Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 28, Issue of July 12, 1996 pp. 16633-16643
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

An E-box Region within the Prostaglandin Endoperoxide Synthase-2 (PGS-2) Promoter Is Required for Transcription in Rat Ovarian Granulosa Cells*

(Received for publication, February 13, 1996, and in revised form, April 15, 1996)

Jacqueline K. Morris and JoAnne S. Richards Dagger

From the Department of Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

The prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 (PGS-2) gene encodes an isoform of prostaglandin synthase that is transiently induced by protein kinase A (luteinizing hormone/cAMP) and protein kinase C (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) agonists in granulosa cells of ovulating follicles. The promoter of the rat PGS-2 gene contains a CAAT enhancer-binding protein consensus site (CAAT box) which can confer hormone inducibility to a PGS-2·CAT reporter gene, as well as a putative E-box region. To determine if the E-box region was involved in hormone induced trans-activation of the rat PGS-2 gene, constructs with the CAAT box and E-box regions (-192 PGS-2·CAT), only the putative E-box (-110 PGS-2·CAT), or neither region (-52 PGS-2·CAT) were transiently transfected into rat granulosa cell cultures. CAT activity was induced in both the -192 and -110 PGS-2·CAT vectors by luteinizing hormone (10-fold) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (6-fold), whereas CAT activity of the -52 PGS-2·CAT construct did not differ from the promoterless vector (pCAT-Basic). Deletion of 1 base pair from the E-box within the -110 PGS-2·CAT construct, as well as point mutations within the CAAT box, E-box, or both regions of the -192 PGS-2·CAT construct, demonstrated that the E-box is critical for basal transcription, and that regions, in addition to the CAAT box, are involved in hormone induction of the PGS-2 gene. An oligonucleotide spanning the rat PGS-2 E-box bound two specific protein complexes which were supershifted in the presence of antibody specific for the upstream stimulatory factor. Thus, in rat granulosa cells, the PGS-2 E-box region appears to interact with upstream cis-acting elements other than the CAAT box to confer hormonal regulation of the gene. The E-box region of the rat PGS-2 promoter does not contain ATF/CRE activity found in the human and mouse PGS-2 promoters, but is critical for basal transcription of the PGS-2 gene in rat granulosa cells and binds the upstream stimulatory factor (as do E-box regions of other genes regulated in the ovary).


INTRODUCTION

Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase (PGS)1 catalyzes the rate-limiting step of prostaglandin biosynthesis (1). The synthase is a homodimer with two subunits and has two catalytic properties, a cyclooxygenase activity that is required for the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandin G2 and a peroxidase activity that reduces prostaglandin G2 to prostaglandin H2 (1). Prostaglandins are associated with inflammatory responses, wound healing, bone development, glomerular filtration and water balance, and hemostasis (for a review, see Ref. 2). Prostaglandins have also been shown to regulate a variety of reproductive functions, including ovulation (3) and parturition (4). For example, ovulation is inhibited by aspirin, indomethacin, and specific inhibitors of PGS, in mice (5), rats (6, 7, 8), rabbits (9, 10), and pigs (11). Most recently, targeted deletion of the PGS-2 gene has been shown to prevent ovulation in mice (12), whereas targeted disruption of the PGS-1 gene did not alter ovarian function, but did compromise parturition (13).

Two isoforms of the PGS enzyme are present in the rat ovary (14, 15). Each enzyme is the product of a distinct gene as evidenced by the cloning of cDNAs for PGS-1 (16, 17, 18) and PGS-2 (19, 20, 21). PGS-1 is encoded by a 2.8-kilobase pair RNA transcript and the enzyme is ubiquitously expressed in theca cells of the ovarian follicle (15), as well as other tissues (22). PGS-2 is encoded by a 4.4-kilobase pair RNA transcript and is rapidly induced in ovarian granulosa cells by luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), forskolin, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), and epidermal growth factor (14, 15, 23). The presence of PGS-2 mRNA in granulosa cells corresponds to the specific immunological localization of this protein in granulosa cells, not theca cells (14, 15, 24). PGS-2 mRNA is rapidly and transiently induced in the ovary (25) and other tissues by activators of several signaling pathways including protein kinase A, protein kinase C, and tyrosine kinase pathways (22, 23, 26, 27).

The 5'-flanking region of the mouse (28, 29), chicken (30), rat (31), and human (32) PGS-2 genes have been isolated, sequenced, and shown to contain numerous regions of homology (Fig. 1), including putative binding sites for these transcription factors: NFkappa B, Sp1, AP-2, CAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), cAMP response element binding protein (CREB), and E-box binding proteins. Deletion analyses of the promoters have identified regions of functional trans-activation between -195/32 for the rat (31), between -140/-132 and -124/-52 for the human (33, 34), and between -512/-385, -186/-131 and -80/32 for the mouse (35, 36, 37).


Fig. 1. Comparison of the -198/32 region of the rat, mouse, and human PGS-2 5'-flanking sequences. The E-box region is underlined (31, 33, 36).

The functional region of the mouse PGS-2 promoter contains NFkappa B, C/EBP, and an overlapping ATF/CRE (5'-CGTCA-3') and E-box (5'-CACGTG-3') transcription factor recognition sequences (35, 36, 37). Mutational analysis of the NFkappa B and C/EBP elements demonstrated that both these sites were important for tumor necrosis factor-alpha induction of PGS-2·luciferase constructs transfected into MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells (35). Mutational analysis of the ATF/CRE element within the mouse promoter demonstrated that the ATF/CRE element, but not the E-box element, is essential for v-src induction of PGS-2·luciferase constructs transfected into NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells (36). Although the E-box was not required for v-src activation of the PGS-2 expression vectors (36), mutations of the E-box reduced basal levels of transcription (36). Electrophoretic mobility shift assays demonstrated that an end-labeled mouse PGS-2 oligonucleotide (-65/-39 bp), containing ATF/CRE and E-box elements, bound several fibroblast extract proteins which by competition assays and antibody analyses were identified as CREB, c-Jun, and two E-box-binding proteins (36, 37). Furthermore, c-Jun, and not CREB, was shown to be required for v-src induction of PGS-2 promoter constructs in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (37).

When human PGS-2 promoter reporter vectors were transfected into bovine arterial endothelial cells (33) or human U937 monocytic cells (34), various regions (NFkappa B, CAAT box (C/EBP), and ATF/CRE) were shown to be important for the expression of transgenes dependent upon the cell type. Although deletion to -52 disrupted the putative human PGS-2 E-box and abolished functional activity of the human PGS-2 transgenes, specific functional analysis of this element in the context of other regions has not yet been reported. In addition, the human PGS-2 E-box element is different by one base pair from the E-box element present in the rat and mouse PGS-2 promoters (see Table I). Therefore, the human E-box element might bind different E-box binding proteins, than those which bind the rat or mouse PGS-2 E-box element.

Table I.

Sequences of the oligonucleotides utilized in the electrophoretic mobility shift assays


Promoter E-box Oligonucleotide Reference

Rat PGS-2 5'-agg CAG TCA CGA AGT CAC GTG GAG TCC ACT 31
GTC AGT GCT TCA CTC AGG TGA gga
Mouse PGS-2 5'-agg TCA CCA CTA CGT CAC GTG GAG TCG GCT 36
AGT GGT GAT GCA CTC AGG CGA gga
Human PGS-2 5'-agg TCA TTT CGT CAC ATG GGC TTG GTT 33
AGT AAA GCA CCG AAC CAA gga
SF-1 5'-agg TG CAG AGT CAC GTG GGG GCA GAG 52
A C GTC TCA CCC CGT CTC gga
Mouse RIIbeta 5'-AG CTT GGG GAT CAC GTG GG 51
A CCC CTA CCG CGC
Rat FSH-R 5'-agg G GTG GGT CAC GTG ACT TTG C 53
C CAC CCA TGA AAC G gga

In the 5'-flanking region of the rat PGS-2 gene, a CAAT box region (-140/-132) has been identified and shown to confer cAMP-responsiveness when ligated to a minimal -52/32 PGS-2·CAT reporter construct (38). Mutation of this CAAT box region decreased cAMP inducibility of the fusion construct in rat ovarian granulosa cells by 50%. The CAAT box binds to C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta proteins present in nuclear extracts of rat granulosa cells (38). Furthermore, LH induces C/EBPbeta mRNA and decreases C/EBPalpha mRNA coordinately with the induction of the PGS-2 gene (38). However, because the PGS-2·CAT fusion vectors used in these experiments disrupted what has recently been characterized as a CRE/ATF and E-box regulatory region in the mouse promoter, additional analyses were required to determine the specific role of each region for trans-activation of the rat PGS-2 promoter in ovarian granulosa cells (38).

