|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Received for publication, February 12, 1996, and in revised form, March 22, 1996)
From the SR-12813 (tetra-ethyl
2-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)ethenyl-1,1-bisphosphonate)
lowers plasma cholesterol in five species. In this paper we investigate
the underlying mechanism using Hep G2 cells. SR-12813 inhibited
incorporation of tritiated water into cholesterol with an
IC50 of 1.2 µM but had no effect on fatty
acid synthesis. Furthermore, SR-12813 reduced cellular
3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase activity with
an IC50 of 0.85 µM. The inhibition of HMG-CoA
reductase activity was rapid with a T1/2 of 10 min.
After a 16-h incubation with SR-12813, mRNA levels of HMG-CoA
reductase and low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor were increased.
The increased expression of LDL receptor translated into a higher LDL
uptake, which can explain the primary hypocholesterolemic effect of
SR-12813 in vivo. Western blot analysis indicated that the
amount of HMG-CoA reductase protein rapidly decreased in the presence
of SR-12813. Pulse-chase experiments with [35S]methionine
showed that the T1/2 of HMG-CoA reductase
degradation decreased in the presence of SR-12813 from 90 to 20 min.
Pre-incubation with 50 µM of lovastatin did not prevent
the effects of SR-12813 on HMG-CoA reductase degradation, indicating
that the compound does not need mevalonate-derived regulators for its
action. It is concluded that SR-12813 inhibits cholesterol synthesis
mainly by an enhanced degradation of HMG-CoA reductase.
SR-12813 (tetra-ethyl 2-(3,
5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)ethenyl-1,1-bisphosphonate;
see Fig. 1) and related compounds are potent hypocholesterolemic drugs
in mouse, rat, hamster, rabbit, dog, and monkey (1). To explain these
cholesterol-lowering effects, studies were initiated in the human
hepatoma cell line Hep G2. These cells are particularly suitable to
study effects on lipid metabolism (2, 3, 4). Our initial studies in Hep G2
cells showed that SR-12813 inhibited cholesterol biosynthesis at the
level of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A
(HMG-CoA)1 reductase, the key regulatory
enzyme in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway (5). The regulation of
cellular HMG-CoA reductase activity is extremely complicated. The basis
for this is that mevalonate, the product of the enzymatic reaction, is
not only the precursor for the biosynthesis of cholesterol but also for
a variety of other important products like dolichols, ubiquinones, and
isoprenoids, which are required for growth and survival of the cell.
Feedback mechanisms for the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway impinge on
HMG-CoA reductase expression. HMG-CoA reductase is regulated on a
transcriptional level by (oxy)sterols (6, 7). Post-transcriptionally,
feedback regulation on HMG-CoA reductase synthesis and degradation is
provided by isoprenoid metabolites (7, 8, 9, 10, 11), by oxylanosterols (12, 13, 14, 15),
and by oxysterols like 25-hydroxycholesterol. The specific activity of
HMG-CoA reductase is reversibly regulated by phosphorylation by AMP
kinase (16) and by oxidation events (17, 18) or possibly by still
unknown mechanisms (19, 20). HMG-CoA reductase has a molecular mass of
98 kDa and resides in the endoplasmic reticulum, where the enzyme also
is degraded (21, 22).
In the present report we present evidence that SR-12813 decreases
cholesterol synthesis by increasing HMG-CoA reductase degradation. Our
data further show that none of the other known regulation mechanisms as
mentioned above is involved and that SR-12813 does not inhibit HMG-CoA
reductase activity directly. Two alternative proposals were tested,
that SR-12813 functions as a direct suppressor or that it elicits the
formation of regulatory isoprenoids. Our results favor a direct action
and further suggest that SR-12813 operates to rapidly inactivate of
HMG-CoA reductase activity by a mechanism that primes the enzyme for
degradation.
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium/HEPES was purchased from Flow laboratories. Cab-osil M-5 was
from Fluka. Lovastatin was a generous gift from Merck Sharp and Dohme.
