Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohshima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohshima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 28, Issue of July 12, 1996 pp. 16784-16791
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

TTA·TAA Triplet Repeats in Plasmids Form a Non-H Bonded Structure*

(Received for publication, February 28, 1996, and in revised form, May 1, 1996)

Keiichi Ohshima , Seongman Kang Dagger , Jacquelynn E. Larson and Robert D. Wells §

From the Institute of Biosciences and Technology, Center for Genome Research, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Texas A&M University, Texas Medical Center, Houston, Texas 77030-3303

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

CTG·CAG, CGG·CCG, and AAG·CTT triplet repeats proximal to or in disease genes expand by a non-Mendelian genetic process to cause several human hereditary syndromes. As part of our physical, biological, and genetic studies on the 10 possible triplet repeats, we discovered that the TTA·TAA repeat, isolated from the upstream region of the variant surface glycoprotein gene of Trypanosoma brucei, shows a propensity to adopt a non-H bonded structure under appropriate conditions. The other nine triplet repeat sequences do not exhibit this property. (TTA·TAA)n, where n = 90, 60, 30, and 18, cloned into pUC19 was studied by chemical and enzymatic probes as well as two-dimensional gel electrophoretic analyses under a variety of conditions. The helix opening was observed for all four inserts in supercoiled plasmids as a function of temperature, pH, metal ions, and buffer conditions using OsO4, diethyl pyrocarbonate, and chloroacetaldehyde probes. This unusual property of the TTA·TAA repeat suggests that it plays a different role from the other nine triplet repeats in gene expression.


INTRODUCTION

Biologically unstable repeating CTG·CAG, CGG·CCG, and AAG·CTT triplet DNA sequences are involved in the etiology of several neurological diseases (reviewed in the accompanying paper (1)). To date, only these three types of repeating triplet sequences have been associated with human hereditary diseases; a total of 10 triplet repeats are possible. Other triplet repeats have been observed in human and mammalian microsatellites (2, 3, 4). Several long tracts of TRS have been identified in the human genome using the repeat expansion detection method (5), which is based on hybridization of short triplet repeat oligonucleotides, and fluoresence in situ hybridization (6). The only triplet repeat containing 100% A/T is TTA·TAA.

A survey of triplet repeats in the human genome revealed that TTA·TAA is the most abundant (by at least 4-fold) and is the most frequently polymorphic (4). Also, the TTA·TAA microsatellites are very abundant in introns but are uncommon in exons (3) and were implicated in regulation of transcription (7, 8). At least one protein binds to TTA·TAA microsatellites (9). A 270-bp1 tract of this sequence is found upstream of a variant surface glycoprotein gene of Trypanosoma brucei (10). Since long AAG·CTT tracts have very recently been implicated as the cause of Friedreich's ataxia (11), perhaps some of the other seven triplet repeats will also be associated with other hereditary diseases.

Simple repeating DNA sequences such as homo-, di-, and other types of repeats adopt non-B DNA conformations in recombinant plasmids under appropriate conditions of negative supercoil density, ionic environments, protein binding, etc. (reviewed in the accompanying paper (1)). As part of a broader investigation (1, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19)2 on the biochemical and biological behaviors of all 10 triplet repeat sequences (TRS), we report that the TTA·TAA sequence has a propensity to adopt non-paired single-stranded regions under the influence of negative supercoil density and heat.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmids

pGE117.6, which contains (TTA·TAA)90 derived from the variant surface glycoprotein gene of T. brucei (gift of Dr. David A. Campbell, University of California at Los Angeles) (10), was digested with SspI, and then the -1104 to -761 fragment (344 bp), which contained the TTA·TAA repeat and the neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences, was recloned into the HincII site of pUC19 to give pRW3143. pRW3148, pRW3146, and pRW3145 were constructed as described (19). Briefly, pRW3143 was digested with SacI and HindIII, and regions corresponding to fragments with shorter TTA·TAA repeats (invisible by staining with ethidium bromide) were eluted from a 1.8% agarose gel. These components were recloned into the SacI-HindIII site of pUC19. All plasmid DNAs were isolated from Escherichia coli HB101 by the alkaline lysis method as described (20). All DNA inserts were sequenced on both strands to determine the TTA·TAA repeat sizes of the plasmids.

Chemical Probes

Three chemical probes, OsO4 (Aldrich), diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC) (Aldrich), and chloroacetaldehyde (CAA) (Fluka), were used to modify the TTA·TAA repeat containing plasmids as described previously (21, 22, 23). 3 µg of DNA was reacted with each reagent in 100-µl reaction volume under the conditions described in the figure legends. After the reactions, all samples were purified by gel filtration through Sephadex G-50 microcolumns equilibrated with H2O (20) and precipitated with ethanol. Both strands of the modified plasmids were analyzed by primer extension (1, 13) or chemical degradation analyses (24).

Primer Extension Analysis

After chemical probing, the DNA was analyzed by the procedure described previously (1, 13). The DNA was dissolved in 20 µl of a solution containing 0.2 M NaOH and 2 ng of 5'-32P-end-labeled primer. For primer extension analysis, two primers were used, namely M13/pUC forward sequencing primer 1211 (17-mer, New England Biolabs) and M13/pUC reverse sequencing primer 1201 (16-mer, New England Biolabs) for the bottom and top strands, respectively. The plasmid was heated for 90 s at 90 °C followed by incubation for 4 min at room temperature. The DNA was neutralized with 0.3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.2) and was precipitated with ethanol. The DNA was resuspended in 10 µl of a solution containing 40 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 20 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5 mM 2'-deoxynucleoside triphosphates, and 5 units of a modified T7 DNA polymerase (Sequenase Version 2.0, U. S. Biochemical Corp.), and incubated for 10 min at 37 °C. After termination of the reaction by the addition of 95% formamide and 20 mM EDTA, the DNA was fractionated on a 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gel, and the bands were visualized by autoradiography.

