|
Volume 271, Number 28,
Issue of July 12, 1996
pp. 16939-16944
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Membrane Topology and Retention of Microsomal Aldehyde
Dehydrogenase in the Endoplasmic Reticulum*
(Received for publication, April 8, 1996)
Ryuichi
Masaki
,
Akitsugu
Yamamoto
and
Yutaka
Tashiro
From the Department of Physiology and Division of Cell Biology,
Liver Research Center, Kansai Medical University, Moriguchi,
Osaka 570, Japan
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Microsomal aldehyde dehydrogenase (msALDH) is
anchored to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane by the hydrophobic
domain at its carboxyl terminus, and most of the molecule is exposed to
the cytoplasm (Masaki, R., Yamamoto, A., and Tashiro, Y. (1994)
J. Cell Biol. 126, 1407-1420). To determine the membrane
topology and the intracellular localization of msALDH, the
amino-terminal region of bovine opsin containing
N-glycosylation sites was fused to the carboxyl terminus of
msALDH, and three chimeric proteins with extensions of different sizes
were expressed in COS cells. Indirect immunofluorescence microscopy
showed the ER localization of all of the chimeric proteins similar to
wild-type msALDH. Immunoblotting revealed that the two chimeric
proteins containing longer extensions, those with the
N-glycosylation site at distances of 13 and 21 amino acids
from the membrane anchor, respectively, were glycosylated. These
results indicate that the membrane binding domain of msALDH spans the
bilayer of the ER. The carbohydrate chain of the chimeras was sensitive
to endoglycosidase H but resistant to endoglycosidase D. Upon treatment
of transfected COS cells with brefeldin A, the carbohydrate chain was
processed to an endoglycosidase H-resistant form, presumably by
cis/medial Golgi-specific enzymes redistributed in the ER. These
biochemical results in addition to immunofluorescence microscopic
observations suggest that msALDH is retained in the ER by blockading of
the exit from the ER.
INTRODUCTION
Resident endoplasmic reticulum (ER)1
membrane proteins are integrated into the membrane cotranslationally or
post-translationally. A typical example of the former case is
microsomal cytochrome P450 (P450), which is synthesized on the rough ER
(1), and inserted into and anchored to the ER membrane by its
amino-terminal hydrophobic sequence (2). Thus, the hydrophobic sequence
functions not only as an uncleavable signal sequence for signal
recognition particle-dependent insertion into the ER
membrane but also as a stop-transfer signal (3, 4). Recent studies have
shown that the hydrophobic domain of P450 spans the ER membrane and
that the amino terminus is luminally oriented (5, 6).
On the other hand, microsomal aldehyde dehydrogenase (msALDH) has no
amino-terminal signal/anchor sequence (7) and is synthesized on free
ribosomes (8). This protein has a hydrophobic sequence at its carboxyl
terminus (7) (see Fig. 1) which functions as a membrane anchor (9).
Recently, we showed that two hydrophilic sequences, one on both sides
of the membrane binding domain at the carboxyl terminus (see Fig. 1),
play important roles in ER targeting (9). Thus, msALDH is
post-translationally inserted into the ER membrane, and most of the
molecular portion is exposed to the cytoplasm (8, 9). However, it
remains to be determined whether the carboxyl terminus of msALDH is
located in the luminal side of the ER (a transmembrane structure) or is
oriented toward the cytoplasm (a hairpin loop structure). Elucidation
of the membrane topology of msALDH is important for understanding the
mechanism of post-translational insertion of tail-anchored
proteins.
Fig. 1.
Amino-terminal sequence of bovine opsin and
carboxyl-terminal sequences of msALDH and ALDH/OP1-3. ALDH
mutants with N-glycosylation signals (ALDH/OP1-3) were
constructed as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The
single amino acid code is used, and the amino acid numbers are shown on
top of each sequence. The N-glycosylation sites
of bovine opsin (19) and ALDH mutants are shown by dotted
underlining. The carboxyl-terminal hydrophobic sequence and the ER
targeting sequences of msALDH (9) are underlined and
double underlined, respectively.
Another unresolved question is how msALDH is retained in the ER. Recent
studies have shown that a Lys-Asp-Glu-Leu (KDEL) sequence in soluble
luminal ER proteins and a carboxyl-terminal sequence of
Lys-Lys-X-X (KKXX) or
Lys-X-Lys-X-X (KXKXX) in
integral ER membrane proteins function as retrieval signals for the
transport of these proteins back to the ER from the intermediate
compartment (10, 11, 12). In contrast, P450 seems to be retained in the ER
without recycling through the intermediate compartment (5, 13, 14).
However, nothing is known about the mechanism of ER retention of
msALDH.