Benzamidine, leupeptin, pepstatin, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride,
soybean trypsin inhibitor, 1-chloro-3-tosylamido-7-amino-2-heptanone,
tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone, protein A-agarose (high
affinity), and N-ethylmaleimide were all from Sigma. BCA
protein assay reagent was from Pierce. Fluorotran and Biodyne A
membranes were from Pall. HR 58, the catalytic subunit of human HMG-CoA
reductase, and rabbit anti-HR58 antibody were from Ruth Mayer (SB,
Upper Merion (14)). Rabbit antibody against HMG-CoA reductase catalytic
subunit from rat HR 53 (16) was from Dr. G. Hardie, University of
Dundee. Hep G2 cells were from the ECACC (deposited by B. Knowles,
Wistar Institute). SR-12813 (Fig. 1) was made by
Symphar.2 cDNA probes for HMG-CoA
reductase and LDL receptor were prepared as described (23).
[3H2O],
[1 Hep G2 cells were grown to confluence on
6-well or 24-well Costar plates in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium/20 mM HEPES/10% fetal calf serum/glutamine/0.85
g/liter bicarbonate in 2% CO2/air. Lipoprotein-deficient
serum (LPDS) was prepared from fetal calf serum using Cab-osil M-5 as
described previously (14). Unless stated otherwise, before an
experiment fetal calf serum was replaced by 5% LPDS overnight.
Tritiated water incorporation into lipids followed
basically the protocol of (24) with slight modifications. Briefly,
cells were grown to 80% confluency. SR-12813 in Me2SO
(final concentration, 0.1%) was added 1 h before the addition of
1.8 mCi of [3H2O] to each well. Cells were
incubated for a further hour, and tritium incorporation in cholesterol
and fatty acids was determined as described (24). For acetate
incorporations into cholesterol Hep G2 cells were pre-incubated for
16 h in 5% LPDS medium with or without SR-12813. This was
followed by a 1.5-h addition of 16 µCi of [14C]acetate
(13 µCi/µmol)/10-cm2 well. Lipids were extracted using
chloroform/methanol/water (1:2:0.8, v/v (25)) with the inclusion of a
known amount of [3H]cholesterol as a recovery marker for
the extractions. The chloroform layer was dried under nitrogen,
and the lipid fraction was redissolved in 1 ml of hexane. Lipids were
separated by chromatography on Kieselgel 60 (Merck) silica TLC plates
developed in hexane/diethyl ether/acetic acid (80:20:1, v/v). The
cholesterol band was scraped off, and the radioactivity was determined
by liquid scintillation counting.
Mevalonate
incorporations were carried out as described (14). Briefly, 10 µM SR-12813 was added to the cells 20 min before the
addition of [3H]mevalonic acid lactone (0.2 µCi/nmol;
final concentration, 100 µM), and cells were incubated
for 2 h. Cells were saponified in 2 M NaOH/65%
ethanol, and [14C]cholesterol (about 2500 dpm) was added
to each tube as a recovery marker. Nonsaponifiable lipids were three
times extracted from the aqueous phase with hexane. The lipids were
redissolved in 150 µl of hexane and analyzed on 20 × 5-cm
silica TLC plates developed in hexane/diethylether (1:1). Iodine was
used to stain the marker lipids. Bands that aligned with the
marker cholesterol were scraped from the plate and counted.
HMG-CoA
reductase activity was measured essentially as described (24, 26).
Briefly, compounds were added to the cells in Me2SO (final
concentration, 0.1%). After the experiment cells were lysed by the
addition of 0.1 ml of 0.25% Brij 96, 0.1 M sucrose, 0.1 M KF, 50 mM KCl, 40 mM potassium
dihydrophosphate, 30 mM EDTA, 5 mM
dithiothreitol, pH 7.4 at room temperature. In some experiments KF was
omitted to measure ``total'' HMG-CoA reductase activity (27). HMG-CoA
reductase activity in the cell lysate was further determined as
described (24).
Protein levels of HMG-CoA reductase were
determined by immunoblot analysis. 6-well Costar plates containing
confluent Hep G2 cells were pre-incubated overnight in 5% LPDS medium.