Based on the evidence that multiple factors bind the ATF/CRE, E-box and CAAT elements of the PGS-2 gene, and that these regions confer trans-activation in an agonist, cell-type, or species promoter-specific manner, we have designed experiments to determine if the ATF/CRE or E-box region of the rat PGS-2 promoter might also be functionally relevant for trans-activation of the rat PGS-2 gene by LH and GnRH in granulosa cells. Transient transfection of reporter constructs in rat granulosa cells demonstrated that the E-box element is critical for basal activation of the PGS-2 gene in granulosa cells and that one transcription factor which binds to this region is an upstream stimulatory factor (USF). In addition, when specific mutants within the CAAT box and E-box regions were made in context of the intact promoter and ligated to a pCAT·Basic reporter construct, the consensus C/EBP site was not essential for activation of PGS-2 reporter constructs by either LH or GnRH, suggesting that the E-box region interacts with other cis-acting elements in the proximal (-110/-52) region of the rat PGS-2 promoter.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Animals

Immature female rats (day 23 of age; weight, 55-60 g) were injected with 17beta -estradiol (1.5 mg/day for 3 days) beginning on day 24 of age (25, 39, 40). Hypophysectomized immature female rats (day 26 of age) were obtained from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN) 1 day after surgery. Animals were primed with 17beta -estradiol (E; 1.5 mg/day subcutaneously for 3 days) and FSH (F; 1.0 µg subcutaneously, twice daily for 2 days) designated HE or HEF, respectively (23). Animals were treated in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All protocols had the approval of the Institutional Committee on Animal Care and Use, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

Granulosa Cell Culture

Ovaries from immature rats primed with 17beta -estradiol were punctured with a 22-gauge needle to isolate granulosa cells. The granulosa cells were pooled, treated with trypsin (20 µg/ml) for 1 min, followed by addition of soybean trypsin inhibitor (300 µg/ml) and DNase I (160 µg/ml) to remove necrotic cells, as described previously (39). Cells were washed twice and then cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium:F12 supplemented with ovine FSH (50 ng/ml) and testosterone (10 ng/ml) at 37 °C in 95% air and 5% CO2. After 48 h, granulosa cells cultured under these conditions acquire a preovulatory phenotype (39, 40) and respond to ovulatory doses of either FSH or LH as indicated by the induction of specific enzymes, including PGS-2 (15, 25), and the progesterone receptor (41) within 5-7 h.

Transient Transfection Assay

Plasmid DNA was purified from bacteria by alkaline lysis and centrifugation on CsCl gradients (42). The differentiated granulosa cells were transfected with 12.5 µg/well of plasmid DNA as described previously (43). Briefly, the plasmid DNA was precipitated by dropwise addition of a 250 mM CaCl and plasmid DNA mixture in an equal volume of 2 × HEPES-buffered saline (280 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM Na2HPO4, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.2) and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. After the addition of fresh Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium:F12 to the differentiated granulosa cells, 300 µl of the DNA precipitate were added dropwise to each well. For transfection, the cells were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C in 95% air and 5% CO2, washed once with Hanks' buffered medium without calcium or magnesium, and treated with either no hormone, LH (500 ng/ml), or GnRH (1 µM). After 6 h, the granulosa cells were washed with 2 ml of ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), harvested by gentle scraping with a rubber policeman in 1 ml of TEN (10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 0.1 M NaCl), and centrifuged (12,000 × g, 4 °C) to obtain a cell pellet. The cell pellet was resuspended in 100 µl of 0.25 M Tris-HCl, frozen on dry ice-ethanol, thawed, followed by two additional freeze/thaw cycles, and finally clarified by centrifugation at 4 °C at 12,000 × g. CAT activity in the lysates (25 µg of protein) was measured in the presence of 25 mM acetyl-coenzyme A and 2 µl per reaction of [14C]chloramphenicol as described previously (44).

Whole Cell and Nuclear Extracts

Whole cell extracts were prepared from R2C cells as described previously (45). Nuclear extracts of granulosa cells isolated from hormonally primed rats were prepared as described previously (31, 46), designated HE and HEF. Nuclear extracts were also prepared from granulosa cells isolated from HEF rats 2 h after an intravenous injection of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, 10 IU) designated HEF + hCG (2 h).

Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay

Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were performed as described elsewhere (31, 47). Briefly, nuclear extracts (1 µg of protein/reaction) or whole cell extracts (10 µg/reaction) were incubated with 5 fmol (20,000-30,000 cpm) of end-labeled oligonucleotides containing E-box sites: rat PGS-2 -67/-41, mouse PGS-2 -65/-39, human PGS-2, rat steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1), mouse type II regulatory subunit of protein kinase A (RIIbeta ), or rat follicle stimulating hormone-receptor (FSH-R; see Table I), and 5.5 µg of poly(dI-dC) in a final volume of 20 µl in buffer containing 50 mM KCl, 15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, and 12% glycerol. When antibodies were used, the nuclear extracts were preincubated for 15 min with the antiserum prior to the addition of other reagents. The binding reactions were resolved by electrophoresis using a 5% acrylamide gel and 0.5 × TBE (45 mM Tris borate, 1 mM EDTA) as the gel and electrophoresis buffer.

Immunoblot Analyses

Proteins of whole cell lysates from granulosa cell cultures were resolved by one-dimensional SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (4.5% stacking gel and 10% separating gel) at 60 mA/gel for 1 h. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose filters (0.45 µM) overnight at 30 V and blocked in 5% milk, PBS (80 mM disodium hydrogen orthophosphate anhydrous, 20 mM sodium dihydrogen orthophosphate, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) with 0.1% Tween-20 (PBS-T) for 1 h, washed in PBS-T for 5 min (three times). The nitrocellulose filter was incubated in a 1:5000 dilution of USF antibody (from Dr. M. Sawadogo, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) in PBS-T, 5% milk for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane was washed once for 15 min and three times for 5 min in PBS-T, then incubated in anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:10,000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. The filter was washed once for 15 min and three times for 5 min. The immunopositive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL), as described by Amersham Corp.

Cloning

The rat -110 PGS-2·CAT fusion construct was created by ligating a double-stranded -110/-53 oligonucleotide (5'-AGC TGG GGG GGT GGG GGG GTG GGG AAA GCC GAG GCG GAA AGA CAC AGT CAC GAA GTC AC-3') to the -52/32 PGS-2·CAT construct (38). The latter was produced by digesting a -628/32 PGS-2·CAT construct with HindIII and BbrI. The -110 mutant (Mt) PGS-2·CAT fusion construct was created as above using a -110/-54 oligonucleotide (5'-AGC TGG GGG GGT GGG GGG GTG GGG AAA GCC GAG GCG GAA AGA CAC AGT CAC GAA GTC A-3'). This created a 1-base pair deletion within the putative E-box element (CACGTG to CA_GTG).

Three additional mutations of the PGS-2 promoter were created using the -195/32 PGS-2·CAT construct as a template, -195/32 (C/EBP Mt) PGS-2·CAT, -195/32 (E-box Mt) PGS-2·CAT and a -195/32 (Double Mt) PGS-2·CAT. The C/EBP Mt was created by substituting four base pairs within the CAAT box that disrupts the binding of C/EBPalpha and beta  protein. In EMSA, the C/EBP mutant oligonucleotide did not compete for the binding of C/EBPs to a labeled -195/-110 DNA fragment (25). The E-box mutant was created with an oligonucleotide containing a two base pair substitution which also fails to compete for the binding of proteins to a labeled wild type -64/-41 oligonucleotide (see Fig. 3A, lane 7). Finally, the Double Mt includes these same mutations within both the CAAT box and the E-box.


Fig. 3. Granulosa cell nuclear extracts prepared from granulosa cells at various stages of differentiation form specific protein-DNA complexes with the rat PGS-2 E-box oligonucleotide. A, granulosa cells of preovulatory follicles were obtained from 17beta -estradiol and FSH primed hypophysectomized (HEF) rats. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed with 32P-labeled rPGS-2 (-67/-41) oligonucleotide (lane 1) using nuclear extracts (1 µg of protein) of HEF granulosa cells collected 2 h after an injection of an ovulatory dose of hCG (HEF + hCG (2 h); lanes 2-7). An increasing molar (10-, 20-, and 50-fold) excess of the self-competitor DNA (lanes 3 and 4), the -110/-54 oligonucleotide or a mutated E-box element (CACGTG to CACtTt; lane 7) oligonucleotide were used as competitor DNA (100-fold molar excess) to demonstrate the specificity of protein binding to the E-box oligonucleotide. Specific protein-DNA complexes are indicated by the arrows labeled I and II. B, nuclear extracts were prepared from granulosa cells of different developmental stages. The 32P-labeled rat PGS-2 (-67/-41) oligonucleotide was incubated with nuclear extracts (1 µg) of small antral (HE; lane 2), preovulatory (HEF; lane 3), and ovulatory follicles (HEF + hCG (2 h); lane 4) or with whole cell extracts (10 µg) collected from R2C Leydig cells, a rat Leydig cell line (lane 5). As demonstrated, complexes I and II (arrows) were present during all stages of follicular development and in the R2C Leydig cell lysates.

The mutations (indicated by lowercase) within the -195 to 32 base pairs of the PGS-2 promoter were created by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using mutant oligonucleotides to the CAAT box (5'-GGT ATT ATt Ccc aTG GAA GC-3' and 5'-GCT TCC Atg gGa ATA ATA CC-3') and the E-box (5'-AGT CAC GAA GTC ACt TtG AGT CCA-3' and 5'-AAG TGG ACT CaA aGT GAC TTC GT-3'), external primers that would hybridize at each end of the promoter region to be cloned (5'-GCC AAG CTT CCT GGC TTC TC-3' and 5'-TGC TCT AGA GCT ACT CCT GAA GCT CTC CGC TC-3'), and -195/32 PGS-2·CAT fusion construct as a template for the E-box and C/EBP mutant oligonucleotides. The -195/32 (Double Mt) PGS-2·CAT was generated with the same external oligonucleotides, the E-box mutant oligonucleotides and the -195/32 (C/EBP Mt) PGS-2·CAT construct as the template. The cloning procedure was as described in PCR protocols (48). The first round of PCR consisted of 30 cycles at 72 °C (1 min), 42 °C (1 min), and 95 °C (1 min). The PCR products were then separated and purified from a 2% agarose gel utilizing NA45 paper (Schleicher & Schuell) and eluted as described previously (49). The second round of PCR utilized 15 cycles of 72 °C (1 min), 42 °C (1 min), and 95 °C (1 min), followed by an additional 15 cycles with an annealing temperature of 50 C. The PCR products were isolated as above, digested with HindIII and XbaI, and ligated into the HindIII and XbaI sites of a digested pCAT·Basic vector. All plasmids were sequenced on an automated sequencer according to Taq DyeDeoxy Terminator cycle sequencing for verification of the mutations (University of Texas-Houston, Core Facility).


RESULTS

An E-box cis-Acting DNA Element Is Required for Transcriptional Activation of rPGS-2 Promoter in Rat Ovarian Granulosa Cells

Previous functional analyses of rat PGS-2·CAT promoter expression vectors in primary ovarian granulosa cells demonstrated that -195 base pairs of the proximal promoter were sufficient to confer LH, FSH, and forskolin inducibility to the PGS-2·CAT vectors (38). A CAAT box element within this region (-195/-110) was shown to bind C/EBP proteins, specifically C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta , and to confer cAMP (FSH, LH, and forskolin) inducibility if ligated to a minimally active -52/32 PGS-2·CAT construct (38). Transfection of the (-192/-110)(-52/32) PGS-2·CAT fusion construct exhibited a decrease in basal transcription (38). Based on recent reports, this construct disrupted the ATF/CRE and/or E-box region (-67/-39) (33, 36).

To determine the functional activity of the -110/-53 region of the rat PGS-2 promoter, we have made additional constructs by ligating a -110/-53 oligonucleotide onto the -52 PGS-2·CAT fusion construct. A mutant construct (-110 mt PGS-2·CAT) with a 1-base pair deletion within the E-box region (CACGTG to CA_GTG) was also created. The -195, -110, -110 Mt, and -52 PGS-2·CAT constructs were transiently transfected into differentiated granulosa cells and exposed to LH (Fig. 2A). All values were measured within the linear range of the assay and then adjusted to the relative CAT activity for 25 µg of protein extract. The vector pCAT·Control (Promega, Madison, WI), which contains the simian virus 40 promoter and enhancer, was utilized in each transfection experiment as a control for transfection efficiency. The pCAT·Control vector routinely displayed a relative CAT activity of 80 ± 10 indicating that transfection efficiency was reproducible among all experiments. The -195 PGS-2·CAT vector exhibited significantly higher relative basal activity than pCAT·Basic, which lacks a promoter. This was reduced 33% with the -110 PGS-2·CAT construct, which lacks the CAAT box element (-142/-139). Basal activity decreased an additional 40% by mutation of the E-box. The relative CAT activity stimulated by LH was 88.7 ± 18 and 30 ± 10 relative activity for the -195 and -110 PGS-2·CAT constructs, respectively. However, the relative CAT activity of the -110 Mt vector induced by LH, was not different from the -52 PGS-2·CAT construct, 5.5 ± 3 and 3.6 ± 0.2, respectively. Thus, by disrupting the E-box region, basal, as well as LH-induced, trans-activation of the -110 PGS-2·CAT reporter construct was reduced in differentiated granulosa cell cultures. Collectively, these data indicate that the E-box region is a functional cis-acting DNA element within the rat PGS-2 promoter that is essential for transcriptional activation of the PGS-2 gene in granulosa cells.


Fig. 2. Transcriptional activation of rPGS-2 promoter·CAT constructs in ovarian granulosa cell cultures requires an E-box cis-acting DNA element. A, deletion or mutational constructs of the PGS-2 promoter ligated to pCAT-Basic expression vector are shown schematically (left panel). Two important functional domains present in the PGS-2 promoter (CCAAT box and E-box) are identified. After transfection of the -195, -110, -110 Mt, and -52 PGS-2·CAT constructs into differentiated granulosa cells, the cells (see ``Experimental Procedures'') were treated without (gray bars) or with LH (500 ng/ml; black bars) for 6 h. The relative activity of PGS-2·CAT vectors are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments. Relative activity was determined and normalized for all samples as the percent conversion for 25 µg of protein. Fold induction by LH for pCAT·Basic, -195, -110, -110 Mt, and the -52 PGS-2·CAT constructs was 1.75-, 8.2-, 10-, 4-, and 4-fold, respectively. B, the same constructs (shown schematically; left panel) were transiently transfected into differentiated granulosa cells and treated without (gray bars) or with GnRH (1 µM; hatched bars). Relative CAT activity was calculated as in panel A for three independent experiments. Fold induction by GnRH for the pCAT·Basic, -195, -110, -110 Mt, and the -52 PGS-2·CAT constructs was 1-, 3-, 6-, 2.4-, and 1.8-fold, respectively.

Previous studies have demonstrated that two distinct signaling pathways induce PGS-2 mRNA and protein in preovulatory granulosa cells (23, 26, 27). One pathway involves LH activation of protein kinase A; the other involves GnRH activation of protein kinase C (27). In order to determine if the regions of the rat PGS-2 promoter, that are activated by LH, are also activated by GnRH, the -195, -110, -110 Mt, and -52 PGS·CAT constructs were transiently transfected into differentiated granulosa cells and exposed to GnRH (1 µM; Fig. 2B). The relative basal level of CAT activity measured in granulosa cells transfected with pCAT·Basic was minimal and was not altered by addition of GnRH to the cultures. Addition of GnRH increased CAT activity produced by the -195 PGS-2 construct 3-fold, a level of CAT activity approximately one-third of that induced by LH. Relative CAT activity of the -110 PGS-2·CAT construct induced by GnRH did not significantly decrease compared to the -195 PGS-2 CAT construct, while the fold induction of -110 PGS-2·CAT by GnRH increased from 3- to 6-fold due to a decrease in the basal activity of the -110 PGS-2·CAT construct. Disruption of the E-box cis-element within constructs, -110 Mt and -52 PGS-2·CAT, decreased GnRH induction 50%, when compared to the nonmutated -110 PGS-2·CAT promoter construct. These data support the obligatory role of the E-box element for trans-activation of the PGS-2 gene by these two distinct signaling pathways in granulosa cells.

Binding of Protein Complexes to the E-box Is Not Determined by the Stage of Follicular Development

As mentioned above, the mouse PGS-2 promoter contains an ATF/CRE and E-box region that is activated in NIH 3T3 cells by cotransfection with a v-src expression plasmid (36). Mutation of these elements within the promoter demonstrated that the ATF/CRE element, but not the E-box, is important for v-src trans-activation of the mouse PGS-2 promoter in NIH 3T3 cells (36). Although the E-box cis-element did not appear to be involved in the v-src induction of the PGS-2 gene in NIH 3T3 cells, a decrease in basal transcription was seen when the E-box element was mutated (36).

To determine if similar, or the same proteins, might bind to the E-box region (-67/-41) of the rat PGS-2 promoter, nuclear extracts were prepared from preovulatory granulosa cells induced with an ovulatory dose of hCG for 2 h; a treatment known to induce expression of the endogenous PGS-2 gene (25). When nuclear extract protein (1 µg) was incubated with an end-labeled -67/-41 oligonucleotide containing the rat PGS-2 promoter E-box element, two protein-DNA complexes were formed (designated I and II; Fig. 3A). The binding reaction was specific as demonstrated by the ability of 10-, 50-, and 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled -67/-41 oligonucleotide to inhibit complex formation (Fig. 3A, lanes 3-5). Additionally, 100-fold excess of an oligonucleotide 5' of the E-box region (-110/-54) was unable to block the formation of the two protein-DNA complexes (Fig. 3A, lane 6). The oligonucleotide mutated within the E-box region (-67/-41 Mt; CACGTG to CACtTt) also did not prevent complex formation (Fig. 3A, lane 7). These results indicated that granulosa cell nuclei contained protein(s) capable of binding specifically to an E-box element.

To determine if the E-box binding protein(s) present in the nuclear extract of granulosa cells was hormonally regulated during follicular development, the end-labeled -67/-41 oligonucleotide was incubated with nuclear extracts prepared from granulosa cells at different stages of follicular development. Nuclear extracts were collected from granulosa cells of preantral/small antral follicles (HE), preovulatory follicles (HEF), and from preovulatory granulosa cells that had received an ovulatory dose of hCG (HEF/hCG) (2 h). Both protein-DNA complexes previously observed were present at all stages of follicular development (Fig. 3B, lanes 2-4). Additionally, similar protein-DNA complexes were formed with whole cell extracts isolated from R2C cells, a rat Leydig cell line (Fig. 3B, lane 5).

Role of the CAAT Box and E-box cis-Elements in trans-Activation of the PGS-2 Gene

When isolated from each other, the C/EBP (38) and E-box cis-elements appear capable of conferring functional activation of the PGS-2 promoter by binding specific factors. Therefore, it was essential to determine the requirement of each site within the context of an intact promoter. The mutations within the promoter were generated to disrupt the DNA elements binding C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta (38), E-box proteins, or both types of transcription factors as discussed under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The three mutant constructs, in addition to the wild type -195 PGS-2·CAT vector, were transiently transfected into differentiated granulosa cells as described previously (Fig. 4A). The relative basal CAT activity in cells transfected with the -195 PGS-2 construct was similar to that obtained for the C/EBP Mt construct (11.5 ± 5 versus 12.3 ± 1.7, respectively). Likewise, the relative CAT activity (91 ± 26 versus 124 ± 47), as well as fold increase (10 ± 3 versus 10 ± 3-fold), induced by LH were similar for the -195 PGS-2·CAT and the C/EBP Mt, respectively. Thus, in the context of the intact promoter, the consensus CAAT box is not required for LH induction of PGS-2 promoter constructs in transient transfection assays of granulosa cells. However, when the E-box Mt was transfected into primary granulosa cell cultures, relative basal CAT activity in the absence of hormone was 15% of the activity produced by the -195 PGS-2·CAT construct. The relative CAT activity induced by LH was 15% of the activity of the nonmutated construct (-195 PGS-2·CAT). Since both basal and induced CAT activity decreased, the fold induction by LH was not affected (Fig. 4A). The Double Mt construct (harboring both the CAAT and E-box mutations) and the E-box Mt exhibited similar basal, as well as LH induced, relative CAT activity. The fold induction of the Double Mt by LH decreased from 9- to 5-fold compared to the -195 PGS-2·CAT (Fig. 4A). These data provide further evidence that the E-box element is an essential DNA cis-element for the trans-activation of PGS-2 gene promoter constructs in differentiated granulosa cells.


Fig. 4. Role of the CAAT box and the E-box DNA binding elements in the trans-activation of the rat PGS-2 gene. A, mutations within the CAAT box and the E-box sites (as indicated by lower case letters) were generated with the polymerase chain reaction and oligonucleotides containing mutations within the CAAT box or E-box (see Fig. 1). Primary cultures of differentiated granulosa cells were transiently transfected with the mutated constructs: C/EBP Mt, E-box Mt, and Double Mt. The cells were then treated without (gray bars) or with LH (500 ng/ml; black bars). After 6 h, cells were harvested, lysed, and the cytosolic fractions were assayed for CAT activity. Data are expressed as relative activity (mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments). Fold induction by LH for the pCAT·Basic, -195, C/EBP Mt, E-box Mt, and the Double Mt PGS-2·CAT vectors was 1.75-, 9-, 9.8-, 8.8-, and 5.1-fold, respectively. B, granulosa cells transfected with the three mutant constructs were also treated without (gray bars) or with (hatched bars) GnRH (1 µM) for 6 h before proteins were collected and CAT activity measured. The data are expressed as relative activity (mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments). Fold induction by GnRH for the pCAT·Basic, -195, C/EBP Mt, E-box Mt, and the Double Mt PGS-2·CAT constructs was 1-, 3.3-, 4-, 3.1-, and 2-fold, respectively.

Relative CAT activities induced by GnRH in cells transfected with the -195 PGS-2·CAT construct versus the C/EBP Mt were similar (40 ± 16 versus 50 ± 10; Fig. 4B). However, transfection of the E-box Mt decreased relative CAT activity induced by GnRH to 15% of the activity produced by the nonmutated construct (-195 PGS-2·CAT). The fold induction by GnRH remained unchanged for all three constructs. CAT activity in the presence or absence of GnRH in the Double Mt was similar and not different from that of the E-box Mt (Fig. 4B). These data further demonstrate that the E-box is required for basal activity, as well as hormone induction, of PGS-2 transgenes in granulosa cell cultures.

CREB Does Not Bind the -67/-41 Region of the Rat PGS-2 Promoter

The mouse PGS-2 promoter -65/-39 bp oligonucleotide binds both CREB (36), c-Jun (37), and E-box proteins (36) in electrophoretic mobility shift assays. This same region is essential for v-src induction of PGS-2 chimeric genes in NIH 3T3 cells (37). To determine whether the protein-DNA complexes shifted by the rat -67/-41 oligonucleotide contained CREB, or other CRE-binding proteins, nuclear extracts of granulosa cells were incubated with an end-labeled rat -67/-41 oligonucleotide (Fig. 5A) in the presence or absence of unlabeled consensus CRE oligonucleotide or CREB antibody. The two complexes binding the rat E-box element were not competed by 100-fold excess of CRE; nor were they supershifted with the CREB antibody (Fig. 5B). To directly compare the proteins binding to the mouse and rat CRE/E-box promoter regions, an oligonucleotide corresponding to the mouse CRE/E-box (-65/-39; Fig. 5A) was labeled and incubated with granulosa cell nuclear extracts. Protein-DNA complexes in addition to complex I and II were observed and are denoted as complexes III and IV (Fig. 5C). When an unlabeled CRE consensus oligonucleotide was incubated with the nuclear extracts and the mouse oligonucleotide, complexes III and IV, but not I and II, were decreased (Fig. 5, B and C). The ability of the CREB antibody to shift CREB protein present in the mouse complex IV (Fig. 5C (*)) confirmed the ability of CREB to bind mouse E-box oligonucleotide. CREB was not present in rat or mouse complexes I and II (Fig. 5, B and C). By these in vitro DNA binding assays, it is clear that more proteins bind to this region of the mouse PGS-2 promoter than to the rat promoter, and that one of the proteins is CREB.


Fig. 5. CREB does not bind the -67/-41 region of the rat PGS-2 promoter. A, rat and mouse PGS-2 promoter regions containing the E-box DNA element. The E-box is indicated by the boxed in area; the ATF/CRE region is underlined. B, the rat PGS-2 oligonucleotide was incubated with nuclear extracts (HEF + hCG) (2 h) in the absence or presence of either a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled CRE consensus oligonucleotide (Promega) or with a 1:20 dilution of antibody to CREB. Neither the CRE nor CREB antibody altered the formation of the protein-DNA complexes I and II (arrows). C, when the mouse PGS-2 oligonucleotide was incubated with the same nuclear extract, complexes I and II as well as complexes III and IV were formed. Complexes III and IV, but not I and II, were decreased in the presence of the unlabled CRE. Complex IV was supershifted (*) in the presence of CREB antibody (1:20). Thus, CREB and other protein CRE-binding proteins interact with the mouse, and not the rat, PGS-2 promoter.

USF Binds to the E-box Region of the PGS-2 Promoter

Several class B E-box binding proteins have been identified and shown to bind the CACGTG consensus site (50). These include USF which binds to this region when a thymidine (T) residue precedes the consensus region (TCACGTG) (50). To determine if USF was present in the E-box DNA-protein complexes, USF antibody was added to the binding reactions at increasing concentrations (dilutions of 1:2000, 1:200, and 1:20). Each dilution of the antiserum generated a supershifted complex, which was not observed in the presence of preimmune serum (Fig. 6A). The increasing amount of antibody in the binding reaction reduced the amount of protein/DNA present in both complex I and II suggesting that both protein-DNA complexes contain the transcription factor USF.


Fig. 6. The transcription factor, USF, binds to the E-box region of the rat PGS-2 promoter. A, EMSAs with a 32P-labeled rat PGS-2 -67/-41 oligonucleotide formed two protein-DNA complexes I and II in the presence of nuclear extract (HEF + hCG (2 h); lane 2), but not in the absence of nuclear extracts (lane 1). When reactions included a 1:20 dilution of preimmune serum (lane 3), complexes I or II remained unchanged; incubation with increasing amounts of polyclonal antibody to the transcription factor, USF (1:2000, 1:200, and 1:20) supershifted (*) both complexes I and II (lanes 4-6). Thus, USF protein is present in both protein complexes (I and II) that bind the -67/-41 oligonucleotide. B, differentiated granulosa cell extracts were exposed to an ovulatory dose of hCG (500 ng/ml). After 0, 2, 7, 12, or 24 h, the cells were lysed and whole cell extracts were prepared. The whole cell lysates (50 µg) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose. The membranes were incubated with USF antibody at 1:5000 dilution in 2% milk, 1 × PBS. The blots were then incubated with anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horse radish peroxidase (1:10,000) and visualized with ECL. The USF protein (43/44 kDa; arrow) is expressed in differentiated granulosa cells throughout a 24-h incubation with hCG.

This study has demonstrated that USF protein binds to the E-box in the rat PGS-2 promoter (Fig. 6A) and that this binding does not vary during follicular development (Fig. 3B). To determine if the USF protein is induced by LH in association with induction of the PGS-2 gene, differentiated granulosa cells were induced with hCG (500 ng/ml) for 2, 7, 12, and 24 h. Whole cell protein extracts collected prior to incubation with hCG (500 ng/ml) and after each time point were analyzed by immunoblot analysis. The amount of USF protein present in whole cell extracts of granulosa cells did not change after incubation with hCG (Fig. 6B). The doublet present on the immunoblot suggests that both the 43- and 44-kDa isoforms of USF are present in the granulosa cell lysates.

Promoters of Several Ovarian Genes Contain an E-box DNA cis-Element

Other genes which are involved in ovarian function contain a similar E-box consensus site in their 5'-flanking regions (Table I). The promoter of the RIIbeta gene (regulatory subunit of protein kinase A) contains an E-box that binds both USF and c-myc present in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) fibroblasts and mouse Nb2a neuroblastoma cell extracts (51). The gene encoding Ad4bp (adrenal 4 binding protein), also known as SF-1, requires an E-box for transcriptional activation of fusion constructs transfected into Y-1 adrenocortical cells and MA-10 testicular Leydig cells (52). Finally, the promoter of the FSH-receptor gene also has a consensus E-box (53) that is important for regulation of the FSH-receptor promoter fusion constructs in rat Sertoli cells (54).

To determine if the E-box elements present in the promoters bound similar proteins as the rat PGS-2 E-box, oligonucleotides corresponding to E-boxes of the human and rat PGS-2, as well as rat SF-1, rat FSH-R, and mouse RIIbeta genes were synthesized, end-labeled and incubated with granulosa cell nuclear extracts. The labeled rat PGS-2 E-box oligonucleotide (-67/-41) formed two protein-DNA complexes (I and II) in the presence of nuclear extract as previously discussed (Fig. 7, panel A, lane 1). Complexes I and II were decreased in the presence of unlabeled competitor DNA corresponding to the rat PGS-2, RIIbeta , and FSH-receptor E-box regions, but not to a CRE oligonucleotide (Fig. 7, panel A, lanes 2-5). In addition, both complexes were shifted in the presence of USF antibody (1:2000; Fig. 7, panel A, lane 6).


Fig. 7. Promoters of several genes expressed in the ovary contain E-box elements that bind USF. Oligonucleotides containing E-box elements of several promoters were synthesized: A, rat PGS-2; B, human PGS-2; C, SF-1, D, RIIbeta ; and E, FSH receptor. The ability of each of these promoter sequences to bind proteins present in granulosa cell nuclear extracts was compared by EMSAs using labeled oligonucleotides as indicated in the presence of unlabeled competitor DNA (100-fold) or USF-antibody (1:2000) as indicated. See text for discussion.

The labeled human PGS-2 oligonucleotide formed several protein-DNA complexes when incubated with rat granulosa cell nuclear extract (Fig. 7, panel B, lane 7). These complexes were specifically competed by competitor human PGS-2 E-box DNA, but not with either rPGS-2 or RIIbeta E-box competitor DNA (Fig. 7, panel B, lanes 8-10). Consensus CRE competitor DNA prevented formation of all, but two protein-DNA complexes (Fig. 7, panel B, lane 11). None of the complexes was shifted in the presence of the USF antibody (Fig. 7, panel B, lane 12).

Labeled SF-1 E-box oligonucleotide formed two protein-DNA complexes which were decreased in the presence of SF-1 and rPGS-2 E-box competitor DNA (Fig. 7, panel C, lanes 1-4). These protein-DNA complexes were shifted in the presence of the USF antibody (Fig. 7, panel C, lane 5).

Labeled mouse RIIbeta oligonucleotide formed two complexes similar to complexes I and II of the rPGS-2 E-box oligonucleotide (Fig. 7, panel D, lane 1). These complexes were decreased in the presence of RIIbeta , FSH-R, and rPGS-2 competitor DNA, but not in the presence of a CRE oligonucleotide (Fig. 7, panel D, lanes 2-5). The complexes were shifted in the presence of a USF antibody (Fig. 7, panel D, lane 6). An additional protein-DNA complex is also present, but is not specifically competed by the unlabeled competitor DNA (Fig. 7, panel D, lanes 2-4).

Labeled FSH-receptor DNA formed two complexes similar to complexes I and II formed by the rat PGS-2, as well as the SF-1, E-box oligonucleotides (Fig. 7, panel E, lane 7). Formation of these complexes was prevented by competitor FSH-R, RIIbeta , and rPGS-2 E-box DNA, but not the consensus CRE oligonucleotide (Fig. 7, panel E, lanes 8-11). In addition, both complex I and II were shifted in the presence of the USF antibody (Fig. 7, panel E, lane 12).

In summary, promoters for rat PGS-2, mouse PGS-2, RIIbeta , FSH-R, and SF-1, but not human PGS-2 promoters, contain an E-box region capable of binding the USF protein present in granulosa cell nuclear extracts. The mouse PGS-2 and human PGS-2 promoters also contain a consensus CRE adjacent to the E-box, which binds the CREB protein (33, 36).


DISCUSSION

The specific molecular events controlling the expression of the PGS-2 gene in the ovary are dependent not only on the activation of specific signaling pathways, but also on the stage of follicular development and granulosa cell differentiation (55). Induction of PGS-2 mRNA and protein by protein kinase A (LH) and protein kinase C (GnRH) pathways occurs only in granulosa cells that have differentiated to a preovulatory phenotype (14, 24, 25, 26). This study documents that transcriptional regulation by LH and GnRH of rat PGS-2 promoter transgenes in rat ovarian granulosa cells is dependent on the integrity of a cis-acting E-box element located in the proximal promoter. Disruption of this E-box by a 5' deletion to -52 bp, a point mutation that deletes the C nucleotide at position -52, or mutation of the consensus E-box sequence from CACGTG to CACtTt within the context of the -192 bp of the promoter caused marked decreases in the transcriptional activity of chimeric genes transfected into cultured rat granulosa cells. Mutations of a functional C/EBP consensus binding site (-140/-132) (38) within the context of the promoter did not abolish basal or hormonal regulation of the transgenes, indicating that the E-box region interacts with other cis-acting DNA elements located proximal to the CAAT box. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays documented that the transcription factor USF is present in granulosa cell nuclear extracts and binds to an E-box region of the rat PGS-2 promoter. No additional protein-DNA complexes were observed within this region indicating that USF is the primary transcription factor in granulosa cells that binds the E-box region of the rat PGS-2 promoter.

By comparing the binding activities of the rat, mouse, and human PGS-2 E-box regions using rat granulosa cell nuclear extracts, we have shown that the rat E-box region forms two complexes both of which contain USF. The E-box region of the mouse PGS-2 gene also binds USF, but in addition binds CREB and c-Jun (36, 37). Despite the ability of the mouse PGS-2 promoter to bind each of these factors, c-Jun is the transcription factor in NIH-3T3 cells that is able to mediate v-src trans-activation of mouse PGS-2 transgenes in the absence of a functional E-box (37). A deletion mutant of the human PGS-2 promoter (-52/59) that disrupts the putative human E-box region also abolishes functional activity of chimeric transgenes genes. However, it is not yet known if the human PGS-2 E-box has functional importance for activity in any of the cell types tested or in conjunction with other regions (NF-kappa B, C/EBP, CRE) reported to confer functional activity (33, 34). In addition, it is not yet known which (if any) E-box proteins bind the putative E-box region of the human PGS-2 promoter. Although the human E-box (CACTG) differs from the rat and mouse (CACTG) and does not bind USF, this sequence has been shown to bind other E-box proteins (50).

Although differences in PGS-2 promoter sequences between species may determine tissue-specific expression of the gene, the observed differences in the PGS-2 E-box regions of rat, mouse, and human do not appear to have major effects on the induction of PGS-2 in granulosa cells of preovulatory follicles. PGS-2 is induced by LH in rat (14, 24, 25), mouse (data not shown), bovine (56), and presumably human preovulatory granulosa cells. Furthermore, a mouse PGS-2 luciferase construct containing -371 bp of promoter sequence (36) is activated by LH when transfected into cultured rat granulosa cells (data not shown). Thus, the PGS-2 E-box of each species is likely to be functionally important in granulosa cells with the CRE/ATF binding sites providing additional regulation of activity in the mouse and human genes. Because the PGS-2 gene is usually repressed except in specific cell types and some transformed cell lines, there must also be factors that silence the promoter either by effecting the binding of USF or other regulatory factors.

Although USF was the only protein in granulosa cell extracts that bound to the rat PGS-2 E-box region in detectable amounts, it is unlikely to be the sole factor controlling PGS-2 expression in granulosa cells in response to agonist induction. USF protein levels and DNA binding activities were similar in small antral, preovulatory, and ovulatory granulosa cells exposed to hCG. This is not surprising since USF is ubiquitously expressed in all tissues (57). Therefore, changes in USF activity might be regulated by phosphorylation or by the interaction of USF with other components of the transcriptional machinery that are regulated or modified by the actions of LH and GnRH. Because no consensus phosphorylation sites have been found in the domains of the USF protein required for activation of transcription and because the putative USF protein activation domains are themselves not acidic activation domains, the mechanism of trans-activation by USF remains unclear (58). It appears likely that additional cis-acting factors and unknown co-activators may be involved in the hormonal regulation of the PGS-2 promoter in the rat ovary. Co-activators of USF have been identified in other tissues (59) and in the regulation of viral genes (60), however, the putative co-activator(s) of USF in ovarian cells remain to be determined.

The regulatory role of E-box regions is intriguing because several other genes expressed in ovarian granulosa cells have been shown to contain functional E-box sequences. These include genes that are developmentally regulated at an early stage of ovarian cell differentiation, such as SF-1 (52, 60, 61, 62) and the FSH receptor (63, 64), as well as genes that are hormonally regulated at later stages of granulosa cell differentiation, such as RIIbeta (43, 65) and PGS-2 (15, 27, 38). As shown herein, the E-box of each of these genes binds USF present in rat granulosa extracts. The different patterns of expression of these genes during follicular development and in other selected tissues indicate that E-box regions exhibit different functional activities by interacting with different upstream regulatory regions and trans-acting factors in a cell specific manner. For example, although the E-box region of the mouse PGS-2 gene binds more proteins in fibroblasts than in granulosa cells, the E-box region of the mouse PGS-2 gene appeared less important for the expression of PGS-2 transgenes in NIH 3T3 cells stimulated by v-src (36), than the E-box region of the rat PGS-2 genes expressed in rat granulosa cells stimulated by either LH or GnRH. Likewise, a region containing the E-box of the RIIbeta gene is important for cAMP regulation in rat granulosa cells (43) and binds USF. Although the mouse RIIbeta E-box binds more proteins in CHO extracts than in granulosa cell extracts, the magnitude of the effect of the E-box mutations in the RIIbeta transgenes expressed in CHO and Nb2a cells (51) was far less than that observed for E-box mutants of SF-1 transgenes expressed in steroidogenic tissues (52) and E-box mutants of PGS-2 transgenes expressed in granulosa cells. Last, despite the presence of E-box proteins in CV-1 cells, SF-1 mRNA is not expresssed in these cells; nor did these cells express SF-1 transgenes (52). Taken together, these observations indicate that the functional potency of the E-box regions of these genes is greater in steroidogenic cells than in fibroblasts and that the differences in potency likely depend on the relative amount and type of E-box binding proteins, as well as specific regions of the promoters and the cell specific factors binding to these regions. Thus, if USF is ubiquitous and constitutively expressed in granulosa cells, other factors must contribute to the developmental and hormone-induced expression of the PGS-2, RIIbeta , SF-1, and FSH receptor genes at specific stages of granulosa cell differentiation by agonists.

The complexity of the regulation of the PGS-2 gene in multiple tissues is further underscored by the presence of other regions that confer activity in a cell specific manner. Previous studies in our laboratory (38) as well as those of others (33, 34, 35) have indicated that the consensus CAAT site binds C/EBPs and in certain conditions can confer agonist trans-activation of the PGS-2 gene. However, in the present study, when the CAAT site was mutated within the context of the intact promoter, no decrease in basal or agonist stimulated CAT activity was observed. Thus, although the CAAT box is capable of conferring agonist induction to the PGS-2 gene in the absence of the E-box cis-element, this may be due to the ability of C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta to interact with the other components of the transcriptional machinery, whereas in the presence of USF, this interaction either does not occur, is not required or based on results with the human PGS-2 promoter, is altered to exert an inhibitory effect. Specifically, the activity of the human PGS-2 promoter in bovine arterial endothelial cells and of the mouse promoter in the osteoblastic cell line, MC3T3-E1, are highly responsive to the C/EBP site in an isoform specific manner (34, 35). C/EBPdelta , and not C/EBPalpha and C/EBPbeta , is induced in bovine arterial endothelial cells by 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-3-acetate and lipopolysaccharide. Moreover, when a C/EBPdelta expression vector was cotransfected with a human PGS-2 reporter construct into bovine arterial endothelial cells containing 327 bp of 5'-flanking sequence (including C/EBP, CRE, and putative E-box sequences), luciferase activity was markedly increased. Co-transfection with C/EBPbeta and C/EBPalpha vectors decreased the response (34). In granulosa cells, C/EBPbeta , rather than C/EBPdelta , mRNA, and protein are induced in response to LH, whereas C/EBPalpha is decreased (38). Therefore, C/EBPbeta or C/EBPalpha may be candidates for factors that mediate the rapid decrease in trans-activation of the rat PGS-2 gene in response to the ovulatory LH surge.

In summary, transcriptional regulation of the PGS-2 gene is multifaceted. The trans-acting factors and cis-acting DNA elements that mediate trans-activation of the endogenous PGS-2 gene and chimeric PGS-2 transgenes appear to be dependent on the cell type, the agonists used to stimulate cellular signaling pathways and the species specific promoter elements. In this study we have shown that the integrity of the E-box region of the rat PGS-2 gene is required for expression in granulosa cells and appears to interact with upstream cis-acting elements other than the CAAT box to confer hormonal regulation of this gene in rat granulosa cells. The E-box region of the rat PGS-2 promoter binds USF (as do E-box regions of other genes regulated in the ovary), but does not contain ATF/CRE activity found in the human and mouse PGS-2 promoters.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HD-16229 and the Reproductive Biology: Regulatory Mechanisms Training Grant HD-07165. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    To whom correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology, One Baylor Plaza, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-798-6259; Fax: 713-790-1275; E-mail: joanner{at}bcm.tmc.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: PGS, prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase; LH, luteinizing hormone; GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; FSH-R, follicle-stimulating hormone-receptor; USF, upstream stimulatory factor; bp, base pair(s); C/EBP, CAAT/enhancer binding protein; ATF, activating transcription factor; CRE, cAMP response element; CREB, cAMP response element binding protein; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; SF-1, steroidogenic factor-1; RIIbeta , type II regulatory subunit of protein kinase A; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Mt, mutant; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; rPGS-2, rat PGS-2.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Michelle Sawadogo, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, for providing USF antibody and Dr. Marc Montminy, Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA, for providing the CREB antibody. We also thank Dr. Ming Jer-Tsai for critically reading the manuscript.


