|
Volume 271, Number 28,
Issue of July 12, 1996
pp. 16633-16643
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
An E-box Region within the Prostaglandin Endoperoxide
Synthase-2 (PGS-2) Promoter Is Required for Transcription in Rat
Ovarian Granulosa Cells*
(Received for publication, February 13, 1996, and in revised form, April 15, 1996)
Jacqueline K.
Morris
and
JoAnne S.
Richards
From the Department of Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine,
Houston, Texas 77030
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase-2 (PGS-2)
gene encodes an isoform of prostaglandin synthase that is transiently
induced by protein kinase A (luteinizing hormone/cAMP) and protein
kinase C (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) agonists in granulosa cells
of ovulating follicles. The promoter of the rat PGS-2 gene contains a
CAAT enhancer-binding protein consensus site (CAAT box) which can
confer hormone inducibility to a PGS-2·CAT reporter gene, as well as
a putative E-box region. To determine if the E-box region was involved
in hormone induced trans-activation of the rat PGS-2 gene,
constructs with the CAAT box and E-box regions ( 192 PGS-2·CAT),
only the putative E-box ( 110 PGS-2·CAT), or neither region ( 52
PGS-2·CAT) were transiently transfected into rat granulosa cell
cultures. CAT activity was induced in both the 192 and 110
PGS-2·CAT vectors by luteinizing hormone (10-fold) and
gonadotropin-releasing hormone (6-fold), whereas CAT activity of the
52 PGS-2·CAT construct did not differ from the promoterless vector
(pCAT-Basic). Deletion of 1 base pair from the E-box within the 110
PGS-2·CAT construct, as well as point mutations within the CAAT box,
E-box, or both regions of the 192 PGS-2·CAT construct, demonstrated
that the E-box is critical for basal transcription, and that regions,
in addition to the CAAT box, are involved in hormone induction of the
PGS-2 gene. An oligonucleotide spanning the rat PGS-2 E-box bound two
specific protein complexes which were supershifted in the presence of
antibody specific for the upstream stimulatory factor. Thus, in rat
granulosa cells, the PGS-2 E-box region appears to interact with
upstream cis-acting elements other than the CAAT box to
confer hormonal regulation of the gene. The E-box region of the rat
PGS-2 promoter does not contain ATF/CRE activity found in the human and
mouse PGS-2 promoters, but is critical for basal transcription of the
PGS-2 gene in rat granulosa cells and binds the upstream stimulatory
factor (as do E-box regions of other genes regulated in the ovary).
INTRODUCTION
Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase
(PGS)1 catalyzes the rate-limiting step of
prostaglandin biosynthesis (1). The synthase is a homodimer with two
subunits and has two catalytic properties, a cyclooxygenase activity
that is required for the conversion of arachidonic acid to
prostaglandin G2 and a peroxidase activity that reduces
prostaglandin G2 to prostaglandin H2 (1).
Prostaglandins are associated with inflammatory responses, wound
healing, bone development, glomerular filtration and water balance, and
hemostasis (for a review, see Ref. 2). Prostaglandins have also been
shown to regulate a variety of reproductive functions, including
ovulation (3) and parturition (4). For example, ovulation is inhibited
by aspirin, indomethacin, and specific inhibitors of PGS, in mice (5),
rats (6, 7, 8), rabbits (9, 10), and pigs (11). Most recently, targeted
deletion of the PGS-2 gene has been shown to prevent ovulation in mice
(12), whereas targeted disruption of the PGS-1 gene did not alter
ovarian function, but did compromise parturition (13).
Two isoforms of the PGS enzyme are present in the rat ovary (14, 15).
Each enzyme is the product of a distinct gene as evidenced by the
cloning of cDNAs for PGS-1 (16, 17, 18) and PGS-2 (19, 20, 21). PGS-1 is
encoded by a 2.8-kilobase pair RNA transcript and the enzyme is
ubiquitously expressed in theca cells of the ovarian follicle (15), as
well as other tissues (22). PGS-2 is encoded by a 4.4-kilobase pair RNA
transcript and is rapidly induced in ovarian granulosa cells by
luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH),
forskolin, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), and epidermal growth
factor (14, 15, 23). The presence of PGS-2 mRNA in granulosa cells
corresponds to the specific immunological localization of this protein
in granulosa cells, not theca cells (14, 15, 24). PGS-2 mRNA is
rapidly and transiently induced in the ovary (25) and other tissues by
activators of several signaling pathways including protein kinase A,
protein kinase C, and tyrosine kinase pathways (22, 23, 26, 27).
The 5 -flanking region of the mouse (28, 29), chicken (30), rat (31),
and human (32) PGS-2 genes have been isolated, sequenced, and shown to
contain numerous regions of homology (Fig. 1), including
putative binding sites for these transcription factors: NF B, Sp1,
AP-2, CAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP), cAMP response element
binding protein (CREB), and E-box binding proteins. Deletion analyses
of the promoters have identified regions of functional
trans-activation between 195/32 for the rat (31), between
140/ 132 and 124/ 52 for the human (33, 34), and between
512/ 385, 186/ 131 and 80/32 for the mouse (35, 36, 37).
Fig. 1.
Comparison of the 198/32 region of the rat,
mouse, and human PGS-2 5 -flanking sequences. The E-box region is
underlined (31, 33, 36).
The functional region of the mouse PGS-2 promoter contains NF B,
C/EBP, and an overlapping ATF/CRE (5 -CGTCA-3 ) and E-box
(5 -CACGTG-3 ) transcription factor recognition sequences (35, 36, 37).
Mutational analysis of the NF B and C/EBP elements demonstrated that
both these sites were important for tumor necrosis factor- induction
of PGS-2·luciferase constructs transfected into MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic
cells (35). Mutational analysis of the ATF/CRE element within the mouse
promoter demonstrated that the ATF/CRE element, but not the E-box
element, is essential for v-src induction of
PGS-2·luciferase constructs transfected into NIH 3T3 fibroblast cells
(36). Although the E-box was not required for v-src
activation of the PGS-2 expression vectors (36), mutations of the E-box
reduced basal levels of transcription (36). Electrophoretic mobility
shift assays demonstrated that an end-labeled mouse PGS-2
oligonucleotide ( 65/ 39 bp), containing ATF/CRE and E-box elements,
bound several fibroblast extract proteins which by competition assays
and antibody analyses were identified as CREB, c-Jun, and two
E-box-binding proteins (36, 37). Furthermore, c-Jun, and not CREB, was
shown to be required for v-src induction of PGS-2 promoter
constructs in NIH 3T3 fibroblasts (37).
When human PGS-2 promoter reporter vectors were transfected into bovine
arterial endothelial cells (33) or human U937 monocytic cells (34),
various regions (NF B, CAAT box (C/EBP), and ATF/CRE) were shown to
be important for the expression of transgenes dependent upon the cell
type. Although deletion to 52 disrupted the putative human PGS-2
E-box and abolished functional activity of the human PGS-2 transgenes,
specific functional analysis of this element in the context of other
regions has not yet been reported. In addition, the human PGS-2 E-box
element is different by one base pair from the E-box element present in
the rat and mouse PGS-2 promoters (see Table I). Therefore, the human
E-box element might bind different E-box binding proteins, than those
which bind the rat or mouse PGS-2 E-box element.
In the 5 -flanking region of the rat PGS-2 gene, a CAAT box region
( 140/ 132) has been identified and shown to confer
cAMP-responsiveness when ligated to a minimal 52/32 PGS-2·CAT
reporter construct (38). Mutation of this CAAT box region decreased
cAMP inducibility of the fusion construct in rat ovarian granulosa
cells by 50%. The CAAT box binds to C/EBP and C/EBP proteins
present in nuclear extracts of rat granulosa cells (38). Furthermore,
LH induces C/EBP mRNA and decreases C/EBP mRNA
coordinately with the induction of the PGS-2 gene (38). However,
because the PGS-2·CAT fusion vectors used in these experiments
disrupted what has recently been characterized as a CRE/ATF and E-box
regulatory region in the mouse promoter, additional analyses were
required to determine the specific role of each region for
trans-activation of the rat PGS-2 promoter in ovarian
granulosa cells (38).
Based on the evidence that multiple factors bind the ATF/CRE, E-box and
CAAT elements of the PGS-2 gene, and that these regions confer
trans-activation in an agonist, cell-type, or species
promoter-specific manner, we have designed experiments to determine if
the ATF/CRE or E-box region of the rat PGS-2 promoter might also be
functionally relevant for trans-activation of the rat PGS-2
gene by LH and GnRH in granulosa cells. Transient transfection of
reporter constructs in rat granulosa cells demonstrated that the E-box
element is critical for basal activation of the PGS-2 gene in granulosa
cells and that one transcription factor which binds to this region is
an upstream stimulatory factor (USF). In addition, when specific
mutants within the CAAT box and E-box regions were made in context of
the intact promoter and ligated to a pCAT·Basic reporter construct,
the consensus C/EBP site was not essential for activation of PGS-2
reporter constructs by either LH or GnRH, suggesting that the E-box
region interacts with other cis-acting elements in the
proximal ( 110/ 52) region of the rat PGS-2 promoter.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Animals
Immature female rats (day 23 of age; weight, 55-60
g) were injected with 17 -estradiol (1.5 mg/day for 3 days) beginning
on day 24 of age (25, 39, 40). Hypophysectomized immature female rats
(day 26 of age) were obtained from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN) 1 day
after surgery. Animals were primed with 17 -estradiol (E; 1.5 mg/day
subcutaneously for 3 days) and FSH (F; 1.0 µg subcutaneously, twice
daily for 2 days) designated HE or HEF, respectively (23). Animals were
treated in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals. All protocols had the approval of the
Institutional Committee on Animal Care and Use, Baylor College of
Medicine, Houston, TX.