In this study, we have examined the membrane topology and the ER
retention of msALDH by adding potential glycosylation sites to the
carboxyl terminus of this protein. The resulting chimeric proteins were
glycosylated in transfected COS cells, supporting the transmembrane
structure of the carboxyl terminus of msALDH. In addition, the
sensitivity of the carbohydrate chain to endoglycosidases and
glycosidase in addition to immunofluorescence microscopic data suggest
that this protein is retained in the ER without recycling between the
ER-Golgi compartments.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Materials
Fetal bovine serum and Dulbecco's minimal
essential medium were purchased from Filtron Co. (Brooklyn, Australia)
and Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan), respectively.
Brefeldin A and antibiotics were obtained from Epicenter Technologies
(Madison, WI) and Life Technologies, Inc., respectively.
[35S]Methionine-cysteine was from DuPont NEN.
Goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with peroxidase was purchased from
Tago, Inc. (Burlingame, CA). Goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with
rhodamine and anti-mouse IgG conjugated with fluorescein were obtained
from Protos Immunoresearch (San Francisco) and American Qualex
Antibodies & Immunochemicals Co. (La Mirada, CA), respectively. Mouse
monoclonal antibodies against human protein disulfide isomerase were
from Fuji Yakuhin Kogyo Co., Ltd. (Toyama, Japan). Rabbit antibodies
against rat liver msALDH were obtained and characterized as described
(7).
Protein A-Sepharose 4B was from Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology Inc.
(Uppsala, Sweden). Endoglycosidase H (endo H), endoglycosidase D (endo
D), and N-glycosidase F were purchased from Boehringer
Mannheim. Restriction enzymes and DNA-modifying enzymes were obtained
from Nippon Gene (Toyama, Japan) and Takara Co., Ltd. (Kyoto, Japan).
DNA sequencing kits were from U. S. Biochemical Corp. Oligonucleotide
primers were synthesized with an Applied Biosystem model 381A DNA
synthesizer. All other chemicals were of the highest purity
commercially available.
The cDNA encoding bovine opsin in the pSP vector and a 50%
suspension of Staphylococcus aureus were kindly provided by
Dr. Takashi Morimoto (New York University) and Dr. Shigeru Taketani
(Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan), respectively.
Plasmid Constructions
All constructions were verified by
the dideoxy chain termination method (15) and restriction enzyme
digestion. The full-length cDNA for rat msALDH (7) was inserted
into the HindIII-EcoRV sites of the mammalian
expression vector, pMIW (16), to construct pMIWALDH. Chimeric cDNAs
between msALDH and bovine opsin were constructed by the gapped duplex
method of oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis (17), followed by
either annealing of oligonucleotides or the polymerase chain reaction.
Synthetic oligonucleotide 1 (5 -TCAAGGATCAGCTGT GA T TG AGCCTCTACTGAAG-3 ),
with the mutated nucleotides underlined, was used for the generation of
XbaI and AccI sites at the carboxyl terminus of
msALDH. The mutated cDNA was inserted into pMIW digested with
HindIII and EcoRV to construct pMIWALDHXA, which
encodes msALDH with an additional Ser-Arg-Val-Asp (SRVD) sequence
(amino acids 485-488) at its carboxyl terminus.
For construction of pMIWALDH/OP1, oligonucleotides 2 (5 -CTGTCTAGATCCAACAAGACGGTCGACTGATGAA-3 ) and 3 (5 -TTCATCAGTCGACCGTCTTGTTGGATCTAGACAG-3 ) were annealed, digested
with XbaI and AccI, and then ligated into the
XbaI-AccI sites of pMIWALDHXA. Similarly,
oligonucleotides 4 (5 -CTGTCTAGATCCAACAAGAAGGTCGACTGATGAA-3 ) and 5 (5 -TTCATCAGTCGACCTTCTTGTTGGATCTAGACAG-3 ) were used to create
pMIWALDH/OP1TK. pMIWALDH/OP2 was produced from oligonucleotides 6 (5 -CTGTCTAGATTCTACGTGCCTTTCTCCAACAAGACGGTCGACTGA-3 ) and
7 (5 -TCAGTCGACCGTCTTGTTGGAGAAAGGCACGTAGAATCTAGACAG-3 ).
Polymerase chain reactions involving the following primers and
templates were performed to amplify DNA fragments termed OP2TK, OP3,
and OP3TK: OP2TK, oligonucleotides 8 (5 -AACAAACTCAGGTACCCT-3 ) and 9 (5 -TCAGTCGACC TCTTGTTGGA-3 ), with the mutated nucleotide
underlined, and pMIWALDH/OP2 as a template; OP3, oligonucleotides 10 (5 -CTGTCTAGAATGAACGGGACCGAGGG-3 ) and 11 (5 -TTCACTAGTCGACCGTCTTGTTGGAGAAAG-3 ), and pSPOpsin as a
template; and OP3TK, oligonucleotides 10 and 12 (5 -TCAGTCGACC TCTTGTTGGA-3 ), and pMIWALDH/OP3 as a
template. The XbaI-AccI fragments of
polymerase chain reaction products were ligated into pMIWALDHXA
digested with XbaI and AccI. The resultant
plasmids were designated as pMIWALDH/OP2TK, pMIWALDH/OP3, and
pMIWALDH/OP3TK, respectively.
