|
Volume 271, Number 31,
Issue of August 2, 1996
pp. 18767-18774
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Specific Interaction between Human Kinetochore Protein CENP-C and
a Nucleolar Transcriptional Regulator*
(Received for publication, November 22, 1995, and in revised form, April 23, 1996)
Ann F.
Pluta
and
William C.
Earnshaw
§
From the Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
CENP-C is a human kinetochore protein that was
originally identified as a chromosomal autoantigen in patients with
scleroderma spectrum disease. To begin to establish a comprehensive
protein map of the human centromere, affinity chromatography was used
to identify nuclear proteins that specifically interact with CENP-C.
Whereas a number of polypeptides appeared to interact with the
full-length CENP-C protein, only a pair of similarly sized proteins of
~100 kDa specifically interacted with the isolated carboxyl-terminal
third of the CENP-C protein. Neither protein of the doublet bound to
control affinity columns. Affinity purification and microsequence
analysis of the proteins in the doublet identified them as the two
highly related nucleolar transcription factors, UBF1 and UBF2 (also
known as the nucleolar autoantigen NOR-90). Immunoblot analysis
confirmed that both proteins also interacted with the full-length
CENP-C polypeptide with similar affinities. Double indirect
immunofluorescence using monospecific antibodies demonstrated that a
subset of CENP-C and UBF/NOR-90 is colocalized at nucleoli of
interphase HeLa cells, suggesting that the in vitro
interaction detected by affinity chromatography may reflect an
interaction that occurs in vivo. We discuss the
implications of these findings in terms of the properties of interphase
centromeres and the role of the nucleolus in scleroderma
autoimmunity.
INTRODUCTION
The genetic material of eukaryotes is packaged into chromosomes
through its interactions with both histones and non-histone chromosomal
proteins. Each of the histones is present in vast quantities in the
cell and, as a component of nucleosomes, is responsible for the most
basic level of chromatin organization. In contrast, individual
non-histone chromosomal proteins are considerably less abundant and
have more specialized roles, including the structural and functional
organization of specific chromosomal elements. One such element is the
centromere, the chromosomal region responsible for the precise and
accurate segregation of the genetic material during mitosis and
meiosis. The centromere directs the segregation of mitotic chromosomes
through a differentiated trilaminar structure called the kinetochore,
which serves as the binding site for spindle microtubules and for the
mechanochemical motors that move chromosomes along those microtubules.
The centromere also regulates the separation of sister chromatids at
the metaphase-anaphase transition.
A complete understanding of how the centromere coordinates these
important functions requires comprehensive knowledge of the proteins
involved. The identification of the protein components of the human
centromere initially seemed a daunting task until it was discovered
that patients with scleroderma spectrum disease produce circulating
autoantibodies that recognize several centromeric polypeptides (1, 2).
cDNAs encoding three ntromere roteins,
CENP-A, -B, and -C, have now been cloned, and the proteins have been
studied in detail. CENP-A is a novel centromere-specific core histone
related to histone H3 (3). CENP-B is an -satellite DNA-binding
protein that is localized throughout the centromeric heterochromatin
located beneath the kinetochore (4, 5, 6). CENP-C is also a DNA-binding
protein and is located at the interface between the centromeric
heterochromatin and the innermost region of the kinetochore (7).
Despite these advances, several obstacles have hindered the
identification of other proteins that compose the human centromere and
kinetochore. First, centromere proteins are very minor constituents in
the cell. For example, it has been estimated that CENP-B is present in
20,000-50,000 copies/cell (8, 9). Second, like many structural
proteins, centromere proteins are relatively insoluble, a property that
complicates their isolation and characterization. Finally, there are no
good functional assays available to screen for mammalian centromere
proteins, nor are there any widely applicable methods for directly
purifying these chromosomal structures.
Despite these difficulties, two different approaches have identified a
handful of new centromere proteins. One of these involves the
visual/empirical survey of known proteins suspected of being involved
in centromere function using monospecific antibody probes and
immunoelectron microscopy of mitotic cells (10, 11). In the other
approach, centromere proteins are identified by generating monoclonal
antibody probes to chromosomal protein fractions enriched in known
centromeric autoantigens. This type of experiment has now been done
using human, chicken, and Xenopus cells as starting material
and has resulted in the identification of CENP-E, a kinesin-related
microtubule-binding protein (12, 13); the INCENP proteins
( ner tromere roteins),
chromosomal passenger proteins (14, 15); and the 3F3/2
kinetochore-localized phosphoepitopes that may be involved in cell
cycle signaling (16, 17). In addition, routine screening of patient
autoimmune sera continues to occasionally yield a novel
centromere-associated autoantigen (e.g. CENP-F) (18, 19).
These approaches are unlikely to have identified all (or even a
majority) of the protein components of the human centromere and
kinetochore. Furthermore, none of these approaches begins to
characterize the protein-protein interactions that functionally and
structurally define the centromere and kinetochore.
Mounting evidence suggests that the 140-kDa human centromeric
autoantigen, CENP-C, plays a pivotal role in centromere structure and
function. First, the demonstration that CENP-C is found only at the
active centromere of a stable dicentric chromosome, while CENP-B is
found at both the active and inactive centromeres, suggests a direct
role for CENP-C in centromere function (20). Second, CENP-C has been
immunolocalized to the inner plate of the kinetochore, a structure
intimately involved in the attachment of chromosomes to the mitotic
spindle (7). Third, evidence from antibody microinjection experiments
indicates that CENP-C is involved in the assembly of a structurally
sound, morphologically normal kinetochore and is required for the
cell's timely transition into anaphase (21).
We have developed a biochemical approach to identify chromosomal
proteins involved in centromere function. By exploiting CENP-C as an
affinity handle to dissect protein interactions at the centromere, we
have identified a specific interaction with two protein components of
the nucleolus. Our results are consistent with known properties of
interphase centromeres and the observed involvement of the nucleolus in
the autoimmune response in scleroderma spectrum disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Expression and Purification of CENP-C and Control
Baits
CENP-C-containing affinity baits expressed in bacteria as
GST1 fusion proteins using pGEX2T
(Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) were derived from pTCATG, an expression
plasmid containing the entire CENP-C coding region. pTCATG was
constructed by ligating the NdeI (site underlined)- and
SphI-digested polymerase chain reaction product resulting
from amplification of CNPC7 (7) with oligonucleotide primers CENPCATG
(5 -CCGATA GCTGCGTCCGGTCTGG-AT-3 ) and CENPC2
(5 -GGTATTGTAATCCAAGATCTACTGGC-3 ) to NdeI- and
SphI-digested pTCNPC (7). The full-length CENP-C open
reading frame was isolated from pTCATG by digestion with
NdeI followed by treatment with T4 DNA polymerase and
EcoRI digestion and cloned into BamHI-digested
and T4 DNA polymerase-treated pGEX2T, which was also digested with
EcoRI. The correct reading frame of the resulting construct,
pGEX2T/C1-943 (in which the numbers refer to the amino acid residues
of CENP-C), was confirmed by DNA sequence analysis.
pGEX2T/C1-943 was digested with BglII and EcoRI,
and the resulting 5.9-kilobase fragment containing the entire pGEX2T
sequence and the amino-terminal third of the CENP-C open reading frame
was gel-isolated, treated with T4 DNA polymerase, and self-ligated to
create pGEX2T/C1-315. The 1074-base pair
BglII-EcoRI fragment resulting from this same
digestion was cloned into BamHI- and
EcoRI-digested pGEX2T to create pGEX2T/C635-943.
