|
Volume 271, Number 23,
Issue of June 7, 1996
pp. 13697-13705
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Molecular Cloning and Characterization of Lysosomal Sialic
Acid O-Acetylesterase*
(Received for publication, February 7, 1996)
M. Jorge
Guimarães
§,
J. Fernando
Bazan
,
Janice
Castagnola
¶,
Sandra
Diaz
¶,
Neal G.
Copeland
,
Debra J.
Gilbert
,
Nancy A.
Jenkins
,
Ajit
Varki
¶ and
Albert
Zlotnik
From the DNAX Research Institute of Molecular and
Cellular Biology, Palo Alto, California 94304, the ¶ Glycobiology
Program, University of California at San Diego Cancer Center, La Jolla,
California 92093-0063, and the ABL-Basic Research Program,
NCI-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center,
Frederick, Maryland 21702
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
O-Acetylation and
de-O-acetylation of sialic acids have been implicated in
the regulation of a variety of biological phenomena, including
endogenous lectin recognition, tumor antigenicity, virus binding, and
complement activation. Applying a strategy designed to identify genes
preferentially expressed in active sites of embryonic hematopoiesis, we
isolated a novel cDNA from the pluripotent hematopoietic cell line
FDCPmixA4 whose open reading frame contained sequences homologous to
peptide fragments of a lysosomal sialic acid
O-acetylesterase (Lse) previously purified from rat liver,
but with no evident similarity to endoplasmic reticulum-derived
acetylesterases. The expressed Lse protein exhibits sialic-acid
O-acetylesterase activity that is not attributable to a
typical serine esterase active site. lse expression is
spatially and temporally restricted during embryogenesis, and its
mRNA levels correlate with differences in
O-acetylesterase activity described in adult tissues and
blood cell types. Using interspecific backcross analysis, we further
mapped the lse gene to the central region of mouse
chromosome 9. This constitutes the first report on the molecular
cloning of a sialic acid-specific O-acetylesterase in
vertebrates and suggests novel roles for the 9-O-acetyl
modification of sialic acids during the development and differentiation
of mammalian organisms.
INTRODUCTION
Sialic acids are a family of 9-carbon acidic sugars that
constitute terminal units on diverse oligosaccharide chains of
glycoconjugates in higher invertebrates and vertebrates. Modifications
of the parent sialic acid N-acetylneuraminic acid have been
described that show remarkable molecule and tissue specificity as well
as developmental regulation (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). However, the relationship between
these modifications on sialic acids and specific events in mammalian
development is unclear. The availability of cDNAs encoding sialic
acid-modifying enzymes is therefore expected to be relevant for the
understanding of the role played by sialic acids in the biology of
mammalian organisms (3, 4). One modification of particular interest is
the O-acetylation and de-O-acetylation of sialic
acids, which determines the presence or absence of the outermost
possible structure on typical N-linked oligosaccharides,
i.e. O-acetyl esters (6). These esters have been implicated
in lectin recognition, cell adhesion, tissue morphogenesis, and a
variety of other biological phenomena, including tumor antigenicity,
virus binding, and complement activation (1, 2, 3). Enzymes specifically
capable of removing O-acetyl esters from the 9-position of
sialic acids have been described in viruses (7, 8, 9, 10) and in vertebrates
(11, 12, 13), but no cDNA for the latter group has yet been isolated. A
disulfide-linked heterodimeric protein with sialic acid-specific
9-O-acetylesterase activity was purified from rat liver
membrane compartments and initially called luminal sialic acid
O-acetylesterase (Lse) (11, 14) to differentiate it from a
cytosolic enzyme with similar activity (12, 13). The Lse protein was
subsequently shown to have a primarily lysosomal location (15) and has
hence been renamed lysosomal sialic acid O-acetylesterase
(retaining the acronym Lse). Early attempts to clone this esterase by
conventional methods were thwarted by poor immunoreactivity and extreme
resistance to proteolytic digestion.1 Only
two amino acid sequences were obtained (14), but these were not
strongly immunogenic or useful for cloning using degenerate
oligonucleotides.2
We have recently described a novel strategy to identify genes
differentially expressed throughout development and potentially
involved in hematopoiesis (16, 17). Using this strategy, we identified
a number of short cDNA fragments representing genes preferentially
expressed in the yolk sac and up-regulated during the in
vitro development of embryoid bodies
(EBs)3 (17). Here we describe the cloning
and characterization of one of these genes, a cDNA encoding the
mouse homolog of the purified rat Lse protein. We have expressed the
Lse protein, studied the role of the proteolytic cleavage of the
immature Lse protein into its disulfide-linked heterodimeric form in
generating O-acetylesterase activity (which we attribute to
a novel enzymatic mechanism), examined the tissue distribution of the
mRNA, and mapped the lse gene on mouse chromosome 9. The
molecular cloning of lse should allow the study of the role
of sialic acid esterases in development and tumorigenesis, a task that
until now was impaired by the lack of any vertebrate cDNA encoding
these enzymes.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Isolation of a cDNA encoding Lse
Total RNA derived from
the hematopoietic cell line FDCPmixA4 (18), cultured as described (17),
was obtained using RNAzol solution (Tel-test Inc., Friendswood, TX)
following the manufacturer's instructions. Poly(A)+ RNA
was selected from FDCPmixA4 total RNA, and a phage cDNA library was
made as described (16). The PCR product Clone 165, generated by
differential display by PCR (16, 17), was labeled by random priming
using the Prime-it II kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and used to screen
the FDCPmixA4-derived library (19). Positive clones were purified and
subcloned also as described (16). The complete nucleotide sequence of
Clone 165-109 was obtained as described (16) and deposited in .
Constructs for Protein Expression
Two constructs were
generated for protein expression of Clone 165-109 in COS-7 cells
(American Type Cell Culture) in which a tag (FLAG) sequence (21) was
introduced in the Lse protein. The open reading frame of Clone 165-109 was amplified using a strategy of PCR mutagenesis (22) designed to
allow the introduction of a FLAG peptide sequence either at the C
terminus of the protein (LF construct) or in the middle of the two Lse
subunits (LFL construct). The primers used for the Lse construct were
as follows: sense primer,
5 -CACTTTGCGGCCGCGCACCATGGTTTCCCCGGGGCCTGTGTTTG-3 ; and antisense
primer,
5 -CGTACTAGTTTTACTTGTCATCGTCGTCCTTGTAGTCGATACCCCTGTGTGAAATTTG-3 .
Two sets of primers for two independent reactions were used in
the first round of PCR for the generation of the LFL construct: sense
primer (set 1), 5 -CACTTTGCGGCCGCGCACCATGGTTTCCCCGGGGCCTGTGTTTG-3 ;
antisense primer (set 1),
5 -GGCGTTCCAAAGGACGGAGTGTCTTGTCGGTCCCTTGTCATCGTCGTCCTTGTAGTCAGTCACACGAACAGATGGGACAACCCTAAAAGG-3 ;
sense primer (set 2),
5 -CCTTTTAGGGTTGTCCCATCTGTTCGTGTGACTGACTACAAGGACGACGATGACAAGGGACCGACAAGACACTCCGTCCTTTGGAACGCC-3 ;
and antisense primer (set 2),
5 -CCCTTCATTGCTCAAATTTCACACAGGGGTATCTAAAACTAGTACG-3 . The products
that resulted from these two reactions were gel-extracted and amplified
in a single second PCR to generate the complete LFL construct by using
the sense primer from set 1 and the antisense primer from set 2. Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene) was used with 18 cycles of
PCR using the following parameters: 94 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 4 min. These constructs were cloned into the
PME18X vector (DNAX) using NotI and SpeI sites
incorporated into the 5 - and 3 -primers, respectively.
Sequence and Structural Analysis of the Lse Protein
The
original BLAST program (23) at the National Center for Biotechnology
Information (accessed over the Internet at URL http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Recipon/bs_seq.html)andanenhancedversioncalledBEAUTY(24)developedattheHumanGenomeCenterattheBaylorCollegeofMedicine(http://dot.imgen.bcm.tmc.edu:9331/seq-search/protein-search.html)wereusedtocombnonredundantproteinandnucleotidedatabasesforLsehomologs.ThesearchformoredistantrelativesofLseemployedthesensitivesequencecomparisonstrategiesofAltschuletal.(25)andBorketal.(26);banksofdiagnosticsequencepatterns,motifs,andprofileswerealsoscreenedforfaintmatchestothecomponentLsedomains(forarecentreview,seeRef.27)(http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/mfbork/pattern.html).PredictiveanalysisoftheLsesecondarystructureprincipallyutilizedthePHDneuralnetworkprogram(28)accessedattheEMBLPHDInternetserver(http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/predictprotein/predictprotein.html).PotentialO-glycosylationsitesweresuggestedbytheNetOglycprogram(29)(http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/netOglyc/cbsnetOglyc.html).
Protein Expression of the LF and LFL Constructs
COS-7 cells
were maintained as described (17). Plasmid DNA was transfected as
described (17). Cell lysates and media were collected 3 days after
transfection. Lysis buffer (17) was added to the plates, which were
kept on ice for 45 min. Lysates were centrifuged to eliminate cell
debris (17). Supernatants of centrifuged cell lysates and
sterile-filtered media from cultured cells were incubated with
anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel (Kodak Scientific Imaging Systems, New Haven,
CT) at 4 °C overnight and washed four times with phosphate-buffered
saline. Immunoprecipitates were eluted, neutralized, and concentrated
by precipitation with 24% trichloroacetic acid (Sigma) and 2%
deoxycholic sodium salt (Sigma) as described (17). Pellets were eluted
in 2 × sample buffer (Novex, San Diego, CA), electrophoresed on
4-20% Tris/glycine gels (Novex), and transferred to polyvinylidene
difluoride membranes (Immobilon-P, Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA).
Membranes were exposed to 3% nonfat milk for 1 h at 37 °C.
Anti-FLAG M2 antibody (Kodak) was used in a 1:2000 dilution.
Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse Ig (Amersham Corp.) was
also used at a 1:2000 dilution, and peroxidase detection was performed
with ECL detection reagents (Amersham Corp.) as recommended.
M2-purified LFL construct-derived protein was run on a 8% Tris/glycine
gel and processed as described (14) for amino-terminal gas-phase
sequencing.
Large-scale Purification of the COS Cell-expressed LFL Construct
from Cell Culture Medium
20 dishes of COS cells were seeded at 1 × 106 cells/10-cm culture dish in minimum Eagle's medium
containing 5% fetal calf serum and incubated overnight at 37 °C in
5% CO2. Cells were transfected with 10 µg of plasmid
DNA/plate, with either the LF or LFL construct, using LipofectAMINE
(Life Technologies, Inc.) exactly as per the manufacturer's
recommendations and were left growing in 10 ml of serum-free medium. 5 h later, an equal volume of medium with 10% serum was added to the
cells. ~24 h after transfection, the medium was replaced with 10 ml
of fresh medium containing 5% serum and collected after 3 days. After
centrifugation to remove the cells and filtration to remove any
particulate material, the clarified medium was passed through a 1-ml
column of Bio-Rad Bio-Gel A-agarose resin (equilibrated in
Tris-buffered saline) to preclear any nonspecific binding material. A
small volume of Tris-buffered saline was used to wash the column. The
medium was then incubated with a 1-ml packed volume of anti-FLAG M2
affinity gel (prepared as per the manufacturer's recommendations) at
4 °C overnight with gentle mixing. The medium and resin were poured
into a small column, and the medium was then re-passed through the
column to maximize the binding of the protein. The resin was washed
with 3 × 5 ml of Tris-buffered saline, and bound proteins were eluted
by adding 1 ml of 0.1 M glycine (pH 3.3), allowing 0.5 ml
of the buffer to come through, and then closing off the column and
allowing it to sit for 8 min. The remainder of the eluate was collected
in the same tube as the first 0.5 ml. The column was eluted with an
additional 3 × 1 ml of 0.1 M glycine (pH 3.3). All
collections were in tubes containing 1 M Tris (pH 8.0) to
neutralize the pH immediately.
Digestion with Endo- -N-acetylglucosaminidase H and Peptide
N-Glycosidase F
Protein expressed from the LFL construct was
prepared as described above. For peptide N-glycosidase F
treatment (11, 14), 1.1-µg aliquots were boiled in 20 mM
Tris (pH 8.0), 1% SDS, and 20 mM -mercaptoethanol for
peptide N-glycosidase F for 3 min to denature the protein.
Reaction mixtures (45 µl) containing the denatured esterase, 1.25%
Nonidet P-40, 0.25% SDS, 20 mM -mercaptoethanol, 1 mM 1,10-phenanthroline, and 2 units of peptide
N-glycosidase F in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) were
incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. For
endo- -N-acetylglucosaminidase H treatment (11, 14), the
aliquot was denatured in 0.1% SDS and 0.1 M
-mercaptoethanol as described above, and aliquots with or without
endo- -N-acetylglucosaminidase H (3 milliunits) in 45 µl
of 200 mM sodium citrate (pH 5.0) were incubated at
37 °C for 18 h.
Assay and Reprecipitation of Sialic Acid O-Acetylesterase
Activity-Sialic acid 9-O-acetylesterase activity was
assayed and expressed in units exactly as described previously (11, 14)
using
[acetyl-9-3H]9-O-acetyl-N-acetyl-neuraminic
acid as a substrate under conditions where product formation (release
of [3H]acetate) was linear with time and added enzyme.
Aliquots of the LFL epitope-tagged antibody-eluted preparations were
incubated with either anti-FLAG M2 affinity gel or control Bio-Gel A
overnight at 4 °C in 0.1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) with
mixing. The suspension was centrifuged to separate the supernatant from
the beads. Additional buffer was added to the beads. The substrate
[acetyl-9-3H]9-O-acetyl-N-acetyl-neuraminic
acid was added to both the beads and the supernatant of each sample,
and the activity was determined after 3 h at 37 °C.
Northern Blot and PCR Analyses
Fetal and adult mouse
tissues were isolated, cell lines were cultured, and total RNA was
isolated and used for Northern blot analysis as described (17).
Large-scale preparations of plasmid DNA containing the differential
display by PCR product Clone 165 (17) were made as described (17).
Plasmid DNA was cut with EcoRI, gel-extracted with the QIAEX
gel extraction kit (QIAGEN Inc.), and random-primed with
[ -32P]dCTP (Amersham Corp.) as described (17). 20-µg
samples of total RNA were run on formaldehyde gels (19), transferred to
Nytran membranes (Schleicher & Schuell) by standard methods (19),
hybridized, and washed at 65 °C as described (17).
Total RNA (5 µg) was isolated using RNAzol solution from the cell
lines BL/3 (30), Clone K (31), B9 (DNAX), KD83 (32), CH12 (33), A20
(34), PL1-1,4 P388D1 (35),
B5A,5 PT18 (36), HC7.21 (37), HT2 (38),
D1.1 (39), CDC25 (39), and D10.G4 (40). Total RNA from day 8.5 embryos,
embryonic stem cells, and EBs was prepared as described (17). Reverse
transcription and PCR were performed, and materials were obtained as
described (17). Briefly, the PCR conditions were as follows: denaturing
at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 55 °C for 30 s, and extension at
72 °C for 1 min for 30 cycles using a Perkin-Elmer DNA thermocycler.
Primers for hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase were as described
(17). Primers for lse were 5 -GGAGTCCCTAATACAAGGGATG-3
(sense primer) and 5 -CCAAAGGGTGAGTCTCTATCAC-3 (antisense primer). The
identity of the PCR products was confirmed by size on agarose gels
(expected size of 494 base pairs) and hybridization with an internal
primer (5 -CGGATTATAACAGGGACCTGTAC-3 ) after transfer to a nylon
membrane (19). The probe was labeled at the 5 -end with
[ -32P]ATP (Amersham Corp.) using polynucleotide kinase
(Boehringer Mannheim). Blots were hybridized in 0.5 M
NaHPO4 (pH 7.2), 7% SDS, and 0.5 M EDTA (pH
8.0) at 42 °C for 24 h; washed in 6 × SSC and 0.2% SDS at 42 °C
for 1 h with one change of buffer; and exposed to Kodak X-Omat film
(Eastman Kodak Co.) at 80 °C.
Southern Blot Analysis and Interspecific Mouse Backcross
Mapping
Genomic DNA from HeJ mice was purchased from the Jackson
Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine). DNA digests were obtained using
EcoRI, HindIII, and PstI and processed
as described (19) for Southern blot analysis using as probe entire
random prime-labeled Clone 165-109 DNA.
Interspecific progeny were generated by mapping (C57BL/6J × Mus
spretus)F1 females and C57BL/6J males as described
(41). A total of 205 N2 mice were used to map the
lse locus (see ``Results'' for details). DNA isolation,
restriction enzyme digestion, agarose gel electrophoresis, Southern
blot transfer, and hybridization were performed essentially as
described (19). All blots were prepared with Hybond-N+
(Amersham Corp.). The probe, an ~2.7-kb fragment of mouse cDNA,
was labeled with [ -32P]dCTP using a random prime
labeling kit (Stratagene); washing was done to a final stringency of
1.0 × SSCP and 0.1% SDS at 65 °C. Major fragments of 7.4 and 5.7 kb were detected in TaqI-digested M. spretus DNA.
The presence or absence of the 5.7-kb TaqI M. spretus-specific fragment was followed in backcross mice.
A description of the probes and restriction fragment length
polymorphisms for the loci linked to lse, including E26
avian leukemia oncogene 1 (ets1), thymus cell antigen 1 (thy1), and dopamine receptor 2 (drd2), has been
reported previously (42). Recombination distances were calculated as
described (43) using the computer program SPRETUS MADNESS. Gene order
was determined by minimizing the number of recombination events
required to explain the allele distribution patterns.
RESULTS
Molecular Cloning of a Novel cDNA Encoding Mouse Lse
In a
previous report, we described a strategy directed toward the
understanding of early hematopoietic development by isolating cDNAs
preferentially expressed in the yolk sac, up-regulated during the
in vitro development of EBs, and expressed in the
pluripotent hematopoietic cell line FDCPmixA4 (17). Among the PCR
products identified with the above-described pattern of expression was
a novel 165-base pair DNA sequence designated Clone 165 (17). To
isolate its corresponding complete cDNA, we screened a FDCPmixA4
cell line-derived cDNA library using Clone 165-derived DNA as a
probe. The representation of Clone 165 cDNA in this phage library
was ~1/17,000 (after screening ~5 × 105 independent
clones). Positive clones were purified and subcloned into the pZL1
vector, and their size and restriction digest pattern were analyzed. A
2.7-kb insert, designated Clone 165-109, represented the longest
cDNA among the clones isolated. Its complete sequence was
determined as well as that of another clone with a slightly different
restriction endonuclease digestion pattern. The latter clone,
designated Clone 165-8, was found to represent a partial 1.5-kb
cDNA containing a different polyadenylation site at the
3 -untranslated region (Fig. 1A). The
predicted peptide sequence of Clone 165-109 indicated a 531-amino acid
protein that appeared to be the mouse homolog of the heterodimeric
disulfide-bonded Lse protein purified from rat liver (11, 14).
Pulse-chase studies of the Lse protein in rat hepatoma cells had shown
that the mature dimeric form was derived from the gradual processing
and internal cleavage of a single-chain protein precursor (14) (Fig.
1B) into an ~58-kDa heterodimeric protein with two
subunits of ~38 and ~28 kDa (11, 14). As indicated in Fig.
1C, the protein sequences of the mouse and rat Lse proteins
are highly similar.
Fig. 1.
Identification of a novel cDNA that
encodes mouse Lse. A, nucleotide sequence of Clone 165-109. The rectangular box includes the signal peptide sequence.
The arrow shows the beginning of the peptide sequence that
is homologous to the larger subunit of the heterodimeric rat Lse
protein. The arrowhead identifies an alternative
polyadenylation site found in a different clone (Clone 165-8).
Underlined residues represent potential
N-glycosylation sites. B, diagrammatic
representation of the mouse Lse protein. The hatched box
represents the signal peptide, and numbers represent amino
acid residues positions. C, alignment between the peptide
sequence of rat Lse (14) and the deduced peptide sequence of mouse Lse.
*, residues in the rat sequence for which inconclusive results had been
reported in earlier sequencing (14). D, comparison of the
mouse Lse small subunit sequence (Mo LSE) and the C-terminal
domain from a Clostridium open reading frame (Cl
ORF) (46). Identical residues are in reverse lettering;
chemically conserved amino acids are in black boxes. The
length of gaps in the compressed alignment are indicated by
numbers (of residues) in brackets.
Lse is a lysosomal glycoprotein that traverses the endoplasmic
reticulum-Golgi pathway during biosynthesis (14, 15). The existence of
a secretory signal peptide in mouse Lse is suggested by the presence of
an N-terminal hydrophobic sequence (Fig. 1A); amino-terminal
peptide sequencing reveals that the amino-terminal processing site of
the mature Lse protein is located between Gly Ile at positions 23 and
24 from the first Met (data not shown). Thus, the amino terminus of the
mouse Lse protein corresponds precisely to that of the rat Lse small
subunit peptide fragment (Fig. 1C). Eight potential
N-glycosylation sites (motif of Asn-X-Ser/Thr)
are found scattered in the mature Lse sequence (Fig. 1A);
three potential O-glycosylation sites (threonines at
positions 37, 45, and 51) are also suggested by the NetOglyc neural
network program (29).
Relationship of Lse to Existing Esterase Families
Aside from
the close relationship of embedded sequences in mouse Lse to the rat
Lse peptide fragments (Fig. 1C), a determined search of
nonredundant sequence data bases, including the burgeoning bank of
human-expressed sequence tags (44), failed to uncover clear homologs of
the Lse enzyme. Taking a cue from the proteolytic processing and
functional domain division of the Lse chain (11, 14), the amino- and
carboxyl-terminal domains of Lse (equivalent to the small and large
subunits of Fig. 1B) were then used to separately comb
sequence and structure pattern data banks; in addition, diverse
prediction algorithms (28, 45) were applied to the Lse domain sequences
in order to classify their prospective fold types and to delineate
-helical and -strand segments, en route to a desired structural
description of the Lse component folds and catalytic apparatus.
However, only a faint but significant match to the 266-residue
C-terminal domain of Lse was detected with the carboxyl-terminal
portion of an open reading frame of unknown function at the 3 -end of a
gene cluster involved in porphyrin biosynthesis from the anaerobic
bacterium Clostridium josui (46) (Fig. 1D).
Interestingly, the sequence of the bacterial open reading frame
divulges an additional, likely incomplete, 159-amino acid N-terminal
domain that appears to be unrelated to the mouse Lse amino-terminal
(small) subunit. This different evolutionary pairing of domains
suggests, first, that the heteromeric Lse enzyme is composed of two
distinct globular protein modules and, second, that the function of the
large Lse subunit can be married to other enzymatic schemes.
The catalytic activity of Lse has been shown to be abrogated by the
serine active-site inhibitors diisopropyl fluorophosphate and
diethyl-p-nitrophenyl phosphate;
[3H]diisopropyl fluorophosphate specifically labels the
small enzyme subunit (11). However, inspection of the N-terminal domain
sequence of Lse does not reveal the typical active-site sequence
(Gly-X- -X-Gly) of serine
active-center esterases (47) or the derivative
Gly-Asp- -Arg-Thr/Ser signature of influenza and
coronavirus sialic acid 9-O-acetylesterases (48). A diverse
number of esterase enzymes that contain the former catalytic serine
motif compose a structural superfamily called the / -hydrolases
(49). These enzymes conserve a catalytic triad of Ser, Asp, and His
residues positioned at the carboxyl-terminal end of a parallel
-sheet that forms the core of the hydrolase scaffold; similar
active-site clefts are found in other doubly wound / -folds (50).
Sequence relationships between different / -hydrolase enzymes are
typically detected only after structural superposition of equivalent
topological features (49). Comparison of the presumed Lse catalytic
(small) subunit with this fold family must then rely on structural
considerations. Predictive algorithms (28, 45) accordingly suggest that
both Lse subunits are composed of alternating - and -secondary
structure (data not shown).
Lse Is a Glycoprotein Detectable in Both the Intra- and
Extracellular Compartments
Lysosomal extracts from mouse liver
have an activity corresponding to the rat Lse protein, i.e.
concanavalin A-binding 9-O-acetylesterase activity (data not
shown). However, the previously described polyclonal and monoclonal
antibodies against the rat liver Lse protein (14) do not react with
these extracts (data not shown). To monitor the production of the Lse
protein, we therefore epitope-tagged Clone 165-109 with a FLAG peptide
sequence (21) at the C terminus of the predicted open reading frame of
the cDNA (LF construct). We also generated a construct for protein
expression of mouse Lse in which the FLAG epitope was introduced
immediately before the N terminus of the larger Lse subunit (LFL
construct) (see Figs. 1 (A-C) and 2A). This
allowed us to use the M2 monoclonal antibody, which recognizes the FLAG
sequence, both for purification and detection of the protein by Western
blot analysis. The LFL construct should also allow proteolytic cleavage
using enterokinase, an enzyme for which a recognition site is available
at the C terminus of the FLAG sequence, yielding a heterodimeric
disulfide-bonded protein similar to the mature rat protein (Fig.
2A).
Fig. 2.
Expression of the LF and LFL constructs in
COS-7 cells. A, diagrammatic representation of the LF and
LFL constructs showing the locations where the FLAG sequence was
introduced into the Lse protein coding region. B, Western
blot analysis of immunoprecipitates from lysates and media of COS-7
cells transiently transfected with the expression vector without insert
(PME18X (PME)) and with the LF and LFL constructs. The
immunoprecipitates, run under both reducing and nonreducing conditions,
were obtained and probed with the anti-FLAG M2 antibody. The precursor
peptide obtained with both constructs was not processed into its
heterodimeric disulfide form even 80 h after transfection.
Following transient transfection of COS cells with these constructs,
the cell lysates and media were immunoprecipitated with
agarose-conjugated anti-FLAG antibody and subjected to Western blotting
with anti-FLAG antibody after separation by nonreducing
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. As shown in Fig. 2B
(left panel), both constructs yielded an ~75-kDa protein.
However, no major change in molecular mass was seen after reduction,
indicating that the bulk of the expressed protein was not cleaved into
the two subunits in COS cells (Fig. 2B, right
panel). We observed an ~250-kDa protein band under nonreducing
conditions that disappeared under reducing conditions and likely
represents aggregates of LF and LFL proteins. We also observed that the
LFL protein was less immunoreactive under nonreducing conditions (Figs.
2B and 4), possibly due to the internal location of the FLAG
peptide sequence in this protein. The difference in molecular mass from
that predicted by the cDNA open reading frame (calculated
polypeptide molecular mass is 58.441 kDa using the PEPTIDESORT software
program from the Genetics Computer Group package) could be due to
post-translational modifications (e.g. glycosylation) of the
polypeptide by the COS cells. Indeed, as shown in Fig.
3, treatment of the purified secreted LFL protein with
endo- -N-acetylglucosaminidase H (which cleaves high
mannose and hybrid-type N-linked oligosaccharides) resulted
in a small but reproducible reduction in apparent molecular mass, and
treatment with peptide N-glycosidase F (which cleaves most
known N-linked oligosaccharides) gave a further shift to an
apparent molecular mass of ~62 kDa. Other post-translational
modifications might account for the additional differences in molecular
mass. The remaining discrepancy in molecular mass could be explained by
other post-translational modifications or by failure of the peptide
N-glycosidase F digestion to go to completion because of the
extreme difficulty in denaturing the Lse protein.1 Both
possibilities are supported by the fact that the protein band remains
somewhat diffuse, even after peptide N-glycosidase F
treatment. The appearance of a small amount of low molecular mass
material after peptide N-glycosidase F treatment likely
represents exposure of the polypeptide backbone to a trace protease
that was previously hindered by the oligosaccharide chains.
Fig. 3.
Expressed protein carries
N-linked oligosaccharides. The secreted protein
encoded by the LFL construct was purified from the spent medium of
transfected cells as described and concentrated, and aliquots were
subjected to digestion with endo- -N-acetylglucosaminidase
H (Endo-H) and peptide N-glycosidase F
(PNGase-F) as described under ``Experimental Procedures.''
Treated samples and untreated controls were run on a reducing
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and stained with silver. The molecular mass
markers indicate the positions of known standards.
The protein purified after expression of the LFL construct was
subjected to N-terminal gas-phase sequencing. The sequence obtained
(Ile-Gly-Phe) corresponded to amino acids 24-26 of the open reading
frame, confirming the identity of the expressed product and revealing
the most likely exact location of the signal peptide cleavage site.
Lse Has Sialic Acid O-Acetylesterase Activity
Rat Lse is
gradually processed many hours after synthesis (presumably in the
lysosome) into an ~58-kDa heterodimeric protein with two subunits of
~38 and ~28 kDa (11, 14). However, Western analysis under reducing
conditions did not show cleavage of mouse Lse into two subunits in the
COS cells following transfection with either the LF or LFL construct,
even when cell harvesting was performed more than 80 h after
transfection (Fig. 2B, right panel). This could
be due to an inability of COS cell proteases to process the polypeptide
precursor in the lysosome or to an interference with the accessibility
of the protease cleavage sites due to the introduction of the FLAG
sequences. A similar finding was made when the secreted protein was
analyzed (Fig. 2B, right panel), but this is in
keeping with the fact that the secreted protein from rat hepatoma cells
is also not cleaved (14).
To decrease the possibility of endogenous sialic acid esterase
contamination and due to the lack of endopeptide cleavage of the
intracellular protein expressed in COS-7 cells, we studied the
anti-FLAG antibody-purified preparations derived from the medium of
cells expressing the LFL construct to detect activity against
[O-acetyl-9-3H]sialic acids. The
growth medium from untransfected COS-7 cells yielded no activity (data
not shown). The secreted LFL protein was obtained in microgram
quantities and in apparently pure form (see Fig. 3 for an example).
This molecule did not undergo spontaneous cleavage en route to being
secreted (Fig. 4), but instead underwent the expected
cleavage with enterokinase treatment in vitro. After
enterokinase treatment, a diffuse subunit band of 35 kDa was
detectable. This species likely corresponds to the small subunit
because the FLAG peptide that is immunoreactive with the anti-FLAG
antibody is expected to remain associated with the carboxyl-terminal
end of the amino-terminal subunit.
Fig. 4.
Enterokinase treatment of epitope-tagged LFL
proteins expressed by transfected COS cells. The secreted protein
encoded by the LFL construct was purified from the spent medium of
transfected cells as described and concentrated, and aliquots of 0.375 µg were subjected to digestion with 2 units of enterokinase following
the manufacturer (Biozyme, San Diego, CA) instructions. Reactions were
boiled in sample buffer with or without reducing agents, separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and blotted on Bio-Rad
Trans-Blot filters, which were probed with anti-FLAG antibody. Note
that the unreduced and uncleaved LFL protein is less immunoreactive,
but can be detected upon longer exposure (data not shown).
EK, samples treated with enterokinase; 2-ME,
samples treated with -mercaptoethanol.
The protein preparation derived from the LFL construct showed intrinsic
sialic acid O-acetylesterase activity (950 units/mg), and
only a small increase was seen after enterokinase treatment (1300 units/mg). To confirm that the activity seen was not due to a cellular
contaminant in the purified preparation, the protein was reprecipitated
with anti-FLAG antibody immobilized on agarose. As shown in Fig.
5, the antibody-agarose beads specifically
reprecipitated the activity. These results confirm that the murine
cDNA that we isolated encodes a protein that is structurally and
functionally similar to the previously described rat Lse protein.
Fig. 5.
Reprecipitation of the sialic acid
O-acetylesterase activity purified from COS cells with the
LFL construct. Portions of the secreted protein encoded by the LFL
construct (purified from the spent medium of transfected cells) were
incubated with 20 µl of anti-FLAG-Sepharose beads or control Bio-Gel
A-agarose beads overnight with mixing. After spinning out the beads,
the supernatant (SUPNT.) and the beads were assayed
separately for sialic acid O-acetylesterase activity as
described under ``Experimental Procedures.''
Expression of lse during Mouse Development Is Spatially and
Temporally Restricted: lse Is Not Expressed in All Blood Cell
Types
We had previously observed two differently sized mRNAs
(2.7 and 4.3 kb) reactive with Clone 165 in the yolk sac at day 8.5 of
fetal development (17). Here we analyzed the expression of
lse mRNA at days 11.5 and 15 of fetal development to
evaluate the expression of lse in intraembryonic sites of
hematopoiesis. We confirmed a higher abundance of the 4.3-kb message
and the same proportional distribution of the two different messages
mentioned above in all tissues analyzed (data not shown). At day 11.5, the yolk sac still is a site where the lse mRNA is still
abundant, but this changes by day 15 (Fig. 6).
Interestingly, the day 11.5 aorta-gonada-mesonephros region and fetal
liver, both active sites of embryonic hematopoiesis (17), express
lse more abundantly than the head primordium of the embryo.
We also found a decrease in lse mRNA in fetal liver from
days 11.5 to 15, whereas at the adult stage, this was found to be the
organ where the message is most abundant. The tissue distribution of
the lse mRNA in the adult generally parallels that
reported for the rat lse activity (11), with liver, testis,
and kidney being locations of high expression, whereas skeletal muscle,
adipose tissue, and heart have lower levels of lse
transcripts.
Fig. 6.
Northern and reverse transcription-PCR
analyses of the expression of mouse lse. A,
Northern analysis in fetal and adult tissues. The lse
mRNA is abundant in embryonic sites of active hematopoiesis at day
11.5 (yolk sac (Y.S.), aorta-gonada-mesonephros region
(AGM), and fetal liver (F.L.)) as compared with
the head primordium (H) of the embryo at the same stage of
development. By day 15, there is a down-regulation of the expression of
the message in the tissues analyzed. High levels of expression were
also found in the placenta (Plac.) and in a variety of adult
tissues, with the highest expression in liver, kidney, and testis.
B.M., bone marrow; S.Muscle, skeletal muscle;
A.Fat, perivisceral abdominal fat; FDCP,
hematopoietic cell line FDCPmixA4; STO, fibroblastic cell
line STO; N2a, neuronal cell line N2a.
The 28 S rRNA control used for loading is indicated. B,
reverse transcription-PCR analysis of lse expression in
blood cells, day 8.5 embryos, embryonic stem cells, and EBs. Lane
1, no cDNA added; lane 2, reverse transcriptase
control (FDCPmixA4 RNA to which no reverse transcriptase was added
during the reaction); lane 3, late day 8.5 embryo;
lane 4, day 8.5 yolk sac; lane 5, bipotential
B-cell and myeloid cell line BL/3; lane 6,
interleukin-7-responsive pre-B-cell line Clone K; lane 7,
B-cell line B9; lanes 8-10, B-cell lymphoma-derived cell
lines KD83, CH12, and A20, respectively; lane 11,
placenta-derived cell line PL1-1; lane 12, thymic stroma
from cortisone-treated mice; lanes 13 and 14,
macrophage cell lines P388D1 and B5A, respectively; lane 15,
mast cell line PT18; lane 16, cortisone-treated thymocytes;
lanes 17-21, HC7 cell clone derived from
CD4 CD8 -negative thymocytes, HT2 T-helper
clone, T-helper-1 clone D1.1, and T-helper-2 clones CDC25 and D10.G4,
respectively; lane 22, embryonic stem cells; lanes
23-25, day 3, day 6, and day 9 EBs. HPRT, hypoxanthine
phosphoribosyltransferase.
Given the high expression levels of the lse mRNA in the
hematopoietic cell line FDCPmixA4 relative to the fibroblastic cell
line STO and the neuronal cell line N2a, we sought to
analyze the expression of lse mRNA by reverse
transcription-PCR in a variety of blood cell-derived lines representing
both lymphoid and myeloid lineages (Fig. 6B). The
pluripotent myeloid precursor cell line NFS60 (51), the
virus-transformed erythroleukemic cell line MEL (52), the macrophage
cell lines B5A and P388D1, and the mast cell line PT18 (Fig.
6B) were all found to express the lse message.
Expression was also found in all the T-lymphocyte populations that were
analyzed, including the T-helper-1 clone D1.1, the T-helper-2 clones
D10.G4 and CDC25, and cortisone-treated thymocytes, as well as in the
pre-B-cell line Clone K and a variety of B-lymphoma-derived cell lines.
However, the bipotential B-cell and macrophage precursor cell line BL/3
did not express the lse mRNA even after repeated
30-cycle PCR experiments. The placental stromal cell line PL1.1 and the
thymic stroma of cortisone-treated mice express lse
mRNA.
In a previous report, we detected, using Northern blot analysis, an
up-regulation of the lse mRNA levels by day 6 of the
development of EBs (17). We decided to analyze the expression of
lse by reverse transcription-PCR to try to detect expression
at earlier stages of the in vitro development of embryonic
stem cells into EBs. As shown in Fig. 6B (lanes
22-25), we could detect lse expression in embryonic
stem cells and an apparent decrease in mRNA levels upon the onset
of differentiation of these cells followed by an up-regulation at later
stages of the development of EBs (day 6 EBs). To exclude the
possibility that the signals could be due to genomic DNA contamination
of the RNA, we determined that genomic DNA from HeJ mice produces a
distinctive ~600-base pair PCR product, but not the 494-base pair
product observed with these various cDNAs (data not shown).
Chromosomal Mapping of Mouse lse
Southern blot analysis of
mouse lse with three different enzymes allowed us to
identify a pattern consistent with the existence of a single
lse gene that extends over an ~15-kb genomic DNA sequence
(data not shown). The mouse chromosomal location of lse was
determined by interspecific backcross analysis using progeny derived
from matings of [(C57BL/6J × M. spretus)F1 × C57BL/6J] mice. This interspecific backcross mapping panel has been
typed for over 1900 loci that are well distributed among all the
autosomes as well as the X chromosome (41). C57BL/6J and M. spretus DNAs were digested with several enzymes and analyzed by
Southern blot hybridization for informative restriction fragment length
polymorphisms using a mouse cDNA probe. The 5.7-kb TaqI
M. spretus restriction fragment length polymorphism (see
``Experimental Procedures'') was used to follow the segregation of
the lse locus in backcross mice. The mapping results
indicate that lse is located in the central region of mouse
chromosome 9, linked to ets1, thy1, and
drd2. Although 154 mice were analyzed for every marker and
are shown in the segregation analysis (Fig. 7), up to
162 were typed for some pairs of markers. Each locus was analyzed in
pairwise combinations for recombination frequencies using the
additional data. The ratios of the total number of mice exhibiting
recombinant chromosomes to the total number of mice analyzed for each
pair of loci and the most likely gene order are as follows: centromere,
ets1, 6:158, lse, 11:162, thy1, 2:162,
Drd2. The recombination frequencies (expressed as genetic
distances in centimorgans ± S.E.) are as follows: ets1, 3.8 ± 1.5, lse, 6.8 ± 2.0, thy1, 1.2 ± 0.9, drd2. The central region of mouse chromosome 9 is syntenic
with human chromosome 11q (summarized in Fig. 7), suggesting that human
lse will reside on chromosome 11q as well.
Fig. 7.
lse was placed on mouse chromosome 9 by
interspecific backcross analysis. The segregation patterns of
lse and flanking genes in 154 backcross animals that were
typed for all loci are shown at the top of the figure. For individual
pairs of loci, more than 154 animals were typed (see ``Results'').
Each column represents the chromosome identified in the backcross
progeny that was inherited from the (C57BL/6J × M. spretus)F1 parent. The black boxes
represent the presence of a C57BL/6J allele, and the white
boxes represent the presence of a M. spretus allele.
The number of offspring inheriting each type of chromosome is listed at
the bottom of each column. A partial chromosome 9 linkage map showing
the location of lse in relation to linked genes is shown at
the bottom of the figure. Recombination distances between loci in
centimorgans are shown to the left of the chromosome, and the positions
of the corresponding loci in human chromosomes, where known, are shown
to the right. References for the human map positions of loci cited in
this study can be obtained from Genome Data Base, a computerized data
base of human linkage information maintained by the William H. Welch
Medical Library of The Johns Hopkins University (Baltimore).
We have compared our interspecific map of chromosome 9 with a composite
mouse linkage map that reports the location of many uncloned mutations
(provided by Mouse Genome Data Base, a computerized data base
maintained at the Jackson Laboratory). There are four known mouse
mutations that map in a similar region of chromosome 9:
luxoid (lu), variable spotting
(vs), rough fur (rf), and rough
coat (rc). Of these, DNA was available for the first
three, from the Jackson Laboratory. Southern blots of restriction
digests similar to those of mice with identical background but no
abnormal phenotype showed no obvious genomic differences in their DNAs
(data not shown).
DISCUSSION
We have isolated a cDNA that encodes the sialic acid-specific
modifying enzyme Lse and showed that mouse Lse has the sialic acid
esterase activity originally described for the purified rat protein.
Interestingly, and as previously shown for the rat Lse protein (14),
mouse Lse is also partially secreted. Future studies will explore if
the Lse protein secreted into the extracellular compartment can be
taken up by cells and rendered active by proteolytic digestion and if
the uncleaved native secreted Lse protein is enzymatically competent.
In this regard, it would be interesting to know if this lysosomal
protein carries the mannose 6-phosphate recognition marker found on
most other soluble lysosomal enzymes with a similar itinerary (53).
All sialic acid esterase activities studied to date can be irreversibly
inactivated by diisopropyl fluorophosphate (48), indicating the
presence of a Ser active-site mechanism analogous to the extended
family of serine esterases and proteases (47). Prior studies with rat
Lse have intimated that the small subunit (here shown to be the
amino-terminal domain) was covalently modified by
[3H]diisopropyl fluorophosphate (11). The notable absence
of a hydrolase-like catalytic Ser motif
(Gly-X- -X-Gly) in Lse is tempered
by the recent finding of a bona fide / -hydrolase fold
in a myristoyl-acyl carrier protein-specific thioesterase from
Vibrio harveyi where the active-site Ser residue is embedded
in an Ala-Ala- -Leu-Ser motif (54). In this vein, an
imperfect hydrolase Ser motif (Gly-Gln- , residues
102-104) is evident in Lse, forming a loop between a strongly
predicted -strand and an -helix; a potential active-site His
residue is present at position 163 in a Gly- -Gly
sequence similar to other / -hydrolase His motifs (49).
Alternatively, the Lse catalytic subunit could fold with an
/ -topology distinct from / -hydrolases. For example, the
bacterial response regulator protein CheB, a Ser active-center
methylesterase, has a doubly wound / -fold distinct from the
hydrolase superfamily with a convergent catalytic triad of Ser, His,
and Asp (55). As other mammalian homologs of Lse are characterized, it
may be possible both to sharpen the predicted secondary structure of
Lse and to winnow the number of catalytically relevant residues by
conservation analysis (28, 56), allowing more accurate investigation of
specific candidate motifs for enzymatic activity.
Our lack of knowledge of the precise biological functions of this
enzyme makes it difficult to predict the phenotype that might be
expected for an alteration in its activity in the intact animal.
lse mapped in a region of the composite map that includes
the mouse mutations luxoid (lu), variable
spotting (vs), and rough fur
(rf). A preliminary screen of these mutants (lu,
vs, and rf) failed to show gross alterations of
the lse genomic region. However, this result does not rule
out minor mutations that must be investigated at the nucleotide
sequence level. In this regard, it is important to note that earlier
studies (57) reported that the extent of 9-O-acetylation of
murine erythrocyte sialic acids was affected by an unknown locus on
chromosome 9; one possibility is that this locus corresponds to
lse and that allelic variations in the enzyme are involved
in this polymorphism.
As a lysosomal enzyme, the Lse protein might be involved only in the
terminal degradation of O-acetylated sialic acids. On the
other hand, the differential expression of Lse mRNA throughout both
in vivo and in vitro development suggests a role
for the de-O-acetylation of sialic acids in developmental
processes. If so, this would explain why the cellular enzyme binds well
to concanavalin A, while the secreted form shows only a small shift
with endo- -N-acetylglucosaminidase H digestion. In this
regard, transgenic mice constitutively overexpressing a viral protein
with de-O-acetylation activity at the cell surface have been
found to arrest development at the two-cell stage embryo or to show
developmental abnormalities at later stages (58). More important, we
have observed low levels of lse mRNA upon induction of
embryonic stem cell differentiation, followed by an increase in
lse mRNA levels at later stages of the in
vitro development of EBs (Fig. 6B) (16). An interesting
aspect to note is the preferential expression of the message in active
sites of hematopoiesis during fetal development: the yolk sac,
aorta-gonada-mesonephros region (17), and fetal liver. Moreover, the
pluripotent hematopoietic cell line FDCPmixA4 shows higher levels of
the message than the fibroblastic cell line STO or the neuronal cell
line N2a. It will be challenging to find out what is the
role played by this sialic acid modification in the yolk sac or during
the early stages of the in vitro development of EBs. It is
possible that by influencing the hydrophobicity, conformation, or
structure of glycoconjugates, de-O-acetylation may influence
the cellular interactions that occur during embryogenesis and possibly
have a role in the development of blood and/or primordial germinative
cells as these cells migrate from the yolk sac to home to their
intraembryonic compartments.
Analysis of lse expression in blood cell lines showed that
the message is widely distributed among various blood cell populations.
However, the finding of a bipotential B-cell and myeloid progenitor
that does not express the message points to the possibility that
lse may be differentially expressed throughout successive
steps of the ontogeny of different blood cell types, namely B- and
T-lymphocytes. Indeed, selective expression of O-acetylated
sialic acids has been reported in subpopulations of thymocytes and
peripheral leucocytes (59, 60, 61, 62, 63). Further studies involving in
situ staining techniques to analyze the expression of
lse in lymphoid organs and purified populations of
lymphocytes will be required to characterize these differences.
Moreover, immunohistological studies of lymphoid tissues show that
potential ligands capable of mediating CD22 -dependent
B-cell adhesion events are masked by 9-O-acetylation of
sialic acids on specific cell types and are regionally distributed
(62). Specifically, it was found that masking of CD22 ligands by
9-O-acetylation is differentially regulated on the same cell
type between two different lymphoid organs. The availability of
lse cDNA presented here, in conjunction with studies on
the differential activity of the enzymes involved in the synthesis of
9-O-acetylated sialic acids, will help to explore the
involvement of 9-O-acetyl esters in the molecular mechanisms
by which lymphocytes within lymphoid tissues are segregated into
distinct microdomains (62). Furthermore, T-cells of patients with
various malignancies have been reported to acquire
O-acetylation, and the addition of a single
O-acetyl group to a cell surface-associated ganglioside can
create an unusual cell type-specific antigen (63). The limited
exploration of these matters is in great part due to the lack of
mammalian cDNAs encoding the enzymes that regulate
O-acetylation. This report will therefore constitute an
important advance in the study of the role of
de-O-acetylation of sialic acids in various aspects of
mammalian biology, including development, hematopoiesis, and
tumorigenesis.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported in part by a Veterans Administration
merit review award and Grant RO1GM32373 (to A. V.) and by NCI,
Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract NO1-CO-4600
with ABL. Work performed at the DNAX Research Institute of Molecular
and Cellular Biology was supported by Schering-Plough Corp. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Supported by Junta Nacional de Investigação
Científica e Tecnológica, Portugal (Grant Number
CIÊNCIA/BD/2685/93). To whom correspondence should be addressed: DNAX
Research Inst., 901 California Ave., Palo Alto, CA 94394. Tel.:
415-496-1172; Fax: 415-496-1200; E-mail: guimaraes{at}dnax.org.
1
B. K. Hayes and A. Varki, unpublished
observations.
2
H. H. Higa and A. Varki, unpublished
results.
3
The abbreviations used are: EBs, embryoid
bodies; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; kb, kilobase(s).
4
S. Hudack, unpublished results.
5
D. Rennick, unpublished results.
Acknowledgments
We thank Professors J. M. Pina Cabral and A. Coutinho for guidance. We also thank Dr. T. McClanahan for kindly
providing the blood cell-derived cDNAs; Drs. F. Lee and R. A. Kastelein for advice; B. Devaux for critical reading of the manuscript;
D. Campbell, D. Gilbert, and D. A. Barnhart for excellent assistance;
and Dr. G. Hardiman for encouragement.
REFERENCES
-
Schauer, R.
(1982)
Cell Biology Monograph
, Vol 10, Springer
-Verlag, New York
-
Schauer, R.
(1991)
Glycobiology
1,
449-452
[Free Full Text]
-
Varki, A.
(1992)
Glycobiology
2,
25-40
[Free Full Text]
-
Varki, A.
(1993)
Glycobiology
3,
97-130
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Roth, J.
(1993)
Histochem. J.
25,
687-710
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Diaz, S.,
Higa, H. H.,
Hayes, B. K.,
Varki, A.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
19416-19426
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Herrler, G.,
Rott, R.,
Klenk, H.-D.,
Muller, H.-P.,
Shukla, A. K.,
Schauer, R.
(1985)
EMBO J.
4,
1503-1506
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Vlasak, R.,
Luytjes, W.,
Spaan, W.,
Palese, P.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
4526-4529
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vlasak, R.,
Muster, T.,
Lauro, A. M.,
Powers, J. C.,
Palese, P.
(1989)
J. Virol.
63,
2056-2062
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Herrler, G.,
Klenk, H.-D.
(1991)
Adv. Virus Res.
40,
213-234
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Higa, H. H.,
Manzi, A.,
Varki, A.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
19435-19442
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schauer, R.,
Reuter, G.,
Stoll, S.
(1988)
Biochimie
(Paris)
70,
1511-1519
-
Schauer, R.,
Reuter, G.,
Stoll, S.,
Shukla, A. K.
(1989)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
106,
143-150
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Butor, C.,
Higa, H. H.,
Varki, A.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10207-10213
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Butor, C.,
Griffiths, G.,
Aronson, N. N., Jr.,
Varki, A.
(1995)
J. Cell Sci.
108,
2213-2219
[Abstract]
-
Guimarães, M. J.,
Lee, F.,
Zlotnik, A.,
McClanahan, T.
(1995)
Nucleic Acids Res.
23,
1832-1833
[Free Full Text]
-
Guimarães, M.,
Bazan, J. F.,
Zlotnik, A.,
Wiles, M. V.,
Grimaldi, J. C.,
Lee, F.,
McClanahan, T.
(1995)
Development
(Camb.)
121,
3335-3346
[Abstract]
-
Ford, A. M.,
Healy, L. H.,
Bennett, C. A.,
Navarro, E.,
Spooncer, E.,
Greaves, M. F.
(1992)
Blood
79,
1962-1971
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Benson, D. A.,
Boguski, M.,
Lipman, D. J.,
Ostell, J.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
3441-3444
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hopp, T. P.,
Prickett, K. S.,
Price, U.,
Libby, R. T.,
March, C. J.,
Cerretti, P.,
Urdal, D. L.,
Conlon, P. J.
(1988)
Bio/Technology
6,
1205-1210
-
Vallette, F.,
Mege, E.,
Reiss, A.,
Adenski, M.
(1989)
Nucleic Acids Res.
17,
723-733
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Altschul, S. F.,
Gish, W.,
Miller, W.,
Myers, E. W.,
Lipman, D. J.
(1990)
J. Mol. Biol.
215,
403-410
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Worley, K. C., Wiese, B., and Smith, R. F. (1995) Genome Res.
5, 173-184
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Altschul, S. F.,
Boguski, M. S.,
Gish, W.,
Wootton, J. C.
(1994)
Nat. Genet.
6,
119-129
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bork, P.,
Ouzounis, C.,
Sander, C.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
4,
393-403
[CrossRef]
-
Bork, P.,
Gibson, T.
(1996)
Methods Enzymol.
266,
162-184
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rost, B., and Sander, C. (1996) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol.
Struct. 25, in press
-
Hansen, J. E.,
Lund, O.,
Engelbrecht, J.,
Bohr, H.,
Nielsen, J. O.,
Hansen, J. E. S.,
Brunak, S.
(1995)
Biochem. J.
308,
801-813
-
Rennick, D.,
Jackson, J.,
Moulds, C.,
Lee, F.,
Yang, G.
(1989)
J. Immunol.
142,
161-166
[Abstract]
-
Hunt, P.,
Robertson, D.,
Weiss, D.,
Rennick, D.,
Lee, F.,
Witte, O.
N.
(1987)
Cell
48,
997-1007
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Everson, M. P.,
Brown, C. B.,
Lilly, M. B.
(1989)
Blood
74,
1472-1476
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Arnold, L. W.,
LoCascio, N. J.,
Lutz, P. M.,
Pennell, C. A.,
Klapper, D.,
Haughton, G.
(1983)
J. Immunol.
131,
2064-2073
[Abstract]
-
Kim, K. J.,
Dejoy, S. Q.
(1986)
Immunology
59,
15-21
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bauer, S. R.,
Holmes, K. L.,
Morse, H. C., III,
Potter, M.
(1986)
J. Immunol.
136,
4695-4699
[Abstract]
-
Undem, B. J.,
Torphy, T. J.,
Goldman, D.,
Chilton, F. H.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
6750-6758
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
MacNeil, I.,
Kennedy, J.,
Godfrey, D. I.,
Jenkins, N. A.,
Masciantonio, M.,
Mineo, C.,
Gilbert, D. J.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Boyd, R. L.,
Zlotnik, A.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
151,
6913-6923
[Abstract]
-
Watson, J.
(1979)
J. Exp. Med.
150,
1510-1519
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lederer, J. A.,
Liou, J. S.,
Todd, M. D.,
Glimcher, L. H.,
Lichtman, A. H.
(1993)
J. Immunol.
152,
77-86
[Abstract]
-
Deibel, M. R., Jr.,
Killar, L. M.
(1988)
Lymphokine Res.
7,
469-477
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Copeland, N. G.,
Jenkins, N. A.
(1991)
Trends Genet.
7,
113-118
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wilkie, T. M.,
Chen, D. J.,
Moore, K. J.,
Yu, L.,
Simon, M. I.,
Copeland, N. G.,
Jenkins, N. A.
(1993)
Genomics
18,
175-184
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Green, E. L.
(1981)
Genetics and Probability in Animal Breeding Experiments
, p. 77, Oxford University Press, New York
-
Boguski, M. S.
(1995)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
20,
295-296
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bazan, J. F.
(1996)
Proteins
24,
1-17
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fujino, E.,
Fujino, T.,
Karita, S.,
Sakka, K.,
Ohmiya, K.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
5169-5175
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brenner, S.
(1988)
Nature
334,
528-530
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hayes, B. K.,
Varki, A.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
19443-19448
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ollis, D. L.,
Cheah, E.,
Cygler, M.,
Dijkstra, B.,
Frolow, F.,
Franken, S. M.,
Harel, M.,
Remington, S. J.,
Silman, I.,
Schrag, J.,
Sussman, J.
L.,
Verschueren, K. H. G.,
Goldman, A.
(1992)
Protein Eng.
5,
197-211
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Branden, C. I.
(1980)
Q. Rev. Biophys.
13,
317-338
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bourette, R. P.,
Mouchiroud, G.,
Ouazana, R.,
Morlé, F.,
Godet, J.,
Blanchet, J.-P.
(1993)
Blood
81,
2511-2520
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Marks, P. A.,
Rifkind, R. A.
(1979)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
47,
419-448
-
Kornfeld, S.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
61,
307-330
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lawson, D. M.,
Derewenda, U.,
Serre, L.,
Ferri, S.,
Szittner, R.,
Wei, Y.,
Meighen, E. A.,
Derewenda, Z. S.
(1994)
Biochemistry
33,
9382-9388
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
West, A. H.,
Martinez-Hackert, E.,
Stock, A. M.
(1995)
J. Mol. Biol.
250,
276-290
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zvelebil, M. J.,
Sternberg, M. J.
(1988)
Protein Eng.
2,
127-138
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Varki, A.,
Kornfeld, S.
(1980)
J. Exp. Med.
152,
532-544
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Varki, A.,
Hooshmand, F.,
Diaz, S.,
Varki, N. M.,
Hedrick, S. M.
(1991)
Cell
65,
65-74
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kamerling, J. P.,
Makovitzky, J.,
Schauer, R.,
Vliegenthart, J. F. G.,
Wember, M.
(1982)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
714,
351-355
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kniep, B.,
Claus, C.,
Peter-Katalinic, J.,
Monner, D. A.,
Dippold, W.,
Nimtz, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30173-30180
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zimmer, G.,
Suguri, T.,
Reuter, G.,
Yu, R. K.,
Schauer, R.,
Herrler, G.
(1994)
Glycobiology
4,
343-350
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sjoberg, E. R.,
Powell, L. D.,
Klein, A.,
Varki, A.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
549-562
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cheresh, D. A.,
Reisfeld, R. A.,
Varki, A. P.
(1984)
Science
225,
844-846
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Cariappa, H. Takematsu, H. Liu, S. Diaz, K. Haider, C. Boboila, G. Kalloo, M. Connole, H. N. Shi, N. Varki, et al.
B cell antigen receptor signal strength and peripheral B cell development are regulated by a 9-O-acetyl sialic acid esterase
J. Exp. Med.,
January 16, 2009;
206(1):
125 - 138.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Jessani, Y. Liu, M. Humphrey, and B. F. Cravatt
Enzyme activity profiles of the secreted and membrane proteome that depict cancer cell invasiveness
PNAS,
August 6, 2002;
99(16):
10335 - 10340.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Crottet, M. C. Peitsch, C. Servis, and B. Corthesy
Covalent Homodimers of Murine Secretory Component Induced by Epitope Substitution Unravel the Capacity of the Polymeric Ig Receptor to Dimerize Noncovalently in the Absence of IgA Ligand
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 29, 1999;
274(44):
31445 - 31455.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Takematsu, S. Diaz, A. Stoddart, Y. Zhang, and A. Varki
Lysosomal and Cytosolic Sialic Acid 9-O-Acetylesterase Activities Can Be Encoded by One Gene via Differential Usage of a Signal Peptide-encoding Exon at the N Terminus
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 3, 1999;
274(36):
25623 - 25631.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-C. Wang, S.-C. Lu, H.-L. Chen, and T.-H. Liao
Porcine Spleen Deoxyribonuclease II. COVALENT STRUCTURE, cDNA SEQUENCE, MOLECULAR CLONING, AND GENE EXPRESSION
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 3, 1998;
273(27):
17192 - 17198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|