|
Volume 271, Number 26,
Issue of June 28, 1996
pp. 15803-15809
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Molecular Cloning and Expression of the Gene for Elastin-binding
Protein (ebpS) in Staphylococcus aureus*
(Received for publication, February 22, 1996)
Pyong Woo
Park
§,
Joel
Rosenbloom
,
William R.
Abrams
,
Joan
Rosenbloom
and
Robert P.
Mecham
¶
From the Departments of Cell Biology and
¶ Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St.
Louis, Missouri 63110 and the Department of Anatomy and Histology,
School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Interactions between staphylococci and components
of the extracellular matrix mediate attachment of the bacteria to host
tissues and organs and define an important mechanism leading to
colonization, invasion, and formation of metastatic abscesses. We have
previously demonstrated a specific binding interaction between
Staphylococcus aureus and elastin, one of the major protein
components of the extracellular matrix. Available evidence suggests
that this association is mediated by a 25-kDa elastin-binding protein
on the surface of S. aureus (EbpS). To study the molecular
structure and function of EbpS, the gene encoding EbpS was cloned,
sequenced, and expressed in Escherichia coli. DNA sequence
data indicate that the ebpS open reading frame consists of
606 base pairs and encodes a novel polypeptide with a predicted
molecular mass of 23,345 daltons and pI of 4.9. A polyclonal antibody
raised against recombinant EbpS interacted with the native 25-kDa cell
surface EbpS and inhibited staphylococcal elastin binding. Furthermore,
recombinant EbpS bound specifically to immobilized elastin and
inhibited binding of S. aureus to elastin. A degradation
product of recombinant EbpS lacking the first 59 amino acids of the
molecule and a C-terminal fragment of CNBr-cleaved recombinant EbpS,
however, did not interact with elastin. Together, these results confirm
that EbpS is the cell surface molecule mediating binding of S. aureus to elastin. The inability of truncated forms of
recombinant EbpS to bind to elastin suggests that the elastin binding
site in EbpS is contained in the first 59 amino acids of the
molecule.
INTRODUCTION
The extracellular matrix (ECM)1 is a
ubiquitous structure that contributes to the architecture, elasticity,
and rigidity of virtually all vertebrate tissues and organs. Within the
last several decades, additional biological activities of the ECM have
been identified. Distinct components of the ECM have been found to
mediate one or several cellular events such as adhesion, proliferation,
and regulation of gene expression (1, 2, 3, 4). These cell-ECM interactions,
in turn, direct many physiological and pathological processes including
development, wound healing, and tumor cell metastasis (5, 6, 7). It is now
known that cell surface ECM receptors are key mediators of these
biological events. Many ECM receptors belong to a family of dimeric
receptor complexes called integrins (8, 9), although nonintegrin ECM
receptors have been identified (10). In addition to eukaryotic cells,
various pathogenic bacteria also interact specifically with the host
ECM through cell surface ECM-binding molecules. ECM-binding molecules
of pathogenic bacteria belong to a group of proteins known collectively
as adhesins or microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix
molecules (MSCRAMMs) and are widely believed to play important roles in
key steps of disease pathogenesis (11, 12).
Among the many important pathogenic bacteria, few are as efficient in
developing multiple resistance to antibiotics and causing a wide
spectrum of diseases as Staphylococcus aureus. S. aureus is one of the causative agents of diseases such as
infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, aortitis, pneumonia, and scalded
skin syndrome (13, 14, 15). Furthermore, several strains of S. aureus tend to extravasate into the circulation to cause
bacteremia and subsequent formation of metastatic abscesses. These
properties imply that S. aureus is capable of interacting
with host tissue components. Consistent with this notion is the finding
that S. aureus binds specifically to major ECM components
such as collagen (16), fibronectin (17), laminin (18), proteoglycans
(19), and elastin (20). Importantly, there is increasing evidence
supporting a relationship between the ability of S. aureus
to bind to ECM and its pathogenicity. For example, most clinical
isolates of S. aureus demonstrate binding to fibronectin,
and mutant strains defective in fibronectin binding have a decreased
ability to colonize damaged heart valves in animal models of
endocarditis (21). S. aureus binding to collagen has been
implicated in osteomyelitis and septic arthritis (22), in which
expression of the collagen adhesin has been found to be both necessary
and sufficient for bacterial attachment to the type II collagen-rich
cartilage. It has also been demonstrated in a murine experimental
septic arthritis model that greater than 70% of animals injected with
collagen adhesin-positive strains developed septic arthritis, whereas
less than 25% of animals challenged with isogenic mutant strains
lacking the collagen adhesin developed clinical symptoms of the disease
(23). In addition, invasive S. aureus interacts with the
basement membrane component laminin, whereas noninvasive
Staphylococcus epidermidis shows no binding (18). Taken
together, these observations indicate that S. aureus-ECM
interactions are playing critical roles in targeting host tissues for
attachment, colonization, and invasion.
Elastin is an important structural protein whose primary physiological
role is to confer the property of reversible elasticity to tissues and
organs (24). Elastin expression is highest in the lung, skin, and blood
vessels, but elastin is widely expressed at lower levels in most
mammalian tissues. In a previous study we showed that S. aureus binds to elastin with properties of reversibility,
saturability, and specificity that suggested the presence of an
elastin-binding protein on the bacterial surface (20). Using affinity
chromatography techniques we were able to isolate a 25-kDa cell surface
elastin-binding protein (named EbpS for
lastin- inding rotein of
aureus) that has been proposed to facilitate
binding of the bacteria to elastin-rich host ECM. EbpS is structurally
distinct from the mammalian cell surface elastin-binding protein and
exhibits different binding specificity in terms of sequence
recognition. Whereas the mammalian elastin-binding protein recognizes
the hexapeptide sequence VGVAPG located in the C-terminal half of
elastin (25), EbpS binds to a region in the N-terminal one-third of the
molecule. In this study, we report the cloning, sequencing, and
expression of ebpS. Our results confirm that EbpS is the
cell surface molecule mediating binding of S. aureus cells
to elastin and that EbpS is a novel protein. Characterization of
elastin binding activity by various constructs of EbpS suggests that
the N-terminal 59 amino acids of the molecule play an important role in
elastin recognition.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
Restriction endonucleases, calf intestinal
alkaline phosphatase, T4 DNA ligase, T4 polynucleotide kinase,
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside,
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- -D-galactoside, Wizard
Miniprep plasmid purification kits, and HindIII-digested DNA markers were purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). DNase-free RNase
was obtained from Boehringer Mannheim. Luria-Bertani (LB) medium and LB
agar medium capsules were from BIO 101 (La Jolla, CA). Tryptic soy
broth (TSB) was obtained from Remel (Lenexa, KS). Na125I,
[ -32P]ATP, and [ -32P]CTP were from
ICN (Costa Mesa, CA). Papain and protein A, immobilized to cross-linked
agarose, and IODO-GEN were purchased from Pierce. Rapid-hyb buffer and
Rediprime DNA labeling system were obtained from Amersham Corp. Chroma
Spin-10 columns were purchased from Clontech (Palo Alto, CA).