Oligonucleotide primers CENPC8
(5 -CAGT TGGATTACAATA-C-3 ) and CENPC9
(5 -CTTGT AGAACAATCAAG-3 ) were used to polymerase
chain reaction-amplify the middle third of the CENP-C open reading
frame from pTCATG. The resulting fragment was gel-isolated, digested
with BamHI (sites underlined), and cloned into
BamHI-digested and alkaline phosphatase-treated pGEX2T to
create pGEX2T/C315-635.
Constructs encoding GST-CENP-C fusion proteins were transformed into
DH5 or CAG456 (pGEX2T/C1-943). Fusion protein expression was
induced at A600 = 0.4 with 0.1 mM
isopropyl-1-thio- -D-galactopyranoside for 4 h at
37 °C (GST-C1-315 and GST-C635-943) or at 30 °C (GST-C1-943
and GST-C315-635). Fusion proteins containing the middle or amino- or
carboxyl-terminal third of CENP-C were affinity-purified on
glutathione-agarose (Sigma) from bacterial lysates
made by sonication at 0 °C in XB buffer (20 mM
NaPO4, pH 7.5, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
EGTA, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40) containing 0.2 mg/ml lysozyme, protease
inhibitors, and either 150 mM NaCl (GST-C635-943) or 300 mM NaCl (GST-C1-315 and GST-C315-635).
GST-C1-943 failed to bind glutathione-agarose and was therefore
partially purified from induced bacteria as follows. Cells were lysed
by sonication at 0 °C in Solution I (10 mM
NaPO4, pH 7.0, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM
EGTA, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40) containing 25 mM NaCl, 0.2 mg/ml lysozyme, and protease inhibitors. The supernatant resulting from
centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 20 min was brought to
33% ammonium sulfate, rotated for several hours at 4 °C, and then
centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min. The pellet was
resuspended in Solution I and dialyzed extensively against the same
buffer lacking detergent and then centrifuged at 12,000 × g for 10 min. The resulting supernatant was adjusted to 10 mM MgCl2, incubated on ice for 45 min, and then
centrifuged at 3000 × g for 10 min. The resulting
pellet was resuspended in Solution I containing 400 mM
NaCl, 10 mM dithiothreitol, and protease inhibitors and
centrifuged for 10 min at 120 × g. The resulting
supernatant was enriched for GST-C1-943. Control baits were purchased
from Sigma (lysozyme) or affinity-purified as
described above from induced bacteria transformed with pGEX2T
(GST).
Preparation of Protein Affinity Columns
Purified baits were
coupled with Affi-Gel 10 (Bio-Rad) essentially as described (22) at a
concentration of 1-2 mg of protein/ml of Affi-Gel. Columns containing
2-4 ml of coupled Affi-Gel were constructed in plastic disposable
syringes.
Nuclear Extracts
HeLa nuclei were typically isolated from
20 liters of cells grown to a density of 5-8 × 105
cells/ml in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium/Ham's F-12 medium
(1:1 mixture) with 2% calf serum and antibiotics. Cells were
resuspended in 50-100 mM PIPES, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgSO4, 1 mM dithiothreitol, and
protease inhibitors and then lysed by sonication on ice. Lysates were
centrifuged at 2800 × g in a Sorvall SS34 rotor for 10 min. The resulting nuclear pellets were resuspended in the same buffer
and quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen. For extract preparation, frozen
nuclei were thawed quickly in a room temperature water bath, and their
volume was estimated. 0.5 volume of cold H2O containing
protease inhibitors, 5 mg/ml RNase A, and 2 mg/ml nuclease
P1 (Pharmacia Biotech Inc.) was added, and the mixture was
incubated on ice for 30 min. Digested nuclei were homogenized by
douncing on ice and then aliquotted to 40-ml Sorvall tubes. To each
tube (containing 10 ml of nuclei) were added 10 ml of cold 1 × TEE (10 mM triethanolamine HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH
9.0) and 20 ml of cold 2 × lysis buffer (20 mM Tris,
pH 9.1, 20 mM EDTA, 20 mM EGTA, 4 M
NaCl, 0.2% Ammonyx Lo, and 60 mM 2-mercaptoethanol), both
containing protease inhibitors. The contents of each tube were then
homogenized by douncing on ice followed by sonication to decrease the
viscosity of the mixture and then centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 30 min. Supernatants were pooled, adjusted to 10-15%
glycerol and 1 mg/ml polyethylene glycol 8000, and dialyzed against
several changes of RB buffer (10 mM Tris, pH 9.1, 10 mM EDTA, 10 mM EGTA, 150 mM NaCl,
10% glycerol, 0.2% Ammonyx Lo, 2 mg/ml polyethylene glycol 8000, and
30 mM 2-mercaptoethanol) at 4 °C. Dialyzed extracts were
centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 30 min, and the
supernatants were pooled and used for affinity chromatography.
Chromatography and Gels
Affinity columns coupled with
protein baits were equilibrated with at least 20 volumes of RB buffer
at 4 °C and then loaded with nuclear extract, which was recirculated
over experimental and control columns overnight in parallel. The
following day, columns were washed with at least 20 volumes of RB
buffer, and specifically bound proteins were eluted with RB buffer
containing a 150 mM to 1 M NaCl gradient.
Gradient fractions containing eluted proteins were trichloroacetic
acid-precipitated in the presence of tRNA, resolved on 5-15%
SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels, and visualized by silver staining
(Bio-Rad).
Affinity Purification of Doublet and Internal Peptide
Microsequence Analysis
The ~100-kDa doublet was
affinity-purified from HeLa nuclear extract (~150 liters of cells) on
three different GST-C635-943 affinity columns. Fractions containing
the doublet, determined by silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gels, were
pooled, concentrated by dialysis against Aquacide (Calbiochem), and
then precipitated with 20% trichloroacetic acid. The resulting pellet
was washed with 90% acetone and 10% HCl, resuspended in SDS sample
buffer, resolved on a 6.5% SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad). Bands corresponding to
each protein of the doublet were visualized by staining the membrane
with 0.2% Ponceau S in 1% acetic acid and excised from the membrane.
