|
Volume 271, Number 28,
Issue of July 12, 1996
pp. 16967-16974
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Purification and Characterization of a Soluble Form of Mammalian
Adenylyl Cyclase*
(Received for publication, March 6, 1996, and in revised form, April 23, 1996)
Carmen W.
Dessauer
and
Alfred G.
Gilman
From the Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235-9041
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
An engineered, soluble form of mammalian adenylyl
cyclase has been expressed in Escherichia coli and purified
by three chromatographic steps. The enzyme utilizes one molecule of ATP
to synthesize one molecule of cyclic AMP and pyrophosphate at a maximal
specific activity of 12.8 µmol/min/mg, corresponding to a turnover
number of 720 min 1. Although devoid of membrane spans,
the enzyme displays all of the regulatory properties that are common to
mammalian adenylyl cyclases. It is activated synergistically by
Gs and forskolin and is inhibited by adenosine (P-site)
analogs with kinetic patterns that are identical to those displayed by
the native enzymes. The purified enzyme is also inhibited directly by
the G protein  subunit complex. After adenovirus-mediated
expression in adenylyl cyclase-deficient HC-1 cells, the enzyme can be
stimulated synergistically by Gs-coupled receptors and
forskolin.
INTRODUCTION
Ten isoforms of mammalian adenylyl cyclase have been identified
during the past 7 years, and these enzymes display a complex array of
both shared and distinct regulatory properties (1, 2). All members of
the family are activated by the subunit of the heterotrimeric G
protein Gs, and receptor-mediated liberation of the
GTP-bound form of Gs is the dominant mechanism for
stimulation of cyclic AMP synthesis. Furthermore, all of the
characterized mammalian adenylyl cyclases are activated by the
diterpene forskolin (3); stimulation of catalysis by forskolin and
Gs is highly synergistic in many cases (type II and
IV-VI adenylyl cyclases). Finally, all family members are also
inhibited by adenosine analogs known as P-site inhibitors (4). The
physiological significance of P-site inhibition is not clear, but at
least some relevant compounds appear to be present at sufficient
concentrations in vivo to affect adenylyl cyclase activity
(5).
Each mammalian adenylyl cyclase is thought to contain a short and
variable amino terminus, followed by two repeats of a unit composed of
six transmembrane spans and a large (~40 kDa) cytosolic domain (6).
Although there is little sequence homology among the various enzymes
within the transmembrane spans, the overall identity of the different
adenylyl cyclases within the cytosolic regions (denoted C1
and C2) ranges from 50 to 90%. The most highly conserved
sequences are within the amino-terminal half of each cytosolic domain
(C1a and C2a). Furthermore, these domains are
~50% similar to each other (within a single adenylyl cyclase) and to
the catalytic domains of the guanylyl cyclases.
Attempts to understand the mechanisms of regulation of adenylyl
cyclases and to relate their common and distinct features to structure
have been frustrated both by low levels of expression and the
requirement for detergent for solubility. To overcome these hurdles,
Tang and Gilman (7) constructed a soluble adenylyl cyclase by linkage
of the C1a domain of the type I enzyme with the
C2 domain of the type II enzyme. Expression of this
molecule in Escherichia coli complemented the catabolic
defect in an adenylyl cyclase-deficient strain of the bacterium. The
crude lysate of such bacteria displayed adenylyl cyclase activity that
was activated synergistically by Gs and forskolin and
that was inhibited by 2 -d3 -AMP,1 a potent
P-site analog. To characterize this molecule further, we have developed
methods to improve its expression and to purify it in a
hexahistidine-tagged form. The basic biochemical properties of this
protein are described herein.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plasmid Construction
The expression vector pTrcH6 was
created by ligation of phosphorylated linkers
(5 -CATGCATCACCATCACCATCACGCCGCCATGGA and
5 -GATCTCCATGGCGGCGTGATGGTGATGGTGATG) with NcoI- and
BamHI-digested pTrcHisA (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). To
produce a construct in frame with the hexahistidine tag, the
1.64-kilobase BspHI-HindIII fragment of
pTrcIC1IIC2L3, which encodes the
soluble adenylyl cyclase (7), was ligated with pTrcH6 that had been
digested with NcoI and HindIII. The
BspHI-HindIII fragment of
pTrcIC1IIC2L3 was also cloned into
the NcoI- and HindIII-digested H6pQE60 vector
(8). The adenovirus shuttle vector
pH6(271)I1II2L3ACCMV
was created by ligation of the 1.6-kilobase
EcoRI-KpnI fragment from
H6pQE(271)I1II2L3 with
the vector ACCMV after digestion with the same enzymes.
Antibodies
Two peptides were synthesized corresponding to
amino acid sequences in the C1 domain of type I adenylyl
cyclase and the C2 domain of type II adenylyl cyclase:
IC1-452 (CGDYEVEPGHGHERNSF) and IIC2-870
(CRSLKNEELYHQSYD). The peptides were coupled to the purified protein
derivative of tuberculin (Stantens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen) (9).
Antibodies were produced in New Zealand White rabbits and
affinity-purified as described (10).
G Protein Subunits
Recombinant Gs was
purified from E. coli as described (8) and activated by
incubation with 50 mM NaHepes (pH 8.0), 10 mM
MgSO4, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM
dithiothreitol, and 400 µM GTP S at 30 °C for 30 min. Free GTP S was removed by gel filtration. Recombinant
1 2 and nonprenylated
1 2 Cys68 Ser were
purified from Sf9 cells as described (11, 12).
Purification of the Soluble Form of Adenylyl Cyclase
Luria
broth medium (18 liter) was inoculated with 180 ml of log-phase
E. coli BL21(DE3) transformed with
H6pTrc(271)I1II2L3;
cells were grown for 1 h at 30 °C and then at room temperature
until they reached an A600 of 0.4. Isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside (20 µM) was added, and cells were harvested 15 h later.
The cells were washed with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA, and mixed protease inhibitors and then frozen in
liquid N2. The mixed protease inhibitors used were 22 mg/liter each L-1-tosylamido-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl
ketone, 1-chloro-3-tosylamido-7-amino-2-heptanone, and
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, plus 3.2 mg/liter each leupeptin and
lima bean trypsin inhibitor.
The frozen cells were resuspended with a Polytron in 1.5 liters of
lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM
-mercaptoethanol, 50 mM NaCl, 0.5 mg/liter aprotinin,
and mixed protease inhibitors), followed by the addition of 0.2 mg/ml
lysozyme while stirring. After 30 min at 4 °C, 32 mg of DNase and 5 mM MgCl2 were added, and the suspension was
incubated for 30 min. The membranes and cell debris were pelleted by
centrifugation for 30 min at 100,000 × g. The
supernatant was supplemented with NaCl (250 mM final
concentration) and loaded onto a 10-ml Ni2+-NTA column
equilibrated with lysis buffer. The column was washed with 25 column
volumes of buffer A (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM -mercaptoethanol, 2 mM MgCl2,
400 mM NaCl, 5 mM imidazole, and mixed protease
inhibitors), followed by 15 column volumes of buffer A containing 15 mM imidazole and 10 column volumes of buffer B (buffer A,
except with 10 mM NaCl and 15 mM imidazole).
The hexahistidine-tagged protein was eluted with 50 ml of buffer B
containing 150 mM imidazole. The Ni2+-NTA
eluate was filtered and loaded onto a Mono Q HR 10/10 fast protein
liquid chromatography column. The column was washed with 40 ml of
buffer C (20 mM NaHepes (pH 8.0), 2 mM
MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, and 2 mM
dithiothreitol) and then eluted with a gradient of 0-400
mM NaCl. Fractions containing adenylyl cyclase activity
were pooled, and (NH4)2SO4 was
added to a final concentration of 0.4 M. This solution was
loaded onto two phenyl-Superose HR 5/5 columns run in tandem, and
protein was eluted with two sequential gradients (using buffer C): 0.4 to 0 M (NH4)2SO4 over
30 ml, followed by 0-15 mM CHAPS over 30 ml. Fractions
were pooled based on adenylyl cyclase activity and purity
(silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gels). The protein was stored in
small aliquots at 70 °C in buffer C containing 11 mM
CHAPS.
Adenylyl Cyclase Assays
Adenylyl cyclase activity was
measured as described by Smigel (13). All assays were performed for
15-20 min at 30 °C in a final volume of 100 µl unless stated
otherwise. The final concentration of MgCl2 was 10 mM. Adenylyl cyclase and G proteins were first incubated on
ice in a total volume of 40 µl. Experiments involving the kinetics of
P-site inhibition and determinations of Km were
initiated by the addition of enzyme. Assays that contained G protein
 subunits were performed in the presence of 1.2 mM
CHAPS.
To quantitate both the reactants and products of the adenylyl cyclase
reaction, incubations were performed in the absence of an
ATP-regenerating system with either -32P- or
-32P-labeled ATP. [ -32P]ATP was used to
measure production of pyrophosphate using a modification of the
charcoal method (14) in which charcoal was equilibrated with 50 mM phosphate and 50 mM pyrophosphate; this
permitted the complete recovery of both molecules.
[ -32P]ATP was used to quantitate loss of ATP and
production of cyclic AMP after their separation by Dowex and alumina
chromatography (15). A portion of each reaction mixture and the
separated products were analyzed by thin layer chromatography in Tb
buffer (16) to assess their purity and to quantitate contaminants in
the labeled ATP. Thin layer chromatography demonstrated no production
of phosphate during the course of the reaction. Recovery of cyclic AMP
during chromatography was determined by quantitation of
[3H]cAMP, which was added at the end of the reaction.
Production of Recombinant Adenovirus
The HC-1 and 293 cell
lines were maintained in Dulbecco's minimal essential medium (Life
Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated calf serum.
To generate recombinant adenovirus, 1 µg of the shuttle vector
pH6(271)I1II2L3ACCMV
and 4 µg of the plasmid pJM17 (17) were cotransfected into 293 cells
using the modified bovine serum transfection kit (Stratagene) according
to the manufacturer's protocol. After transfection, the culture medium
was changed every 2-3 days until cytopathic effects were observed.
Primary virus was identified by polymerase chain reaction (18) using
primers within the cytomegalovirus early gene promoter and the coding
region of the adenylyl cyclase gene. The virus was plaque-purified
(19), and the appropriate viral plaques were amplified and stored in
cell culture medium. Viral titers were estimated by plaque assay and
ranged from 0.5 to 1.5 × 105 plaque-forming units/ml.
The appropriate ratios for infection of HC-1 cells were determined by
immunoblotting and by assay of adenylyl cyclase or -galactosidase
activity in cytosolic fractions of infected cells.
Cyclic AMP Accumulation in HC-1 Cells
Changes in
intracellular concentrations of cyclic AMP were measured by determining
the ratio of radioactivity in cyclic AMP to that in the total ATP and
ADP pools in [3H]adenine-labeled cells (20). HC-1 cells
growing in 12-well plates (0.4 × 106 cells/well) were
infected with 100-150 µl of adenovirus encoding -galactosidase or
the soluble adenylyl cyclase. Medium was removed after 30 h and
replaced with 1.5 ml of medium containing 2 µCi/ml
[3H]adenine. After an additional 18 h, the cells
were washed once with Dulbecco's minimal essential medium containing
20 mM NaHepes (pH 7.4) and then treated at 37 °C with
1.0 mM 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine (a cyclic-nucleotide
phosphodiesterase inhibitor) and various effectors as indicated.
Incubations were terminated by aspiration of medium and addition of 0.9 ml of ice-cold 5% trichloroacetic acid containing 0.1 mM
cyclic AMP. The cells remained on ice for 45 min, and
[32P]cAMP (5000 cpm) was added to each well to quantify
recoveries from columns. Acid-soluble nucleotides were separated on
Dowex and alumina columns according to the method of Salomon et
al. (15). Assays were performed in duplicate, and the values shown
are representative of three experiments.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Expression and Purification of the Soluble Adenylyl
Cyclase
Expression of the hexahistidine-tagged soluble adenylyl
cyclase
(H6(271)I1II2L3) in
E. coli results in the accumulation of ~2-5 nmol of
adenylyl cyclase activity/min/mg in the cytosol. However, >90% of the
adenylyl cyclase protein is found in inclusion bodies and cannot be
solubilized in an active form. Growth of the bacteria at room
temperature permitted the maximal accumulation of soluble and active
protein. Concurrent expression of thioredoxin or the chaperonins GroEL
and GroES increased the amount of adenylyl cyclase protein in the
cytosol (detected by immunoblotting), but failed to increase adenylyl
cyclase activity in these cells (data not shown). A proteolysis product
representing the IIC2 domain (detected by antibody
IIC2-870) also accumulated (Fig.
1A), but fragments containing the
IC1 domain were not detected with antibody
IC1-454 (data not shown).
Fig. 1.
Purification of the soluble adenylyl cyclase.
A, Western blot analysis of the purification of the soluble
adenylyl cyclase from 18 liters of E. coli BL21(DE3)
harboring plasmid
H6pTrc(271)I1II2L3.
Proteins were treated with N-ethylmaleimide, resolved by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on an 11% polyacrylamide gel,
and stained using affinity-purified rabbit IIC2-870
antiserum. Lane 1, 10 µg of clarified lysate; lane
2, 0.9 µg of the Ni2+-NTA pool; lane 3,
0.3 µg of the Mono Q pool; lane 4, 50 ng of the
phenyl-Superose pool. B, Coomassie Blue stain of SDS gels.
Lane 1, 20 µg of clarified lysate; lane 2, 10 µg of the Ni2+-NTA pool; lane 3, 4 µg of the
Mono Q pool; lane 4, 1 µg of the phenyl-Superose pool.
C, chromatographic profile of the Ni2+-NTA
eluate on a Mono Q HR 10/10 column. Adenylyl cyclase activity ( ) was
assayed in the presence of 100 µM forskolin, 0.5 mM ATP, and 10 mM MgCl2.
The soluble adenylyl cyclase activity in the lysate can be enriched
50-fold using Ni2+-NTA chromatography (Table
I). The yield is only ~30%, and much of the lost
activity is not found in the flow-through or washes of the column. The
protein is susceptible to proteases in crude extracts, and rapid
manipulation at this stage improves recovery. Chromatography over the
Mono Q column results in only a 3-fold purification, but several major
contaminants are removed. The low enrichment is due to a broad elution
profile on this and many other columns (Fig. 1C). The
protein is eluted from the final (phenyl-Superose) column with CHAPS in
the absence of salt. Although the detergent can be removed with
retention of enzymatic activity, the stability of the protein is
greatly enhanced by CHAPS during freezing and thawing. The soluble
adenylyl cyclase migrated on sodium dodecyl sulfate-containing
polyacrylamide gels with an apparent Mr of
55,000, as judged by silver staining and immunoblotting, and appeared
to be >90% pure (Fig. 1A); the predicted
Mr of the protein is 56,900.
Table I.
Purification of the soluble adenylyl cyclase from E. coli
Assays were performed with 10 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM ATP, and 100 µM forskolin.
| Purification
step |
Volume |
Protein |
Specific activity |
Total
activity |
Recovery |
Purification
|
|
|
ml |
mg |
nmol/min/mg |
µmol/min |
% |
-fold
|
| Lysate |
1500 |
13,200 |
2.7 |
35.6 |
100 |
1
|
| Ni2+ pool |
50 |
71 |
137 |
9.7 |
27 |
50
|
| Mono Q pool |
81 |
21 |
405 |
8.5 |
24 |
150
|
| Phenyl-Superose
pool |
3.8 |
2.0 |
1900 |
3.7 |
10 |
700 |
|
Our functional criterion for adequate purification was the absence of
interfering enzymatic activities (ATPases, phosphodiesterases,
pyrophosphatases, etc.). For each molecule of ATP consumed by the
preparation, one molecule of cyclic AMP and PPi were
produced (Fig. 2). There is no detectable additional
consumption of ATP even in the absence of any stimulator of adenylyl
cyclase (data not shown). The enzymatic reaction approaches the
equilibrium for the interconversion of ATP, cyclic AMP, and
PPi as measured by Hayaishi et al. (21) with the
adenylyl cyclase from Brevibacterium liquefaciens
(Keq = 0.065 M). Under conditions
where ATP is not limiting, enzymatic activity is linear for >90 min
(data not shown). Since mammalian adenylyl cyclases have two similar
domains that could be involved in nucleotide binding, it is significant
that only one molecule of ATP is utilized for each molecule of cyclic
AMP that is synthesized. Any conformational changes that occur upon
activation of the enzyme are not mediated by hydrolysis of ATP at a
regulatory site.
Fig. 2.
Stoichiometry of the reaction catalyzed by
the soluble adenylyl cyclase. Assays (0.1 µg of protein) were
performed in the absence of any ATP-regenerating system and in the
presence of 10 mM MgCl2, 50 µM
forskolin, and 200 nM GTP S-Gs . ATP ( ),
cyclic AMP ( ), and PPi ( ) were quantified as
described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' All determinations were
performed in duplicate. The experiment shown is representative of
several.
Activation of the Soluble Adenylyl Cyclase
Although the
soluble adenylyl cyclase is a chimera and lacks its integral membrane
domains, it displays most of the regulatory features that are
characteristic of its native counterparts. The enzyme has very low
basal activity (20-50 nmol/min/mg), but can be stimulated >100-fold
by GTP S-Gs or forskolin. The Km
for Mn2+-ATP is ~50 µM and is little
affected by the presence of enzyme activators. However, the
Km for Mg2+-ATP remains relatively low
when the enzyme is stimulated by GTP S-Gs (65 µM), but increases to 620 µM in the
presence of forskolin (Fig. 3). When both
GTP S-Gs and forskolin are present, the
Vmax is 12.8 µmol/min/mg, and the
Km remains elevated (300 µM). Similar
changes have been observed with adenylyl cyclase from bovine brain (22)
or with type I adenylyl cyclase expressed in Sf9 cells (23); the latter
enzyme has a Km of 38 µM with
Mn2+ and forskolin and a Km of 440 µM with Mg2+ and forskolin. Hill plots of the
data in Fig. 3 were linear and gave a value of n = 1.0 with each activator (data not shown).
Fig. 3.
Determination of Vmax
and Ki values for ATP. Assays (7.6 nM protein, 15 min) were performed in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2 and 500 nM
GTP S-Gs ( ), 50 µM forskolin ( ),
or 100 nM GTP S-Gs plus 50 µM forskolin ( ). All determinations were performed in
duplicate and are representative of at least two experiments.
The turnover number for the soluble chimeric adenylyl cyclase is
similar to the values for the native forms of the enzyme. The turnover
number is 360 min 1 in the presence of forskolin and
increases to 720 min 1 with both forskolin and
GTP S-Gs . The turnover numbers for the purified type I
and II adenylyl cyclases are 890 and 260 min 1,
respectively, in the presence of forskolin and Mn2+ (24).
The low Vmax for the
GTP S-Gs -stimulated soluble adenylyl cyclase (Fig. 3)
is due only to the amount of GTP S-Gs used in the
assay compared with the EC50 for activation by
Gs (Fig. 4A). With maximal
amounts of GTP S-Gs , the soluble adenylyl cyclase
displays a Vmax approaching that observed in the
presence of both GTP S-Gs and forskolin (Fig.
4A).
Fig. 4.
Synergistic activation of adenylyl cyclase by
GTP S-Gs and forskolin. Assays (0.9 nM protein, 20 min) were performed in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM ATP.
A, GTP S-Gs plus 0 ([ ), 0.1 ( ), 2 ( ), and 100 ( ) µM forskolin (Fsk);
B, forskolin plus 0 ( ), 30 ( ), and 200 ( )
nM GTP S-Gs . Variations in the maximal
activity of the enzyme are due to losses caused by freezing and
thawing. All determinations were performed in duplicate and are
representative of at least two experiments.
The affinity of the soluble adenylyl cyclase for activated E. coli-derived Gs is ~100-fold lower than that of
type I adenylyl cyclase (Fig. 4A) (25). However, forskolin
potentiates the effect of low concentrations of
GTP S-Gs , shifting the apparent affinity of the
soluble adenylyl cyclase for GTP S-Gs by 2 orders of
magnitude. For example, adenylyl cyclase activity was 9.2 µmol/min/mg
in the presence of 225 nM GTP S-Gs and 2 µM forskolin, while the activities in the presence of
these activators alone were 1.2 and 0.8 µmol/min/mg, respectively.
This striking synergy is typical of type II adenylyl cyclase, but is
not characteristic of the type I enzyme (25, 26). Half-maximal
activation of the soluble adenylyl cyclase was observed with 3 µM forskolin (Fig. 4B), the same concentration
required for type I and II adenylyl cyclases (22). Low concentrations
of GTP S-Gs shift the apparent affinity of forskolin
by 2 orders of magnitude. Unlike the situation with
GTP S-Gs , maximal activity in the presence of
forskolin is significantly less than that observed with
GTP S-Gs or GTP S-Gs plus forskolin
(Fig. 4B).
Ca2+-calmodulin had no stimulatory effect on the soluble
adenylyl cyclase (data not shown); calmodulin activates type I adenylyl
cyclase. However, the C1b region of the type I enzyme that
has been implicated in calmodulin binding is not present in the soluble
protein studied here (27, 28, 29).
Inhibitors of the Soluble Adenylyl Cyclase
Type I and II
adenylyl cyclases differ dramatically in their responses to
Gi proteins and the G protein  subunit complex.
Gi , Go , and  all inhibit type I
adenylyl cyclase (1, 30). The type II enzyme is not affected by
Gi and is greatly stimulated by  in the presence
of Gs (1, 30). The chimeric type IC1/type
IIC2 soluble enzyme is unresponsive to Gi ,
even at 10 µM concentrations (data not shown), but it can
be inhibited almost completely by  (Fig. 5). This
is surprising since the extent of inhibition of purified type I
adenylyl cyclase by  is modest (30%) compared with the more
dramatic inhibition of the membrane-bound protein (24). Inhibition of
the soluble adenylyl cyclase is not due to interaction of  with
Gs since  inhibits forskolin- and
Gs -activated enzymatic activity equally. The apparent
affinity of the soluble adenylyl cyclase for  is substantially
lower (10-fold or more) than that of type I or II adenylyl cyclase.
However, inhibition is still dependent on prenylation of the subunit since the nonprenylated 1 2
Cys68 Ser mutant was inactive at the highest
concentrations tested (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by recombinant
G protein 1 2. The Soluble adenylyl
cyclase (3.6 nM) was assayed for 20 min with 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM ATP, and the
indicated concentrations of  in the presence of 400 nM GTP S-Gs ( ) or 50 µM
forskolin (Fsk; ). The effects of
1 2 Cys68 Ser ( ) were
tested in the presence of GTP S-Gs . Activities are
expressed as percentages of control values measured in the absence of
 : 0.4 and 1.0 µmol/min/mg for GTP S-Gs and
forskolin, respectively. All determinations were performed in duplicate
and are representative of three experiments.
Chimeras have been used successfully to identify regions necessary for
activation of type I and II adenylyl cyclases by calmodulin and protein
kinase C, respectively (31). By coexpression of combinations of
membrane-bound halves of type I and II adenylyl cyclases (noncovalent
chimeras), Tang and Gilman (30) tentatively assigned the site for
synergistic activation of adenylyl cyclase by  to the
carboxyl-terminal half of the molecule. Chen et al. (32)
made a peptide corresponding to the sequence of a region in the
C2 domain of type II adenylyl cyclase that blocks the
interactions of  with several effectors, consistent with the
assignment made by Tang and Gilman. It is thus perhaps surprising that
the soluble adenylyl cyclase described herein is inhibited by 
rather than activated. However, we are hesitant to draw further
conclusions about this phenomenon until comparisons can be made with
nonchimeric soluble forms of the type I and II enzymes and until
binding interactions between  and these domains can be examined
definitively.
It is not clear why Gs and  have reduced
affinities for the soluble adenylyl cyclase relative to its
membrane-bound counterparts or what role the membrane spans play in
signal transduction.  is associated with the plasma membrane, at
least in part because of prenylation of . Its apparent higher
affinity for membrane-bound adenylyl cyclase may be due partially to
the concentrating effect of membrane localization. It is also possible
that  interacts directly with the membrane-spanning regions of
adenylyl cyclase or normally interacts with both the C1 and
C2 domains and that these interactions are constrained in
the chimeric molecule. Despite these uncertainties, the fact that
nonprenylated  failed to inhibit the soluble adenylyl cyclase
points to specific interactions that are dependent on the lipid
modification, rather than to simple concentration at the membrane.
Similar arguments may apply to Gs . However, the
recombinant (E. coli-derived) Gs used here
does not contain lipid modifications and already has a lower affinity
for membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases than does tissue-derived
Gs (33). All mammalian adenylyl cyclases are activated
by Gs in vitro with few quantitative
differences. It thus seems unlikely that the chimeric nature of the
soluble enzyme would contribute to the loss of affinity. Again, it
seems most likely that domains of adenylyl cyclase removed in the
engineered protein (e.g. loops between membrane spans,
C1b, etc.) or conformational constraints imposed by linkage
of C1 and C2 are responsible for the loss of
affinity.
Natural, membrane-bound mammalian adenylyl cyclases are inhibited
directly by adenosine analogs known as P-site inhibitors, so designated
in reference to the requirement for an intact purine ring (4). The most
potent inhibitors are 2 - or 5 -deoxy and 3 -phosphoryl compounds (34).
P-site inhibition displays several unique features. Stimulated forms of
the enzyme are substantially more sensitive to inhibition than are
nonactivated forms. Inhibition is dependent on metal and is
characteristically noncompetitive or mixed noncompetitive with respect
to metal-ATP (35, 36, 37). However, inhibition of the
Gs -activated enzyme is noncompetitive with respect to
Mg2+-ATP (38). All of these features are preserved in the
soluble adenylyl cyclase. This enzyme is significantly more sensitive
to 2 -d3 -AMP when activated by forskolin, GTP S-Gs ,
or the combination of the two regulators than when assayed with
Mn2+ alone (Fig. 6). Thus, the
GTP S-Gs - and forskolin-stimulated enzyme, which is
100-fold more active than the Mn2+-stimulated enzyme, is
>300 times more sensitive to P-site inhibition (IC50 = 3 µM versus ~1 mM). The
IC50 of bovine brain adenylyl cyclase for 2 -d3 -AMP is
2-3 µM in the presence of forskolin or
GTP S-Gs (35).
Fig. 6.
Inhibition by the P-site inhibitor
2 -d3 -AMP. Assays were performed with 0.5 mM ATP for
15 min plus the following: 400 nM GTP S-Gs
( ), 50 µM forskolin (Fsk; ), 100 nM GTP S-Gs plus 50 µM
forskolin ( ), or 2 mM MnCl2 ( ]). Control
activities for these conditions were 1.1, 1.4, 4.5, and 0.05 µmol/min/mg of protein, respectively. All determinations were
performed in duplicate and are representative of two experiments.
P-site inhibition of the GTP S-Gs -stimulated soluble
adenylyl cyclase is noncompetitive with respect to
Mg2+-ATP. This is also true of detergent-solubilized
adenylyl cyclase activity in rat brain (38). Noncompetitive inhibition
is rare in unireactant systems and is characterized by a lower
Vmax, a decreased apparent
Km, and an unchanged
Km/Vmax. The interpretation
is that the inhibitor binds only to the enzyme-substrate complex,
yielding an inactive enzyme. All other activated forms of the soluble
adenylyl cyclase show a mixed noncompetitive pattern of inhibition with
respect to metal-ATP, where both 1/Vmax and
Km/Vmax increase with
increasing inhibitor concentrations (Fig. 7,
B-D). True noncompetitive inhibition implies that the
inhibitor binds with equal affinity to the free enzyme and the
enzyme-substrate complex; inhibitor binding is thus independent of
substrate concentration, and the Km remains
constant. Vmax, Km, and
Vmax/Km all decrease with
increasing concentrations of inhibitor when the soluble adenylyl
cyclase is stimulated with forskolin (Mg2+ or
Mn2+) or GTP S-Gs in the presence of
Mn2+.
Fig. 7.
Kinetic analysis of inhibition by
2 -d3 -AMP. Shown are Eadie-Hofstee analysis and replots
(inset) of 1/Vmax and
Km/Vmax from plots of
inhibition by 2 -d3 -AMP. A, assays (2.7 nM
protein, 15 min) were performed in the presence of 10 mM
MgCl2, 400 nM GTP S-Gs , and no
inhibitor ( ) or 6 µM ( ), 21 µM ( ),
or 60 µM ( ) 2 -d3 -AMP. B, assays were
performed in the presence of 10 mM MgCl2, 50 µM forskolin, and no inhibitor ( ) or 10 µM ( ), 30 µM ( ), or 100 µM ( ) 2 -d3 -AMP. C, assays were performed
as described for A except with 5 mM
MnCl2. D, assays were performed as described for
B except with 2.5 mM MnCl2. All
determinations were performed in duplicate and are representative of at
least two experiments.
The x intercepts of replots of 1/Vmax
or Km/Vmax versus
the concentration of 2 -d3 -AMP represent the values of
Ki and Ki, respectively, where
Ki is the dissociation constant of 2 -d3 -AMP from
the enzyme-inhibitor complex and Ki is the
dissociation constant of 2 -d3 -AMP from the enzyme-substrate-inhibitor
complex (Table II) (39). The calculated
Ki values correspond to the observed
IC50 values for P-site inhibition and correlate well with
those shown in Fig. 6. The factor is equal to 1 in the case of pure
noncompetitive inhibition, >1 when the inhibitor favors binding to the
free enzyme, and <1 when the inhibitor favors binding to the
enzyme-substrate complex. The values of determined here are <1 in
all cases, showing a clear preference of the inhibitor for the adenylyl
cyclase-ATP complex compared with adenylyl cyclase alone. Despite these
observations, it has not been possible to make a simple assignment of
regulatory or catalytic function to the C1 or
C2 domain by a mutagenic approach (23).
The role of metals in influencing Km,
Vmax, and the inhibition patterns is complex.
Mn2+ (compared with Mg2+) decreases
dramatically the Km for ATP in the presence of
forskolin, but has no effect on the Ki for a P-site
inhibitor with this activator. When GTP S-Gs is the
activator, the type of metal determines if 2 -d3 -AMP binds solely to
the adenylyl cyclase-ATP complex or to both this complex and free
adenylyl cyclase. Mn2+ can also influence the
Vmax, usually increasing activity by ~2-fold.
Whether the metal causes each of these changes by working at the active
site, an alternative metal-binding site, or both is still unclear.
Adenovirus-mediated Synthesis of the Soluble Adenylyl Cyclase in
HC-1 Cells
The rat hepatoma HC-1 cell has no detectable adenylyl
cyclase activity, but contains Gs and binding activity
characteristic of the -adrenergic receptor (40). Although these
cells constitute an ideal null background in which to express adenylyl
cyclase, they are difficult to transfect. We thus constructed a
recombinant adenovirus in which expression of the soluble adenylyl
cyclase is driven by the cytomegalovirus early gene promoter. After
infection of cells at virus/cell ratios of 10:1 to 40:1, adenylyl
cyclase activity (0.7 nmol/min/mg) and immunoreactivity were
detectable. We have used this system to study receptor-mediated cyclic
AMP synthesis in vivo. An adenovirus encoding
-galactosidase was utilized as a control.
There was no detectable accumulation of cyclic AMP in noninfected HC-1
cells or in those expressing -galactosidase after exposure to
isoproterenol and/or forskolin (Fig. 8). Similarly,
cyclic AMP did not accumulate in cells expressing the soluble adenylyl
cyclase after treatment with isoproterenol alone. However, there was
substantial accumulation of cyclic AMP in such cells after incubation
with forskolin, and, for data averaged over five time points,
isoproterenol further enhanced cyclic AMP accumulation by 50%. Despite
the absence of all transmembrane-spanning sequences, the soluble
adenylyl cyclase can be activated by a G protein-coupled receptor when
its apparent affinity for Gs is increased by
forskolin.
Fig. 8.
Synergistic stimulation of soluble adenylyl
cyclase activity by forskolin and isoproterenol in HC-1 cells.
HC-1 cells infected with -galactosidase adenovirus
( -gal; ) or
H6(271)I1II2L3
adenovirus (H6-AC; , , ) were
exposed to 10 µM isoproterenol (INE; ), 50 µM forskolin (Fsk; ), or 10 µM isoproterenol + 50 µM forskolin ( ,
) as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Relative
accumulation of cyclic AMP was determined as described under
``Experimental Procedures.'' Each time point was performed in
duplicate, and the experiment shown is representative of three
experiments.
The failure to detect stimulation of cyclic AMP synthesis in the
presence of isoproterenol alone was not unexpected. The apparent
affinities of the soluble adenylyl cyclase for the stimulator
Gs and the inhibitor  are similar. However, in the
presence of forskolin, the apparent affinity of the enzyme for
Gs is increased dramatically, while that for  is
not altered. Furthermore, the soluble adenylyl cyclase studied here is
not unique in its failure to respond to Gs in
vivo in the absence of forskolin. When expressed by transfection,
several membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases have responded only to
synergistic combinations of forskolin and appropriate receptor agonists
(31, 41, 42, 43).
Since the soluble adenylyl cyclase studied here displays most of the
regulatory features that are characteristic of the membrane-bound
enzymes (and cytosolic domains necessary for other phenomena, such as
activation by calmodulin and inhibition by Gi , may be
missing), one wonders if the membrane spans of the native enzymes play
only quantitative roles and are not important qualitatively for
regulation of cyclic AMP synthesis. If so, what is the explanation for
the complex topology of these enzymes, which is conserved in all of its
known isoforms? The best current hypothesis is that of Reddy et
al. (44), who have proposed that the activity state of at least
certain mammalian adenylyl cyclases may be responsive to transmembrane
potential.
In summary, a soluble form of mammalian adenylyl cyclase that displays
all of the regulatory features that are common to the various isoforms
of the enzyme can be synthesized in E. coli and purified.
This approach offers many advantages over study of the native enzymes,
which can be obtained only in microgram quantities from native sources
or after expression in heterologous systems. We hope that the
availability of this protein and related constructs will permit
detailed appreciation of mechanisms of regulation of cyclic AMP
synthesis and their structural counterparts.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health
Grant GM34497, National Institutes of Health National Research Service
Award GM16905 (to C. W. D.), American Cancer Society Grant BE30-O,
the Lucille P. Markey Charitable Trust, and the Raymond and Ellen
Willie Chair of Molecular Neuropharmacology. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Pharmacology,
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines
Blvd., Dallas, TX 75235-9041.
1
The abbreviations used are: 2 -d3 -AMP,
2 -deoxyadenosine 3 -monophosphate; GTP S, guanosine
5 -3-O-(thio)triphosphate; NTA, nitrilotriacetic acid;
CHAPS, 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonic
acid.
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr. Bruce Posner for purified
nonprenylated  and Jeff Laidlaw for excellent technical
assistance.
REFERENCES
-
Taussig, R.,
Tang, W.-J.,
Hepler, J. R.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
6093-6100
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sunahara, R. K.,
Dessauer, C. W.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1996)
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.
36,
461-480
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Seamon, K. B.,
Padgett, W.,
Daly, J. W.
(1981)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
78,
3363-3367
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Londos, C.,
Wolff, J.
(1977)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
74,
5482-5486
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bushfield, M.,
Shoshani, I.,
Johnson, R. A.
(1990)
Mol. Pharmacol.
38,
848-853
[Abstract]
-
Krupinski, J.,
Coussen, F.,
Bakalyar, H. A.,
Tang, W.-J.,
Feinstein, P.
G.,
Orth, K.,
Slaughter, C.,
Reed, R. R.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1989)
Science
244,
1558-1564
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tang, W.-J.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1995)
Science
268,
1769-1772
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lee, E.,
Linder, M. E.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
237,
146-164
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lachmann, P. J.,
Strangeways, L.,
Vyakarnam, A.,
Evan, G.
(1986)
CIBA Found. Symp.
119,
25-57
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mumby, S. M.,
Pang, I.-H.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Sternweis, P. C.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
2020-2026
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kozasa, T.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
1734-1741
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wall, M. A.,
Coleman, D. E.,
Lee, E.,
Iniguez-Lluhi, J. A.,
Posner, B.
A.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Sprang, S. R.
(1995)
Cell
83,
1047-1058
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Smigel, M. D.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
1976-1982
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brandt, D. R.,
Asano, T.,
Pedersen, S. E.,
Ross, E. M.
(1983)
Biochemistry
22,
4357-4362
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Salomon, Y.,
Londos, C.,
Rodbell, M.
(1974)
Anal. Biochem.
58,
541-548
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bochner, B. R.,
Ames, B. N.
(1982)
J. Biol. Chem.
257,
9759-9769
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McGrory, W. J.,
Bautista, D. S.,
Graham, F. L.
(1988)
Virology
163,
614-617
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zhang, W.-W.,
Fang, X.,
Branch, C. D.,
Mazur, W.,
French, B. A.,
Roth, J. A.
(1993)
BioTechniques
15,
868-869
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Graham, F. L.,
Premc, L.
(1991)
Methods Mol. Biol.
7,
109-128
-
Shimizu, H.,
Daly, J. W.,
Creveling, C. R.
(1969)
J. Neurochem.
16,
1609-1619
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hayaishi, O.,
Greengard, P.,
Colowick, S. P.
(1971)
J. Biol. Chem.
246,
5840-5843
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Awad, J. A.,
Johnson, R. A.,
Jakobs, K. H.,
Schultz, G.
(1983)
J. Biol. Chem.
258,
2960-2965
[Free Full Text]
-
Tang, W.-J.,
Stanzel, M.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1995)
Biochemistry
34,
14563-14572
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Taussig, R.,
Quarmby, L. M.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
9-12
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tang, W.-J.,
Krupinski, J.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
8595-8603
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Feinstein, P. G.,
Schrader, K. A.,
Bakalyar, H. A.,
Tang, W.-J.,
Krupinski, J.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Reed, R. R.
(1991)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
88,
10173-10177
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vorherr, T.,
Knopfel, L.,
Hofmann, F.,
Mollner, S.,
Pfeuffer, T.,
Carafoli, E.
(1993)
Biochemistry
32,
6081-6088
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wu, Z.,
Wong, S. T.,
Storm, D. R.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
23766-23768
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Levin, L. R.,
Reed, R. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
7573-7579
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tang, W.-J.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1991)
Science
254,
1500-1503
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wayman, G. A.,
Impey, S.,
Wu, Z. L.,
Kindsvogel, W.,
Prichard, L.,
Storm, D. R.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
25400-25405
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chen, J.,
Devivo, M.,
Dingus, J.,
Harry, A.,
Li, J.,
Sui, J.,
Carty, D.
J.,
Blank, J. L.,
Exton, J. H.,
Stoffel, R. H.,
Inglese, J.,
Lefkowitz, R. J.,
Logothetis, D. E.,
Hildebrandt, J. D.,
Iyengar, R.
(1995)
Science
268,
1166-1169
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Graziano, M. P.,
Freissmuth, M.,
Gilman, A. G.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
409-418
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Johnson, R. A.,
Yeung, S.-M. H.,
Stübner, D.,
Bushfield, M.,
Shoshani, I.
(1989)
Mol. Pharmacol.
35,
681-688
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Florio, V. A.,
Ross, E. M.
(1983)
Mol. Pharmacol.
24,
195-202
[Abstract]
-
Weinryb, I.,
Michel, I. M.
(1974)
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
334,
218-225
-
Wolff, J.,
Londos, C.
(1978)
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
191,
161-168
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Johnson, R. A.,
Shoshani, I.
(1990)
J. Biol. Chem.
265,
11595-11600
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Segel, I. H.
(1968)
Biochemical Calculations
, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
-
Insel, P. A.,
Maguire, M. E.,
Gilman, A. G.,
Bourne, H. R.,
Coffino, P.,
Melmon, K. L.
(1976)
Mol. Pharmacol.
12,
1062-1069
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cali, J. J.,
Zwaagstra, J. C.,
Mons, N.,
Cooper, D. M. F.,
Krupinski, J.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12190-12195
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hellevuo, K.,
Yoshimura, M.,
Mons, N.,
Hoffman, P. L.,
Cooper, D. M. F.,
Tabakoff, B.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
11581-11589
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Watson, P. A.,
Krupinski, J.,
Kempinski, A. M.,
Frankenfield, C. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
28893-28898
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Reddy, R.,
Smith, D.,
Wayman, G.,
Wu, Z.,
Villacres, E. C.,
Storm, D. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
14340-14346
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Prasain, M. Alexeyev, R. Balczon, and T. Stevens
Soluble adenylyl cyclase-dependent microtubule disassembly reveals a novel mechanism of endothelial cell retraction
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol,
July 1, 2009;
297(1):
L73 - L83.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. D. Townsend, P. M. Holliday, S. Fenyk, K. C. Hess, M. A. Gray, D. R. W. Hodgson, and M. J. Cann
Stimulation of Mammalian G-protein-responsive Adenylyl Cyclases by Carbon Dioxide
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 9, 2009;
284(2):
784 - 791.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Willoughby and D. M. F. Cooper
Organization and Ca2+ Regulation of Adenylyl Cyclases in cAMP Microdomains
Physiol Rev,
July 1, 2007;
87(3):
965 - 1010.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Fischmeister
Is cAMP Good or Bad?: Depends on Where It's Made
Circ. Res.,
March 17, 2006;
98(5):
582 - 584.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. L. Sayner, M. Alexeyev, C. W. Dessauer, and T. Stevens
Soluble Adenylyl Cyclase Reveals the Significance of cAMP Compartmentation on Pulmonary Microvascular Endothelial Cell Barrier
Circ. Res.,
March 17, 2006;
98(5):
675 - 681.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Diel, K. Klass, B. Wittig, and C. Kleuss
G{beta}{gamma} Activation Site in Adenylyl Cyclase Type II: ADENYLYL CYCLASE TYPE III IS INHIBITED BY G{beta}{gamma}
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 6, 2006;
281(1):
288 - 294.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-C. Mou, A. Gille, D. A. Fancy, R. Seifert, and S. R. Sprang
Structural Basis for the Inhibition of Mammalian Membrane Adenylyl Cyclase by 2 '(3')-O-(N-Methylanthraniloyl)-guanosine 5 '-Triphosphate
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 25, 2005;
280(8):
7253 - 7261.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Salim, S. Sinnarajah, J. H. Kehrl, and C. W. Dessauer
Identification of RGS2 and Type V Adenylyl Cyclase Interaction Sites
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 25, 2003;
278(18):
15842 - 15849.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. K. Sunahara and R. Taussig
Isoforms of Mammalian Adenylyl Cyclase: Multiplicities of Signaling
Mol. Interv.,
June 1, 2002;
2(3):
168 - 184.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Zambon, R. J. Hughes, J. G. Meszaros, J. J. Wu, B. Torres, L. L. Brunton, and P. A. Insel
P2Y2 receptor of MDCK cells: cloning, expression, and cell-specific signaling
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
December 1, 2000;
279(6):
F1045 - F1052.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Defer, M. Best-Belpomme, and J. Hanoune
Tissue specificity and physiological relevance of various isoforms of adenylyl cyclase
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol,
September 1, 2000;
279(3):
F400 - F416.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Ostrom, C. Gregorian, and P. A. Insel
Cellular Release of and Response to ATP as Key Determinants of the Set-Point of Signal Transduction Pathways
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 14, 2000;
275(16):
11735 - 11739.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. U. Linder, T. Hoffmann, U. Kurz, and J. E. Schultz
A Guanylyl Cyclase from Paramecium with 22 Transmembrane Spans. EXPRESSION OF THE CATALYTIC DOMAINS AND FORMATION OF CHIMERAS WITH THE CATALYTIC DOMAINS OF MAMMALIAN ADENYLYL CYCLASES
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 6, 2000;
275(15):
11235 - 11240.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Doronin, L. Murray, C. W. Dessauer, and R. A. Johnson
Covalent Labeling of Adenylyl Cyclase Cytosolic Domains with gamma -Methylimidazole-2',5'-dideoxy-[gamma -32P]3'-ATP and the Mechanism for P-site-mediated Inhibition
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 3, 1999;
274(49):
34745 - 34750.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Wittpoth, K. Scholich, Y. Yigzaw, T. M. Stringfield, and T. B. Patel
Regions on adenylyl cyclase that are necessary for inhibition of activity by beta gamma and Gialpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins
PNAS,
August 17, 1999;
96(17):
9551 - 9556.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-S. Myung, H. Yasuda, W. W. Liu, T. K. Harden, and J. C. Garrison
Role of Isoprenoid Lipids on the Heterotrimeric G Protein gamma Subunit in Determining Effector Activation
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 4, 1999;
274(23):
16595 - 16603.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Doronin, C. Dessauer, and R. A. Johnson
Direct Photoaffinity Labeling of Individual Cytosolic Domains of Adenylyl Cyclase by [32P]2'-deoxy-3'-AMP and [alpha -32P]5'-ATP
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 4, 1998;
273(49):
32416 - 32420.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Dessauer, J. J. G. Tesmer, S. R. Sprang, and A. G. Gilman
Identification of a Gialpha Binding Site on Type V Adenylyl Cyclase
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 2, 1998;
273(40):
25831 - 25839.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Desaubry and R. A. Johnson
Adenine Nucleoside 3'-Tetraphosphates Are Novel and Potent Inhibitors of Adenylyl Cyclases
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 18, 1998;
273(38):
24972 - 24977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W.-J. Tang and J. H. Hurley
Catalytic Mechanism and Regulation of Mammalian Adenylyl Cyclases
Mol. Pharmacol.,
August 1, 1998;
54(2):
231 - 240.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Toya, C. Schwencke, J. Couet, M. P. Lisanti, and Y. Ishikawa
Inhibition of Adenylyl Cyclase by Caveolin Peptides
Endocrinology,
April 1, 1998;
139(4):
2025 - 2031.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-Z. Yan, Z.-H. Huang, R. K. Andrews, and W.-J. Tang
Conversion of Forskolin-Insensitive to Forskolin-Sensitive (Mouse-Type IX) Adenylyl Cyclase
Mol. Pharmacol.,
February 1, 1998;
53(2):
182 - 187.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. J. Tesmer, R. K. Sunahara, A. G. Gilman, and S. R. Sprang
Crystal Structure of the Catalytic Domains of Adenylyl Cyclase in a Complex with Gs ·GTP S
Science,
December 12, 1997;
278(5345):
1907 - 1916.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Dessauer and A. G. Gilman
The Catalytic Mechanism of Mammalian Adenylyl Cyclase. EQUILIBRIUM BINDING AND KINETIC ANALYSIS OF P-SITE INHIBITION
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 31, 1997;
272(44):
27787 - 27795.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Scholich, C. Wittpoth, A. J. Barbier, J. B. Mullenix, and T. B. Patel
Identification of an intramolecular interaction between small regions in type V adenylyl cyclase that influences stimulation of enzyme activity by Gsalpha
PNAS,
September 2, 1997;
94(18):
9602 - 9607.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. K. Sunahara, C. W. Dessauer, R. E. Whisnant, C. Kleuss, and A. G. Gilman
Interaction of Gsalpha with the Cytosolic Domains of Mammalian Adenylyl Cyclase
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 1997;
272(35):
22265 - 22271.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. W. Dessauer, T. T. Scully, and A. G. Gilman
Interactions of Forskolin and ATP with the Cytosolic Domains of Mammalian Adenylyl Cyclase
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 29, 1997;
272(35):
22272 - 22277.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. S. Murthy and G. M. Makhlouf
Differential Coupling of Muscarinic m2 and m3 Receptors to Adenylyl Cyclases V/VI in Smooth Muscle. CONCURRENT m2-MEDIATED INHIBITION VIA Galpha i3 AND m3-MEDIATED STIMULATION VIA Gbeta gamma q
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 22, 1997;
272(34):
21317 - 21324.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-Z. Yan, Z.-H. Huang, V. D. Rao, J. H. Hurley, and W.-J. Tang
Three Discrete Regions of Mammalian Adenylyl Cyclase Form a Site for Gsalpha Activation
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 25, 1997;
272(30):
18849 - 18854.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-Z. Yan, Z.-H. Huang, R. S. Shaw, and W.-J. Tang
The Conserved Asparagine and Arginine Are Essential for Catalysis of Mammalian Adenylyl Cyclase
J. Biol. Chem.,
May 9, 1997;
272(19):
12342 - 12349.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Ishikawa and C. J. Homcy
The Adenylyl Cyclases as Integrators of Transmembrane Signal Transduction
Circ. Res.,
March 1, 1997;
80(3):
297 - 304.
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S.-Z. Yan, J. A. Beeler, Y. Chen, R. K. Shelton, and W.-J. Tang
The Regulation of Type 7 Adenylyl Cyclase by Its C1b Region and Escherichia coli Peptidylprolyl Isomerase, SlyD
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 9, 2001;
276(11):
8500 - 8506.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. A. Parent, J. Borleis, and P. N. Devreotes
Regulation of Adenylyl Cyclases by a Region Outside the Minimally Functional Cytoplasmic Domains
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 4, 2002;
277(2):
1354 - 1360.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|