Granulosa Cell Culture
Ovaries from immature rats primed
with 17 -estradiol were punctured with a 22-gauge needle to isolate
granulosa cells. The granulosa cells were pooled, treated with trypsin
(20 µg/ml) for 1 min, followed by addition of soybean trypsin
inhibitor (300 µg/ml) and DNase I (160 µg/ml) to remove necrotic
cells, as described previously (39). Cells were washed twice and then
cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium:F12 supplemented with
ovine FSH (50 ng/ml) and testosterone (10 ng/ml) at 37 °C in 95%
air and 5% CO2. After 48 h, granulosa cells cultured
under these conditions acquire a preovulatory phenotype (39, 40) and
respond to ovulatory doses of either FSH or LH as indicated by the
induction of specific enzymes, including PGS-2 (15, 25), and the
progesterone receptor (41) within 5-7 h.
Transient Transfection Assay
Plasmid DNA was purified from
bacteria by alkaline lysis and centrifugation on CsCl gradients (42).
The differentiated granulosa cells were transfected with 12.5 µg/well
of plasmid DNA as described previously (43). Briefly, the plasmid DNA
was precipitated by dropwise addition of a 250 mM CaCl and
plasmid DNA mixture in an equal volume of 2 × HEPES-buffered
saline (280 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM
Na2HPO4, 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.2) and
incubated at room temperature for 30 min. After the addition of fresh
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium:F12 to the differentiated
granulosa cells, 300 µl of the DNA precipitate were added dropwise to
each well. For transfection, the cells were incubated for 4 h at
37 °C in 95% air and 5% CO2, washed once with Hanks'
buffered medium without calcium or magnesium, and treated with either
no hormone, LH (500 ng/ml), or GnRH (1 µM). After 6 h, the granulosa cells were washed with 2 ml of ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4), harvested by gentle scraping
with a rubber policeman in 1 ml of TEN (10 mM Tris-Cl (pH
8.0), 1 mM EDTA (pH 8.0), 0.1 M NaCl), and
centrifuged (12,000 × g, 4 °C) to obtain a cell
pellet. The cell pellet was resuspended in 100 µl of 0.25 M Tris-HCl, frozen on dry ice-ethanol, thawed, followed by
two additional freeze/thaw cycles, and finally clarified by
centrifugation at 4 °C at 12,000 × g. CAT activity
in the lysates (25 µg of protein) was measured in the presence of 25 mM acetyl-coenzyme A and 2 µl per reaction of
[14C]chloramphenicol as described previously (44).
Whole Cell and Nuclear Extracts
Whole cell extracts were
prepared from R2C cells as described previously (45). Nuclear extracts
of granulosa cells isolated from hormonally primed rats were prepared
as described previously (31, 46), designated HE and HEF. Nuclear
extracts were also prepared from granulosa cells isolated from HEF rats
2 h after an intravenous injection of human chorionic gonadotropin
(hCG, 10 IU) designated HEF + hCG (2 h).
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
Electrophoretic
mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were performed as described elsewhere
(31, 47). Briefly, nuclear extracts (1 µg of protein/reaction) or
whole cell extracts (10 µg/reaction) were incubated with 5 fmol
(20,000-30,000 cpm) of end-labeled oligonucleotides containing E-box
sites: rat PGS-2 67/ 41, mouse PGS-2 65/ 39, human PGS-2, rat
steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1), mouse type II regulatory subunit of
protein kinase A (RII ), or rat follicle stimulating hormone-receptor
(FSH-R; see Table I), and 5.5 µg of poly(dI-dC) in a final volume of
20 µl in buffer containing 50 mM KCl, 15 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 5 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM
EDTA, 5 mM MgCl2, and 12% glycerol. When
antibodies were used, the nuclear extracts were preincubated for 15 min
with the antiserum prior to the addition of other reagents. The binding
reactions were resolved by electrophoresis using a 5% acrylamide gel
and 0.5 × TBE (45 mM Tris borate, 1 mM
EDTA) as the gel and electrophoresis buffer.
Immunoblot Analyses
Proteins of whole cell lysates from
granulosa cell cultures were resolved by one-dimensional
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (4.5% stacking gel and 10%
separating gel) at 60 mA/gel for 1 h. Proteins were transferred to
nitrocellulose filters (0.45 µM) overnight at 30 V and
blocked in 5% milk, PBS (80 mM disodium hydrogen
orthophosphate anhydrous, 20 mM sodium dihydrogen
orthophosphate, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5) with 0.1% Tween-20
(PBS-T) for 1 h, washed in PBS-T for 5 min (three times). The
nitrocellulose filter was incubated in a 1:5000 dilution of USF
antibody (from Dr. M. Sawadogo, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,
TX) in PBS-T, 5% milk for 1 h at room temperature. The membrane
was washed once for 15 min and three times for 5 min in PBS-T, then
incubated in anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G conjugated to horseradish
peroxidase (1:10,000 dilution) for 1 h at room temperature. The
filter was washed once for 15 min and three times for 5 min. The
immunopositive proteins were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence
(ECL), as described by Amersham Corp.
Cloning
The rat 110 PGS-2·CAT fusion construct was
created by ligating a double-stranded 110/ 53 oligonucleotide
(5 -AGC TGG GGG GGT GGG GGG GTG GGG AAA GCC GAG GCG GAA AGA CAC AGT CAC
GAA GTC AC-3 ) to the 52/32 PGS-2·CAT construct (38). The latter
was produced by digesting a 628/32 PGS-2·CAT construct with
HindIII and BbrI. The 110 mutant (Mt)
PGS-2·CAT fusion construct was created as above using a 110/ 54
oligonucleotide (5 -AGC TGG GGG GGT GGG GGG GTG GGG AAA GCC GAG GCG GAA
AGA CAC AGT CAC GAA GTC A-3 ). This created a 1-base pair deletion
within the putative E-box element (CACGTG to CA_GTG).
Three additional mutations of the PGS-2 promoter were created using the
195/32 PGS-2·CAT construct as a template, 195/32 (C/EBP Mt)
PGS-2·CAT, 195/32 (E-box Mt) PGS-2·CAT and a 195/32 (Double Mt)
PGS-2·CAT. The C/EBP Mt was created by substituting four base pairs
within the CAAT box that disrupts the binding of C/EBP and protein. In EMSA, the C/EBP mutant oligonucleotide did not compete for
the binding of C/EBPs to a labeled 195/ 110 DNA fragment (25). The
E-box mutant was created with an oligonucleotide containing a two base
pair substitution which also fails to compete for the binding of
proteins to a labeled wild type 64/ 41 oligonucleotide (see Fig.
3A, lane 7). Finally, the Double Mt includes
these same mutations within both the CAAT box and the E-box.
Fig. 3.
Granulosa cell nuclear extracts prepared from
granulosa cells at various stages of differentiation form specific
protein-DNA complexes with the rat PGS-2 E-box oligonucleotide.
A, granulosa cells of preovulatory follicles were obtained from
17 -estradiol and FSH primed hypophysectomized (HEF) rats.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed with
32P-labeled rPGS-2 ( 67/ 41) oligonucleotide (lane
1) using nuclear extracts (1 µg of protein) of HEF granulosa
cells collected 2 h after an injection of an ovulatory dose of hCG
(HEF + hCG (2 h); lanes 2-7). An increasing molar (10-, 20-, and 50-fold) excess of the self-competitor DNA (lanes 3 and 4), the 110/ 54 oligonucleotide or a mutated E-box
element (CACGTG to CACtTt; lane 7) oligonucleotide were used
as competitor DNA (100-fold molar excess) to demonstrate the
specificity of protein binding to the E-box oligonucleotide. Specific
protein-DNA complexes are indicated by the arrows labeled
I and II. B, nuclear extracts were prepared from
granulosa cells of different developmental stages. The
32P-labeled rat PGS-2 ( 67/ 41) oligonucleotide was
incubated with nuclear extracts (1 µg) of small antral
(HE; lane 2), preovulatory (HEF;
lane 3), and ovulatory follicles (HEF + hCG (2 h); lane 4) or with whole cell extracts (10 µg)
collected from R2C Leydig cells, a rat Leydig cell line (lane
5). As demonstrated, complexes I and II (arrows) were
present during all stages of follicular development and in the R2C
Leydig cell lysates.
The mutations (indicated by lowercase) within the 195 to 32 base
pairs of the PGS-2 promoter were created by the polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) using mutant oligonucleotides to the CAAT box (5 -GGT
ATT ATt Ccc aTG GAA GC-3 and 5 -GCT TCC
Atg gGa ATA ATA CC-3 ) and the E-box (5 -AGT CAC
GAA GTC ACt TtG AGT CCA-3 and 5 -AAG TGG ACT
CaA aGT GAC TTC GT-3 ), external primers that
would hybridize at each end of the promoter region to be cloned (5 -GCC
AAG CTT CCT GGC TTC TC-3 and 5 -TGC TCT AGA GCT ACT CCT GAA GCT CTC
CGC TC-3 ), and 195/32 PGS-2·CAT fusion construct as a template for
the E-box and C/EBP mutant oligonucleotides. The 195/32 (Double Mt)
PGS-2·CAT was generated with the same external oligonucleotides, the
E-box mutant oligonucleotides and the 195/32 (C/EBP Mt) PGS-2·CAT
construct as the template. The cloning procedure was as described in
PCR protocols (48). The first round of PCR consisted of 30 cycles at
72 °C (1 min), 42 °C (1 min), and 95 °C (1 min). The PCR
products were then separated and purified from a 2% agarose gel
utilizing NA45 paper (Schleicher & Schuell) and eluted as described
previously (49). The second round of PCR utilized 15 cycles of 72 °C
(1 min), 42 °C (1 min), and 95 °C (1 min), followed by an
additional 15 cycles with an annealing temperature of 50 C. The PCR
products were isolated as above, digested with HindIII and
XbaI, and ligated into the HindIII and
XbaI sites of a digested pCAT·Basic vector. All plasmids
were sequenced on an automated sequencer according to Taq
DyeDeoxy Terminator cycle sequencing for verification of the mutations
(University of Texas-Houston, Core Facility).