Chemical Degradation Reactions

The modified DNA was divided into two samples, digested with either SacI and HindIII or EcoRI and PstI, and labeled with [alpha -32P]dATP using the large fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment, U. S. Biochemical Corp.). After isolation from a polyacrylamide gel, the DNA fragments were treated with 1 M piperidine for 30 min at 90 °C, lyophilized, and applied to a 12% denaturing polyacrylamide gel in parallel with sequencing markers generated by the chemical degradation method (24). The bands were visualized by autoradiography.

Generation of Topoisomers

Topoisomers of plasmids were prepared as described previously (25). Briefly, DNAs with various supercoil densities were generated by incubating 6 µg of DNA in 100 µl of a solution containing 10 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.6), 50 mM KCl, 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 1 mM EDTA, 0-11 µM ethidium bromide, and chicken erythrocyte topoisomerase (26) for 60 min at 37 °C. The ethidium bromide and topoisomerase were removed by two phenol extractions followed by two ether extractions, and the pooled DNAs were resuspended in H2O after ethanol precipitation.

Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was performed as described previously (27). Mixtures of topoisomer populations prepared as described above were subjected to first-dimension gel electrophoresis in 1.25% agarose at 3.3 V/cm at 25 °C in 0.5 × TBE buffer (pH 8.3) (0.5 × TBE, 45 mM Tris borate, 1 mM EDTA) or TAE buffer (pH 8.0) (TAE, 40 mM Tris acetate, 1 mM EDTA). The gel then was soaked in 0.5 × TBE buffer (pH 8.3) containing 0.7-20 µM chloroquine diphosphate (Sigma) for 3 h. Electrophoresis in the second dimension was carried out at a 90° angle to the first dimension at 3.3 V/cm at 25 °C in 0.5 × TBE buffer (pH 8.3) containing 0.7-20 µM chloroquine diphosphate.


RESULTS

Plasmids Containing TTA·TAA Repeat Sequences

Fig. 1 shows the cloned sequences in the recombinant plasmids and a list of the plasmids used in this study. Three plasmids with shorter TTA·TAA repeats were produced as described (19) from the original pRW3143, which contains (TTA·TAA)90. As expected, only a part of the perfect (TTA·TAA)90 repeat was deleted; inserts with 60, 30, and 18 repeats of TTA·TAA were produced. The plasmids were designated pRW3148, pRW3145, and pRW3146, respectively.


Fig. 1. Plasmids used in this study. The SspI fragment (344 bp) of pGE117.6 containing (TTA·TAA)90 and the neighboring sequences was cloned into the HincII site of pUC19. pRW3148, pRW3145, and pRW3146 were constructed as described under ``Materials and Methods,'' as a result of deletions from pRW3143.

Chemical Probing

To investigate the formation of unusual DNA (non-B DNA) structures, such as Z-DNA, triplexes, and cruciforms, chemical probes have been used (28, 29) because they can specifically modify bases in single-stranded or conformationally perturbed DNA or B-Z junctions. The modified base(s) can be detected by cleavage of the modified sites with a specific reagent (i.e. hot piperidine) or the primer extension assay which detects the inhibition of elongation by DNA polymerase. In this study, we used OsO4, DEPC, and CAA to evaluate the existence of non-B DNA structures in the TTA·TAA repeat sequences.

OsO4 reacts at the C-5=C-6 double bond of pyrimidines (T >>  C) in the presence of tertiary amines, such as pyridine and 2,2'-bipyridine, and is substantially more reactive to single-stranded DNA than to double-stranded DNA (21, 30, 31, 32). It has been used for the single-stranded regions of cruciforms (32, 33, 34) and triplexes (21, 35) and for the structural perturbations at B-Z junctions (36). For inverted repeat sequences neighbored by (A + T)-rich sequences, OsO4 was used as a chemical probe to detect unpaired single-stranded DNA (32, 33, 37, 38, 39). Also, AT·AT repeat sequences were found to form cruciform structures by detection of single-stranded regions with OsO4 (40, 41, 42). DEPC carboxyethylates purines (A > G) at the N-7 position by the opening of the imidazole ring in single-stranded DNA as in triplexes (21, 35) and cruciforms (34, 43, 44) or in a syn conformation as in Z-DNA (36, 45). On the other hand, CAA as well as bromoacetaldehyde reacts at the N-1 and the C-6 amino groups of adenines or the N-3 and the C-4 amino groups of cytosines to generate 1,N6-ethenoadenine or 3,N4-ethenocytosine derivatives at unpaired adenines or cytosines (46, 47), and has been used for single-stranded regions of cruciforms in inverted repeats containing (A + T)-rich sequences (48) and AT·AT repeat sequences (49), for triplexes (22, 23), and for B-Z junctions (50, 51).

