Advertisement
JBC

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staels, B.
Right arrow Articles by Auwerx, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Staels, B.
Right arrow Articles by Auwerx, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 29, Issue of July 19, 1996 pp. 17425-17432
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Expression and Regulation of the Lipoprotein Lipase Gene in Human Adrenal Cortex*

(Received for publication, December 1, 1996, and in revised form, April 22, 1996)

Bart Staels Dagger , Geneviève Martin , Monica Martinez §, Caroline Albert , Julia Peinado-Onsurbe par , Régis Saladin , Dean W. Hum , Manuel Reina §, Senen Vilaro § and Johan Auwerx ''

From U.325 INSERM, Département d'Athérosclérose, Institut Pasteur, 1 Rue Calmette, 59019 Lille, France, the § Department of Cell Biology, University of Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal 645, Barcelona (08028), Spain, the par  Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Barcelona, Spain, and the  Laboratoire d'Endocrinologie Moléculaire, Le Centre Hospitalier de l'Université Laval, 2705 Blvd. Laurier, Québec, G1V 4G2 Canada

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL), an enzyme which hydrolyzes triglycerides and participates in the catabolism of remnant lipoproteins, plays a crucial role in energy and lipid metabolism. The goal of this study was to analyze the expression and regulation of the LPL gene in human adrenals. Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequence analysis demonstrated the presence of LPL mRNA in fetal and adult human adrenal cortex. Furthermore, the human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line, NCI-H295, expresses LPL mRNA and protein, which is localized to the outer cellular membrane as demonstrated by immunofluorescence confocal microscopy and can be released in the medium by heparin addition. To asses whether the LPL gene is regulated by agents regulating adrenal steroidogenesis, NCI-H295 cells were treated with activators of second messenger systems. Whereas the calcium-ionophore A23187 did not affect LPL gene expression, treatment with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate decreased LPL mRNA levels in a time- and dose-dependent manner. This decrease after phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate was associated with diminished heparin-releasable LPL mass and activity in the culture medium. Addition of the cAMP analog 8-Br-cAMP to NCI-H295 cells resulted in a rapid, but transient dose-dependent induction of LPL mRNA. Treatment with the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide gradually induced, whereas simultaneous addition of cAMP and cycloheximide superinduced LPL mRNA levels. Nuclear run-on analysis indicated that the effects of cAMP and cycloheximide occurred at the transcriptional and post-transcriptional level, respectively. Transient co-transfection assays demonstrated that the first 230 base pairs of the proximal LPL promoter contain a cAMP-responsive element activated by protein kinase A and transcription factors belonging to the CREB/CREM family. These data indicate that LPL is expressed in human adrenal cortex and regulated in NCI-H295 adrenocortical carcinoma cells by activators of the protein kinase A and protein kinase C second messenger pathways in a manner comparable to P450scc, which catalyzes the first step in adrenal steroidogenesis. These observations suggest a role for LPL in adrenal energy and/or lipid metabolism and possibly in steroidogenesis.


INTRODUCTION

The adrenal cortex is the major site of the biosynthesis of steroid hormones, such as glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids (for review, see Ref. 1). Adrenal steroidogenesis is controlled by the action of specific peptide hormones (2). In the adrenal cortex, glucocorticoid synthesis is stimulated by the anterior pituitary-derived adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH),1 which, after binding to a specific cell surface receptor, activates adenylate cyclase, resulting in elevated intracellular cAMP concentrations and activation of the protein kinase A (PKA) signal transduction pathway (2). Mineralocorticoid synthesis, on the other hand, is induced by angiotensin-II, which activates the protein kinase C (PKC) pathway of intracellular second messengers. The first step in the enzymatic conversion of cholesterol into steroid hormones is catalyzed by the mitochondrial cytochrome P450 side chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc), which catalyzes the conversion of cholesterol into pregnenolone. Long term regulation of steroidogenesis by these peptide hormones occurs via changes in P450scc gene expression and transcription (3, 4, 5). Human adrenals derive the cholesterol necessary for steroid hormone synthesis mainly by receptor-mediated endocytosis of low density lipoproteins (LDL) and, to a lesser extent, by de novo synthesis, the rate-limiting step of which is catalyzed by the enzyme 3-hydroxy 3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (6, 7, 8). Although patients homozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia have a mild impairment in cortisol secretion during maximal ACTH stimulation (9), the absence of adrenal dysfunction in patients with defects in the LDL-receptor pathway treated with hydroxy 3-methylglutaryl-coA reductase inhibitors, such as mevinolin, suggested the existence of alternative pathways of cholesterol delivery to the adrenal for steroid synthesis (10).

Lipoprotein lipase (LPL) occupies a pivotal position in both lipoprotein and energy metabolism. Located as a homodimer on the capillary endothelium of tissues, LPL hydrolyzes triglycerides in chylomicrons and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles using apoC-II as a co-factor (11). The released free fatty acids are taken up by the underlying tissue for oxidation to generate ATP (muscle), for storage (adipose tissue), or for secretion in milk (mammary gland). In addition to its lipolytic activity on triglyceride-rich lipoprotein particles, LPL functions as a ligand for the VLDL receptor (12), the LDL receptor-related protein (13), and the LDL receptor (14, 15, 16), implicating a role for LPL in the uptake of cholesterol-rich remnant particles (for review, see Ref. 17). The cDNA (18), genomic structure (19, 20), and chromosomal location (chromosome 8 (21)) of the human LPL gene have been determined. LPL is expressed in a number of differentiated tissues, such as adipocytes, macrophages, lactating mammary gland, and muscle (for review, see Ref. 11). In contrast, in liver LPL is only expressed in fetal and neonatal liver and becomes extinguished 3 weeks after birth (22, 23).

In view of the pivotal role of LPL both in energy and lipoprotein metabolism, the main objective of the current investigation was to analyze whether LPL is expressed in the human adrenal cortex, a major cholesterol metabolizing tissue. Our results demonstrate the presence of LPL mRNA both in fetal and adult adrenal cortex. Furthermore, LPL is expressed in the recently characterized human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line, NCI-H295 (24, 25), where it is located on the plasma membrane and can be released by heparin treatment. LPL expression in NCI-H295 cells is regulated by cAMP and phorbol esters, activators of the PKA and PKC second messenger pathways, respectively, in a manner reminiscent of the regulation of the rate-limiting enzyme in adrenal steroidogenesis, P450scc. These data therefore suggest a role for LPL in adrenal energy and lipoprotein metabolism.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Materials

Cycloheximide (CHX), transferrin, selenium, insulin and Hepes were obtained from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany) and fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin, dithiothreitol, sucrose, PIPES, glycerol trioleate, 8-Br-cAMP, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA), and the calcium ionophore, A-23187, from Sigma. Superscript reverse transcriptase and cell culture media were from Life Technologies (Gaithersburg, MD). Glycerol tri-[9,10-(n)-3H]oleate was obtained from Amersham International and [alpha -32P]dCTP, [alpha -32P]UTP, and [3H]chloramphenicol from ICN Nucleotides (Costa Mesa, CA).

Cell Culture

Human monocyte THP-1, hepatoblastoma HepG2, choriocarcinoma JEG-3, and adrenocortical carcinoma NCI-H295 cells were obtained from the ATCC. NCI-H295, THP-1, JEG-3, and HepG2 cell cultures were maintained exactly as described previously (24, 26, 27). PMA and A-23187, dissolved in acetone, and 8-Br-cAMP and CHX, dissolved in sterile H20, were added to the medium at the indicated concentrations and for the indicated periods of time. Control cells received vehicle only. In experiments for LPL protein and activity determination, heparin was added to the culture medium at a concentration of 100 milliunits/ml.

Tissue and Cell RNA Extraction and Analysis

Human total fetal adrenals were dissected free and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Care was taken not to contaminate the samples with adipose tissue. Human adult adrenals were harvested and the tissue layer enriched in fasciculata cells was prepared as described previously (28). Briefly, adipose tissue was carefully removed from the adrenal gland using scissors and thin tissue slices of the fasciculata layer were obtained using a Stadie-Riggs tissue slicer. Total cellular RNA was prepared by the guanidinium isothiocyanate/cesium chloride procedure (tissues) or by the acid guanidinium thiocyanate/phenol-chloroform method (cell cultures) (29, 30). Poly(A+) RNA was subsequently prepared using Poly(A)Quik push columns (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). For analysis of LPL expression in adult and fetal adrenal and NCI-H295 cells, total RNA (50 ng) was reverse transcribed using random hexamer primers and Superscript reverse transcriptase. LPL mRNA was subsequently PCR amplified (35 cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, 1 min at 57 °C, 1 min at 72 °C) using as primers the sense oligo GCA AGC TTG GTA CCA ATG GAG AGC AAA GCC CTG (containing HindIII/KpnI cloning sites) and the antisense oligo TAC ATT CCT GTT ACC GTC CAG CCA TGG ATC (containing a NcoI cloning site), yielding a fragment of the expected size of 277 bp (18). This fragment spans exons 1 and 2 of the human LPL gene (19), which excludes potential contamination of the RNA samples with genomic DNA. RNA from HepG2 and differentiated THP-1 cells were simultaneously amplified as negative and positive controls for LPL expression, respectively (26, 27). GAPDH-specific primers (sense primer: TGA TGA CAT CAA GAA GGT GGT GAA G; antisense primer: TCC TTG GAG GCC ATG TGG GCC AT) were used as control for the RT-PCR reaction (expected fragment size: 239 bp) (31). The resulting products were separated on a 2% agarose gel and subsequently subcloned into the pUC19 plasmid vector. Sequence analysis revealed complete identity to the previously reported human LPL cDNA sequence (18).

Northern and dot blot hybridizations of total cellular RNA and poly(A+) RNA were performed as described previously (23) using the human LPL cDNA clone, pHLPL-26, as a probe (26). The human P450scc cDNA probe was prepared by RT-PCR amplification based on the published sequence (32). A GAPDH probe was used as a control probe (31). All cDNA probes were labeled by random primed labeling (Boehringer Mannheim). Filters were hybridized to 1.5 × 106 cpm/ml of each probe as described (23). They were washed once in 0.5 × SSC and 0.1% SDS for 10 min at room temperature and twice for 30 min at 65 °C and subsequently exposed to x-ray film (X-Omat-AR, Kodak). Autoradiograms were analyzed by quantitative scanning densitometry (Bio-Rad GS670 Densitometer) as described (23).

Isolation of Nuclei and Transcriptional Rate Assay

Nuclei were prepared from NCI-H295 cells treated with 8-Br-cAMP (300 µM), CHX (10 µg/ml), both 8-Br-cAMP and CHX, or vehicle and transcription run-on assays were performed as described by Nevins (33). Equivalent counts of nuclear RNA labeled with [alpha -32P]UTP (3000 Ci/mmol) were hybridized for 36 h at 42 °C to 5 µg of LPL, P450scc, GAPDH, and vector DNA (pBluescript) immobilized on Hybond-C Extra filters (Amersham). After hybridization, filters were washed at room temperature for 10 min in 0.5 × SSC and 0.1% SDS and twice for 30 min at 65 °C and subsequently exposed to x-ray film (X-Omat-AR, Kodak). Quantitative analysis was performed by scanning densitometry (Bio-Rad GS670 densitometer).

Transient Transfection Experiments

Cloning of the human LPL gene promoter and construction of the LPL gene promoter CAT vectors were previously described (19, 34). The different 5' LPL promoter deletions were subcloned in a luciferase expression vector and were kindly provided by Dr. S. Deeb. The expression vectors pSG5-CREB and pSG5-CREMtau were a kind gift from Dr. P. Sassone-Corsi, and the PKA expression vectors were a kind gift from Dr. S. Mc Knight. NCI-H295 and JEG-3 cells were transfected in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's minimal essential medium by the calcium phosphate co-precipitation procedure with a mixture of plasmids, which contained in addition to the reporter (3 µg) and expression vector(s) (1 µg), a cytomegalovirus driven beta -galactosidase vector used as an internal control for transfection efficiency. All samples were complemented to an equal total amount of plasmid DNA using empty pSG5 plasmid vector. After 8 h of incubation cells were changed to fresh medium for another 16 h and cells were subsequently treated with 8-Br-cAMP (300 µM) or solvent for a further 6 h. CAT and luciferase activities were determined on cell extracts as described (35, 36).

LPL Mass and Activity Assays

LPL mass was determined by a solid phase sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using a chicken polyclonal antibody against LPL for coating and the 5D2 monoclonal antibody for detection as described (37). LPL activity was determined by the method of Ramirez et al. (38) with minor modifications. The assay mixture contained 0.6 mM glycerol tri-[9,10-(n)-3H]oleate (12 Ci/mol), 50 mM MgCl2, 0.05% fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin, 3% rat serum (preheated for 30 min at 56 °C), 25 mM PIPES (pH 7.5), and 0.02 ml of sample in a final volume of 0.2 ml. After incubation for 30 min at 25 °C, the reaction was stopped and [3H]oleate was separated from the substrate and quantified as described previously (39). The amount of enzyme catalyzing the release of 1 µmol/min of oleate is defined as 1 unit.

Western Blotting

To obtain NCI-H295 cell extracts, cells were lysed in a buffer containing 1% (w/v) Triton X-100, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 unit/ml aprotinin (Sigma) in phosphate-buffered saline. The lysed cells were scraped, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and sonicated for 30 s at maximum potency. Next, the extract was centrifuged 10 min at 13,000 rpm in an Hereaus Biofuge A centrifuge at 4 °C. The supernatant (20 µl) was loaded onto a SDS-polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, the gel was blotted to nitrocellulose (Schleicher and Schuell, Dassel, Germany) at 15 volts for 1 h using the semi-dry system (Bio-Rad). LPL was detected with 10 µg/ml monoclonal antibody against bovine LPL (5D2) (Oncogene, Uniondal, NY) and a secondary peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse antibody at a dilution 1/2000 (Dakopatts, Glostrup, Denmark). The blot was developed with the ECL system from Amersham. As controls, purified bovine LPL (kindly provided by Dr. Gunilla Olivecrona, University of Umeå, Sweden) and cell extracts of COS1 cells transfected with the full-length human LPL cDNA were used (40).

Immunofluorescence and Confocal Microscopy

For immunofluorescence, cells, grown on glass coverslips, were rinsed briefly in phosphate-buffered saline, fixed with methanol (-20 °C) for 2 min, washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline, incubated with a polyclonal antibody against human LPL, and detected using fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated swine anti-rabbit immunoglobulins as described (40). Preimmune rabbit antibodies were used as negative controls. For confocal microscopy studies a Leica TCS 4D (Leica Lasertechnik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) confocal scanning laser microscope adapted to an inverted Leitz DMIRBE microscope was used. Relative intensity analysis was made using the Leica TCS software.

Flow Cytometry

For flow cytometry NCI-H295 cells were fixed with ethanol (-20 °C) for 2 min, washed twice in phosphate-buffered saline, and processed in suspension with the same primary and secondary antibodies used for immunofluorescence. Flow cytometry was done on an Epics Elite flow cytometer (Coulter Electronics Corporation, Hialeah, FL). Excitation was done using a standard 488 nm air-cooled argon-ion laser at 15 milliwatts power. The instrument was set up with the standard configuration. Forward scatter, side scatter, green fluorescence (525 nm BP filter) from fluorescein isothiocyanate, and time were measured. Optical alignment was based on optimized signal from 10-nm fluorescent beads (Immunocheck, Coulter Corp.).


RESULTS

LPL Is Expressed in Human Fetal Adrenal, Human Adult Adrenal Cortex, and the Adrenocortical Carcinoma Cell Line, NCI-H295

To determine whether the LPL gene is expressed in the human adrenal, RNA was extracted from human fetal total adrenal and analyzed by RT-PCR amplification using LPL-specific primers. RT-PCR amplification yielded a DNA fragment of the expected size of 277 bp (18), indicating the presence of LPL mRNA in human fetal adrenal (Fig. 1, A and B). A fragment of similar size was obtained after RT-PCR amplification of RNA from the human monocyte cell line, THP-1, which expresses the LPL gene when differentiated into macrophages by phorbol ester treatment (26) (Fig. 1A). By contrast, no amplification product was obtained using RNA from the human hepatoma cell line, HepG2, which does not express the LPL gene (27) (Fig. 1A). As a control, GAPDH mRNA could be detected in all cell lines and tissues examined (Fig. 1, A and B).


Fig. 1. The human LPL gene is expressed in fetal adrenal, adult adrenal cortex, and in the adrenocortical carcinoma cell line, NCI-H295. A and B, total RNA (50 ng) isolated from human fetal adrenal, adult adrenal cortex, and NCI-H295 cells was reverse transcribed and PCR-amplified as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' RNA from HepG2 and differentiated THP-1 cells was simultaneously amplified as negative and positive controls of LPL expression, respectively. The size of the molecular weight markers in bp is indicated on the left. Mix only, RT-PCR reaction performed without addition of RNA. C, Northern blot analysis of poly(A+) RNA isolated from NCI-H295 cells. Extraction of poly(A+) RNA, Northern blot analysis (5 µg), and hybridization were performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' The arrows indicate the 3 different LPL mRNA species detected. To determine the location of the 28 S and 18 S ribosomal RNA bands (indicated on the right) total RNA (20 µg) from NCI-H295 cells was run in parallel on the same gel.

To determine whether LPL is expressed in the steroid-synthesizing part of the adrenal, RNA was prepared from adult adrenal cortex. RT-PCR analysis demonstrated the presence of LPL mRNA in the human adrenal cortex. Similarly to human adrenal cortex, LPL mRNA could be detected by RT-PCR analysis in the recently characterized human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line, NCI-H295, which actively synthesizes the major adrenal steroids (24) (Fig. 1, A and B). Furthermore, Northern blot analysis of NCI-H295 poly(A+) RNA revealed the existence of three distinct LPL mRNA species (Fig. 1C). In contrast to THP-1 cell LPL mRNA (41), however, the largest LPL mRNA species was clearly the most abundant form in NCI-H295 cells. The resulting PCR products from human adrenal and NCI-H295 cells were cloned in pBluescript and sequence analysis revealed complete identity to the previously published human LPL cDNA (not shown) (18), thereby confirming that LPL is present both in human fetal and adult adrenal cortex and in NCI-H295 cells.

To detect whether LPL protein was present in NCI-H295 cells, three different immunochemical approaches were used. By Western blot analysis of total cell extracts using a specific monoclonal antibody against bovine LPL (5D2) a single band of an apparent molecular mass of 58-60 kDa was detected (Fig. 2A). The electrophoretic mobility of this band was identical to human LPL produced in COS1 cells transfected with the human LPL cDNA and was slightly higher when compared to LPL purified from bovine milk. To identify the cellular distribution of LPL in NCI-H295 cells, immunofluorescence analysis using polyclonal antibodies against human LPL was performed (Fig. 2B). Confocal microscopy analysis of immunofluorescence experiments revealed that LPL staining in NCI-H295 cells was intense and preferentially located in the cell periphery (Fig. 2B), suggesting that at least part of the detected LPL is bound to the cell surface. Parallel experiments using paraformaldehyde-fixed and non-permeabilized cells (not shown), indicated that LPL immunostaining could be detected on the surface of NCI-H295 cells. Flow cytometry analysis of the cell population incubated with the same antibodies used in immunofluorescence experiments further confirmed the presence of LPL in NCI-H295 cells (Fig. 2C).


Fig. 2. Immunochemical detection of LPL in NCI-H295 cells. A, Western blot of purified bovine LPL (0.25 µg) (55 kDa) (lane 1) and cell extracts (25 µg of protein/lane) from NCI-H295 cells (lane 2) and COS1 cells transfected with a human LPL expression vector (58 kDa) (lane 3). SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting using monoclonal anti-bovine LPL (5D2) were performed as indicated under ``Experimental Procedures.'' B, immunofluorescence detection of LPL in NCI-H295 cells by confocal microscopy. Cells were fixed and incubated with polyclonal antibodies against human LPL (left panel) or preimmune serum as a control (right panel) and stained with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated swine anti-rabbit immunoglobulins. Experimental conditions were identical for both primary antibodies. C, flow cytometry analysis of LPL in NCI-H295 cells. Cells were immunostained with rabbit anti-human LPL (left panel) or with preimmune serum (right panel) and fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibodies. The x axis displays fluorescence relative intensities. Note the shift of fluorescence intensity maximum (arrow) displayed by NCI-H295 cells incubated with anti-human LPL antibodies.

To determine whether LPL is secreted by NCI-H295 cells, LPL activity and mass were determined next in the cell culture medium. LPL activity in the medium increased gradually during a 24-h incubation period (Fig. 3A). This increase was most pronounced when NCI-H295 cells were incubated in the presence of heparin (Fig. 3A), which releases LPL from binding to the cell surface heparin sulfate-proteoglycans and protects it from degradation in the cell culture medium (11). In addition, heparin treatment resulted in the appearance of detectable LPL immunoreactivity in the cell culture medium (Fig. 3B). In the absence of heparin LPL mass was undetectable in the medium, which is most likely due to the lower sensitivity of the mass determination by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay compared to the LPL activity assay (Fig. 3B).


Fig. 3. LPL activity and mass in culture medium from NCI-H295 cells. NCI-H295 cells were incubated at 37 °C with (+) or without (-) heparin (100 milliunits/ml) for the indicated periods of time. Medium (1 ml/150,000 cells) was collected and LPL activity (A) and mass (B) were determined as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Values (n = 3 per time point) are expressed as the mean ± S.D.

LPL mRNA Is Regulated by Phorbol Ester, but Not by Calcium Ionophore

To examine LPL regulation by activators of the angiotensin-II signal transduction pathway, which modulates the expression of steroidogenic enzymes, NCI-H295 cells were treated with the phorbol ester PMA, an activator of the PKC second messenger pathway, and the calcium ionophore, A-23187, which mobilizes intracellular calcium. Similarly to P450scc (24), which catalyzes the first step in adrenal steroidogenesis, PMA treatment resulted in a time-dependent decrease in LPL mRNA levels, which was already apparent after 6 h and reached a nadir after 12 h of treatment (Fig. 4A). Furthermore, this decrease in LPL mRNA after PMA was dose-dependent (Fig. 4B). Under these conditions, GAPDH mRNA levels did not change significantly, thereby confirming our previous observations (24). The decrease in LPL mRNA levels after PMA was followed at 24 and 48 h after PMA by a decreased LPL activity (Fig. 5A) and secretion of LPL protein (Fig. 5B) in the cell culture medium. In contrast to treatment with PMA, addition of the calcium ionophore A-23187 did not change significantly LPL mRNA levels when compared to GAPDH mRNA (data not shown).


Fig. 4. Effects of phorbol ester on LPL mRNA in NCI-H295 cells. A, time-dependent effects of PMA on LPL mRNA levels. NCI-H295 cells were incubated with 100 ng/ml PMA for the indicated periods of time. RNA was isolated and analyzed by Northern blot analysis as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Values (n = 3 per time point) are expressed as the mean ± S.D. B, dose-dependent effects of PMA on LPL mRNA levels. Cells were treated with the indicated doses of PMA for 24 h, RNA was isolated, and analyzed by Northern blot hybridization as indicated under ``Experimental Procedures.''


Fig. 5. Effects of phorbol ester on LPL activity and mass in culture medium of NCI-H295 cells. NCI-H295 cells were incubated with PMA (100 ng/ml) or vehicle (dimethyl sulfoxide, 1:1000 (v/v); Control) in the presence of heparin (100 milliunits/ml) for the indicated periods of time. Medium (5 ml/300,000 cells) was collected and LPL activity (A) and mass (B) were determined as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Values (n = 3 per time point) are expressed as the mean ± S.D.

Regulation of LPL Gene Expression by cAMP

Next, it was examined whether LPL mRNA levels are regulated by cAMP, an activator of the PKA signal transduction pathway which mediates the adrenal response to ACTH. When NCI-H295 cells were incubated with the cAMP analog, 8-Br-cAMP, LPL mRNA levels increased rapidly (within 3 h) by 3-fold, but this induction was transient, already decreasing after 12 h and reaching baseline values within 24 h after addition of 8-Br-cAMP (Fig. 6A). When NCI-H295 cells were treated with the protein synthesis inhibitor, CHX, LPL mRNA levels increased more gradually reaching a maximum 3-fold induction after 12-24 h (Fig. 6, A and B). Simultaneous treatment of NCI-H295 cells with 8-Br-cAMP and CHX, however, resulted in a tremendous superinduction of LPL mRNA levels leading to an approximately 8-fold increase within 3 h and a 13-fold induction 6-12 h after treatment (Fig. 6, A and B). By contrast, the induction of P450scc mRNA by 8-Br-cAMP was comparable in the presence or absence of CHX (Fig. 6B), thereby confirming previous observations that P450scc induction by cAMP in NCI-H295 cells is independent of de novo protein synthesis (24).


Fig. 6. Kinetics of regulation of LPL mRNA by cAMP and the protein synthesis inhibitor, cycloheximide, in NCI-H295 cells. A, cells were treated with 8-Br-cAMP (300 µM), cycloheximide (CHX; 10 µg/ml), or both for the indicated periods of time. RNA was extracted and LPL and P450scc mRNA levels were measured as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Values are expressed relative to vehicle treated control at each time point. B, Northern blot from an independent experiment depicting the effects of cAMP, CHX, or both on LPL, P450scc, and GAPDH mRNA levels in NCI-H295 cells. Cells were treated for the indicated periods of time with 8-Br-cAMP (100 µM) and/or cycloheximide (10 µg/ml). RNA extractions and Northern blot hybridizations (10 µg total RNA) were performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures.''

To analyze the dose-dependence of LPL mRNA induction by cAMP, NCI-H295 cells were treated with different doses of 8-Br-cAMP and harvested after 6 h, the optimal time point for cAMP induction of LPL gene expression (Fig. 6A). The induction of LPL mRNA by 8-Br-cAMP was clearly dose-dependent, being maximal at a dose of 1000 µM (Fig. 7). A similar dose-dependent effect of 8-Br-cAMP was observed on P450scc mRNA levels (Fig. 7).


Fig. 7. Dose-response of LPL, P450scc, and GAPDH mRNA regulation by cAMP in NCI-H295 cells. Cells were incubated for 6 h with the indicated concentrations of 8-Br-cAMP. RNA was extracted and analyzed by dot blotting as described under ``Experimental Procedures.''

cAMP Induces LPL Gene Expression at the Transcriptional Level, Whereas CHX Acts at the Post-transcriptional Level

To study the mechanism of induction of LPL gene expression by cAMP and/or CHX, nuclear run-on experiments were performed next. LPL gene transcription rates increased when NCI-H295 cells were treated for 2 h with 8-Br-cAMP (Fig. 8). CHX alone did not affect LPL transcription and simultaneous addition of CHX and 8-Br-cAMP resulted in an induction comparable to 8-Br-cAMP alone (Fig. 8). Similarly to LPL, P450scc gene transcription increased after 8-Br-cAMP independent whether CHX was present or not (Fig. 8). When NCI-H295 cells were treated for 6 h similar results were obtained: 8-Br-cAMP, but not CHX, induced LPL gene transcription and simultaneous addition of 8-Br-cAMP and CHX resulted in an induction comparable to 8-Br-cAMP alone (data not shown). These data indicate that cAMP treatment induces LPL expression at the transcriptional level, whereas LPL expression is regulated at a post-transcriptional level by protein synthesis inhibition.


Fig. 8. Nuclear run-on analysis of the effects of cAMP and/or cycloheximide on LPL, P450scc, and GAPDH gene transcription in NCI-H295 cells. A, cells were treated with 8-Br-cAMP (300 µM) and/or cycloheximide (10 µg/ml) for 2 h. Nuclear run-on analysis was performed as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' B, autoradiograph of the transcriptional activity of the LPL, P450scc, and GAPDH genes after 2 h of treatment. BSK, pBluescript DNA control.

PKA and the Transcription Factors CREB/CREM Activate LPL Gene Promoter Transcription in the Steroidogenic Cell Lines NCI-H295 and JEG-3

In order to test whether 5'-upstream regulatory sequences in the human LPL gene mediate the inductive effects of cAMP on LPL transcription, transient transfection experiments were performed next. When NCI-H295 cells were transfected with a luciferase expression vector driven by different 5'-deletions of human LPL gene promoter, all constructs were induced to a similar extent by cAMP, indicating the presence of a cAMP-response element (CRE) in the most proximal 230 bp (AN-LUC) of the human LPL gene promoter (not shown and Fig. 9A). In order to determine the role of transcription factors of the CREB/CREM family (42, 43), which are activated after phosphorylation by PKA (44, 45), the proximal -230-bp LPL gene promoter-containing AN-LUC vector was co-transfected with the activator CREMtau (46) and/or PKA expression vectors into NCI-H295 cells. Co-transfection of CREM alone activated LPL transcription 2-fold and addition of 8-Br-cAMP (300 µM) resulted in an enhanced 5-fold induction (Fig. 9A). When a wild-type PKA expression vector alone was co-transfected LPL promoter activity was induced approximately 3-fold. Co-transfection of PKA in the presence of CREMtau activated the LPL promoter to a similar extent compared to CREMtau and cAMP (Fig. 9A). Finally, co-transfection experiments were performed in human placental choriocarcinoma JEG-3 cells, another steroidogenic cell line, in which the P450scc gene is expressed and under control of cAMP (47, 48). Although the human placenta expresses the LPL gene (49), JEG-3 cells do not contain endogenous LPL.2 Co-transfection of the -230-bp proximal LPL promoter-containing CAT vector with a wild-type PKA expression vector resulted in a small induction of CAT activity (Fig. 9B). This induction was not observed when a mutated PKA expression vector, which can no longer phosphorylate CREB/CREM, was co-transfected into these cells. Co-transfection with CREB resulted in a strong activation of the LPL promoter, which was further enhanced by wild-type PKA, but not by mutated PKA expression vector. These data indicate that transcription factors belonging to the CREB/CREM family can activate the LPL promoter in steroidogenic cells and may participate in the activation of LPL gene transcription by cAMP.


Fig. 9. Transient transfection experiments showing the induction of LPL promoter activity by cAMP, CREB/CREMtau , and PKA in steroidogenic cells. A, NCI-H295 cells were transfected with the AN-LUC luciferase expression vector driven by the -230 to +136 human LPL gene promoter (19) in the presence of CREMtau and/or PKA expression vectors as described under ``Experimental Procedures.'' Cells were harvested 6 h after treatment with 8-Br-cAMP (300 µM) or solvent and luciferase activity was measured as described (36). Values are the mean ± S.E. of 6 points. Luciferase activities are expressed in percent induction compared to untreated AN-LUC activity. B, JEG-3 cells were transfected, as described under ``Experimental Procedures,'' with the -230 to +136 human LPL gene promoter containing KS+-AN-CAT, the empty KS+-0-CAT, or the viral SV40-enhancer driven KS+-SV40-CAT plasmids in the presence of wild-type (PKA), mutant (PKA*) PKA, and/or CREB expression vectors as indicated. CAT activity was measured as described by Ref. 35.


DISCUSSION

The results from this study show that the LPL gene is expressed in human fetal and adult adrenal cortex. Previous reports have indicated the presence of LPL mRNA in rat, guinea pig, and human total adrenal glands (18, 50, 51, 52, 53). In rats, however, LPL expression was mainly confined to the adrenal medulla (52), whereas in guinea pig LPL immunoreactivity was observed in both the cortex and the medulla and more specifically in a subpopulation of lipid-filled cells (53). Our results show that LPL mRNA and protein is present in the human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line, NCI-H295, and hence suggest that in man LPL is actually produced in the steroid-producing cells of the adrenal cortex.

In the human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line, NCI-H295, LPL expression is regulated by the activation of intracellular second messenger systems, which mediate the effects of specific tropic peptide hormones on adrenal steroidogenesis. PMA-induced activation of the PKC pathway, which negatively regulates steroidogenesis in adrenal cells (54), results in a time- and dose-dependent decrease in LPL mRNA levels which is accompanied by decreased secretion of LPL mass and activity in the cell culture medium. In contrast, mobilization of intracellular calcium ion, after treatment with the calcium ionophore A-23187, does not substantially alter LPL gene expression in these cells. This regulation of LPL expression in adrenal cells is comparable to the regulation of the first enzyme in adrenal steroidogenesis, P450scc, whose mRNA levels decrease after PMA, but remain unchanged after A-23187 (24). In contrast, in the human monocytic cell line THP-1 treatment with phorbol esters, which induces a more differentiated macrophage-like phenotype, is accompanied by the induction of LPL expression at the transcriptional level (26, 41). In addition, treatment of THP-1 cells with the calcium ionophore A-23187, induced LPL mRNA levels, possibly also via activation of PKC (41). In contrast, in the mouse hepatoma cell line, BWTG3, LPL expression appears to be refractory to regulation by stimulators of PKC (27). Therefore, LPL expression appears to be differentially regulated by activators of PKC in different tissues and cell lines.

Addition of cAMP to the culture medium results in a rapid induction of LPL mRNA in NCI-H295 cells. This induction of LPL expression in adrenal cells shows some similarity to the situation in rat mesenchymal heart cells as well as in the neonatal mouse hepatoma cell line BWTG3, where LPL activity and mRNA levels are induced by activation of the cAMP signal transduction pathway (27, 55). In contrast, elevation of intracellular cAMP concentrations decreases LPL synthesis in rat and avian adipocytes (56, 57), but this decrease appears to occur at the (post)translational level (58). In the adrenal cortex, ACTH activates steroidogenesis resulting in an increased production of glucocorticoid hormones by the zona fasciculata and reticularis. By increasing adenylate cyclase activity, ACTH increases intracellular cAMP concentrations resulting in the activation of PKA. In contrast to the induction by cAMP of most steroidogenic enzymes, such as P450scc, P450c17, and P450c21 (24), this induction is only transient and LPL mRNA levels return within 12-24 h after treatment to pretreatment baseline levels. Remarkably, addition of the protein synthesis inhibitor, CHX, induces LPL mRNA levels. In contrast to P450scc, whose induction is independent of ongoing protein synthesis (this study and Ref. 24), simultaneous addition of cAMP and CHX results in a marked superinduction of LPL gene expression. These results indicate that LPL expression is under control of a labile negative regulatory protein, which represses LPL expression. A similar situation is also observed in THP-1 cells, where CHX treatment induces LPL mRNA levels and simultaneous addition of PMA and CHX results in a superinduction of LPL mRNA, albeit less pronounced compared to NCI-H295 cells (41). The results from the nuclear run-on experiments with NCI-H295 cells indicate that CHX treatment does not induce LPL gene transcription, thereby indicating that this labile negative regulatory protein regulates LPL expression at a post-transcriptional level, most likely by affecting LPL RNA stability.

The nuclear run-on experiments indicate that cAMP rapidly (within 2 h) activates LPL (and P450scc) expression at the transcriptional level. Furthermore, transient transfection assays in NCI-H295 cells suggest that the cAMP-mediated activation of LPL transcription is mediated by a cis-acting element(s) located within the first 230 bp of the proximal human LPL promoter region. Co-transfection of wild-type, but not mutated, PKA expression vector by itself is sufficient to induce LPL gene transcription in NCI-H295 cells. Although the exact nature of the cAMP-response element and the transcription factors implicated in its activation remain to be determined, our co-transfection experiments suggest a functional implication of the cAMP-response element-binding proteins of the CREM/CREB family. In addition, transient transfection experiments performed in placenta-derived choriocarcinoma JEG-3 cells, another human steroidogenic cell line, indicate that these elements are functional and can be activated by PKA and CREB in steroidogenic cells derived from other tissues. Although JEG-3 cells do not express the endogenous LPL gene,2 the P450scc gene is expressed and activated by cAMP in these cells (47).

Although the transcriptional induction of steroidogenic enzymes after cAMP treatment appears to be mediated by cAMP-dependent protein kinases (2, 54, 59), the involvement of transcription factors belonging to the CREB/CREM family is presently unclear. Purified CREB protein has been demonstrated to bind to a near-classical CRE in the P450c11beta and P450scc genes, but functional transactivation experiments have not yet been performed (60, 61, 62). Furthermore, CREB or related factors have been shown to regulate the P450c17 and P450c21 genes (63, 64). Since the transcription activation of steroidogenic enzymes has been shown to be relatively slow (several hours) in adult bovine adrenal cells (3), it has been suggested, however, that the CRE/CREB system might not be involved in the response to cAMP (65). In contrast to bovine adrenal cells, the induction of both LPL and P450scc gene transcription by cAMP in human NCI-H295 cells is rapid (within 2 h). Whether these differences are due to differences between species (human versus bovine) or cell model systems (primary adrenal cells versus adrenocortical carcinoma cells) is presently unclear, but the observations from this study suggest that the CRE/CREB system may be functionally involved in mediating the cAMP response of the LPL gene in human adrenal NCI-H295 cells. It is most likely that adrenal cortex basal and cAMP-activated gene expression requires cooperation between the classical CRE-binding proteins, CREB/CREM, different specific adrenal-enriched transcription factors, and ubiquitous transcription factors, such as Sp1, binding to cAMP-responsive elements and to adjacent sites (65). Specific adrenal-enriched transcription factors, such as NGFI-B/nur77, SF-1/Ad4BP, and DAX-1 (66, 67, 68, 69), may enhance the cAMP responsiveness of various genes involved in steroidogenesis (62, 70, 71, 72, 73). Whether these adrenal-enriched transcription factors participate in the basal and cAMP-mediated expression of the LPL gene awaits further studies.

This coordinate regulation of the LPL gene and the first enzyme of adrenal steroidogenesis, P450scc, suggests a functional role of LPL in adrenal steroidogenesis. Although the exact function of LPL in the adrenal gland cannot be deduced from this study, it is tempting to speculate about its potential role. Through its enzymatic activity, hydrolyzing triglycerides and releasing free fatty acids which can be taken up by the underlying tissue, LPL may help the cell to provide in its energy requirements. In this respect, it is interesting to note that LPL expression has been detected in (parts of) tissues displaying a high metabolic activity, such as muscle (74, 75). Alternatively, LPL may be involved in the uptake of lipoprotein cholesterol required for steroidogenesis by the adrenal gland, as has been suggested for rat adrenal cells (76). By locally increasing hydrolysis of VLDL triglycerides LPL may change the conformation of lipoprotein particles rendering them more accessible for binding to the receptors of the underlying tissue. Although the LDL receptor plays a major role in cholesterol delivery to the adrenal gland (6, 7, 8), the absence of adrenal dysfunction in patients with defects in the LDL receptor pathway upon treatment with hydroxy 3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors, has implicated the existence of alternative routes for cholesterol delivery to the adrenal (10). Separate from its enzymatic function, LPL has been shown to mediate binding of cholesterol-rich remnant lipoprotein particles to specific cell surface receptors, such as the LDL receptor-related protein, thereby mediating their uptake. In this respect, it is interesting to note that NCI-H295 cells express high levels of LDL receptor-related protein,3 which may, in part, explain the localization of LPL protein on the outer cell membrane. Finally, the fact that LPL expression is not confined to the adrenal, but is also observed in other steroidogenic tissues, such as the ovary, points to the requirement of this enzyme in other steroidogenic tissues (13).

In conclusion, these results demonstrate the presence of LPL mRNA in fetal and adult adrenal cortex and in the steroid-synthesizing adrenocortical carcinoma cells NCI-H295. In NCI-H295 cells LPL expression is regulated by cAMP and phorbol esters, activators of the PKA and PKC second messenger pathways, respectively, in a manner reminiscent of the regulation of the first enzyme in adrenal steroidogenesis, P450scc. These data therefore suggest a role for LPL in adrenal energy and lipoprotein metabolism.


FOOTNOTES

*   This word was supported in part by grants from INSERM, CNRS, Fondation pour le Recherche Médicale, the Comision Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Grant SAF-92-0897; PB94-1548), the Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias from Ministerio de Sanidad (Grant 93/0423E), and the European Community (BIOMED PL-921243). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
Dagger    Chargé de Recherche of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS). To whom correspondence should be addressed: U.325 INSERM, Département d'Athérosclérose, Institut Pasteur, 1 Rue Calmette, 59019 Lille, France. Fax: 33-20-87-73-60; Tel.: 33-20-87-73-88.
''   Directeur de Recherche of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS).
1   The abbreviations used are: ACTH, adrenocroticotropic hormone; apo, apolipoprotein; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; CHX, cycloheximide; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; LPL, lipoprotein lipase; PKA, protein kinase A; PKC, protein kinase C; PMA, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate; P450scc, cytochrome P450 side chain cleavage enzyme; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid; VLDL, very low density lipoprotein; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; bp, base pair(s); RT, reverse transcriptase; CREB, cAMP response element-binding protein(s); CREM, cAMP response element modulator.
2   B. Staels and J. Auwerx, unpublished observations.
3   B. Staels, F. van Leuven, and J. Auwerx, unpublished observations.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Delphine Cayet, David García, Susanna Castel, and Jaume Comas for their expert technical assistance and to Dr. K. Schoonjans for helpful suggestions on the transfections. Drs. S. Deeb, P. Sassone-Corsi, and S. McKnight are kindly thanked for providing the various expression vectors.


REFERENCES

  1. Miller, W. L., and Tyrrell, J. B. (1995) in The Adrenal Cortex (Felig, P., Baxter, J., and Frohman, L., eds) McGraw Hill Inc., New York
  2. Waterman, M. R., Simpson, E. R. (1989) Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 45, 533-566
  3. John, M. E., John, M. C., Boggaram, V., Simpson, E. R., Waterman, M. R. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 4715-4719 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. John, M. E., John, M. C., Ashley, P., MacDonald, R. J., Simpson, E. R., Waterman, M. R. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 5628-5632 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. DiBlasio, A. M., Voutilainen, R., Jaffe, R. B., Miller, W. L. (1988) J. Clin. Endocrinol. & Metab. 65, 170-175 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Gwynne, J. T., Strauss, J. F. (1982) Endocr. Rev. 3, 299-329 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kovanen, P. T., Faust, J. R., Brown, M. S., Goldstein, J. L. (1979) Endocrinology 104, 599-609 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Carr, B. R., Simpson, E. R. (1981) Endocr. Rev. 2, 306-326 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Illingworth, D. R., Lees, A. M., Lees, R. S. (1983) Metabolism 30, 1045
  10. Laue, L., Hoeg, J. M., Barnes, K., Loriaux, D. L., Chrousos, G. P. (1987) J. Clin. Endocrinol. & Metab. 64, 531-535 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Auwerx, J., Leroy, P., Schoonjans, K. (1992) Crit. Rev. Clin. Lab. Sci. 29, 243-268 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Takahashi, S., Suzuki, J., Kohno, M., Oida, K., Tamai, T., Miyabo, S., Yamamoto, T., Nakai, T. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 15747-15754 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Beisiegel, U., Weber, W., Bengtsson-Olivecrona, G. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 88, 8342-8346 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Mulder, M., Lombardi, P., Jansen, H., van Berkel, T. J. C., Frants, R. R., Havekes, L. M. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9369-9375 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Williams, K. J., Fless, G. M., Petrie, K. A., Snyder, M. L., Brocia, R. W., Swenson, T. L. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 13284-13292 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Rumsey, S. C., Obunike, J. C., Arad, Y., Deckelbaum, R. J., Goldberg, I. J. (1992) J. Clin. Invest. 90, 1504-1512
  17. Santamarina-Fojo, S., Dugi, K. A. (1994) Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 5, 117-125 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Wion, K. L., Kirchgessner, T. G., Lusis, A. J., Schotz, M. C., Lawn, R. M. (1987) Science 235, 1638-1641 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Deeb, S., Peng, R. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 4131-4135 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Kirchgessner, T. G., Chuat, J. C., Heinzmann, C., Etienne, J., Guilhot, S., Svenson, K., Ameis, D., Pilon, C., D'auriol, L., Andalibi, A., Schotz, M. C., Galimbert, F., Lusis, A. J. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 86, 9647-9651 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Sparkes, R. S., Zollman, S., Klisak, I., Kirchgessner, T. G., Komaromy, M. C., Mohandas, T., Schotz, M. C., Lusis, A. J. (1987) Genomics 1, 138-144 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Peinado-Onsurbe, J., Staels, B., Deeb, S., Ramirez, I., Llobera, M., Auwerx, J. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1131, 281-286 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Staels, B., Auwerx, J. (1992) Development 115, 1035-1043 [Abstract]
  24. Staels, B., Hum, D. W., Miller, W. L. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 423-433 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Gazdar, A. F., Oie, H. K., Shackleton, C. H., Chen, T. R., Triche, T. J., Myers, C. E., Chrousos, G. P., Brennan, M. F., Stein, C. A., La-Rocca, R. V. (1990) Cancer Res. 50, 5488-5496 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Auwerx, J., Deeb, S., Brunzell, J. D., Peng, R., Chait, A. (1988) Biochemistry 27, 2651-2655 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  27. Peinado-Onsurbe, J., Staels, B., Deeb, S., Auwerx, J. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 10121-10128 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Guillon, G., Trueba, M., Joubert, D., Grazzini, E., Chouinard, L., Côté, M., Payet, M. D., Manzoni, O., Barberis, C., Robert, M., Gallo-Payet, N. (1995) Endocrinology 136, 1285-1295 [Abstract]
  29. Chirgwin, J. M., Przybyla, A. E., MacDonald, R. J., Rutter, W. J. (1979) Biochemistry 18, 5294-5299 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Chomczynski, P., Sacchi, N. (1987) Anal. Biochem. 162, 156-159 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Tokunaga, K., Nakaruma, Y., Sakata, K., Fujimoro, K., Ohkubo, M., Sawada, K., Sakiyama, S. (1987) Cancer Res. 47, 5616-5619 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Chung, B., Matteson, K. J., Voutilainen, R., Mohandas, T. K., Miller, W. L. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 8962-8966 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Nevins, J. R. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152, 234-241 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Schoonjans, K., Staels, B., De Vos, P., Szpirer, J., Szpirer, C., Deeb, S., Verhoeven, G., Auwerx, J. (1993) FEBS Lett. 329, 89-95 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Gorman, C. M., Moffat, L. F., Howard, B. H. (1982) Mol. Cell. Biol. 2, 1044-1051 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. de Wet, J. R., Wood, K., DeLuca, M., Helinski, D. R., Subramani, S. (1987) Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 725-737 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Vilella, E., Joven, J., Fernandez, M., Vilaro, S., Brunzell, J. D., Olivecrona, T., Bengtsson-Olivecrona, G. (1993) J. Lipid Res. 34, 1555-1564 [Abstract]
  38. Ramirez, I., Kryski, A. J., Ben-Zeev, O., Schotz, M. C., Severson, D. L. (1985) Biochem. J. 232, 229-236 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Burgaya, F., Peinado, J., Vilaro, S., Llobera, M., Ramirez, M. (1989) Biochem. J. 259, 159-166 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Buscà, R., Pujana, M. A., Pognonec, P., Auwerx, J., Deeb, S. S., Reina, M., Vilaro, S. (1995) J. Lipid Res. 36, 939-951 [Abstract]
  41. Auwerx, J., Deeb, S., Brunzell, J. D., Wolfbauer, G., Chait, A. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 4563-4567 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  42. Habener, J. F. (1990) Mol. Endocrinol. 4, 1087-1094 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Lalli, E., Sassone-Corsi, P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 17359-17362 [Free Full Text]
  44. Gonzalez, G. A., Montminy, M. R. (1989) Cell 59, 675-680 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  45. de Groot, R. P., den Hertog, J., Vandenheede, J. R., Goris, J., Sassone-Corsi, P. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 3903-3911 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Foulkes, N. S., Mellström, B., Benusiglio, E., Sassone-Corsi, P. (1992) Nature 355, 80-84 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  47. Moore, C. C. D., Hum, D. W., Miller, W. L. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 2045-2058 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Ringler, G. E., Kao, L., Miller, W. L., Strauss, J. F. I. (1989) Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 62, 13-21 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  49. Gotoda, T., Senda, M., Gamou, T., Furuichi, Y., Oka, K. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 2351 [Free Full Text]
  50. Semenkovich, C. F., Chen, S.-H., Wims, M., Luo, C.-C., Li, W.-H., Chan, L. (1989) J. Lipid Res. 30, 423-431 [Abstract]
  51. Kirchgessner, T. G., Svenson, K. L., Lusis, A. J., Schotz, M. C. (1987) J. Biol. Chem. 262, 8463-8466 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Goldberg, I. J., Soprano, D. R., Wyatt, M. L., Vanni, T. M., Kirchgessner, T. G., Schotz, M. C. (1989) J. Lipid Res. 30, 1569-1577 [Abstract]
  53. Gafvels, M., Vilaro, S., Olivecrona, T. (1991) J. Endocrinol. 129, 213-220 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  54. Reyland, M. E. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 1021-1030 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Friedman, G., Reshef, A., Ben-Naim, M., Leitersdorf, E., Stein, O., Stein, Y. (1992) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1137, 237-241 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Knobler, H., Chajek-Shaul, T., Stein, O., Etienne, J., Stein, Y. (1984) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 795, 363-371 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  57. Bensadoun, A., Marita, R. A. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 879, 253-263 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Ong, J. M., Saffari, B., Simsolo, R. B., Kern, P. A. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 61-69 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Wong, M., Rice, D. A., Parker, K. L., Schimmer, B. P. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 12867-12871 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Honda, S.-I., Morohashi, K.-I., Omura, T. (1990) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 108, 1042-1049 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Hashimoto, T., Morohashi, K.-I., Takayama, K., Honda, S.-I., Wada, T., Handa, H., Omura, T. (1992) J. Biochem. (Tokyo) 12, 573-575
  62. Watanabe, N., Inoue, H., Fujii-Kuriyama, Y. (1994) Eur. J. Biochem. 222, 825-834 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  63. Watanabe, N., Kitazume, M., Fijisawa, J., Yoshida, M., Fujii-Kuriyama, Y. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 214, 521-531 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  64. Lund, J., Ahlgren, R., Wu, D., Kagimoto, M., Simpson, E. R., Waterman, M. R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 3304-3312 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Waterman, M. R. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27783-27786 [Free Full Text]
  66. Lala, D. S., Rice, D. A., Parker, K. L. (1992) Mol. Endocrinol. 6, 1249-1258 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Honda, S.-I., Morohashi, K., Nomura, M., Takeya, H., Kitajima, M., Omura, T. (1993) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 7494-7502 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Zanaria, E., Muscatelli, F., Bardoni, B., Strom, T. M., Guioli, S., Guo, W., Lalli, E., Moser, C., Walker, A. P., McCabe, E. R. B., Meitinger, T., Monaco, A. P., Sassone-Corsi, P., Camerino, G. (1994) Nature 372, 635-641 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  69. Muscatelli, F., Strom, T. M., Walker, A. P., Zanaria, E., Récan, D., Meindi, A., Bardoni, B., Guioli, S., Zehetner, G., Rabl, W., Schwarz, H. P., Kaplan, J.-C., Camerino, G., Meitinger, T., Monaco, A. P. (1994) Nature 372, 672-676 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Morohashi, K.-I., Zanger, U. M., Honda, S.-I., Hara, M., Waterman, M. R., Omura, T. (1993) Mol. Endocrinol. 7, 1196-1204 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Clemens, J. W., Lala, D. S., Parker, K. L., Richards, J. S. (1994) Endocrinology 134, 1499-1508 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Wilson, T. E., Mouw, A. R., Weaver, C. A., Milbrandt, J., Parker, K. L. (1993) Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 861-868 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Zhang, P., Mellon, S. H. (1996) Mol. Endocrinol. 10, 147-158 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Eckel, R. H., Robbins, R. J. (1984) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 81, 7604-7607 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  75. Chajek, T., Stein, O., Stein, Y. (1977) J. Lipid Res. 26, 549-561 [Abstract]
  76. Leitersdorf, E., Israeli, A., Stein, O., Eisenberg, S., Stein, Y. (1986) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 878, 320-329 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
L. Groussin, J. F. Massias, X. Bertagna, and J. Bertherat
Loss of Expression of the Ubiquitous Transcription Factor cAMP Response Element-Binding Protein (CREB) and Compensatory Overexpression of the Activator CREM{tau} in the Human Adrenocortical Cancer Cell Line H295R
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2000; 85(1): 345 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
S. Hall, G. Chu, G. Miller, K. Cruickshank, J. A. Cooper, S. E. Humphries, and P. J. Talmud
A Common Mutation in the Lipoprotein Lipase Gene Promoter, -93T/G, Is Associated With Lower Plasma Triglyceride Levels and Increased Promoter Activity In Vitro
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 1997; 17(10): 1969 - 1976.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a Letter to Editor
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Staels, B.
Right arrow Articles by Auwerx, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Staels, B.
Right arrow Articles by Auwerx, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 All ASBMB Journals   Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 
 Journal of Lipid Research   ASBMB Today 
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
Advertisement
spacer
Advertisement
Advertisement