RESULTS
An E-box cis-Acting DNA Element Is Required for Transcriptional
Activation of rPGS-2 Promoter in Rat Ovarian Granulosa
Cells
Previous functional analyses of rat PGS-2·CAT promoter
expression vectors in primary ovarian granulosa cells demonstrated that
195 base pairs of the proximal promoter were sufficient to confer LH,
FSH, and forskolin inducibility to the PGS-2·CAT vectors (38). A CAAT
box element within this region ( 195/ 110) was shown to bind C/EBP
proteins, specifically C/EBP and C/EBP , and to confer cAMP (FSH,
LH, and forskolin) inducibility if ligated to a minimally active
52/32 PGS-2·CAT construct (38). Transfection of the
( 192/ 110)( 52/32) PGS-2·CAT fusion construct exhibited a
decrease in basal transcription (38). Based on recent reports, this
construct disrupted the ATF/CRE and/or E-box region ( 67/ 39) (33,
36).
To determine the functional activity of the 110/ 53 region of the
rat PGS-2 promoter, we have made additional constructs by ligating a
110/ 53 oligonucleotide onto the 52 PGS-2·CAT fusion construct.
A mutant construct ( 110 mt PGS-2·CAT) with a 1-base pair deletion
within the E-box region (CACGTG to CA_GTG) was also created. The 195,
110, 110 Mt, and 52 PGS-2·CAT constructs were transiently
transfected into differentiated granulosa cells and exposed to LH (Fig.
2A). All values were measured within the
linear range of the assay and then adjusted to the relative CAT
activity for 25 µg of protein extract. The vector pCAT·Control
(Promega, Madison, WI), which contains the simian virus 40 promoter and
enhancer, was utilized in each transfection experiment as a control for
transfection efficiency. The pCAT·Control vector routinely displayed
a relative CAT activity of 80 ± 10 indicating that transfection
efficiency was reproducible among all experiments. The 195
PGS-2·CAT vector exhibited significantly higher relative basal
activity than pCAT·Basic, which lacks a promoter. This was reduced
33% with the 110 PGS-2·CAT construct, which lacks the CAAT box
element ( 142/ 139). Basal activity decreased an additional 40% by
mutation of the E-box. The relative CAT activity stimulated by LH was
88.7 ± 18 and 30 ± 10 relative activity for the 195 and
110 PGS-2·CAT constructs, respectively. However, the relative CAT
activity of the 110 Mt vector induced by LH, was not different from
the 52 PGS-2·CAT construct, 5.5 ± 3 and 3.6 ± 0.2, respectively. Thus, by disrupting the E-box region, basal, as well as
LH-induced, trans-activation of the 110 PGS-2·CAT
reporter construct was reduced in differentiated granulosa cell
cultures. Collectively, these data indicate that the E-box region is a
functional cis-acting DNA element within the rat PGS-2
promoter that is essential for transcriptional activation of the PGS-2
gene in granulosa cells.
Fig. 2.
Transcriptional activation of rPGS-2
promoter·CAT constructs in ovarian granulosa cell cultures requires
an E-box cis-acting DNA element. A, deletion or
mutational constructs of the PGS-2 promoter ligated to pCAT-Basic
expression vector are shown schematically (left panel). Two
important functional domains present in the PGS-2 promoter (CCAAT box
and E-box) are identified. After transfection of the 195, 110,
110 Mt, and 52 PGS-2·CAT constructs into differentiated granulosa
cells, the cells (see ``Experimental Procedures'') were treated
without (gray bars) or with LH (500 ng/ml; black
bars) for 6 h. The relative activity of PGS-2·CAT vectors
are expressed as the mean ± S.E. of three independent
experiments. Relative activity was determined and normalized for all
samples as the percent conversion for 25 µg of protein. Fold
induction by LH for pCAT·Basic, 195, 110, 110 Mt, and the 52
PGS-2·CAT constructs was 1.75-, 8.2-, 10-, 4-, and 4-fold,
respectively. B, the same constructs (shown schematically;
left panel) were transiently transfected into differentiated
granulosa cells and treated without (gray bars) or with GnRH
(1 µM; hatched bars). Relative CAT activity
was calculated as in panel A for three independent
experiments. Fold induction by GnRH for the pCAT·Basic, 195, 110,
110 Mt, and the 52 PGS-2·CAT constructs was 1-, 3-, 6-, 2.4-, and
1.8-fold, respectively.
Previous studies have demonstrated that two distinct signaling pathways
induce PGS-2 mRNA and protein in preovulatory granulosa cells (23,
26, 27). One pathway involves LH activation of protein kinase A; the
other involves GnRH activation of protein kinase C (27). In order to
determine if the regions of the rat PGS-2 promoter, that are activated
by LH, are also activated by GnRH, the 195, 110, 110 Mt, and 52
PGS·CAT constructs were transiently transfected into differentiated
granulosa cells and exposed to GnRH (1 µM; Fig.
2B). The relative basal level of CAT activity measured in
granulosa cells transfected with pCAT·Basic was minimal and was not
altered by addition of GnRH to the cultures. Addition of GnRH increased
CAT activity produced by the 195 PGS-2 construct 3-fold, a level of
CAT activity approximately one-third of that induced by LH. Relative
CAT activity of the 110 PGS-2·CAT construct induced by GnRH did not
significantly decrease compared to the 195 PGS-2 CAT construct, while
the fold induction of 110 PGS-2·CAT by GnRH increased from 3- to
6-fold due to a decrease in the basal activity of the 110 PGS-2·CAT
construct. Disruption of the E-box cis-element within
constructs, 110 Mt and 52 PGS-2·CAT, decreased GnRH induction
50%, when compared to the nonmutated 110 PGS-2·CAT promoter
construct. These data support the obligatory role of the E-box element
for trans-activation of the PGS-2 gene by these two distinct
signaling pathways in granulosa cells.
Binding of Protein Complexes to the E-box Is Not Determined by the
Stage of Follicular Development
As mentioned above, the mouse
PGS-2 promoter contains an ATF/CRE and E-box region that is activated
in NIH 3T3 cells by cotransfection with a v-src expression
plasmid (36). Mutation of these elements within the promoter
demonstrated that the ATF/CRE element, but not the E-box, is important
for v-src trans-activation of the mouse PGS-2 promoter in
NIH 3T3 cells (36). Although the E-box cis-element did not
appear to be involved in the v-src induction of the PGS-2
gene in NIH 3T3 cells, a decrease in basal transcription was seen when
the E-box element was mutated (36).
To determine if similar, or the same proteins, might bind to the E-box
region ( 67/ 41) of the rat PGS-2 promoter, nuclear extracts were
prepared from preovulatory granulosa cells induced with an ovulatory
dose of hCG for 2 h; a treatment known to induce expression of the
endogenous PGS-2 gene (25). When nuclear extract protein (1 µg) was
incubated with an end-labeled 67/ 41 oligonucleotide containing the
rat PGS-2 promoter E-box element, two protein-DNA complexes were formed
(designated I and II; Fig. 3A). The binding
reaction was specific as demonstrated by the ability of 10-, 50-, and
100-fold molar excess of unlabeled 67/ 41 oligonucleotide to inhibit
complex formation (Fig. 3A, lanes 3-5).
Additionally, 100-fold excess of an oligonucleotide 5 of the E-box
region ( 110/ 54) was unable to block the formation of the two
protein-DNA complexes (Fig. 3A, lane 6). The
oligonucleotide mutated within the E-box region ( 67/ 41 Mt; CACGTG
to CACtTt) also did not prevent complex formation (Fig. 3A,
lane 7). These results indicated that granulosa cell nuclei
contained protein(s) capable of binding specifically to an E-box
element.
To determine if the E-box binding protein(s) present in the nuclear
extract of granulosa cells was hormonally regulated during follicular
development, the end-labeled 67/ 41 oligonucleotide was incubated
with nuclear extracts prepared from granulosa cells at different stages
of follicular development. Nuclear extracts were collected from
granulosa cells of preantral/small antral follicles (HE), preovulatory
follicles (HEF), and from preovulatory granulosa cells that had
received an ovulatory dose of hCG (HEF/hCG) (2 h). Both protein-DNA
complexes previously observed were present at all stages of follicular
development (Fig. 3B, lanes 2-4). Additionally,
similar protein-DNA complexes were formed with whole cell extracts
isolated from R2C cells, a rat Leydig cell line (Fig. 3B,
lane 5).
Role of the CAAT Box and E-box cis-Elements in trans-Activation of
the PGS-2 Gene
When isolated from each other, the C/EBP (38) and
E-box cis-elements appear capable of conferring functional
activation of the PGS-2 promoter by binding specific factors.
Therefore, it was essential to determine the requirement of each site
within the context of an intact promoter. The mutations within the
promoter were generated to disrupt the DNA elements binding C/EBP
and C/EBP (38), E-box proteins, or both types of transcription
factors as discussed under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The three
mutant constructs, in addition to the wild type 195 PGS-2·CAT
vector, were transiently transfected into differentiated granulosa
cells as described previously (Fig. 4A). The
relative basal CAT activity in cells transfected with the 195 PGS-2
construct was similar to that obtained for the C/EBP Mt construct
(11.5 ± 5 versus 12.3 ± 1.7, respectively).
Likewise, the relative CAT activity (91 ± 26 versus
124 ± 47), as well as fold increase (10 ± 3 versus 10 ± 3-fold), induced by LH were similar for
the 195 PGS-2·CAT and the C/EBP Mt, respectively. Thus, in the
context of the intact promoter, the consensus CAAT box is not required
for LH induction of PGS-2 promoter constructs in transient transfection
assays of granulosa cells. However, when the E-box Mt was transfected
into primary granulosa cell cultures, relative basal CAT activity in
the absence of hormone was 15% of the activity produced by the 195
PGS-2·CAT construct. The relative CAT activity induced by LH was 15%
of the activity of the nonmutated construct ( 195 PGS-2·CAT). Since
both basal and induced CAT activity decreased, the fold induction by LH
was not affected (Fig. 4A). The Double Mt construct
(harboring both the CAAT and E-box mutations) and the E-box Mt
exhibited similar basal, as well as LH induced, relative CAT activity.
The fold induction of the Double Mt by LH decreased from 9- to 5-fold
compared to the 195 PGS-2·CAT (Fig. 4A). These data
provide further evidence that the E-box element is an essential DNA
cis-element for the trans-activation of PGS-2
gene promoter constructs in differentiated granulosa cells.
Fig. 4.
Role of the CAAT box and the E-box DNA
binding elements in the trans-activation of the rat PGS-2
gene. A, mutations within the CAAT box and the E-box sites
(as indicated by lower case letters) were generated with the polymerase
chain reaction and oligonucleotides containing mutations within the
CAAT box or E-box (see Fig. 1). Primary cultures of differentiated
granulosa cells were transiently transfected with the mutated
constructs: C/EBP Mt, E-box Mt, and Double Mt. The cells were then
treated without (gray bars) or with LH (500 ng/ml;
black bars). After 6 h, cells were harvested, lysed,
and the cytosolic fractions were assayed for CAT activity. Data are
expressed as relative activity (mean ± S.E. of three independent
experiments). Fold induction by LH for the pCAT·Basic, 195, C/EBP
Mt, E-box Mt, and the Double Mt PGS-2·CAT vectors was 1.75-, 9-, 9.8-, 8.8-, and 5.1-fold, respectively. B, granulosa cells
transfected with the three mutant constructs were also treated without
(gray bars) or with (hatched bars) GnRH (1 µM) for 6 h before proteins were collected and CAT
activity measured. The data are expressed as relative activity
(mean ± S.E. of three independent experiments). Fold induction by
GnRH for the pCAT·Basic, 195, C/EBP Mt, E-box Mt, and the Double Mt
PGS-2·CAT constructs was 1-, 3.3-, 4-, 3.1-, and 2-fold,
respectively.
Relative CAT activities induced by GnRH in cells transfected with the
195 PGS-2·CAT construct versus the C/EBP Mt were similar
(40 ± 16 versus 50 ± 10; Fig. 4B).
However, transfection of the E-box Mt decreased relative CAT activity
induced by GnRH to 15% of the activity produced by the nonmutated
construct ( 195 PGS-2·CAT). The fold induction by GnRH remained
unchanged for all three constructs. CAT activity in the presence or
absence of GnRH in the Double Mt was similar and not different from
that of the E-box Mt (Fig. 4B). These data further
demonstrate that the E-box is required for basal activity, as well as
hormone induction, of PGS-2 transgenes in granulosa cell cultures.
CREB Does Not Bind the 67/ 41 Region of the Rat PGS-2
Promoter
The mouse PGS-2 promoter 65/ 39 bp oligonucleotide
binds both CREB (36), c-Jun (37), and E-box proteins (36) in
electrophoretic mobility shift assays. This same region is essential
for v-src induction of PGS-2 chimeric genes in NIH 3T3 cells
(37). To determine whether the protein-DNA complexes shifted by the rat
67/ 41 oligonucleotide contained CREB, or other CRE-binding
proteins, nuclear extracts of granulosa cells were incubated with an
end-labeled rat 67/ 41 oligonucleotide (Fig.
5A) in the presence or absence of unlabeled
consensus CRE oligonucleotide or CREB antibody. The two complexes
binding the rat E-box element were not competed by 100-fold excess of
CRE; nor were they supershifted with the CREB antibody (Fig.
5B). To directly compare the proteins binding to the mouse
and rat CRE/E-box promoter regions, an oligonucleotide corresponding to
the mouse CRE/E-box ( 65/ 39; Fig. 5A) was labeled and
incubated with granulosa cell nuclear extracts. Protein-DNA complexes
in addition to complex I and II were observed and are denoted as
complexes III and IV (Fig. 5C). When an unlabeled CRE
consensus oligonucleotide was incubated with the nuclear extracts and
the mouse oligonucleotide, complexes III and IV, but not I and II, were
decreased (Fig. 5, B and C). The ability of the
CREB antibody to shift CREB protein present in the mouse complex IV
(Fig. 5C (*)) confirmed the ability of CREB to bind mouse
E-box oligonucleotide. CREB was not present in rat or mouse complexes I
and II (Fig. 5, B and C). By these in
vitro DNA binding assays, it is clear that more proteins bind to
this region of the mouse PGS-2 promoter than to the rat promoter, and
that one of the proteins is CREB.
Fig. 5.
CREB does not bind the 67/ 41 region of
the rat PGS-2 promoter. A, rat and mouse PGS-2 promoter
regions containing the E-box DNA element. The E-box is indicated by the
boxed in area; the ATF/CRE region is underlined. B, the rat
PGS-2 oligonucleotide was incubated with nuclear extracts (HEF + hCG)
(2 h) in the absence or presence of either a 100-fold molar excess of
unlabeled CRE consensus oligonucleotide (Promega) or with a 1:20
dilution of antibody to CREB. Neither the CRE nor CREB antibody altered
the formation of the protein-DNA complexes I and II
(arrows). C, when the mouse PGS-2 oligonucleotide
was incubated with the same nuclear extract, complexes I and II as well
as complexes III and IV were formed. Complexes III and IV, but not I
and II, were decreased in the presence of the unlabled CRE. Complex IV
was supershifted (*) in the presence of CREB antibody (1:20). Thus,
CREB and other protein CRE-binding proteins interact with the mouse,
and not the rat, PGS-2 promoter.
USF Binds to the E-box Region of the PGS-2 Promoter
Several
class B E-box binding proteins have been identified and shown to bind
the CACGTG consensus site (50). These include USF which binds to this
region when a thymidine (T) residue precedes the consensus region
(TCACGTG) (50). To determine if USF was present in the E-box
DNA-protein complexes, USF antibody was added to the binding reactions
at increasing concentrations (dilutions of 1:2000, 1:200, and 1:20).
Each dilution of the antiserum generated a supershifted complex, which
was not observed in the presence of preimmune serum (Fig.
6A). The increasing amount of antibody in the
binding reaction reduced the amount of protein/DNA present in both
complex I and II suggesting that both protein-DNA complexes contain the
transcription factor USF.
Fig. 6.
The transcription factor, USF, binds to the
E-box region of the rat PGS-2 promoter. A, EMSAs with a
32P-labeled rat PGS-2 67/ 41 oligonucleotide formed two
protein-DNA complexes I and II in the presence of nuclear extract (HEF + hCG (2 h); lane 2), but not in the absence of nuclear
extracts (lane 1). When reactions included a 1:20 dilution
of preimmune serum (lane 3), complexes I or II remained
unchanged; incubation with increasing amounts of polyclonal antibody to
the transcription factor, USF (1:2000, 1:200, and 1:20) supershifted
(*) both complexes I and II (lanes 4-6). Thus, USF protein
is present in both protein complexes (I and II) that bind the 67/ 41
oligonucleotide. B, differentiated granulosa cell extracts
were exposed to an ovulatory dose of hCG (500 ng/ml). After 0, 2, 7, 12, or 24 h, the cells were lysed and whole cell extracts were
prepared. The whole cell lysates (50 µg) were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to
nitrocellulose. The membranes were incubated with USF antibody at
1:5000 dilution in 2% milk, 1 × PBS. The blots were then
incubated with anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to horse radish peroxidase
(1:10,000) and visualized with ECL. The USF protein (43/44 kDa;
arrow) is expressed in differentiated granulosa cells
throughout a 24-h incubation with hCG.
This study has demonstrated that USF protein binds to the E-box in the
rat PGS-2 promoter (Fig. 6A) and that this binding does not
vary during follicular development (Fig. 3B). To determine
if the USF protein is induced by LH in association with induction of
the PGS-2 gene, differentiated granulosa cells were induced with hCG
(500 ng/ml) for 2, 7, 12, and 24 h. Whole cell protein extracts
collected prior to incubation with hCG (500 ng/ml) and after each time
point were analyzed by immunoblot analysis. The amount of USF protein
present in whole cell extracts of granulosa cells did not change after
incubation with hCG (Fig. 6B). The doublet present on the
immunoblot suggests that both the 43- and 44-kDa isoforms of USF are
present in the granulosa cell lysates.