Expression in COS Cells
The transfection of COS cells,
subcellular fractionation, membrane extractions, and indirect
immunofluorescence microscopy were performed as described previously
(9). Samples were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate
(SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) (18), followed by
immunoblotting as described (9).
Biosynthetic Labeling of COS Cells and
Immunoprecipitation
Forty-four hours after transfection, the
cells were preincubated at 37 °C with or without brefeldin A (10 µg/ml) in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium devoid of methionine
and fetal bovine serum and then pulse labeled for 30 min in the same
medium containing 200 µCi/ml [35S]methionine-cysteine.
After labeling, the cells were chased with or without brefeldin A in
complete medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum for 3 h, washed
three times with cold phosphate-buffered saline, and then lysed in 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.15 M NaCl, 1% Nonidet
P-40, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Trasyol, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM dithiothreitol for
15 min on ice. The lysates were centrifuged for 30 min in a
microcentrifuge, and the resulting supernatants were preincubated with
the S. aureus suspension for 30 min on a rotating device at
4 °C. Then ALDH/OP3 was immunoprecipitated from the precleared
medium by the addition of rabbit anti-msALDH antibodies followed by
incubation with protein A-Sepharose 4B for 2 h. Immunoprecipitates
were washed four times with RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.3% CHAPS, and 2 mM EDTA).
The proteins were eluted by heating at 100 °C for 2 min in 1% SDS
and 1% -mercaptoethanol.
Endoglycosidase and Glycosidase Treatments
For endo H
treatment, the eluates were adjusted to 50 mM sodium
citrate, pH 5.5, 1% Nonidet P-40, and 1% -mercaptoethanol and then
incubated with or without 1 milliunit of endo H overnight at 37 °C.
Digestions with endo D (2 milliunits of enzyme) were carried out
overnight at 37 °C in 100 mM sodium citrate, pH 6.5, 10 mM EDTA, and 2% Triton X-100. Digestions with
N-glycosidase F (0.4 unit of enzyme) were carried out
overnight at 37 °C in 50 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, and 1% Nonidet P-40. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE followed by
fluorography.
RESULTS
Construction and Immunofluorescence Localization of msALDH Mutants
in COS Cells
To examine the membrane topology and the
intracellular localization of msALDH, we fused the amino-terminal
region of bovine opsin (19), which contains two
N-glycosylation sites at Asn-2 and Asn-15 (Fig.
1), to the carboxyl terminus of msALDH. Three chimeras,
designated as ALDH/OP1-3, have extensions of different sizes at their
carboxyl termini (Fig. 1). Asn-488 of ALDH/OP1 and Asn-493 of ALDH/OP2
correspond to Asn-15 of bovine opsin. They are located at distances of
8 and 13 amino acids from the membrane anchor, respectively. ALDH/OP3
has the longest extension, and Asn-488 and Asn-501, which are present
at distances of 8 and 21 amino acids from the membrane anchor,
correspond to Asn-2 and Asn-15 of bovine opsin, respectively.
These mutants as well as wild-type msALDH were expressed transiently in
COS cells under the control of the -actin promoter and Rous sarcoma
enhancer in the pMIW expression vector (16). We first determined the
intracellular localization of the expressed proteins by double indirect
immunofluorescence microscopy. Cells were fixed and permeabilized
44 h after transfection, and then the expressed proteins were
detected by incubation with anti-msALDH antibodies. Endogenous protein
disulfide isomerase was stained with the corresponding monoclonal
antibodies. When wild-type msALDH was expressed in COS cells, large
granular structures containing both msALDH and protein disulfide
isomerase appeared in addition to reticular structures (Fig.
2, A and B), as reported
previously (9). Recently, we revealed that the structures are composed
of regularly arranged crystalloid smooth ER and that overexpression of
msALDH in COS cells causes the formation of crystalloid ER (20). A
similar pattern of staining was observed when COS cells were
transfected with cDNA for either ALDH/OP1 (not shown), ALDH/OP2
(not shown), or ALDH/OP3 (Fig. 2, C and D). These
immunofluorescence microscopic data indicate that the attachment of the
short extension to the carboxyl terminus of msALDH does not influence
either the ER localization of the chimeras or the formation of
crystalloid ER in COS cells.
Fig. 2.