QIAexpress vector kit type IV and the Midi-Prep plasmid purification
kit were obtained from Qiagen (Chatsworth, CA). Affi-Gel 10 affinity
support was from Bio-Rad (Melville, NY). All other materials were
purchased from Sigma.
Bacteria, Plasmids, and Culture Conditions
S.
aureus strain 12598 (Cowan) was purchased from the American Type
Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Escherichia coli strains
DH5 (MAX Efficiency) and M15 (pREP4) were from Life Technologies,
Inc. and Qiagen, respectively. M15 cells contain the plasmid pREP4,
which constitutively expresses the Lac repressor from the
lacI gene. S. aureus cells were grown in TSB, and
E. coli strains were grown in LB media supplemented with
appropriate antibiotics as described below.
The low copy number cloning plasmid, pHSG575 (26), was kindly provided
by Dr. Michael Caparon (Department of Molecular Microbiology,
Washington University School of Medicine). The plasmid pBluescript
KS+ was purchased from Stratagene (La Jolla, CA) and used
for subcloning and sequencing purposes. The expression plasmid pQE-30
was obtained from Qiagen. All of these plasmids were propagated in
DH5 cells and purified using the Qiagen Plasmid Midi-Prep kit for
further applications.
Isolation of S. aureus Genomic DNA, Preparation of Probes, and
Southern Blotting
High molecular weight genomic DNA was isolated
from 400 ml of an overnight culture of S. aureus strain
12598 cells by lysostaphin lysis, followed by treatment with DNase-free
RNase and subsequent purification by phenol/chloroform and chloroform
extractions. After the final chloroform extraction, DNA in the aqueous
layer was precipitated with ethanol and dried.
A degenerate 30-mer oligonucleotide probe corresponding to the amino
acid sequence NNFKDDFEKN was generated by chemical synthesis. The
oligonucleotide was end-labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase and
[ -32P]ATP, and the radiolabeled oligonucleotide was
separated from unincorporated 32P by Chroma Spin-10 spin
chromatography. The specific activity was approximately 5 × 108 cpm/µg of oligonucleotide. The 2.6-kb
HindIII/HincII probe was generated as described
below and radiolabeled with [ -32P]CTP using the
Rediprime DNA labeling system.
Genomic and plasmid DNAs were digested to completion with restriction
endonucleases. Restriction endonuclease-cleaved DNAs were separated by
TAE-agarose gel electrophoresis and Southern blotted to nitrocellulose
membranes. The membranes were baked at 80 °C for 2 h under
vacuum, and prehybridization, hybridization, and washing of the
membranes were performed according to instructions supplied with the
Rapid-hyb buffer. Washed blots were air-dried and exposed to Kodak
XAR-5 films at 70 °C with intensifying screens for 0.5-2
days.
Cloning and Sequencing of ebpS
Based on the observation
that the 30-mer oligonucleotide probe hybridized to a single 4.2-kb
EcoRI-genomic DNA fragment (Fig. 1, lane A), a
size-selected genomic library in the 4.2-kb region was generated.
Genomic DNA from S. aureus strain 12598 was digested with
EcoRI and fractionated by 1% low melting agarose
electrophoresis. The 4.2-kb region was excised from the gel and melted
at 68 °C for 15 min. DNA in the melted agarose was ligated in
situ with pHSG575 treated with EcoRI and alkaline
phosphatase according to instructions provided by FMC Products.
Competent DH5 cells were transformed with the ligated material, and
different dilutions were plated out on LB agar medium plates
supplemented with chloramphenicol (20 µg/ml),
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside (0.5 mM),
and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- -D-galactoside (40 µg/ml) for antibiotic and blue/white selections. White colonies were
collected and propagated overnight, and the Wizard plasmid Mini-prep
was used to isolate plasmid DNA from cells. Purified plasmids were
digested with EcoRI and screened by Southern blotting using
the radiolabeled oligonucleotide probe.
Fig. 1.
Southern analysis of genomic DNA from
S. aureus. Genomic DNA isolated from S. aureus strain 12598 was digested with EcoRI
(lanes A and C) or
EcoRI/HindIII/HincII (lane
D). Lane B shows pEBPS-1 digested with
EcoRI. Samples were fractionated by 1% TAE-agarose
electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose. The membranes were
hybridized to a degenerate oligonucleotide (lanes A and
B) or to the 2.6-kb HindIII/HincII
insert of pKS-2.6 (lanes C and D). Sizes of the
hybridized fragments were determined from the migration pattern of
HindIII-digested DNA markers.
The cloned 4.2-kb fragment was digested with HindIII and
HincII, yielding a 2.6-kb fragment, which was subcloned into
pBluescript KS+ and pUC19. The 2.6-kb fragment was also
used as a probe in Southern analyses with S. aureus genomic
DNA. The insert was digested using the ExoIII/mung bean
nuclease system (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) to generate two sets of
nested deletions. Multiple clones covering both strands in their
entirety were sequenced by the Sanger dideoxynucleotide chain
termination method as modified for Taq polymerase cycle
sequencing using an ABI 373A automated DNA sequencer. Sequence data
were assembled and discrepancies resolved using the Wisconsin Package
(Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI). The primary sequence of
ebpS as shown in Fig. 2 has been assigned the
GenBankTM .
Fig. 2.
Primary sequence of ebpS.
Nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences are numbered starting at
the first nucleotide of the open reading frame and translation
initiation codon, respectively. The putative 35 and 10 hexamers and
ribosomal binding site are indicated. The experimentally determined
N-terminal sequence of cell surface EbpS is shown in boldface
lettering, and the experimentally determined amino acid sequences
of rEbpS are underlined. The in frame termination codon is
indicated by an asterisk.