Promoters of Several Ovarian Genes Contain an E-box DNA
cis-Element
Other genes which are involved in ovarian function
contain a similar E-box consensus site in their 5 -flanking regions
(Table I). The promoter of the RII gene (regulatory
subunit of protein kinase A) contains an E-box that binds both USF and
c-myc present in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) fibroblasts and
mouse Nb2a neuroblastoma cell extracts (51). The gene encoding Ad4bp
(adrenal 4 binding protein), also known as SF-1, requires an E-box for
transcriptional activation of fusion constructs transfected into Y-1
adrenocortical cells and MA-10 testicular Leydig cells (52). Finally,
the promoter of the FSH-receptor gene also has a consensus E-box (53)
that is important for regulation of the FSH-receptor promoter fusion
constructs in rat Sertoli cells (54).
To determine if the E-box elements present in the promoters bound
similar proteins as the rat PGS-2 E-box, oligonucleotides corresponding
to E-boxes of the human and rat PGS-2, as well as rat SF-1, rat FSH-R,
and mouse RII genes were synthesized, end-labeled and incubated with
granulosa cell nuclear extracts. The labeled rat PGS-2 E-box
oligonucleotide ( 67/ 41) formed two protein-DNA complexes (I and II)
in the presence of nuclear extract as previously discussed (Fig.
7, panel A, lane 1). Complexes I
and II were decreased in the presence of unlabeled competitor DNA
corresponding to the rat PGS-2, RII , and FSH-receptor E-box regions,
but not to a CRE oligonucleotide (Fig. 7, panel A,
lanes 2-5). In addition, both complexes were shifted in the
presence of USF antibody (1:2000; Fig. 7, panel A,
lane 6).
Fig. 7.
Promoters of several genes expressed in the
ovary contain E-box elements that bind USF. Oligonucleotides
containing E-box elements of several promoters were synthesized:
A, rat PGS-2; B, human PGS-2; C, SF-1,
D, RII ; and E, FSH receptor. The ability of
each of these promoter sequences to bind proteins present in granulosa
cell nuclear extracts was compared by EMSAs using labeled
oligonucleotides as indicated in the presence of unlabeled competitor
DNA (100-fold) or USF-antibody (1:2000) as indicated. See text for
discussion.
The labeled human PGS-2 oligonucleotide formed several protein-DNA
complexes when incubated with rat granulosa cell nuclear extract (Fig.
7, panel B, lane 7). These complexes were
specifically competed by competitor human PGS-2 E-box DNA, but not with
either rPGS-2 or RII E-box competitor DNA (Fig. 7, panel
B, lanes 8-10). Consensus CRE competitor DNA prevented
formation of all, but two protein-DNA complexes (Fig. 7, panel
B, lane 11). None of the complexes was shifted in the
presence of the USF antibody (Fig. 7, panel B, lane
12).
Labeled SF-1 E-box oligonucleotide formed two protein-DNA complexes
which were decreased in the presence of SF-1 and rPGS-2 E-box
competitor DNA (Fig. 7, panel C, lanes 1-4).
These protein-DNA complexes were shifted in the presence of the USF
antibody (Fig. 7, panel C, lane 5).
Labeled mouse RII oligonucleotide formed two complexes similar to
complexes I and II of the rPGS-2 E-box oligonucleotide (Fig. 7,
panel D, lane 1). These complexes were decreased
in the presence of RII , FSH-R, and rPGS-2 competitor DNA, but not in
the presence of a CRE oligonucleotide (Fig. 7, panel D,
lanes 2-5). The complexes were shifted in the presence of a
USF antibody (Fig. 7, panel D, lane 6). An
additional protein-DNA complex is also present, but is not specifically
competed by the unlabeled competitor DNA (Fig. 7, panel D,
lanes 2-4).
Labeled FSH-receptor DNA formed two complexes similar to complexes I
and II formed by the rat PGS-2, as well as the SF-1, E-box
oligonucleotides (Fig. 7, panel E, lane 7).
Formation of these complexes was prevented by competitor FSH-R, RII ,
and rPGS-2 E-box DNA, but not the consensus CRE oligonucleotide (Fig.
7, panel E, lanes 8-11). In addition, both
complex I and II were shifted in the presence of the USF antibody (Fig.
7, panel E, lane 12).
In summary, promoters for rat PGS-2, mouse PGS-2, RII , FSH-R, and
SF-1, but not human PGS-2 promoters, contain an E-box region capable of
binding the USF protein present in granulosa cell nuclear extracts. The
mouse PGS-2 and human PGS-2 promoters also contain a consensus CRE
adjacent to the E-box, which binds the CREB protein (33, 36).
DISCUSSION
The specific molecular events controlling the expression of the
PGS-2 gene in the ovary are dependent not only on the activation of
specific signaling pathways, but also on the stage of follicular
development and granulosa cell differentiation (55). Induction of PGS-2
mRNA and protein by protein kinase A (LH) and protein kinase C
(GnRH) pathways occurs only in granulosa cells that have differentiated
to a preovulatory phenotype (14, 24, 25, 26). This study documents that
transcriptional regulation by LH and GnRH of rat PGS-2 promoter
transgenes in rat ovarian granulosa cells is dependent on the integrity
of a cis-acting E-box element located in the proximal
promoter. Disruption of this E-box by a 5 deletion to 52 bp, a point
mutation that deletes the C nucleotide at position 52, or mutation of
the consensus E-box sequence from CACGTG to CACtTt within the context
of the 192 bp of the promoter caused marked decreases in the
transcriptional activity of chimeric genes transfected into cultured
rat granulosa cells. Mutations of a functional C/EBP consensus binding
site ( 140/ 132) (38) within the context of the promoter did not
abolish basal or hormonal regulation of the transgenes, indicating that
the E-box region interacts with other cis-acting DNA
elements located proximal to the CAAT box. Electrophoretic mobility
shift assays documented that the transcription factor USF is present in
granulosa cell nuclear extracts and binds to an E-box region of the rat
PGS-2 promoter. No additional protein-DNA complexes were observed
within this region indicating that USF is the primary transcription
factor in granulosa cells that binds the E-box region of the rat PGS-2
promoter.
By comparing the binding activities of the rat, mouse, and human PGS-2
E-box regions using rat granulosa cell nuclear extracts, we have shown
that the rat E-box region forms two complexes both of which contain
USF. The E-box region of the mouse PGS-2 gene also binds USF, but in
addition binds CREB and c-Jun (36, 37). Despite the ability of the
mouse PGS-2 promoter to bind each of these factors, c-Jun is the
transcription factor in NIH-3T3 cells that is able to mediate
v-src trans-activation of mouse PGS-2 transgenes in the
absence of a functional E-box (37). A deletion mutant of the human
PGS-2 promoter ( 52/59) that disrupts the putative human E-box region
also abolishes functional activity of chimeric transgenes genes.
However, it is not yet known if the human PGS-2 E-box has functional
importance for activity in any of the cell types tested or in
conjunction with other regions (NF- B, C/EBP, CRE) reported to confer
functional activity (33, 34). In addition, it is not yet known which
(if any) E-box proteins bind the putative E-box region of the human
PGS-2 promoter. Although the human E-box (CAC TG) differs
from the rat and mouse (CAC TG) and does not bind USF, this
sequence has been shown to bind other E-box proteins (50).
Although differences in PGS-2 promoter sequences between species may
determine tissue-specific expression of the gene, the observed
differences in the PGS-2 E-box regions of rat, mouse, and human do not
appear to have major effects on the induction of PGS-2 in granulosa
cells of preovulatory follicles. PGS-2 is induced by LH in rat (14, 24,
25), mouse (data not shown), bovine (56), and presumably human
preovulatory granulosa cells. Furthermore, a mouse PGS-2 luciferase
construct containing 371 bp of promoter sequence (36) is activated by
LH when transfected into cultured rat granulosa cells (data not shown).
Thus, the PGS-2 E-box of each species is likely to be functionally
important in granulosa cells with the CRE/ATF binding sites providing
additional regulation of activity in the mouse and human genes. Because
the PGS-2 gene is usually repressed except in specific cell types and
some transformed cell lines, there must also be factors that silence
the promoter either by effecting the binding of USF or other regulatory
factors.
Although USF was the only protein in granulosa cell extracts that bound
to the rat PGS-2 E-box region in detectable amounts, it is unlikely to
be the sole factor controlling PGS-2 expression in granulosa cells in
response to agonist induction. USF protein levels and DNA binding
activities were similar in small antral, preovulatory, and ovulatory
granulosa cells exposed to hCG. This is not surprising since USF is
ubiquitously expressed in all tissues (57). Therefore, changes in USF
activity might be regulated by phosphorylation or by the interaction of
USF with other components of the transcriptional machinery that are
regulated or modified by the actions of LH and GnRH. Because no
consensus phosphorylation sites have been found in the domains of the
USF protein required for activation of transcription and because the
putative USF protein activation domains are themselves not acidic
activation domains, the mechanism of trans-activation by USF
remains unclear (58). It appears likely that additional
cis-acting factors and unknown co-activators may be involved
in the hormonal regulation of the PGS-2 promoter in the rat ovary.
Co-activators of USF have been identified in other tissues (59) and in
the regulation of viral genes (60), however, the putative
co-activator(s) of USF in ovarian cells remain to be determined.
The regulatory role of E-box regions is intriguing because several
other genes expressed in ovarian granulosa cells have been shown to
contain functional E-box sequences. These include genes that are
developmentally regulated at an early stage of ovarian cell
differentiation, such as SF-1 (52, 60, 61, 62) and the FSH receptor (63,
64), as well as genes that are hormonally regulated at later stages of
granulosa cell differentiation, such as RII (43, 65) and PGS-2 (15,
27, 38). As shown herein, the E-box of each of these genes binds USF
present in rat granulosa extracts. The different patterns of expression
of these genes during follicular development and in other selected
tissues indicate that E-box regions exhibit different functional
activities by interacting with different upstream regulatory regions
and trans-acting factors in a cell specific manner. For
example, although the E-box region of the mouse PGS-2 gene binds more
proteins in fibroblasts than in granulosa cells, the E-box region of
the mouse PGS-2 gene appeared less important for the expression of
PGS-2 transgenes in NIH 3T3 cells stimulated by v-src (36),
than the E-box region of the rat PGS-2 genes expressed in rat granulosa
cells stimulated by either LH or GnRH. Likewise, a region containing
the E-box of the RII gene is important for cAMP regulation in rat
granulosa cells (43) and binds USF. Although the mouse RII E-box
binds more proteins in CHO extracts than in granulosa cell extracts,
the magnitude of the effect of the E-box mutations in the RII
transgenes expressed in CHO and Nb2a cells (51) was far less than that
observed for E-box mutants of SF-1 transgenes expressed in
steroidogenic tissues (52) and E-box mutants of PGS-2 transgenes
expressed in granulosa cells. Last, despite the presence of E-box
proteins in CV-1 cells, SF-1 mRNA is not expresssed in these cells;
nor did these cells express SF-1 transgenes (52). Taken together, these
observations indicate that the functional potency of the E-box regions
of these genes is greater in steroidogenic cells than in fibroblasts
and that the differences in potency likely depend on the relative
amount and type of E-box binding proteins, as well as specific regions
of the promoters and the cell specific factors binding to these
regions. Thus, if USF is ubiquitous and constitutively expressed in
granulosa cells, other factors must contribute to the developmental and
hormone-induced expression of the PGS-2, RII , SF-1, and FSH receptor
genes at specific stages of granulosa cell differentiation by
agonists.
The complexity of the regulation of the PGS-2 gene in multiple tissues
is further underscored by the presence of other regions that confer
activity in a cell specific manner. Previous studies in our laboratory
(38) as well as those of others (33, 34, 35) have indicated that the
consensus CAAT site binds C/EBPs and in certain conditions can confer
agonist trans-activation of the PGS-2 gene. However, in the
present study, when the CAAT site was mutated within the context of the
intact promoter, no decrease in basal or agonist stimulated CAT
activity was observed. Thus, although the CAAT box is capable of
conferring agonist induction to the PGS-2 gene in the absence of the
E-box cis-element, this may be due to the ability of
C/EBP and C/EBP to interact with the other components of the
transcriptional machinery, whereas in the presence of USF, this
interaction either does not occur, is not required or based on results
with the human PGS-2 promoter, is altered to exert an inhibitory
effect. Specifically, the activity of the human PGS-2 promoter in
bovine arterial endothelial cells and of the mouse promoter in the
osteoblastic cell line, MC3T3-E1, are highly responsive to the C/EBP
site in an isoform specific manner (34, 35). C/EBP , and not C/EBP
and C/EBP , is induced in bovine arterial endothelial cells by
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-3-acetate and lipopolysaccharide.
Moreover, when a C/EBP expression vector was cotransfected with a
human PGS-2 reporter construct into bovine arterial endothelial cells
containing 327 bp of 5 -flanking sequence (including C/EBP, CRE, and
putative E-box sequences), luciferase activity was markedly increased.
Co-transfection with C/EBP and C/EBP vectors decreased the
response (34). In granulosa cells, C/EBP , rather than C/EBP ,
mRNA, and protein are induced in response to LH, whereas C/EBP
is decreased (38). Therefore, C/EBP or C/EBP may be candidates
for factors that mediate the rapid decrease in
trans-activation of the rat PGS-2 gene in response to the
ovulatory LH surge.
In summary, transcriptional regulation of the PGS-2 gene is
multifaceted. The trans-acting factors and
cis-acting DNA elements that mediate
trans-activation of the endogenous PGS-2 gene and chimeric
PGS-2 transgenes appear to be dependent on the cell type, the agonists
used to stimulate cellular signaling pathways and the species specific
promoter elements. In this study we have shown that the integrity of
the E-box region of the rat PGS-2 gene is required for expression in
granulosa cells and appears to interact with upstream
cis-acting elements other than the CAAT box to confer
hormonal regulation of this gene in rat granulosa cells. The E-box
region of the rat PGS-2 promoter binds USF (as do E-box regions of
other genes regulated in the ovary), but does not contain ATF/CRE
activity found in the human and mouse PGS-2 promoters.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant HD-16229 and the Reproductive Biology: Regulatory Mechanisms
Training Grant HD-07165. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence and requests for reprints should be
addressed: Dept. of Cell Biology, One Baylor Plaza, Baylor College of
Medicine, Houston, TX 77030. Tel.: 713-798-6259; Fax: 713-790-1275;
E-mail: joanner{at}bcm.tmc.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: PGS, prostaglandin
endoperoxide synthase; LH, luteinizing hormone; GnRH,
gonadotropin-releasing hormone; FSH, follicle-stimulating hormone;
FSH-R, follicle-stimulating hormone-receptor; USF, upstream stimulatory
factor; bp, base pair(s); C/EBP, CAAT/enhancer binding protein; ATF,
activating transcription factor; CRE, cAMP response element; CREB, cAMP
response element binding protein; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; hCG,
human chorionic gonadotropin; SF-1, steroidogenic factor-1; RII ,
type II regulatory subunit of protein kinase A; FSH,
follicle-stimulating hormone; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift
assay; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; Mt, mutant; CHO, Chinese hamster
ovary; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; rPGS-2, rat PGS-2.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Michelle Sawadogo, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, for providing USF antibody and Dr.
Marc Montminy, Salk Institute, La Jolla, CA, for providing the CREB
antibody. We also thank Dr. Ming Jer-Tsai for critically reading the
manuscript.
REFERENCES
-
Smith, W. L.,
Marnett, L. J.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1083,
1-17
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
DeWitt, D. L.
(1991)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1083,
121-134
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Espey, L. L.
(1980)
Biol. Reprod.
22,
73-106
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Espey, L. L.,
Lipner, H.
(1994)
The Physiology of Reproduction
(Knobil, E.,
Neill, J. D.,
eds)
, 2nd Ed.
, p. 725, Raven Press, New York
-
Lau, I. F.,
Saksena, S. K.,
Chang, M. C.
(1974)
J. Reprod. Fertil.
40,
467-469
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Armstrong, D. T.,
Grinwich, D. L.
(1972)
Prostaglandins
1,
21-28
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Orczyk, G. P.,
Behrman, H. R.
(1972)
Prostaglandins
1,
3-20
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tsafriri, A.,
Lindner, H. R.,
Zor, U.,
Lamprecht, S. A.
(1972)
Prostaglandins
2,
1-10
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Espey, L. L.
(1982)
Prostaglandins
23,
329-335
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
O'Grady, J. P.,
Caldwell, B. V.,
Auletta, F. J.,
Speroff, L.
(1972)
Prostaglandins
2,
1-10
-
Ainsworth, L.,
Tsang, B. K.,
Downey, B. R.,
Baker, R. D.,
Marcus, G.
J.,
Armstrong, D. T.
(1979)
Biol. Reprod.
21,
401-411
[Abstract]
-
Dinchuk, J. E.,
Car, B. D.,
Focht, R. J.,
Johnston, J. J.,
Jaffee, B.
D.,
Covington, M. B.,
Contel, N. R.,
Eng, V. M.,
Collins, R. J.,
Czerniak, P. M.,
Gorry, S. A.,
Trzaskos, J. M.
(1995)
Nature
378,
406-409
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Langenbach, R.,
Morham, S. G.,
Tiano, H. F.,
Loftin, C. D.,
Ghanayem, B. I.,
Chulada, P. C.,
Mahler, J. F.,
Lee, C. A.,
Goulding, E. H.,
Kluckman, K. D.,
Kim, H. S.,
Smithies, O.
(1995)
Cell
83,
483-492
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wong, W. Y. L.,
Richards, J. S.
(1991)
Mol. Endocrinol.
5,
1269-1279
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sirois, J.,
Richards, J. S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
6382-6388
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
DeWitt, D. L.,
Smith, W. L.
(1988)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
85,
1412-1416
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Merlie, J. P.,
Fagan, D.,
Mudd, J.,
Needleman, P.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
3550-3553
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yokayama, C.,
Takai, T.,
Tanabe, T.
(1988)
FEBS Lett.
231,
347-351
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Xie, W.,
Chipman, J. G.,
Robertson, D. L.,
Erickson, R. L.,
Simmons, D. L.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
2692-2696
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rosen, G. D.,
Birkenmeier, T. M.,
Ras, A.,
Holtzman, M. J.
(1989)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
164,
1358-1365
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kujubu, D. A.,
Reddy, S. T.,
Fletcher, B. S.,
Herschman, H. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5425-5430
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Herschman, H. R.
(1994)
Cancer Metastasis Rev.
13,
241-256
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wong, W. Y. L.,
Richards, J. S.
(1992)
Endocrinology
130,
3512-3521
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hedin, L.,
Gaddy-Kurten, D.,
Kurten, R.,
DeWitt, D. L.,
Smith, W. L.,
Richards, J. S.
(1987)
Endocrinology
121,
722-731
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sirois, J.,
Simmons, D. L.,
Richards, J. S.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
11586-11592
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Morris, J. K.,
Richards, J. S.
(1993)
Endocrinology
133,
770-779
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Morris, J. K.,
Richards, J. S.
(1995)
Endocrinology
136,
1549-1558
[Abstract]
-
Fletcher, B. S.,
Kujubu, D. A.,
Perrin, D. M.,
Herschman, H. R.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
4338-4344
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kraemer, S. A.,
Meade, E. A.,
DeWitt, D. L.