Immunofluorescence localization of msALDH and
ALDH/OP3. COS cells were transfected with msALDH (panels
A and B) or ALDH/OP3 (panels C and
D) in the pMIW expression vector, fixed 44 h after
transfection, and then permeabilized. The expressed proteins were then
detected by incubation with anti-msALDH antibodies, followed by with
rhodamine-conjugated IgG (panels A and C). Endogenous
protein disulfide isomerase was stained with the corresponding
monoclonal antibodies followed by with fluorescein-conjugated IgG
(panels B and D).
Glycosylation of msALDH Mutants
We next analyzed the
expressed proteins by immunoblotting. Forty-four hours after
transfection, the cells were harvested and subjected to subcellular
fractionation. In this case, the postnuclear supernatant was
centrifuged at 88,000 × g for 80 min to separate the
membrane fraction from the cytosol fraction. As expected, the three
chimeric proteins as well as wild-type msALDH were recovered
exclusively in the membrane fraction (Fig.
3A). In addition, these mutants in the
membrane fraction were resistant to alkali extraction (Fig.
3B), showing that the three chimeras as well as msALDH are
integral membrane proteins. These results, in agreement with indirect
immunofluorescence microscopic data, also indicate that the
carboxyl-terminal extensions do not interfere with integration of the
chimeric proteins into the ER membrane. As shown in Fig. 3A
(lanes 1 and 3), ALDH/OP1 exhibited a mobility
almost identical to that of msALDH (54 kDa). Two bands were observed
for ALDH/OP2 (lane 5): one with a mobility corresponding to
that of the protein moiety (55 kDa) of the chimera and a slower
migrating band with a mobility shift of about 3 kDa. The mobility of
ALDH/OP3 was also shifted about 3 kDa compared with that of its protein
moiety (56 kDa) (lane 7). These results suggest that Asn-493
of ALDH/OP2 and Asn-501 of ALDH/OP3 are glycosylated, whereas Asn-488
of ALDH/OP1 and Asn-488 of ALDH/OP3 are not.
Fig. 3.
Immunoblot analysis of msALDH and
ALDH/OP1-3. COS cells transfected with cDNA encoding msALDH
or ALDH/OP1-3 in the pMIW expression vector were harvested 44 h
after transfection. Panel A, the membrane (pellet) and
cytosol (supernatant) fractions were prepared by centrifugation of the
postnuclear fraction at 88,000 × g for 80 min.
Panel B, the membrane fractions were treated with 100 mM Na2CO3 at 0 °C for 30 min and
then centrifuged at 88,000 × g for 80 min to separate
the pellet from the supernatant. Each fraction was assayed by
immunoblotting using anti-msALDH antibodies. Lane 1, msALDH
(pellet); lane 2, msALDH (supernatant); lane 3,
ALDH/OP1 (pellet); lane 4, ALDH/OP1 (supernatant);
lane 5, ALDH/OP2 (pellet); lane 6, ALDH/OP2
(supernatant); lane 7, ALDH/OP3 (pellet); lane 8,
ALDH/OP3 (supernatant).
To confirm the N-glycosylation of ALDH/OP2 and ALDH/OP3, we
constructed an additional series of ALDH/OP chimeras (TK mutants,
ALDH/OP1TK-3TK) (Fig. 4A), in which each
threonine residue (Thr-490 of ALDH/OP1, Thr-495 of ALDH/OP2, or Thr-503
of ALDH/OP3) in the N-glycosylation signal (consensus
sequence Asn-X-Thr), except for Thr-490 of ALDH/OP3, is
replaced by a lysine residue. They were expressed in COS cells, and
their intracellular localization was determined by indirect
immunofluorescence microscopy. As expected, the staining patterns of
all TK mutants were similar to that of msALDH, indicating the ER
localization of the mutants (not shown). They were then analyzed by
immunoblotting. ALDH/OP1TK exhibited a mobility identical to that of
ALDH/OP1 (Fig. 4B, lanes 2 and 3), and
ALDH/OP2TK showed the same mobility as that of the lower band of
ALDH/OP2 (lanes 4 and 5). In contrast, ALDH/OP3TK
migrated faster than ALDH/OP3 and exhibited a mobility corresponding to
that of its protein moiety (lanes 6 and 7). Taken
together, these biochemical results support the transmembrane topology
model, in which the carboxyl terminus is translocated across the ER
membrane to be glycosylated in the luminal side. In addition, these
results suggest that the efficiency of N-glycosylation in
ALDH/OP chimeras depends on the position of an Asn residue from the
membrane anchor. Therefore, it seems that Asn-488 of ALDH/OP1 or
ALDH/OP3, which is located at a distance of 8 amino acids from the
membrane anchor, is too close to the membrane to be glycosylated by
oligosaccharyltransferase.
Fig. 4.
Immunoblot analysis of the wild-type and
mutated forms of msALDH. Panel A, the carboxyl-terminal
sequences of TK mutants, in which each threonine residue in the
N-glycosylation signal was replaced by the
underlined lysine residue. These mutants were constructed as
described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The single amino acid
code is used, and the amino acid numbers are shown on top of
each sequence. Panel B, COS cells were transfected with
cDNA encoding the wild-type or the mutated form of msALDH and
harvested 44 h after transfection. Each homogenate was resolved by
SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted using anti-msALDH antibodies. Lane
1, msALDH; lane 2, ALDH/OP1; lane 3,
ALDH/OP1TK; lane 4, ALDH/OP2; lane 5, ALDH/OP2TK;
lane 6, ALDH/OP3; lane 7, ALDH/OP3TK.
Processing of the Newly Synthesized ALDH/OP3 Chimera
We
analyzed the carbohydrate structure of ALDH/OP3 to examine its
intracellular localization. Forty-four hours after transfection, COS
cells were pulse labeled for 30 min with
[35S]methionine-cysteine and chased for 3 h, and
then the radiolabeled chimera was immunoprecipitated with anti-msALDH
antibodies. As shown in Fig. 5 (lane 1), two
major products were immunoprecipitated: one with the molecular mass of
the unglycosylated ALDH/OP3 (56 kDa), and a slower migrating one with
the size expected for its glycosylated form. Upon endo H treatment of
the immunoprecipitated proteins, the upper species was shifted to the
position of the lower one (lane 2), demonstrating that the
upper product is indeed glycosylated and that the carbohydrate
structure of the chimera is of a high mannose type. These results
suggest that ALDH/OP3 does not reach the medial Golgi compartment,
where the modification of glycoproteins to endo H-resistant forms
occurs (21). To rule out the possibility that the chimera reaches the
cis Golgi compartment and then is recycled back to the ER,
immunoprecipitates were digested with endo D. As shown in Fig. 5
(lane 3), the glycosylated ALDH/OP3 was resistant to endo D. Since glycoproteins become sensitive to endo D after processing by
-mannosidase 1A, which is supposed to be located in the cis Golgi
(22), these results suggest that the chimera does not reach the cis
Golgi compartment.
Fig. 5.
Processing of newly synthesized ALDH/OP3 in
control or brefeldin A (BFA)-treated COS cells. COS
cells were transfected with ALDH/OP3 in the pMIW expression vector.
Forty-four hours later, the cells were pulse labeled for 30 min and
subsequently chased for 3 h in complete medium. After
immunoprecipitation, the proteins were either analyzed directly by
SDS-PAGE (lane 1) or after incubation overnight with endo H
(lane 2) or endo D (lane 3). When the effect of
brefeldin A was investigated, cells treated with brefeldin A (10 µg/ml) were pulse labeled for 30 min and subsequently chased for
3 h in complete medium containing brefeldin A. After
immunoprecipitation, the proteins were either analyzed directly by
SDS-PAGE (lane 4) or after incubation overnight with endo
H (lane 5) or N-glycosidase F (lane
6).
To confirm further that ALDH/OP3 is retained in the ER, metabolic
labeling was performed in the presence of brefeldin A, an inhibitor of
ER-Golgi transport (23). It is well known that glycoproteins retained
in the ER are processed rapidly by redistributed cis/medial Golgi
enzymes in brefeldin A-treated cells (24). Therefore, this reagent is a
good indicator for proving the ER retention of ALDH/OP3. Upon treatment
of transfected COS cells with brefeldin A, the chimera took on a form
with a heterogeneous mobility insensitive to endo H (Fig. 5,
lanes 4 and 5). The smear disappeared on
digestion of the immunoprecipitates with N-glycosidase F
(lane 6), an enzyme known to remove all N-linked
carbohydrate chains, indicating that ALDH/OP3 was indeed processed by
cis/medial Golgi enzymes redistributed to the ER as a result of the
brefeldin A treatment. These biochemical results suggest that ALDH/OP3
is not transported to the cis Golgi compartment but is retained in the
ER through a mechanism different from the retrieval or recycling model
(10, 11, 12).
DISCUSSION
Native or artificially introduced N-glycosylation has
been used to determine the membrane topology of proteins, especially
those with multiple membrane-spanning domains (25). By taking advantage
of this strategy, we have shown here that the carboxyl-terminal
membrane binding domain of msALDH spans the phospholipid bilayer and
that the carboxyl terminus is located in the luminal side of the ER. We
have also demonstrated that the efficiency of glycosylation depends on
the distance between the N-glycosylation site and the
membrane anchor. Asn-488, located at a distance of 8 amino acids from
the membrane anchor, was not glycosylated, whereas asparagine located
at a distance of 13 or 21 was glycosylated. These data suggest that
Asn-488 is too close to the membrane to be glycosylated by the
oligosaccharyltransferase, which is composed of ribophorins I and II
and a third 48-kDa protein (26). This result is in agreement with that
obtained by Nilsson and von Heijne (27), who showed that the
N-glycosylation site should be at least 12-14 amino acids
away from the membrane anchor by in vitro
transcription/translation of model proteins in the presence of rough
microsomes. Since msALDH is post-translationally targeted by the
ER-targeting sequences located on either side of the carboxyl-terminal
membrane binding domain and inserted into the ER (9), it is noteworthy
that N-glycosylation takes place not only cotranslationally
during the translocation of nascent polypeptides but also
post-translationally after insertion of the carboxyl-terminal
hydrophobic domain of ALDH/OP chimeras into the ER membrane.
Recent studies have shown that the carboxyl termini of two
tail-anchored proteins, microsomal cytochrome b5
(28) and synaptobrevin (29), exhibit a luminal orientation. After
insertion into the ER membrane in a signal recognition particle- and
Sec61-independent fashion, synaptobrevin is transported to
synaptic-like vesicles through the Golgi apparatus in PC12 cells (29).
Additionally, we have shown that HPC-1/syntaxin 1A (30) is transported
to the plasma membrane after post-translational insertion into the ER
through the carboxyl-terminal hydrophobic domain and that this protein
has a similar membrane topology.2 Although
the transmembrane topology of only the four tail-anchored proteins has
been clarified at present, it appears that most tail-anchored proteins
have a similar topology. Fig. 6 shows the alignment of
the carboxyl-terminal sequences of six tail-anchored proteins,
including the four proteins described above. Since the hydrophobic
domains of these proteins differ in length (16-23 amino acids) and the
composition of hydrophobic amino acids, it is less likely that these
domains are important determinants for the transmembrane topology.
Probably, they function as targeting or retention signals to localize
to their final destinations after insertion into the ER membrane.
Similarly, the carboxyl termini of these proteins exhibit no common
feature. Cytochrome b5 (31), msALDH (7), and
SSO1 (32) have charged residues, whereas the other three proteins do
not. On the contrary, positively charged residues are commonly located
on the amino-terminal side of the hydrophobic domain with the exception
in cytochrome b5, suggesting the important role
of positively charged residues in the translocation of the hydrophobic
domains across the ER membrane. This agrees with the positive inside
rule (33), which states that positively charged residues are
preferentially found on the cytoplasmic sides of membrane proteins.
However, the detail mechanism for the targeting of tail-anchored
proteins to the ER and for integration of the carboxyl-terminal
hydrophobic domains into the ER membrane remains to be resolved.
Fig. 6.
Carboxyl-terminal sequences of
tail-anchored proteins. The carboxyl-terminal sequences of rat
cytochrome b5 (31), rat msALDH (7), bovine
synaptobrevin (36), rat HPC-1/syntaxin 1A (30), yeast SED 5 (37), and
yeast SSO 1 (32) are aligned. The single amino acid code is used. Each
hydrophobic domain is underlined, and positively and
negatively charged residues are denoted by + and at the
top, respectively. To the right, the
intracellular localization of each protein is denoted as ER
for ER, SV for synaptic vesicles, PM for plasma
membranes, or cis Golgi for the cis Golgi
compartment.
It is widely accepted that there are two mechanisms for the
localization of ER resident proteins; one is the retrieval mechanism
from the intermediate compartment, and the other is the retention
mechanism, that is, the blockading of exit from the ER. The
carboxyl-terminal KDEL sequence of luminal ER proteins functions as a
retrieval signal from the intermediate compartment to the ER (10, 11).
In addition, the di-lysine motif (KKXX or
KXKXX) on the cytoplasmic side of some ER
membrane proteins also serves as a retrieval signal (12). On the other
hand, the ER retention signal of P450 has been defined. P450 is
inserted into the ER membrane by its amino-terminal signal/anchor
sequence (2, 3, 4), which also functions as an ER retention signal (14,
34). Additionally, recent studies have shown that the cytoplasmic and
amino-terminal transmembrane domains of P450 contain independent
redundant signals for retention in the ER (35) and that P450 is
retained in the ER without recycling through the intermediate or the
cis Golgi compartment (5, 13, 14). In this study,
N-glycosylation of ALDH/OP chimeras provided a powerful tool
for determining the mechanism for their ER localization. To the best of
our knowledge, this is the first report on the ER retention of a
tail-anchored protein. The carbohydrate chain of ALDH/OP3 was sensitive
to endo H but insensitive to endo D, suggesting strongly that this
chimera does not reach the cis Golgi. The ER retention of the chimera
was checked further by treatment of transfected COS cells with
brefeldin A, which effectively blocks membrane transport out of but not
back to the ER (24). We have shown here that the carbohydrate chain of
ALDH/OP3 is processed to an endo H-resistant form by cis/medial Golgi
enzymes redistributed in the ER as a result of brefeldin A treatment.
These biochemical results are consistent with morphological
observations. Recently, we found that overexpression of msALDH in COS
cells induced the formation of crystalloid ER (20), an aggregate of the
smooth ER in a regular array. In addition, we showed that the smooth ER
proliferated from the rough ER was transformed to the crystalloid ER
and that the bulky cytoplasmic domain of msALDH was necessary for the
formation of the crystalloid ER. By indirect immunofluorescence
microscopy, we have shown here that ALDH/OP chimeras also form the
crystalloid ER. Taken together, it appears that msALDH is retained in
the ER through the blockading of the exit from the ER and that the
smooth ER is assembled into the crystalloid ER through head-to-head
association between the cytoplasmic domains of msALDH overexpressed on
opposing membranes.
In summary, we have found that msALDH has a transmembrane topology and
suggest that this protein is retained in the ER without recycling
between the ER and the intermediate and cis Golgi compartments. Further
investigation is required to elucidate the mechanisms for
post-translational integration into the ER and for retention of msALDH
in the ER.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for
scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture
of Japan and by a grant from the Naito Foundation. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology,
Kansai Medical University, 10-15 Fumizono-cho, Moriguchi, Osaka 570, Japan. Fax: 81-6-993-5319.
1
The abbreviations used are: ER, endoplasmic
reticulum; P450, cytochrome P450; msALDH, microsomal aldehyde
dehydrogenase; endo D, endoglycosidase D; endo H, endoglycosidase H;
PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; CHAPS,
3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propansulfonate.
2
R. Masaki, A. Yamamoto, K. Akagawa, and Y. Tashiro, manuscript in preparation.
Acknowledgments
We thank Kimie Masaki for valuable technical
assistance; and Dr. Shigeru Taketani, Kansai Medical University, and
Dr. Takashi Morimoto, New York University, for the generous gifts of
S. aureus and pSPOpsin, respectively.
REFERENCES
-
Fujii-Kuriyama, Y.,
Negishi, M.,
Mikawa, R.,
Tashiro, Y.
(1979)
J. Cell Biol.
81,
510-519
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bar-Nun, S.,
Kreibich, G.,
Adesnik, M.,
Alterman, L.,
Negishi, M.,
Sabatini, D. D.
(1980)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
77,
965-969
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sakaguchi, M.,
Mihara, K.,
Sato, R.
(1987)
EMBO J.
6,
2425-2431
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Monier, S.,
Van Luc, P.,
Kreibich, G.,
Sabatini, D. D.,
Adesnik, M.
(1988)
J. Cell Biol.
107,
457-470
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Szczesna-Skorupa, E.,
Kemper, B.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
1757-1762
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shimozawa, O.,
Sakaguchi, M.,
Ogawa, H.,
Harada, N.,
Mihara, K.,
Omura, T.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
21399-21402
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Miyauchi, K.,
Masaki, R.,
Taketani, S.,
Yamamoto, A.,
Akayama, M.,
Tashiro, Y.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
19536-19542
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Takagi, Y.,
Ito, A.,
Omura, T.
(1985)
J. Biochem.
(Tokyo)
98,
1647-1652
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Masaki, R.,
Yamamoto, A.,
Tashiro, Y.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
1407-1420
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pelham, H. R. B.
(1988)
EMBO J.
7,
913-918
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lewis, M. J.,
Pelham, H. R. B.
(1992)
Cell
68,
353-364
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jackson, M. R.,
Nilsson, T.,
Peterson, P. A.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
121,
317-333
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yamamoto, A.,
Masaki, R.,
Tashiro, Y.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
1733-1740
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murakami, K.,
Mihara, K.,
Omura, T.
(1994)
J. Biochem. (Tokyo)
116,
164-175
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sanger, F.,
Nicklen, S.,
Coulson, A. R.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
5463-5467
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Suemori, H.,
Kadodawa, Y.,
Goto, K.,
Araki, I.,
Kondoh, H.,
Nakatsuji, N.
(1990)
Cell Differ. Dev.
29,
181-186
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kramer, W.,
Frits, H.-J.
(1987)
Methods Enzymol.
154,
350-367
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Laemmli, U. K.
(1970)
Nature
227,
680-685
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kou, C. H.,
Yamagata, K.,
Moyzis, R. K.,
Bitensky, M. W.,
Miki, N.
(1986)
Mol. Brain Res.
1,
251-260
-
Yamamoto, A.,
Masaki, R.,
Tashiro, Y.
(1996)
J. Cell Sci.
109,
1727-1738
[Abstract]
-
Robbins, P. W.,
Hubbard, S. C.,
Turco, S. J.,
Wirth, D. F.
(1977)
Cell
12,
893-900
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Beckers, C. J. M.,
Keller, D. S.,
Balch, W. E.
