|
Volume 271, Number 27,
Issue of July 5, 1996
pp. 16363-16368
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Catalytic Activity of Type II Iodothyronine 5 -Deiodinase
Polypeptide Is Dependent upon a Cyclic AMP Activation Factor*
(Received for publication, November 16, 1995, and in revised form, March 1, 1996)
Marjorie
Safran
,
Alan P.
Farwell
and
Jack L.
Leonard
From the Molecular Endocrinology Laboratory, Departments of
Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, and Molecular and Cellular Physiology,
University of Massachusetts Medical School,
Worcester, Massachusetts 01655
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Type II iodothyronine 5 -deiodinase is an
~200-kDa multimeric enzyme in the brain that catalyzes the
deiodination of thyroxine (T4) to its active metabolite,
3,5,3 -triiodothyronine. In astrocytes, cAMP stimulation is
required to express catalytically active type II iodothyronine
5 -deiodinase. The affinity ligand
N-bromoacetyl-L-T4 specifically
labels the 29-kDa substrate-binding subunit (p29) of this enzyme in
cAMP-stimulated astrocytes. To determine the requirements for
cAMP-induced activation of this enzyme, we optimized
N-bromoacetyl-L-T4 labeling of p29
in astrocytes lacking type II iodothyronine 5 -deiodinase activity and
examined the effects of cAMP on the hydrodynamic properties and
subcellular location of the enzyme. We show that the p29 subunit is
expressed in unstimulated astrocytes and requires 10-fold higher
concentrations of
N-bromoacetyl-L-T4 to achieve
incorporation levels equal to those of p29 in cAMP-stimulated cells.
Gel filtration showed that p29 was part of a multimeric
membrane-associated complex in both cAMP-stimulated and unstimulated
astrocytes and that cAMP stimulation led to an increase of ~60 kDa in
the mass of the holoenzyme. In unstimulated astrocytes, p29 resides in
the perinuclear space. Cyclic AMP stimulation leads to the
translocation of p29 to the plasma membrane coincident with the
appearance of deiodinating activity. These data show that
cAMP-dependent activation of type II iodothyronine
5 -deiodinase activity results from the synthesis of additional
activating factor(s) that associates with inactive enzyme and leads to
the translocation of enzyme polypeptide(s) from the perinuclear space
to the plasma membrane.
INTRODUCTION
Type II iodothyronine 5 -deiodinase
(5 D-II)1 catalyzes the metabolism of
T4 to its active metabolite, T3, in the brain
(1, 2). In astrocytes, 5 D-II is a multimeric protein with marked
molecular asymmetry and has an apparent molecular mass of ~200 kDa
(3). 5 D-II-like catalytic activity has also been reported in the
pituitary and brown adipose tissue (1); however, the hydrodynamic
properties of the responsible protein(s) are unknown. One unique
feature of brain 5 D-II is the rapid, thyroxine-dependent
regulation of catalytic activity observed both in the intact animal and
in cell culture (4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9). Cyclic AMP-stimulated astrocytes express
abundant 5 D-II catalytic activity (10) and faithfully mimic the
thyroid hormone-induced changes seen in vivo. For example,
removal of thyroid hormone from the culture medium results in a 10-fold
increase in 5 D-II activity in cAMP-stimulated astrocytes (7). This
increase in enzyme activity results from slowed enzyme inactivation and
not from increased enzyme synthesis (7, 11). Acute T4
replacement leads to a rapid loss of 5 D-II activity that is
independent of gene transcription or protein synthesis (7), but can be
blocked by cytochalasin-induced disruption of the actin
cytoskeleton (7, 12).
The alkylating thyroid hormone analog
N-bromoacetyl-T4 (BrAcT4) has proven
invaluable for identifying deiodinase polypeptides (8, 13, 14). Under
specific conditions, three to five astrocyte proteins contain >95% of
the incorporated BrAcT4 label, and two of these have been
identified. A 55-kDa affinity-labeled protein (p55) is the subunit
monomer of protein-disulfide isomerase (15). The 29-kDa
affinity-labeled protein (p29) was identified as the substrate-binding
protein of 5 D-II. The following criteria were used to establish the
identity of the p29 protein. (i) An increase in affinity labeling
paralleled the cAMP-stimulated increase in 5 D-II catalytic activity;
(ii) the quantity of BrAcT4 incorporated was directly
proportional to 5 D-II activity; (iii) affinity labeling was
competitively inhibited by substrates T4 and
rT3, but not the product T3; and (iv) the rate
of inactivation of 5 D-II by the affinity label equaled the rate of
BrAcT4 incorporation into p29 (8, 11, 12). Subsequently,
the T4-dependent increase in 5 D-II
inactivation was shown to coincide with the migration of p29 from the
plasma membrane to the endosomal storage pool, and the rate of loss of
enzyme activity equaled that of the internalization of p29 (11).
Cytochalasin-mediated depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton
blocked both T4-dependent enzyme inactivation
and p29 internalization (11, 12).
In addition to the well characterized p29 protein of 5 D-II, an
additional 29-kDa protein was weakly labeled by BrAcT4 in
astrocytes lacking 5 D-II catalytic activity (8). Whether this protein
was related to p29 or was another T4-binding protein or an
artifact of affinity labeling (16) was not known. We therefore
re-examined the conditions of p29 affinity labeling, compared p29 with
the 29-kDa polypeptide in unstimulated astrocytes, and evaluated the
mechanism of cAMP activation of 5 D-II.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
All chemicals were of the highest grade available. Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium was obtained from Life Technologies, Inc., and
supplemented bovine calf serum was from Hyclone Laboratories (Logan,
UT). N-Bromoacetyl-L-T3 and
BrAcT4 were obtained courtesy of Dr. Hans Cahnmann
(National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD).
Methods
Cell Culture
Astrocytes were obtained from 1-day-old
neonatal rat cerebral hemispheres as described previously (10).
Astrocytes were grown in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2
and 95% air in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 15 mM sodium bicarbonate, 33 mM glucose, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 15 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 10%
(v/v) supplemented bovine calf serum, 50 units/ml penicillin, and 90 µg/ml streptomycin. Cells were passaged weekly and used between
passages 1 and 3. For all experiments, unless otherwise noted, maximal
5 D-II activity was induced in confluent monolayers by growth in
serum-free medium for 24 h, followed by an additional 16 h
with 1 mM dibutyryl cAMP and 100 nM
hydrocortisone (10).
Affinity Labeling of
5 D-II
BrAc[125I]T4 was prepared by
radioiodination of
N-bromoacetyl-L-T3 as described
previously (13). Cells were affinity-labeled at 37 °C with 1.3 nM BrAc[125I]T4 (specific
activity of 2200 Ci/mmol) in buffered Hanks' solution containing 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, unless otherwise indicated. After a
20-min incubation, cells were washed free of unincorporated affinity
ligand, scraped from the dish, and collected by centrifugation. Cells
were resuspended in 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, containing 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (lysis buffer) and
sonicated. Either cell lysates were used directly for SDS-PAGE
analysis, or crude microsomal preparations were obtained by
centrifuging the lysate for 30 min at 250,000 × g through a
0.8 M sucrose cushion. Microsomes were resuspended by
trituration in lysis buffer and used as described below.
Gel Filtration of BrAc[125I]T4-labeled
p29
Microsomal preparations from affinity-labeled astrocytes were
solubilized in 5 mM taurodeoxycholate, and the detergent
extracts were clarified by centrifugation for 30 min at 250,000 × g. The resultant supernatant was separated on a 90 × 1.5-cm
Sephacryl S-300 column equilibrated in 50 mM
NH4Ac, pH 7.0, containing 1 mM dithiothreitol,
0.1 mM EDTA, and 5 mM taurodeoxycholate at a
flow rate of 10 ml/h, and 1-ml fractions were collected. The
detergent-soluble extracts from microsomes isolated from 3 × 108 cells were used for each separation, and 100-µl
aliquots of selected fractions were analyzed directly by SDS-PAGE. The
distribution of p29 was quantitated either by densitometry or by
counting the electrophoretically resolved p29 bands in a -counter.
The column was standardized using thyroglobulin, -amylase,
rabbit IgG, -galactosidase, ovalbumin, and cytochrome c
with dextran blue and 3H2O used for the void
volume and total volume, respectively.
Peptide Digests
Affinity-labeled 29-kDa proteins from
cAMP-stimulated and unstimulated astrocytes were isolated from
microsomal preparations by SDS-PAGE on 8-14% gradient gels as
described previously (3). The 29-kDa proteins were cleaved directly in
the gel slices with Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease or
cyanogen bromide using a modification of the Cleveland method (see
Refs. 3, 17, and 18). Digestion products were separated on a 15%
SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Peptide fingerprints were compared by
autoradiography.
Generation of Anti-p29 Antibody
Cyclic AMP-stimulated
astrocytes (~109 cells) were affinity-radiolabeled with
BrAc[125I]T4 (1 × 106 cpm/pmol)
for 15 min, followed by a 15-min incubation with excess 1 µM BrAcT4 to quantitatively label the p29
polypeptide (19, 20). Microsomes were prepared by discontinuous sucrose
gradient centrifugation, and the membrane preparation was solubilized
with 5 mM taurodeoxycholate.
BrAc[125I]T4-labeled proteins were isolated
by immunoprecipitation with anti-T4 IgG (12), and the
radiolabeled proteins in the immune pellet were separated by
preparative SDS-PAGE. The gel fragment containing p29 was homogenized
in 125 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 6.8, mixed with an equal
volume of complete Freund's adjuvant and used to immunize 2.2-kg
female New Zealand White rabbits. Rabbits were boosted 3 weeks later
using the same preparation of p29 homogenized in 125 mM
Tris buffer, pH 6.8, alone. Sera containing anti-p29 antibody were
identified by Western blotting against purified p29 and used for
immunoprecipitation of solubilized affinity-labeled p29- and
5 D-II-containing vesicles. Subcellular localization of 5 D-II was
determined by immunocytochemistry as detailed in the figure
legends.
