|
Volume 271,
Number 3,
Issue of January 19, 1996 pp. 1579-1590
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
The
Biosynthetic Pathway of the Aminonucleoside Antibiotic Puromycin, as
Deduced from the Molecular Analysis of the pur Cluster of Streptomyces alboniger(*)
(Received for publication, July 24, 1995; and in revised form, October 23, 1995)
José A.
Tercero
(1),
J. Carlos
Espinosa
(1),
Rosa
A.
Lacalle (§),
,
Antonio
Jiménez
(1)(¶)From the Centro de
Biología Molecular ``Severo
Ochoa'', Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas and
Universidad Autónoma, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid,
Spain
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The pur cluster which encodes the puromycin
biosynthetic pathway from Streptomyces alboniger was subcloned
as a 13-kilobase fragment in plasmid pIJ702 and expressed in an
apparently regulated manner in the heterologous host Streptomyces
lividans. The sequencing of a 9.1-kilobase DNA fragment completed
the sequence of pur. This permitted identification of seven
new open reading frames in the order: napH, pur7, pur10,
pur6, pur4, pur5, and pur3. The latter is followed by the
known pac, dmpM, and pur8 genes. Nine open reading
frames are transcribed rightward as a unit in opposite direction to
that of the pur8 gene which is expressed as a monocistronic
transcript from the rightmost end. napH encodes the known N-acetylpuromycin N-acetylhydrolase. The deduced
products from other open reading frames present similarities to: NTP
pyrophosphohydrolases (pur7), several oxidoreductases (pur10), the putative LmbC protein of the lincomycin
biosynthetic pathway from Streptomyces lincolnensis (pur6), S-adenosylmethionine-dependent
methyltransferases (pur5), a variety of presumed
aminotransferases (pur4), and several monophosphatases (pur3). According to these similarities and to previous
biochemical work, a puromycin biosynthetic pathway has been deduced. No
cluster-associated regulatory gene was found. However, both pur10 and pur6 genes contain a TTA codon, which suggests that
they are translationally controlled by the bldA gene product,
a specific tRNA .
INTRODUCTION
Nucleoside antibiotics constitute an important group of
microbial secondary metabolites some of which are effective agents
against plant and human diseases. Examples are ribavarin (antiviral),
polyoxins (herbicides), and mildiomycin (plant antifungal antibiotic).
Given the key role accomplished by nucleosides and nucleotides in
biochemical processes, the nucleoside antibiotics have found a
fundamental application as specific inhibitors of a high variety of
biochemical reactions (for a review, see (1) ). These features
rise up the question of how the producing organisms defend themselves
against the toxic effects of their products and, in most cases, of the
relevant biosynthetic precursors. Puromycin is an aminoacyl
nucleoside antibiotic produced by Streptomyces alboniger. It
is a broad spectrum secondary metabolite active against Gram-positive
bacteria, protozoans, and mammalian cells, including tumor cells. It
has been a key compound in various cell-free systems directed to
elucidate the mechanism of protein synthesis and the mode of action of
other inhibitors of this process(2, 3) . Concerning
the biosynthetic pathway of puromycin, some data are available.
Adenosine is known to be a direct precursor for the
3`-amino-3`-deoxyadenosine moiety of puromycin(4) . Moreover, a
commercial sample of puromycin was found to be contaminated by small
amounts of N ,N ,O-tridemethylpuromycin, N ,O-didemethylpuromycin, and O-demethylpuromycin. This led to the proposal that puromycin
biosynthesis probably proceeds through these intermediates and in that
order(5) . Three enzymes of the pathway, an O-demethylpuromycin O-methyltransferase (DmpM), ( )a puromycin N-acetyltransferase (Pac), and an N-acetylpuromycin N-acetylhydrolase (NapH) have been
characterized(6, 7, 8) . Biochemical studies
suggest that Pac inactivates the intermediate N ,N ,O-tridemethylpuromycin
by acetylation, and that DmpM methylates N-acetyl-O-demethylpuromycin to form N-acetylpuromycin(7) . The latter would be excluded
from the cells and then hydrolyzed by the extracellular NapH activity (8) yielding the biologically active puromycin antibiotic. In
addition to Pac, the putative transmembrane protein Pur8 was shown to
confer resistance to puromycin in Streptomyces lividans and,
consequently, in S. alboniger, possibly by promoting an active
efflux energized by a proton-dependent electrochemical
gradient(9) . The complete set of genes (15 kb) encoding the
puromycin biosynthetic pathway (pur cluster) from S.
alboniger has been cloned in low-copy number cosmids and expressed
in a regulated pattern in heterologous hosts, S. lividans and Streptomyces griseofuscus(10) . Three genes of pur have been sequenced, pac, dmpM, and pur8, which encode Pac, DmpM, and Pur8,
respectively(9, 11, 12) . The three genes are
contiguously located at the right end of the cluster and in this order.
In addition, the napH gene, located at the left end of pur, was isolated and its product (NapH)
characterized(8) . Here, we report the completion of the
nucleotide sequence of pur, an analysis of its transcriptional
organization, and a novel proposal for the puromycin biosynthetic
pathway.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Strains, Plasmids, Media, and DNA
MethodologyS. alboniger ATCC12461, the puromycin
producer(13) , S. lividans 66(1326)(14) , and Escherichia coli strains DH5(15) , TG1(16) ,
and GM119(17) , are described in the indicated references. Streptomyces plasmid was pIJ702(18) . E. coli vectors were ``Bluescript'' SK- (Stratagene),
pUC19(19) , and M13 mp18/M13 mp19(20) . Plasmid DNA
from Streptomyces and E. coli was prepared as
described(14) . Growth of Streptomyces on solid media
was carried out on R5(14) . Liquid media for Streptomyces were YEME, containing 34% sucrose and 5 mM MgSO , or puromycin-producing S, containing starch as a
carbon source(10, 14) . Liquid and agar media for E. coli were LB and LB plus 2% agar,
respectively(21) . When required, thiostrepton was added to a
final concentration of 25 and 10 µg/ml in liquid and agar medium,
respectively. Apramycin was added at 25 µg/ml in liquid medium for Streptomyces. For E. coli, 100 µg of ampicillin
was added per ml. Transformation of E. coli and Streptomyces was performed as described(14) .
Transfection of E. coli TG1 was performed as
described(22) .DNA sequencing was by the dideoxy chain
termination method (23) using Sequenase 2.0 (U. S. Biochemical
Corp.) or Taq DNA polymerase (Promega Biotech) following the
manufacturer's protocols. 7-Deaza-dGTP was used instead of dGTP.
4, 5, and 6% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea were
used. Occasionally, to resolve band compressions, 6% polyacrylamide
gels containing 40% formamide were used. Appropriate DNA restriction
fragments were cloned previously in M13 mp18 and M13 mp19. Universal
primer and custom made oligonucleotides (Isogen Bioscience, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands) were used as required.
Transcription AnalysisTo perform S1 mapping
experiments, S. alboniger was grown in S medium. RNA was
isolated as described(24) . RNA was annealed to DNA probes
(labeled with [ - P]ATP or
[ - P]dCTP to determine transcription
initiation and termination, respectively) and then digested with S1
nuclease as described elsewhere(12) . The resulting products
were developed on either 1% alkaline agarose gels (low resolution
experiments) or on 4, 5, or 6% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea for high-resolution determination of transcription
initiation/termination sites. The sizes of the protected fragments were
evaluated by comparing their mobilities with those of DNA markers or
DNA fragments obtained by sequencing reactions.
Determination of PuromycinPuromycin was extracted
from culture filtrates as described elsewhere(10) . It was
identified by the Pac enzymic assay (7) and by TLC, using ethyl
acetate:methanol (3:1) as solvent on cellulose F (Merck,
Darmstadt)(10) . Quantification of puromycin was achieved by
the Pac assay(7) .
Computer AnalysisDNA and protein sequences were
analyzed with the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group
package version 8(25) . Comparisons of the amino acid sequences
of Pur proteins with the sequence data bases were also performed using
the BLAST program (26) at the NCBI server. The DNA Strider
group of programs (27) was occasionally used for sequence
analysis.
RESULTS
Boundaries of the pur ClusterPrior to
sequencing, we attempted to define, as precisely as possible, the ends
of the pur cluster. By comparing the restriction maps of
puromycin-producing and non-producing pKC505-derivative plasmids, we
previously showed that pur was encoded by a single DNA
fragment of approximately 15 kb (10; Fig. 1). Moreover, the napH and pur8 genes could mark the ends of the
cluster (Fig. 1; (8) and (9) ). Therefore, the
13-kb ClaI-EcoRI (labeled E*, Fig. 1and below) fragment from pCXS (Fig. 1) was
subcloned in the high-copy number plasmid pIJ702. The resulting
construct (pRCP11; Fig. 1) was introduced into S.
lividans. Puromycin was present in the fermentation broth of a
relevant transformant, as determined by TLC and Pac assays (not shown),
which indicates that all the structural genes for puromycin production
are present in the 13-kb ClaI-E fragment.
Moreover, the amount of puromycin produced in S.
lividans(pRCP11) was similar to that in a control S.
lividans(pPB5.13) ( Fig. 1and data not shown). In
transformants carrying pRCP11, puromycin production starts at the
middle of the log-phase, similarly to S. lividans(pPB5.13) and S. alboniger(10) . In the particular case of S.
lividans(pRCP11) this cannot be attributed to a variation of
plasmid copy number/structure, since these apparently remained
unchanged during all stages of the growth curve (not shown). Therefore,
it appears that in S. lividans expression of the pur cluster from pRCP11 is regulated in a similar manner than in S. alboniger or S. lividans(pPB5.13)(10) .
Figure 1:
Restriction maps of the DNA inserts
from several constructs, puromycin production phenotype of S.
lividans transformants and organization of the ORFs of pur. A, the restriction maps of cosmids pPB5.13,
pPB4.6, and pPB11.40 and plasmid pCXS were modified from(10) .
Plasmid pRCP11 was obtained by subcloning the 13-kb ClaI-EcoRI (labeled E* in other restriction
maps as well) fragment from pCXS into Bluescript. From the resulting
plasmid, this fragment was isolated as a KpnI-PstI
piece, which was finally inserted in the KpnI-PstI
replicon fragment of pIJ702. + and - indicate production or
no production of puromycin by the relevant S. lividans transformants, respectively. Enzymes: C, ClaI; E, EcoRI; K, KpnI; N, NcoI; P, PstI; S, SpeI; X, XhoI; Xb, XbaI. B, ORFs
and transcriptional organization of the pur cluster. The
incomplete orfA and orf1 are interrupted by the ClaI and EcoRI sites, respectively. The gray
region indicates the sequence obtained in this work. Only relevant
restriction sites are indicated. Size of the ORFs is indicated by small arrows drawn immediately below. Lines a, b, c, and d indicate the DNA fragments used as probes in low
resolution S1-protection assays. Above them, continuous arrows indicate the size and direction of clearly identified transcripts,
whereas dotted arrows indicate possible
transcripts.
Sequence of purStarting at the ClaI site (Fig. 1), a total of 9.12 kb were sequenced (Fig. 2). The
sequence covered the unknown pur region and overlapped with
the known sequence of pac ((11) ; Fig. 1). It
contained seven complete and one incomplete ORFs ( Fig. 1and Fig. 2). All shared a codon usage and a G + C content at
the third position typical of Streptomyces(28) , with
an exception made of the 5`-end of the napH coding sequence
(see below). From left to right these ORFs were named/identified as: orfA, napH, pur7, pur10, pur6, pur4 (previously named prg1; (10) ), pur5 and pur3. The incomplete orfA probably did not pertain to the cluster, because its
incompleteness did not prevent puromycin production from pRCP11 (Fig. 1). Therefore, the left end of the cluster should reside
between orfA and napH. Similarly, in plasmids
pPB11.40 and pRCP11 (Fig. 1), 5` to pur8 there is
another incomplete ORF (orf1) ((9) ; Fig. 1),
which indicates that the right end of pur lies between these
two ORFs. Several characteristics of the intact ORFs are indicated in Table 1.
Figure 2:
Nucleotide sequence of a 9.12-kb DNA
fragment from the pur cluster. The deduced gene products are
indicated in the one-letter code under the DNA sequence.
Possible ribosome binding sites (rbs) are indicated by dotted lines. Putative translation initiation codons are in bold letters. The start and direction of each of the ORFs are
indicated by up arrows and named accordingly. A presumptive
signal peptide of NapH is underlined and its putative cleavage
site is indicated by a vertical arrow. A proposed motif for
Pur10 and similar oxidoreductases is underlined. An inverted
repeat located 3` to pur5, which could form a stem-loop for
transcription termination is indicated by horizontal arrows.
Putative -10 and -35 regions of napH are
indicated. Possible transcription initiation and termination sites are
indicated by bold triangles and an open triangle, respectively. Restriction sites with an asterisk are not
unique in the sequence DNA; they are referred to in the text. The 5`
region of the previously reported pac sequence(11) ,
which has been revised in this work, is indicated by small
letters.
Previously, it was shown that the napH gene
is part of a 2.5-kb SphI-NcoI fragment from the left
end of pur(8) . The single complete ORF of 1458
nucleotides found in this fragment (Fig. 2) was, therefore,
attributed to napH. Its deduced product has 485 amino acids (Table 1). Both upstream and downstream of the chosen initiator
codon there are other putative initiator codons (Fig. 2). They
were rejected as probable initiators because, for those located
downstream, destruction of a BamHI site at position 730 ( Fig. 1and Fig. 2) prevented expression of NapH activity (8) and, for those located upstream, only the selected
initiator codon was preceded by a good ribosomal binding site (Table 1; Fig. 2). NapH is an extracellular enzyme (8) and, in agreement with this, its N-terminal region presents
the characteristics of a signal peptide(29) . Thus, it contains
a positively charged leading region (MLHRIQRKR), followed by a
hydrophobic central region (AMTAGAVGVLFLAQLVI) and a polar region
(SSSSAAA). The putative signal peptide contains 33 residues, a value
close to the mean size of 35 for the putative signal peptides from Streptomyces(30) . The presence of this signal peptide
also helps to select the corresponding DNA sequence as a coding region,
despite the fact that its codon usage deviates from that typical of Streptomyces. Comparisons of the NapH sequence with those in
data banks disclosed significant similarities (28.9% identity; 49.3%
similarity) with the aminopeptidase Y from Saccharomyces
cerevisiae(31) . The ORF corresponding to pur7 comprises 459 nucleotides, of which the first eight overlap with
the 3` end of the napH coding sequence. A similar situation
was previously found for other Streptomyces genes(32) . pur7 encodes a hydrophilic protein
(Pur7) of 152 residues (Table 1; Fig. 2) which contains a
highly conserved domain present in proteins from a wide variety of
organisms. Besides this, no generally significant similarities are
present in this group of proteins. This domain was defined by Koonin (33) as a region of approximately 40 residues, generally
located at the N terminus. Its consensus sequence is
GX EX -(STAGC)-(LIVMA)-XRE-(LIVMF)-XEE,
where X represents any amino acid and residues in parentheses
indicate the most frequent ones in those positions (Fig. 3). It
has been proposed that this domain is the catalytic center of
NTP-pyrophosphohydrolases which produce PP and the relevant
NMP. Indeed, such activity has been found in several of these proteins
of which the most thoroughly studied are MutT from E. coli,
which names the
family(34, 35, 36, 37) , MutX from Streptococcus pneumoniae(38) , MutT from Proteus
vulgaris(39) , and MutT from humans(40) . MutT
hydrolyses 8-oxo dGTP and, less efficiently, other
nucleotides(41) . Curiously, dATP is a better substrate for
MutX, which presents the highest similarity to Pur7, than for other
members of the MutT family(42) . Moreover, Orf17 from E.
coli(42) , which does not complement the mutT mutation in E. coli, hydrolyses all dNTPs. These data
suggest a nucleotide-pyrophosphohydrolase activity for Pur7.
Figure 3:
Alignment of Pur7 with several proteins
which contain the domain of the MutT family. The alignment corresponds
to the different protein regions where the domain is localized and some
of the relevant flanking amino acids. Identical residues in all
proteins are in white letters with a black background. Residues which are identical in Pur7 and several of
the other proteins, and conservative replacements are in bold
letters. Orf257 is a NADH pyrophosphatase from E. coli(87) . Accession numbers of Orf154 from Streptomyces
ambofaciens, InvA from Bartonella bacilliformis and of
D250R from porcine African swine fever virus (Asfv) are
Z19590, L25276, and L07263, respectively. References of the other
proteins are indicated in the text.
The pur10 gene would encode a hydrophilic protein of 338 amino
acids (Table 1; Fig. 2). Curiously, a TTA codon is present
at position 2797 of the ORF (Fig. 2). This is a very rare codon
in Streptomyces. It encodes leucine 29. The matching
tRNA is encoded in the bldA gene, which has been
implicated in translational regulation(43) . Pur10 showed
similarities, mainly at the N-terminal region, with proteins implicated
in oxidoreduction activities, including the mammalian biliverdin
reductase (22.6% identity; 50.5% similarity)(44) ; the
glucose-fructose oxidoreductase from Zymomonas mobilis (20.5%
identity; 43.2% similarity)(45) ; a galactose dehydrogenase
from Pseudomonas fluorescens (22.8% identity; 50.2%
similarity)(46) ; and LmbZ from S. lincolnensis (24%
identity; 46.7% similarity), for which an oxidoreductase activity has
been proposed in the lincomycin biosynthetic pathway(47) . It
is worth mentioning the presence of an invariant aspartic acid (residue
73 in Pur10) in all these proteins. Moreover, a highly conserved region
localized between residues 95 and 107 could define a motif
(GKH-(IVLM)-(IVLM)-XEkPX (TS)) which would
represent these proteins (Fig. 2). Therefore, we propose an
oxidoreductase activity for Pur10. The pur6 gene would
encode a hydrophilic protein of 772 amino acids (Table 1; Fig. 2). Similarly to pur10, it possesses a TTA codon
which encodes leucine 3 (Fig. 2). Sequence comparisons only
showed certain similarities between the N-terminal halves of Pur6 and
the LmbC deduced protein of the lincomycin biosynthetic pathway from S. lincolnensis. Thus, the first 300 amino acids of these two
proteins share 24.6% identity and 48.1% similarity. The precise
function of LmbC is still unknown. However, it presents significant
similarities with members of the peptide synthetase family of enzymes
as well as to a subfamily of aminoacyl adenylate-forming domains of
aromatic amino acid-activating enzymes (47) . LmbC has been
proposed as an L-tyrosine-activating enzyme, besides other
putative activating functions. All these proteins contain an
AMP-binding domain, which could not be detected in Pur6. Given the low
similarity of Pur6 with peptide synthetases, i.e. with TycA
(tyrocidine synthetase from Bacillus subtilis, accession
number P09095) the values are 19.6% identity and 40.2% similarity, it
is difficult to assign an amino acid (i.e. tyrosine, a moiety
of puromycin) activating activity for Pur6, although there are some
hints to suggest that it might be implicated in the transfer of
tyrosine to 3`-amino-3`-deoxyadenosine (see ``Discussion''). The pur4 gene would determine a protein (Pur4) of 429 amino
acids (Table 1; Fig. 2). Although this structure is
chiefly hydrophilic, it contains some hydrophobic stretches in its
N-terminal half. A partial sequence of Pur4 was previously
reported(10) . It presented significant similarities with the
deduced amino acid sequences of eryC1, from the erythromycin
biosynthetic pathway of Saccharopolyspora
erythraea(48) , orf10.4 from the rfb cluster of Salmonella typhimurium(49) , and the
pleiotropic, putative regulatory gene degT of B.
subtilis(50) . Also, significant similarities of Pur4 were
found with the products of the dnrJ, strS, tylB, and lmbS genes, which are implicated in the
biosynthetic pathways of several antibiotics from Streptomyces(47, 51, 52, 53) .
Based on the clear similarities of these genes with the degT gene, a regulatory role in the relevant biosynthetic pathways was
proposed for some of them(10, 51, 52) . More
recently, however, it was suggested that these genes including pur4 may encode aminotransferases (54, 55, 56) . Indeed, all of them have a
conserved lysine residue (lysine 204 in Pur4; Fig. 2) which
could be used to bind the presumptive aminotransfer coenzyme pyridoxal
phosphate by forming a Schiff base. Moreover, this conserved lysine is
located in a motif
(GX DX AX EDX GX KX geGGX G;
residues 153-229 in Pur4; Fig. 2) according to
Piepersberg(56) . Therefore, Pur4 may display an
aminotransferase activity. The pur5 gene encodes a protein
(Pur5) of 228 amino acids (Table 1; Fig. 2). This product
is mainly hydrophilic with a hydrophobic stretch between residues 40
and 80. Sequence comparison of Pur5 with proteins from data banks
detected a small glycine-rich region between amino acids 64 and 80
which is highly conserved, usually at the N-terminal region, in a
variety of methyltransferases and other enzymes which use AdoMet as a
cosubstrate (Fig. 4). This domain corresponds to region I as
defined by Ingrosso et al.(57) . Its consensus
sequence was later slightly modified (58) as
hhD/EhGXGXGXhXXXhh , where h is
a hydrophobic amino acid, X is any amino acid, and is
generally a charged amino acid. The presence of this charged amino acid
in the last position of the domain could be questioned, according to
the alignment presented in Fig. 4. Two other regions (II and
III), which were proposed elsewhere (57, 59) are not
rigorously detected in several AdoMet-dependent methyltransferases
including Pur5 (58; not shown). The presence of region I in Pur5
suggests that it may have a AdoMet-dependent methyltransferase
activity.
Figure 4:
Alignment of Pur5 and several proteins
which carry a methyltransferase domain. Alignment was performed as in Fig. 3. Asterisks represent glycine residues which
could conform a turn at the center of the domain, according to the
secondary structure prediction. Dots indicate the putative
position of hydrophobic amino acids, according to Wu et al.(58) . Aligned proteins are: UbiG (E.
coli, M87509); EryG (Saccharopolyspora erythraea,
X60379); ErmE (S. erythraea, X51891); TehB (Klebsiella aerogenes, M74072); PRMA (E. coli,
P28637); HNMT (human, U08092); RdmB (Streptomyces purpuracens,
U10405); PmtA (Rhodobacter sphaeroides, L07247); LmbG and LmbW (S. lincolnensis, X79146); and dnr-ORF5 (S.
peucetius, L35560), where figures in brackets represent
the relevant accession number.
Finally, the pur3 gene would encode a protein
(Pur3) of 273 amino acids (Table 1; Fig. 2). Although this
product is mainly hydrophilic it contains two significant hydrophobic
regions between residues 90-120 and 190-230. Pur3 has
significant similarity with a family of proteins(60) , which
includes a variety of inositol monophosphatases and other proteins of
different origins (Fig. 5), including the bovine IMP (28.3%
identity and 44.8% similarity), a key enzyme of the inositol phosphate
second messenger pathway(61) . This enzyme hydrolyses D-inositol phosphates producing inositol. It is also
significant the similarity of Pur3 with the Hal2 protein from S. cerevisiae (27.9% identity; 47.9% similarity),
which is involved in salt tolerance and methionine
biosynthesis(62) , and CysQ from E. coli (27.7%
identity; 48.3% similarity), which is required for cysteine
biosynthesis and could help control the pool of 3`-phosphoadenosine
5`-phosphosulfate(63) . All these proteins share two highly
conserved domains(60) , as well as certain identical residues
mainly at the N-terminal half (Fig. 5). The tridimensional
structure of IMP (64) indicates that these two domains
participate in the binding of phosphate and Mg , which
are essential for enzymic activity. The two domains are also present in
the bovine inositol polyphosphate phosphatase(65) , which has
scarce similarity in other parts of the sequence with other proteins of
the family. As indicated by Neuwald et al.(60) , most
proteins carrying these two domains could be phosphatases. This
activity could, therefore, be attributed to Pur3.
Figure 5:
Alignment of Pur3 with several proteins.
The bovine brain inositol monophosphatase (IMP) was introduced
as an example of proteins displaying this enzymic activity. QutG from Aspergillus nidulans (28.3% identity; 49.4% similarity; 88)
and Qa-X from Neurospora crassa (27% identity; 49.6%
similarity; 89) are implicated in the utilization of quinic acid in
these organisms. SuhB from E. coli (30.6 identity; 50.6
similarity) is implicated in the regulation of a transcriptional
-factor of genes encoding heat-shock proteins(90) .
Yhr046C is an ORF from S. cerevisiae which pertains
to this family of proteins (25.5% identity; 47.4%
similarity)(91) . The values of identity and similarity refer
to comparisons of the different proteins with Pur3. Alignments and
features are as in Fig. 3. The final amino acids of several
proteins are not presented.
Transcript MappingPrevious work showed that the pac and dmpM genes were transcribed in a single RNA
which terminated 3` to the second gene(12) . The sequence
reported here and elsewhere (11, 12) shows that nine
ORFs of pur, closely linked to each other, share the same
direction of transcription (Fig. 1). Moreover, an inverted
repeat, which could form a strong stem-loop of G =
-35.2 kcal/mol(66) , is located 3` to pur5 (Fig. 2). It could act as a transcription termination
structure similar to that found for other Streptomyces genes (67, 68) . Other putative transcription termination
structures were previously found 3` to dmpM and pur8(9, 12) . To determine the
transcriptional organization of the pur cluster, total RNA was
isolated from a late log phase culture of S. alboniger, when
puromycin was actively synthesized. Initially, a broad localization of
possible transcription initiation sites was carried out by low
resolution S1 protection assays with probes indicated in Fig. 1.
The results suggested that a transcript, which started 5` to napH and covered all nine ORFs with the same direction of transcription
was present. In addition, transcription initiation between pur5 and pur3 was also detected (not shown). The clear lack of
transcription initiation between pur3 and pac is in
contrast to previous data, which indicated both promoter activity and
transcription initiation 5` to pac(11) . However,
these data were obtained from S. lividans transformants which
contained the pac gene inserted in plasmid vectors and were
grown in a different culture medium than the one used here. It is
possible, therefore, that we have been unable to detect those events in S. alboniger.A higher resolution study was also carried
out using S1 protection experiments to confirm the existence of the
transcription start points detected by low resolution nuclease-S1
assays. To locate the transcription initiation site 5` to napH, we used a probe (Fig. 6) covering its 5` coding
region and the noncoding region between this gene and orfA.
The nuclease assay showed a protected fragment of about 500 bp (Fig. 6), which indicated that napH transcription
started around position 679, 41 bp upstream of the translational
initiator GTG (Fig. 2). Possible -10 and -35 regions
are indicated in Fig. 2. To identify a possible transcription
initiation site 5` of pur3, the probe used (Fig. 6),
covered the 5` end of this ORF and the region between pur5 and pur3. A protected fragment of approximately 290 bp (Fig. 6) suggested the presence of a transcription initiation
signal around position 8210, 43-bp upstream of the pur3 initiator ATG (Fig. 2). No clear -10 and -35
regions were found. Transcription initiation upstream of pur8 was examined using a probe that covered the 5` end of pur8 and all the noncoding region up to orf1(9) . A
protected fragment of 124 bp (Fig. 6) indicated the existence of
transcription initiation 59-bp upstream of the pur8 initiator
ATG(9) .
Figure 6:
Transcription analysis. Total RNA used was
isolated (14) from S. alboniger samples taken at 5.0 A (10) , when puromycin was actively
produced as shown by a Pac assay. RNA samples (50 µg) were
hybridized to the P-labeled probes described below. High
resolution S1 mapping was performed as described(11) . Lanes G, A, T, and C contain standards from
sequencing reactions of known sequences from pur (B,
C, and D), and a fragment from M13 mp18 (A). For D, 29 digested with HindIII and labeled with P was also used as size standard. Numbers on the left margins indicate the size (in nucleotides) of the
standards and those on the right the size (in nucleotides) of
the DNA fragments protected from the nuclease S1 digestion. Lines 1 and 2 represent S1 assays performed with S. alboniger RNA and yeast tRNA, respectively. Line 3 represents DNA
probes. A, transcription initiation of napH. The
2.07-kb BglII-XhoI fragment from pur (nucleotides 363-2429; Fig. 2) was cloned in Bluescript.
From the resulting construct (pPS1.8), an 855-bp SplI
(internal site to the napH coding sequence, Fig. 2)-SacI (from the polylinker of the vector)
fragment was isolated, labeled at the SplI end and then used
as a probe. B, transcription initiation of pur3. From
plasmid pPS5.2 (5.5-kb XhoI-EcoRI fragment from pur, cloned in pUC19; XhoI, nucleotide 7523, Fig. 2. EcoRI, right end, Fig. 1), a 984-bp SalI (internal site to the pur3 coding sequence; Fig. 2)-PstI (from the polylinker of the vector)
fragment was isolated, labeled at the SalI end and then used
as a probe. C, transcription initiation of pur8. The
2-kb SalI-EcoRI rightmost fragment of pur was cloned in Bluescript. From the resulting plasmid (pPS2.0; 9),
a 743-bp BamHI (internal site to the pur8 sequence)-PstI (from the polylinker of the vector)
fragment was isolated, labeled at the BamHI end, and then used
as a probe. D, transcription termination of pur5.
From plasmid pPS1.0 (984-bp SalI-PstI fragment
described above, cloned in Bluescript), a 1.08-kb StyI
(internal site to pur5 sequence; Fig. 2)-SspI
(from the vector polylinker) fragment, was isolated, labeled at StyI and used as a probe.
The stem-loop 3` to pur5 referred to above
suggested that transcription termination could take place at this
region. To examine this possibility, a high resolution S1 protection
experiment was performed using a probe (Fig. 6) that comprised
all the DNA between pur5 and pur3, including the
stem-loop (Fig. 2), plus a Bluescript tail. The results
indicated the presence of major protected fragments of approximately
840 and 512 bp, and minor protected ones of 535-545 and 1080 bp
sizes (Fig. 6). The 1080-bp fragment corresponds to probe/probe
reannealing. The 840-bp fragment corresponds to full protection of the
probe minus the non-homologous plasmid sequence, thus confirming the
existence of a transcript that extends through the stem-loop into pur3. The protected band of approximately 512 bp may
correspond to transcription termination close to the 5` end of the
stem-loop. The minor protected bands suggest that transcription
termination occasionally occurs at the region close to or covering the
loop located within the inverted repeat 3` to pur5. However,
since these protected fragments have not been found 3` to the putative
transcription terminator, it is questionable that these terminations
really take place in vivo, and other possible roles for this
stem-loop must be considered (see ``Discussion''). Therefore,
these studies and those reported elsewhere (12) show that the pur cluster is transcribed into at least two mRNA species: one
of them is a polycistronic messenger that covers nine ORFs, and the
other one is a monocistronic messenger transcribed in the opposite
direction that corresponds to pur8. In addition, there may be
two other transcripts that span napH through pur5 and pur3 through dmpM, respectively (Fig. 1).
DISCUSSION
Gene Organization of the pur ClusterThis paper
shows that the genes of the pur cluster, which determines the
puromycin biosynthetic pathway of S. alboniger, are
located in a single DNA fragment of approximately 13 kb. It comprises
10 ORFs, nine of which are contiguous and have the same direction of
transcription and only one (pur8), located at the right end of
the cluster, is transcribed in the opposite direction. The different
enzymic steps of this pathway should be assigned to these ORFs. In
fact, the biochemical studies of some of the expressed
proteins(5, 7, 8) , together with the
similarities of the deduced gene products with known proteins, have
allowed the proteins to attribute specific functions to all the genes
of the cluster. As suggested by others, the possibility that some
unlinked structural gene(s) could play a role in the biosynthesis of
this antibiotic should not be excluded(47, 69) . If
so, such gene(s) should also be present in S. lividans, since
puromycin production was achieved in this organism carrying the 13-kb
fragment. The analysis of the biosynthetic gene cluster for puromycin
is of special interest since it is the first one to be isolated for a
nucleoside antibiotic. It should serve as a model system for related
clusters.
Transcription of the pur ClusterThe transcription
analyses of the pur cluster described here and elsewhere (12) indicate the existence of a polycistronic transcript which
starts 5` to napH and terminates 3` to dmpM and
comprises all ORFs of pur, except pur8, which is
transcribed in the opposite direction as a monocistronic transcript.
The expression of most ORFs of pur as a polycistronic
transcript is in agreement with several other clusters for antibiotic
biosynthesis (69, 70, 71) . As indicated
elsewhere(71) , these polycistronic transcripts should
facilitate the regulation of antibiotic biosynthesis improving its
efficiency. In addition, two other transcripts, comprising napH through pur5 and pur3 through dmpM,
respectively, may be synthesized in the pur cluster.
Nevertheless, as indicated above, the transcription terminator function
of the stem-loop located between pur5 and pur3, which
would explain the existence of these two transcripts, may be
questioned. Therefore, transcription termination 3` to pur5 and transcription initiation 5` to pur3 may not occur in vivo. An alternative role for this stem-loop might be to
confer variable stability to different segments of the polycistronic
transcript(71) . Finally, additional promoters active under
certain physiological conditions and that could contribute to the
regulation of pur expression should not be discarded.
The Puromycin Biosynthetic PathwaySequencing of a
gene cluster provides an analysis of its molecular organization and an
insight, by sequence comparison with data banks, into the functions of
many of its putative gene products. Moreover, if additional biochemical
data are available, this insight can be achieved with a high degree of
certainty. The rationale to propose the initial steps of the puromycin
biosynthetic pathway from S. alboniger takes into account the
finding that [U- C]adenosine is a direct
precursor of the 3`-amino-3`-deoxyadenosine moiety of
puromycin(4) . The 3` addition of an amino group to the ribose
moiety of adenosine should take place, similarly to other deoxysugars,
through a 3`-keto intermediate (for a review, see (55) ).
Therefore, in the puromycin pathway this intermediate should be
3`-keto-3`-deoxyadenosine, which by means of an aminotransferase would
be converted to 3`-amino-3`-deoxyadenosine. However, in both
Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and in Ehrlich ascites tumor
cells, 3`-amino-3`-deoxyadenosine is triphosphorylated by adenosine
kinase, producing 3`-amino-3`-deoxy-ATP, a strong inhibitor of
DNA-dependent RNA polymerase(72, 73, 74) .
Therefore, it seems likely that, if produced, 3`-keto-3`-deoxyadenosine
would also be 5`-triphosphorylated. The resulting product,
3`-keto-3`-deoxy-ATP, could also be highly toxic. If so, S.
alboniger should have a means to prevent the harmful effects of
these putative intermediates. This could be either a resistant RNA
polymerase or an adenosine kinase which does not recognize the
3`-derivatives. Moreover, it seems safe to assume that these mechanisms
of autodefense are not present in S. lividans, where pur determines puromycin production. Therefore, the resistance system
should most likely be encoded by this cluster. We propose Pur7 as the
responsible enzyme conferring this resistance. Pur7 is a member of the
MutT family of NTP-pyrophosphohydrolases, which play an important role
in the detoxification of certain mutagenic/carcinogenic keto
derivatives of the NTPs. Thus, the MutT protein from E. coli and humans hydrolyses 8-oxo-dGTP producing PP and an
inactive 8-oxo-dGMP(41, 75) . Therefore,
3`-keto-3`-deoxy-ATP could be inactivated by Pur7 producing a
supposedly nontoxic 3`-keto-3`-deoxy-AMP and PP . This
proposal is also based on the finding that the mono- and
diphosphorylated derivatives of 3`-amino-3`-deoxy-ATP lack biological
activity(76, 77) . Therefore, 3`-keto-3`-deoxy-AMP
would then be the substrate for an aminotransferase to produce a
non-toxic 3`-amino-3`-deoxy-AMP. In this way, the initial steps of the
pathway could proceed through inactive intermediates. Because puromycin
biosynthesis initiates when growth is still maintained(7) ,
adenosine would preferentially be converted into ATP rather than into
3`-keto-3`-deoxyadenosine. Therefore, it seems plausible to propose
that adenosine would enter the pathway via ATP (compound I; Fig. 7). If so, the latter would be converted by the putative
oxidoreductase Pur10 (NAD could be its cofactor; (55) ) into 3`-keto-3`-deoxy-ATP (compound II; Fig. 7),
which would be hydrolyzed by Pur7 to yield 3`-keto-3`-deoxy-AMP
(compound III; Fig. 7). This intermediate would then be modified
by the presumptive aminotransferase Pur4 to produce
3`-amino-3`-deoxy-AMP (compound IV; Fig. 7). As described for
aminotransferases which are implicated in amino sugar biosynthesis in
Gram-negative bacteria(78) , Pur4 would be a pyridoxal
phosphate/L-glutamate(L-glutamine)-dependent
enzyme(54, 56) . Assuming that the pathway proceeds in
this manner, the 5`-phosphate group should be eliminated at some step.
This hydrolysis could be carried out by Pur3, which presents
significant similarities to a variety of monophosphatases (Fig. 5). However, it should not be at this stage of the pathway
because the resulting intermediate would be phosphorylated back to
3`-amino-3`-deoxy-ATP. Therefore, Pur3 should act on a subsequent
intermediate.
Figure 7:
Proposed biosynthetic pathway of
puromycin. Roman numerals indicate compounds referred to in
the text.
It has been proposed that tyrosine would be attached
by its -COOH group to the 3` -NH group of
3`-amino-3`-deoxyadenosine to produce N ,N ,O-tridemethylpuromycin (5, 7) . According to our proposal, formation of this
bond should take place on the 5`-phosphoderivative (Fig. 7),
thus removing it from the nucleotide pool to prevent any additional
phosphorylation. This reaction would be equivalent to a peptide bond
formation step, which would previously require an activation of
tyrosine. Amino acid activation is performed by aminoacyl-tRNA
synthetases, antibiotic peptide synthetases, the bacterial
peptidoglycan precursor synthetases, and condensing enzymes of the
-lactams
antibiotics(79, 80, 81, 82) .
Assuming that the relevant gene(s) is(are) not on a separate
locus(loci), the only putative enzyme, by elimination, of the puromycin
biosynthetic pathway to which this function could be attributed is
Pur6. Although it presents low level similarities to these enzymes and
apparently lacks any AMP binding domain, this might not be an impeding
difficulty. Thus, LeuS, a leucyl-tRNA synthetase, has low similarities
to members of the peptide antibiotic synthetases and lacks an apparent
AMP binding site(83) . The only ORF from data banks which
presents a similarity to Pur6 is LmbC from the lincomycin biosynthetic
gene cluster. This ORF appears to belong to the peptide synthetase
family of proteins. It has been proposed to be an activating enzyme of
either tyrosine, before conversion to L-dihydroxyphenylalanine, or propylproline (a
tyrosine-derivative intermediate), prior to condensation at the
-NH group of the sugar moiety of lincomycin(47) .
In our case, the activation of tyrosine could be performed by a
different enzyme (i.e. a tyrosinyl-tRNA synthetase) and Pur6
might only catalyze its linkage to 3`-amino-3`-deoxy-AMP to produce N ,N ,O-tridemethylpuromycin-5`-phosphate
(compound V; Fig. 7). Given the rarity of the linkage attributed
to Pur6, a sequence deviation from peptide bond forming enzymes should
not be surprising. Indeed, Pur6 could be a member of a variety of
enzymes which are implicated in the biosynthetic pathways of certain
nucleoside antibiotics of bacterial and fungal origin, like
chriscandin, A201A, and the agricultural fungicides polyoxins, where a
variety of polycarbon chains are attached to the amino-ribofuranosyl
moieties by forming a peptide bond-like linkage(1) . It has
been proposed that N ,N ,O-tridemethylpuromycin
is dimethylated at N (5) . However, the
resulting intermediate inhibits protein synthesis(84) , and to
prevent it, a Pac-dependent inactivation by N-acetylation of
the -NH group of the tyrosinyl moiety of
tridemethylpuromycin has been suggested(7) . According to our
proposal, this acetylation should take place on compound V (Fig. 7). The resulting intermediate (compound VI; Fig. 7) would be N -dimethylated by Pur5,
which presents a typical motif of AdoMet-dependent N-methylases (Fig. 4). Curiously, AdoMet-dependent N -methylation of either N ,N ,O-tridemethylpuromycin
or N ,O-didemethylpuromycin with cell
extracts from S. alboniger has not been detected. This result
was attributed to the possible requirement of a precursor derivative
such as a phosphate ester(5) . Indeed, our proposal suggests
that this modified precursor is compound VI (Fig. 7). The
resulting N-acetyl-O-demethylpuromycin-5`-phosphate
(compound VIII, via compound VII; Fig. 7) would be O-methylated by DmpM(5, 7) . However, the
affinity of DmpM for N-acetyl-O-demethylpuromycin
(compound IX; Fig. 7) is very high (K = 2.3 µM; 7), which suggests that this,
instead of VIII, is the real substrate for this enzyme. Therefore, the
5`-phosphate group could be removed by Pur3 prior to O-methylation. If so, this removal could take place even at an
earlier step (i.e. from compound V; Fig. 7). This
sequence of reactions would produce N-acetylpuromycin
(compound X; Fig. 7), which would be secreted to be N-hydrolyzed by NapH, the puromycin (compound XI; Fig. 7) activating enzyme ((8) ; Fig. 7).
Regulation of the pur ClusterIt has been
surprising not to find evidence for a pathway-specific regulatory gene
associated to the pur cluster. While this is also the case for
the tcm biosynthetic pathway isolated from the tetracenomycin
C producer, Streptomyces glaucescens(69) , many
antibiotic biosynthetic gene clusters have a transcriptional activator
associated with them(85) . Given that puromycin production is
clearly temporally controlled, it is possible that some pleiotropic
regulator is responsible for activating the pur cluster. A
number of pleiotropic regulatory genes have been isolated from Streptomyces coelicolor which affect multiple antibiotic
pathways, but are not pathway-associated(86) . The observation
that pur expression appears to be regulated in S.
lividans(pRCP11) implies that such a putative pleiotropic
regulator(s) is not specific to S. alboniger and, indeed may
even be widespread among actinomycetes. The isolation and
characterization of these genes may uncover novel regulatory mechanisms
in secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways within this important
group of bacteria. In this context, the existence of TTA codons in the
5` ends of the coding regions of both pur10 and pur6 may be of interest, since it suggests that both genes are
controlled by the product of the bldA gene(43) .
Interestingly, according to our proposal for puromycin biosynthesis,
Pur10 would catalyze the first step of the pathway, and it is tempting
to speculate on the role of translational regulation in expression of
the pur cluster.
FOOTNOTES
- *
- This work was
supported by grants from the Comisión
Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología,
Spain (BIO93-1182), Comunidad Autónoma de
Madrid (119/92), SmithKline Beecham-CDTI and EU BRIDGE (BIOT-CT0155),
and by an institutional grant from the Fundación
Ramón Areces to the Centro de
Biología Molecular. The costs of
publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of
page charges. This article must therefore by hereby marked
``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
The nucleotide
sequence(s) reported in this paper has been submitted to the
GenBank(TM)/EMBL Data Bank with accession number(s)
X92429[GenBank]. - §
- Present address: Pharmacia
Antibióticos-Farma S. A., Antonio
López 109, 28026 Madrid, Spain.
- ¶
- To whom correspondence should be addressed:
Centro de Biología Molecular, Universidad
Autónoma, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. Tel.:
34-1-3978442; Fax: 34-1-3974799; ajimenez{at}mvax.cbm.uam.es.uam.es.
- (
) - The abbreviations used are: DmpM, O-demethylpuromycin O-methyltransferase; Pac,
puromycin N-acetyltransferase; NapH, N-acetylpuromycin N-acetylhydrolase; kb, kilobase
pair(s); ORF, open reading frame; AdoMet, S-adenosylmethionine; bp, base pair(s).