(1987)
Cell
50,
523-534
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Misumi, Y.,
Misumi, Y.,
Miki, K.,
Takatsuki, A.,
Tamura, G.,
Ikehara, Y.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
11398-11403
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lippincott-Schwartz, J.,
Yuan, L. C.,
Bonifacino, J. S.,
Klausner, R. D.
(1989)
Cell
56,
801-813
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Michikawa, T.,
Hamanaka, H.,
Otsu, H.,
Yamamoto, A.,
Miyawaki, A.,
Furuichi, T.,
Tashiro, Y.,
Mikoshiba, K.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
9184-9189
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kelleher, D. J.,
Kreibich, G.,
Gilmore, R.
(1992)
Cell
69,
55-65
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nilsson, I.,
von Heijne, G.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
5798-5801
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vergères, G.,
Ramsden, J.,
Waskell, L.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
3414-3422
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kutay, U.,
Ahnert-Hilger, G.,
Hartmann, E.,
Wiedenmann, B.,
Rapoport, T. A.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
217-223
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Inoue, A.,
Obata, K.,
Akagawa, K.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
10613-10619
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ozols, J.,
Heinemann, F. S.
(1982)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
704,
163-173
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Aalto, M. K.,
Ronne, H.,
Keränen, S.
(1993)
EMBO J.
12,
4095-4104
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
von Heijne, G.
(1986)
EMBO J.
5,
3021-3027
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ahn, K.,
Szczesna-Skorupa, E.,
Kemper, B.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
18726-18733
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Szczesna-Skorupa, E.,
Ahn, K.,
Chen, C.-D.,
Doray, B.,
Kemper, B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
24327-24333
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Südhof, T. C.,
Baumert, M.,
Perin, M. S.,
Jahn, R.
(1989)
Neuron
2,
1475-1481
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hardwick, K. G.,
Pelham, H. R. B.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
119,
513-521
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Masaki, K. Kameyama, and A. Yamamoto
Post-Translational Targeting of a Tail-Anchored Green Fluorescent Protein to the Endolpasmic Reticulum
J. Biochem.,
September 1, 2003;
134(3):
415 - 426.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Borgese, S. Colombo, and E. Pedrazzini
The tale of tail-anchored proteins: coming from the cytosol and looking for a membrane
J. Cell Biol.,
June 23, 2003;
161(6):
1013 - 1019.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Yabal, S. Brambillasca, P. Soffientini, E. Pedrazzini, N. Borgese, and M. Makarow
Translocation of the C Terminus of a Tail-anchored Protein across the Endoplasmic Reticulum Membrane in Yeast Mutants Defective in Signal Peptide-driven Translocation
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 24, 2003;
278(5):
3489 - 3496.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Ivashkina, B. Wolk, V. Lohmann, R. Bartenschlager, H. E. Blum, F. Penin, and D. Moradpour
The Hepatitis C Virus RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Membrane Insertion Sequence Is a Transmembrane Segment
J. Virol.,
November 13, 2002;
76(24):
13088 - 13093.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Borgese, I. Gazzoni, M. Barberi, S. Colombo, and E. Pedrazzini
Targeting of a Tail-anchored Protein to Endoplasmic Reticulum and Mitochondrial Outer Membrane by Independent but Competing Pathways
Mol. Biol. Cell,
August 1, 2001;
12(8):
2482 - 2496.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Pedrazzini, A. Villa, R. Longhi, A. Bulbarelli, and N. Borgese
Mechanism of Residence of Cytochrome b(5), a Tail-anchored Protein, in the Endoplasmic Reticulum
J. Cell Biol.,
March 6, 2000;
148(5):
899 - 914.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. A. Profant, C. J. Roberts, A. J. Koning, and R. L. Wright
The Role of the 3-Hydroxy 3-Methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Cytosolic Domain in Karmellae Biogenesis
Mol. Biol. Cell,
October 1, 1999;
10(10):
3409 - 3423.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Greenfield and S High
The Sec61 complex is located in both the ER and the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment
J. Cell Sci.,
January 5, 1999;
112(10):
1477 - 1486.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Shakur, K. Takeda, Y. Kenan, Z.-X. Yu, G. Rena, D. Brandt, M. D. Houslay, E. Degerman, V. J. Ferrans, and V. C. Manganiello
Membrane Localization of Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3). TWO N-TERMINAL DOMAINS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE EFFICIENT TARGETING TO, AND ASSOCIATION OF, PDE3 WITH ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 1, 2000;
275(49):
38749 - 38761.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Szczesna-Skorupa and B. Kemper
Endoplasmic Reticulum Retention Determinants in the Transmembrane and Linker Domains of Cytochrome P450 2C1
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 16, 2000;
275(25):
19409 - 19415.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|