For some experiments 0.1 µM lovastatin was included
overnight. Cells were incubated with 5 µM SR-12813 in
0.1% Me2SO. After the period of incubation, the cells were
washed twice with ice-cold buffer containing 50 mM HEPES,
pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM EGTA. Then 300 µl of lysing buffer was added to each
well. Lysing buffer consisted of the above buffer with the following
added: 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 mM N-ethyl maleimide, 2.2% Me2SO,
1% Triton X-100, 0.5 mM leupeptin (28). Lysed cells were
homogenized using a 1-ml syringe with and 21 gauge needle. After being
on-ice for 10 min, the samples were centrifuged at 11,000 × g for 5 min. To 300 µl of supernatant, 900 µl of sample
buffer was added. The sample buffer consisted of 0.5 M
Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 20% glycerol, 2% SDS (w/v), 5%
Degradation
rates of HMG-CoA reductase in Hep G2 cells were basically determined
according to Edwards (31). Experiments were set up in a staggered
fashion such that all chases were terminating at the same time. Cells
were preincubated in 5% LPDS medium overnight in 6-well plates. Cells
were pre-incubated for 15 min with 1.5 ml/well methionine-free 5% LPDS
medium made to pH 7.0 before 40 µCi of [35S]methionine
was included for 1 h. Under our experimental conditions,
methionine incorporations into protein were linear for at least 2 h (not shown). Methionine-free medium was then replaced with 2 mM methionine, 5% LPDS medium, and compound (final
concentration, 0.1% Me2SO). The cells were incubated for a
further 0-3 h before all reactions were terminated at the same time.
Cells were solubilized in 0.5 ml of ice-cold lysis buffer containing
1% Triton X-100, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, 50 mM
NaCl, 50 mM NaF, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.2, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA (32). The following protease
inhibitors were added just before the experiment to the final
concentration indicated; 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride, 0.1 mM leupeptin, 0.1 mM
1-chloro-3-tosylamido-7-amino-2-heptanone, 0.1 mM
benzamidine, 0.1 mM soybean trypsin inhibitor, 0.1 mM tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone (16).
The samples were homogenized using a syringe and a 21 gauge needle
before being left on ice for 10 min and then spun in a microfuge for 5 min. To measure the incorporation of [35S]methionine into
the total protein fraction, two times 5 µl of the supernatant was
mixed with 100 µl of 10 mg/ml BSA, followed by 1 ml of ice-cold 5%
(w/v) trichloroacetic acid. The precipitated protein was collected by
centrifugation (table centrifuge, 10 min, 4 °C). The pellet was
dissolved in 0.1 ml of distilled water and 2 ml of Soluene 350; 10 ml
of Hionic Fluor (Packard) was then added for counting.
The remaining supernatant containing the solubilized protein was
incubated with 10 µl of rabbit anti-HR53 or with 10 µl of rabbit
nonimmune serum on ice for 1 h. 40 µl of protein A-agarose were
then added to the samples and incubated overnight at 4 °C on an
rotary shaker. After a 20-s centrifugation, the immune complexes were
washed three times with 1 ml of lysis buffer (no protease inhibitors).
Samples were incubated at room temperature for 30 min in the presence
of 150 µl of 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 5% Measurement of LDL
receptor-dependent association and degradation of LDL was
basically as described previously (24). Briefly, Hep G2 cells were
incubated with 5% LPDS medium in the presence of SR-12813, lovastatin
(free acid), or 0.1% (v/v) dimethylsulfoxide (control). The cells were
incubated for 16 h. The medium was removed, 300 µl of
125I-LDL (10 µg/ml, 53 cpm/ng) was added, and incubation
continued for 2.5 h. At the end of the incubation, 250 µl of the
medium was collected, and the cells were washed at 0 °C six times
with 1 ml of ice-cold PBS containing 1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin and
1 mM CaCl2 and once with PBS only. Cells were
dissolved into 0.2 N NaOH, and cellular protein was
measured. The radioactive content of the samples was determined and
used as a measure for association of LDL. For degradation, bovine serum
albumin, trichloroacetic acid, and AgNO3 (final
concentrations, 0.2%, 0.5 M, and 0.115 M,
respectively) were added to the medium samples to precipitate
125I-LDL and free iodide (33). The degradation product from
125I-LDL, iodotyrosine, remained in the supernatant and was
counted. Nonspecific 125I-LDL association and degradation
were determined by including 300 µg/ml of unlabeled LDL in the
experiment (1 well/dose).