REFERENCES

  1. Smith, W. L., Marnett, L. J. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1083, 1-17 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. DeWitt, D. L. (1991) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1083, 121-134 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Espey, L. L. (1980) Biol. Reprod. 22, 73-106 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Espey, L. L., Lipner, H. (1994) The Physiology of Reproduction (Knobil, E., Neill, J. D., eds) , 2nd Ed. , p. 725, Raven Press, New York
  5. Lau, I. F., Saksena, S. K., Chang, M. C. (1974) J. Reprod. Fertil. 40, 467-469 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Armstrong, D. T., Grinwich, D. L. (1972) Prostaglandins 1, 21-28 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Orczyk, G. P., Behrman, H. R. (1972) Prostaglandins 1, 3-20 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Tsafriri, A., Lindner, H. R., Zor, U., Lamprecht, S. A. (1972) Prostaglandins 2, 1-10 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Espey, L. L. (1982) Prostaglandins 23, 329-335 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. O'Grady, J. P., Caldwell, B. V., Auletta, F. J., Speroff, L. (1972) Prostaglandins 2, 1-10
  11. Ainsworth, L., Tsang, B. K., Downey, B. R., Baker, R. D., Marcus, G. J., Armstrong, D. T. (1979) Biol. Reprod. 21, 401-411 [Abstract]
  12. Dinchuk, J. E., Car, B. D., Focht, R. J., Johnston, J. J., Jaffee, B. D., Covington, M. B., Contel, N. R., Eng, V. M., Collins, R. J., Czerniak, P. M., Gorry, S. A., Trzaskos, J. M. (1995) Nature 378, 406-409 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Langenbach, R., Morham, S. G., Tiano, H. F., Loftin, C. D., Ghanayem, B. I., Chulada, P. C., Mahler, J. F., Lee, C. A., Goulding, E. H., Kluckman, K. D., Kim, H. S., Smithies, O. (1995) Cell 83, 483-492 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Wong, W. Y. L., Richards, J. S. (1991) Mol. Endocrinol. 5, 1269-1279 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sirois, J., Richards, J. S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 6382-6388 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. DeWitt, D. L., Smith, W. L. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 1412-1416 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Merlie, J. P., Fagan, D., Mudd, J., Needleman, P. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 3550-3553 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Yokayama, C., Takai, T., Tanabe, T. (1988) FEBS Lett. 231, 347-351 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Xie, W., Chipman, J. G., Robertson, D. L., Erickson, R. L., Simmons, D. L. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 2692-2696 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Rosen, G. D., Birkenmeier, T. M., Ras, A., Holtzman, M. J. (1989) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 164, 1358-1365 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Kujubu, D. A., Reddy, S. T., Fletcher, B. S., Herschman, H. R. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5425-5430 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Herschman, H. R. (1994) Cancer Metastasis Rev. 13, 241-256 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Wong, W. Y. L., Richards, J. S. (1992) Endocrinology 130, 3512-3521 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Hedin, L., Gaddy-Kurten, D., Kurten, R., DeWitt, D. L., Smith, W. L., Richards, J. S. (1987) Endocrinology 121, 722-731 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sirois, J., Simmons, D. L., Richards, J. S. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 11586-11592 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Morris, J. K., Richards, J. S. (1993) Endocrinology 133, 770-779 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Morris, J. K., Richards, J. S. (1995) Endocrinology 136, 1549-1558 [Abstract]
  28. Fletcher, B. S., Kujubu, D. A., Perrin, D. M., Herschman, H. R. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4338-4344 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Kraemer, S. A., Meade, E. A., DeWitt, D. L. (1992) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 293, 391-400 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Xie, W., Merrill, J. R., Bradshaw, W. S., Simmons, D. L. (1993) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 300, 247-252 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Sirois, J., Levy, L., Simmons, D. L., Richards, J. S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 12199-12206 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Kosaka, T., Miyata, A., Ihara, H., Hara, S., Sugimoto, T., Takeda, O., Eakahashi, E., Tanabe, T. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 221, 889-897 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Inoue, H., Nanayama, T., Hara, S., Yokoyama, C., Tanabe, T. (1994) FEBS Lett. 350, 51-54 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Inoue, H., Yokoyama, C., Hara, S., Tone, Y., Tanabe, T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 24965-24971 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Yamamoto, K., Arakawa, T., Ueda, N., Yamamoto, S. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 31315-31320 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Xie, W., Fletcher, B. S., Andersen, R. D., Herschman, H. R. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6531-6539 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Xie, W., Herschman, H. R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27622-27628 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Sirois, J., Richards, J. S. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 21931-21938 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ratoosh, S. L., Richards, J. S. (1985) Endocrinology 117, 917-927 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Fitzpatrick, S. L., Richards, J. S. (1991) Endocrinology 129, 1452-1462 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Natraj, U., Richards, J. S. (1993) Endocrinology 133, 761-769 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  43. Kurten, R. C., Levy, L., Shey, J., Durica, J. M., Richards, J. S. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 536-550 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Gorman, C. M., Moffat, L. F., Howard, B. H. (1982) Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 1044-1051 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Welte, T., Garimorth, K., Philipp, S., Doppler, W. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 1091-1102 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Fitzpatrick, S. L., Richards, J. S. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 341-354 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Garner, M. M., Revzin, A. (1981) Nucleic Acids Res. 9, 3047-3060 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Higuchi, R., Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J., White, T. J. (eds) (1990) PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications , p. 177, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
  49. Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., Struhl, K. (eds) (1987) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology , p. 12.2.1, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  50. Bendall, A. J., Molloy, P. L. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 2801-2810 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Singh, I. S., Luo, Z., Kozlowski, M. T., Erlichman, J. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 1163-1174 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Nomura, M., Bärtsch, S., Nawata, H., Omura, T., Morohashi, K. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 7453-7461 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Heckert, L. L., Daley, I. J., Griswold, M. D. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 70-80 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Goetz, T. L., and Griswold, M. D. (1995) Biol. Reprod. 50, Suppl. 1, 98
  55. Richards, J. S. (1994) Endocr. Rev. 15, 725-751 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Sirois, J. (1994) Endocrinology 135, 841-848 [Abstract]
  57. Sirito, M., Lin, Q., Maity, T., Sawadogo, M. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 427-433 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Kirschaum, B. J., Pognonec, P., Roeder, R. G. (1992) Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 5094-5101 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Zawel, L., Reinberg, D. (1993) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 44, 67-108 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Meier, J. L., Xu, L., Sawadogo, M., Straus, S. E. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 6896-6906 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Lala, D. S., Rice, D. A., Parker, K. L. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 1249-1258 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Ikeda, Y., Shen, W.-H., Ingraham, H., Parker, K. L. (1994) Mol. Endocrinol. 8, 654-662 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Richards, J. S. (1980) Physiol. Rev. 60, 51-89 [Free Full Text]
  64. Tilly, J. L., LaPolt, P. S., Hsueh, A. J. (1992) Endocrinology 130, 1296-1302 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Jahnsen, T., Hedin, L., Kidd, V. J., Beattie, W. G., Lohmann, S. M., Walter, U., Durica, J., Schulz, T. Z., Schiltz, E., Browner, M., Lawrence, C. B., Goldman, D., Ratoosh, S. L., Richards, J. S. (1986) J. Biol. Chem. 261, 12352-12361 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. Liu, E.-S. Park, and M. Jo
Runt-Related Transcription Factor 1 Regulates Luteinized Hormone-Induced Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthase 2 Expression in Rat Periovulatory Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology, July 1, 2009; 150(7): 3291 - 3300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. L. Johnson, M. J. Haugen, and D. C. Woods
Role for Inhibitor of Differentiation/Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Binding (Id) Proteins in Granulosa Cell Differentiation
Endocrinology, June 1, 2008; 149(6): 3187 - 3195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
D. L. Russell and R. L. Robker
Molecular mechanisms of ovulation: co-ordination through the cumulus complex
Hum. Reprod. Update, May 1, 2007; 13(3): 289 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
M. Shimada, I. Hernandez-Gonzalez, I. Gonzalez-Robayna, and J. S. Richards
Paracrine and Autocrine Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Factors in Cumulus Oocyte Complexes and Granulosa Cells: Key Roles for Prostaglandin Synthase 2 and Progesterone Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol., June 1, 2006; 20(6): 1352 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Sayasith, J. G. Lussier, and J. Sirois
Role of Upstream Stimulatory Factor Phosphorylation in the Regulation of the Prostaglandin G/H Synthase-2 Promoter in Granulosa Cells
J. Biol. Chem., August 12, 2005; 280(32): 28885 - 28893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. Joo, Y. S. Hahn, M. Kwon, R. T. Sadikot, T. S. Blackwell, and J. W. Christman
Hepatitis C Virus Core Protein Suppresses NF-{kappa}B Activation and Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression by Direct Interaction with I{kappa}B Kinase {beta}
J. Virol., June 15, 2005; 79(12): 7648 - 7657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. Gillio-Meina, Y. Y. Hui, and H. A. LaVoie
Expression of CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Proteins Alpha and Beta in the Porcine Ovary and Regulation in Primary Cultures of Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2005; 72(5): 1194 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
V. Vila-del Sol and M. Fresno
Involvement of TNF and NF-{kappa}B in the Transcriptional Control of Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression by IFN-{gamma} in Macrophages
J. Immunol., March 1, 2005; 174(5): 2825 - 2833.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. K. Pathak, A. Bhattacharyya, S. Pathak, C. Basak, D. Mandal, M. Kundu, and J. Basu
Toll-like Receptor 2 and Mitogen- and Stress-activated Kinase 1 Are Effectors of Mycobacterium avium-induced Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Macrophages
J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55127 - 55136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
J. Sirois, K. Sayasith, K. A. Brown, A. E. Stock, N. Bouchard, and M. Dore
Cyclooxygenase-2 and its role in ovulation: a 2004 account
Hum. Reprod. Update, September 1, 2004; 10(5): 373 - 385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Sayasith, N. Bouchard, M. Sawadogo, J. G. Lussier, and J. Sirois
Molecular Characterization and Role of Bovine Upstream Stimulatory Factor 1 and 2 in the Regulation of the Prostaglandin G/H Synthase-2 Promoter in Granulosa Cells
J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2004; 279(8): 6327 - 6336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Joo, G. Y. Park, J. G. Wright, T. S. Blackwell, M. L. Atchison, and J. W. Christman
Transcriptional Regulation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene in Macrophages by PU.1
J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2004; 279(8): 6658 - 6665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Yamada, H. Kawata, T. Mizutani, T. Arima, T. Yazawa, K. Matsuura, Z. Shou, T. Sekiguchi, M. Yoshino, T. Kajitani, et al.
Gene Expression of Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor, SHARP-2, Is Regulated by Gonadotropins in the Rat Ovary and MA-10 Cells
Biol Reprod, January 1, 2004; 70(1): 76 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
A. E. Falender, R. Lanz, D. Malenfant, L. Belanger, and J. S. Richards
Differential Expression of Steroidogenic Factor-1 and FTF/LRH-1 in the Rodent Ovary
Endocrinology, August 1, 2003; 144(8): 3598 - 3610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. K. Rao, S. Maiti, H. N. Ananthaswamy, and M. F. Wilkinson
A Highly Active Homeobox Gene Promoter Regulated by Ets and Sp1 Family Members in Normal Granulosa Cells and Diverse Tumor Cell Types
J. Biol. Chem., July 12, 2002; 277(29): 26036 - 26045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. Schroer, Y. Zhu, M. A. Saunders, W.-G. Deng, X.-M. Xu, J. Meyer-Kirchrath, and K. K. Wu
Obligatory Role of Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Response Element in Cyclooxygenase-2 Promoter Induction and Feedback Regulation by Inflammatory Mediators
Circulation, June 11, 2002; 105(23): 2760 - 2765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y.-L. Wu and M. C. Wiltbank
Transcriptional Regulation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene Changes from Protein Kinase (PK) A- to PKC-Dependence after Luteinization of Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2002; 66(5): 1505 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Calomme, T. L.-A. Nguyen, Y. de Launoit, V. Kiermer, L. Droogmans, A. Burny, and C. Van Lint
Upstream Stimulatory Factors Binding to an E Box Motif in the R Region of the Bovine Leukemia Virus Long Terminal Repeat Stimulates Viral Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem., March 8, 2002; 277(11): 8775 - 8789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
Y.-L. Wu and M. C. Wiltbank
Transcriptional Regulation of Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene in Ovine Large Luteal Cells
Biol Reprod, November 1, 2001; 65(5): 1565 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
T. Takano, A. V. Cybulsky, X. Yang, and L. Aoudjit
Complement C5b-9 induces cyclooxygenase-2 gene transcription in glomerular epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2001; 281(5): F841 - F850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
C. Zeng and A. R. Morrison
Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton regulates cytokine-induced iNOS expression
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2001; 281(3): C932 - C940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
T. SUGIMOTO, M. HANEDA, H. SAWANO, K. ISSHIKI, S. MAEDA, D. KOYA, K. INOKI, H. YASUDA, A. KASHIWAGI, and R. KIKKAWA
Endothelin-1 Induces Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression Via Nuclear Factor of Activated T-Cell Transcription Factor in Glomerular Mesangial Cells
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2001; 12(7): 1359 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. S. Richards
Perspective: The Ovarian Follicle--A Perspective in 2001
Endocrinology, June 1, 2001; 142(6): 2184 - 2193.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
K. Yamada, T. Mizutani, Z. Shou, T. Yazawa, T. Sekiguchi, M. Yoshino, T. Inazu, and K. Miyamoto
Cloning and Functional Expression of an E Box-Binding Protein from Rat Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2001; 64(5): 1315 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. Liu, M. Antaya, A. K. Goff, D. Boerboom, D. W. Silversides, J. G. Lussier, and J. Sirois
Molecular Characterization of Bovine Prostaglandin G/H Synthase-2 and Regulation in Uterine Stromal Cells
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2001; 64(3): 983 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
J. S. Richards
New Signaling Pathways for Hormones and Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosphate Action in Endocrine Cells
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 2001; 15(2): 209 - 218.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. Vogel, A.-M. J.F. Boerboom, C. Baechle, C. El-Bahay, R. Kahl, G. H. Degen, and J. Abel
Regulation of prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase-2 induction by dioxin in rat hepatocytes: possible c-Src-mediated pathway
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2000; 21(12): 2267 - 2274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. E. Lipsky, P. Brooks, L. J. Crofford, R. DuBois, D. Graham, L. S. Simon, L. B. A. van de Putte, and S. B. Abramson
Unresolved Issues in the Role of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Normal Physiologic Processes and Disease
Arch Intern Med, April 10, 2000; 160(7): 913 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. A.F. Daggett, D. A. Rice, and L. L. Heckert
Expression of Steroidogenic Factor 1 in the Testis Requires an E Box and CCAAT Box in its Promoter Proximal Region
Biol Reprod, March 1, 2000; 62(3): 670 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. J. Wadleigh, S. T. Reddy, E. Kopp, S. Ghosh, and H. R. Herschman
Transcriptional Activation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene in Endotoxin-treated RAW 264.7 Macrophages
J. Biol. Chem., February 25, 2000; 275(9): 6259 - 6266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. T. Reddy, D. J. Wadleigh, and H. R. Herschman
Transcriptional Regulation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene in Activated Mast Cells
J. Biol. Chem., February 4, 2000; 275(5): 3107 - 3113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Liu, M. Antaya, D. Boerboom, J. G. Lussier, D. W. Silversides, and J. Sirois
The Delayed Activation of the Prostaglandin G/H Synthase-2 Promoter in Bovine Granulosa Cells Is Associated with Down-regulation of Truncated Upstream Stimulatory Factor-2
J. Biol. Chem., December 3, 1999; 274(49): 35037 - 35045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Ji, Y. Chen, M. Centrella, and T. L. McCarthy
Activation of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-5 Promoter in Osteoblasts by Cooperative E Box, CCAAT Enhancer-Binding Protein, and Nuclear Factor-1 Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Binding Sequences
Endocrinology, October 1, 1999; 140(10): 4564 - 4572.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. W. Slice, J. H. Walsh, and E. Rozengurt
Galpha 13 Stimulates Rho-dependent Activation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Promoter
J. Biol. Chem., September 24, 1999; 274(39): 27562 - 27566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
N. Callejas, M Casado, L Bosca, and P Martin-Sanz
Requirement of nuclear factor kappaB for the constitutive expression of nitric oxide synthase-2 and cyclooxygenase-2 in rat trophoblasts
J. Cell Sci., January 9, 1999; 112(18): 3147 - 3155.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Li and B. Seetharam
A 69-Base Pair Fragment Derived from Human Transcobalamin II Promoter Is Sufficient for High Bidirectional Activity in the Absence of a TATA Box and an Initiator Element in Transfected Cells. ROLE OF AN E BOX IN TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem., October 23, 1998; 273(43): 28170 - 28177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Kim and S. M. Fischer
Transcriptional Regulation of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Mouse Skin Carcinoma Cells. REGULATORY ROLE OF CCAAT/ENHANCER-BINDING PROTEINS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION OF CYCLOOXYGENASE-2 IN NORMAL AND NEOPLASTIC TISSUES
J. Biol. Chem., October 16, 1998; 273(42): 27686 - 27694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
R. N. Dubois, S. B. Abramson, L. Crofford, R. A. Gupta, L. S. Simon, L. B. A. van de putte, and P. E. Lipsky
Cyclooxygenase in biology and disease
FASEB J, September 1, 1998; 12(12): 1063 - 1073.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. Dumonteil, B. Laser, I. Constant, and J. Philippe
Differential Regulation of the Glucagon and Insulin I Gene Promoters by the Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors E47 and BETA2
J. Biol. Chem., August 7, 1998; 273(32): 19945 - 19954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
J. S. Richards
Editorial: Sounding the Alarm--Does Induction of Prostaglandin Endoperoxide Synthase-2 Control the Mammalian Ovulatory Clock?
Endocrinology, October 1, 1997; 138(10): 4047 - 4048.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
E. Sterneck, L. Tessarollo, and P. F. Johnson
An essential role for C/EBPbeta in female reproduction
Genes & Dev., September 1, 1997; 11(17): 2153 - 2162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. G. Woodson, P. A. Crawford, Y. Sadovsky, and J. Milbrandt
Characterization of the Promoter of SF-1, an Orphan Nuclear Receptor Required for Adrenal and Gonadal Development
Mol. Endocrinol., February 1, 1997; 11(2): 117 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. L. Smith, R. M. Garavito, and D. L. DeWitt
Prostaglandin Endoperoxide H Synthases (Cyclooxygenases)-1 and -2
J. Biol. Chem., December 27, 1996; 271(52): 33157 - 33160.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
W. Xie and H. R. Herschman
Transcriptional Regulation of Prostaglandin Synthase 2Gene Expression by Platelet-derived Growth Factor and Serum
J. Biol. Chem., December 6, 1996; 271(49): 31742 - 31748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Arakawa, O. Laneuville, C. A. Miller, K. M. Lakkides, B. A. Wingerd, D. L. DeWitt, and W. L. Smith
Prostanoid Receptors of Murine NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7Cells. STRUCTURE AND EXPRESSION OF THE MURINE PROSTAGLANDIN EP4 RECEPTOR GENE
J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 1996; 271(47): 29569 - 29575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. A. Iniguez, S. Martinez-Martinez, C. Punzon, J. M. Redondo, and M. Fresno
An Essential Role of the Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells in the Regulation of the Expression of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene in Human T Lymphocytes
J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2000; 275(31): 23627 - 23635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Xu, A. M. Robida, and T. J. Murphy
Immediate-early MEK-1-dependent Stabilization of Rat Smooth Muscle Cell Cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA by Galpha q-coupled Receptor Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., July 21, 2000; 275(30): 23012 - 23019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. J. Cok and A. R. Morrison
The 3'-Untranslated Region of Murine Cyclooxygenase-2 Contains Multiple Regulatory Elements That Alter Message Stability and Translational Efficiency
J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2001; 276(25): 23179 - 23185.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y.-S. Guo, M. R. Hellmich, X. D. Wen, and C. M. Townsend Jr.
Activator Protein-1 Transcription Factor Mediates Bombesin-stimulated Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Intestinal Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem., June 15, 2001; 276(25): 22941 - 22947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
B. Gorgoni, M. Caivano, C. Arizmendi, and V. Poli
The Transcription Factor C/EBPbeta Is Essential for Inducible Expression of the cox-2 Gene in Macrophages but Not in Fibroblasts
J. Biol. Chem., October 26, 2001; 276(44): 40769 - 40777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Caivano, B. Gorgoni, P. Cohen, and V. Poli
The Induction of Cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA in Macrophages Is Biphasic and Requires both CCAAT Enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPbeta ) and C/EBPdelta Transcription Factors
J. Biol. Chem., December 21, 2001; 276(52): 48693 - 48701.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Richards, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement