JBC Biosymposia, Inc.

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Eva, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zheng, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Eva, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Volume 271, Number 32, Issue of August 9, 1996 pp. 19017-19020
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

COMMUNICATION:
The Pleckstrin Homology Domain Mediates Transformation by Oncogenic Dbl through Specific Intracellular Targeting*

(Received for publication, May 21, 1996)

Yi Zheng Dagger §, Daniela Zangrilli , Richard A. Cerione Dagger par and Alessandra Eva ''

From the Dagger  Department of Pharmacology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853-6401 and the  Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgment
REFERENCES


ABSTRACT

The pleckstrin homology (PH) domain is an ~100 amino acid structural motif found in many cellular signaling molecules, including the Dbl oncoprotein and related, putative guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs). Here we have examined the role of the Dbl PH (dPH) domain in the activities of oncogenic Dbl. We report that the dPH domain is not involved in the interaction of Dbl with small GTP-binding proteins and is incapable of transforming NIH 3T3 fibroblasts. On the other hand, co-expression of the dPH domain with oncogenic Dbl inhibits Dbl-induced transformation. A deletion mutant of Dbl that lacks a significant portion of the PH domain retains full GEF activity, but is completely inactive in transformation assays. Replacement of the PH domain by the membrane-targeting sequence of Ras is not sufficient for the recovery of transforming activity. However, subcellular fractionations of Dbl and Dbl mutants revealed that the PH domain is necessary and sufficient for the association of Dbl with the Triton X-100-insoluble cytoskeletal components. Thus, our results suggest that the dPH domain mediates cellular transformation by targeting the Dbl protein to specific cytoskeletal locations to activate Rho-type small GTP-binding proteins.


INTRODUCTION

The cytoskeletal-associated Dbl oncoprotein transforms NIH 3T3 cells (1) by activation of signaling pathways involving Rho-type GTP-binding proteins (2). Proto-Dbl is a 115-kDa cytoskeletal-associated protein that is found in brain, adrenal glands, and gonads (1). Oncogenic activation occurs as an outcome of an amino-terminal truncation of proto-Dbl, where a recombination event fuses about 10 kDa of an unidentified human gene product (from chromosome 3) on to the carboxyl-terminal half of Dbl (residues 498-925). The oncogenic Dbl protein contains at least two putative signaling motifs. The first is a region of 176 amino acids (residues 498-674) that was originally found to share significant homology with the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell-division-cycle protein, Cdc24, and the breakpoint cluster region protein, Bcr1 (3). This region, referred to as the Dbl homology (DH) domain, has been shown to be essential both for the transformation activity of oncogenic Dbl and for its ability to act as a GEF by stimulating the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of Cdc42Hs (4, 5). The second putative signaling motif is the pleckstrin homology (PH) domain (6, 7) and includes residues 703-812. Although PH domains appear to be relatively poorly conserved, both NMR and x-ray crystallographic studies of the PH domains of pleckstrin, dynamin, and spectrin indicate that they adopt a common three-dimensional structural motif (8, 9, 10, 11).

Over the past few years, a growing family of oncogene products and other growth regulatory proteins have been shown to contain a DH domain in tandem with a PH domain. In addition to Cdc24 and Bcr, these include the Vav, Ost, Ect-2, Lbc, Lfc, and Dbs oncoproteins (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17) and the activators of the Ras proteins, Sos (18), and Ras-GRF (19). All indications from previous studies are that the DH domain will form a binding site and in many cases contain GEF activity for Rho-like GTP-binding proteins (8, 9, 13, 14, 20, 21, 22). However, less is known about the roles of the PH domains. In the present study, we have used the Dbl oncoprotein as a model to examine the role of the PH domain in cellular transformation and GEF activity.


EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

cDNA Transfection Studies

Transfection assays were done on duplicate cultures by adding 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1 µg of DNA to the recipient NIH 3T3 cells using the Ca2+-phosphate precipitation method (3). Foci (focus forming units) were scored 14 days after transfection, and the results were calculated as number of foci/pmol of DNA. The results listed in Fig. 1 and shown in Fig. 2C are the mean values of three transfection assays. Growth in soft agar was examined as described by Ron et al. (3).


Fig. 1. Schematic representations of oncogenic Dbl and different mutants of Dbl used in this study. The abilities of these constructs to serve as GEFs for Rho and Cdc42Hs and to transform NIH 3T3 cells are summarized. pdDH represents the Dbl homology domain and pdPH is the pleckstrin homology domain. The abbreviation ffu represents focus forming units. 100% is 3 × 105 foci/pmol DNA. pDHF is a construct in which the PH domain sequences downstream from residue 750 are replaced with the carboxyl-terminal 16 amino acids of Ha-Ras, which include both the palmitylation and farnesylation sites (black rectangle). pdHF* is a construct encoding the DH domain of Dbl and the carboxyl-terminal 16 amino acids of Ha-Ras, except that the cysteine, which is normally farnesylated, has been changed to serine (cross-hatched rectangle). The GEF activity for these constructs has not been determined (N/A). The pdDH, pdDHF, and pdDHF* were subcloned from dbl by the polymerase chain reaction and inserted into the mammalian expression vector pZipneo. The GEF activities were measured as described (5) by the in vitro nitrocellulose filter binding assay either using the anti-Dbl immunoprecipitates from the NIH 3T3 transfectants (proto-Dbl, Dbl, and pMA4) or using the insect cell expressed peptides (DH and PH).
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]


Fig. 2. Expression of the PH domain inhibits Dbl-induced transformation in NIH 3T3 cells. A, detection of the Dbl oncoprotein (using an anti-Dbl antibody) in NIH 3T3 transfectants. Lane 1 represents cells expressing the Dbl oncoprotein. Lane 2 represents cells co-expressing Dbl and the Dbl PH domain (dPH). Lane 3 represents cells co-expressing Dbl and the Vav PH domain. Lane 4 is a control, i.e. cells transfected with the plasmid (pFlag) used to express the PH domains. B, detection of the PH domains of Dbl and Vav (using M5 anti-Flag antibody) in NIH 3T3 cells. Lane 1 represents cells co-expressing Dbl and the Dbl PH domain (dPH). Lane 2 represents cells co-expressing Dbl and the Vav PH domain. Lane 3 is a control (cells transfected with the pFlag plasmid). C, effects of the PH domains of Dbl and Vav on Dbl-induced foci-formation. pFlag/PHdbl and pKH3/PHdbl represent the mammalian expression vectors encoding the Dbl PH domain and pFlag/PHvav and pKH3/PHvav are the expression vectors encoding the Vav PH domain. The results shown represent the average of three independent experiments.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]

Cellular Fractionation Studies

Control NIH 3T3 and different NIH 3T3 transfectants were lysed and fractionated into cytosolic (S), Triton X-100-solubilized membrane fractions (T), and Triton X-100-insoluble fractions (I) as described by Graziani et al. (1). Cells were labeled with [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine for 3 h at 37 °C. Specific Dbl products were detected by immunoprecipitation using anti-Dbl-2 antibodies (3), electrophoresed through a 12% polyacrylamide gel and autoradiographed. For the detection of the PH domains (e.g. Figs. 2B and 4D, below), cells were immunoprecipitated with anti-Flag M5 antibodies and electrophoresed through a 15% polyacrylamide gel followed by immunoblotting with anti-Flag M5 antibodies.

Measurements of GDP Dissociation from Cdc42Hs

The [3H]GDP dissociation assays were carried out as described previously (4, 5). In Fig. 3A, the amounts of GST-Dbl and GST-DH (see Fig. 1) purified from Sf9 insect cells were estimated by Coomassie Blue staining after SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. ~200 nM of GST-Dbl or GST-DH were incubated with 1 µg of RhoA protein preloaded with [3H]GDP in 100 µl of reaction buffer at room temperature, and 16-µl aliquots were diluted into 5 ml of ice-cold termination buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, and 100 mM NaCl) at various time points. In Fig. 3B, 1 µg of [3H]GDP-bound RhoA was incubated with 2 µM GST, 2 µM GST-PH (a fusion protein containing GST and the pleckstrin homology domain from the Dbl protein), 300 µM GST-Dbl, or 300 µM GST-Dbl and 2 µM GST-PH in a 100-µl reaction mixture.