Internal microsequence analysis was performed at the Harvard
Microchemistry Facility.
Immunoblotting and Immunofluorescence
Electrophoresis and
immunoblotting were performed as described previously (23).
Immunodetections using ECL (Amersham Corp.) and horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-human and anti-rabbit IgG (Amersham Corp.)
were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Indirect
immunofluorescence was performed essentially as described (24). Images
were obtained using a DAGE SIT camera with a Perceptics PixelPipeline
board driven by a modified version of Adobe
Photoshop.2 Human autoimmune S14 serum (25)
was obtained from D. Hernandez-Verdun; affinity-purified rabbit
polyclonal anti-UBF was obtained from H. Beckmann and R. Tjian.
Polyclonal anti-CENP-C antibody (anti-g296-943) was as described
(7).
RESULTS
Preparation of CENP-C Affinity Columns and Nuclear
Extracts
The purpose of this study was to begin to develop a
structural map of the human kinetochore, starting with CENP-C, a well
characterized component of the inner kinetochore plate. CENP-C is a
particularly suitable subject for such studies as it has been
previously shown that this protein is important for determining the
overall diameter of the human kinetochore plates (21). Four methods
have recently come into wide use for the identification of ligands that
interact with a protein of interest. 1) Genetics provides a powerful
means of detecting interactions between gene products in certain
organisms, especially those where the ability to manipulate
chromosomal DNA sequences has been developed. 2) The yeast two-hybrid
interaction trap provides a way of detecting protein domains that
interact with sufficient affinity to generate a transcriptional
activator whose activity can be monitored by the expression of reporter
constructs (26, 27). 3) Co-immunoprecipitation is frequently used to
detect associations between various soluble proteins. 4) Finally,
affinity chromatography, the least widely used of these methods,
provides a way of detecting interacting components and assessing their
relative affinities for one another (28).
In the case of CENP-C, the repertoire of methods that can be used to
search for interacting proteins is limited. CENP-C has yet to be
detected in any genetically tractable organism outside of mammals.
Likewise, co-immunoprecipitation is excluded by the fact that CENP-C is
a structural protein that is soluble only under denaturing conditions
that disrupt most biologically relevant protein-protein
interactions.3 Thus, the yeast interaction
trap4 and affinity chromatography, which
forms the subject of this report, are left as the two viable methods to
search for proteins that interact with CENP-C.
Affinity chromatography requires the purification of significant
quantities of the protein that is to be used as the ``bait'' and the
development of an appropriate extract of soluble cellular proteins,
which is the source of potential interacting proteins or ligands (22).
Both of these requirements presented unique challenges for the
identification of proteins that interact with CENP-C because of the
nature of human centromere proteins. Human centromere proteins (and,
presumably, the proteins with which they interact) are not only
exceedingly minor components in the cell, but are also associated with
the chromosome scaffold fraction (23). Chromosome scaffold proteins are
distinguished from other chromosomal proteins by their unusual degree
of insolubility. Solubilization of these proteins typically requires
not only conditions designed to disrupt protein-protein interactions,
such as high salt or low salt in the presence of polyanions, but also
requires the addition of substantial levels of a reducing agent, such
as -mercaptoethanol (29, 30).
This combination of low abundance and insolubility precluded the
purification of endogenous CENP-C from human cells for use as an
affinity bait. Therefore, to obtain the milligram quantities of CENP-C
necessary to make useful affinity columns, full-length CENP-C and
several portions of the CENP-C polypeptide were affinity-purified as
GST fusion proteins from induced bacterial cells that had been
transformed with the appropriate pGEX/CENP-C construct. Fig.
1 diagrams the CENP-C-derived GST fusion proteins used
as baits in our experiments and lists their predicted properties. The
hydropathy plot shown in Fig. 1A predicts that GST-CENP-C is
a hydrophilic and highly basic (pI 9.2) protein. Two control baits were
also included in all affinity chromatography experiments. One of these,
lysozyme (pI ~10), was included as a control for nonspecific binding
of acidic ligands to the three basic CENP-C-derived baits. The second
control bait consisted of GST alone since this bacterial peptide was
fused to all CENP-C-derived constructs. In Fig. 1C, the
expressed CENP-C baits are displayed on Coomassie Blue-stained
polyacrylamide gels. All partial CENP-C baits were affinity-purified on
GST-agarose. GST-C1-943, which contains the full-length CENP-C open
reading frame, failed to bind GST-agarose and was instead partially
purified from induced bacterial extracts by standard biochemical
fractionation (see ``Materials and Methods'').
Fig. 1.
GST-CENP-C baits used for affinity
chromatography. A, hydropathy plot of the full-length
CENP-C-containing GST fusion protein at the amino terminus. Line
drawings beneath indicate the four GST-CENP-C fusion proteins used as
experimental baits. The open boxes represent the ~26-kDa
GST moiety, while the black boxes represent the portion of
CENP-C contained in the fusion protein. The numbers in the construct
name indicate the amino acid residues of CENP-C included in each
protein. B, predicted and observed properties of the
experimental baits. a Two control baits were run in parallel
with each experimental bait. GST, a 26-kDa protein with a estimated pI
of 6.0, was used to control for the fusion moiety present at the amino
terminus of each experimental bait. Lysozyme, a 14-kDa protein with a
pI of 10-11, was included as a control for the basic experimental
baits. b Values are the relative molecular mass (in
kilodaltons) calculated from the amino acid sequence. c Values
are the apparent molecular mass (in kilodaltons) determined from
mobility on SDS-polyacrylamide gels. d Values are the
isoelectric point of fusion proteins calculated from the amino acid
sequence. e Both bands reacted with a human autoimmune serum
containing antibodies to CENP-C. C, Coomassie Blue-stained
lanes of purified experimental GST-CENP-C baits. Lane 1,
GST-C315-635; lane 2, GST-C635-943; lane 3,
GST-C1-943; lane 4, GST-C1-315. Arrows indicate
the band in each lane that corresponds to the full-length fusion
protein expressed by each construct. The asterisk indicates
the GST fusion moiety that was proteolytically cleaved during protein
purification. Molecular mass standards (in kilodaltons) are
indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (41K GIF file)]
The development of a suitable extract to be used as the source of
putative interacting proteins was also dictated by the known properties
of human centromere proteins described above. A protein extract derived
from purified human mitotic chromosomes would, in theory, be the ideal
source for identifying proteins that interact with a component of the
inner kinetochore plate. In practice, however, the vast amounts of
purified chromosomes required as starting material if sufficient
amounts of interacting proteins are to be recovered for subsequent
analysis and identification make this impractical. The compromise was
to develop a protein extract from crude preparations of interphase
nuclei obtained from HeLa cells grown in large chemostat cultures.
Interphase nuclei are a reasonable source of proteins that interact
with centromere proteins because several of the CENP proteins,
including CENP-C, are constitutive components of interphase centromeres
(2, 20, 31). While it is certainly possible that some interactions that
require mitosis-specific post-translational protein modifications would
not be detected using a nuclear extract as a source of interacting
proteins, it is also possible that previously unsuspected interactions
that are specific to interphase centromeres could be identified by
using such an extract.
Among the requirements for a successful affinity chromatography
experiment is that the putative interacting ligands exist as soluble
proteins in the extract. In practice, this requirement proved difficult
to satisfy. To produce a nuclear extract containing soluble proteins,
the putative (unknown) interactors were assumed to behave biochemically
like known centromere proteins, which can be monitored by
immunoblotting. If an initial high salt nuclear lysate was made by
solubilizing isolated nuclei in a buffer containing 2 M
NaCl and 30 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Fig. 2),
the majority of nuclear proteins detected by Coomassie Blue staining,
including CENP-A, -B, and -C, which were detected by immunoblotting,
were recovered in the supernatant or soluble fraction. Such a high salt
lysate cannot, however, be used to detect ionic interactions by
affinity chromatography. It was therefore necessary to reduce the ionic
strength of the solubilized nuclear ligands prior to their passage over
the affinity columns by either dialysis or dilution. Initially, either
step resulted in the abrupt precipitation of the bulk of the
chromosomal proteins including all of the CENP antigens. Eventually,
buffer conditions were established that permitted the reduction of the
salt concentration of the nuclear lysate to near physiological levels
(150 mM) while maintaining the solubility of the majority
of total protein as well as significant amounts of centromere proteins
detectable by immunoblotting (Fig. 2). This soluble low salt extract
was used as the source of interacting proteins in subsequent affinity
chromatography experiments.
Fig. 2.
Development of nuclear extracts containing
soluble centromere proteins. Isolated HeLa nuclei were solubilized
in the presence of 2 M NaCl and 30 mM
-mercaptoethanol and separated into insoluble (lanes P1)
and soluble (lanes S1) fractions. The high salt supernatant
(S1) was slowly dialyzed to reduce the ionic strength and
then separated into low salt insoluble (lanes P2) and
soluble (lanes S2) fractions. Pellet and supernatant
fractions were analyzed on sister SDS-polyacrylamide gels by Coomassie
Blue staining (left panel) to detect total protein and by
immunoblotting (right panel) with a human autoimmune serum
that recognizes human centromere proteins CENP-A, -B, and -C
(arrows). Molecular mass standards (in kilodaltons) are
indicated.
[View Larger Version of this Image (95K GIF file)]
CENP-C Affinity Chromatography
In a typical affinity
chromatography experiment, a low salt nuclear extract derived from
~2 × 1010 HeLa cells was pumped simultaneously over
four affinity columns, which were set up in parallel, and recirculated
overnight at 4 °C. Two of these affinity columns were coupled with
the control baits, GST and lysozyme. The remaining two affinity columns
were each coupled with a different experimental bait consisting of a
CENP-C-derived GST fusion protein. Following extensive washing of the
affinity columns with running buffer containing 150 mM NaCl
to remove nonspecifically associated nuclear proteins, specifically
bound proteins were eluted from each column with a linear salt gradient
and visualized on silver-stained polyacrylamide gels.
The protein elution profiles from a typical experiment in which the two
experimental columns were coupled with GST-C1-943 and GST-C635-943
are shown in Fig. 3. It is immediately obvious that
while very few proteins could be eluted from either control column
(panels A and B), a unique spectrum of proteins
could be eluted from each of the experimental columns (panels
C and D). This ranged from no proteins specifically
eluted from the column baited with the amino-terminal 315 amino acids
of CENP-C (data not shown), to a complex mixture of proteins that was
eluted from the column baited with full-length CENP-C (panel
C). That the binding of this complex mixture was specific is
suggested by the observation that each ionic strength appeared to elute
a specific subset of proteins. The most striking results were obtained
with columns baited with the carboxyl-terminal 308 amino acids of
CENP-C (panel D). Only three proteins were eluted from this
column as detected on a silver-stained gel. Two of these proteins
composed a doublet with a relative molecular mass of ~100 kDa, which
coeluted from the column at 400-600 mM NaCl. This
coelution property suggested either that the two proteins were closely
related to each other and thus interacted in similar ways with the bait
or that they were in a complex with each other. (The third protein of
~60 kDa indicated by the open arrow in panel D
was found by immunoblot analysis to be incompletely coupled bait, which
eluted from the column at higher salt concentrations (data not shown).)
Neither band of the ~100-kDa doublet was observed to elute from
either control column, confirming that the binding of these proteins to
the column was due to specific interactions with the CENP-C-derived
portion of the GST-C635-943 fusion protein. In similar experiments in
which the middle third of CENP-C was used as bait, several low
molecular mass proteins specifically eluted from this
column.3 These proteins were not studied further.
Fig. 3.
Affinity chromatography using full-length and
carboxyl-terminal CENP-C fusion protein baits. Specifically bound
proteins eluted with a 0.15-1.0 M NaCl gradient from four
affinity columns loaded in parallel with the same low salt nuclear
extract were trichloroacetic acid-precipitated using tRNA as carrier
and displayed on silver-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gels. The
bait protein used to affinity purify the eluted proteins is indicated
in the upper right-hand corner of each gel. A and
B show the profile of proteins eluted from the columns
coupled with the control baits GST and lysozyme, respectively.
C and D show proteins eluted from the columns
coupled with the CENP-C-derived baits GST-C1-943 and GST-C635-943,
respectively. Equivalent volumes of consecutive protein fractions were
loaded on each gel, with increasing ionic strength of elution
proceeding from the left-most fraction to the right-most for each gel.
Arrowheads in D indicate the ~100-kDa protein
doublet, which was isolated for further study; the open
arrow indicates incompletely coupled bait, which eluted from this
column at higher salt concentrations. Lanes M, molecular
mass markers.
[View Larger Version of this Image (114K GIF file)]
The complex mixture of proteins eluted from the affinity column coupled
with full-length CENP-C was unexpected and will clearly require a
secondary screen in order to identify those ligands worthy of further
characterization. As such a screen, we have raised monoclonal
antibodies against the pools of proteins that eluted from this column
at low, medium, and high salt. The results of this screen will be
presented elsewhere.
Specific Association of UBF1/NOR-90 with the Carboxyl Terminus of
CENP-C in Vitro
Because only two proteins eluted from the
affinity column baited with the carboxyl-terminal third of CENP-C, we
decided to focus our initial efforts on the further characterization of
this fraction. The fact that these proteins eluted from the column at a
moderately elevated ionic strength (~500 mM NaCl)
suggests that their interactions with CENP-C are of reasonably high
affinity, thus making them good candidates for further analysis.
Therefore, the two proteins composing the ~100-kDa doublet were
affinity-purified from nuclear extracts derived from ~150 liters of
HeLa cells, resolved on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and transferred to
polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. The Ponceau S-stained band
corresponding to each protein of the doublet was excised from the
membrane and processed for microsequence analysis. Amino acid analysis
indicated that 10-15 pmol of each protein had been affinity-purified.
Following enzymatic digestion and peptide separation by high
performance liquid chromatography, the lower band of the doublet
yielded sequenceable amounts of three peptides. Two of those peptides
gave sequences 17 and 8 amino acids in length (Fig. 4).
A computer homology search of the protein data base with the 17-amino
acid peptide sequence indicated a 100% match with two human proteins,
UBF1 ( pstream inding
actor 1), a ribosomal RNA (nucleolar) transcription
factor, and an alternatively spliced form of UBF1 that has a 37-amino
acid deletion (residues 221-257) (32). This variant of UBF1, also
called NOR-90 ( ucleolus rganizer
egion), was independently identified as a nucleolar
autoantigen in scleroderma (33, 34). A visual search of the UBF1
peptide sequence then located a region that matched the partially
determined 8-amino acid peptide perfectly (residues 628-635 of UBF1)
(Fig. 4). The relative molecular masses of UBF1 and NOR-90, which are
97 and 94 kDa, respectively, are consistent with the observed molecular
mass (~100 kDa) of the affinity-purified doublet. Thus, the protein
doublet detected by GST-C635-943 affinity chromatography was
tentatively identified as the two closely related proteins, UBF1 and
NOR-90. This identification was subsequently confirmed by immunoblot
analysis using S14, a well characterized human autoimmune serum
specific for UBF/NOR-90 (25). In Fig. 5A, the
affinity-purified doublet, which was visualized by silver staining in
the left panel, reacted with the autoimmune serum
(right panel) and produced a signal that comigrated with
endogenous UBF/NOR-90 from isolated HeLa nuclei.
Fig. 4.
Peptides isolated from the affinity-purified
doublet are homologous to UBF1 and NOR-90, two related nucleolar
transcription factors. In this schematic representation, the
hatched boxes indicate the positions of the high mobility
group box motifs, while the black boxes indicate two highly
acidic regions in the carboxyl termini (42). UBF1 and NOR-90 are
identical except for a 37-amino acid (aa) deletion in NOR-90
that eliminates the second high mobility group box. The sequences and
relative positions of the two peptides isolated from the
affinity-purified doublet are shown; numbers in
parentheses refer to amino acid residues of UBF1.
[View Larger Version of this Image (14K GIF file)]
Fig. 5.
The UBF/NOR-90 doublet elutes from affinity
columns coupled with the carboxyl terminus of CENP-C and with
full-length CENP-C. A, the ~100-kDa doublet was
affinity-purified from a column coupled with the GST-C635-943 bait,
separated on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel, and visualized by silver stain
(lane 1) or detected by immunoblotting with human S14 serum
(lane 2). Lanes 3 and 4 contain crude
nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts, respectively, isolated from
~105 HeLa cells. B, the UBF/NOR-90 doublet
bound GST-C1-943 and eluted at an ionic strength similar to that at
which these proteins eluted from the column coupled with GST-C635-943.
Odd-numbered fractions from the same samples displayed in
Fig. 3C were separated on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel,
transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with an affinity-purified
polyclonal antibody to UBF. Lane U contains in
vitro translated UBF protein. Lanes N and C
contain crude nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts, respectively, from
~106 HeLa cells. Lane M contains molecular
mass markers (in kilodaltons). C, a minor fraction of total
UBF/NOR-90 bound to a GST-C635-943 affinity column. Equivalent protein
loads (100 µg) of HeLa nuclear extract prior to (lane 1)
or following (lane 2) affinity chromatography with the
GST/C635-943 bait were separated on an SDS-polyacrylamide gel,
transferred to nitrocellulose, and probed with an affinity-purified
polyclonal antibody to UBF.
[View Larger Version of this Image (45K GIF file)]
Because the bait used for the original identification of the ~100-kDa
doublet was a partial CENP-C molecule, an important control was to
determine whether UBF/NOR-90 bound with similar affinity to a column
coupled with the full-length CENP-C polypeptide. Accordingly,
immunoblot analysis of protein fractions eluted from the GST-C1-943
affinity column was performed using a polyclonal antibody specific for
UBF/NOR-90. The characteristic doublet signal was observed for
fractions eluting at an ionic strength similar to that observed for the
elution of UBF/NOR-90 from the GST-C635-943 affinity column (Fig.
5B). Therefore, we conclude that the interaction of
UBF/NOR-90 with the full-length CENP-C protein is mediated by amino
acid residues residing in the carboxyl-terminal third of CENP-C.
A Subset of CENP-C and UBF/NOR-90 Is Colocalized in HeLa
Cells
As a first step to confirm that the interaction between
CENP-C and UBF/NOR-90 detected in vitro can occur in
vivo, we examined the distribution of CENP-C and UBF/NOR-90 in
cultured human cells. We used double-label indirect immunofluorescence
to simultaneously localize CENP-C and UBF/NOR-90 in formaldehyde-fixed
HeLa cells (Fig. 6). UBF/NOR-90 was detected with human
autoimmune S14 serum. CENP-C was detected with a monospecific
polyclonal antibody (7). In mitotic cells (panels C and
D), UBF/NOR-90 was concentrated at the chromosomal NOR
regions of five pairs of acrocentric chromosomes, which placed these
proteins in a position near to, but distinct from, mitotic centromeres
detected with the CENP-C antibody. In interphase cells (panels
A and B), S14 gave a punctate staining pattern that was
confined to interphase nucleoli as previously documented for this serum
(25). In the same cells, the CENP-C antibody gave a typical staining
pattern for interphase centromeres: punctate nuclear spots, a number of
which closely encircle nucleoli and colocalize with UBF. The limited
colocalization we observed between CENP-C and UBF/NOR-90 in interphase
nuclei is consistent with immunoblot data demonstrating that the amount
of UBF/NOR-90 detectable in the post-affinity column nuclear extract is
indistinguishable from that detectable in the pre-affinity column
nuclear extract (Fig. 5C). These results bolster the
conclusion that a subfraction of CENP-C may interact with UBF/NOR-90 in
the interphase nucleus.
Fig. 6.
CENP-C and UBF display limited colocalization
in interphase HeLa cells. Interphase (A and
B) and mitotic (C and D) HeLa cells
were processed for double-label indirect immunofluorescence to localize
CENP-C (pink) and UBF/NOR-90 (green). DNA, which
was stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, is shown in
blue. Arrows indicate regions of close
association between CENP-C and UBF/NOR-90 in nuclei.
[View Larger Version of this Image (131K GIF file)]
We have attempted to address the nature of the interaction between
CENP-C and UBF/NOR-90 further by performing direct in vitro
protein-protein interaction studies using purified bacterially
expressed GST-C635-943 and UBF protein produced by in vitro
transcription/translation. While every effort was made to reproduce the
conditions used in our original affinity chromatography experiments in
which the interaction between CENP-C and UBF/NOR-90 was initially
identified, we have been unable to demonstrate an interaction between
these two proteins (data not shown). Other efforts to confirm the
interaction between CENP-C and UBF/NOR-90 in vivo have to
date proven to be technically unfeasible. Co-immunoprecipitation
experiments were not practical as we have only been able to
immunoprecipitate CENP-C following denaturation in SDS, which
efficiently disrupts most protein-protein interactions. The yeast
two-hybrid interaction trap screen was also not feasible as we were
unable (despite repeated efforts) to clone the UBF1 cDNA into the
interaction trap prey vector pJG4-5 (26) in the correct
orientation.
DISCUSSION
We developed a biochemical approach to identify proteins that
interact with the human kinetochore protein CENP-C and have found that
two related nucleolar proteins specifically bind affinity columns
coupled with CENP-C via residues at its carboxyl terminus. Several
facts suggest that the interaction we have detected between CENP-C and
UBF/NOR-90 by protein affinity chromatography is significant. First,
the interaction of UBF/NOR-90 with the CENP-C carboxyl terminus was
highly reproducible and allowed the affinity purification of sufficient
quantities of the proteins from nuclear extracts for direct
microsequence analysis. Second, we have demonstrated that CENP-C and
UBF show limited colocalization in interphase nuclei. Finally, it has
recently been shown that transient expression of CENP-C amino acid
residues 638-829 (which do not contain the centromere targeting
signal) in HeLa cells results in a protein that specifically
accumulates in nucleoli (35). Thus, the potential for the
carboxyl-terminal region of CENP-C to interact with nucleoli in
vivo appears to be regulated in the context of the whole
protein.
Both CENP-C and UBF have previously been functionally characterized.
CENP-C is a basic protein capable of binding DNA in vitro
(7). The DNA-binding domain of CENP-C has been localized to a short
region (~116 amino acid) located in the center of the protein
(residues 422-537) (35). It is not yet known whether CENP-C binds a
specific DNA sequence. The DNA-binding region overlaps with a domain
(residues 478-537) that is necessary and sufficient to target CENP-C
to centromeres in transfected HeLa cells (35). No function has yet been
identified for the carboxyl-terminal third of CENP-C (residues
635-943), which we have shown here to interact with UBF/NOR-90.
However, several observations suggest that the carboxyl terminus of
CENP-C is functionally important. First, the carboxyl terminus of
CENP-C is the most highly conserved region of the protein between
humans and mice (36). Second, this part of CENP-C shares two regions of
amino acid similarity (40% identity over 27 amino acids and 28%
identity over 52 amino acids) with an essential budding yeast protein,
Mif2p (36, 37). Properties of MIF2 mutants are consistent
with Mif2p being a centromere protein (36). Interestingly, two mutant
alleles of MIF2 that display defects in chromosome
segregation and genetically interact with mutants in other yeast
centromere proteins have base pair changes that lead to amino acid
substitutions in the region of high CENP-C homology. Thus, if this
region of CENP-C/MIF2 is functionally conserved, one of
those functions may involve interactions with other proteins, including
UBF/NOR-90. In this regard, it is noteworthy that one of the centromere
proteins with which mutant Mif2p interacts genetically is Cpf1p (36),
which, in addition to binding the centromere DNA element CDEI, acts
(like UBF/NOR-90) as a transcription factor at other loci in the yeast
genome (38, 39, 40).
UBF1 is a highly charged protein that binds DNA sequences in the
ribosomal RNA promoter via four high mobility group box motifs and
activates transcription by interacting with other factors, including
SL1 and RNA polymerase I (32, 41). UBF1 contains a dimerization domain
at its amino terminus and an acidic carboxyl-terminal tail composed of
two uninterrupted tracts of glutamic and aspartic acid residues that
are 21 and 18 amino acids long (42). At present, we do not know whether
UBF/NOR-90 interacts with CENP-C directly or indirectly. Our inability
to demonstrate a direct interaction using partially purified
GST-C635-943 and UBF may reflect, in part, our lack of success in
accurately replicating the conditions that permitted binding in the
affinity chromatography experiments. For example, unknown
post-translational modifications of UBF, not present on in
vitro translated UBF, may be required for interactions with
CENP-B. Additionally, while the functional significance of the
naturally occurring deletion variant NOR-90 is not clear, it, as well
as UBF, may be important for CENP-C interactions. Alternatively, these
results may suggest that CENP-C and UBF/NOR-90 do not interact
directly, but rather require an additional protein(s) not detectable on
our silver-stained gels. If the interaction of UBF/NOR-90 with CENP-C
is direct, we suspect that binding is unlikely to involve nonspecific
interactions with the UBF1 acidic tail. Nuclei contain many
polypeptides with acidic regions that rival or exceed that of
UBF/NOR-90 (43). However, only the UBF/NOR-90 doublet was observed to
bind to the affinity column baited with the carboxyl-terminal third of
CENP-C. Furthermore, we have failed to detect any interaction between
CENP-C and the acidic centromere protein CENP-B (5) either by affinity
chromatography or in the yeast two-hybrid interaction
assay.3
CENP-C is not the first centromere protein that has been found to
interact with a non-centromere protein. The centromere-associated human
autoantigen CENP-F was also cloned under another name (mitosin) based
on its ability to bind a portion of the retinoblastoma protein in
vitro (44). The biological significance of this interaction
remains unclear, and the function of CENP-F is unknown. In addition to
CENP-F, the retinoblastoma protein has also been found to interact with
UBF (45, 46), providing an indirect link between a centromere protein
and a nucleolar transcription factor. Here we demonstrate a direct
biochemical link between CENP-C and UBF.
Another intriguing recent result also strengthens the link between
centromeres and nucleoli. A novel nucleolar protein from rat liver
called NAP57 was found to co-immunoprecipitate with Nopp140, a
shuttling nucleolar phosphoprotein (47). NAP57 shows striking
similarity (71% identity and 85% homology) over ~82% of its length
to the product of the essential budding yeast gene CBF5.
Cbf5p is a low affinity centromere-binding protein that interacts
genetically with CBF3, a multiprotein, high affinity centromere-binding
complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (48). Interestingly,
Cbf5p is reported to localize to the nucleolus in yeast (47). It has
been proposed that NAP57 and its highly conserved homologs may serve as
chaperones for newly made ribosomal components (47).
Compelling evidence for an intimate relationship between interphase
centromeres and nucleoli comes from studies using isolated human
nucleoli (49). Immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy using
anti-centromere antibodies from scleroderma patients unambiguously
placed centromeric autoantigens within the chromatin surrounding and,
at times, embedded in isolated nucleoli. In addition, specific
centromere proteins could be identified in immunoblots of protein
extracts from isolated nucleoli using human autoimmune sera. A 140-kDa
protein recognized by such sera in a nucleolar extract was enriched
relative to an equivalent protein load of nuclear extract (see Fig. 7 in Ref. 49). The speculation that this protein is CENP-C appears
reasonable considering that CENP-C is the only autoantigen of this size
known to be recognized by human anti-centromere antibodies. The results
from this study suggest that the presence of CENP-C in isolated
nucleoli may be mediated by specific interactions with the nucleolar
transcription factor UBF/NOR-90.
The finding that centromere proteins can be localized ultrastructurally
and biochemically to nucleoli is relevant for considering mechanisms of
autoimmunity. The presence of circulating autoantibodies that are
diverse, yet highly specific and unique for a particular disease is the
hallmark of many human autoimmune disorders. This has led to the
hypothesis that the immune response in systemic autoimmunity is
antigen-driven, a mechanism most easily understood if the antigens in
question reside together at some point in a common subcellular particle
that serves as the dominant autoantigen in the disease (50). The
antigens recognized by the immune system in scleroderma spectrum
disease all reside, at least transiently, in the nucleolus (49, 51).
Our demonstration that CENP-C physically interacts either directly or
indirectly with UBF/NOR-90 provides a possible biochemical link between
the anti-centromere and anti-nucleolar antibodies that characterize
scleroderma spectrum disease.
The biological significance of a biochemical interaction between a
kinetochore protein and a nucleolar protein is unclear. It is possible
that in vivo such an interaction could serve to regulate the
function of CENP-C during interphase by sequestering the protein and
its bound centromeric DNA, UBF/NOR-90, or both. Alternatively, the
association of CENP-C with nucleoli could play an architectural role in
the organization of the interphase nucleus. In any case, the
observation that only a subset of interphase centromeres is juxtaposed
with nucleoli at any point during interphase suggests that such an
interaction must be subject to control mechanisms that are not
currently understood. The theme of biochemical associations between
centromeres and nucleoli promises to lead to interesting insights into
novel aspects of centromere function during interphase.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by an Arthritis Investigator award
(to A. F. P.). The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Dermatology,
Ross Bldg., Rm. 771, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 720 Rutland Ave., Baltimore, MD 21205. Tel.: 410-550-5032; Fax:
410-955-0520; E-mail: apluta{at}welchlink.welch.jhu.edu.
§
Present address: Inst. of Cell and Molecular Biology, University of
Edinburgh, Michael Swann Bldg., Mayfield Rd., Edinburgh EH9 3JR,
Scotland.
1
The abbreviations used are: GST, glutathione
S-transferase; PIPES, 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic
acid.
2
I. Goldberg, unpublished data.
3
A. F. Pluta, unpublished data.
4
A. F. Pluta, I. Goldberg, and W. C. Earnshaw,
manuscript in preparation.
Acknowledgments
We thank D. Thrower for the generous supply
of HeLa nuclei, T. Formosa for advice about affinity chromatography, H. Saitoh for the construction of pTCATG, D. Hernandez-Verdun for the gift
of S14 serum, and H. Beckmann and R. Tjian for affinity-purified
anti-UBF antibodies and UBF protein. We are grateful to I. Goldberg and
Drs. A. Takahashi, C. Yang, and M. Monteiro for critical comments on
the manuscript. A. F. P. thanks Drs. A. Rosen, L. Casciola-Rosen, and
G. Anhalt for generosity and support during the completion of this
work.
REFERENCES
-
Brenner, S.,
Pepper, D.,
Berns, M. W.,
Tan, E.,
Brinkley, B. R.
(1981)
J. Cell Biol.
91,
95-102
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Moroi, Y.,
Hartman, A. L.,
Nakane, P. K.,
Tan, E. M.
(1981)
J. Cell Biol.
90,
254-259
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sullivan, K. F.,
Hechenberger, M.,
Masri, K.
(1994)
J. Cell. Biol.
127,
581-592
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Matsumoto, H.,
Masukata, H.,
Muro, Y.,
Nozaki, N.,
Okazaki, T.
(1989)
J. Cell Biol.
109,
1963-1973
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Earnshaw, W. C.,
Sullivan, K. F.,
Machlin, P. S.,
Cooke, C. A.,
Kaiser, D. A.,
Pollard, T. D.,
Rothfield, N. F.,
Cleveland, D. W.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
104,
817-829
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cooke, C. A.,
Bernat, R. L.,
Earnshaw, W. C.
(1990)
J. Cell Biol.
110,
1475-1488
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Saitoh, H.,
Tomkiel, J.,
Cooke, C. A.,
Ratrie, H., III,
Maurer, M.,
Rothfield, N. F.,
Earnshaw, W. C.
(1992)
Cell
70,
115-125
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Muro, Y.,
Matsumoto, H.,
Okazaki, T.,
Ohashi, M.
(1991)
J. Invest. Dermatol.
97,
378-380
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bernat, R. L.
(1991)
The Human Centromere Proteins CENP-A, -B, and -C: An In Vivo Analysis of Centromere Structure and Function
, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
-
Mitchison, T. J.,
Kirschner, M. W.
(1985)
J. Cell Biol.
101,
755-765
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wordeman, L.,
Steuer, E. R.,
Sheetz, M. P.,
Mitchison, T.
(1991)
J. Cell Biol.
114,
285-294
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Yen, T. J.,
Compton, D. A.,
Wise, D.,
Zinkowski, R. P.,
Brinkley, B.
R.,
Earnshaw, W. C.,
Cleveland, D. W.
(1991)
EMBO J.
10,
1245-1254
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Yen, T. J.,
Li, G.,
Scharr, B. T.,
Szilak, I.,
Cleveland, D. W.
(1992)
Nature
359,
536-539
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Earnshaw, W. C.,
Cooke, C. A.
(1991)
J. Cell Sci.
98,
443-461
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cooke, C. A.,
Heck, M. M. S.,
Earnshaw, W. C.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
2053-2067
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cyert, M. S.,
Scherson, T.,
Kirschner, M. W.
(1988)
Dev. Biol.
129,
209-216
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gorbsky, G. J.,
Ricketts, W. A.
(1993)
J. Cell Biol.
122,
1311-1321
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Casiano, C. A.,
Landberg, G.,
Ochs, R. L.,
Tan, E. M.
(1993)
J. Cell Sci.
106,
1045-1056
[Abstract]
-
Rattner, J. B.,
Rao, A.,
Fritzler, M. J.,
Valencia, D. W.,
Yen, T. J.
(1993)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
26,
214-226
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Earnshaw, W. C.,
Ratrie, H.,
Stetten, G.
(1989)
Chromosoma
(Berl.)
98,
1-12
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tomkiel, J.,
Cooke, C. A.,
Saitoh, H.,
Bernat, R. L.,
Earnshaw, W. C.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
125,
531-545
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Formosa, T.,
Barry, J.,
Alberts, B. M.,
Greenblatt, J.
(1991)
Methods Enzymol.
208,
24-45
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Earnshaw, W. C.,
Halligan, N.,
Cooke, C.,
Rothfield, N.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
98,
352-357
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pluta, A. F.,
Saitoh, N.,
Goldberg, I.,
Earnshaw, W. C.
(1992)
J. Cell Biol.
116,
1081-1093
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Roussel, P.,
Andre, C.,
Masson, C.,
Geraud, G.,
Hernandez-Verdun, D.
(1993)
J. Cell Sci.
104,
327-337
[Abstract]
-
Gyuris, J.,
Golemis, E.,
Chertkov, H.,
Brent, R.
(1993)
Cell
75,
791-803
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fields, S.,
Song, O.
(1989)
Nature
340,
245-246
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Formosa, T.,
Burke, R. L.,
Alberts, B. M.
(1983)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
80,
2442-2446
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Adolph, K. W.,
Cheng, S. M.,
Laemmli, U. K.
(1977)
Cell
12,
805-816
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Paulson, J. R.,
Laemmli, U. K.
(1977)
Cell
12,
817-828
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Matsumoto, H.,
Sugimoto, K.,
Okazaki, T.
(1989)
Exp. Cell Res.
181,
181-196
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jantzen, H.-M.,
Admon, A.,
Bell, S. P.,
Tjian, R.
(1990)
Nature
344,
830-836
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chan, E. K. L.,
Imai, H.,
Hamel, J. C.,
Tan, E. M.
(1991)
J. Exp. Med.
174,
1239-1244
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rodriguez-Sanchez, J. L.,
Gelpi, C.,
Juarez, C.,
Hardin, J. A.
(1987)
J. Immunol.
139,
2579-2584
[Abstract]
-
Yang, C. H.,
Tomkiel, J.,
Saitoh, H.,
Johnson, D. H.,
Earnshaw, W. C.
(1996)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16,
3576-3586
[Abstract]
-
Meluh, P. B.,
Koshland, D.
(1995)
Mol. Biol. Cell
6,
793-807
[Abstract]
-
Brown, M. T.
(1995)
Gene (Amst.)
160,
111-116
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cai, M.,
Davis, R. W.
(1990)
Cell
61,
437-446
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bram, R. J.,
Kornberg, R. D.
(1987)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7,
403-409
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mellor, J.,
Jiang, W.,
Funk, M.,
Rathjan, J.,
Barnes, C. A.,
Hinz, T.,
Hegemann, J. H.,
Philippsen, P.
(1990)
EMBO J.
8,
4017-4026
-
Bell, S. P.,
Learned, R. M.,
Jantzen, H.-M.,
Tjian, R.
(1988)
Science
241,
1192-1197
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jantzen, H.-M.,
Chow, A. M.,
King, D. S.,
Tjian, R.
(1992)
Genes Dev.
6,
1950-1963
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Earnshaw, W. C.
(1987)
J. Cell Biol.
105,
1479-1482
[Free Full Text]
-
Zhu, X.,
Mancini, M. A.,
Chang, K.-H.,
Liu, C.-Y.,
Chen, C.-F.,
Shan, B.,
Jones, D.,
Yang-Feng, T. L.,
Lee, W.-H.
(1995)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
15,
5017-5029
[Abstract]
-
Shan, B.,
Zhu, X.,
Chen, P.-L.,
Durfee, T.,
Yang, Y.,
Sharp, D.,
Lee, W.-H.
(1992)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
12,
5620-5631
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Cavanaugh, A. H.,
Hempel, W. H.,
Taylor, L. J.,
Rogalsky, V.,
Todorov, G.,
Rothblum, L. I.
(1995)
Nature
374,
177-180
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Meier, U. T.,
Blobel, G.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
127,
1505-1514
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jiang, W.,
Middleton, K.,
Yoon, H.-J.,
Fouquet, C.,
Carbon, J.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
4884-4893
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ochs, R. L.,
Press, R. I.
(1992)
Exp. Cell Res.
200,
339-350
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Tan, E. M.,
Chan, E. K. L.,
Sullivan, K. F.,
Rubin, R. L.
(1988)
Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol.
47,
121-141
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pollard, K. M., Reimer, G. & Tan, E. M. (1989) Clin. Exp.
Rheumatol. 7, Suppl. 3, 57-62
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Hemmerich, S. Weidtkamp-Peters, C. Hoischen, L. Schmiedeberg, I. Erliandri, and S. Diekmann
Dynamics of inner kinetochore assembly and maintenance in living cells
J. Cell Biol.,
March 24, 2008;
180(6):
1101 - 1114.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. H. Wong, K. H. Brettingham-Moore, L. Chan, J. M. Quach, M. A. Anderson, E. L. Northrop, R. Hannan, R. Saffery, M. L. Shaw, E. Williams, et al.
Centromere RNA is a key component for the assembly of nucleoproteins at the nucleolus and centromere
Genome Res.,
August 1, 2007;
17(8):
1146 - 1160.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. J. Faragher, X.-M. Sun, M. Butterworth, N. Harper, M. Mulheran, S. Ruchaud, W. C. Earnshaw, and G. M. Cohen
Death Receptor-induced Apoptosis Reveals a Novel Interplay between the Chromosomal Passenger Complex and CENP-C during Interphase
Mol. Biol. Cell,
April 1, 2007;
18(4):
1337 - 1347.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Suzuki, M. Nakano, N. Nozaki, S.-i. Egashira, T. Okazaki, and H. Masumoto
CENP-B Interacts with CENP-C Domains Containing Mif2 Regions Responsible for Centromere Localization
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 13, 2004;
279(7):
5934 - 5946.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. Hari, K. R. Cook, and G. H. Karpen
The Drosophila Su(var)2-10 locus re | |