Fig. 2 shows chemical reactivities with these three chemical probes (OsO4, DEPC, and CAA) on the bottom strand of pRW3146, which contains 18 repeats of TTA·TAA, as analyzed by the primer extension assay. By this analysis, the modified bases, thymines by OsO4 and adenines by DEPC or CAA, on the template strand were detected by the inhibition of elongation by the DNA polymerase (Sequenase) at the corresponding bases on the extended strand. Surprisingly, modifications were observed throughout the (TAA)18 sequence by all three chemical probes as a result of inhibition of elongation by Sequenase on the top strand (TTA strand) (Fig. 2, lanes 1, 3, and 5). The (A + T)-rich sequences, which are located on the 3' side of (TTA)18 and contain (TTA)5 and (TTA)2, also were modified by DEPC and CAA (Fig. 2, lanes 3 and 5) but not by OsO4 (Fig. 2, lane 1). We also determined that the modification pattern of bromoacetaldehyde was identical to that of CAA (data not shown). These observations may result from the fact that DEPC was reacted at 20 °C for 30 min, a longer reaction time than with OsO4, and CAA was used at 37 °C for 30 min, a higher temperature and a longer reaction time than with OsO4. On the other hand, on the bottom strand (TAA strand), modifications by OsO4, DEPC, and CAA gave the same pattern as those of the top strand (TTA strand) (data not shown), indicating the existence of unpaired regions in both strands of supercoiled pRW3146.


Fig. 2. Fine mapping of chemical modification sites on the bottom strand of pRW3146. The supercoiled plasmid pRW3146 ( = -0.06) was modified by OsO4, DEPC, and CAA (lanes 1, 3, and 5, respectively). Lane 1, supercoiled pRW3146 was incubated in TE buffer (pH 7.4) at 20 °C for 20 min and then modified by 1.1% OsO4 in the presence of 2% pyridine at 20 °C for 10 min. Lane 3, the DNA was incubated under the same condition described above and then modified by 10% DEPC at 20 °C for 30 min. Lane 5, the DNA was incubated under the same condition described above and modified by 2% CAA at 37 °C for 30 min. After chemical probing, the modified sites were mapped using the primer extension method as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' The control plasmids (lanes 2, 4, and 6) were treated similarly except no modifying chemicals were added. The G, A, T, and C sequencing lanes are indicated for the top strand of unmodified pRW3146 using the same primer as for the modified samples. The corresponding 2',3'-dideoxynucleoside triphosphates (U. S. Biochemical Corp.) were added to the reaction mixtures. The sequence of the top strand is indicated at the left side of the gel.

We investigated the effect of the length of the TTA·TAA repeats. Fig. 3 shows the OsO4 modification patterns for different lengths of TTA·TAA repeat containing plasmids under the same conditions described above. From 18 up to 90 repeats of TTA·TAA, the modifications were evenly distributed throughout the TTA·TAA repeats on both strands (Fig. 3, A and B, lanes 1, 3, 5, and 7), indicating that unpaired regions exist in all of these lengths of TTA·TAA repeats.


Fig. 3. Fine mapping of OsO4 modification sites on the bottom and top strands of plasmids containing different lengths of TTA·TAA repeats. The supercoiled plasmids pRW3146, pRW3145, pRW3148, and pRW3143 ( = -0.06) were incubated in TE buffer (pH 7.4) at 20 °C for 20 min and then modified by 1.1% OsO4 in the presence of 2% pyridine for 10 min. After modification with OsO4, samples were analyzed by the primer extension method. Panel A shows the results of modification on the bottom strand of pRW3146. The sequence of the top strand is indicated on the sides of the gel. Panel B shows the results of modification on the top strand of pRW3146. The sequence of the bottom strand is indicated on the sides of the gel.

Recently, we observed that CTG·CAG repeat sequences derived from the myotonic dystrophy gene and CGG·CCG from the fragile X gene, even without chemical modification, caused pausings of DNA polymerases, namely Sequenase, the Klenow fragment of E. coli DNA polymerase I, and human DNA polymerase beta  (13). This behavior was attributed to the formation of a new type of non-B conformation by this triplet repeat sequence. Parallel studies were performed on the TTA·TAA triplet repeats described herein. No pausing of Sequenase was found on both strands of all TTA·TAA inserted plasmids (Fig. 3, A and B, lanes 2, 4, 6, and 8), even with preincubation (at 37 or 50 °C for 10 min) before primer extension, a condition which strongly enhanced the pausings for CTG·CAG repeat sequences (13). No chemical probes were employed in this study. Also, there was no pausing with the Klenow fragment in the absence of chemical modifications, even under the preincubation conditions (data not shown). Hence, we conclude that TTA·TAA repeats do not adopt unusual DNA conformations that inhibit the progression of DNA polymerase, in contrast to the behavior with CTG·CAG and CGG·CCG repeats.

Influence of Negative Supercoil Density

The chemical probing described above revealed that TTA·TAA repeat sequences formed unpaired regions at the supercoil density of -0.06. Some unusual DNA structures (left-handed Z-DNA, cruciforms, triplexes) are known to be induced by negative superhelical density in recombinant plasmids (21, 35, 52, 53, 54, 55). Accordingly, the effect of superhelical density on OsO4 modification on these TTA·TAA sequences was investigated. Fig. 4 shows the quantitation of the amount of OsO4 modification for pRW3146 as a function of average negative supercoil densities (-). At low supercoil density (<= 0.025), few OsO4 modification sites were observed. In linearized pRW3146, no sites were observed by chemical degradation analyses (data not shown). As the torsional stress was increased, however, the degree of OsO4 modification increased. The reactivity relative to supercoiling shown in Fig. 4 is broad compared with the all-or-none transitions found for triplexes or cruciforms. 80% of the transition took place over 0.07 density units, whereas only ~0.01 was required for the other conformational changes (35, 52, 56). Thus, the gradual transition (Fig. 4) indicates that a larger duplex region is unpaired as more supercoil density is added to the system.


Fig. 4. Effect of negative supercoil density on OsO4 modification of pRW3146. Topoisomer populations of pRW3146 were prepared as described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Each topoisomer population of pRW3146 was incubated in TE buffer (pH 7.4) at 20 °C for 20 min and then modified by 1.1% OsO4 in the presence of 2% pyridine for 10 min. After modification with OsO4, samples were analyzed by the primer extension method. The autoradiograms were scanned with a Molecular Dynamics model 300 series Computing Densitometer. The amount of OsO4 modification in the (TTA·TAA)18 repeat and the (A + T)-rich neighboring sequences is shown in arbitrary units relative to the reaction with the relaxed DNA (which was background).

Two-dimensional Gel Electrophoresis

Supercoil-dependent alternate structures of DNA, such as cruciforms, triplexes, and Z-DNA, have been detected by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (38, 39, 53, 54, 55). The chemical probe analyses described above suggested that unpaired DNA regions exist throughout the TTA·TAA repeat and in a part of the (A + T)-rich neighboring sequence, depending on the conditions employed. We used two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis to further investigate the unwound DNA regions revealed by the chemical probing results. The topoisomer populations of pUC19, pRW3146, and pRW3145 were analyzed as shown in Fig. 5. pRW3146 and pRW3145 exhibited an initial relaxation of 3.5 and 5 supercoil turns, respectively, at topoisomer numbers -10 and -11. This corresponded to relaxation of 37 and 53 bp at supercoil densities of -0.037 and -0.041, similar to the superhelical density at which the initiation of OsO4 modification occurred (Fig. 4 for pRW3146 and data not shown for pRW3145). The relaxation continued until topoisomer numbers -17 and -18 (superhelical density -0.061 and -0.063, respectively). The total relaxation for pRW3146 and pRW3145 was 10.5 and 12 supercoil turns corresponding to unpairing of 110 and 126 bp, respectively. These results indicate the relaxation of the entire region of the perfect TTA·TAA repeat (54 and 90 bp, respectively) and the neighboring (A + T)-rich 40-bp sequences. This observation was consistent with the results of the chemical probing in 0.5 × TBE buffer (pH 8.0) described below. No transition was observed for the control pUC19. The electrophoresis was repeated on the same samples in TAE buffer (pH 8.0). Interestingly, no transitions were observed. This result will be discussed in the next section.


Fig. 5. Two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis of topoisomers of pUC19, pRW3146, and pRW3145. A tracing of each of the gels is shown to the right of the photographs. The DNA preparation and the gel conditions were described under ``Materials and Methods.'' Chloroquine concentration in the second dimension was 0.7, 0.75, and 0.8 µM for pUC19, pRW3146, and pRW3145, respectively. 20 µM chloroquine also was used to increase resolution of pRW3145 (data not shown). The first dimension direction is from top to bottom, and the second dimension direction is from left to right. The bright spot labeled N in the upper left-hand corner of each tracing corresponds to nicked plasmid DNA, and the spot in the middle labeled L corresponds to linear DNA.

Similar studies were performed on pRW3143 which contains 90 repeats of TTA·TAA with 20 µM chloroquine in the second dimension. Whereas the resolution of the gel did not permit an accurate determination of the total number of topoisomers relaxed, at least 26 were detected indicating an unpairing of at least 270 bp.

Effect of Environmental Conditions

Temperature and salt concentration have been shown to affect the unpairing of (A + T)-rich sequences as well as AT·AT repeat sequences in a supercoiled molecule (37, 38, 39, 42, 54, 57, 58). (A + T)-rich sequences were observed to induce adjacent inverted repeats to form cruciform structures via the C-type extrusion formed by large-scale helix opening, and this was dependent on supercoil density, temperature, and salt concentration (37). Bowater and co-workers (39) observed that large-scale opening of (A + T)-rich regions within a supercoiled molecule was suppressed by salt. It is also known that AT·AT repeat sequences form cruciform structures at low temperature or in the presence of metal ions (Na+, Mg2+, K+, Ca2+, [(NH3)Co]3+, etc.) (40, 42). Thus, we investigated the effect of temperature and metal ions for the TTA·TAA repeat sequence. On the presumption that T·T and A·A bp might be formed in addition to A·T pairs in the TTA·TAA sequence, a TTA·TAA repeat could form a cruciform structure.

Fig. 6 shows the effect of temperature on OsO4 modification of supercoiled pRW3146. As the temperature was increased, OsO4 modification intensified in the (TAA)18 region. pRW3146 contains an (A + T)-rich region, 87.5% A/T content, adjacent to a perfect (TAA)18. At 37 °C, the (A + T)-rich region was strongly modified. This modification pattern was identical to that found with CAA (Fig. 2, lane 5). However, at lower temperatures, 0 or 10 °C, there was little modification and the patterns did not reveal the presence of cruciforms.


Fig. 6. Fine mapping of OsO4 modification on the top strand of pRW3146 as a function of reaction temperature. The supercoiled pRW3146 ( = -0.06) was incubated in TE buffer (pH 7.4) at the indicated temperature for 20 min and then modified by 1.1% OsO4 in the presence of 2% pyridine at the indicated temperature for 10 min. After modification with OsO4, samples were analyzed by the primer extension method. The sequence of the bottom strand is indicated at the left side of the gel.

The reversibility of the temperature effect was investigated. After preincubation at one temperature (i.e. 37, 20, 10, or 0 °C) for 20 min, the chemical probe reaction was conducted at a second temperature (i.e. 0, 10, 20, or 37 °C) for 10 min. The resulting OsO4 modification pattern was the same as that found when the second temperature was used for both the preincubation and the reaction (data not shown). Thus, this result indicates that the helix opening in the (TAA·TTA)18 repeat and the neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences is formed reversibly as a function of temperature.

The effect of metal ions on the OsO4 modification patterns also was investigated for supercoiled pRW3146. In the case of NaCl up to 75 mM, the modification was observed throughout the (TAA·TTA)18 tract at 20 °C, but at 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 and 20 °C, no modification was observed (data not shown). Under physiological conditions, at 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4 and 37 °C, although the modification was observed throughout the (TAA·TTA)18 region, the intensity of OsO4 modification was much weaker than with no NaCl (data not shown). Incidentally, for the range 0.1-150 mM NaCl, no cruciform-like structures were observed. On the other hand, in the presence of 5 mM MgCl2 or higher, no modification was observed at 20 °C, pH 7.4, while there was modification throughout the (TAA·TTA)18 region up to 1 mM MgCl2 (data not shown). Thus, metal ions (Na+, Mg2+), especially at higher concentration, inhibited helix opening.

As described above, when two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was performed in TAE buffer (pH 8.0) instead of 0.5 × TBE buffer (pH 8.3) in the first dimension, no transitions were observed, although a positive control, pRW1561, containing a potential Z-DNA sequence (55) exhibited the expected transitions in both buffers (data not shown). To further investigate this result, we evaluated the effect of buffer conditions (pH and salt concentration) on the OsO4 modification of supercoiled pRW3146. There were distinct differences in the modification patterns as influenced by salt and pH. In 0.5 × TBE buffer (pH 8.0), the entire 94-bp (A + T)-rich regions (the (TTA·TAA)18 repeat and the 40 bp of 87.5% A/T sequence on the 3' side) were modified (Fig. 7, A and B, lane 1), in agreement with the two-dimensional gel results. On the other hand, in TAE buffer (pH 8.0), the OsO4 modification was observed throughout the (TTA·TAA)18 repeat and the neighboring (TTA·TAA)5 repeat sequences, although the intensity of the modification in the (TTA·TAA)2 repeat region was much less than that in 0.5 × TBE buffer (pH 8.0). While this result seems inconsistent with that of the two-dimensional gel electrophoresis described above, it is known that OsO4 reactions are more sensitive than the two-dimensional gel electrophoresis analysis because the gels measure an equilibrium state, whereas the OsO4 reactions can detect a transitory relaxation. Since the ionic strength of the two buffers is similar, it appears that the borate ions favor the helix opening, whereas the acetate ions may preserve the hydrogen bonded B-DNA conformation.


Fig. 7. Effect of environmental conditions (pH and buffer) on OsO4 modification of pRW3146. The supercoiled pRW3146 ( = -0.06) was incubated in the indicated buffer and at the indicated temperature for 20 min and then modified by 1.1% OsO4 in the presence of 2% pyridine at the indicated temperature for 10 min. The modified DNA was divided into two samples, and both strands were analyzed by the primer extension method. Panel A shows the results of modification on the bottom strand of pRW3146. The sequence of the top strand is indicated at the left side of the gel. Panel B shows the results of modification on the top strand of pRW3146. The sequence of the bottom strand is indicated at the left side of the gel.

The modification also was influenced by pH. The (TTA·TAA)5 repeat sequence was modified more strongly at pH 8.0 than at pH 7.4 in TE buffer (TE, 50 mM Tris-Cl, 1 mM EDTA) (Fig. 7, A and B, lanes 3 and 5), whereas at acidic pH (pH 4.5) in TAE buffer (Fig. 7, A and B, lane 9) the modification pattern was similar to that at pH 7.4. Hence, these results indicate that the helix opening in the (TTA·TAA)18 repeat and the neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences of pRW3146 are influenced not only by pH, salt, and metal ion concentration but also by the type of anion.


DISCUSSION

We demonstrate that a TTA·TAA triplet repeat sequence shows the unusual propensity of adopting a non-H bonded structure in plasmids under appropriate conditions of supercoiling, temperature, pH, salt, and metal ion concentrations. Compared with the other nine TRS, only this TRS exhibits this behavior. The SspI fragment of pGE117.6, which contains 90 repeats of TTA·TAA and the neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences, was inserted into pUC19 to give pRW3143. Kang et al. (19) constructed several lengths of CTG·CAG repeats in plasmids by deletion of the original 130-repeat sequence derived from the myotonic dystrophy gene (19), and similar procedures worked effectively for other triplet repeats (1, 14, 15). Using this method, we constructed three other plasmids with shorter TTA·TAA repeats (60, 30, and 18 triplets) from pRW3143 as a result of deletions of a portion of the (TTA·TAA)90 tract. Attempts to obtain expansions (1, 14, 19) of (TTA·TAA)90 were unsuccessful.

The opened helix structure was observed in all four inserts by chemical probe (OsO4, DEPC, and CAA) and two-dimensional gel electrophoretic analyses. All thymines and adenines in both strands of the TTA·TAA repeats reacted with the reagents and were detected by the primer extension assay as a result of the inhibition of elongation by the DNA polymerase (Sequenase). This result shows that non-H bonded single-stranded regions exist throughout the repeats. These single-stranded regions may be disoriented random coils or may be highly ordered, stacked structures; our data do not enable more definitive conclusions from a structural standpoint.

Fig. 8 shows a model of the unpairing of the TTA·TAA repeats and the neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences in pRW3146. This model also pertains to other longer TTA·TAA repeats since the chemical reactivities by OsO4 were similar to that of pRW3146. This indicates that the helix opening of the TTA·TAA repeats and the neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences is not influenced by the repeat lengths. The opening was dependent on negative supercoil density and was not observed for linear DNA. The unpairing occurred gradually over a broad range of supercoil density, especially as compared with that found for triplexes or cruciforms. Hence, the transition is not a cooperative, all-or-none process.


Fig. 8. Model for the unpairing of the TTA·TAA repeats and the neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences in supercoiled pRW3146. The model of the occurrence of unpairing in the TTA·TAA repeats and the neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences is based on observations from chemical modification and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis studies. The (TTA·TAA)18 tract is unpaired first. The neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences, including (TTA·TAA)5 and (TTA·TAA)2, are melted at elevated temperatures or under different buffer conditions. Each environmental condition (temperature, buffer, pH) is indicated at the right side of the figure. The strand containing the TTA·TAA repeat sequences is cross-hatched. The neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences excluding (TTA·TAA)5 and (TTA·TAA)2 are shaded. The top strand is 5' to 3' from left to right.

The unpairing of the neighboring (A + T)-rich sequence was sensitive to environmental conditions also. As the temperature was increased, the (A + T)-rich sequence was modified strongly by OsO4. At 37 °C, the TTA·TAA repeats and the neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences were entirely opened, but both regions were not opened at 0 °C (Fig. 8). The other neighboring region (5' side of the TTA·TAA repeats) was not unpaired even at 37 °C. Hence, high A/T content sequences were easily opened. The unpaired structure formed reversibly as a function of temperature. This temperature-sensitive type of helix opening has been found in other (A + T)-rich sequences (37, 38, 39, 42, 54, 57). Different modification patterns were found between OsO4 (reaction time of 10 min) and DEPC (reaction time of 30 min) at 20 °C, indicating that longer incubation times caused further unpairing.

In addition, the concentration of metal ions affected the helix opening. Na+ (150 mM) and Mg2+ (5 mM) inhibited the unpairing at 20 °C. Under physiological conditions (37 °C, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4), the intensity of the OsO4 modification was low, suggesting that in vivo the opening may not be occurring. Bowater et al. (39) suggested that some proteins will be required to facilitate the helix unpairing in order to regulate gene expression in vivo. Umek and Kowalski (59) also suggested that an (A + T)-rich sequence destabilizes helical structure and promotes unwinding for the initiation of DNA replication. The original (TTA·TAA)90 and the neighboring (A + T)-rich sequences are located in the region upstream of the transcription start site, suggesting that the region may play a role in transcriptional initiation. However, the biological function(s) of the TTA·TAA tracts is unknown.

Furthermore, the opening was influenced by pH and buffer conditions. OsO4 modifications differed in the (TTA·TAA)5 tract between pH 7.4 and 8.0 in TE buffer. There also were different modifications between pH 4.5 and 8.0 in TAE buffer. Two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis showed relaxations in 0.5 × TBE buffer (pH 8.3) but not in TAE (pH 8.0), although the ionic strength of the two buffers is similar. On the other hand, OsO4 reactivities were observed in both buffers although there was a difference between the two buffers in the (TTA·TAA)2 tract. This suggested that the OsO4 reaction is more sensitive than the two-dimensional gel electrophoresis; the gels measure an equilibrium state between relaxed and unrelaxed molecules, whereas the OsO4 reactions can detect a transient single-stranded region. This electrophoresis phenomenon is peculiar to the (A + T)-rich sequence in this study because plasmids containing a Z-DNA forming sequence showed relaxation in both buffers. These results also indicate that the borate ions favor the helix unpairing more than the acetate ions. Sodium acetate has been shown in previous work (60) on studies with left-handed Z-DNA to have an unconventional effect on DNA conformation.

Kang et al. (13) observed strong pausings of DNA polymerases (Sequenase, the Klenow fragment, and human DNA polymerase beta ) at specific locations within CTG·CAG and CGG·CCG repeats depending on the number of repeats and pretreatment of the duplex template, indicating that appropriate lengths of the repeats adopted a non-B DNA conformation(s) which caused the pausings. We tested the capacity of the TTA·TAA repeats to cause pausing in the primer extension assay; 90 repeats of TTA·TAA, as well as the shorter inserts (Fig. 1), did not show any pausings of the DNA polymerases as had been found for CTG·CAG and CGG·CCG repeats. By comparison, pausings had been observed for 80 repeats of CTG·CAG (13). This and other studies (1, 13, 15)2 show that the TTA·TAA and the other nine repeats have quite different biochemical and genetic properties.