(1992)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
293,
391-400
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Xie, W.,
Merrill, J. R.,
Bradshaw, W. S.,
Simmons, D. L.
(1993)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
300,
247-252
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sirois, J.,
Levy, L.,
Simmons, D. L.,
Richards, J. S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
12199-12206
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kosaka, T.,
Miyata, A.,
Ihara, H.,
Hara, S.,
Sugimoto, T.,
Takeda, O.,
Eakahashi, E.,
Tanabe, T.
(1994)
Eur. J. Biochem.
221,
889-897
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Inoue, H.,
Nanayama, T.,
Hara, S.,
Yokoyama, C.,
Tanabe, T.
(1994)
FEBS Lett.
350,
51-54
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Inoue, H.,
Yokoyama, C.,
Hara, S.,
Tone, Y.,
Tanabe, T.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24965-24971
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yamamoto, K.,
Arakawa, T.,
Ueda, N.,
Yamamoto, S.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
31315-31320
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Xie, W.,
Fletcher, B. S.,
Andersen, R. D.,
Herschman, H. R.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6531-6539
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Xie, W.,
Herschman, H. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
27622-27628
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sirois, J.,
Richards, J. S.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
21931-21938
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ratoosh, S. L.,
Richards, J. S.
(1985)
Endocrinology
117,
917-927
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fitzpatrick, S. L.,
Richards, J. S.
(1991)
Endocrinology
129,
1452-1462
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Natraj, U.,
Richards, J. S.
(1993)
Endocrinology
133,
761-769
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sambrook, J.,
Fritsch, E. F.,
Maniatis, T.
(1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual
, 2nd Ed.
, Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Kurten, R. C.,
Levy, L.,
Shey, J.,
Durica, J. M.,
Richards, J.
S.
(1992)
Mol. Endocrinol.
6,
536-550
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gorman, C. M.,
Moffat, L. F.,
Howard, B. H.
(1982)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
2,
1044-1051
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Welte, T.,
Garimorth, K.,
Philipp, S.,
Doppler, W.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
1091-1102
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fitzpatrick, S. L.,
Richards, J. S.
(1993)
Mol. Endocrinol.
7,
341-354
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Garner, M. M.,
Revzin, A.
(1981)
Nucleic Acids Res.
9,
3047-3060
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Higuchi, R.,
Innis, M. A.,
Gelfand, D. H.,
Sninsky, J. J.,
White, T. J.
(eds)
(1990)
PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications
, p. 177, Academic Press, San Diego, CA
-
Ausubel, F. M.,
Brent, R.,
Kingston, R. E.,
Moore, D. D.,
Seidman, J.
G.,
Smith, J. A.,
Struhl, K.
(eds)
(1987)
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology
, p. 12.2.1, John Wiley & Sons, New
York
-
Bendall, A. J.,
Molloy, P. L.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
2801-2810
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Singh, I. S.,
Luo, Z.,
Kozlowski, M. T.,
Erlichman, J.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
1163-1174
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nomura, M.,
Bärtsch, S.,
Nawata, H.,
Omura, T.,
Morohashi, K.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7453-7461
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Heckert, L. L.,
Daley, I. J.,
Griswold, M. D.
(1992)
Mol. Endocrinol.
6,
70-80
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Goetz, T. L., and Griswold, M. D. (1995) Biol. Reprod.
50, Suppl. 1, 98
-
Richards, J. S.
(1994)
Endocr. Rev.
15,
725-751
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sirois, J.
(1994)
Endocrinology
135,
841-848
[Abstract]
-
Sirito, M.,
Lin, Q.,
Maity, T.,
Sawadogo, M.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
427-433
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kirschaum, B. J.,
Pognonec, P.,
Roeder, R. G.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
5094-5101
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zawel, L.,
Reinberg, D.
(1993)
Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol.
44,
67-108
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Meier, J. L.,
Xu, L.,
Sawadogo, M.,
Straus, S. E.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
6896-6906
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lala, D. S.,
Rice, D. A.,
Parker, K. L.
(1992)
Mol. Endocrinol.
6,
1249-1258
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ikeda, Y.,
Shen, W.-H.,
Ingraham, H.,
Parker, K. L.
(1994)
Mol. Endocrinol.
8,
654-662
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Richards, J. S.
(1980)
Physiol. Rev.
60,
51-89
[Free Full Text]
-
Tilly, J. L.,
LaPolt, P. S.,
Hsueh, A. J.
(1992)
Endocrinology
130,
1296-1302
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jahnsen, T.,
Hedin, L.,
Kidd, V. J.,
Beattie, W. G.,
Lohmann, S. M.,
Walter, U.,
Durica, J.,
Schulz, T. Z.,
Schiltz, E.,
Browner, M.,
Lawrence, C. B.,
Goldman, D.,
Ratoosh, S. L.,
Richards, J. S.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
12352-12361
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Liu, E.-S. Park, and M. Jo
Runt-Related Transcription Factor 1 Regulates Luteinized Hormone-Induced Prostaglandin-Endoperoxide Synthase 2 Expression in Rat Periovulatory Granulosa Cells
Endocrinology,
July 1, 2009;
150(7):
3291 - 3300.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. L. Johnson, M. J. Haugen, and D. C. Woods
Role for Inhibitor of Differentiation/Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Binding (Id) Proteins in Granulosa Cell Differentiation
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2008;
149(6):
3187 - 3195.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. L. Russell and R. L. Robker
Molecular mechanisms of ovulation: co-ordination through the cumulus complex
Hum. Reprod. Update,
May 1, 2007;
13(3):
289 - 312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Shimada, I. Hernandez-Gonzalez, I. Gonzalez-Robayna, and J. S. Richards
Paracrine and Autocrine Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor-Like Factors in Cumulus Oocyte Complexes and Granulosa Cells: Key Roles for Prostaglandin Synthase 2 and Progesterone Receptor
Mol. Endocrinol.,
June 1, 2006;
20(6):
1352 - 1365.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sayasith, J. G. Lussier, and J. Sirois
Role of Upstream Stimulatory Factor Phosphorylation in the Regulation of the Prostaglandin G/H Synthase-2 Promoter in Granulosa Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 12, 2005;
280(32):
28885 - 28893.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Joo, Y. S. Hahn, M. Kwon, R. T. Sadikot, T. S. Blackwell, and J. W. Christman
Hepatitis C Virus Core Protein Suppresses NF-{kappa}B Activation and Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression by Direct Interaction with I{kappa}B Kinase {beta}
J. Virol.,
June 15, 2005;
79(12):
7648 - 7657.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Gillio-Meina, Y. Y. Hui, and H. A. LaVoie
Expression of CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Proteins Alpha and Beta in the Porcine Ovary and Regulation in Primary Cultures of Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod,
May 1, 2005;
72(5):
1194 - 1204.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
V. Vila-del Sol and M. Fresno
Involvement of TNF and NF-{kappa}B in the Transcriptional Control of Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression by IFN-{gamma} in Macrophages
J. Immunol.,
March 1, 2005;
174(5):
2825 - 2833.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Pathak, A. Bhattacharyya, S. Pathak, C. Basak, D. Mandal, M. Kundu, and J. Basu
Toll-like Receptor 2 and Mitogen- and Stress-activated Kinase 1 Are Effectors of Mycobacterium avium-induced Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Macrophages
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 31, 2004;
279(53):
55127 - 55136.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Sirois, K. Sayasith, K. A. Brown, A. E. Stock, N. Bouchard, and M. Dore
Cyclooxygenase-2 and its role in ovulation: a 2004 account
Hum. Reprod. Update,
September 1, 2004;
10(5):
373 - 385.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Sayasith, N. Bouchard, M. Sawadogo, J. G. Lussier, and J. Sirois
Molecular Characterization and Role of Bovine Upstream Stimulatory Factor 1 and 2 in the Regulation of the Prostaglandin G/H Synthase-2 Promoter in Granulosa Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 20, 2004;
279(8):
6327 - 6336.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Joo, G. Y. Park, J. G. Wright, T. S. Blackwell, M. L. Atchison, and J. W. Christman
Transcriptional Regulation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene in Macrophages by PU.1
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 20, 2004;
279(8):
6658 - 6665.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Yamada, H. Kawata, T. Mizutani, T. Arima, T. Yazawa, K. Matsuura, Z. Shou, T. Sekiguchi, M. Yoshino, T. Kajitani, et al.
