|
Volume 271, Number 27,
Issue of July 5, 1996
pp. 16300-16309
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Antigen Binding Properties of Purified Immunoglobulin A and
Reconstituted Secretory Immunoglobulin A Antibodies*
(Received for publication, January 18, 1996, and in revised form, March 13, 1996)
Elke
Lüllau
,
Stephan
Heyse
§,
Horst
Vogel
§,
Ian
Marison
,
Urs
von Stockar
,
Jean-Pierre
Kraehenbuhl
¶ and
Blaise
Corthésy
¶ ''
From the Institut de Génie Chimique et
§ Institut de Chimie Physique, Ecole Polytechnique
Fédérale, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland, the
¶ Institut Suisse de Recherches Expérimentales sur le Cancer
et Institut de Biochimie, Université de Lausanne, Chemin des
Boveresses 155, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland, and the
Institut de Biologie Animale, Université de Lausanne,
CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The hybridoma cell line ZAC3 expresses
Vibrio cholerae lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-specific mouse IgA
molecules as a heterogeneous population of monomeric
(IgAm), dimeric (IgAd), and polymeric
(IgAp) forms. We describe a gentle method combining
ultrafiltration, ion-exchange chromatography, and size exclusion
chromatography for the simultaneous and qualitative separation of the
three molecular forms. Milligram quantities of purified IgA molecules
were recovered allowing for direct comparison of the biological
properties of the three forms. LPS binding specificity was tested after
purification; IgAd and IgAp were found to bind
strongly to LPS whereas IgAm did not. Secretory IgA (sIgA)
could be reconstituted in vitro by combining recombinant
secretory component (rSC) and purified IgAd or
IgAp, but not IgAm. Surface plasmon
resonance-based binding experiments using LPS monolayers indicated that
purified reconstituted sIgA and IgA molecules recognize LPS with
identical affinity (KA 1.0 × 108
M 1). Thus, this very sensitive assay provides
the first evidence that the function of SC in sIgA complex is not to
modify the affinity for the antigen. KA falls to
6.6 × 105 M 1 when measured by
calorimetry using detergent-solubilized LPS and IgA, suggesting that
the LPS environment is critical for recognition by the antibody.
INTRODUCTION
Secretory IgA (sIgA),1 the principal
immunoglobulin in mucous membrane secretions, consists of two monomeric
IgA units and two additional polypeptide chains, J chain and secretory
component (SC). The four constituent polypeptides are produced by two
distinct types of cells. The heavy, the light, and the J chains are
synthesized and assembled by plasma cells. SC corresponds to the five
extracellular domains of the poly-Ig receptor and is contributed by the
epithelial cells of mucous membranes and exocrine glands. During
passage through the epithelium, dimeric IgA with attached J chain
becomes associated with SC to form fully assembled sIgA. Despite the
discovery of sIgAs in the early sixties, their mechanism of action
remains poorly understood, mainly because of the difficulty in
producing sufficient amounts of purified dimeric IgA or sIgA antibodies
in a nonaggregated, native conformation.
IgA produced in large quantities from hybridoma cell lines can
potentially be used for passive protection or therapeutic intervention
on mucosal surfaces. For instance, monoclonal IgA antibodies directed
against respiratory syncytial virus applied passively to the
nasopharyngeal mucosa subsequently prevented initial infection and
pneumonia (Weltzin et al., 1994 ). Passive oral delivery of
IgA antibodies protected also against bacterial infections in the
intestine of mice (Winner et al., 1991 ; Michetti et
al., 1992 ; Apter et al., 1993 ; Blanchard et
al., 1995 ). However, relatively high doses of antibodies have to
be applied to ensure protection, because of 1) the heterogeneity of IgA
hybridoma products (as for instance monomers, single heavy, and light
chains), and 2) the lower proteolytic stability of IgAs without bound
SC (Mestecky et al., 1991 ). Such a passive treatment would
therefore gain in efficiency if a purification procedure of
biologically active IgA dimers with SC binding capacity would be
available.
IgA and sIgA have been purified on a laboratory scale from a variety of
sources including milk (Brandtzaeg, 1970 ; Woodard et al.,
1984 ; Bouige et al., 1990 ; Parr et al., 1995 ),
rat bile (Lemaître-Coelho et al., 1977 ; Taylor and
Dimmock, 1985 ), transfected mouse myelomas (Terskikh et al.,
1994), and transfected insect cells (Carayannopoulos et al.,
1994 ). However, these methods suffer from the difficulty of obtaining
highly purified and properly separated mono-, di-, and polymeric forms
in sufficient quantities to allow for direct comparison of the
biological properties of these antibody molecules. The present article
describes methods for the purification of different molecular forms of
IgA in milligram quantities from an anti-Vibrio cholerae
mouse hybridoma cell line. The ability of the different molecular forms
to bind with antigen and with recombinant SC have been studied
extensively. We demonstrate using surface plasmon resonance that SC
does not modify the affinity of IgA for the antigen. The readily
scalable procedure described enables the preparation of biologically
active IgA and sIgA molecular forms which eventually will contribute to
a fuller biochemical understanding of how the function of this
important class of antibodies is mediated.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Cell Line and Antibody Production
The murine hybridoma cell line ZAC3 is a fusion of a lymphocyte
from Peyer's patches of a BALB/c mouse orally immunized with V. cholerae Inaba strain with the myeloma cell line Sp/2.0. ZAC3
secretes IgA antibodies corresponding to the human allotype A2 m(1)
(Mestecky and Kilian, 1985 ) directed against surface lipopolysaccharide
(LPS). The cultures were grown in a protein-free Turbodoma FMX standard
medium (F. Messi Cell Culture Technologies, Switzerland) in a 2-liter
continuous stirred tank reactor (Biolafitte, France) with a working
volume of 1.6 liters. The pH was maintained at pH 7.3, the dissolved
oxygen concentration was automatically controlled at 80% air
saturation, and the temperature was maintained at 36.5 °C. During
production, the reactor was operated with a medium feed rate of 1.2 liters/day. For cell separation the harvest was filtered through a
Sartoclean CA membrane capsule with pore sizes of 0.65 and 0.8 µm
(Sartorius, Germany). The cell-free culture harvest containing the IgA
antibodies was stored under sterile conditions at 4 °C until further
required.
IgA Concentration
10-liter harvests were concentrated with a cross-flow membrane
ultrafiltration system (Skan AG, Switzerland) equipped with a type
Omega low protein binding membrane (100-kDa molecular mass cut-off) of
surface area 2.46 m2. Filtration was performed such that
one-third of the liquid passed the membrane and two-thirds remained in
the system. The solutions were 10-fold concentrated and diluted again
to the starting volume with loading buffer (10 mM potassium
phosphate, 100 mM NaCl, 0.02% sodium azide, pH 7.3) for
subsequent diafiltration. The final retentates of 10-liter culture
harvests were stored at 4 °C until further required. Protein
concentration of small volumes (50-300 ml) was carried out using a
50-ml Amicon stirred cell equipped with an Omega type membrane (10 kDa
cut-off value) at a pressure of 1 bar. Concentration reduced the
starting volume to 5 ml.