Expression of ebpS in E. coli and CNBr Cleavage of Recombinant
EbpS
A 2.6-kb HindIII/HincII fragment in
pBluescript KS+ (30 ng) served as the template, and PCR
reactions were performed with a Perkin-Elmer thermocycler using
standard reagents. The open reading frame of ebpS was
PCR-amplified using the sense oligonucleotide,
5 -TGT ATAGAAAGGAAGGTGGCTGTG-3 ,
and the antisense oligonucleotide,
5 -GCA GCTGTACCAGCACCAATT-3 . The sense
oligonucleotide contained a BamHI site (underlined), and A
of the two ATG codons was changed to G (in boldface lettering) to avoid
internal initiation of translation as recommended by Qiagen. The
antisense oligonucleotide contained a HindIII cleavage site
(underlined). The exact conditions for amplification were 94 °C for
1 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for
30 s, and 72 °C for 60 s. The PCR product was digested
with BamHI and HindIII and gel-purified. This
material was ligated to pQE-30 that had been digested with
BamHI and HindIII and treated with calf
intestinal alkaline phosphatase. Competent M15 cells were transformed
with the ligation product and selected by ampicillin (100 µg/ml) and
kanamycin (20 µg/ml), and antibiotic-resistant cells were screened
for recombinant protein expression. After obtaining several positive
clones, ideal conditions for maximum expression were examined.
Based on results from these studies, the following protocol was used
routinely for medium scale purification of recombinant EbpS (rEbpS). A
stock culture of the clone was grown overnight in 10 ml of LB media
supplemented with ampicillin and kanamycin. On the following day, this
culture was added to 100 ml of fresh LB media with antibiotics. Cells
were allowed to regrow until the A600 value
reached 0.8 (~3 h). Expression was then induced with 1 mM
isopropyl- -D-thiogalactopyranoside for 4 h at
37 °C. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation (5000 × g), resuspended in 15 ml of buffer A (8 M urea,
100 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8), and vortexed gently for 15 min. The lysed cells were
centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the
supernatant was transferred to a tube containing 4 ml of nickel
nitriloacetic acid resin (Ni2+-NTA) pre-equilibrated with
buffer A. The mixture was incubated for 30 min at room temperature with
gentle agitation, transferred to a disposable polypropylene column, and
washed consecutively with 100 ml of buffer A and 100 ml of buffer B
(same as buffer A except pH 6). The tightly bound recombinant protein
was eluted with 10 ml of buffer C (same as buffer A, but pH 4). The
eluted material was dialyzed twice against 4 liters of 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, and the concentration of protein in
the dialysate was determined by UV spectrophotometry based on the
number of Tyr and Trp residues in rEbpS (1 × A280 = 2.68 mg/ml). The yield of purified rEbpS
under these conditions was approximately 5 mg/100 ml of induced
culture.
To generate CNBr-cleaved fragments, 500 µg of rEbpS was incubated in
the dark for 24 h at room temperature with 1 mg of CNBr in 200 µl of 70% formic acid. At the end of incubation, the sample was
diluted with 14 ml of deionized H2O and Speed-vac dried.
The dried material was resuspended in 10 ml of deionized
H2O and redried in 100-µg aliquots.
Generation of Rabbit Anti-rEbpS Polyclonal
Antibodies
Preimmune sera were collected, and New England White
rabbits were injected with 1 ml of purified rEbpS (20 µg) mixed 1:1
with complete Freund's adjuvant. Booster injections (20 µg) mixed
1:1 with incomplete Freund's adjuvant were given at 5, 7, 10, 14, and
19 weeks. Sera were tested by Western immunoblotting using rEbpS.
IgG fractions were purified from immune and preimmune sera by either
caprylic acid precipitation (27) or protein A affinity chromatography.
For generation of an antibody affinity resin, approximately 100 mg of
anti-rEbpS IgG were covalently coupled to 5 ml of Affi-Gel 10 according
to the manufacturer's instructions. To generate anti-rEbpS Fab
fragments, 50 mg of lyophilized IgG was reacted overnight at 37 °C
with 2 ml of immobilized papain in 5 ml of papain digestion buffer (20 mM NaH2PO4, 20 mM
cysteine-HCl, 10 mM EDTA, pH 6.5). Fab fragments were
separated from undigested IgGs and free Fc fragments by protein A
affinity chromatography.
Binding of Radiolabeled rEbpS Constructs to Immobilized Elastin
Peptides
Preparation and coupling of elastin peptides to Affi-Gel
10 were as described previously (20). Both rEbpS (20 µg) and
CNBr-cleaved rEbpS (80 µg) were iodinated with 300 µCi of
Na125I by the IODO-GEN method. The specific activities were
approximately 2.3 × 104 and 1.2 × 104 cpm/ng
protein for rEbpS and CNBr-cleaved rEbpS fragments, respectively.
Radiolabeled rEbpS (45 ng) in 1.5 ml of binding buffer (50 mM Tris, 500 mM NaCl, 2 mM
CaCl2, 0.1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin, pH 7.5) was
incubated with 1 ml of the elastin peptide affinity resin for 2 h
at room temperature in the absence or presence of 2 mg of unlabeled
elastin peptides. The mixture was transferred to disposable
polypropylene columns and washed with binding buffer by gravity flow
until radioactivity of the flow-through reached background. Bound rEbpS
was eluted with 3 ml of 1% SDS buffer, spin-concentrated, and analyzed
by 10% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. Binding of radiolabeled
CNBr-cleaved rEbpS to immobilized elastin was assessed similarly,
except 80 ng of the starting material was used, and bound material was
visualized by 12% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography.
Detection of the Native 25-kDa Cell Surface-labeled EbpS with
Anti-rEbpS Antibodies
Surface-labeled extracts from S. aureus cells were prepared by lysostaphin digestion as described
previously (20). Approximately 107 cpm of surface-labeled
extract was first absorbed with 3 ml of pig IgG-Affi-Gel 10 resin for
2 h at room temperature. The unbound supernatant was collected and
incubated with 1 ml of the anti-rEbpS IgG affinity resin in the absence
or presence of 2 mg of unlabeled rEbpS for 2 h at room temperature
in 2 ml of binding buffer. The mixtures were transferred to disposable
columns and washed with binding buffer until flow-through reached
background radioactive levels. Bound cell surface-labeled molecules
were eluted from the column by 3 ml of 1% SDS buffer,
spin-concentrated, and analyzed by 15% SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography.
Other Procedures
Purification and radiolabeling of
full-length recombinant human elastin and cellular elastin binding
assays were performed as described previously (20). Automated amino
acid sequence and composition analyses were carried out in our
laboratory with the Applied Biosystems 473A protein sequencer and
Beckman System 6300 High Performance Analyzer, respectively. Electron
spray mass spectrometry was performed by the Protein Chemistry
Laboratory at Washington University School of Medicine (St. Louis,
MO).
