2790-2793
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Horwitz, K. B.,
Koseki, Y.,
McGuire, W. L.
(1978)
Endocrinology
103,
1742-1751
[Abstract]
-
Reddel, R. R.,
Murphy, L. C.,
Sutherland, R. L.
(1983)
Cancer Res.
43,
4618-24
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Colletta, A. A.,
Wakefield, L. M.,
Howell, F. V.,
van Roozendaal, K.
E.,
Danielpour, D.,
Ebbs, S. R.,
Sporn, M. B.,
Baum, M.
(1990)
Br. J. Cancer
62,
405-409
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jordan, V. C.
(1994)
Breast Cancer Res. Treat.
31,
41-52
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Croxtall, J. D.,
Emmas, C.,
White, J. O.,
Choudhary, Q.,
Flower, R.
J.
(1994)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
47,
197-202
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sudo, K.,
Monsma, F. J.,
Katzenellenbogen, B. S.
(1983)
Endocrinology
112,
425-434
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Watts, C. K. W.,
Murphy, L. C.,
Sutherland, R. L.
(1984)
J. Biol. Chem.
259,
4223-4229
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lam, H.-Y. P.
(1984)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
118,
27-32
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
O'Brian, C. A.,
Liskamp, R. M.,
Solomon, D. H.,
Weinstein, I. B.
(1985)
Cancer Res.
45,
2362-2365
-
Su, H.,
Mazzel, G.,
Yogler, W. R.,
Kuo, J. F.
(1985)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
34,
3649-3653
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nishizuka, Y.
(1992)
Science
258,
607-613
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jaken, S.
(1990)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
2,
192-197
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nakadade, T.,
Jeng, A. Y.,
Blumberg, P. M.
(1988)
Biochem. Pharmacol.
37,
1541-1545
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Edashige, K.,
Sato, E. F.,
Akimaru, K.,
Yoshioka, T.,
Utsumi, K.
(1991)
Cell Struct. Funct.
16,
273-281
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
O'Brian, C. A.,
Ward, N. E.,
Anderson, B. W.
(1988)
J. Natl Cancer Inst.
80,
1628-1233
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bignon, E.,
Pons, M.,
Gilbert, J.,
Nishizuka, Y.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
271,
54-58
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
O'Brian, C. A.,
Liskamp, R. M.,
Solomon, D. H.,
Weinstein, I. B.
(1986)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
76,
1243-1246
-
Gopalakrishna, R.,
Chen, Z. H.,
Gundimeda, U.
(1995)
Methods Enzymol.
252,
134-148
-
Gopalakrishna, R.,
Chen, Z. H,
Gundimeda, U.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
12233-12237
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Han, X.,
Liehr, J. G.
(1992)
Cancer Res.
52,
1360-1363
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mani, C.,
Kupfer, D.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
6052-6058
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Parr, I. B.,
McCargue, R.,
Leclercq, G.,
Stoessel, S.
(1987)
Biochem. Pharm.
36,
1513-1519
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
White, N. H.,
Matteis, F. D.,
Davies, A.,
Smith, L. L.,
Sleigh, C. C.,
Venitt, S.,
Hewer, A.,
Phillips, D. H.
(1992)
Carcinogenesis
13,
2197-2203
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cooney, R. V.,
Pung, A.,
Harwood, P. J.,
Boynton, A. L.,
Zhang, L.,
Hossain, M. H.,
Betram, J. S.
(1992)
Carcinogenesis
13,
1107-1112
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Issandou, M.,
Faucher, C.,
Bayard, F.,
Darbon, J. M.
(1990)
Cancer Res.
50,
5845-5850
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yoshizawa, S.,
Fujiki, H.,
Suguri, H.,
Suganuma, M.,
Nakayasu, M.,
Matsushima, R.,
Sugimura, T.
(1990)
Cancer Res.
50,
4974-4978
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dlugosz, A. A.,
Yuspa, S. H.
(1991)
Cancer Res.
51,
4677-4684
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kiley, S. C.,
Parker, P. J.,
Fabbro, D.,
Jaken, S.
(1992)
Carcinogenesis
13,
1997-2001
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fischer, S. M.,
Furstenberger, G.,
Marks, F.,
Slaga, T. J.
(1987)
Cancer Res.
47,
3174-3179
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yager, J. D.,
Shi, Y. E.
(1991)
Prevent. Med.
20,
27-37
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Williams, G. M.,
Iatropoulos, M. J.,
Djordjevic, M. V.,
Kaltenberg, O. P.
(1993)
Carcinogenesis
14,
315-317
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
King, C. M.
(1995)
Carcinogenesis
16,
1449-1454
[Free Full Text]
-
Huang, K.,
Huang, F. L.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
200,
241-251
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gopalakrishna, R.,
Chen, Z. H.,
Gundimeda, U.,
Wilson, J. C.,
Anderson, W. B.
(1992)
Anal. Biochem.
206,
24-35
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gopalakrishna, R.,
Barsky, S. H.,
Thomas, T. P.,
Anderson, W. B.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
16438-16445
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Downes, C. P.,
Michell, R. H.
(1981)
Biochem. J.
198,
133-140
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lippman, M. E.,
Aitken, S. C.
(1980)
Hormones and Cancer
(Iacobelli, S.,
Lindner, H. R.,
King, R. J. B.,
Lippman, M. E.,
eds)
, p. 3, Raven Press, New York
-
Skehan, P.,
Storeng, R.,
Scudiero, D.,
Monks, A.,
McMahon, J.,
Vistica, D.,
Warren, J. T.,
Bokesch, H.,
Kenney, S.,
Boyd, M. R.
(1990)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
82,
1107-1112
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pentland, A. P.,
Morrison, A. R.,
Jacobs, S. C.,
Hruza, L. L.,
Herbert, J. S.,
Packer, L.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
15578-15584
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stoyanovsky, D., Goldman, R., Claycamp, H. G., and Kagan, V. E. (1995)
Arch. Biochem. Phys. 317, 315-323
-
Sipe, H. J.,
Jordan, S. J.,
Hanna, P. M.,
Mason, R. P.
(1994)
Carcinogenesis
15,
2637-2643
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wiseman, H.,
Laughton, M. J.,
Arnstein, H. R. V.,
Cannon, M.,
Halliwell, B.
(1990)
FEBS Lett.
263,
192-194
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Clarke, R.,
van den Berg, H. W.,
Murphy, R. F.
(1990)
J. Natl. Cancer Inst.
82,
1702-1705
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Quest, A. F. G.,
Bloomenthal, J.,
Bardes, E. S. G.,
Bell, R. M.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10193-10197
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bell, R. M.,
Burns, D. J.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
4661-4664
[Free Full Text]
-
Salgo, M. G.,
Corongiu, F. P.,
Sevanian, A.
(1993)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
304,
123-132
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Natarajan, V.,
Taher, M. M.,
Roehm, B.,
Parinandi, N. L.,
Schmid, H.
H.,
Kiss, Z.,
Garcia, J. G.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem
268,
930-937
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kiss, Z.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
355,
173-177
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Marks, F.,
Hanke, B.,
Thastrup, O.,
Furstenberger, G.
(1991)
Carcinogenesis
12,
1491-1497
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gopalakrishna, R.,
Chen, Z. H.,
Gundimeda, U.
(1992)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
189,
950-957
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Greenlee, W. F.,
Sun, J. D.,
Bus, J. S.
(1981)
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
59,
187-195
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cadenas, E. (1990) in Oxidative Damage and Repair (Davies,
K. J. A, ed) pp. 607-611, Pergamon Press, New York
-
Laughton, M.