Column Chromatography
Column chromatography was performed with a HiLoadTM
system (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) comprising an UV-M II monitor, P-50
pump, a gradient programmer GP-10, a SuperFrac fraction collector, and
a recorder model 102. All steps were performed at 4 °C unless
otherwise indicated. The final retentate of a 10-liter cell culture
harvest was loaded onto a 500-ml DEAE-Sepharose FF (Pharmacia) column
(5 cm × 25 cm) equilibrated in loading buffer. Following washes
with 2 column volumes, stepwise elution was performed with 2 column
volumes each of 10 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.3)
containing successively 200 mM, 300 mM, and 500 mM NaCl at a flow rate of 30 cm/h. The profile of total
protein was monitored by absorbance at 280 nm, and the IgA-containing
fractions were identified by ELISA. These latter were pooled, diluted
twice with 10 mM potassium phosphate (pH 7.3) and passed
over a 50-ml DEAE-Sepharose FF column (2.6 cm × 10 cm), washed,
and eluted as above. The concentrated IgA was then separated by
size-exclusion chromatography on a Sephacryl S-300 (Pharmacia) column
(2.6 cm × 200 cm) equilibrated and run in PBS (Sambrook et
al., 1989 ) containing 0.02% sodium azide. Chromatography was
carried out at room temperature with a flow rate of 6.1 cm/h (0.5 ml/min). Elution of total protein was monitored by absorbance at 280 nm. Fractions containing the same molecular form of IgA were pooled and
diluted twice with ultrapure water prior to final concentration by
DEAE-Sepharose FF chromatography in a 5-ml column (1.6 cm × 5 cm)
equilibrated in loading buffer. Elution was carried out using a linear
salt gradient ranging from 200 mM to 500 mM
NaCl over 10 column volumes. The IgA concentration of each molecular
form was determined by ELISA, and the purity was checked by SDS-PAGE
and immunoblotting. The IgA solutions were stored at 4 °C. As an
alternative approach, 20 ml of protein concentrate was passed over an
AcA 22 Ultrogel (Biosepra, France) size-exclusion column (2.8 cm × 180 cm) equilibrated in 50 mM borate (pH 8.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.02% NaN3 at a flow rate of 2 cm/h
(0.3 ml/min).
Anti-mouse IgA Chain-specific ELISA
Total IgA concentration was determined by sandwich ELISA. Goat
anti-mouse IgA chain-specific antiserum (Sigma) diluted 1:500 in 50 mM bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) was used to coat wells (50 µl/well) of Immulon (Dynatech) 96-well plates overnight at 4 °C,
which were subsequently blocked (250 µl/well) with 1% BSA (Fluka) in
PBS, 0.1% Tween 20 (Sigma) at 37 °C for 30 min. Between all
antibody incubation steps except the last one, the plates were washed
three times with PBS, 0.01% Tween 20. IgA samples and mouse IgA
standards (Sigma; range 0.4 ng-7.5 ng) were diluted in blocking buffer,
and 50 µl were applied, in duplicate, to the wells. After incubation
for 2 h at 37 °C, IgA was detected with biotinylated goat
anti-mouse IgA antibodies (Amersham) followed by coupling with
streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (Amersham) and
development with ortho-phenyldiamine/H2O2. The
reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.01% sodium azide in citrate
buffer (pH 5.0). The absorbance was read at 492 nm and 629 nm, with the
latter serving as reference reading.
LPS-specific ELISA
The antibody binding specificity was detected by sandwich ELISA
as above exept that LPS (lipopolysaccharide from V. cholerae, serotype Inaba 569B, Sigma) was used as the capture
reagent. For each assay, three ELISA plates were needed. Plate 1 was
used to measure the concentration of total IgA in the purified monomer,
dimer, and polymer samples. Plate 2 served to test the specificity of
association of the different molecular forms of IgA to the LPS antigen.
Plate 3 allowed the percentage of LPS binding activity of IgA antibody
molecules to be determined indirectly.
Plates 1 and 3 were coated with 50 µl of goat anti-mouse IgA ( chain) antiserum diluted 1:500 in 50 mM sodium bicarbonate
buffer (pH 9.6), while plate 2 was coated with 50 µl of 40 µg/ml
LPS in the same buffer. Plates 1 and 2 were incubated for 3 h at
37 °C and blocked as above, while plate 3 was incubated overnight at
4 °C. Tetra-applicates of IgA samples and duplicates of mouse IgA
standards (50 µl) in blocking buffer were applied into the wells of
plates 1 and 2 and incubated overnight at 4 °C. The following day,
plate 1 was developed according to the protocol given above for chain-specific ELISA, yielding values of total IgA. Plate 3 was blocked
for 30 min at 37 °C, prior to transfer of 45 µl of each IgA sample
of plate 2 and 45 µl of freshly diluted IgA standards, incubated for
2 h at 37 °C, then developed as above to yield the
concentration of LPS-unbound IgA. The LPS binding activity of the
different IgA forms was finally calculated by subtracting the
concentration values of plate 3 from the corresponding values of plate
1.
Photometric Determination of Protein Concentration
Total protein concentrations were determined using the
Bradford-based protein assay (Bio-Rad). For the estimation of protein
concentration, an extinction coefficient of 1.3 was used (Stoscheck,
1990 ; Vaerman, 1995 ), so that 1 unit A280 = 1/1.3 mg.
In Vitro Reassociation of IgA and SC
Monomeric, dimeric, and multimeric IgA from mouse hybridoma ZAC3
obtained by the purification procedure given above were combined with
purified recombinant human SC (rSC; Rindisbacher et al.
(1995) ) in PBS and incubated for 16 h at ambient temperature.
Molar ratios and the amount of protein used are indicated in the figure
legends. Formation of covalent complexes was assayed by SDS-PAGE and
Western blotting. For antigen binding experiments (ELISA, SPR),
reassociated secretory IgA was prepared in the presence of a molar
excess of recombinant rSC, followed by size-exclusion chromatography to
separate sIgA from the excess of rSC. For protein amounts below 100 µg, the samples were passed over a 1 cm × 30 cm Superose 12 HR
10/30 column (Pharmacia) at 0.2 ml/min. For the preparation of 0.5 mg
of protein and above, the samples were chromatographed on a Superdex
200 (Pharmacia) column (1.6 cm × 140 cm) run at 0.6 ml/min.
Equilibration and elution were carried out in PBS. To ensure a constant
flow rate, both columns were coupled to a FPLC system (Pharmacia), with
continuous monitoring at 278 nm. The identity of the polypeptides in
the column fractions was checked by immunoblotting with antisera
against rSC and against IgA chain. The resulting complex
stoichiometry was assessed by ELISA.
Electrophoretic Methods
Protein SDS-PAGE
Gel electrophoresis of proteins was
carried out in a mini-Protean II apparatus (Bio-Rad), according to the
method of Laemmli (1970) . PAGE was performed under nonreduced
denaturing conditions (1% SDS) or reduced (in the presence of 2%
-mercaptoethanol or 100 mM dithiothreitol) and native
mode, depending on the nature of the samples under analysis. The gels
were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R or immunoblotted.
LPS Urea/SDS-PAGE
Gel electrophoresis of LPS was performed
as described by Tsai and Frasch (1982) , using Salmonella
wild-type LPS and Salmonella Re 595 LPS as standards
(Sigma). Polyacrylamide gel concentration was either 14% or 8-15%
gradient. Running and stacking gel buffers contained both 4 M urea and 0.1% SDS. Following separation, gels were
stained with silver or immunoblotted with purified IgAm,
IgAd, or IgAp.
Immunoblotting
IgA Heavy and Light Chain
Nonspecific binding sites on
nitrocellulose or polyvinylidine difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad) were
saturated for 1 h at room temperature by incubation in a blocking
buffer made of PBS, 10% BSA (Fluka), and 0.05% Tween 20 (Sigma). The
membrane was probed for 2 h at room temperature with either
biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgA heavy chain antibody (Amersham) or
with biotinylated goat anti-mouse chain specific antibody
(Amersham), diluted 1:1,000 in PBS/0.05% Tween 20. Bound antibodies
were detected using streptavidin coupled to HRP and the enhanced
chemiluminescence kit from Amersham.
IgA J Chain
Nonspecific binding sites were saturated for
1 h at room temperature by incubation in a blocking buffer made of
25 mM Tris-HCl, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM
KCl, pH 7.5, 5% non-fat dry milk, and 0.05% Tween 20. The membrane
was probed for 2 h at room temperature with rabbit anti-human J
chain serum (Hendrickson et al., 1995 ) diluted 1:1,000 in
blocking buffer for 2 h. Bound antibodies were detected with
HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit immunoglobulin antibodies (Sigma) and the
enhanced chemiluminescence kit from Amersham.