Gene Expression of Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factor, SHARP-2, Is Regulated by Gonadotropins in the Rat Ovary and MA-10 Cells
Biol Reprod,
January 1, 2004;
70(1):
76 - 82.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. E. Falender, R. Lanz, D. Malenfant, L. Belanger, and J. S. Richards
Differential Expression of Steroidogenic Factor-1 and FTF/LRH-1 in the Rodent Ovary
Endocrinology,
August 1, 2003;
144(8):
3598 - 3610.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Rao, S. Maiti, H. N. Ananthaswamy, and M. F. Wilkinson
A Highly Active Homeobox Gene Promoter Regulated by Ets and Sp1 Family Members in Normal Granulosa Cells and Diverse Tumor Cell Types
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 12, 2002;
277(29):
26036 - 26045.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Schroer, Y. Zhu, M. A. Saunders, W.-G. Deng, X.-M. Xu, J. Meyer-Kirchrath, and K. K. Wu
Obligatory Role of Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate Response Element in Cyclooxygenase-2 Promoter Induction and Feedback Regulation by Inflammatory Mediators
Circulation,
June 11, 2002;
105(23):
2760 - 2765.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-L. Wu and M. C. Wiltbank
Transcriptional Regulation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene Changes from Protein Kinase (PK) A- to PKC-Dependence after Luteinization of Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod,
May 1, 2002;
66(5):
1505 - 1514.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Calomme, T. L.-A. Nguyen, Y. de Launoit, V. Kiermer, L. Droogmans, A. Burny, and C. Van Lint
Upstream Stimulatory Factors Binding to an E Box Motif in the R Region of the Bovine Leukemia Virus Long Terminal Repeat Stimulates Viral Gene Expression
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 8, 2002;
277(11):
8775 - 8789.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-L. Wu and M. C. Wiltbank
Transcriptional Regulation of Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene in Ovine Large Luteal Cells
Biol Reprod,
November 1, 2001;
65(5):
1565 - 1572.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Takano, A. V. Cybulsky, X. Yang, and L. Aoudjit
Complement C5b-9 induces cyclooxygenase-2 gene transcription in glomerular epithelial cells
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
November 1, 2001;
281(5):
F841 - F850.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Zeng and A. R. Morrison
Disruption of the actin cytoskeleton regulates cytokine-induced iNOS expression
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
September 1, 2001;
281(3):
C932 - C940.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. SUGIMOTO, M. HANEDA, H. SAWANO, K. ISSHIKI, S. MAEDA, D. KOYA, K. INOKI, H. YASUDA, A. KASHIWAGI, and R. KIKKAWA
Endothelin-1 Induces Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression Via Nuclear Factor of Activated T-Cell Transcription Factor in Glomerular Mesangial Cells
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
July 1, 2001;
12(7):
1359 - 1368.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Richards
Perspective: The Ovarian Follicle--A Perspective in 2001
Endocrinology,
June 1, 2001;
142(6):
2184 - 2193.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Yamada, T. Mizutani, Z. Shou, T. Yazawa, T. Sekiguchi, M. Yoshino, T. Inazu, and K. Miyamoto
Cloning and Functional Expression of an E Box-Binding Protein from Rat Granulosa Cells
Biol Reprod,
May 1, 2001;
64(5):
1315 - 1319.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Liu, M. Antaya, A. K. Goff, D. Boerboom, D. W. Silversides, J. G. Lussier, and J. Sirois
Molecular Characterization of Bovine Prostaglandin G/H Synthase-2 and Regulation in Uterine Stromal Cells
Biol Reprod,
March 1, 2001;
64(3):
983 - 991.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Richards
New Signaling Pathways for Hormones and Cyclic Adenosine 3',5'-Monophosphate Action in Endocrine Cells
Mol. Endocrinol.,
February 1, 2001;
15(2):
209 - 218.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Vogel, A.-M. J.F. Boerboom, C. Baechle, C. El-Bahay, R. Kahl, G. H. Degen, and J. Abel
Regulation of prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase-2 induction by dioxin in rat hepatocytes: possible c-Src-mediated pathway
Carcinogenesis,
December 1, 2000;
21(12):
2267 - 2274.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. E. Lipsky, P. Brooks, L. J. Crofford, R. DuBois, D. Graham, L. S. Simon, L. B. A. van de Putte, and S. B. Abramson
Unresolved Issues in the Role of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Normal Physiologic Processes and Disease
Arch Intern Med,
April 10, 2000;
160(7):
913 - 920.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A.F. Daggett, D. A. Rice, and L. L. Heckert
Expression of Steroidogenic Factor 1 in the Testis Requires an E Box and CCAAT Box in its Promoter Proximal Region
Biol Reprod,
March 1, 2000;
62(3):
670 - 679.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. J. Wadleigh, S. T. Reddy, E. Kopp, S. Ghosh, and H. R. Herschman
Transcriptional Activation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene in Endotoxin-treated RAW 264.7 Macrophages
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 25, 2000;
275(9):
6259 - 6266.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. T. Reddy, D. J. Wadleigh, and H. R. Herschman
Transcriptional Regulation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene in Activated Mast Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 4, 2000;
275(5):
3107 - 3113.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Liu, M. Antaya, D. Boerboom, J. G. Lussier, D. W. Silversides, and J. Sirois
The Delayed Activation of the Prostaglandin G/H Synthase-2 Promoter in Bovine Granulosa Cells Is Associated with Down-regulation of Truncated Upstream Stimulatory Factor-2
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 3, 1999;
274(49):
35037 - 35045.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Ji, Y. Chen, M. Centrella, and T. L. McCarthy
Activation of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-5 Promoter in Osteoblasts by Cooperative E Box, CCAAT Enhancer-Binding Protein, and Nuclear Factor-1 Deoxyribonucleic Acid-Binding Sequences
Endocrinology,
October 1, 1999;
140(10):
4564 - 4572.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. W. Slice, J. H. Walsh, and E. Rozengurt
Galpha 13 Stimulates Rho-dependent Activation of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Promoter
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 24, 1999;
274(39):
27562 - 27566.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Callejas, M Casado, L Bosca, and P Martin-Sanz
Requirement of nuclear factor kappaB for the constitutive expression of nitric oxide synthase-2 and cyclooxygenase-2 in rat trophoblasts
J. Cell Sci.,
January 9, 1999;
112(18):
3147 - 3155.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Li and B. Seetharam
A 69-Base Pair Fragment Derived from Human Transcobalamin II Promoter Is Sufficient for High Bidirectional Activity in the Absence of a TATA Box and an Initiator Element in Transfected Cells. ROLE OF AN E BOX IN TRANSCRIPTIONAL ACTIVITY
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 23, 1998;
273(43):
28170 - 28177.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Kim and S. M. Fischer
Transcriptional Regulation of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Mouse Skin Carcinoma Cells. REGULATORY ROLE OF CCAAT/ENHANCER-BINDING PROTEINS IN THE DIFFERENTIAL EXPRESSION OF CYCLOOXYGENASE-2 IN NORMAL AND NEOPLASTIC TISSUES
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 16, 1998;
273(42):
27686 - 27694.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. N. Dubois, S. B. Abramson, L. Crofford, R. A. Gupta, L. S. Simon, L. B. A. van de putte, and P. E. Lipsky
Cyclooxygenase in biology and disease
FASEB J,
September 1, 1998;
12(12):
1063 - 1073.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Dumonteil, B. Laser, I. Constant, and J. Philippe
Differential Regulation of the Glucagon and Insulin I Gene Promoters by the Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors E47 and BETA2
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 7, 1998;
273(32):
19945 - 19954.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Richards
Editorial: Sounding the Alarm--Does Induction of Prostaglandin Endoperoxide Synthase-2 Control the Mammalian Ovulatory Clock?
Endocrinology,
October 1, 1997;
138(10):
4047 - 4048.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Sterneck, L. Tessarollo, and P. F. Johnson
An essential role for C/EBPbeta in female reproduction
Genes & Dev.,
September 1, 1997;
11(17):
2153 - 2162.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. G. Woodson, P. A. Crawford, Y. Sadovsky, and J. Milbrandt
Characterization of the Promoter of SF-1, an Orphan Nuclear Receptor Required for Adrenal and Gonadal Development
Mol. Endocrinol.,
February 1, 1997;
11(2):
117 - 126.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. L. Smith, R. M. Garavito, and D. L. DeWitt
Prostaglandin Endoperoxide H Synthases (Cyclooxygenases)-1 and -2
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 27, 1996;
271(52):
33157 - 33160.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Xie and H. R. Herschman
Transcriptional Regulation of Prostaglandin Synthase 2Gene Expression by Platelet-derived Growth Factor and Serum
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 6, 1996;
271(49):
31742 - 31748.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Arakawa, O. Laneuville, C. A. Miller, K. M. Lakkides, B. A. Wingerd, D. L. DeWitt, and W. L. Smith
Prostanoid Receptors of Murine NIH 3T3 and RAW 264.7Cells. STRUCTURE AND EXPRESSION OF THE MURINE PROSTAGLANDIN EP4 RECEPTOR GENE
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 22, 1996;
271(47):
29569 - 29575.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. A. Iniguez, S. Martinez-Martinez, C. Punzon, J. M. Redondo, and M. Fresno
An Essential Role of the Nuclear Factor of Activated T Cells in the Regulation of the Expression of the Cyclooxygenase-2 Gene in Human T Lymphocytes
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 28, 2000;
275(31):
23627 - 23635.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Xu, A. M. Robida, and T. J. Murphy
Immediate-early MEK-1-dependent Stabilization of Rat Smooth Muscle Cell Cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA by Galpha q-coupled Receptor Signaling
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 21, 2000;
275(30):
23012 - 23019.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. J. Cok and A. R. Morrison
The 3'-Untranslated Region of Murine Cyclooxygenase-2 Contains Multiple Regulatory Elements That Alter Message Stability and Translational Efficiency
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 15, 2001;
276(25):
23179 - 23185.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-S. Guo, M. R. Hellmich, X. D. Wen, and C. M. Townsend Jr.
Activator Protein-1 Transcription Factor Mediates Bombesin-stimulated Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Intestinal Epithelial Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 15, 2001;
276(25):
22941 - 22947.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. Gorgoni, M. Caivano, C. Arizmendi, and V. Poli
The Transcription Factor C/EBPbeta Is Essential for Inducible Expression of the cox-2 Gene in Macrophages but Not in Fibroblasts
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 26, 2001;
276(44):
40769 - 40777.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Caivano, B. Gorgoni, P. Cohen, and V. Poli
The Induction of Cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA in Macrophages Is Biphasic and Requires both CCAAT Enhancer-binding protein beta (C/EBPbeta ) and C/EBPdelta Transcription Factors
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 21, 2001;
276(52):
48693 - 48701.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|