Hep
G2 cells on a 6-well plate were incubated with either 1 µM lovastatin or 3 µM SR-12813 in 5% LPDS
medium. mRNA was isolated using a Fast-track kit (Invitrogen).
mRNAs were analyzed as described (23). Briefly, mRNAs were
separated by electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose/formaldehyde gel. RNA
was transferred to Biodyne A nylon membrane by capillary blotting using
20 × SSC and fixed to the membrane by UV light. Blots were
prehybridized for 15 min at 68 °C in 200 mM sodium
phosphate, pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 1% w/v BSA, 7% SDS, and
15% deionized formamide (v/v) and then hybridized for 18-20 h at
68 °C in the same buffer containing the 32P-labeled
cDNA probes. Blots were washed at 68 °C in 40 mM
sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, 1 mM EDTA, 1% SDS (w/v).
Autoradiographs were scanned with a Joyce-Loebl chromoscan III
densitometer.
To measure the
effects of SR-12813 on sterol synthesis Hep G2 cells were incubated
with different radiolabeled precursors, and incorporation of
radioactivity into cholesterol was determined. SR-12813 inhibited the
incorporation of 3H2O into cholesterol in Hep
G2 cells (Fig. 2A) with an IC50
of 1.2 µM. A similar inhibition with an IC50
of 0.6 µM was found when [14C]acetate was
used instead of 3H2O (Fig. 2A).
There were no effects of SR-12813 on the incorporation of
3H2O into fatty acids. Incorporation of
[3H]mevalonic acid lactone into cholesterol was not
influenced in the presence of SR-12813 (Fig. 2B) nor into
squalene and farnesol.3 In good agreement
with this finding, the sterol profile of the nonsaponifiable lipid
fraction from Hep G2 cells treated for 16 h with SR-12813 showed
no increase in any of the sterol intermediates (not shown, but similar
to sterol profile of control in Ref. 34). These data indicate that
SR-12813 interferes with the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway at the
level of one of the enzymatic conversions between acetyl-CoA and
mevalonate but not beyond HMG-CoA reductase.
Exposure of
Hep G2 cells to SR-12813 inhibited cellular HMG-CoA reductase activity
with an apparent IC50 of 0.85 µM (Fig.
3A). This agreed well with the
IC50 of 1.2 µM found for the inhibition of
3H2O incorporation into cholesterol shown in
Fig. 2A. Inhibition of 50% of the activity was achieved in
10 min (Fig. 3B). At concentrations of 5 µM
SR-12813, the maximum inhibition was 80% of the initial activity, and
inhibition lasted for periods of 24 h or more (see also Fig.
2A). No direct effect of SR-12813 on the activity of HR 58, the cloned catalytic subunit of human HMG-CoA reductase (14), at
concentrations of SR-12813 of up to 0.5 mM was observed nor
on the activity of Hep G2 cellular extracts (10 µM).
These data indicate that the activity of HMG-CoA reductase is strongly
suppressed in the presence of SR-12813 in cells but that there is no
direct inhibition. HMG-CoA reductase can be inactivated via an AMP
kinase-mediated phosphorylation (16). We investigated if SR-12813
inactivated HMG-CoA reductase via an increased phosphorylation of
HMG-CoA reductase. The HMG-CoA reductase activity assay is routinely
performed in the presence of fluoride to give the ``expressed
activity'' (27), which represents the activity of HMG-CoA reductase in
the cell. When fluoride is omitted, phosphorylated, mostly inactive,
HMG-CoA reductase is dephosphorylated by phosphatases to yield total
activity. Under these conditions HMG-CoA reductase activity was still
decreased by SR-12813 (Fig. 3B). HMG-CoA reductase activity
in controls increased about 3-fold from 48 to 132 pmol/min/mg cellular
protein, showing that reductase was indeed reactivated in our
experimental conditions. This finding indicated that SR-12813 did not
increase phosphorylation of HMG-CoA reductase.
HMG-CoA reductase has also been reported to be inactivated by oxidation
(17, 18). We hypothesized SR-12813 might oxidize HMG-CoA reductase and
that dithiothreitol, which is a standard constituent of the HMG-CoA
reductase activity assay, might protect the reductase from oxidation.
No inactivation of HR 58 reductase activity by SR-12813 was observed
under nonreducing conditions when dithiothreitol was omitted from the
assay.3
LDL receptor activity and
HMG-CoA reductase activity are co-ordinately regulated in Hep G2 cells
(24, 35). We therefore investigated the effect of SR-12813 on LDL
receptor activity by measuring the receptor-mediated association of
125I-LDL with the cells over a period of 2.5 h.
Lovastatin was used as a positive control (35, 36). In overnight
incubations both lovastatin and SR-12813 enhanced the receptor-mediated
association of iodinated LDL with Hep G2 cells (Table
I). This was not the result of a decreased catabolism of
LDL because LDL receptor-mediated degradation of 125I-LDL
was also increased (Table I) in the presence of lovastatin or SR-12813.
This result shows that the suppression of HMG-CoA reductase activity by
SR-12813 results in an increase of LDL receptor activity.
Effect of SR-12813 on LDL receptor activity in Hep G2 cells
The increase in LDL receptor activity might result
from regulation at the transcriptional level. Similarly HMG-CoA
reductase expression might be regulated by SR-12813. We studied the
effect of SR-12813 on mRNA content of HMG-CoA reductase and LDL
receptor. The HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor lovastatin that is known to
increase mRNA levels of HMG-CoA reductase and LDL receptor (35) was
used as a positive control. After a 21-h incubation with SR-12813 or
lovastatin, mRNA content of both of these proteins were increased
(Fig. 4) in comparison with the housekeeping gene,
glyceraldehyde-diphosphate dehydrogenase. There were no short term
effects (1-4 h) on expression of mRNA of either protein (not
shown). It is concluded that SR-12813 modulates LDL receptor and
HMG-CoA reductase at the transcriptional level in a way similar to
lovastatin.
Fig. 4. SR-12813 induces both LDL receptor and HMG-CoA reductase mRNA in Hep G2 cells. Hep G2 cells were incubated for 21 h with either 1 µM lovastatin or 3 µM SR-12813 in 5% LPDS medium. mRNA was isolated and analyzed by Northern blotting as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Blots were hybridized with 32P-labeled cDNA probes for LDL receptor and HMG-CoA reductase and the autoradiograph analyzed by densitometry (top panel). HMG-CoA reductase mRNA (4.4 kilobases): lane 1, control; lane 2, 3 µM SR-12813; lane 3, 1 µM lovastatin. LDL receptor mRNA (5.3 kilobases): lane 4, control; lane 5, 3 µM SR-12813; lane 6, 1 µM lovastatin. The blots were also hybridized with glyceraldehyde-diphosphate dehydrogenase (middle panel, 1.9 kilobases). The data in the table are expressed as means ± standard error normalized to glyceraldehyde-diphosphate dehydrogenase mRNA over three independent experiments. Post-transcriptional Regulation The rapid suppression of
HMG-CoA reductase activity by SR-12813 suggests the involvement of a
post-transcriptional mechanism. We measured the effect of 5 µM SR-12813 on HMG-CoA reductase protein levels in time
by Western blot analysis. To facilitate analysis, HMG-CoA reductase
levels were induced severalfold by pre-incubation of the cells
overnight with 0.1 µM lovastatin (Fig. 5).
Under these conditions, SR-12813 was still able to reduce HMG-CoA
reductase activity, although suppression of the reductase activity now
had a T1/2 of about 30 min compared with 10 min
without lovastatin (Fig. 6). Fig. 5 shows the decay of
the HMG-CoA reductase protein levels with time as measured by
densitometric analysis of the area corresponding to the 98-kDa band.
The T1/2 of HMG-CoA reductase protein reduction
appears to be slightly longer (1 h) than that found for suppression of
enzyme activity in the presence of lovastatin (30 min, Fig. 6). Without
lovastatin HMG-CoA reductase protein levels were reduced about 4-fold
in the presence of SR-12813 (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5. Effect of SR-12813 on protein levels of HMG-CoA reductase. Hep G2 cells were incubated overnight in 5% LPDS medium with or without 0.1 µM lovastatin. Cells were then incubated with 5 µM SR-12813 for the time indicated. Reactions were terminated by the addition of ice-cold buffer. Assay of HMG-CoA reductase protein was conducted by immunoblot analysis as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' An autoradiograph is shown with a table indicating the contents of lanes and the relative strength of the 98-kDa HMG-CoA reductase band as measured by densitometric analysis. Fig. 6. Effect of SR-12813 on HMG-CoA reductase activity in the presence of lovastatin. Confluent Hep G2 cells were pre-incubated overnight in 5% LPDS medium and 100 nM lovastatin. After 16 h of incubation, 5 µM SR-12813 was added for the indicated time. The reaction was then terminated, and HMG-CoA reductase activity was determined. HMG-CoA reductase activity after lovastatin was 230 pmol/min/mg, which was 5-fold increased over controls without lovastatin. The values are shown as the averages of triplicates ± S.D. The curve was drawn using a four parameter free fit, which gave a T1/2 of suppression of reductase activity of 33 min. When fitted as a single exponential decay a T1/2 of 30 min was obtained, but this fit was not as good.
Further experiments were performed in order to establish if this decrease in protein levels by SR-12813 was a result of an enhanced degradation or a decreased synthesis. Pulse-chase experiments were conducted with methionine. The chase was in the presence of 5 µM SR-12813. The anti-HR 53 immune precipitates were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Densitometric analysis of the 98-kDa band on the fluorograph revealed that the rate of HMG-CoA reductase degradation was enhanced more than 4-fold (Fig. 7) in the presence of SR-12813. The apparent half-life of HMG-CoA reductase was reduced from 90 to 20 min. No change was detected in the rate of total protein degradation as was measured by trichloroacetic acid precipitation of the cell lysate (T1/2 of 3.2 and 2.9 h in controls versus treated, respectively). Effects on HMG-CoA reductase synthesis were also investigated. SR-12813 (5 µM) apparently halved the incorporation of [35S]methionine into HMG-CoA reductase over a period of 30 min (not shown). This effect can be fully explained by the rapid degradation of newly synthesized enzyme. The 51% reduction of synthetic rate after 30 min corresponds to a T1/2 for reductase degradation of 29 min following the equation,
Fig. 7. Effect of SR-12813 on the degradation of HMG-CoA reductase. Hep G2 cells were incubated overnight in 5% LPDS medium, and the medium was replaced with methionine-free medium 15 min before the addition of [35S]methionine for 1 h. Cells were chased with 2 mM methionine in the presence or without SR-12813 and samples taken for immunoprecipitation and SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis fluorography analysis at the times indicated as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The relative radioactivity values of the HMG-CoA reductase 98-kDa band, quantitated by densitometry, were plotted as a function of chase time for control ( ) and SR-12813-treated cells ( ). Lines were fitted
by single exponential decay. The average turnover of cell protein was
determined by trichloroacetic acid precipitation of aliquots of the
cell lysate and counting the radioactivity in the precipitate. The
relative radioactivity levels in controls and SR-12813-treated cells
were fitted against time using single exponential decay (dashed
line and dotted line for nontreated and treated,
respectively). NI represents the immunoprecipitation by a
nonimmune rabbit serum at the start of the chase.
Comparison with Known HMG-CoA Reductase Suppressors We
compared the properties of SR-12813 with those of known suppressors of
HMG-CoA reductase activity, the oxysterol 25-hydroxycholesterol and
the oxylanosterol SK&F 104976 (14). The effects on HMG-CoA reductase
activity and degradation were studied. Fig. 8 shows that
the suppression of HMG-CoA reductase activity by SR-12813 was rapid
(T1/2 = 8.5 min) compared with 25-hydroxycholesterol
(T1/2 = 30 min) and SK&F 104976 (T1/2 = 141 min). As was predictable from the
effects on enzyme activity, the increase in the rate of degradation of
the reductase is much greater for the bisphosphonate than for the
oxysterols (Table II). For both activity and degradation
there was a lag time of 20-30 min before any effects of
25-hydroxycholesterol were observed. The above results suggest that
SR-12813 increases HMG-CoA reductase degradation via a mechanism
different from both oxysterol classes.
Fig. 8. Effect of oxysterols on HMG-CoA reductase activity. Hep G2 cells were incubated in the presence of 5 µM SR-12813 ( ), 5 µM
25-hydroxycholesterol ( ), or 100 nM SK&F 104976 ( )
for the times indicated. HMG-CoA reductase activity was determined as
described in the legend to Fig. 3. Points represent triplicates ± S.D. Apparent T1/2 values for reductase suppression
were calculated by a single exponential fit (SR-12813, 8.5 min; SK&F
104976, 141 min) or four parameter analysis (25-hydroxycholesterol, 33 min).
It is well known that mevalonate-derived metabolites play an important part in HMG-CoA reductase degradation (7). We tested the hypothesis that SR-12813 might promote the formation of these mevalonate-derived regulatory molecules. Incubation with high concentrations of lovastatin should deplete the cell from mevalonate and thus would inhibit the effects of SR-12813. Inclusion of 50 µM lovastatin in the medium during the methionine-free preincubation, pulse, and chase periods resulted in a 10-fold increase in T1/2 for HMG-CoA reductase degradation (Table II). This suggests that lovastatin strongly inhibited mevalonate-driven HMG-CoA reductase degradation. In contrast, this increase in half-life was not found when lovastatin was added during the chase period only (Table II). Despite the presence of lovastatin, SR-12813 increased the rate of degradation of HMG-CoA reductase, suggesting that this compound acts independently from mevalonate-derived metabolites. The same independence of mevalonate was observed for 25-hydroxycholesterol-mediated reductase degradation. Our results clearly demonstrate that SR-12813 inhibits cholesterol synthesis at the level of HMG-CoA reductase. Pulse-chase experiments with methionine showed that the reduction of cholesterol synthesis resulted from a 4-fold increase in rate of HMG-CoA reductase degradation. The also observed decrease in HMG-CoA reductase synthesis may be fully explained by this enhanced degradation and is supported by the lack of decrease in mRNA levels for up to 4 h in the presence of SR-12813. However, it should be noted that SR-12813-mediated degradation of HMG-CoA reductase was so fast that it was difficult to make an accurate assessment of its effects on synthesis. Therefore we cannot completely exclude that SR-12813 may also reduce HMG-CoA reductase synthesis to some degree. Overnight exposure of Hep G2 cells with SR-12813 did result in an increase of both LDL receptor and HMG-CoA reductase mRNA. This is similar to effects of lovastatin in Hep G2 cells described by other authors (35). The explanation is that the decrease in cellular cholesterol biosynthesis causes a co-ordinate regulated increase of gene expression of LDL receptor and HMG-CoA reductase. The resulting increase of LDL receptor activity by SR-12813 is likely to be an important contributor to the strong hypocholesterolemic effect of this class of bisphosphonates (1, 37). Collectively, our data support the premise that SR-12813 regulates HMG-CoA reductase mainly through an enhanced degradation. Degradation of HMG-CoA reductase by SR-12813 (T1/2 = 20 min; Fig. 7) may be preceeded by the rapid inactivation of the protein activity (T1/2 = 10 min, Fig. 3B), as was also suggested for 25-hydroxycholesterol by other authors (19). A rapid inactivation of the reductase might occur by phosphorylation (38) or by oxidation (17, 18), which might lead to an enhanced degradation (39). HMG-CoA reductase and acetyl-CoA carboxylase are both inactivated by phosphorylation via AMP kinase (16). Our data suggest that phosphorylation is not involved in the mode of action of SR-12813. Firstly, the incorporation of tritiated water into fatty acids (Fig. 2A) would have been suppressed by SR-12813 if AMP kinase-mediated phosphorylation was involved. Secondly, dephosphorylation by substitution of chloride (total activity) for fluoride (expressed activity) in the HMG-CoA reductase activity assay did not abolish the effect of SR-12813 (Fig. 3B). It is also unlikely that SR-12813 enhances oxidation of HMG-CoA reductase because firstly SR-12813 does not inactivate the reductase activity of HR 58 when dithiothreitol is omitted from the activity assay,3 and secondly SR-12813 belongs to a compound class that has anti-oxidant activity (40). The underlying mechanism for triggering rapid degradation of HMG-CoA reductase is still unresolved in the literature. Both mevalonate-derived metabolites and sterols can induce HMG-CoA reductase degradation (7, 8). The requirement of mevalonate in HMG-CoA reductase degradation has been shown by eliminating mevalonate synthesis using a high concentration of lovastatin (7). We assume that in our experiments very low intracellular levels of mevalonate were established by incubating the cells with 50 µM lovastatin during the preincubation and [35S]methionine pulse, because this resulted in a 10-fold increase of the T1/2 for HMG-CoA reductase degradation (Table II). Some authors have implied that lovastatin itself prevents HMG-CoA reductase degradation (41). Against this argument is our finding that when lovastatin is added only during the methionine chase, the T1/2 of reductase degradation was not increased (Table II). One might expect that addition of lovastatin during the chase would decrease levels of mevalonate-derived HMG-CoA reductase suppressors, followed by a consequential increase of the T1/2 for reductase degradation. However, it has been shown that mevalonate-induced degradation of HMG-CoA reductase that is already initiated is not affected by the removal of mevalonate (42), which supports our finding that there is no effect on the T1/2 of reductase degradation when lovastatin is added only during the chase. Therefore we conclude that our data are consistent with an elimination of mevalonate-derived activators of HMG-CoA reductase degradation in the presence of high concentration of lovastatin. Under these conditions SR-12813 was still able to accelerate HMG-CoA reductase degradation (Table II), implying that mevalonate is not an essential requirement for SR-12813-mediated HMG-CoA reductase degradation. We found the same for 25-hydroxycholesterol (Table II). Other authors found that mevalonate is required to allow sterol-mediated HMG-CoA reductase degradation (7, 42). This discrepancy might be due to differences between the CHO and Hep G2 cell lineages similar to those observed between CHO and C100 cells (43). Another class of compounds that may operate by a related mechanism is
formed by the tocotrienols (44). Similarly to SR-12813, In preliminary experiments we observed that SR-12813-mediated inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase activity was attenuated by the Calpain inhibitor N-acetyl-Leu-Leu-norleucinal. This suggests that nonlysosomal Ca2+-dependent proteases are involved in SR-12813 mediated reductase degradation, similar to mevalonate and sterol-induced reductase degradation (47). Recently novel microsomal cysteine proteases ER 60 and ER 72 have been identified that are possibly involved in the degradation of HMG-CoA reductase (48). The involvement of cysteine proteases needs to be elaborated further in future studies. To conclude, HMG-CoA reductase is known to be regulated in the cell by a range of molecular mechanisms. In this paper we have shown that SR-12813 can regulate HMG-CoA reductase rapidly on the level of protein via an enhanced degradation. * The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. § To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 44-1438-782108; fax: 44-1438-782580. 1 The abbreviations used are: HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A; LPDS, lipoprotein-deficient serum; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; LDL, low density lipoprotein. 2 Poster on SR-12813 synthesis presented at the 13th International Symposium on Medicinal Chemistry, Paris (1994) by L. M. Nguyen et al. and also published as a European Patent Application EP 339237 by L. M. Nguyen et al. from Symphar S. A. Switz. 3 T. A. Berkhout, H. M. Simon, and K. E. Suckling, unpublished results. We thank Dr. Brian Knight and Dr. Ann Soutar from the Medical Research Council Lipoprotein Unit, Hammersmith Hospital, London, for hospitality and helpful discussions on LDL receptor and HMG-CoA reductase regulation.
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||