Endocytotic Vesicle Isolation
Affinity-labeled astrocytes
grown in serum-free medium were treated with 10 nM
T4 for 30 min to initiate endocytosis of the
5 D-II-containing vesicles (11, 12). Cells were scraped from the dish,
collected by centrifugation, and then lysed by three freeze-thaw
cycles. Cell lysates were centrifuged (805,000 × gmin) through 16% Percoll gradients in 250 mM sucrose in 10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7, containing 10 mM dithiothreitol and 1 mM EDTA,
and 0.5-ml fractions were collected. Fractions containing the endosomes
(>80% of internalized 5 D-II (12)) were pooled and then incubated for
30 min at 4 °C with magnetic beads (Dynabeads, Dynal, Inc.) coated
with purified IgG according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Control incubations included magnetic beads coated with bovine serum
albumin. The beads were then collected; washed three times with 175 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, containing 5 mg/ml
bovine serum albumin; and resuspended in SDS-PAGE sample buffer.
Proteins were eluted from the beads by boiling for 5 min and resolved
by SDS-PAGE.
Immunocytochemical Analysis of p29 in Astrocytes
Astrocytes
were grown on poly-D-lysine-coated coverslips as described
previously (12) and treated as indicated in the figure legends. Cells
were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with Triton
X-100 as detailed previously (12). BrAcT4-labeled proteins
and p29 were visualized by indirect immunofluorescence using rabbit
anti-T4 IgG and rabbit anti-p29 IgG, respectively; immune
complexes were identified with Texas Red-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG.
Cells were imaged by confocal microscopy as described previously (12).
Micrographs shown are representative of 30-40 independent fields.
RESULTS
Characterization of BrAcT4-labeled 29-kDa Protein(s) in
Astrocytes
One criterion that established p29 as the
substrate-binding subunit of 5 D-II was the observation that the
quantity of affinity-labeled p29 was directly proportional to 5 D-II
catalytic activity (8). However, in unstimulated cells lacking 5 D-II
activity, another 29-kDa protein was also weakly labeled with
BrAcT4. To characterize this latter protein, we established
conditions that optimized the BrAcT4 labeling of this
T4-binding protein. The effect of increasing concentrations
of BrAc[125I]T4 on affinity labeling of
astrocyte polypeptides is shown in Fig. 1. At low
concentrations, BrAcT4 incorporation into the 29-kDa
protein in unstimulated cells was only 15% of that observed for p29 in
cAMP-stimulated astrocytes as reported previously (8). At increasing
concentrations of affinity ligand, this differential labeling pattern
was progressively overcome, and little or no difference in affinity
labeling of the 29-kDa protein(s) was observed at concentrations
greater than ~2 nM
BrAc[125I]T4. These data identify an
affinity-labeled 29-kDa protein in astrocytes lacking 5 D-II activity
and establish the labeling conditions necessary to allow comparisons
between this protein and the p29 protein in cAMP-stimulated cells.
Fig. 1.
Effect of increasing concentrations of
BrAcT4 on labeled p29 from stimulated and unstimulated
astrocytes. Confluent astrocyte monomers were grown overnight in
serum-free medium with or without 1 mM dibutyryl cAMP and
100 nM hydrocortisone. Cells were incubated with increasing
concentrations of BrAc[125I]T4, and the
affinity-labeled proteins were identified by autoradiography after
separation by SDS-PAGE. BrAc[125I]T4
incorporation into p29 was determined by scanning densitometry.
Radiolabeled p29 proteins are shown above the quantification of
affinity label incorporation into p29 from stimulated ( ) and
unstimulated ( ) cells. AU, absorbance units.
To establish the relationship(s) between these two 29-kDa polypeptides,
we used limited proteolysis and peptide fingerprinting. Cyclic
AMP-stimulated and untreated astrocytes were affinity-labeled with 10 nM BrAcT4 for 20 min, conditions that
effectively label both p29 and the 29-kDa protein in unstimulated
astrocytes (see Fig. 1). The 29-kDa proteins were then isolated by
SDS-PAGE, fragments were prepared by CNBr cleavage or V8 protease
proteolysis, and the peptides were separated by SDS-PAGE. As shown in
Fig. 2, the peptide fingerprints of the p29 protein in
cAMP-stimulated astrocytes were identical to those obtained for the
29-kDa protein in unstimulated cells, indicating that these two
proteins are closely related, if not identical.
Fig. 2.
Peptide fragmentation patterns obtained after
V8 protease (A) or CNBr (B) digestion of p29
from stimulated and unstimulated astrocytes. Gel slices containing
affinity-labeled p29 were digested as described under ``Experimental
Procedures'' and separated by SDS-PAGE, and the affinity-labeled
proteins were identified by autoradiography. The protein maps shown are
representative of three separate experiments.
Hydrodynamic Properties of p29 in cAMP-stimulated and Unstimulated
Astrocytes
One possible explanation for the inability of
unstimulated astrocytes to catalyze 5 -deiodination is that the
substrate-binding subunit (p29) is dissociated from the holoenzyme.
Since p29 is part of an ~200-kDa multimeric complex, cAMP-induced
protein-protein interactions could result in the formation of a
functional enzyme by causing p29 to associate with the other, yet to be
identified subunits in the holoenzyme. Microsomal preparations of
affinity-labeled proteins from cAMP-stimulated and unstimulated
astrocytes were solubilized in taurodeoxycholate and separated by gel
filtration on a Sephacryl S-300 column, and the distribution of
BrAc[125I]T4-labeled p29 was determined as
described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Shown in Fig.
3 is a representative chromatogram of p29 in
unstimulated and cAMP-stimulated glial cells. The p29 subunit in
cAMP-stimulated cells was associated with a complex of ~200 kDa,
consistent with previous estimates of holoenzyme size (3). In contrast,
in unstimulated cells, p29 was associated with a complex that was ~60
kDa smaller than that in cAMP-stimulated cells. This difference in
chromatographic behavior of the p29 protein from the two cell
populations was consistently observed (Table I). Since
cAMP-induced 5 D-II catalytic activity requires both transcription and
translation (10), these data suggest that cAMP induces the synthesis of
an essential activating factor that associates with the inactive 5 D-II
complex. There was little or no evidence of p29 monomers or dimers in
the chromatograms from either the cAMP-stimulated or unstimulated
astrocytes, indicating that most, if not all, of p29 is contained in
the multimeric holoenzyme.
Fig. 3.
Molecular sieve chromatography of
BrAc[125I]T4-labeled 5 D-II from stimulated
( ) and unstimulated ( ) astrocytes.
Taurodeoxycholate-solubilized astrocyte proteins were separated on
Sephacryl S-300, and the fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE as
described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The migration of 5 D-II
was determined from that of affinity-labeled p29. The following protein
standards were used: thyroglobulin (Tg; 670,000 kDa),
-amylase ( -am; 200,000 kDa), rabbit IgG (158,000 kDa),
-galactosidase ( -gal; 130,000 kDa), ovalbumin
(oval; 44,000 kDa), and cytochrome c
(cyto-C; 12500 kDa). AU, absorbance units.
Table I.
Gel filtration analysis of BrAc[125I]T4-labeled p29
from unstimulated and cAMP-stimulated glial cells
| Run
No. |
Column |
Vt-V0 |
p29
(Kav)
|
| Unstimulated |
cAMP-stimulated
|
|
|
|
(ml)
|
| 1 |
I |
51.5 |
0.25 |
0.20
|
| 2 |
I |
|
0.23 |
0.19
|
| 3 |
II |
68 |
0.29 |
0.11 |
| 4 |
II |
|
|
0.22 |
|
Characterization of Anti-p29 Antisera
To develop a
5 D-II-specific immunological probe, anti-p29 antibodies were generated
against partially purified p29 from cAMP-stimulated cells as described
under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Control studies showed that the
anti-p29 antibody was not directed against T4 per
se since anti-p29 IgG failed to immunoprecipitate T4
(Table II). This eliminated any potential problems of
the cross-reactivity of this antibody with other
BrAcT4-labeled proteins.
Table II.
Immunoprecipitation of [125I]T4
| IgG |
Immunoprecipitated |
|
|
%
|
| Anti-p29 |
0.9 |
| Preimmune rabbit |
3.1
|
| Anti-T4 |
48.7 |
|
The specificity of the anti-p29 antibody is shown in Fig.
4A. As expected, in control
immunoprecipitations, anti-T4 IgG recognized all of the
BrAcT4-labeled proteins (second lane) (11, 12),
while anti-p29 IgG preferentially immunoprecipitated the p29
polypeptide (third lane). We then determined if anti-p29 IgG
recognized the holoenzyme in its native environment. 5 D-II-containing
endosomes were prepared from cAMP-stimulated astrocytes by density
gradient centrifugation as detailed previously (11, 12) and incubated
with immobilized anti-p29 IgG or immobilized normal rabbit IgG as
described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' As shown in Fig.
4B (first lane), the total endosomal pool from
cAMP-stimulated astrocytes contains three prominent
BrAcT4-labeled proteins (p55, p29, and p18). Previous work
has shown that both p55 and p18 are nonspecifically labeled with
BrAcT4, while affinity labeling of p29 is selectively
blocked by 5 D-II substrates, but not products (8). Immunopurification
with anti-p29 IgG-coated beads specifically isolated vesicles
containing p29 (third lane), while normal rabbit IgG
controls failed to enrich vesicles containing any
BrAcT4-labeled protein (second lane). Consistent
with previous reports (11, 12), both the p55 and p18 affinity-labeled
proteins were also associated with the immunopurified endosome since
the anti-p29 antibody does not recognize either p55 or p18 from
detergent-solubilized preparations (see Fig. 4A). These data
indicate that the anti-p29 antibody recognizes both detergent-soluble
and membrane-bound forms of the p29 subunit of 5 D-II.
Fig. 4.
Autoradiograms of immunoprecipitated
BrAc[125I]T4-labeled astrocyte proteins.
A, taurodeoxycholate-solubilized affinity-labeled astrocyte
proteins (L) were immunoprecipitated using
anti-T4 IgG (T4) and anti-p29 IgG
(p29), and the purified proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE.
B, Percoll fractions containing the endosomal pool
(E) were obtained as described under ``Experimental
Procedures'' and then incubated with either normal rabbit IgG-linked
(IgG) or anti-p29-linked (p29) magnetic beads.
The isolated vesicle proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE.
Immunocytochemical Localization of the p29 Subunit of 5 D-II in
cAMP-stimulated and Unstimulated Astrocytes
In cAMP-stimulated
astrocytes, catalytically active 5 D-II is a plasma membrane enzyme,
and T4 regulates 5 D-II activity by initiating the
translocation of the enzyme from the plasma membrane to the perinuclear
space, where it is catalytically inactive (11, 12). Since the p29
subunit is constitutively expressed and part of a multimeric complex in
both cAMP-stimulated and unstimulated astrocytes, we determined whether
subcellular location played a role in the cAMP induction of
catalytically active 5 D-II.
A panel of representative photomicrographs of p29 immunoreactivity is
shown in Fig. 5. Preimmune serum controls showed no
specific immunostaining in cAMP-stimulated, BrAcT4-labeled
astrocytes. Anti-p29 IgG yielded intense staining in cAMP-stimulated,
BrAcT4-labeled astrocytes, presumably over the cell
membranes since p29 is an integral membrane protein (8, 12).
Interestingly, in the nonaffinity-labeled, cAMP-stimulated astrocytes,
the immunoreactivity of p29 was much less than that in
BrAcT4-labeled cells, suggesting that the epitope
recognized by anti-p29 IgG requires affinity labeling for maximal
exposure.
Fig. 5.
Identification of p29 in control and
BrAcT4-labeled cAMP-stimulated astrocytes. Dibutyryl
cAMP-stimulated astrocytes were grown in the absence of thyroid hormone
and affinity-labeled as indicated. Immunocytochemistry was done as
described under ``Experimental Procedures'' using preimmune rabbit
serum (NRS) and anti-p29 antisera in nonaffinity-labeled
cells ( BrAcT4) and affinity-labeled cells
(+BrAcT4).
Since p29 constitutes ~50% of the affinity-labeled protein in
astrocytes (8) and the BrAcT4-labeled proteins are readily
recognized by anti-T4 antibodies, we compared the
distributions of anti-T4 and anti-p29 immunoreactivity in
astrocytes. Shown in Fig. 6 are representative confocal
micrographs of the effects of T4 on the subcellular
distribution of immunoreactive p29 in BrAcT4-labeled,
cAMP-stimulated astrocytes. As previously reported (11, 12),
anti-T4 IgG shows punctate staining along the cell
periphery. Since the nucleus of an astrocyte is elliptical with a long
axis of ~8-10 µm and the astrocyte, while polygonal in shape, is
~30 µm in diameter, the nucleus occupies only 25-40% of the
cross-sectional area of any given cell, and the remaining intracellular
space is filled with other organelles and cell sap. Thus,
anti-T4 IgG immunoreactivity is concentrated over the
plasma membrane in the hypothyroid cAMP-stimulated astrocyte, and
little, if any, staining is present in the cell interior (Fig.
6A). After 20 min of T4 treatment (Fig.
6B), the BrAcT4-labeled protein(s) were lost
from the cell membrane and had migrated to the perinuclear space, with
occasional punctates observed over the cell nucleus. Since p29 is a
membrane-associated protein (8, 11, 12) and, when internalized, is a
component of the endosomal vesicle, this pattern of immunoreactivity is
consistent with the translocation of affinity-labeled 5 D-II from the
plasma membrane to the endosomal pool. Parallel astrocyte cultures
stained with anti-p29 IgG exhibited identical patterns of rim
immunostaining in hypothyroid cells (Fig. 6C) and showed the
relocation of the immunoreactive protein to the perinuclear space in
the T4-treated astrocytes (Fig. 6D). These data
confirm that anti-p29 IgG recognizes the BrAcT4-labeled p29
subunit of the 5 D-II holoenzyme in intact cells.
Fig. 6.
Effects of acute T4 treatment on
distribution of immunoreactive 5 D-II. Dibutyryl cAMP-stimulated
astrocytes were grown in the absence of thyroid hormone and
affinity-labeled for 20 min. Cells in A and C
were fixed immediately, while cells in B and D
were incubated with 10 nM T4 at 37 °C for 20 min before fixation. All cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde,
permeabilized, and rehydrated, and immunocytochemistry was done
with anti-T4 IgG (A and B) or anti-p29 IgG
(C and D). The immune complexes were visualized
using Texas Red-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (12). The nucleus
is indicated (N).
Anti-p29 antiserum was then used to determine the subcellular
localization of this 5 D-II subunit in unstimulated astrocytes grown in
thyroid hormone-free medium (Fig. 7). In unstimulated
astrocytes, p29 is found in the perinuclear space (P), and
little, if any, specific immunoreactivity is associated with the plasma
membrane (see arrows). In contrast, in cAMP-stimulated
cells, the majority of immunoreactive p29 is found associated with the
cell periphery, presumably the plasma membrane (see arrows),
and little remains in the perinuclear space. These data suggest that
cAMP stimulation results in the translocation of p29 from the
perinuclear space to the plasma membrane, coincident with the
appearance of catalytically active 5 D-II.
Fig. 7.
Confocal micrographs of 5 D-II in stimulated
and unstimulated astrocytes. Astrocytes were grown in the absence
( DBC) and presence (+DBC) of dibutyryl cAMP,
affinity-labeled with BrAcT4, and stained with anti-p29
antisera as described for Fig. 5. Arrows point to the plasma
membrane; the nucleus (N) and perinuclear space
(P) are indicated. The bar equals 10 µm.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we show that p29, the substrate-binding subunit of
5 D-II, is constitutively expressed and resides, along with other
5 D-II components, in membrane vesicles located in the perinuclear
space of unstimulated astrocytes. Cyclic nucleotides induce the
appearance of catalytically active 5 D-II coincident with translocation
of p29 to the plasma membrane. In addition, a cAMP-activating factor(s)
is synthesized and becomes associated with the other enzyme components
that are stored in vesicles located in the perinuclear space.
The identification of p29 as the substrate-binding subunit of 5 D-II
was based upon multiple criteria, including a direct proportionality
between the quantity of BrAcT4-labeled p29 and 5 D-II
activity and the reciprocal relationship between inactivation and p29
labeling. In fact, the rate of enzyme inactivation is identical to the
rate of affinity labeling of the p29 subunit (8). At the concentrations
of BrAcT4 used in the early studies (8), minimal background
labeling of 29-kDa protein(s) was observed in catalytically inactive
cells. In this study, we show that cAMP increases the avidity of p29
for BrAcT4 by >10-fold. This increase in apparent binding
affinity may be due, in part, to the translocation of the enzyme to the
cell surface in close proximity to the sites of entry of the affinity
ligand and/or to the low Km for T4 of
the catalytically active enzyme (21).
The presence of the p29 subunit of 5 D-II in astrocytes lacking the
catalytically active enzyme was confirmed by peptide mapping, gel
filtration, and immunocytochemistry. Peptide fingerprints of the p29
proteins in unstimulated and cAMP-stimulated astrocytes were identical.
Gel filtration revealed that p29 was a component of a larger
membrane-associated complex and was not present as a monomer or dimer
in either the unstimulated or cAMP-stimulated astrocyte. These data
show that the substrate-binding subunit of 5 D-II is constitutively
synthesized and integrated into vesicular storage membranes of the
cell. Interestingly, cAMP induction of catalytically active 5 D-II was
accompanied by an increase in the molecular mass of this p29-containing
complex, suggesting that an additional cAMP-activating factor(s) is
responsible for the generation of active 5 D-II.
The molecular events responsible for the cAMP-dependent
generation of 5 D-II activity in astrocytes are slowly emerging. Cyclic
AMP induces expression of an activating factor that associates with the
inactive 5 D-II complex in storage vesicles and results in an increase
in holoenzyme size. This is also accompanied by a marked difference in
the subcellular location of the enzyme. Whether the cAMP-induced
activation factor is integrated into the 5 D-II complex prior to
translocation to the plasma membrane or becomes associated with a
5 D-II complex that is continually recycled to the plasma membrane is
unknown. However, little, if any, immunoreactive p29 is located in the
plasma membrane of unstimulated astrocytes, suggesting that recycling
of the ``inactive'' 5 D-II complex is minor. Thus, the
cAMP-activating factor is required for the enzyme to relocate to its
site of action at the plasma membrane.
The regulation of 5 D-II activity in cultured astrocytes is a complex
process that requires cAMP-induced protein synthesis, cAMP-stimulated
translocation of an inactive 5 D-II complex from intracellular storage
pools to the plasma membrane, and microfilament-based endocytosis. In
T4-deficient astrocytes, the biological half-life of the
catalytically active enzyme is identical to that of the p29 polypeptide
(see accompanying paper (31)). However, in T4-replete
cells, p29 is rapidly internalized by endocytosis, and the biological
half-life of catalytically active 5 D-II is equal to the rate of p29
endocytosis, while the degradation of the p29 polypeptide remains
unchanged under hormone-free or hormone-containing conditions (11).
Since the cellular levels of p29 are not regulated by thyroid hormone
and p29 is present in astrocytes that do not catalyze 5 -deiodination,
then regulated expression of this substrate-binding subunit is not the
mechanism by which the levels of catalytically active 5 D-II are
controlled. Moreover, constitutive expression of p29 indicates that the
p29 subunit is not the essential cAMP-induced polypeptide. From
previous studies, we know that the cAMP-stimulated appearance of 5 D-II
activity requires the synthesis of an essential protein(s) (10), and it
appears that this cAMP-activating factor may be the short-lived protein
essential for 5 D-II catalysis. The demonstration that an essential
cAMP-dependent factor(s) is required to activate the enzyme
and target it to its site of action on the plasma membrane identifies
one of the other 5 D-II subunit polypeptides required for functional
5 D-II. In vivo, both the pineal gland (22, 23, 24) and the
limbic system (25) in the brain show catecholamine-induced increases in
5 D-II activity, suggesting that cAMP is likely to play an important
role in regulating the expression of a polypeptide that is essential
for 5 D-II catalysis, both in vivo and in cell culture.
Brain 5 D-II is the largest of the deiodinases, with a calculated
molecular mass of 200 kDa (3). Despite the recent cloning of an
~30-kDa frog selenoenzyme with kinetics similar to 5 D-II (26),
previous biological and biochemical evidence demonstrates that in the
mammalian brain, 5 D-II is not a selenoenzyme (27, 28, 29, 30). Two of the
required subunits of 5 D-II are now known, the p29 substrate-binding
subunit and an ~60-kDa cyclic AMP-inducible factor. Whether the
essential cyclic AMP-inducible factor is an integral part of the enzyme
or is merely required to target the enzyme to the plasma membrane
remains to be established.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant DK-38772 (to J. L. L.) and Clinical Investigator Award DK 02005 (to A. P. F.). The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Division of
Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Massachusetts Medical
Center, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, MA 01655-0308. Tel.:
508-856-3609; Fax: 508-856-6950.
1
The abbreviations used are: 5 D-II, type II
iodothyronine 5 -deiodinase; T4, thyroxine; T3,
3,5,3 -triiodothyronine; rT3 (reverse T3),
3,3 ,5 -triiodothyronine; BrAcT4,
N-bromoacetyl-L-thyroxine; PAGE, polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis.
REFERENCES
-
Leonard, J. L.,
Visser, T. J.
(1986)
Thyroid Hormone Metabolism
(Hennemann, G.,
eds)
, p. 189, Marcel Dekker
Inc.,
New York
-
Kaplan, M. M.
(1986)
Thyroid Hormone Metabolism
(Hennemann, G.,
eds)
, p. 231, Marcel Dekker
Inc., New York
-
Safran, M.,
Leonard, J. L.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
3233-3238
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Silva, J. E.,
Leonard, J. L.
(1985)
Endocrinology
116,
1627-1635
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Leonard, J. L.,
Kaplan, M. M.,
Visser, T. J.,
Silva, J. E.,
Larsen, P. R.
(1981)
Science
214,
571-573
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kaiser, C. A.,
Goumaz, M. O.,
Burger, A. G.
(1986)
Endocrinology
119,
762-770
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Leonard, J. L.,
Siegrist-Kaiser, C. A.,
Zuckerman, C. J.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
940-946
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Farwell, A. P.,
Leonard, J. L.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
20561-20567
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Halperin, Y.,
Shapiro, L. E.,
Surks, M. I.
(1994)
Endocrinology
135,
1464-1469
[Abstract]
-
Leonard, J. L.
(1988)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
151,
1164-1172
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Farwell, A. P.,
DiBenedetto, D. J.,
Leonard, J. L.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5055-5062
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Farwell, A. P.,
Lynch, R. M.,
Okulicz, W. C.,
Comi, A. M.,
Leonard, J. L.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
18546-18553
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Köhrle, J.,
Rasmussen, U. B.,
Ekenbarger, D. M.,
Alex, S.,
Rokos, H.,
Hesch, R. D.,
Leonard, J. L.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
6155-6163
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schoenmakers, C. H. H.,
Pigmans, I. G. A. J.,
Visser, T. J.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.
70,
173-180
-
Safran, M.,
Leonard, J. L.
(1991)
Endocrinology
129,
2011-2016
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wyss, M.,
Wallimann, T.,
Köhrle, J.
(1993)
Biochem. J.
291,
463-472
-
Cleveland, D. W.,
Fischer, S. G.,
Kirschner, M. W.,
Laemmli, U. K.
(1977)
J. Biol. Chem.
252,
1102-1106
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nikodem, V.,
Fresco, J. R.
(1979)
Anal. Biochem.
97,
382-386
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
de Duve, C.
(1975)
Science
189,
186-193
[Free Full Text]
-
Aronson, N. N.,
Touster, O.
(1974)
Methods Enzymol.
31,
90-102
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Visser, T. J.,
Leonard, J. L.,
Kaplan, M. M.,
Larsen, P. R.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
5080-5084
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Guerrero, J. M.,
Puig-Domingo, M.,
Reiter, R.
(1988)
Endocrinology
122,
236-241
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Osuna, C.,
Rubio, A.,
Guerrero, J. M.
(1993)
Experientia
(Basel)
49,
329-331
-
Rubio, A.,
Menendez Pelaez, A.,
Reiter, R. J.
(1993)
J. Pineal Res.
14,
53-59
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Riskind, P. N.,
Kolodny, J. M.,
Larsen, P. R.
(1987)
Brain Res.
420,
194-198
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Davey, J. C.,
Becker, K. B.,
Schneider, M. J.,
St,
Germain, D. L.,
Galton, V. A.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
26786-26792
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Behne, D.,
Hilmert, H.,
Scheid, S.,
Gessner, H.,
Elger, W.
(1988)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
966,
12-21
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Safran, M.,
Farwell, A. P.,
Leonard, J. L.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
13477-13480
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Berry, M. J.,
Kieffer, J. D.,
Larsen, P. R.
(1991)
Endocrinology
129,
550-552
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chanoine, J. P.,
Safran, M.,
Farwell, A. P.,
Tranter, P.,
Ekenbarger, D. M.,
Dubord, S.,
Alex, S.,
Arthur, J. R.,
Beckett, G. J.,
Braverman, L. E.,
Leonard, J. L.
(1992)
Endocrinology
131,
479-484
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Farwell, A. P.,
Safran, M.,
Dubord, S.,
Leonard, J. L.
(1996)
J. Biol. Chem.
271,
16369-16374
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Gereben, A. M. Zavacki, S. Ribich, B. W. Kim, S. A. Huang, W. S. Simonides, A. Zeold, and A. C. Bianco
Cellular and Molecular Basis of Deiodinase-Regulated Thyroid Hormone Signaling
Endocr. Rev.,
December 1, 2008;
29(7):
898 - 938.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Kohrle, F. Jakob, B. Contempre, and J. E. Dumont
Selenium, the Thyroid, and the Endocrine System
Endocr. Rev.,
December 1, 2005;
26(7):
944 - 984.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Curcio-Morelli, B. Gereben, A. M. Zavacki, B. W. Kim, S. Huang, J. W. Harney, P. R. Larsen, and A. C. Bianco
In Vivo Dimerization of Types 1, 2, and 3 Iodothyronine Selenodeiodinases
Endocrinology,
March 1, 2003;
144(3):
937 - 946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Montero-Pedrazuela, J. Bernal, and A. Guadano-Ferraz
Divergent Expression of Type 2 Deiodinase and the Putative Thyroxine-Binding Protein p29, in Rat Brain, Suggests that They Are Functionally Unrelated Proteins
Endocrinology,
March 1, 2003;
144(3):
1045 - 1052.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Mentuccia, L. Proietti-Pannunzi, K. Tanner, V. Bacci, T. I. Pollin, E. T. Poehlman, A. R. Shuldiner, and F. S. Celi
Association Between a Novel Variant of the Human Type 2 Deiodinase Gene Thr92Ala and Insulin Resistance: Evidence of Interaction With the Trp64Arg Variant of the {beta}-3-Adrenergic Receptor
Diabetes,
March 1, 2002;
51(3):
880 - 883.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Bianco, D. Salvatore, B. Gereben, M. J. Berry, and P. R. Larsen
Biochemistry, Cellular and Molecular Biology, and Physiological Roles of the Iodothyronine Selenodeiodinases
Endocr. Rev.,
February 1, 2002;
23(1):
38 - 89.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. L. Leonard, D. M. Leonard, M. Safran, R. Wu, M. L. Zapp, and A. P. Farwell
The Mammalian Homolog of the Frog Type II Selenodeiodinase Does Not Encode a Functional Enzyme in the Rat
Endocrinology,
May 1, 1999;
140(5):
2206 - 2215.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Pallud, A.-M. Lennon, M. Ramauge, J.-M. Gavaret, W. Croteau, M. Pierre, F. Courtin, and D. L. St. Germain
Expression of the Type II Iodothyronine Deiodinase in Cultured Rat Astrocytes Is Selenium-dependent
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 18, 1997;
272(29):
18104 - 18110.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Curcio, M. M. A. Baqui, D. Salvatore, B. H. Rihn, S. Mohr, J. W. Harney, P. R. Larsen, and A. C. Bianco
The Human Type 2 Iodothyronine Deiodinase Is a Selenoprotein Highly Expressed in a Mesothelioma Cell Line
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 3, 2001;
276(32):
30183 - 30187.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. M. Leonard, S. J. Stachelek, M. Safran, A. P. Farwell, T. F. Kowalik, and J. L. Leonard
Cloning, Expression, and Functional Characterization of the Substrate Binding Subunit of Rat Type II Iodothyronine 5'-Deiodinase
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 11, 2000;
275(33):
25194 - 25201.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|