Human SC
Detection of the SC-IgA complexes was performed
using the procedure given in Rindisbacher et al. (1995) .
LPS
Polyvinylidine difluoride membranes were blocked with
PBS, 10% BSA, 0.05% Tween 20 prior to incubation with 1 µg of
IgAd, IgAp, and sIgA for 1 h. The interaction between
LPS on the membrane and various IgA forms was detected using goat
anti-mouse IgA heavy chain antibody, and rabbit anti-goat
HRP-conjugated IgG.
Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Measurements
Measurements were performed on a home-built setup using a
Kretschmann configuration (Kretschmann, 1972 ), as schematically shown
in Fig. 1. Adsorption of molecules to, or desorption
from, the surface shifts the angle of surface plasmon resonance (Knoll,
1991 ). For organic layers in which the thickness d is much
smaller than the light wavelength, the angle shift is proportional to
the change in optical thickness of the layer (which is the product
n × d, where the refractive index
difference is n = nlayer nbuffer and d the change in
geometrical thickness). For molecular layers with an index of
refraction n = 1.45, the experimental angle resolution
of 0.01° allowed the detection of thickness changes of 1 Å, with a
time resolution of 1 measurement every 10 s.
Fig. 1.
Setup for surface plasmon resonance
measurements of IgA binding to LPS membranes (not drawn to
scale). A, optical configuration, a 60° SF10 glass prism
is assembled via an index-matching oil to a glass slide onto which a 50 nm gold film has been evaporated. This assembly is pressed against a
Teflon half-cuvette with the gold surface exposed to the solution in
the cuvette. A parallel, monochromatic (633 nm) p-polarized
light beam is focused by a cylindrical lens onto the gold film at the
prism base, yielding a defined range of incidence angles. The resonance
curve, representing the intensity of the reflected light as a function
of angle, is recorded by a photodiode array connected to a PC. The
angle of surface plasmon resonance (SPR angle) is marked by a minimum
of intensity in the reflected light beam. B, model of
molecular layer assemblies at the gold surface. From top to
bottom, in a first step, a tetradecanethiol layer is
self-assembled onto the bare gold to render the surface hydrophobic. In
a second step, this surface is exposed to a suspension of LPS vesicles
in buffer, generating a LPS monolayer on top of the alkylthiol layer.
Finally, IgA or sIgA, respectively, is injected into the cuvette, and
the antibody binding to the LPS surface is monitored.
Preparation of LPS Membranes on Gold Surfaces and IgA
Binding
A supported monolayer of LPS was formed on an alkylated gold
surface by exposing the support to a LPS vesicles dispersion, a
procedure analogous to vesicle spreading techniques used for formation
of phospholipid monolayers on alkylated surfaces (Kalb et
al., 1992 ; Terrettaz et al., 1993 ). Glass slides with
evaporated 50 nm gold film were immersed overnight in a 1 mg/ml
solution of tetradecanethiol in ethanol to cover the gold with a
self-assembled, tightly packed thioalkane layer (Bain et
al., 1989 ). LPS vesicle dispersions were produced by four times
sonication of 1 mg of LPS in 50 µl of 25 mM phosphate
buffer, pH 7.0, in a bath-type sonicator (Sonorex PK, Modell 102p) for
3 min. The clear vesicle dispersion obtained was diluted to a final LPS
concentration of 1 mg/ml. 400 µl of this dispersion were placed into
the cuvette, and LPS adsorption to the surface was monitored with SPR.
When a stable signal had been attained (usually after 1 to 1.5 h),
indicating that LPS layer formation was complete, excess LPS was
removed by diluting 1:1 (v:v) with 25 mM phosphate buffer
10 times, while continuously maintaining the LPS layer covered with
buffer. The SPR angle obtained after this rinsing procedure was used as
a packing measure of the LPS layer.
To measure IgAd binding to these supported LPS monolayers,
first the phosphate buffer was exchanged by PBS by diluting 10 times
1:1 with PBS, then 200 µl of PBS were removed, leaving 200 µl in
the cuvette to cover the LPS monolayer. At the beginning of the
IgAd concentration series, the baseline was recorded. Then,
200 µl of IgAd solution of two times the desired
concentration was injected, mixed with the solution in the cuvette, and
the binding was recorded. At low IgAd concentrations,
intermediate injections were performed to account for adsorption of
IgAd to the cuvette walls, by replacing 200 µl of the
solution in the cuvette with 200 µl of the simple IgAd
concentration. When binding at the given concentration was complete, a
rinsing step was done by diluting 1:3 (v:v) with PBS 2 to 5 times,
depending on the previous IgAd concentration in the
cuvette. From the SPR angle after the rinse step, the base line was
subtracted to give the angle shift corresponding to the amount of bound
IgAd at the respective concentration. The binding at the
next higher IgAd concentration was then measured.
Microcalorimetry
Calorimetric measurements (Wiseman et al., 1989 ) were
carried out using an MCS isothermal titration microcalorimeter
(MicroCal Inc., Northampton, MA). Due to the amphiphilic nature of LPS,
measurements were performed in 50 mM
octyl- -D-glucopyranoside (Fluka) dissolved in PBS. The
1.36-ml cell was filled with a 1 mg/ml IgA solution in
octyl- -D-glucopyranoside/PBS, corresponding to an
antibody concentration of 2.9 µM. A solution of 1.5 mg/ml
LPS in octyl- -D-glucopyranoside/PBS was stepwise
injected from a 250-µl syringe at 5-min intervals in portions of 12 µl (except the first shot, which was 1 µl), while stirring at 400 rpm. At this LPS concentration, an average of one LPS molecule is
present per three detergent micelles; thus, no cross-linking by
antibodies occurs. Water was used as reference and the instrument was
calibrated by standard electrical pulses. Data analysis was performed
using the Origin software and routines delivered by MicroCal together
with the instrument. As LPS represents a mixture of species with
different sugar chain lengths, an average molar mass had to be assumed.
In a first step, this was set to 5,000 and the heat per injection was
fitted with a single-site binding model with, as free parameters,
number of ligands (N) per antibody, affinity constant
K, and molar heat of binding H. From the obtained
value of N, the average LPS molar mass was readjusted to
give a binding stoichiometry of n = 4 (new molar
mass: 10,400), and the fit was repeated to give new values K
and H.
RESULTS
IgA Purification
IgA secreted by ZAC3 hybridoma cells was
found to comprise a mixture of four different molecular forms, the
apparent sizes of which were determined by electrophoretic mobility in
SDS-polyacrylamide gels and by size exclusion
chromatography.2 The values obtained were
160 kDa for monomers, 340 kDa for dimers, 560-800 kDa for polymers,
and >1,200 kDa for aggregates.
DEAE-Sepharose FF beads allowed a quantitative binding of IgA under low
salt conditions. Using stepwise salt elution, it was observed that 90%
of the IgA mixture loaded onto the column eluted at 200 mM
NaCl. Residual protein was eluted with 500 mM salt (Fig.
2A). The presence of IgA in the 200 mM salt eluate was assessed by immunodetection. Analysis by
SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining of this material revealed the
presence of several minor contaminants (Fig.
3A, lanes 3 and 4).
Size exclusion chromatography was consequently selected to separate the
various IgA forms prepurified by passage on the anion exchanger. Two
different resins and column sizes were tested. AcA 22 Ultrogel, with a
fractionation range of 100-1,200 kDa, yielded several fractions with
either pure dimers or polymers, but was considered unsuitable for large
scale purification due to an unacceptable flow rate (2.0 cm/h). In
order to overcome this problem, Sephacryl S300 HR with a fractionation
range of 10-1,500 kDa was tested. While no baseline separation could
be achieved between dimers and polymers (Fig. 2B), this
procedure allowed the reproducible recovery of purified dimer in
one-fourth of the total IgA-containing fractions (Fig. 3C).