Although the mechanism of the expansion of the CTG·CAG, CGG·CCG, and AAG·CTT repeats is not yet known (1, 12, 14, 15, 19, 61), slippage-mediated DNA structures may cause expansion during DNA replication (12, 62, 63, 64). Schlötterer and Tautz (65) showed that the synthesis rate for the TTA·TAA repeat in vitro is the fastest of the 10 triplet repeats, indicating that slippage correlated with the A/T content of the sequences. These results, along with the case of base pair disruption, may explain why polymerase pausing was not found with the TTA·TAA repeat. Since the TTA·TAA repeat sequences have several physical, biochemical, and genetic properties that differ significantly from those observed for the other nine repeats (1, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16),2 we conclude that this sequence may play different roles in gene regulation.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM52982, National Science Foundation Grant DMB-9103942, and the Robert A. Welch Foundation. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    Present address: Laboratory of Genetic Disease Research, National Center of Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, Bldg. 49, Bethesda, MD 20892.
§   To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 713-677-7651; Fax: 713-677-7689; E-mail: rwells{at}ibt.tamu.edu.
1   The abbreviations used are: bp, base pair(s); TRS, triplet repeat sequence; DEPC, diethyl pyrocarbonate; CAA, chloroacetaldehyde.
2   R. Gellibolian, A. Bacolla, M. Shimizu, S. Amirhaeri, S. Kang, K. Ohshima, J. E. Larson, Y.-H. Fu, C. T. Caskey, B. A. Oostra, and R. D. Wells, manuscript in preparation.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. J. Klysik, R. P. Bowater, and A. Jaworski for valuable discussions.


REFERENCES

  1. Ohshima, K., Kang, S., Larson, J. E., Wells, R. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16773-16783 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Beckmann, J. S., Weber, J. L. (1992) Genomics 12, 627-631 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Stallings, R. L. (1994) Genomics 21, 116-121 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Gastier, J. M., Pulido, J. C., Sunden, S., Brody, T., Buetow, K. H., Murray, J. C., Weber, J. L., Hudson, T. J., Sheffield, V. C., Duyk, G. M. (1995) Hum. Mol. Genet. 4, 1829-1836 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Lindblad, K., Zander, C., Schalling, M., Hudson, T. (1994) Nat. Genet. 7, 124 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Haaf, T., Sirugo, G., Kidd, K. K., Ward, D. C. (1996) Nat. Genet. 12, 183-185 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Lozano, G., Levine, A. J. (1991) Mol. Carcinogen. 4, 3-9 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Brinster, R. L., Allen, J. M., Behringer, R. R., Gelinas, R. E., Palmiter, R. D. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 836-840 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Richards, R. I., Holman, K., Sutherland, G. R. (1993) Hum. Mol. Genet. 2, 1429-1435 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Campbell, D. A., van Bree, M. P., Boothroyd, J. C. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 2759-2774 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Campuzano, V., Montermini, L., Moltò, M. D., Pianese, L., Cossée, M., Cavalcanti, F., Monros, E., Rodius, F., Duclos, F., Monticelli, A., Zara, F., Cañizares, J., Koutnikova, H., Bidichandani, S. I., Gellera, C., Brice, A., Trouillas, P., De Michele, G., Filla, A., De Frutos, R., Palau, F., Patel, P. I., Di Donato, S., Mandel, J.-L., Cocozza, S., Koenig, M., Pandolfo, M. (1996) Science 271, 1423-1427 [Abstract]
  12. Wells, R. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 2875-2878 [Free Full Text]
  13. Kang, S., Ohshima, K., Shimizu, M., Amirhaeri, S., Wells, R. D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27014-27021 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Ohshima, K., Kang, S., Wells, R. D. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 1853-1856 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Shimizu, M., Gellibolian, R., Oostra, B. A., Wells, R. D. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 258, 614-626 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Chastain, P. D., II, Eichler, E. E., Kang, S., Nelson, D. L., Levene, S. D., Sinden, R. R. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 16125-16131 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Wang, Y.-H., Amirhaeri, S., Kang, S., Wells, R. D., Griffith, J. D. (1994) Science 265, 669-671 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Wang, Y.-H., Griffith, J. (1995) Genomics 25, 570-573 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Kang, S., Jaworski, A., Ohshima, K., Wells, R. D. (1995) Nat. Genet. 10, 213-218 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2nd Ed. , Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  21. Hanvey, J. C., Klysik, J., Wells, R. D. (1988) J. Biol. Chem. 263, 7386-7396 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Kohwi, Y., Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 3781-3785 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Kang, S., Wells, R. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20889-20891
  24. Maxam, A. M., Gilbert, W. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 74, 560-564 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Singleton, C. K., Wells, R. D. (1982) Anal. Biochem. 122, 253-257 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Germond, J. E., Hirt, B., Oudet, P., Gross-Bellard, M., Chambon, P. (1975) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 72, 1843-1847 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Wang, J. C., Peck, L. J., Becherer, K. (1983) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 47, 85-91
  28. Wells, R. D., Collier, D. A., Hanvey, J. C., Shimizu, M., Wohlrab, F. (1988) FASEB J. 2, 2939-2949 [Abstract]
  29. Sinden, R. R. (1994) DNA Structure and Function , Academic Press, San Diego
  30. Beer, M., Stern, S., Carmalt, D., Mohlhenrich, K. H. (1966) Biochemistry 5, 2283-2288 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Chang, C.-H., Beer, M., Marzilli, L. G. (1977) Biochemistry 16, 33-38 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Lilley, D. M. J., Palecek, E. (1984) EMBO J. 3, 1187-1192 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Glikin, G. C., Vojtiskova, M., Rena-Descalzi, L., Palecek, E. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 1725-1735 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Klysik, J. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 17430-17437 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Hanvey, J. C., Shimizu, M., Wells, R. D. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 5950-5956 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Johnston, B. H., Rich, A. (1985) Cell 42, 713-724 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Furlong, J. C., Sullivan, K. M., Murchie, A. I. H., Gough, G. W., Lilley, D. M. J. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 2009-2017 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Bowater, R., Aboul-ela, F., Lilley, D. M. J. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 11495-11506 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Bowater, R. P., Aboul-ela, F., Lilley, D. M. J. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 2042-2050 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Greaves, D. R., Patient, R. K., Lilley, D. M. J. (1985) J. Mol. Biol. 185, 461-478 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  41. McClellan, J. A., Palecek, E., Lilley, D. M. J. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 9291-9309 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. McClellan, J. A., Lilley, D. M. J. (1987) J. Mol. Biol. 197, 707-721 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  43. Scholten, P. M., Nordheim, A. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 3981-3993 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Furlong, J. C., Lilley, D. M. J. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 3995-4007 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Herr, W. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82, 8009-8013 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Kayasuga-Mikado, K., Hashimoto, T., Negishi, T., Negishi, K., Hayatsu, H. (1980) Chem. & Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 28, 932-938
  47. Kohwi-Shigematsu, T., Gelinas, R., Weintraub, H. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 80, 4389-4393 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Lilley, D. M. J. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 3097-3111 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Dayn, A., Malkhosyan, S., Duzhy, D., Lyamichev, V., Panchenko, Y., Mirkin, S. (1991) J. Bacteriol. 173, 2658-2664 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Vogt, N., Marrot, L., Rousseau, N., Malfoy, B., Leng, M. (1988) J. Mol. Biol. 201, 773-776 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Kohwi-Shigematsu, T., Manes, T., Kohwi, Y. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 84, 2223-2227 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Collier, D. A., Wells, R. D. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 10652-10658 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Haniford, D. B., Pulleyblank, D. E. (1985) Nucleic Acids Res. 13, 4343-4363 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Kowalski, D., Natale, D. A., Eddy, M. J. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 85, 9464-9468 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Jaworski, A., Hsieh, W.-T., Blaho, J. A., Larson, J. E., Wells, R. D. (1987) Science 238, 773-777 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Singleton, C. K. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 7661-7668 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Kowalski, D. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 7071-7086 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Sheflin, L. G., Kowalski, D. (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12, 7087-7104 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Umek, R. M., Kowalski, D. (1988) Cell 52, 559-567 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  60. Zacharias, W., Martin, J. C., Wells, R. D. (1983) Biochemistry 22, 2398-2405 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  61. Kang, S., Ohshima, K., Jaworski, A., Wells, R. D. (1996) J. Mol. Biol. 258, 543-547 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  62. Wells, R. D., Sinden, R. R. (1993) Genome Analysis (Davis, K. E., Warren, S. T., eds) , Vol 7, p. 107, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
  63. Richards, R. I., Sutherland, G. R. (1994) Nat. Genet. 6, 114-116 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Strand, M., Prolla, T. A., Liskay, R. M., Petes, T. D. (1993) Nature 365, 274-276 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  65. Schlötterer, C., Tautz, D. (1992) Nucleic Acids Res. 20, 211-215 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. D. Wells, R. Dere, M. L. Hebert, M. Napierala, and L. S. Son
Advances in mechanisms of genetic instability related to hereditary neurological diseases
Nucleic Acids Res., July 8, 2005; 33(12): 3785 - 3798.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Dere, M. Napierala, L. P. W. Ranum, and R. D. Wells
Hairpin Structure-forming Propensity of the (CCTG{middle dot}CAGG) Tetranucleotide Repeats Contributes to the Genetic Instability Associated with Myotonic Dystrophy Type 2
J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 2004; 279(40): 41715 - 41726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. van der Wel, H. R. Morris, M. Panico, T. Paxton, A. Dell, L. Kaplan, and C. M. West
Molecular Cloning and Expression of a UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc):Hydroxyproline Polypeptide GlcNAc-transferase That Modifies Skp1 in the Cytoplasm of Dictyostelium
J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2002; 277(48): 46328 - 46337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Volker, N. Makube, G. E. Plum, H. H. Klump, and K. J. Breslauer
Conformational energetics of stable and metastable states formed by DNA triplet repeat oligonucleotides: Implications for triplet expansion diseases
PNAS, November 12, 2002; 99(23): 14700 - 14705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. G. Khan, E.J. Metter, R. E. Tarone, V. A. Bohr, L. Grossman, M. Hedayati, S. J. Bale, S. Emmert, and K. H. Kraemer
A new xeroderma pigmentosum group C poly(AT) insertion/deletion polymorphism
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2000; 21(10): 1821 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. Bacolla, R. Gellibolian, M. Shimizu, S. Amirhaeri, S. Kang, K. Ohshima, J. E. Larson, S. C. Harvey, B. D. Stollar, and R. D. Wells
Flexible DNA: Genetically Unstable CTG·CAG and CGG·CCG from Human Hereditary Neuromuscular Disease Genes
J. Biol. Chem., July 4, 1997; 272(27): 16783 - 16792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Ohshima and R. D. Wells
Hairpin Formation during DNA Synthesis Primer Realignment in Vitro in Triplet Repeat Sequences from Human Hereditary Disease Genes
J. Biol. Chem., July 4, 1997; 272(27): 16798 - 16806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Ohshima, S. Kang, J. E. Larson, and R. D. Wells
Cloning, Characterization, and Properties of Seven Triplet Repeat DNA Sequences
J. Biol. Chem., July 12, 1996; 271(28): 16773 - 16783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohshima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohshima, K.
Right arrow Articles by Wells, R. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement