|
Volume 271, Number 30,
Issue of July 26, 1996
pp. 18074-18081
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Conserved Neuron Promoting Activity in Drosophila
and Vertebrate Laminin 1*
(Received for publication, December 13, 1995, and in revised form, April 29, 1996)
Yasumitsu
Takagi
§,
Motoyoshi
Nomizu
¶,
Donald
Gullberg
 ,
Albert J.
MacKrell
'',
Douglas R.
Keene
,
Yoshihiko
Yamada
¶ and
John H.
Fessler

From the Molecular Biology Institute and Biology
Department, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90095-1570, The Shriners Hospital for Crippled Children, Portland,
Oregon 97201, and the ¶ Laboratory of Developmental Biology,
NIDR, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
Drosophila S2 cells were transfected
with constructs that code for two portions of the
Drosophila laminin chain. Construct rec L coded for
domains III, I/II, and G of laminin . Construct rec S coded for
only the COOH-most 12% of the I/II domain and the G domain. The
corresponding polypeptides were isolated and characterized from the
culture media. The rec L chain partly formed disulfide-linked
heterotrimers with the endogenously produced and laminin
chains. Like normal Drosophila laminin, a substrate coating
of either rec L or rec S supported neuron differentiation and
neurite extension of primary Drosophila embryo cell
cultures. However, at the same low concentrations, only
Drosophila laminin-1, but neither rec L nor rec S
supported myogenesis in these cultures. Previously, an overlapping set
of dodecapeptides that covered a region of the murine laminin 1
chain similar to rec S had been synthesized and tested for cell
culture support properties (Nomizu, M., Kim, W. H., Yamamura, K.,
Utani, A., Otaka, A., Roller, P. P., Kleinman, H. K., and Yamada, Y. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 20583-20590). The
Drosophila laminin homologues of the six most active
vertebrate dodecapeptides were now synthesized and tested as
substrates for differentiation of primary Drosophila embryo
cells. Peptides that contained either the Drosophila
sequence SIKVGV or the murine homologue, SIKVAV, provided support for
neurite extension.
INTRODUCTION
Laminins are glycoproteins found mostly in the layers of
extracellular matrix (ECM)1 called basement
membranes. These underlie epithelial cells, envelop muscles and fat
cells, and are associated with the peripheral nervous system. In cell
cultures, laminins facilitate adhesion, spreading, and migration of
cells and form an excellent substrate for outgrowth of neurite
processes. Closely related laminins have been found in the basement
membranes of vertebrates and invertebrates (2), and the single laminin
reported so far in Drosophila melanogaster has been
characterized extensively (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). This report focusses on the actions
of portions of Drosophila laminin on the in vitro
differentiation of primary cell cultures obtained by dissociation of
late Drosophila gastrula embryos.
Each heterotrimeric laminin molecule contains one , , and chain (12, 13). The canonical mouse laminin-1, obtained from Engelbreth
Holmes Swarm tumor (EHS) (14), consists of 1, 1, and 1 chains
(Fig. 1a). The only Drosophila laminin molecule
described so far (Fig. 1b) consists of , , and chains (previously called A, B1, and B2) and now denoted for
specificity as D 65, D 28, and D 67. Each number refers to the
band of the Drosophila polytene chromosome map in which the
corresponding gene occurs. This nomenclature avoids potentially
erroneous assignments of Drosophila chains to vertebrate
counterparts and allows for discoveries of additional
Drosophila laminin chains. The three chains of each
heterotrimeric laminin molecule are associated through a triple-chained
coiled-coil of amphipathic helices, which forms the long arm of the
cross-shaped molecule visualized by electron microscopy. The three
chains are mutually disulfide-linked. The amino portion of each chain
forms a separate ``short arm'' that protrudes from the center of the
molecule. There are some significant sequence differences between these
regions of the mouse 1 and Drosophila chains (8, 10).
(This Drosophila D 65 chain is probably more closely
related to the very recently described vertebrate 5 chain (15).)
From the ends of the long arms, the COOH portions of the two chains
protrude as globular G domains, each consisting of 5 homologous
modules, G1-5.
Fig. 1.
Comparison of the structure of
Drosophila laminin and of recombinant forms of parts of its
chain with that of mouse laminin-1. Domains are indicated by
Roman numerals and letters. The modules G1-G5 of
the G domain are shown as five black dots. The approximate
sites of derivation of synthetic dodecapeptides mentioned in the text
are indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]
Major sites for cell binding of mouse laminin-1 have been ascribed to
the central regions of the cruciform structure and to the COOH-terminal
portion of the long arm (13, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). Portions of these sequences were
expressed as recombinant proteins, and functional activity of sequences
in the 1 chain near the peripheral end of the long arm may require
reconstitution with and chains (18, 19, 20). To examine the
potential contributions of the long arm and G domain regions of the
Drosophila chain, we now expressed portions of this chain in two recombinant forms rec L (Fig. 1c) and rec S
(Fig. 1d). Parts of vertebrate laminin chains have been
copied as synthetic peptides, which were then used for interaction
studies with cells (1, 17, 21, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28). Recently (1), this approach was
extended to cover the whole G domain of the mouse laminin 1 chain as
a nested set of dodecapeptides, and six peptides of particular
biological interest were identified as shown in Fig. 1a.
These peptides and their Drosophila laminin chain
homologues (Fig. 1b) were now tested for their action in
Drosophila primary cell cultures.
Laminin is one of the earliest ECM components to appear in
Drosophila embryos soon after gastrulation and accumulates
in increasing amounts during the embryonic differentiation and
development of epithelial, neuronal, and muscular tissues (3, 4, 5, 8, 9,
11, 29, 30). Successive expression of other ECM components, such as
collagen IV and tiggrin (11, 29, 30, 31) leads to complexes with laminin
that occur as electron microscopically distinct basement membranes (32,
33). Therefore, cells that interact with Drosophila laminin
in the embryo become successively exposed to additional matrix
components.
Drosophila laminin adsorbed as a layer on microscope
coverslips is an excellent substrate for the in vitro
differentiation of freshly dissociated Drosophila embryo
cells. This methodology was used here to test the effects of
recombinant Drosophila laminin chains and synthetic
peptides. As the primary cells differentiate in test culture, they
produce additional ECM components (34, 35). Thus, both in
vivo and in vitro, laminin, or laminin analogues,
initiate a chain of progressive substrate-cell interactions.
Laminin has diverse functions in Drosophila morphogenesis
(9, 11). LamA mutants that lack the laminin
D 65 chain die as late embryos with relatively slight abnormalities.
This suggests that other Drosophila laminin chains might
exist. The Drosophila integrin PS1 binds
Drosophila laminin. The site of binding is unknown and does
not involve an RGD sequence (36, 37). There must be additional receptor
mechanisms for this laminin (11, 35, 38).
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
DNA Constructs and Transfection of Drosophila Cells
Two
constructs, named rec S and rec L, were assembled from the partial
cDNAs A54, A31, A44, A126, and A127 of the Drosophila
laminin chain (7). Using the nucleotide sequence numbering of
Garrison et al. (7), rec S encompasses nt 2410-nt 6130 and rec L covers nt 63-nt 6130. The cDNAs coding for both
sequences share the DraI site at nt 6130. The 5 end of
rec S is the BspE1 site at nt 63, and of rec L is the
EcoRI site nt 6130. Both 5 ends were blunt-ended, and
NcoI linkers were added. The NcoI-DraI
fragments of both cDNAs were subcloned between the NcoI
and SmaI sites of a modified pBluescribe (Stratagene)
vector, whose EcoRI site had been changed into an
NcoI site. The constructs were excised between the
NcoI site and an SphI site in the vector. These
DNAs were then inserted into the expression vector pEV that had been
constructed as follows. There were inserted into pBluescribe: the hsp70
promoter (EcoRI-Asp718) taken from the vector
pHT4 (39), followed by an AUG start codon and signal sequence taken as
a 444-base pair fragment (nt 76-520) from the Drosophila bride
of sevenless (boss) gene (40), and a polyadenylation
sequence taken from the pHT4 vector as a
HindIII-HindIII fragment (39). The integrity of
this pEV vector was checked by restriction site analysis. Then the
above DNA, coding for either the rec L or the rec S sequence, was
inserted into vector pEV between an NcoI site in the
boss segment and an SphI site of pBluescribe
between the boss and polyadenylation segments.
Drosophila S2 cells (41) were transfected by calcium
phosphate coprecipitation with either the expression plasmid for
rec S, or for rec L, together with the plasmid pPC4 which encodes
the -amanitin-resistant Drosophila RNA polymerase II gene
(42). Cotransfection and the selection of -amanitin-resistant cell
clones were performed as described (43). After exposure of the cells to
-amanitin for 2 weeks, they were maintained in drug-free M3 medium
containing 2% fetal calf serum at 25 °C.
Production, Isolation, and Analysis of Recombinant
Proteins
Transfected cells were heat-shocked at 37 °C for 30 min in the presence of fetal calf serum, resuspended in serum-free M3
medium, and, after 6 h culture at 25 °C, the conditioned medium
was collected. Proteins that precipitated from the medium at 45%
saturation with (NH4)2SO4 were
dialyzed into PBS, pH 7.2, and adsorbed onto a Heparin-Sepharose CL-4B
column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) that had been equilibrated with PBS.
After washing with the same buffer, proteins were eluted with PBS
containing 1 M NaCl and were then applied to a Superose 6 column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) in 0.3 M sucrose, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.1% Triton X-100, 30 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.6. The molecular sieve column was developed with the same buffer to
separate the different laminin constituents. For further purification,
each set of pooled fractions was applied to a Mono Q ion exchange
column (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) in 0.3 M sucrose, 0.1%
Triton X-100, 30 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.25, and the bound
proteins were eluted with a 0-0.5 M NaCl gradient in this
buffer. Prior to their use as cell culture substrates, the purified
recombinant proteins were again adsorbed onto Heparin-Sepharose CL-4B
and, after removing Triton X-100 detergent by extensive washing with
PBS, the proteins were eluted with 1 M NaCl in PBS and then
dialyzed into PBS. The normal laminin that was used as a cell culture
substrate was isolated from Drosophila Kc cell culture
medium as described (44). Purification steps were monitored by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, silver staining, and Western
blots using standard procedures (45). The primary antibodies for
Western blots were rabbit polyclonal antibodies that recognize all
three subunits of Drosophila laminin (44), and the secondary
antibodies were goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to alkaline phosphatase
(Promega). Deglycosylation with peptide:N-glycosidase F
(PNGase F) (New England Biolabs) was carried out according to the
manufacturer's protocol. For electron microscopy, the isolated
proteins were dissolved in 0.2 M
NH4HCO3, mixed with glycerol, sprayed onto
mica, and rotary-shadowed (46). Prints made at × 100,000 magnification were scanned at 600 dpi with a Relisys 9624 scanner.
Image thread lengths were determined with a Power MacIntosh computer
and the software NIH Image version 1.58.
Test Cell Cultures
Primary cell cultures were established
from D. melanogaster Oregon R post-gastrula embryos (3-4.5
h after egg laying) that had been sterilized with 1:10 diluted
saponated cresol solution (Japanese Pharmacopoeia). Cells were isolated
from the mechanically disrupted embryos as described and suspended in
D-22 medium at 3 × 106 cells/ml (34, 35). Each
autoclaved glass coverslip (Corning, 18 mm) was incubated overnight at
4 °C with the specified laminin or recombinant protein coating
solution, rinsed with PBS and D-22 medium, and placed in a 35-mm
diameter dish (Falcon) to which 1.0 ml of cell suspension was then
added.
For studies on synthetic peptide substrates, Drosophila
homologues of cell biologically active mouse laminin peptides (1) were
chosen from alignments of the Drosophila and mouse laminin
1 sequences made with the Clustal V program (public domain software
of Dr. D. Higgins, European Molecular Biology Laboratory). The
dodecapeptides were manually synthesized by the
9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl strategy and prepared in the COOH-terminal
amide form as described (1). The identities of the peptides were
confirmed by amino acid analysis and fast atom bombardment mass
spectral analysis. 100 µl of peptide solution, containing 50 µg of
peptide and 25 µg of BSA dissolved in Milli-Q water, was layered onto
a glass coverslip and allowed to dry overnight. A cell suspension was
then added as above. Control experiments showed that addition of BSA
suppressed nonspecific neurite extension that otherwise occurred to
some extent with all highly concentrated peptides. Attachment assays of
human fibrosarcoma HT-1080 cells to coatings of dodecapeptides and to
mouse laminin-1, prepared from EHS tumor, were made as described
previously (1). In this method, the coatings in 96-well plates are
blocked with BSA and the subsequently attached cells are stained with
crystal violet, washed, lysed with SDS, and the optical density at 560 nm is measured.
Cultures were incubated for the specified times or overnight at
25 °C, washed, and prepared for immunofluorescence analysis as
described (34). Primary antibodies were as follows.
Drosophila PS integrins were stained with the monoclonal
antibody CF.6G11 (47). Muscle myosin was detected with muscle-specific,
rabbit polyclonal antibodies kindly provided by Dr. D. Kiehart (48).
The neural cell-specific monoclonal antibody against ELAV protein was a
gift of Dr. L. Zipursky. Neural cells were also detected with
fluorescein-conjugated goat IgG against horseradish peroxidase (HRP)
purchased from Cappel (49). The secondary antibodies were
fluorescein-labeled anti-rabbit or rhodamine-labeled anti-mouse goat
IgGs (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories). Cultures were examined with a
Zeiss Axiophot microscope equipped for epifluorescence, using 100× and
40× oil objectives.
RESULTS
Production and Properties of Recombinant Laminin Chains
Two variants of the Drosophila laminin chain were expressed in Drosophila S2 cells. The smaller
one, rec S (amino acid residues 2625-3712 of the chain)
comprises the COOH terminus of the laminin chain and consists of
the total G domain plus an adjacent 12% of the I/II domain that is
part of the distal end of the trimeric molecule's long arm and
contains the sequence IKVGV (Fig. 1d). A
peptide corresponding to the homologous mouse 1 laminin sequence,
IKVAV, competes with mouse laminin in cell spreading, migration, and
neurite outgrowth tests (24). The larger construct, rec L, contains
all of rec S and continues farther toward the NH2 end
(residues 1784-3712) to encompass all of domain I/II and 97% of
domain III (Fig. 1c). DNA coding for the
Drosophila hsp 70 promoter and for a signal sequence was
placed 5 to each construct. Drosophila S2 cells were
permanently transfected with the corresponding plasmids and
heat-shocked. The secreted laminin proteins were isolated from the
culture medium by heparin-Sepharose affinity chromatography. Gel sieve
chromatography on Superose 6 partially separated the minor amounts of
endogenously produced, disulfide-linked Drosophila laminin
( , , ) from a mixture of disulfide-linked heterotrimer
(rec L, , ) and rec L molecules and these from smaller
molecular weight contaminating proteins. Ion exchange chromatography on
a Mono Q column removed the remaining contaminants and further
separated the various forms of laminin (Fig. 2).
Untransfected S2 host cells secrete small amounts of the normal,
trimeric Drosophila laminin molecules, each consisting of
disulfidelinked , , and chains (Fig. 2h). The
successive order of elution from the Mono Q column by a 0-0.5
M NaCl gradient was: rec L (Fig. 2i), then the
disulfide-linked heterotrimer (rec L, , ) (shown after reduction
in Fig. 2j) followed by a mixture of this material with the
endogenous Drosophila laminin heterotrimer ( , , )
(Fig. 2k) and finally the endogenous trimer alone (Fig.
2h). The rec S protein was isolated by the same
preparative steps from correspondingly transfected cells and is
demonstrated in Fig. 2g and, after reduction, in Fig.
2e. All these materials reacted with antiserum raised
against endogenous laminin (3), as shown in the Western blot (Fig. 2,
h-k). The rec L polypeptide was recovered from the
conditioned medium largely as individual chains, but a small portion
had also formed the disulfide-linked trimer (rec L, , ), as
demonstrated in Fig. 2j and in the silver-stained Fig. 2,
a and c. Although heat shock induction had caused
production of a large excess of the rec L chain over the resident laminin chain, the two heterotrimers (rec L, , ) and
( , , ) were present in comparable amounts. The electrophoretic
mobility of the rec L polypeptide fraction decreased
slightly on reduction, indicating intrachain disulfide bridges and lack
of interchain disulfide links (not shown). The reduced rec L chains
migrated slightly slower than the Drosophila chain (Fig.
2, i and h). Digestion of the recombinant
proteins with endoglycosidase PNGaseF caused a slight increase in
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis electrophoretic mobility, as
shown for rec S in Fig. 2, e and f, indicating
attachment of N-linked oligosaccharides to the recombinant
laminin chains. All the laminin forms were bound by
heparin-Sepharose.
Fig. 2.
Electrophoretic analyses on 4.5%
polyacrylamide gels of recombinant Drosophila laminin
products isolated from cell culture media. Peptides are visualized
by silver staining in lanes a-g and by antibodies against
Drosophila laminin in lanes h-k of a Western
blot. Normal Drosophila laminin is shown after and before
reduction with dithiothreitol (dtt) in lanes b
and d, and the purified heterotrimer (rec L, , ) in
lanes a and c. Lanes h-k compare, after
reduction, the chain composition of chromatographically fractionated
laminins: endogenously made laminin (h), rec L
(i), the recombinant heterotrimer (rec L, , )
(j), and a mixture of the recombinant and endogenous
heterotrimers (k). Lanes e-g show purified
rec S before (g) and after reduction (e), and
the effect of digestion with endoglycosidase PNGaseF
(f).
[View Larger Version of this Image (47K GIF file)]
Electron micrographs of the sprayed and rotary-shadowed laminin
products are shown in Fig. 3. The appearance of the
endogenous heterotrimeric laminin (Fig. 3a) agrees with that
previously reported for laminin isolated from Drosophila Kc
cells (3, 50). One of the short arms is distinctly longer
than those of the other two, and the peripheral end of the long arm
carries two globules, corresponding to modules (G1-G2-G2) and (G3-G5),
separated by a spacer (3, 7, 50). In contrast, the recombinant
heterotrimer (rec L, , ) (Fig. 3b) has one short arm
which is shorter than the other two short arms, but also has
the two globular G regions at the end of the long arm. The mean lengths
of the long arms of these two types of heterotrimeric molecules were
identical (within ±6% of the thread length from the cross to the
start of the nearest G globule). Images of rec L molecules, not
combined with either or chains, were also obtained. A recurrent
appearance was a long, thread-like portion, either with or without a
globule of varying size at one end (Fig. 3c). The ratio of
this thread length to that of the thread portion of the heterotrimeric
long arms (cross-intersection to proximal edge of G globules) was
0.9 ± 0.1 (means of 22 images of each). It is likely that these
images of rec L represent either homotrimers ((rec L)3)
or homodimers ((rec L)2). The unpaired -helical domain
I/II of a single laminin chain would not be expected to survive as
a rod-like thread through the preparation of spraying and rotary
shadowing. Among the mostly globular rec S material, a significant
number of paired dot images were seen, corresponding to the (G1-G2-G2)
and (G3-G5) separated by their spacer (Fig. 3d).
Fig. 3.
Electron micrographs of sprayed and
rotary-shadowed Drosophila laminin molecules ( , , )
are shown in a, heterotrimers (rec L, , ) in
b, rec L molecules in c, and rec S in
d. The scale bar represents 100 nm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (141K GIF file)]
Primary Cell Culture on Recombinant Laminin Forms
Primary
Drosophila cells, obtained by dissociation of post-gastrula
embryos, differentiate into several cell types during short term
culture on a laminin substrate, in the absence of added serum (34, 35).
We tested the ability of purified rec L and rec S to substitute for
laminin in such cultures. Our available quantities of purified,
heterotrimeric (rec L, , ) were insufficient for this assay. The
differentiation of primary cells into epithelia and muscle was
monitored by morphological appearance and by staining with antibodies
against the PS subunit of PS integrins and against
muscle myosin (34). Coverslips were coated with laminin (100 µg/ml),
rec L, and rec S solutions. The laminin and rec S solutions were
equimolar. On laminin substrates, clusters of epithelial cells appeared
(Fig. 4a) and multinucleate myotubes formed
by fusion of myoblasts (Fig. 4c). Laminin coatings made from
more dilute solutions, equimolar with the rec L solution used for the
results of Fig. 4, also had myoblast promoting activity. In contrast,
on rec L only slight, rudimentary epithelial-like structures formed
(Fig. 4b), and most of the myoblasts either remained unfused
or failed to show significant elongation, although the above antigens
were expressed (Fig. 4d). The results with rec S are not
shown as they were very similar to those demonstrated for rec L in
Fig. 4. Control coatings of bovine serum albumin (BSA) gave poor or no
differentiation (not shown). Thus, rec L and rec S were unable to
replace laminin as a support for the differentiation of epithelia and
muscle under these conditions. In principle, a better comparison
standard for these recombinant proteins would have been isolated
Drosophila laminin chains, but these could not be
obtained without disrupting their intra-chain disulfide
bridges and their native folding.
Fig. 4.
Inadequate epithelial and myogenic
differentiation on rec L. Primary embryo cells were grown for
18 h on either laminin (a, c) or rec L
(b, d) substrates and then immunostained either
for PS integrins (a, b) or for muscle-specific
myosin (c, d). Bar equals 18 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (80K GIF file)]
Vertebrate neurite outgrowth is promoted by the COOH portion of
mammalian laminin (16, 22). Differentiation of Drosophila
neurites, with extensive arborization of neurite processes, occurs in
embryo primary cells cultured on a Drosophila laminin
substrate (34, 35). Primary embryo cell cultures were grown on
substrates of rec L, rec S, and BSA and then double-stained for two
neuron-specific epitopes. An early nuclear marker of neurons is the
ELAV protein, which is expressed from the embryonic lethal
abnormal visual system (elav) gene when neuronal precursor cells
differentiate into neurons (51). A second marker was a neuron-specific,
cell surface carbohydrate epitope that binds anti-horseradish
peroxidase (HRP) antibodies (49).
During the initial few hours of culture, similar changes were observed
in primary cultures grown on substrates of either laminin or BSA. The
ELAV-positive cells increased on both. After a 3-h culture on BSA, some
cells were neuron-positive as indicated by the nuclear ELAV marker
(Fig. 5a), but only few of these also
expressed the neuron-specific cell surface marker (Fig. 5b).
The clusters of ELAV-positive cells increased in size and probably in
cell number, but it was difficult to count the cells reliably within
bunched clusters. After a 9-h culture on BSA, there were more
ELAV-positive nuclei, (Fig. 5e), but only a subset of the
rounded cells showed the neuron cell surface marker (Fig.
5f). In contrast, after a 9-h culture on laminin, ample
clusters of cells expressed the nuclear ELAV marker (Fig.
5c) and strongly the anti-HRP neuron surface marker, which
also highlighted initial neurite extensions (Fig. 5d).
Further elongation of neurite extensions occurred in parallel with
expansion of neuronal clusters, and, after 20 h of culture, long,
extensive, and branching neurite projections were observed by anti-HRP
antibody staining of cultures grown on laminin (Fig. 5g),
rec L (Fig. 5h), and rec S (Fig. 5i). In
contrast, after a 20-h culture on BSA, clusters of cells stained by
anti-HRP remained rounded, without neurite processes (Fig.
5j), and had changed little from their initial, earlier
appearance (Fig. 5f). At longer times, some projections
eventually appeared, which we ascribe to laminin or other ECM proteins
that are elaborated by the mixed primary cells themselves on prolonged
culture (34). A sporadic appearance of neurite extensions on uncoated
glass surfaces in these cultures was blocked by a 1-h exposure of
coverslips to 5% BSA solution just before applying the primary cells.
The same BSA treatment did not abolish the neurite promoting activities
of the natural and recombinant Drosophila laminin proteins.
We conclude that rec L and rec S support neurite differentiation
and outgrowth.
Fig. 5.
Neurite differentiation of primary embryo
cells on substrates of laminin, rec L, and rec S. Cells were
grown for either 3 h (a, b), 9 h
(c-f), or 20 h (g-j), on either laminin
(La) (c, d, g), rec L
(h), rec S (i), or BSA (a,
b, e, f, j). Cells were
stained with antibodies against the neuron-specific nuclear protein
ELAV (a, c, e), and with aHRP
antibodies that specifically react with a Drosophila neuron
cell surface epitope (b, d, f,
g, h, i, j). Image pairs
(ab, cd, ef) were double-immunostained
with rhodamine and fluorescein second antibodies. Bar equals
18 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (108K GIF file)]
Primary Cell Culture on Synthetic Peptides
Nomizu et
al. (1) synthesized a set of overlapping dodecapeptides that
covers that region of the mouse laminin 1 sequence which
corresponds, approximately, to rec S. Table I and Fig.
1a show the six most interesting mouse peptides of this set
(LAM-L, AG-10, AG-22, AG-32, AG-56, and AG-73) as judged by their
effects on several vertebrate cell lines in cell attachment, spreading,
inhibition of these processes by antibodies against integrin chains
2, 3, 6, and 1 and attachment to a mouse laminin substrate
(1, 24, 28, 52). A corresponding set of six Drosophila
dodecapeptides was synthesized and named DOR-12, DG-10, DG-22, DG-32,
DG-56, and DG-73 (Table I). Each of these peptides is the
Drosophila homologue of the correspondingly paired mouse
peptide. An additional dodecapeptide was made, LAM-RM. This corresponds
to a mouse peptide that was found to react well with the
Drosophila cells, LAM-L, except that the original order of
five centrally placed amino acid residues, IKVAV, was scrambled to
VVIAK (Tables I and II). Freshly prepared Drosophila embryo
primary cells were seeded onto coverslips coated with a mixture of one
dodecapeptide and BSA. After 15 h of culture, the neurite
outgrowths were visualized by staining with anti-HRP antibodies. Some
of the results are illustrated in Fig. 6.
Table I.
The principal murine peptides that were derived from the mouse laminin
1 sequence and bound to vertebrate cells are compared with their
Drosophila homologues
| Peptide |
Sequence |
Position |
Identity
|
|
| LAM-L |
AASIKVAVSADR |
2097
-2107 |
6 /12 (50%)
|
| DOR-12 |
ANSIKVGVNFKP |
2568 -2579
|
| LAM-RM |
AASVVIAKSADR |
|
2 /12 (17%)
|
| AG-10 |
NRWHSIYITRFG |
2183 -2194 |
4 /12
(33%) |
| DG-10 |
GRWYQAVVDRMG |
2761 -2772
|
| AG-22 |
SSFHFDGSGYAM |
2290 -2301 |
4 /12
(33%) |
| DG-22 |
TGLRFKGNGYVQ |
2877 -2888
|
| AG-32 |
TWYKIAFQRNRK |
2370 -2381 |
3 /12
(25%) |
| DG-32 |
QWHKVQAERENR |
2959 -2970
|
| AG-56 |
SLVRNRRVITIQ |
2570 -2581 |
0 /12
(0%) |
| DG-56 |
TVQHTQGELRLT |
3038 -3049
|
| AG-73 |
RKRLQVQLSIRT |
2719 -2730 |
4 /12
(33%) |
| DG-73 |
RRHHDIGISFRT |
3370 -3381 |
|
Fig. 6.
Neurite outgrowths from primary embryo cells
cultured for 15 h on different dodecapeptides and then stained
with neuron-specific aHRP antibodies. Drosophila peptide
DOR-12 (a) is the homologue of the mouse peptide LAM-L
(b). Key portions of the dodecapeptide amino acid sequences
are shown. The mouse peptide LAM-RM (c) differs from LAM-L
only in the portion of sequence shown. DG-22 is another active
Drosophila dodecapeptide (d), and AG-22 is its
murine homologue (e). (See Table I, Fig. 7, and text for
related details.) Bar equals 25 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (100K GIF file)]
Under the conditions of this experiment, the best neurite outgrowths
were shown on the Drosophila peptides DOR-12 (Fig.
6a) and DG-22 (Fig. 6d). For the corresponding
mouse peptide homologues, LAM-L (Fig. 6b) had activity, but
the AG-22 peptide had practically none (Fig. 6e). The
scrambled mouse peptide, LAM-RM, showed very little activity (Fig.
6c) and had been found to be inactive in mammalian cell
attachment tests (28). While the peptides that supported neurite
outgrowth clearly differed from those that failed to do so, it was not
possible to devise meaningful finer, quantitative comparisons between
their actions. Only a portion of these mixed, primary embryo cells were
neurons, the number of neurons in brightly fluorescent clusters could
not be determined precisely and a variety of neurite processes
projected from cell groups. We conclude that the cell biological
activity originally described for the mouse sequence IKVAV, that occurs
in the peptide LAM-L, is also active in promoting neurite outgrowth in
Drosophila primary embryo cell cultures, as is the
Drosophila homologous sequence IKVGV of the peptide DOR-12.
Correspondingly, this Drosophila IKVGV sequence had some
cell binding action on mammalian cells, as is shown in Fig.
7. To some extent this mammalian HT1080 cell line
attached to the two Drosophila peptides DOR-12 and DG-22,
but this effect was distinctly weaker than binding to the homologous
mouse peptides, respectively, LAM-L and AG-22. Thus, the sequence
similarity of the mouse IKVAV and the Drosophila IKVGV
sequences is mirrored by functional homology. These sequences
occur embedded in dodecapeptides that have 50% amino acid
identity (Tables I and II), suggesting evolutionary conservation.
Fig. 7.
Attachment assays of human fibrosarcoma
HT-1080 cells to substrates of mouse EHS laminin and to several
dodecapeptides mentioned in the text. The ordinate is a
measure of the cells bound, which were stained with crystal violet and
then solubilized.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]
In previous tests of the mouse dodecapeptides on mammalian cells, the
peptide AG-73 showed high activity (1). This peptide also partly
promoted Drosophila neurite outgrowth in the presence of
BSA. Yet its Drosophila positional homologue, the
dodecapeptide DG-73, was inactive. Although these two dodecapeptides
have 33% amino acid identity, the core sequence LQVQLSIR of AG-73,
that had been established to be essential for its action on mammalian
cells (1), only shares one amino acid residue with the
Drosophila peptide DG-73. Thus, while the
Drosophila cells can respond to the mammalian amino acid
sequence to some extent, this portion of the Drosophila
laminin chain presumably evolved differently from its mouse
homologue. All additional Drosophila dodecapeptides listed
in Table I failed to promote Drosophila neurite outgrowth in
the presence of BSA.
DISCUSSION
The portions of the Drosophila laminin chain that
were expressed as rec L and rec S in Drosophila cells
are likely to have been normally glycosylated, folded and
disulfide-linked, and secreted. This is suggested particularly by the
electron microscopic appearance of the heterotrimer (rec L, , ):
a long arm of the same length as normal Drosophila laminin,
two globular G domains, two short arms, and one very short arm.
Similarly to normal Drosophila laminin, all the laminin
constructs were retained by heparin-Sepharose. The rec L chain was
recognized by the and chains, became interchain
disulfide-linked with them, and was normally secreted. However,
although the rec L chain was produced in considerable excess over the
resident laminin chain, comparable amounts of the trimers
(rec L, , ) and ( , , ) formed. Perhaps the chain is
better suited for trimer formation than the rec L chain, but, more
likely, a substantial portion of the rec L chains formed homodimers
or trimers and thereby became unavailable for heterotrimer
formation.
Partial association of rec L chains into homomeric, coiled-coil
amphipathic helices is suggested by the electron microscopic finding of
thread-like molecules with a globular end, as a thread consisting of a
single -helically coiled polypeptide is rarely visualized (53). As
the rec L threads are only 0.9 ± 0.1 times the length of the
normal long arm of laminin and have variable terminal knobs, there is
probably some collapse of structure at the ends of the putative
homomeric associations of the rec L chain, as compared with
(rec L, , ) heterotrimers. Molecular sieve chromatography of
rec L also suggests association in solution. The heterotrimer
(rec L, , ) co-eluted with rec L, and this mixture eluted as
somewhat smaller material than the native, heterotrimeric laminin
( , , ) of Mr = 784,000. One would not
expect a single rec L chain (Mr = 210,000) to have a molecular sieving behavior that closely
resembles its heterotrimer with the paired and chains
(Mr = 585,000). On a calibrated Sepharose
6 column, the heterotrimer (rec L, , ) eluted ahead of the
globular-plus-arms 510-kDa protein peroxidasin (44). The rod-shaped,
coiled-coil stabilized forms of rec L are calculated to have
Mr = 420,000 for the homodimer or
Mr = 660,000 for the homotrimer. While
coiled-coil interactions of vertebrate laminin 1 chains are opposed
by repulsive electrical charges (54), the different charge distribution
along the I/II domain of Drosophila laminin 65 would
probably not hinder homomeric
association.2
The G-domain regions of rec S (Mr = 110,000)
folded into a disulfide-linked structure with the appropriate
biglobular electron microscopic appearance (Fig. 3) (3, 50) and eluted
from Sepharose 6 near the mostly globular protein glutactin
(Mr = 116,000). A coating of rec S protein
supported neuron differentiation in primary embryo cell culture, as
judged by the appearance of two neuron-specific epitope markers and the
extension of neurites. An additional coating of BSA did not abolish
this action of our recombinant protein, but did block spurious neurite
extension on uncoated glass surfaces. Correspondingly, the larger
recombinant protein rec L, which contains the sequence of rec S,
also supported this cell differentiation. This contrasts with reports
of the support of cell attachment and differentiation of the
proteolytic fragment E8 of mouse laminin-1 (16, 20) and of the action
of a recombinant form of the vertebrate G-domain (19). These
investigators concluded that only laminin-1 fragments that also
contained portions of the laminin 1 and 1 chains retained such
cell biological functions of the complete laminin-1 molecule. Our
peptide studies indicate that the neurite promoting action of the
rec S protein will be associated, at least in part, with the SIKVGV
sequence that is contained within the 12% of the Drosophila
laminin domain I/II at the NH2 end of rec S. This
NH2 terminus is unlikely to be stabilized by coiled-coil
-helical interactions as molecular sieve criteria indicate rec S
to be monomeric.
Neither myogenesis nor the differentiation of epithelia from primary
cells were supported by either the rec S or the rec L substrates at
the concentrations that were available from these purified recombinant
materials. The molarity of the most concentrated rec S solution that
could be tested for coating was 5-fold greater than the most dilute
Drosophila laminin solution that supported differentiation.
We do not know whether the different materials adsorbed comparably onto
the glass surfaces. Although the coatings of rec L functioned as
supports for neurite extension, their concentrations may have been
inadequate for myogenesis. While the nominal molarity of the rec L
solution that was used for coating equalled that of a laminin solution
that provided an adequate coating, the effective molarity of the
rec L solution would have been decreased by chain association into
homodimers or homotrimers. Our limited negative evidence suggests that
the region of Drosophila laminin represented by rec S may
by itself be insufficient for the support of myogenesis.
There exists a striking parallelism between results with homologous
peptides of the form IKV(G/A)V derived from the Drosophila
and mouse laminin 1 chains. In the tests of neuronal differentiation
and neurite extension, the two Drosophila dodecapeptides
which had the best, equally good, effects on Drosophila
primary cells were AnSIKVgVnfkp (DOR-12) and peptide DG-22. The murine
dodecapeptides that had the most pronounced effect on vertebrate cells
were AaSIKVaVsadr (LAM-L) (28, 52) and peptide AG-73 (1). While
peptides DG-22 and AG-73 are unrelated, the dodecapeptides AnSIKVgVnfkp
(DOR-12) and AaSIKVaVsadr (LAM-L) have 50% amino acid identity and
occupy homologous positions in the Drosophila and murine
laminin 1 chains (Table II). It is noteworthy that
these sequences are part of a larger region that is strongly conserved
in the vertebrate laminin 1 and 2 chains and retains homology in
3, 4, and 5 (Table II). Furthermore, over this larger region
there is 100% amino acid conservation for the respective murine and
human laminin 1 and 2 chains. The dodecapeptide AaSIKVaVsadr
(LAM-L) was also the only murine peptide that had some action on the
Drosophila cells. Rearrangement of only the central, IKVaV
portion of this sequence to VVIaK in dodecapeptide LAM-RM (Table II)
abolished this activity (Fig. 6, b and c). In the
reciprocal test, the Drosophila dodecapeptides ANSIKVGVNFKP
(DOR-12) and DG-22 had weak binding actions on vertebrate cells (Fig.
7). The murine dodecapeptide AaSIKVaVsadr (LAM-L) promoted neurite
extension of mammalian PC12 cells, as did the Drosophila
dodecapeptides ANSIKVGVNFKP (DOR-12) (52). The failure of action on
Drosophila cells of the murine peptides AG-22 and AG-73 is
directly correlated with inadequate amino acid identity between these
murine and Drosophila amino acid sequences in regions known
to be important for action on murine cells (1).
The progressive differentiation of various cell types in
Drosophila primary embryo cell cultures mirrors in
vivo processes, as instanced by successive changes in gene
expression and morphology (29, 34, 35). Our tests of these cultures on
substrates prepared from dilute solutions of Drosophila
rec L and rec S proteins are extensions of these studies of normal
processes. In contrast, the deposits of synthetic peptides at high
concentrations provide pharmacological tests of cell responses. Yet the
positive evidence of both types of results suggests that the
evolutionary retention of the A(N/A)SIKV(G/A)V sequence in the
mammalian and Drosophila laminin chains is related to a
shared function of interaction with cells, as shown particularly in the
processes of neurite extension. The rec L and rec S proteins
promote neurite outgrowth, and both contain the sequence ARQLANSIKVGV.
In addition, peptides containing the Drosophila and mouse
versions of the sequence were unique in their ability to promote
adhesion of both Drosophila and mammalian cells. While we
must interpret these results with caution, we find the correlation
between results obtained with these peptides and with laminin fragments
striking. Other sequences will contribute to the adhesion of cells to
laminin chains, yet it would appear that an evolutionarily
conserved role of laminin in development and differentiation is
mediated, at least in part, by these conserved sequences.
FOOTNOTES
*
This research was supported in part by National Institutes
of Health Grant AG02128 (to J. H. F.). Electron microscopy was
supported by grants from the Shriners Hospital for Crippled Children,
the R. Blaine Bramble Medical Research Foundation, and the Fred Meyer
Charitable Trust Foundation. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
Recipient of a fellowship from the Japanese Foundation for Aging
and Health.
Recipient of a fellowship from the Swedish Natural Science
Research Council. Current address: Dept. of Animal Physiology,
University of Uppsala, Uppsala S 75123, Sweden.
''
Current address: Kenneth Norris Jr. Cancer Center, University of
Southern California Medical School, Los Angeles, CA 90033.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Molecular Biology
Institute, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1570. Tel.: 310-825-4267; Fax:
310-206-7286; E-mail: fessler{at}ewald.mbi.ucla.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: ECM, extracellular
matrix; nt, nucleotide(s); PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; BSA, bovine
serum albumin; HRP, horseradish peroxidase.
2
K. Beck, personal communication.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs. Konrad Beck, Liselotte Fessler,
Volker Hartenstein, and Lawrence Zipursky for valuable discussions and
much appreciate the expert technical assistance of Catherine Rigway
for electron microscopy. We appreciate reagents and instruments made
available to us by Drs. L. Zipursky, D. Brower, D. Kiehart, and U. Banerjee.
REFERENCES
-
Nomizu, M.,
Kim, W. H.,
Yamamura, K.,
Utani, A.,
Song, S. Y.,
Otaka, A.,
Roller, P. P.,
Kleinman, H. K.,
Yamada, Y.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
20583-20590
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Har-El, R.,
Tanzer, M. L.
(1993)
FASEB J.
7,
1115-1123
[Abstract]
-
Fessler, L. I.,
Campbell, A. G.,
Duncan, K. G.,
Fessler, J. H.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
2383-2391
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Montell, D. J.,
Goodman, C. S.
(1988)
Cell
53,
463-473
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Montell, D. J.,
Goodman, C. S.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
2441-2453
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chi, H.,
Hui, C.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
1543-1550
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Garrison, K.,
MacKrell, A. J.,
Fessler, J. H.
(1991)
J. Biol. Chem.
266,
22899-22904
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kusche-Gullberg, M.,
Garrison, K.,
MacKrell, A. J.,
Fessler, L. I.,
Fessler, J. H.
(1992)
EMBO J.
11,
4519-4527
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Henchcliffe, C.,
García-Alonso, A. L.,
Tang, J.,
Goodman, C. S.
(1993)
Development
118,
325-337
[Abstract]
-
MacKrell, A. J.,
Kusche-Gullberg, M.,
Garrison, K.,
Fessler, J. H.
(1993)
FASEB J.
7,
375-381
[Abstract]
-
Fessler, J. H.,
Takagi, Y.,
Fessler, L. I.
(1996)
The Laminins
(Ekblom, P.,
Timpl, R.,
eds)
, p. 235, Harwood
Academic Publishers, Amsterdam
-
Burgeson, R. E.,
Chiquet, M.,
Deutzmann, R.,
Engel, J.,
Kleinman, H.,
Martin, G.,
Meneguzzi, G.,
Paulsson, M.,
Sanes, J.,
Timpl, R.,
Tryggvason, K.,
Yamada, Y.,
Yurchenco, P.
(1994)
Matrix Biol.
14,
209-211
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Timpl, R.,
Brown, J. C.
(1994)
Matrix Biol.
14,
275-281
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Beck, K.,
Hunter, I.,
Engel, J.
(1990)
FASEB J.
4,
148-160
[Abstract]
-
Miner, J. H.,
Lewis, R. M.,
Sanes, J. R.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
28523-28526
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Deutzmann, R.,
Aumailley, M.,
Wiedemann, H.,
Pysny, W.,
Timpl, R.,
Edgar, D.
(1990)
Eur. J. Biochem.
191,
513-522
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gehlsen, K. R.,
Sriramarao, P.,
Furcht, L. T.,
Skubitz, A. P.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
117,
449-459
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yurchenco, P. D.,
Sung, U.,
Ward, M. D.,
Yamada, Y.,
O'Rear, J. J.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
8356-8365
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sung, U.,
O'Rear, J. J.,
Yurchenco, P. D.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
123,
1255-1268
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lallier, T.,
Deutzmann, R.,
Perris, R.,
Bronner-Fraser, M.
(1994)
Dev. Biol.
162,
451-464
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pattaramalai, S.,
Skubitz, A. P.
(1994)
Arch. Oral Biol.
39,
925-933
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Calof, A. L.,
Campanero, M. R.,
O'Rear, J. J.,
Yurchenco, P. D.,
Lander, A. D.
(1994)
Neuron
13,
117-130
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Streuli, C. H.,
Schmidhauser, C.,
Bailey, N.,
Yurchenco, P.,
Skubitz, A. P.,
Roskelley, C.,
Bissell, M. J.
(1995)
J. Cell Biol.
129,
591-603
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tashiro, K.,
Sephel, G. C.,
Weeks, B.,
Sasaki, M.,
Martin, G. R.,
Kleinman, H. K.,
Yamada, Y.
(1989)
J. Biol. Chem.
264,
16174-16182
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Grant, D. S.,
Kinsella, J. L.,
Fridman, R.,
Auerbach, R.,
Piasecki, B.
A.,
Yamada, Y.,
Zain, M.,
Kleinman, H. K.
(1992)
J. Cell. Physiol.
153,
614-625
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Thompson, H. L.,
Burbelo, P. D.,
Yamada, Y.,
Kleinman, H. K.,
Metcalfe, D. D.
(1991)
Immunology
72,
144-149
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kanemoto, T.,
Reich, R.,
Royce, L.,
Greatorex, D.,
Adler, S. H.,
Shiraishi, N.,
Martin, G. R.,
Yamada, Y.,
Kleinman, H. K.
(1990)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
87,
2279-2283
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nomizu, M.,
Utani, A.,
Shiraishi, N.,
Kibbey, M. C.,
Yamada, Y.,
Roller, P. P.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
14118-14121
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fessler, J. H.,
Fessler, L. I.
(1989)
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
5,
309-339
[CrossRef]
-
Fessler, J. H.,
Nelson, R. E.,
Fessler, L. I.
(1994)
Methods Cell Biol.
44,
303-328
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fogerty, F. J.,
Fessler, L. I.,
Bunch, T. A.,
Yaron, Y.,
Parker, C. G.,
Nelson, R. E.,
Brower, D. L.,
Gullberg, D.,
Fessler, J. H.
(1994)
Development
120,
1747-1758
[Abstract]
-
Abbott, L. A.,
Natzle, J. E.
(1992)
Mech. Dev.
37,
43-56
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tepass, U.,
Hartenstein, V.
(1994)
Dev. Biol.
161,
563-596
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gullberg, D.,
Fessler, L. I.,
Fessler, J. H.
(1994)
Dev. Dynamics
199,
116-128
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Volk, T.,
Fessler, L. I.,
Fessler, J. H.
(1990)
Cell
63,
525-536
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gotwals, P. J.,
Fessler, L. I.,
Wehrli, M.,
Hynes, R. O.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
11447-11451
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gotwals, P. J.,
Paine-Saunders, S. E.,
Stark, K. A.,
Hynes, R. O.
(1994)
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
6,
734-739
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yarnitzky, T.,
Volk, T.
(1995)
Dev. Biol.
169,
609-618
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Schneuwly, S.,
Klemenz, R.,
Gehring, W. J.
(1987)
Nature
325,
816-818
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Hart, A. C.,
Kramer, H.,
Van Vactor, D. L., Jr.,
Paidhungat, M.,
Zipursky, S. L.
(1990)
Genes Dev.
4,
1835-1847
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schneider, I.
(1972)
J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol.
27,
353-365
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jokerst, R. S.,
Weeks, J. R.,
Zehring, W. A.,
Greenleaf, A. L.
(1989)
Mol. & Gen. Genet.
215,
266-275
-
Krantz, D. E.,
Zipursky, S. L.
(1990)
EMBO J.
9,
1969-1977
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fessler, L. I.,
Nelson, R. E.,
Fessler, J. H.
(1994)
Methods Enzymol.
245,
271-294
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. (1989) Molecular
Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Vol. 1-3, Cold Spring
Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
-
Morris, N. P.,
Keene, D. R.,
Glanville, R. W.,
Bentz, H.,
Burgeson, R. E.
(1986)
J. Biol. Chem.
261,
5638-5644
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Brower, D. L.,
Wilcox, M.,
Piovant, M.,
Smith, R. J.,
Reger, L. A.
(1984)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
81,
7485-7489
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kiehart, D. P.,
Feghali, R.
(1986)
J. Cell Biol.
103,
1517-1525
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jan, L. Y.,
Jan, Y. N.
(1982)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
79,
2700-2704
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fessler, J. H.,
Lunstrum, G.,
Duncan, K. G.,
Campbell, A. G.,
Sterne, R.,
Bachinger, H. P.,
Fessler, L. I.
(1984)
The Role of Extracellular Matrix in Development
(Trelstadt, R.,
eds)
, p. 207, Alan R. Liss Inc., New York
-
Robinow, S.,
White, K.
(1991)
J. Neurobiol.
22,
443-461
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nomizu, M.,
Weeks, B. S.,
Kim, W. H.,
Kleinman, H. K.,
Yamada, Y.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
365,
227-231
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Brancaccio, A.,
Schulthess, T.,
Gesemann, M.,
Engel, J.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
368,
139-142
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Beck, K.,
Dixon, T. W.,
Engel, J.,
Parry, D. A.
(1993)
J. Mol. Biol.
231,
311-323
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Nissinen, M.,
Vuolteenaho, R.,
Boot-Handford, R.,
Kallunki, P.,
Tryggvason, K.
(1991)
Biochem. J.
276,
369-379
-
Sasaki, M.,
Kleinman, H. K.,
Huber, H.,
Deutzmann, R.,
Yamada, Y.
(1988)
J. Biol. Chem.
263,
16536-16544
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vuolteenaho, R.,
Nissinen, M.,
Sainio, K.,
Byers, P.,
Eddy, R.,
Hirvonen, H.,
Shows, T. B.,
Sariola, H.,
Engvall, E.,
Tryggvason, K.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
124,
381-394
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bernier, S. M.,
Utani, A.,
Sugiyama, S.,
Doi, T.,
Polistina, C.,
Yamada, Y.
(1995)
Matrix Biol.
14,
447-455
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Ryan, M. C.,
Tizard, R.,
VanDevanter, D. R.,
Carter, W. G.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
22779-22787
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Iivanainen, A.,
Sainio, K.,
Sariola, H.,
Tryggvason, K.
(1995)
FEBS Lett.
365,
183-188
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Nomizu, Y. Kuratomi, K. M. Malinda, S.-Y. Song, K. Miyoshi, A. Otaka, S. K. Powell, M. P. Hoffman, H. K. Kleinman, and Y. Yamada
Cell Binding Sequences in Mouse Laminin alpha 1 Chain
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 4, 1998;
273(49):
32491 - 32499.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. W. Graner, T. A. Bunch, S. Baumgartner, A. Kerschen, and D. L. Brower
Splice Variants of the Drosophila PS2 Integrins Differentially Interact with RGD-containing Fragments of the Extracellular Proteins Tiggrin, Ten-m, and D-Laminin alpha 2
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 17, 1998;
273(29):
18235 - 18241.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Nomizu, Y. Kuratomi, S.-Y. Song, M. L. Ponce, M. P. Hoffman, S. K. Powell, K. Miyoshi, A. Otaka, H. K. Kleinman, and Y. Yamada
Identification of Cell Binding Sequences in Mouse Laminin gamma 1 Chain by Systematic Peptide Screening
J. Biol. Chem.,
December 19, 1997;
272(51):
32198 - 32205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|