The optimal resolution was obtained by loading 10-30 mg of IgA mixture
in a 10-ml sample volume, at a flow rate of 6.1 cm/h. DEAE
anion-exchange chromatography was optimized for final concentration of
the various purified IgA forms. It was observed that the best results
were obtained using a linear salt gradient ranging from 200 to 500 mM NaCl.
Fig. 2.
Fractionation of ZAC3 hybridoma
supernatant. A, elution profile of the 500-ml DEAE-Sepharose
FF column run as described under ``Experimental Procedures.''
IgA-containing fractions were identified by ELISA. Bar
indicates the pooled fractions. B, monitoring of the elution
profile of the Sephacryl S-300 column starting after the void volume.
Fraction size was 9 ml. The different IgA forms were identified by
Western blotting. IgA concentration was only measured after the
fractions containing the same IgA forms were pooled according to the
bars on the top of the peaks.
Fig. 3.
SDS-PAGE analysis of purification
intermediates. Selected samples were run under nonreducing
conditions on gradient gels (4-12%). Unless otherwise indicated, the
gel slots were loaded with 10 µg of protein for Coomassie stain
(A and C) and 100 ng for immunodetection
(B). A and B, starting material
(lane 1), retentate (lane 2), pooled
IgA-containing fractions from the 500-ml DEAE-Sepharose column
(lane 3), pooled IgA-containing fractions from the 50-ml
DEAE-Sepharose column (lane 4). C, Sephacryl
S-300 fractions. Numbers on top of the figure
correspond to the elution fractions in Fig. 2B.
The overall yield and purity of the different molecular forms obtained
using the procedure based on separation with Sephacryl S-300 are
reported in Table I. Provided that only 30% of the
initial total IgA was IgAd, the true yield of purified
dimeric form was as high as 53.7%, a value which is considerably
higher than any previously published protocols (Mestecky and Kilian
(1985) and references herein). The final purity was estimated to be
90% for monomers and 99% for dimers and polymers. Similar figures
were obtained with the AcA 22 Ultrogel column.2 Minor
contaminants remained associated with IgA as shown by Coomassie Blue
staining of SDS-polyacrylamide gels with high protein loading (Fig.
3C). Immunological characterization of contaminating
polypeptides in IgA fractions indicated that they are not related to
chain, chain, or J chain (Fig. 3B and Fig.
4).
Table I.
Fractionation scheme for ZAC3 cell culture harvest
|
Volume |
Protein |
IgA |
Purity |
Yield
|
|
|
liter |
g/liter |
mg/liter |
|
%
|
| Procedure 1 |
| Culture
harvest |
10 |
0.226a |
26.4 |
0.12 |
100
|
| Ultrafiltration cut-off
100-kDa |
1.63 |
0.512a |
133.3 |
0.26 |
82
|
| DEAE-Sepharose (500 ml) |
0.36 |
0.565a |
500 |
0.88 |
68 |
| DEAE-Sepharose
(50 ml) |
0.032 |
5.740b |
5319 |
0.93 |
64
|
| Sephacryl S-300 |
2.016 |
|
|
|
45 |
| Aggregate
|
| Aggregate/polymer |
0.126 |
|
9.5 |
|
0.5
|
| Polymer |
0.315 |
|
97.5 |
0.99c |
11.6
|
| Polymer/dimer |
0.378 |
|
57.9 |
0.99c |
8.3
|
| Dimer |
0.315 |
|
134.6 |
0.99c |
16.3
|
| Dimer/monomer |
0.252 |
|
46.4 |
|
4.4
|
| Monomer |
0.630 |
|
19.0 |
0.90c |
4.5
|
| Procedure 2 |
| Culture
harvest |
10 |
0.258a |
38 |
0.12 |
100
|
| Ultrafiltration 1 cut-off
100-kDa |
1 |
0.576a |
150 |
0.26 |
39
|
| DEAE-Sepharose (500 ml) |
0.2 |
0.780a |
1082 |
0.88 |
37
|
| Ultrafiltration 2 cut-off 10-kDa |
0.02 |
| AcA 22 Ultrogel |
0.238 |
|
|
|
17 |
| Aggregate |
0.021 |
|
1.6
|
| Aggregate/polymer |
0.035 |
|
15.5 |
0.99c |
4.1
|
| Polymer |
0.021 |
|
8.2 |
0.99c |
2.2
|
| Polymer/dimer |
0.028 |
|
16.9 |
0.99c |
4.4
|
| Dimer |
0.035 |
|
17.1 |
0.99c |
4.5
|
| Dimer/monomer |
0.028 |
|
0.9 |
0.90c |
0.2
|
| Monomer |
0.070 |
|
5.9 |
0.90c |
1.6 |
|
|
a
Total protein determined with the Bio-Rad protein
assay using IgA as standard.
|
|
b
Total protein measured by optical density at 280 nm.
|
|
c
Estimated by Coomassie staining of SDS-polyacrylamide
gels.
|
|
Fig. 4.
Biochemical characterization of purified
IgA. Western blot analysis of IgA recovered following procedure 1. Samples were applied to SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels (4-12% for
A, B, and E; 4-15% for C
and D) derived from the pooled fractions recovered after the
Sephacryl S-300 column and eluted from the 5-ml DEAE-Sepharose
concentrating column at 250 mM in 10 mM
potassium phosphate (pH 7.3), 0.02% sodium azide (KPi).
Terms in brackets indicate the storage conditions. The content of the
lanes was as follows. Lane 1, polymer/dimer (PBS);
lane 2, polymer/dimer (KPi); lane 3,
dimer (PBS); lane 4, dimer (KPi); lane
5, monomer (PBS); lane 6, monomer (KPi);
lane 7, dimer/monomer (PBS); lane 8,
dimer/monomer (KPi); lane 9, polymer (PBS);
lane 10, polymer (KPi); lane 11,
polymer/dimer (KPi). A, signal obtained with 100 ng of IgA per lane using anti-mouse chain antibody under
nonreducing conditions. B, signal obtained with 150 ng of
IgA per lane using anti-mouse chain antibody under nonreducing
conditions. C, signal obtained with 100 ng of IgA per lane
using anti-mouse and chain antibody under reducing conditions.
D, signal obtained with 300 ng of IgA per lane using anti-J
chain antiserum under reducing conditions. E, signal
obtained with 300 ng of IgA per lane using anti-J chain antiserum under
nonreducing conditions. Lane 1, IgAm; lane
2, IgAd; lane 3, IgAp.
Biochemical Characterization of Purified IgA
The polypeptide
content of the purified IgA forms was assayed by immunodetection using
a battery of antibodies and antiserum against the chain, the chain, and the J chain. Polymeric and dimeric forms contain all three
chains, indicating that assembly of the protein occurred in the
hybridoma cell. Fig. 4 shows the migration pattern obtained by SDS-PAGE
under nonreducing (Fig. 4, A and B) and reducing
(Fig. 4, C and D) conditions of independent
preparations of IgA. Detection with anti chain antibody (Fig.
4A) revealed the covalent nature of the association between
the heavy chains in the different existing molecular forms. Detection
of the IgA forms with anti- chain antibody indicates that partial
covalent association of the light chain took place in monomers and
dimers, but not in polymeric structures (Fig. 4B). Fig.
4C shows detection of both the chain and the chain
as single bands, demonstrating the absence of protein degradation
during the process of purification. Immunodetection by rabbit antiserum
against J chain indicates that all forms of purified IgA contain J
chain, yet to a different extent (Fig. 4D). Under
nonreducing conditions, J chain is covalently associated within
IgAd and IgAp molecules, as shown in Fig.
4E.
Antigen Binding of Purified IgA with and without Secretory
Component
The biological activity of the purified IgA forms was
tested in a so-called ``ELISA specific assay,'' where the binding of
IgA to lipopolysaccharide antigen from the outer membrane of V. cholerae could be detected. Both polymers and dimers did exhibit
strong, specific, and apparently similar binding to the LPS antigen,
whereas IgA monomers showed no binding. Using equal amounts of protein,
less binding to LPS for the IgA preparation from the AcA 22 Ultrogel
column was repeatedly observed. However, since ELISA is accurate to
10%, the two procedures were judged to yield comparable and
satisfactory levels of biologically active IgA antibody in different
purified molecular forms. We next examined whether rSC might influence
the binding of IgAd and IgAp to LPS antigen.
This was undertaken by in vitro reconstitution of sIgA (see
below), followed by determination of the antigen-antibody interaction.
No significant difference was observed for IgAd and
IgAp carrying or lacking rSC (Table II),
which suggests that binding of rSC to IgA does not affect antigen
recognition.
Table II.
Binding of IgA and sIgA to LPS antigen
|
Phosphate buffer Procedure 1 |
Borate buffer Procedure 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% binding
|
| IgAm |
2 |
2 |
1.5 |
1.5
|
| IgAd |
75.4 |
81.4 |
54.2 |
60.6
|
| sIgAd |
81.2 |
83 |
62.6 |
67.4
|
| IgAp |
96 |
94.7 |
86.7 |
87.3
|
| sIgAp |
94 |
95 |
90 |
91.5 |
|
Reconstitution of IgA-SC Complexes in Vitro
The specificity
of association of dimeric and multimeric IgA with rSC was assessed
in vitro by combining overnight the partners in PBS buffer.
As shown previously, rSC can serve as a specific ligand for IgA
(Rindisbacher et al., 1995 ) and behaves identically as human
SC recovered from milk. Reconstituted complexes were loaded onto a 6%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel, blotted to polyvinylidine difluoride membrane,
and detected with antiserum against rSC. Fig.
5A shows that covalent reconstitution took
place as indicated by the shift of rSC to the position of
IgAd and IgAp molecules. Under reducing
conditions, only free SC could be detected to a similar extent in every
lane, indicating that SC-IgA complexes were held together through
disulfide bridges. No formation of SC-IgA complex was observed with
IgAm.3 Using densitometry
scanning, we repeatedly noticed that on immunoblots the signal of free
rSC was 3-fold stronger than the signal generated by the same amount of
protein bound to IgA. Based on this observation, the extent of covalent
association was estimated to reach approximately 80% with IgA
recovered from the Sephacryl S-300 column (Fig. 5A). This is
consistent with published values using in vitro
reconstituted human secretory IgA (Lindh and Björk, 1976 ; Goto
and Aki, 1984 ) and sIgA purified from milk samples (Mach, 1970 ; Weicker
and Underdown, 1975 ).
Fig. 5.
Analysis of in vitro
reconstituted sIgA. A, covalent reassociation of rSC with
purified IgAd and IgAp recovered in phosphate
buffer (p; lanes 1 and 6) and borate
buffer (b; lanes 3 and 8). Samples
were separated by SDS-PAGE under nonreducing conditions, and specific
sIgA covalent complexes were detected with anti-rSC antiserum. No
signal could be observed in the absence of rSC in the reassociation
mixture (lanes 2, 4, 7, and
9). rSC alone was loaded in lane 5. Lanes 10-13
contain the same samples as in lanes 1, 3,
6, and 8 run under reducing conditions.
B, molecular sieving chromatography of reconstituted
IgAd-rSC (1:2 molar ratio). Bars correspond to
sIgA and excess of rSC, as determined by Western blot analysis of the
peak fractions. Note that the intensity of free rSC in lanes
25-27 is much higher than the intensity of free and IgA-bound rSC
in lanes 19-21. C, measurement by ELISA of sIgA association
as a function of the IgAd-rSC molar ratio. A 1:1
stoichiometry is achieved in all cases.
For antigen binding experiments, dimeric IgA-rSC complexes were
purified further by high pressure gel filtration chromatography.
Increasing molar ratios of rSC to IgAd were reacted at room
temperature for 16 h, prior to separation of the sIgA from the
excess of rSC on sizing columns. A typical elution profile is shown in
Fig. 5B. The content of the peak fractions was further
checked by immunodetection using antisera against rSC (Fig.
5B) and IgA chain (not shown). The degree of covalent
association was tested under nonreducing conditions and confirmed to be
in the range of 80%. Incubation of IgAd with rSC in molar
ratios of 1:2 and 1:3 did lead to the production of a
rSC-IgAd complex with a 1:1 stoichiometry as when a 1:1
ratio of IgAd and SC was used (Fig. 5C). Such
purified sIgA in PBS was then quantified and used in parallel with
unreconstituted IgAd subjected to the same experimental
conditions, in order to directly compare the antigen binding properties
of the two IgA species.
Characterization of LPS
Analysis of V. cholerae
LPS by SDS-PAGE revealed that it is composed of at least 6 components
of different molecular weight. The smallest fraction migrated closely
to the Salmonella Re 595 LPS standard, which LPS is composed
of lipid A and three octulusonic acid units (Brandenburg, 1993 ) with a
molecular mass of around 2,700 Da. Thus, the molecular mass of the
smallest component of V. cholerae LPS appears to be in the
range of 3,000 to 4,000 Da. The specificity of purified IgA toward the
different V. cholerae LPS components was assayed by blotting
the gel and incubating with IgA at a concentration of 100 ng/ml and 1 µg/ml. It turned out that all LPS fractions were recognized by the
antibody (Fig. 6), suggesting that the epitope is
situated in the lipid A or core sugar region of LPS and not in the
O-specific chain.
Fig. 6.
Characterization of LPS. LPS was
separated by urea/SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose
membrane. 100 ng/ml (lanes 1, 3, 5,
and 7) and 1 mg/ml (lanes 2, 4,
6, and 8) of purified IgAd and
IgAp recovered in phosphate buffer (p) and
borate buffer (b) were incubated with individual
nitrocellulose stripes containing LPS. IgA-LPS interaction was
determined using an anti- chain antibody. The minus sign
on the left indicates the six different forms of LPS bound
by the antibody.
Assembly of LPS Monolayers on Alkylated Gold Surfaces
The
interaction of IgAs raised against V. cholerae bacteria with
their membrane-bound antigens was studied in a reconstituted system
consisting of LPS membranes on alkylated gold supports. This
arrangement mimicked LPS structure in the outer bacterial membrane and
allowed quantification of antibody binding to the artificial LPS
membranes by surface plasmon resonance. Film balance measurements
(Ulman, 1991 ) showed that V. cholerae LPS forms stable
monolayers on the air-water interface. Exposure of an alkylated gold
surface to LPS-containing vesicles led to adsorption of material to
this surface within 1-2 h. The total SPR angle shifts observed for all
LPS membrane preparations ranged from 0.3° to 0.4°, with an average
of 0.37° ± 0.07°. A refractive index of n = 1.45 corresponding to a 24-Å organic layer on the alkylated gold was
obtained. By comparison, Fukuoka et al. (1994) measured a
thickness of 27 Å for a monolayer of Erwinia carotonova
rough mutant LPS. It is thus reasonable to conclude that the
self-assembled structure on the alkylthiol surface corresponds to a LPS
monolayer.
Binding of IgA and sIgA to Supported LPS Monolayers
To obtain
binding constants of IgAd and sIgA toward LPS monolayers,
SPR measurements were performed as shown in Fig. 7.
Binding affinities of IgA were determined with the antigen present in
the form of a self-assembled LPS monolayer modeling a bacterial outer
membrane. Because the surface could not be recycled, a new LPS
monolayer had to be prepared for each experiment. This layer usually
had a different optical thickness, indicating variations in LPS packing
density on the surface. The SPR angle shifts for LPS membranes used for
the IgA and sIgA binding experiments shown in Fig. 7 were 0.42° and
0.36°, respectively. Fig. 8 shows the angle shifts due
to antibody binding using increasing antibody concentrations. Because
no irrelevant dimeric IgA of comparable purity was available, values of
nonspecific IgG binding to LPS monolayers were used to correct the
binding data at high antibody concentrations (Fig. 8A), to
obtain the data shown in Fig. 8B.
Fig. 7.
Binding of IgAd and
sIgAd to LPS monolayers on alkylated gold surfaces
presented as the SPR angle versus time. A,
increasing amounts of IgAd injected into the cuvette,
expressed as final concentrations in nM (labeled
arrows). Possible binding of antibodies to the walls of the
cuvette makes intermediate reinjections at 1, 6, 20, and 59 nM antibody concentration necessary before proceeding to
the next higher antibody concentration (unlabeled arrows).
After binding at a given antibody concentration has reached saturation,
the original refractive index of PBS buffer is restored by a rinse step
(r). This leads to an angle shift when higher concentrated
antibody solution in the cuvette is replaced by buffer. The difference
between SPR angle values at a given IgAd concentration
(after rinse) and at the very beginning of the experiment gives the
angle shift  for this antibody concentration. B, same
binding experiment as in A performed with reconstituted
purified sIgA.
Fig. 8.
Binding curves of IgAd,
sIgAd, and nonspecific IgG antibody to LPS monolayer
surfaces. The curves represent the SPR angle shifts
deduced from the experiments shown in Fig. 7 versus the
antibody concentration. A, binding of two different types of
specific IgA antibodies and nonspecific IgG antibody as control was
measured: specific IgAd ( ), reconstituted specific sIgA
( ), and nonspecific IgG ( ). For IgAd and sIgA, lines
are connecting the measured points. Nonspecific IgG binding values were
interpolated by a Langmuir adsorption isotherm fitted to the data
points (broken line). B, amount of antibody
specifically bound to the LPS membrane versus concentration,
calculated as the difference between total antibody binding and binding
of nonspecific IgG, for IgAd ( ) and sIgA ( ). Lines
are Langmuir fits to the data sets, yielding the respective
dissociation constants (KD = 1/KA). It can be seen from the graph that the slopes
of the binding curves are slightly steeper than predicted by the simple
Langmuir adsorption model.
By comparing the binding curves in Fig. 8B, it is obvious
that the secretory component does not alter the affinity of
IgAd for LPS membranes (KA 1.0 × 108 M 1). This is both evident
from Fig. 8B comparing the concentration values for
half-maximal binding in the specific binding curves (9 nM)
as from the dissociation constants evaluated from Langmuir fits (both
IgA and sIgA: 10 nM). Due to the higher molecular mass of
sIgA with respect to IgAd, more material adsorbs at a given
concentration, leading to a bigger angle shift. Nevertheless, if the
angle shifts of IgAd and sIgA are normalized by their
respective molecular masses, one obtains a binding ratio of 0.93 (mol
of sIgA/mol of IgA) at antibody concentrations of 6 nM up
to 590 and 570 nM for IgAd and sIgA,
respectively. This points to steric effects at the surface, limiting
the adsorbed mass density.
IgA Binding to Solubilized LPS
Fig. 9 shows an
isothermal calorimetric titration of IgAd with
detergent-solubilized LPS (see ``Experimental Procedures'') which
served to determine the binding constant of one IgA binding site to one
LPS antigen (single-site binding constant). From the binding isotherm,
an affinity constant of 6.6 × 105
M 1 is deduced by fitting the data to a
single-site binding model (Wiseman et al., 1989 ). This is
about 200 times lower than the association constant of IgAs toward LPS
monolayers. As an exact average molar mass for LPS is not known, the
binding stoichiometry has been set to 4 LPS molecules per
IgAd molecule. This is justified by the nearly 100%
activity of the IgA preparations (Table II) and by the fact that IgA
binds to all fractions of the LPS, including molecular species composed
only of lipid A and some core sugars (Fig. 6). In addition, the molar
heat of binding was found to be 1.9 kcal/mol.
Fig. 9.
Calorimetric measurement of IgA binding to
detergent-solubilized LPS. The upper panel shows the
differential heat during a titration of IgAd with
increasing LPS ligand. The lower panel shows the integrated
heat per injection versus the molar ratio LPS:total antibody
binding sites ( ), along with a fit of these data by a single-site
binding model ( ). Free parameters of the fit were the affinity
constant K and the molar heat of binding H. All
injection peaks in the upper panel were considered for data
fitting, with the exception of those marked with a
cross.
DISCUSSION
Among the human immunoglobulins, IgA is one of the most difficult
to purify. Indeed, IgA heterogeneity with respect to molecular weight
is known for IgA deriving from myeloma cells and for sIgA from
colostrum. Procedures developed for monomeric IgA deriving from natural
sources such as human serum (Heremans, 1974 ; Mestecky and Kilian, 1985 )
are complicated processes most frequently yielding only small
quantities of purified IgA. Higher molecular IgA forms are found in
human myeloma cultures and in external secretions. Colostrum and early
milk represent the most convenient source of human sIgA. No simple
purification procedure for IgA produced by hybridoma cell culture
techniques, which allows the purification and separation of different
molecular forms of IgA in large quantities, has been reported so far.
We have developed a simple purification scheme, based on classical
chromatographic methods leading to pure and biologically active
IgAd and IgAp.
Since IgA was produced in protein-free culture medium, the problems
associated with purification due to the presence of serum IgA were
abolished. As an alternative to ammonium sulfate precipitation
(Mestecky and Kilian, 1985 ), which presents the disadvantage of
exposing the samples to salts that interfere in ELISA and protein
determination,2 ultrafiltration was found to be a valuable
method, allowing to concentrate IgA 10-fold with a yield of 80%. We
indeed observed that a 100-kDa molecular mass cut-off did not only
reduce the loading volume for the following chromatography step, but
also the amount of protein (contaminants and IgAm) in the
IgA-containing fraction by about 60%. Further enrichment in IgA by a
factor of 3.4 was achieved using ion exchange chromatography on
DEAE-Sepharose FF resin. 80 to 90% of the IgA loaded could be eluted
stepwise as a single fraction with 200 mM salt. This choice
of a DEAE-type resin has been applied to the purification of human IgA
(Mestecky and Kilian, 1985 ) and mouse IgA (Lee et al.,
1994 ). This may suggest a general use for DEAE-based ion-exchange
chromatography in IgA purification or concentration. Subsequently, IgA
mono-, di-, and polymers were separated in a single chromatography
step. This separation required a 200-cm-long Sephacryl S-300 column
(maximum load 25-30 mg of protein) and a long run (6.1 cm/h), but
avoided the repetitive runs using AcA 22 Ultrogel columns reported by
Vaerman (1995) for IgA from human myeloma cells.
The biochemical characterization of the different forms of IgA showed
that polymeric and dimeric forms contained all three , , and J
chain polypeptides (Fig. 4, A-E). Two different
forms of mouse IgA exist (Vaerman, 1972 ): one in which light chains are
disulfide-linked to each other (IgAL-L) and the second
where light chains are linked to heavy chains (IgAH-L). In
ZAC3 hybridoma, partial covalent association of the light chain to
heavy chain could be detected in monomers and dimers but not in
polymers (Fig. 4B). Under nonreducing conditions, the
presence of J chain could be detected in dimeric and polymeric IgA
forms only (Fig. 4E). However, under reducing conditions,
the monomer fraction also showed a weak J chain signal (Fig.
4D), most likely due to traces of IgAd (Fig.
3C), as reported by Weicker and Underdown (1975) . Indeed,
IgAm usually does not contain J chain (Koshland, 1985 ;
Kerr, 1990 ).
Binding experiments of the different purified IgA forms to an outer
membrane LPS antigen from V. cholerae revealed that IgA
monomers did not associate with LPS whereas dimers and polymers did. As
published by Ishizaka et al. (1965) , the polymeric nature of
secretory IgA provides an increase in overall avidity for antigen and
also an enhanced ability to cross-link multiple particles. This may
explain why a dimer, or a polymeric form, is needed for antigen
binding. This implies that the polymeric structure is essential for IgA
to perform its function in mucosal secretions (Underdown and Schiff,
1986 ).
Purified IgAd and IgAp bind to recombinant
secretory component (rSC), whereas IgAm does not
reassociate with rSC in vitro. Furthermore, rSC and IgA
dimers or polymers covalently reassociate, reflecting a biochemical
behavior similar to, if not identical with, sIgA found in mucosal and
glandular secretions (Fig. 5A). In addition, the experiments
based on size exclusion chromatography of rSC-IgA complexes show that
even with an excess of rSC, one rSC molecule associates with one IgA
dimer. This indicates that both partners can recognize each other with
a defined intrinsic stoichiometry, rather than resulting from the
nonspecific interaction of partners in solution (Fig. 5, B
and C). The degree of specific reassociation between
overexpressed and highly purified proteins enabled the comparative
antigen binding studies described in this work.
The IgAd binding constant to LPS membranes determined in
this study (KA 1.0 × 108
M 1) has the same order of magnitude to those
commonly measured for IgGs directed against peptides in solution
(KA 107-109
M 1, Schwarz et al. (1995) ) or
immobilized on surfaces (KA 108
M 1, van den Heuvel et al. (1993)
and Duschl et al. (1996) ). Furthermore, the binding constant
of IgAd to LPS monolayers has been found to be two orders
of magnitude higher than to solubilized LPS. The latter binding
constant (KA 6.6 × 105
M 1) compares to published binding constants
for IgG binding to Salmonella O-antigenic oligosaccharides,
which are in the range of 5 × 105
M 1 (Sigurskjold et al., 1991 ). We
conclude that this IgAd recognizes LPS efficiently only if
it is presented as a self-assembled monolayer mimicking somehow the
bacterial outer membrane surface. This may be a common feature among
antibodies against carbohydrates, because their single-site affinities
are usually lower than those of anti-peptide antibodies (Vyas,
1991 ).
The fact that the slope of the binding curves is steeper than the fit
with the simple Langmuir adsorption model is consistent with reduced
diffusion of free IgAd in the vicinity of bound
IgAd at the surface. This could be caused by antibody
aggregation due to the increased antibody concentration near the
antigenic surface, an effect which has been observed for IgGs binding
to lipid monolayers (Uzgiris and Kornberg, 1983 ; Wright et
al., 1988 ). The tendency of IgA to aggregate has been shown for
IgA in solution (see ``Results''). The molar heat of binding found in
the calorimetry experiments ( 1.9 kcal/mol) represents only a small
part of the free energy of binding ( 8 kcal/mol, deduced from the
binding constant), suggesting that the IgA-LPS interaction in detergent
solution is entropically driven. A pronounced entropy contribution to
binding has been reported for another antibody-oligosaccharide
interaction and been explained by solvent displacement upon binding
(Sigurskjold et al., 1991 ).
SPR measurements showed that SC does not change the affinity of IgAs to
LPS monolayers, a result which is confirmed by the data from specific
ELISA measurements. This observation is of importance, because changes
in the constant part of an antibody can alter its binding constant
toward an antigen-presenting surface. This has been shown for IgGs of
different subclasses binding to a N-acetylglucosamine
surface (Cooper et al., 1994 ). The association of SC with
the IgA molecule might be important to protect against proteolysis or
simply reflect that it is easier to cleave and resynthesize the
poly-IgR receptor than to recycle it.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by research funds from Swiss
National Science Foundation, Biotechnology Priority Program, Grants
5002-34603, 5002-38009, and 5002-35180. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
''
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Institut Suisse de
Recherches Expérimentales sur le Cancer, Chemin des Boveresses
155, CH-1066 Epalinges, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-21-692-59-39; Fax:
41-21-652-69-33; E-mail: bcorthes{at}eliot.unil.ch.
1
The abbreviations used are: sIgA, secretory IgA;
IgA, immunoglobulin A; SC, secretory component; rSC, recombinant human
SC; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; SPR, surface plasmon resonance; ELISA,
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; FPLC, fast protein liquid
chromatography; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; IgG, immunoglobulin
G.
2
E. Lüllau, unpublished data.
3
B. Corthésy, unpublished data.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to P.-A. Ruffieux for
providing us with cell culture harvests, P. Pugeaud for assistance
during purification, R. Hovius for help with the calorimetric
measurements, M. Liley and C. Duschl for skillful advice in SPR, and Y. Hauyon for technical assistance.
REFERENCES
-
Apter, F. M.,
Michetti, P.,
Winner, L. S.,
Mack, J. A.,
Mekalanos, J. J.,
Neutra, M. R.
(1993)
Infect. Immun.
61,
5279-5285
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bain, C. D.,
Troughton, E. B.,
Tao, Y.-T.,
Evall, J.,
Whitesides, G.
M.,
Nuzzo, R. G.
(1989)
J. Am. Chem. Soc.
111,
321-335
-
Blanchard, T. G.,
Czinn, S. J.,
Maurer, R.,
Thomas, W. D.,
Soman, G.,
Nedrud, J. G.
(1995)
Infect. Immun.
63,
1394-1399
[Abstract]
-
Bouige, P.,
Iseaki, S.,
Pillot, J.
(1990)
Hybridoma
9,
519-526
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Brandenburg, K.
(1993)
Biophys. J.
64,
1215-1231
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Brandtzaeg, P.
(1970)
Immunochemistry
7,
127-130
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Carayannopoulos, L.,
Max, E. E.,
Capra, J. D.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
8348-8352
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cooper, L. J. N.,
Robertson, D.,
Granzow, R.,
Greenspan, N. S.
(1994)
Mol. Immunol.
31,
577-584
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Duschl, C., Sévin-Landais, A.-F., and Vogel, H. (1996)
Biophys. J., 70, 1985-1995
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fukuoka, S.,
Matsumoto, M.,
Azumi, R.,
Karube, I.
(1994)
Microbios
78,
169-176
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Goto, Y.,
Aki, K.
(1984)
Biochemistry
23,
6736-6744
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hendrickson, B. A.,
Conner, D. A.,
Ladd, D. J.,
Kendall, D.,
Casanova, J. E.,
Corthésy, B.,
Max, E. E.,
Neutra, M. R.,
Seidman, C. E.,
Seidman, J. G.
(1995)
J. Exp. Med.
182,
1905-1911
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Heremans, J. F.
(1974)
The Antigens
(Sela, M.,
eds)
, Vol 2, p. 365, Academic Press Inc., New York
-
Ishizaka, K.,
Ishizaka, T.,
Lee, E. H.,
Fudenberg, H.
(1965)
J. Immunol.
95,
197-206
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kalb, E.,
Frey, S.,
Tamm, L. K.
(1992)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1103,
307-316
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kerr, M. A.
(1990)
Biochem. J.
271,
285-296
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Knoll, W.
(1991)
Mat. Res. Soc. Bull.
16,
29-39
-
Koshland, M. E.
(1985)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
3,
425-453
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kretschmann, E.
(1972)
Opt. Commun.
6,
185-187
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lee, C. K.,
Weltzin, R.,
Soman, G.,
Georgakopoulos, K. M.,
Houle, D.
M.,
Monath, T. P.
(1994)
Infect. Immun.
62,
887-891
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lemaître-Coelho, I.,
Jackson, G. D.,
Vaerman, J.-P.
(1977)
Eur. J. Immunol.
7,
588-590
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lindh, E.,
Björk, I.
(1976)
Eur. J. Biochem.
62,
263-270
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mach, J.-P.
(1970)
Nature
228,
1278-1282
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mestecky, M.,
Kilian, M.
(1985)
Methods Enzymol.
116,
37-75
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mestecky, M.,
Lue, C.,
Russell, M. W.
(1991)
Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am.
20,
441-471
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Michetti, P.,
Mahan, M. J.,
Slauch, J. M.,
Mekalanos, J. J.,
Neutra, M.
R.
(1992)
Infect. Immun.
60,
1786-1792
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Parr, E. L.,
Bozzola, J. J.,
Parr, M. B.
(1995)
J. Immunol. Methods
180,
147-157
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rindisbacher, L.,
Cottet, S.,
Wittek, R.,
Kraehenbuhl, J.-P.,
Corthésy, B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14220-14228
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring
Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Schwarz, F. P.,
Tello, D.,
Goldbaum, F. A.,
Mariuzza, R. A.,
Poljak, R. J.
(1995)
Eur. J. Biochem.
228,
388-394
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sigurskjold, B. W.,
Altman, E.,
Bundle, D. R.
(1991)
Eur. J. Biochem.
197,
239-246
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Stoscheck, C. M.
(1990)
Methods Enzymol.
182,
50-68
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Taylor, H. P.,
Dimmock, N. J.
(1985)
J. Exp. Med.
161,
198-209
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Terrettaz, S.,
Stora, T.,
Duschl, C.,
Vogel, H.
(1993)
Langmuir
9,
1361-1369
[CrossRef]
-
Terskikh, A.,
Couty, S.,
Pélegrin, A.,
Hardman, N.,
Hunziker, W.,
Mach, J.-P.
(1995)
Mol. Immunol.
31,
1313-1319
-
Tsai, C.-M.,
Frasch, C. E.
(1982)
Anal. Biochem.
119,
115-119
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ulman, A.
(1991)
An Introduction to Ultrathin Organic Films
, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
-
Underdown, B. J.,
Schiff, J. M.
(1986)
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
4,
389-417
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Uzgiris, E. E.,
Kornberg, R. D.
(1983)
Nature
301,
125-129
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Vaerman, J.-P.
(1972)
Res. Immunochem. Immunobiol.
3,
1-95
-
Vaerman, J.-P.
(1995)
Immunol. Invest.
24,
631-641
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
van den Heuvel, D. J.,
Kooyman, R. P. H.,
Drijfhout, J. W.,
Welling, G. W.
(1993)
Anal. Biochem.
215,
223-230
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Vyas, N. K.
(1991)
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
1,
732-740
[CrossRef]
-
Weicker, J.,
Underdown, B. J.
(1975)
J. Immunol.
114,
1337-1344
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Weltzin, R.,
Hsu, S. A.,
Mittler, E. S.,
Georgakopoulos, K. M.,
Monath, T. P.
(1994)
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
38,
2785-2791
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Winner, L., III,
Mack, J.,
Weltzin, R.,
Mekalanos, J. J.,
Kraehenbuhl, J.-P.,
Neutra, M. R.
(1991)
Infect. Immun.
59,
977-982
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wiseman, T.,
Williston, S.,
Brandts, J. F.,
Lin, L.-N.
(1989)
Anal. Biochem.
179,
131-137
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Woodard, C. S.,
Splawski, J. B.,
Goldblum, R. M.,
Denney, R. M.
(1984)
J. Immunol.
133,
2116-2125
[Abstract]
-
Wright, L. L.,
Palmer, A. G.,
Thompson, N. L.
(1988)
Biophys. J.
54,
463-470
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. N. Dharmasena, S. J. Krebs, and R. K. Taylor
Characterization of a novel protective monoclonal antibody that recognizes an epitope common to Vibrio cholerae Ogawa and Inaba serotypes
Microbiology,
July 1, 2009;
155(7):
2353 - 2364.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. A. Kadaoui and B. Corthesy
Secretory IgA Mediates Bacterial Translocation to Dendritic Cells in Mouse Peyer's Patches with Restriction to Mucosal Compartment
J. Immunol.,
December 1, 2007;
179(11):
7751 - 7757.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Bonner, C. Perrier, B. Corthesy, and S. J. Perkins
Solution Structure of Human Secretory Component and Implications for Biological Function
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 8, 2007;
282(23):
16969 - 16980.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. E. Fasching, T. Grossman, B. Corthesy, A. G. Plaut, J. N. Weiser, and E. N. Janoff
Impact of the Molecular Form of Immunoglobulin A on Functional Activity in Defense against Streptococcus pneumoniae
Infect. Immun.,
April 1, 2007;
75(4):
1801 - 1810.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Corthesy, Y. Benureau, C. Perrier, C. Fourgeux, N. Parez, H. Greenberg, and I. Schwartz-Cornil
Rotavirus Anti-VP6 Secretory Immunoglobulin A Contributes to Protection via Intracellular Neutralization but Not via Immune Exclusion
J. Virol.,
November 1, 2006;
80(21):
10692 - 10699.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. R. Peters, E. L. Calvert, E. J. Hall, and M. J. Day
Measurement of Immunoglobulin Concentrations in the Feces of Healthy Dogs
Clin. Vaccine Immunol.,
September 1, 2004;
11(5):
841 - 848.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. J. Mantis, M. C. Cheung, K. R. Chintalacharuvu, J. Rey, B. Corthesy, and M. R. Neutra
Selective Adherence of IgA to Murine Peyer's Patch M Cells: Evidence for a Novel IgA Receptor
J. Immunol.,
August 15, 2002;
169(4):
1844 - 1851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Sandin, S. Linse, T. Areschoug, J. M. Woof, J. Reinholdt, and G. Lindahl
Isolation and Detection of Human IgA Using a Streptococcal IgA-Binding Peptide
J. Immunol.,
August 1, 2002;
169(3):
1357 - 1364.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Crottet, M. C. Peitsch, C. Servis, and B. Corthesy
Covalent Homodimers of Murine Secretory Component Induced by Epitope Substitution Unravel the Capacity of the Polymeric Ig Receptor to Dimerize Noncovalently in the Absence of IgA Ligand
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 29, 1999;
274(44):
31445 - 31455.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Crottet and B. Corthesy
Mapping the Interaction Between Murine IgA and Murine Secretory Component Carrying Epitope Substitutions Reveals a Role of Domains II and III in Covalent Binding to IgA
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 29, 1999;
274(44):
31456 - 31462.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Villeneuve, A. Boutonnier, L. A. Mulard, and J.-M. Fournier
Immunochemical characterization of an Ogawa-Inaba common antigenic determinant of Vibrio cholerae O1
Microbiology,
September 1, 1999;
145(9):
2477 - 2484.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Berdoz, C. T. Blanc, M. Reinhardt, J.-P. Kraehenbuhl, and B. Corthesy
In vitro comparison of the antigen-binding and stability properties of the various molecular forms of IgA antibodies assembled and produced in CHO cells
PNAS,
March 16, 1999;
96(6):
3029 - 3034.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Crottet and B. Corthesy
Secretory Component Delays the Conversion of Secretory IgA into Antigen-Binding Competent F(ab')2: A Possible Implication for Mucosal Defense
J. Immunol.,
November 15, 1998;
161(10):
5445 - 5453.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Wang, S. Villeneuve, J. Zhang, P.-s. Lei, C. E. Miller, P. Lafaye, F. Nato, S. C. Szu, A. Karpas, S. Bystricky, et al.
On the Antigenic Determinants of the Lipopolysaccharides of Vibrio cholerae O:1, Serotypes Ogawa and Inaba
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 30, 1998;
273(5):
2777 - 2783.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Corthesy, M. Kaufmann, A. Phalipon, M. Peitsch, MarianR. Neutra, and J.-P. Kraehenbuhl
A Pathogen-specific Epitope Inserted into Recombinant Secretory Immunoglobulin A Is Immunogenic by the Oral Route
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 27, 1996;
271(52):
33670 - 33677.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|