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank A. Martín for
expert technical assistance and S. J. Lucania for the gift of
thiostrepton.
REFERENCES
- Isono, K. J. (1988) J. Antibiot. 41, 1711-1739
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- V á zquez, D. (1979) Inhibitors
of Protein Biosynthesis, Springer-Verlag, Berlin
- Cundliffe, E. (1989) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 43, 207-233
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Suhadolnik, R. J. (1981) in Antibiotics: Biosynthesis of the nucleoside antibiotics (Corcoran, J. W., ed) Vol. IV, pp. 353-370, Springer-Verlag,
Berlin
- Pattabiraman, T.
N., and Pogell, B. M. (1969) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 182, 245-247
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Rao, M. M., Rebello, P.
F., and Pogell, B. M. (1969) J. Biol. Chem. 244, 112-118
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vara, J.,
Pérez-González, J. A., and
Jiménez, A. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 8074-8081
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lacalle, R. A., Tercero,
J. A., Vara, J., and Jiménez, A. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 7474-7478
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tercero, J. A., Lacalle,
R. A., and Jiménez, A. (1993) Eur. J. Biochem. 218, 963-971
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lacalle, R. A., Tercero,
J. A., and Jiménez, A. (1992) EMBO J. 11, 785-792
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Lacalle, R. A., Pulido,
D., Vara, J., Zalacain, M., and Jiménez, A. (1989) Gene (Amst.) 79, 375-380
- Lacalle, R. A., Ruiz,
D., and Jiménez, A. (1991) Gene (Amst.) 109, 55-61
- Porter, J. N., Hewitt,
R. I., Hesseltine, C. W., Krupka, C. W., Lowery, J. A., Wallace, W. S.,
Bohonos, N., and Williams, J. H. (1952) Antibiot.
Chemother. 2, 409-415
- Hopwood, D. A., Bibb, M. J., Chater, K. F., Kieser, T.,
Bruton, C. J., Kieser, H. M., Lydiate, D. J., Smith, C. P., and Ward,
J. M. (1985) Genetic Manipulation of Streptomyces: A Laboratory
Manual, The John Innes Foundation, Norwich, UK
- Hanahan, D. (1985) in DNA Cloning: A Practical
Approach (Glover, D. M., ed) pp. 109-136, IRL Press, Oxford,
UK
- Brown, T. A. (1991) Molecular Biology ,
Labfax. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Manchester, UK
- Marinus, M. G., and
Morris, N. R. (1973) J. Bacteriol. 114, 1143-1150
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Katz, E., Thompson, C.
J., and Hopwood, D. A. (1983) J. Gen. Microbiol. 129, 2703-2714
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Vieira, J., and Messing,
J. (1982) Gene (Amst.) 19, 259-268
- Yanisch-Perron, C.,
Vieira, J., and Messing, J. (1985) Gene (Amst.) 33, 103-119
- Miller, J. F. (1992) A Short Course in Bacterial
Genetics. A Laboratory Manual and Handbook for Escherichia coli and
Related Bacteria, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring
Harbor, NY
- Sambrook, K. J., Fritsch, E. F., and
Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual ,
2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
- Sanger, F., Nicklen, S.,
and Coulson, A. R. (1977) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S.
A. 74, 5463-5467
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hopwood, D. A.,
Malpartida, F., Kieser, H. M., Ikeda, H., Duncan, J., Fujii, I., Rudd,
B. A. M., Floss, H. G., and Omura, S. (1985) Nature 314, 642-644
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Genetics
Computer Group (1994) Program Manual for the Wisconsin Package, Version 8, Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI
- Altschul, S. F., Gisch,
W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Marck, C. (1991) Strider , Centre
d'Etudes de Saclay, Gif-Sur-Yvette, Cedex, France
- Bibb, M. J., Findlay, P.
R., and Johnson, M. W. (1984) Gene (Amst.) 30, 157-166
- von Heijne, G. (1986) Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 4683-4690
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Mansouri, K., and
Piepersberg, W. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 228, 459-469
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Yasuhara, T., Nakai, T.,
and Ohashi, A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 13644-13650
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bergh, S., and
Uhlén, M. (1992) Gene (Amst.) 117, 131-136
- Koonin, E. V. (1993) Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 4847
[Free Full Text]
- Abeygunawardana, C.,
Weber, D. J., Frick, D. N., Bessman, M. J., and Mildvan, A. S. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 13071-13080
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Akiyama, M., Horiuchi,
T., and Sekiguchi, M. (1987) Mol. Gen. Genet. 206, 9-16
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bhatnagar, S. K.,
Bullions, L. C., and Bessman, M. J. (1991) J. Biol.
Chem. 266, 9050-9054
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Weber, D. J.,
Abeygunawardana, C., Bessman, M. J., and Mildvan, A. S. (1993) Biochemistry 32, 13081-13088
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Méjean,
V., Salles, C., Bullions, L. C., Bessman, M. J., and Claverys, J. P. (1994) Mol. Microbiol. 11, 323-330
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Kamath, A. V., and
Yanofsky, C. (1993) Gene (Amst.) 134, 99-102
- Mo, J. Y., Maki, H., and
Sekiguchi, M. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 11021-11025
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Maki, H., and Sekiguchi,
M. (1992) Nature 355, 273-275
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Bullions, L. C.,
Méjean, V., Claverys, J. P., and Bessman, M. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 12339-12344
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Leskiw, B. K., Bibb, M.
J., and Chater, K. F. (1991) Mol. Microbiol. 5, 2861-2867
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fakhrai, H., and Maines,
M. D. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 4023-4029
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kanagasundaram, V., and
Scopes, R. K. (1992) J. Bacteriol. 174, 1439-1447
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Sperka, S., Zehelein,
E., Fiedler, S., Fischer, S., Sommer, R., and Buckel, P. (1989) Nucleic Acids Res. 17, 5402
[Free Full Text]
- Peschke, U., Schmidt,
H., Zhang, H.-Z., and Piepersberg, W. (1995) Mol.
Microbiol. 16, 1137-1156
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Dhillon, N., Hale, R.
S., Cortes, J., and Leadlay, P. F. (1989) Mol.
Microbiol. 3, 1405-1414
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Jiang, X.-M., Neal, B.,
Santiago, F., Lee, S. J., Romana, L. K., and Reeves, P. R. (1991) Mol. Microbiol. 5, 695-713
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Takagi, M., Takada, H.,
and Imanaka, T. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 411-418
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Stutzman-Engwall, K. J.,
Otten, S. H., and Hutchinson, C. R. (1992) J.
Bacteriol. 174, 144-154
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Distler, J., Mansouri,
K., Mayer, G., Stockmann, M., and Piepersberg, W. (1992) Gene (Amst.) 115, 105-111
- Merson-Davies, L. A.,
and Cundliffe, E. (1994) Mol. Microbiol. 13, 349-355
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Thorson, J. S., Lo, S.
F., Liu, H.-W., and Hutchinson, C. R. (1993) J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 115, 6993-6994
[CrossRef]
- Liu, H.-W., and Thorson,
J. S. (1994) Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 48, 223-256
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Piepersberg, W. (1994) Crit. Rev. Biotech. 14, 251-285
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ingrosso, D., Fowler, A.
V., Bleibaum, J., and Clarke, S. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 20131-20139
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Wu, G., Williams, H. D.,
Zamanian, M., Gibson, F., and Poole, R. K. (1992) J.
Gen. Microbiol. 138, 2101-2112
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Kagan, R. M., and
Clarke, S. (1994) Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 310, 417-427
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Neuwald, A. F., York, J.
D., and Majerus, P. W. (1991) FEBS Lett. 294, 16-18
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Diehl, R., Whiting, P.,
Potter, J., Gee, N., Ragan, C., Linemeyer, D., Schoepfer, R., Bennett,
C., and Dixon, R. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265, 5946-5949
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Gläser,
H.-U., Thomas, D., Gaxiola, R., Montrichard, F., Surdin-Kerjan, Y., and
Serrano, R. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 3105-3110
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Neuwald, A. F.,
Krishnan, B. R., Brikun, I., Kulakauskas, S., Suziedelis, K.,
Tomcsanyi, T., Leyh, T. S., and Berg, D. E. (1992) J.
Bacteriol. 174, 415-425
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Bone, R., Springer, J.
P., and Atack, J. R. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.
S. A. 89, 10031-10035
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- York, J. D., and
Majerus, P. W. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87, 9548-9552
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Turner, D. H., Sugimoto,
N., Jaeger, J. A., Longfellow, C. E., Freier, S. M., and Kierzek, R. (1987) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 52, 123-133
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Deng, Z., Kieser, T.,
and Hopwood, D. A. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 2665-2675
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pulido, D., and
Jiménez, A. (1987) Nucleic Acids
Res. 15, 4227-4240
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Decker, H., and
Hutchinson, C. R. (1993) J. Bacteriol. 175, 3887-3892
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Madduri, K., and
Hutchinson, C. R. (1995) J. Bacteriol. 177, 1208-1215
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Petrich, A. K., Leskiw,
B. K., Paradkar, A. S., and Jensen, S. E. (1994) Gene (Amst.) 142, 41-48
- Shigeura, H. T., and
Boxer, G. E. (1964) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 17, 758-763
[CrossRef]
- Truman, J. T., and
Klenow, H. (1968) Mol. Pharmacol. 4, 77-86
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Armstrong, V. W., and
Eckstain, F. (1976) Eur. J. Biochem. 70, 33-38
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Hayakawa, H., Taketomi,
A., Sakumi, K., Kuwano, M., and Sekiguchi, M. (1995) Biochemistry 34, 89-95
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Shigeura, H. T., and
Gordon, C. N. (1965) J. Biol. Chem. 240, 806-810
[Free Full Text]
- Shigeura, H. T., Boxer,
G. E., Meloni, M. L., and Sampson, S. D. (1966) Biochemistry 5, 994-1004
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Ohashi, H., Matsuhashi,
M., and Matsuhashi, S. (1971) J. Biol. Chem. 246, 2325-2330
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Schimmel, P. R., and
Söll, D. (1979) Annu. Rev.
Biochem. 48, 601-648
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Von
D ö hren, H., Pfeifer, E., Van Liempt, H., Lee,
Y.-O., Pavela-Vrancic, M., and Schwecke, T. (1993) in Industrial
Microorganisms: Basic and Applied Molecular Genetics (Baltz, R.
H., Hegeman, G. D., and Skatrud, P. L., eds) pp. 159-167,
Washington, D.C.
- Heijenoort, J. V. (1994) in Bacterial Cell Wall (Ghuysen, J.-M., and Hakenbeck, R., eds)
pp. 39-55, Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam
- Van Liempt, H., von
Döhren, H., and Kleinkauf, H. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 3680-3684
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Haertlein, M., and
Madern, D. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 10199-10210
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Pérez-González,
J. A., Vara, J., and Jiménez, A. (1985) J. Gen. Microbiol. 131, 2877-2883
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fernández-Moreno,
M. A., Caballero, J. L., Hopwood, D. A., and Malpartida, F. (1991) Cell 66, 769-780
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Fernández-Moreno,
M. A., Martín-Triana, A. J.,
Martínez, E., Niemi, J., Kieser, H. M.,
Hopwood, D. A., and Malpartida, F. (1992) J.
Bacteriol. 174, 2958-2967
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Frick, D. N., and
Bessman, M. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 1529-1534
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hawkins, A. R., Lamb, H.
K., Smith, M., Keyte, J. W., and Roberts, C. F. (1988) Mol. Gen. Genet. 214, 224-231
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Geever, R. F., Huiet,
L., Baum, J. A., Tyler, B. M., Patel, V. B., Rutledge, B. J., Case, M.
E., and Giles, N. H. (1989) J. Mol. Biol. 207, 15-34
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Yano, R., Nagai, H.,
Shiba, K., and Yura, T. (1990) J. Bacteriol. 172, 2124-2130
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Johnston, M., Andrews,
S., Brinkman, R., Cooper, J., Ding, H., Dover, J., Du, Z., Favello, A.,
Fulton, L., and Gattung, S. (1994) Science 265, 2077-2082
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
E.-S. E. Habib, J. N. Scarsdale, and K. A. Reynolds
Biosynthetic Origin of Hygromycin A
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.,
July 1, 2003;
47(7):
2065 - 2071.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-S. Zhang, A. Stratmann, O. Block, R. Bruckner, M. Podeschwa, H.-J. Altenbach, U. F. Wehmeier, and W. Piepersberg
Biosynthesis of the C7-cyclitol Moiety of Acarbose in Actinoplanes Species SE50/110. 7-O-PHOSPHORYLATION OF THE INITIAL CYCLITOL PRECURSOR LEADS TO PROPOSAL OF A NEW BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAY
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 14, 2002;
277(25):
22853 - 22862.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. H. Ffrench-Constant, N. Waterfield, V. Burland, N. T. Perna, P. J. Daborn, D. Bowen, and F. R. Blattner
A Genomic Sample Sequence of the Entomopathogenic Bacterium Photorhabdus luminescens W14: Potential Implications for Virulence
Appl. Envir. Microbiol.,
August 1, 2000;
66(8):
3310 - 3329.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. F. Lozano, L. L. Remsing, L. M. Quiros, A. F. Brana, E. Fernandez, C. Sanchez, C. Mendez, J. Rohr, and J. A. Salas
Characterization of Two Polyketide Methyltransferases Involved in the Biosynthesis of the Antitumor Drug Mithramycin by Streptomyces argillaceus
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 4, 2000;
275(5):
3065 - 3074.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Gagnat, H. Chouayekh, C. Gerbaud, F. Francou, and M.-J. Virolle
Disruption of sblA in Streptomyces lividans permits expression of a heterologous {alpha}-amylase gene in the presence of glucose
Microbiology,
September 1, 1999;
145(9):
2303 - 2312.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. C. Espinosa, J. A. Tercero, M. A. Rubio, and A. Jiménez
The pur7 Gene from the Puromycin Biosynthetic pur Cluster of Streptomyces alboniger Encodes a Nudix Hydrolase
J. Bacteriol.,
August 15, 1999;
181(16):
4914 - 4918.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C.-G. Kim, T.-W. Yu, C. B. Fryhle, S. Handa, and H. G. Floss
3-Amino-5-hydroxybenzoic Acid Synthase, the Terminal Enzyme in the Formation of the Precursor of mC7N Units in Rifamycin and Related Antibiotics
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 13, 1998;
273(11):
6030 - 6040.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Bessman, D. N. Frick, and S. F. O'Handley
The MutT Proteins or ``Nudix'' Hydrolases, a Family of Versatile, Widely Distributed, ``Housecleaning'' Enzymes
J. Biol. Chem.,
October 11, 1996;
271(41):
25059 - 25062.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|