RESULTS
Cloning of ebpS
The N-terminal sequence of native EbpS
expressed on the cell surface of S. aureus was previously
determined to be ANNFKDDFEKNRQ (20). A degenerate oligonucleotide
corresponding to residues 2-11 of this N-terminal sequence was
generated and used as a probe. Southern blot analysis was first
performed with S. aureus strain 12598 genomic DNA digested
with restriction endonucleases to identify the genomic fragment
containing ebpS. As shown in Fig. 1, the
oligonucleotide probe hybridized to a 4.2-kb EcoRI fragment
(lane A). On the basis of this observation, a size-selected
genomic plasmid library in the 4.2-kb region was constructed from
EcoRI-digested S. aureus genomic DNA and was
screened with the oligonucleotide probe by Southern blotting. Of 120 colonies screened, two positive clones with identical restriction
enzyme digestion patterns were isolated. One of these clones, pEBPS-1,
was used for further analysis.
To verify that the correct 4.2-kb fragment was selected, the
radiolabeled oligonucleotide was hybridized to the pEBPS-1 insert, and
the cloned insert itself was used as a probe for Southern analyses with
EcoRI- and
EcoRI/HindIII/HincIIdigested
genomic DNA. The oligonucleotide probe hybridized to the 4.2-kb pEBPS-1
insert (Fig. 1, lane B), and the insert recognized a 4.2-kb
EcoRI genomic fragment (Fig. 1, lane C). With
EcoRI/HindIII/HincII-digested genomic
DNA, the radiolabeled pEBPS-1 insert hybridized to a 2.6-kb fragment
(Fig. 1 lane D). The oligonucleotide and cloned insert
probes consistently detected single fragments of identical size in
Southern analyses using genomic DNA digested with various restriction
endonucleases, indicating that ebpS is present as a single
copy gene.
Analysis of the Primary Sequence of ebpS
pEBPS-1 was digested
with HindIII and HincII to yield a 2.6-kb
fragment. This fragment was subcloned into pBluescript II
KS+ to generate pKS-2.6 and was sequenced. A 606-base pair
open reading frame that starts with an ATG codon was identified about
1.2-kb 3 of the HindIII site. The primary sequence of the
open reading frame with up- and downstream sequences is shown in Fig.
2. Putative 10 and 35 hexamers were identified at
positions 31 and 54, with a spacing of 17 base pairs. A third
A/T-rich promoter sequence has been proposed recently to exist in a
region about 20 base pairs upstream of the 35 hexamer in E. coli (28), and this region for ebpS was 75% A/T. A
potential ribosome binding sequence, which complemented perfectly the
extreme 3 region of Bacillus subtilis 16 S RNA (UCUUUCCUCC)
(29), was found at position 7. Overall, ebpS was 64% A/T
and 36% C/G. Although two ATG codons were found in the correct reading
frame of ebpS, we have designated the second ATG as the
initiation codon based on the location of the putative ribosome binding
site. The N-terminal sequence of cell surface EbpS determined from
peptide sequencing was found to start at the second residue of the
predicted sequence, suggesting that the initial Met residue is cleaved.
The deduced sequence matched perfectly with the determined sequence of
cell surface EbpS except for the first amino acid (Ala in native, Ser
in deduced). Because Ser residues produce a small peak in peptide
sequencing chromatograms and are often misread, we reexamined the
original sequencing chromatogram of cell surface EbpS and have
identified clear Ser and Ser peaks, indicating that the residue is
indeed a Ser and not Ala.
The mature protein has a predicted molecular mass of 23,344.7 daltons
and an acidic pI of 4.9. Accordingly, the protein has a preponderance
of acidic amino acids Asp (10.9%) and Glu (11.9%) and is devoid of
Cys residues. Garnier analysis predicted a secondary structure that is
58.4% -helical and 23.8% coiled-coil. The BLAST network service of
the National Institutes of Health was used to search for sequence
homologies. The December 1, 1995 releases of the Brookhaven Protein
Data Bank, GenBankTM, EMBL Data Library, and SWISS-PROT
protein sequence data base and the translated coding sequence of
GenBankTM were used for comparison. No significant
homologies were found between reported sequences in these data bases
and the primary sequence of ebpS.
Expression of ebpS in E. coli
We studied whether the cloned
gene encodes an elastin-binding protein by expressing ebpS
in E. coli. The PCR-amplified ebpS open reading
frame was expressed in E. coli as a fusion protein
containing six His residues attached to the N terminus. Recombinant
EbpS (rEbpS) was purified from E. coli extracts by
Ni2+-NTA chromatography based on the high affinity binding
interaction between Ni2+ and His residues. As can be seen
in Fig. 3, the three positive clones expressed large
amounts of homogeneous rEbpS. Interestingly, purified rEbpS from all
three clones migrated as a 45-kDa protein when fractionated on reducing
SDS-PAGE, which was a significant deviation from its predicted
molecular mass of 26 kDa.
Fig. 3.
Expression of ebpS in E. coli. The ebpS open reading frame was
PCR-amplified and expressed in E. coli as a fusion protein
with polyhistidine residues attached to the N terminus. rEbpS purified
from three different positive clones by Ni2+-NTA affinity
chromatography was fractionated by 10% SDS-PAGE and stained with
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (lanes B-D). The migration
pattern of the size standard is shown in lane A.
To evaluate the integrity of rEbpS, the N-terminal sequence of
full-length rEbpS, as well as internal sequences from a degradation
product and two fragments generated by CNBr cleavage, were determined
by protein microsequencing. Altogether, unambiguous sequences were
obtained for 58 residues, and they matched perfectly with the predicted
sequences (Fig. 2, underlined sequences). Furthermore, amino
acid and mass spectrometry analyses indicated that the composition of
rEbpS and actual molecular mass of rEbpS agree with the predicted data.
These results indicate that the correct protein has been expressed and
that overestimation of the molecular mass is due to aberrant migration
in SDS-PAGE.
Elastin Binding Activities of rEbpS Constructs
To investigate
whether rEbpS interacts specifically with elastin, elastin peptide
affinity chromatography was performed with radiolabeled rEbpS.
Iodinated rEbpS was incubated with the elastin peptide affinity resin
for 2 h at room temperature in the absence or presence of excess
unlabeled elastin peptides. The mixture was then washed extensively
with buffer until radioactivity in the wash reached background levels.
Bound material was eluted with 1% SDS buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE
and autoradiography. The starting material for this experiment had been
stored for 1 week at 4 °C after purification with
Ni2+-NTA chromatography and, as can be seen in Fig.
4, was partially degraded (lane B). This
turned out to be fortuitous, however, because it showed that
full-length rEbpS, but not the lower molecular weight degradation
products, bound to elastin (Fig. 4, lane C). Importantly,
binding of the full-length protein was inhibited by unlabeled elastin
peptides (lane D). Sequence analysis showed that the amino
terminus of the 40-kDa major degradation product began at position 60 (see Fig. 2). These results suggest that the first 59 amino acids in
EbpS play a critical role in elastin recognition.
Fig. 4.
rEbpS binds specifically to immobilized
elastin peptides. Approximately 106 cpm of
radiolabeled rEbpS were incubated with 1 ml of elastin peptide affinity
resin in the absence (lane C) or presence (lane
D) of 2 mg of unlabeled elastin peptides for 2 h at room
temperature. After thorough washing, bound proteins were eluted with
1% SDS buffer and analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE and autoradiography. The
starting material contained a 40-kDa degradation product in addition to
the intact 45-kDa rEbpS (lane B). Migration of
14C-labeled size standards is shown in lane
A.
To determine whether the N-terminal region of EbpS contains the elastin
binding site, elastin binding properties of CNBr-cleaved rEbpS
fragments were examined. EbpS contains a single internal Met residue at
position 125 such that cleavage with CNBr would generate two fragments.
In agreement with the predicted sequence, two dominant bands were
detected in CNBr-cleaved rEbpS. Peptide microsequencing was employed to
verify correct cleavage and to identify which band corresponded to the
N- and C-terminal fragments (Fig. 2, underlined). When
elastin binding activity of these fragments was assayed with elastin
peptide affinity chromatography, only the N-terminal fragment bound to
the elastin peptide affinity resin, supporting the conjecture that the
elastin binding site is contained in the first 59 amino acids of
EbpS.
Effects of rEbpS on S. aureus Binding to Elastin
If EbpS is
the cell surface molecule responsible for elastin binding at the
cellular level, then an active form of soluble EbpS should interfere
with S. aureus binding to elastin. This hypothesis was
tested by incubating radiolabeled elastin with S. aureus
cells in the absence or presence of various concentrations of unlabeled
rEbpS. As can be seen in Fig. 5, rEbpS inhibited binding
of labeled elastin in a concentration-dependent manner.
S. aureus binding to radiolabeled elastin was abrogated at
the highest concentration of rEbpS (19 µM). The control
polyhistidine fusion protein mouse dihydrofolate reductase did not
influence binding at 26 µM. These results demonstrate
that rEbpS inhibition of cellular elastin binding is specific and that
the polyhistidine domain of rEbpS does not affect elastin binding.
Fig. 5.
rEbpS specifically inhibits S. aureus binding to radiolabeled elastin. Radioiodinated
elastin (20 ng) was incubated with 2 × 108 live S. aureus cells in the absence or presence of increasing
concentrations of unlabeled rEbpS or 26 µM of mouse
dihydrofolate reductase for 1 h at room temperature in 200 µl of
TSB. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation, and the supernatant was
discarded. Pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of TSB, transferred to new
tubes, and washed two more times with TSB. Radioactivity associated
with cells is presented as mean percentage of binding ± S.D. of
triplicate determinations.
Expression of EbpS on the Cell Surface of S. aureus
The
ability of rEbpS to interact directly with elastin and to inhibit
cellular elastin binding strongly suggest that EbpS is the cell surface
protein mediating S. aureus binding to elastin. To provide
further evidence that EbpS is on the bacterial surface, affinity
chromatography was performed with surface-labeled S. aureus
extracts and immobilized anti-rEbpS IgG. S. aureus cells
were surface-labeled by the IODO-GEN method, and extracts were prepared
by lysostaphin digestion. Approximately 107 cpm of this
material was exposed to a porcine IgG affinity resin to remove
surface-labeled protein A, and the nonbound fraction was incubated with
the anti-rEbpS IgG affinity resin for 2 h at 25 °C. After
washing extensively with binding buffer, bound cell surface molecules
were eluted with 1% SDS buffer and were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography. As shown in Fig. 6, preabsorption with
the porcine IgG resin removed surface-labeled protein A from the
starting material (compare 50 kDa band in lanes A and
B). Of the remaining numerous surface-labeled proteins, a
35- and 25-kDa protein associated with the anti-rEbpS IgG affinity
resin (lane C). To determine the specificity of binding, the
same experiment was performed in the presence of excess unlabeled
rEbpS. Binding of the surface 25-kDa protein, but not the 35-kDa
protein, to immobilized anti-rEbpS IgG was inhibited by unlabeled rEbpS
(not shown). Densitometric scanning of the bands revealed that the band
intensity for the 25- and 35-kDa proteins decreased by 64 and 7%,
respectively, in the presence of excess unlabeled rEbpS. These results
indicate that the 25-kDa protein is cell surface EbpS and that the
35-kDa protein is interacting nonspecifically with the agarose affinity
support of the elastin peptide affinity resin.
Fig. 6.
Antibody to rEbpS recognizes EbpS on the
surface of S. aureus. Iodinated cell surface proteins
prepared by lysostaphin digestion of S. aureus (lane
A) and absorbed with porcine IgG-Affi-Gel 10 to remove protein A
(lane B, at 50 kDa marker) were incubated with 1 ml of
anti-rEbpS IgG affinity resin. Bound surface proteins were eluted with
1% SDS (lane C) and analyzed by 15% SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography. The band at 35 kDa in lane C interacts
nonspecifically with the affinity support.
To test whether antibodies to rEbpS would block binding to elastin,
S. aureus cells were incubated with radiolabeled elastin in
the absence or presence of immune or preimmune Fab fragments. As shown
in Fig. 7, Fab fragments from immune IgGs inhibited
binding of S. aureus to radiolabeled elastin in a
concentration-dependent manner. In contrast, Fab fragments
from preimmune antibodies had no effect on binding at the two
concentrations tested.
Fig. 7.
Fab fragments of anti-rEbpS IgG inhibit
S. aureus binding to elastin. Radiolabeled elastin was
incubated with live S. aureus cells in the absence or
presence of 6, 10, 20, 50, and 100 µg of immune rEbpS IgG Fab or 20 and 100 µg of preimmune Fab fragments for 1 h at room
temperature. Binding was quantified as described previously. Data are
presented as mean percentage of binding ± S.D. of triplicate
determinations.
DISCUSSION
Cell surface components of pathogenic bacteria play important
roles in facilitating the organism's survival in the hostile
environment of the host. For Gram-positive bacteria, these surface
molecules are used in pathogenic processes such as in evading host
immune responses (30), digesting host carbohydrates to expose host
attachment sites (31, 32), capturing host enzymes to digest host
tissues (33), and binding host tissue determinants to establish a firm
basis for colonization (34). Cell surface adhesins and MSCRAMMs
interact with host ECM components and participate in the colonization
of and extravasation through tissues and organs. We have demonstrated
previously that S. aureus binds specifically to elastin and
have identified a cell surface elastin-binding protein (EbpS) that
mediates the S. aureus-elastin interaction. On the basis of
these findings, EbpS has been proposed to be the elastin MSCRAMM.
Several independent criteria indicate that EbpS is the surface protein
mediating S. aureus binding to elastin. First, rEbpS binds
specifically to immobilized elastin and inhibits binding of S. aureus cells in a dose-dependent manner. These results
establish that EbpS is an elastin-binding protein that is functionally
active in a soluble form. Second, Fab fragments of an antibody raised
against rEbpS inhibit binding of S. aureus to elastin. This
suggests that the topology of EbpS is such that the elastin binding
site is accessible to interact with the ligand and is not embedded in
the cell wall or membrane domains. Third, immunochemical analysis found
that the antibody to rEbpS recognizes the native, 25-kDa protein
expressed on the surface of S. aureus cells.
Cloning and detailed characterization of ebpS show that it
exists as a single copy gene in the S. aureus genome. The
606-base pair gene encodes a protein with a predicted molecular mass of
23 kDa that is highly acidic at neutral pH. Expression of
ebpS in E. coli produces a protein of 26 kDa, as
determined by mass spectrometry, that migrates as a 45-kDa protein on
SDS-PAGE. The exact cause of this aberrant migration is unknown,
although anomalous migration in SDS-PAGE is frequently observed for
Gram-positive cell surface proteins and for polyhistidine fusion
proteins (35, 36, 37, 38, 39). In some cases, the anomalous behavior of
Gram-positive surface proteins on SDS-PAGE has been attributed to the
presence in the protein of multiple repetitive domains (35, 36) or to a
high proline content (37, 38). Other factors must account for the
abnormal migration of EbpS, however, since it contains no repetitive
domains and proline makes up only about 4% of the total amino acid
residues.
The aberrant migration of rEbpS on SDS-PAGE suggests an answer to a
question raised during our initial characterization of EbpS. In that
study, we found two forms of the protein: a functionally active 40-kDa
form of EbpS that was only detected intracellularly and the 25-kDa form
present on the cell surface. Our current findings suggest that
full-length, native EbpS, with a predicted size of 23 kDa, may be
migrating in SDS-PAGE as the 40-kDa intracellular precursor, and that
the 25-kDa surface form of EbpS is actually a smaller form of the
molecule processed at the C terminus. This conclusion is supported by
amino acid sequencing showing that both the 25- and 40-kDa proteins
have identical amino acid sequences over 20 residues at their amino
terminus, by the presence of a single gene for EbpS in the S. aureus genome, and by the observation that the 26-kDa rEbpS
migrates anomalously as a 45-kDa protein on SDS-PAGE. The significance
of C-terminal processing of EbpS is unknown. One possibility, however,
is that the processing event may be important for targeting EbpS to the
cell surface. Because EbpS lacks an N-terminal signal peptide and other
known sorting and anchoring signals, this proposed intracellular
processing event may facilitate surface targeting. In fact, C-terminal
signal peptides have been identified in several bacterial proteins
(40), and alternative means of anchoring proteins to the cell surface
have been reported in Gram-positive bacteria (41).
The mechanism of EbpS expression on the bacterial cell surface is still
unclear. Several surface proteins of Gram-positive bacteria have been
found to share common motifs involved in sorting, transporting, and
anchoring to the cell surface (42). These motifs include a cleaved
signal peptide, which is followed by the ligand binding extracellular
N-terminal domain, a Pro-rich region thought to span the cell wall, a
conserved LPXTGX hexapeptide sequence, a
hydrophobic membrane-spanning domain, and a charged C-terminal tail. A
recent study by Schneewind et al. (43) has shown that
protein A of S. aureus is cleaved after the threonine
residue of the LPXTGX sequence and is anchored to
the cell wall via amide linkage of the carboxyl group of threonine to a
free amino group on the pentaglycine peptide moiety of the
staphylococcal peptidoglycan. Apart from the putative localization of
the elastin binding site to the extracellular N-terminal domain and
identification of a charged C-terminal tail, EbpS contains none of the
other common surface protein motifs. EbpS is not unique in this regard,
however, since several other Gram-positive surface proteins lack
conserved structures. Examples include streptococcal proteins such as
the fibronectin/fibrinogen-binding protein (44), albumin-binding
protein (38), and the plasmin receptor (45). Like EbpS, these proteins
are all smaller than the majority of Gram-positive surface proteins
with common structural motifs, and in the case of the streptococcal
plasmin receptor, the initial methionine residue is cleaved in the
mature protein (45), similar to what is found with EbpS.
It is now apparent that interactions between pathogenic bacteria and
host ECM components play an important role in disease pathogenesis.
However, molecular structure-function analyses for most ECM adhesins
have not been performed despite the obvious potential of developing
effective prophylactic and therapeutic agents based on information
derived from these studies. In cases where information is available,
the primary ligand binding site has been found to be contained in the
N-terminal extracellular domain (36, 46, 47). Consistent with this
observation is our finding that truncated fragments of rEbpS lacking
the first 59 amino acids do not bind elastin, confirming that the
elastin binding site in EbpS is also contained within the extracellular
N-terminal domain. Furthermore, preliminary studies show that a
recombinant construct of EbpS containing only this 59-amino acid domain
directly binds to elastin and inhibits binding of S. aureus
to elastin.2 Similar to other domains in
EbpS, this putative elastin binding region lacks homology with
sequences reported to various data bases. Additional studies using
recombinant constructs, synthetic peptides, and domain-specific
antibodies are in progress to further define the elastin binding site
in EbpS.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grants HL 26499 and HL 41926 (to R. P. M.) and AR 20553 (to J. R.).
The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the GenBankTM/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s) U48826[GenBank].
§
Present address: Joint Program in Neonatology, Harvard Medical
School, 300 Longwood Ave., Enders-9, Boston, MA 02134. Tel.:
617-355-7037; Fax: 617-355-7677; E-mail:
park_p{at}a1.tch.harvard.edu.
To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be
addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University
School of Medicine, Box 8228, 660 S. Euclid Ave., St. Louis, MO 63110. Tel.: 314-362-2254; Fax: 314-362-2252; E-mail:
bmecham{at}cellbio.wustl.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: ECM, extracellular
matrix; EbpS, elastin-binding protein of S. aureus, rEbpS, recombinant EbpS; MSCRAMM, microbial surface
component recognizing adhesive matrix molecules; Ni2+-NTA,
nickel nitriloacetic acid; TSB, tryptic soy broth; PCR, polymerase
chain reaction; kb, kilobase(s); PAGE, polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis.
2
P. W. Park, J. Rosenbloom, W. R. Abrams, and R. P. Mecham, manuscript in preparation.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Michael Caparon, William Parks,
and Robert Senior for valuable comments concerning the manuscript.
Technical assistance was provided by Clarina Tisdale and Benjamin
Mecham.
REFERENCES
-
Liotta, L. A.,
Rao, C. N.,
Wewer, U. M.
(1986)
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
55,
1037-1057
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bernfield, M.,
Kokenyesi, R.,
Kato, M.,
Hinkes, M. T.,
Spring, J.,
Gallo, R. L.,
Lose, E. J.
(1992)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
8,
365-393
[CrossRef]
-
Juliano, R. L.,
Haskill, S.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
120,
577-585
[Free Full Text]
-
Yamada, K. M.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
12809-12812
[Free Full Text]
-
Lobb, R. R.,
Hemler, M. E.
(1994)
J. Clin. Invest.
94,
1722-1728
-
Raghow, R.
(1994)
FASEB J.
8,
823-831
[Abstract]
-
Liotta, L. A.,
Steeg, P. S.,
Stetler-Stevenson, W. G.
(1991)
Cell
64,
327-336
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hynes, R. O.
(1992)
Cell
69,
11-25
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Haas, T. A.,
Plow, E. F.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6,
656-662
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mecham, R. P.
(1991)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
7,
71-91
[CrossRef]
-
Roberts, D. D.
(1990)
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.
3,
181-186
-
Patti, J. M.,
Allen, B. L.,
McGavin, M. J.,
Höök, M.
(1994)
Annu. Rev. Microbiol.
48,
585-617
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Oz, M. C.,
Brener, B. J.,
Buda, J. A.,
Todd, G.,
Brenner, R. W.,
Goldenkranz, R. J.,
McNicholas, K. W.,
Lemole, G. M.,
Lozner, J. S.
(1989)
J. Vasc. Surg.
10,
439-449
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sheagren, J. N.
(1984)
N. Engl. J. Med.
310,
1368-1373
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Waldvogel, F. A.,
Vasey, H.
(1980)
N. Engl. J. Med.
303,
360-370
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Speziale, P.,
Raucci, G.,
Visai, L.,
Switalski, L. M.,
Timpl, R.,
Höök, M.
(1986)
J. Bacteriol.
167,
77-81
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kuusela, P.
(1978)
Nature
276,
718-720
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lopes, J. D.,
DosReis, M.,
Brentani, R. R.
(1985)
Science
229,
275-277
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liang, O. D.,
Ascencio, F.,
Fransson, L.,
Wadström, T.
(1992)
Infect. Immun.
60,
899-906
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Park, P. W.,
Roberts, D. D.,
Grosso, L. E.,
Parks, W. C.,
Rosenbloom, J.,
Abrams, W. R.,
Mecham, R. P.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
23399-23406
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Baddour, L. M.
(1994)
Infect. Immun.
62,
2143-2148
[Free Full Text]
-
Switalski, L. M.,
Patti, J. M.,
Butcher, W. G.,
Gristina, A. G.,
Speziale, P.,
Höök, M.
(1993)
Mol. Microbiol.
7,
99-107
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Patti, J. M.,
Bremell, T.,
Krajewska-Pietrasik, D.,
Abdelnour, A.,
Tarkowski, A.,
Rydén, C.,
Höök, M.
(1994)
Infect. Immun.
62,
152-161
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rosenbloom, J.,
Abrams, W. R.,
Mecham, R. P.
(1993)
FASEB J.
7,
1208-1218
[Abstract]
-
Wrenn, D. S.,
Griffin, G. L.,
Senior, R. M.,
Mecham, R. P.
(1986)
Biochemistry
25,
5172-5176
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Takeshita, S.,
Sato, M.,
Toba, M.,
Masahashi, W.,
Hashimoto-Gotoh, T.
(1987)
Gene (Amst.)
61,
63-74
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
McKinney, M. M.,
Parkinson, A.
(1987)
J. Immunol. Methods
96,
271-278
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Busby, S.,
Ebright, R. H.
(1994)
Cell
79,
743-746
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Moran, C. P.,
Lang, N.,
LeGrice, S. F. J.,
Lee, G.,
Stephens, M.,
Sonenshein, A. L.,
Pero, J.,
Losick, R.
(1982)
Mol. & Gen. Genet.
186,
339-346
-
Lancefield, R. C.
(1962)
J. Bacteriol.
89,
307-313
-
Krivan, H. C.,
Roberts, D. D.,
Ginsburg, V.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
6157-6161
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Clarke, V. A.,
Platt, N.,
Butters, T. D.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
8805-8814
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lottenberg, R.,
Minning-Wenz, D.,
Boyle, M. D. P.
(1994)
Trends Microbiol.
2,
20-24
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Finlay, B. B.,
Falkow, S.
(1989)
Microbiol. Rev.
53,
210-230
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McDevitt, D.,
Francois, P.,
Vaudaux, P.,
Foster, T. J.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
11,
237-248
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sela, S.,
Aviv, A.,
Tovi, A.,
Burstein, I.,
Caparon, M. G.,
Hanski, E.
(1993)
Mol. Microbiol.
10,
1049-1055
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Signäs, C.,
Raucci, G.,
Jönsson, K.,
Lindgren, P.,
Anantharamaiah, G. M.,
Höök, M.,
Lindberg, M.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
699-703
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sjöbring, U.
(1992)
Infect. Immunol.
60,
3601-3608
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Talay, S. R.,
Valentin-Weigand, P.,
Timmis, K. N.,
Chhatwal, G. S.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
13,
531-539
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fath, M. J.,
Kolter, R.
(1993)
Microbiol. Rev.
57,
995-1017
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yother, J.,
White, J. M.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
2976-2985
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schneewind, O.,
Model, P.,
Fischetti, V. A.
(1992)
Cell
70,
267-281
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schneewind, O.,
Fowler, A.,
Faull, K. F.
(1995)
Science
268,
103-106
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Courtney, H. S.,
Li, Y.,
Dale, J. B.,
Hasty, D. L.
(1994)
Infect. Immun.
62,
3937-3946
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lottenberg, R.,
Broder, C. C.,
Boyle, M. P.,
Kain, S. J.,
Schroeder, B.
L.,
Curtiss, R., III
(1992)
J. Bacteriol.
174,
5204-5210
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McGavin, M. J.,
Gurusiddappa, S.,
Lindgren, P.,
Lindberg, M.,
Raucci, G.,
Höök, M.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
23946-23953
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Patti, J. M.,
House-Pompeo, K.,
Boles, J. O.,
Garza, N.,
Gurusiddappa, S.,
Höök, M.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
12005-12011
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Hayashida, A. H. Bartlett, T. J. Foster, and P. W. Park
Staphylococcus aureus Beta-Toxin Induces Lung Injury through Syndecan-1
Am. J. Pathol.,
February 1, 2009;
174(2):
509 - 518.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Sauer, J. Sila, T. Stosova, R. Vecerova, P. Hejnar, I. Vagnerova, M. Kolar, V. Raclavsky, J. Petrzelova, Y. Loveckova, et al.
Prevalence of genes encoding extracellular virulence factors among meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic
J. Med. Microbiol.,
April 1, 2008;
57(4):
403 - 410.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Nakakido, Y. Tanaka, and K. Tsumoto
The N-terminal domain of elastin-binding protein of Staphylococcus aureus changes its secondary structure in a membrane-mimetic environment
J. Biochem.,
August 1, 2007;
142(2):
131 - 134.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. J. Broekelmann, B. A. Kozel, H. Ishibashi, C. C. Werneck, F. W. Keeley, L. Zhang, and R. P. Mecham
Tropoelastin Interacts with Cell-surface Glycosaminoglycans via Its COOH-terminal Domain
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 9, 2005;
280(49):
40939 - 40947.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. M. Q. Shanks, N. P. Donegan, M. L. Graber, S. E. Buckingham, M. E. Zegans, A. L. Cheung, and G. A. O'Toole
Heparin Stimulates Staphylococcus aureus Biofilm Formation
Infect. Immun.,
August 1, 2005;
73(8):
4596 - 4606.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Heilmann, J. Hartleib, M. S. Hussain, and G. Peters
The Multifunctional Staphylococcus aureus Autolysin Aaa Mediates Adherence to Immobilized Fibrinogen and Fibronectin
Infect. Immun.,
August 1, 2005;
73(8):
4793 - 4802.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. B. van Leeuwen, D. C. Melles, A. Alaidan, M. Al-Ahdal, H. A. M. Boelens, S. V. Snijders, H. Wertheim, E. van Duijkeren, J. K. Peeters, P. J. van der Spek, et al.
Host- and Tissue-Specific Pathogenic Traits of Staphylococcus aureus
J. Bacteriol.,
July 1, 2005;
187(13):
4584 - 4591.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. G. Bowden, W. Chen, J. Singvall, Y. Xu, S. J. Peacock, V. Valtulina, P. Speziale, and M. Hook
Identification and preliminary characterization of cell-wall-anchored proteins of Staphylococcus epidermidis
Microbiology,
May 1, 2005;
151(5):
1453 - 1464.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Dryla, S. Prustomersky, D. Gelbmann, M. Hanner, E. Bettinger, B. Kocsis, T. Kustos, T. Henics, A. Meinke, and E. Nagy
Comparison of Antibody Repertoires against Staphylococcus aureus in Healthy Individuals and in Acutely Infected Patients
Clin. Vaccine Immunol.,
March 1, 2005;
12(3):
387 - 398.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. M. Roche, R. Downer, F. Keane, P. Speziale, P. W. Park, and T. J. Foster
The N-terminal A Domain of Fibronectin-binding Proteins A and B Promotes Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to Elastin
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 10, 2004;
279(37):
38433 - 38440.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Dubrac and T. Msadek
Identification of Genes Controlled by the Essential YycG/YycF Two-Component System of Staphylococcus aureus
J. Bacteriol.,
February 15, 2004;
186(4):
1175 - 1181.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Haggar, M. Hussain, H. Lonnies, M. Herrmann, A. Norrby-Teglund, and J.-I. Flock
Extracellular Adherence Protein from Staphylococcus aureus Enhances Internalization into Eukaryotic Cells
Infect. Immun.,
May 1, 2003;
71(5):
2310 - 2317.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Shinji, K. Seki, A. Tajima, A. Uchida, and S. Masuda
Fibronectin Bound to the Surface of Staphylococcus aureus Induces Association of Very Late Antigen 5 and Intracellular Signaling Factors with Macrophage Cytoskeleton
Infect. Immun.,
January 1, 2003;
71(1):
140 - 146.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. E. Shirtliff and J. T. Mader
Acute Septic Arthritis
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.,
October 1, 2002;
15(4):
527 - 544.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Vaudaux, P. Francois, C. Bisognano, W. L. Kelley, D. P. Lew, J. Schrenzel, R. A. Proctor, P. J. McNamara, G. Peters, and C. Von Eiff
Increased Expression of Clumping Factor and Fibronectin-Binding Proteins by hemB Mutants of Staphylococcus aureus Expressing Small Colony Variant Phenotypes
Infect. Immun.,
October 1, 2002;
70(10):
5428 - 5437.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Peacock, C. E. Moore, A. Justice, M. Kantzanou, L. Story, K. Mackie, G. O'Neill, and N. P. J. Day
Virulent Combinations of Adhesin and Toxin Genes in Natural Populations of Staphylococcus aureus
Infect. Immun.,
September 1, 2002;
70(9):
4987 - 4996.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Downer, F. Roche, P. W. Park, R. P. Mecham, and T. J. Foster
The Elastin-binding Protein of Staphylococcus aureus (EbpS) Is Expressed at the Cell Surface as an Integral Membrane Protein and Not as a Cell Wall-associated Protein
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 4, 2002;
277(1):
243 - 250.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Visai, S. Rindi, P. Speziale, P. Petrini, S. Fare, and M. C. Tanzi
In Vitro Interactions of Biomedical Polyurethanes with Macrophages and Bacterial Cells
J Biomater Appl,
January 1, 2002;
16(3):
191 - 214.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. K. Ellington, A. Elhofy, K. L. Bost, and M. C. Hudson
Involvement of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathways in Staphylococcus aureus Invasion of Normal Osteoblasts
Infect. Immun.,
September 1, 2001;
69(9):
5235 - 5242.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Hartleib, N. Kohler, R. B. Dickinson, G. S. Chhatwal, J. J. Sixma, O. M. Hartford, T. J. Foster, G. Peters, B. E. Kehrel, and M. Herrmann
Protein A is the von Willebrand factor binding protein on Staphylococcus aureus
Blood,
September 15, 2000;
96(6):
2149 - 2156.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. P. Nair, R. J. Williams, and B. Henderson
Advances in our understanding of the bone and joint pathology caused by Staphylococcus aureus infection
Rheumatology,
August 1, 2000;
39(8):
821 - 834.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Charron, W. Xu, R. L. Bacallao, and A. Wandinger-Ness
Cablin: a novel protein of the capillary basal lamina
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,
November 1, 1999;
277(5):
H1985 - H1996.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Palma, A. Haggar, and J.-I. Flock
Adherence of Staphylococcus aureus Is Enhanced by an Endogenous Secreted Protein with Broad Binding Activity
J. Bacteriol.,
May 1, 1999;
181(9):
2840 - 2845.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. W. Park, T. J. Broekelmann, B. R. Mecham, and R. P. Mecham
Characterization of the Elastin Binding Domain in the Cell-surface 25-kDa Elastin-binding Protein of Staphylococcus aureus (EbpS)
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 29, 1999;
274(5):
2845 - 2850.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|