Fig. 3. The PH domain is not directly involved in the regulation of the GEF activity of the Dbl oncoprotein. A, comparison of the abilities of oncogenic Dbl (black-square) and the DH domain of Dbl (black-triangle) to stimulate [3H]GDP dissociation of RhoA. The dissociation of [3H]GDP from RhoA, alone, is depicted by (square ). B, effect of the PH domain on the kinetics of Dbl-stimulated [3H]GDP dissociation from RhoA. black-square represents Dbl-stimulated GDP dissociation in the absence of the PH domain and black-diamond  represents Dbl-stimulated GDP dissociation in the presence of the PH domain. square  and diamond  represent the corresponding controls for RhoA in the absence of Dbl.
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

To investigate the role of the PH domain in cellular transformation mediated by the oncogenic Dbl protein, we analyzed several Dbl mutants for transforming activity in NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 1). We found that while the transforming capability of a deletion mutant containing primarily the DH and PH domains (designated as pMA4 in Fig. 1) was similar to that of the Dbl oncogene product, neither the DH domain nor the PH domain (pdDH and pdPH, respectively) alone showed any detectable effects on the growth of 3T3 fibroblasts. However, when Dbl and pdPH were co-expressed in NIH 3T3 cells (dbl+pFlag/PHdbl, Fig. 2C), we observed a significant reduction of the transforming activity by Dbl. Co-expression of Dbl with a Flag-tagged PH domain of the Dbl-related Vav oncoprotein (12), on the other hand, showed effects comparable with those obtained with the pFlag/neo vector control (Fig. 2C), even though it appeared to be more highly expressed (Fig. 2B, lane 2) than the PH domain of Dbl (Fig. 2B, lane 1). The level of expression of the Dbl oncoprotein was essentially equivalent in all cases (Fig. 2A).

To further confirm the selective inhibition of Dbl-induced transformation by the dPH domain, we used a second mammalian expression vector, pKH3 (23), to express the PH domain from either Dbl, Vav, or from the related yeast Cdc24 protein (20), together with the Dbl oncogene product. As shown in Fig. 2C, the expression of the dPH domain inhibited the focus-forming activity of oncogenic Dbl by ~40%, whereas co-expression of Dbl with the PH domain of Vav (pKH3/PHvav) had little effect. Mass populations of these transfected cells also were examined for their ability to display anchorage-independent growth. We observed that cells co-expressing Dbl and the dPH domain lost the ability to grow in soft agar (data not shown). In some cases, we found that expression of a Flag-tagged PH domain of Vav caused some inhibition of Dbl-induced growth in soft agar, suggesting that the Vav PH domain (perhaps when expressed at sufficient levels) was capable of competing with the PH domain of Dbl for a cellular target. However, it is likely that the Vav PH domain is a weak competitor, since we often observed no detectable effects with either the Flag-tagged protein or when expressing the PH domain of Vav from the pKH3 vector. We also have found no detectable effects on Dbl transformation when expressing the PH domain from Cdc24 (data not shown). Mass cultures of Dbl transfectants expressing the dPH domain also displayed a less transformed phenotype compared with Dbl transfectants alone or compared with cells co-expressing Dbl and the PH domain of Vav (data not shown). Taken together, these results suggest that the PH domain of Dbl behaves as a selective antagonist of Dbl-induced transformation, possibly by binding to a saturable and specific ligand in cells.

Previously we have shown that the DH domain alone is sufficient for the GEF activity for Cdc42Hs (5). Since oncogenic Dbl also stimulates the guanine nucleotide exchange activity of Rho, we examined whether the Dbl domain is sufficient for stimulating the activation of Rho. To do this, we compared Rho-GEF activities of approximately equal amounts (~200 nM) of insect cell-expressed, purified GST-Dbl and GST-DH domain. No significant differences were observed for the abilities of the GST-Dbl and GST-DH to stimulate [3H]GDP dissociation from RhoA (Fig. 3A). These results suggest that the PH domain does not contribute to the GEF function of Dbl. This is further reinforced by the results in Fig. 3B, which show that the addition of excess Escherichia coli recombinant PH domain to GEF assay mixtures containing [3H]GDP-bound RhoA and recombinant GST-Dbl has no detectable effect on the time-course of GST-Dbl-stimulated [3H]GDP dissociation from RhoA. The GST-PH domain, alone, also shows no ability to stimulate [3H]GDP dissociation from RhoA (compared with GST alone). Similar results were also obtained with [3H]GDP-bound Cdc42Hs (data not shown). Thus, the dPH domain is not involved in the interactions of Dbl with RhoA and Cdc42Hs or in the direct regulation of the GEF catalytic activity of the DH domain.

The membrane association of beta ARK and spectrin has been attributed to their PH domains (24, 25). The PH domains of beta ARK, BTK, PLCgamma , IRS-1, and Ras-GRF have been shown to bind to plasma membrane-associated beta gamma subunits of the heterotrimeric G-proteins (26, 27), and they all behave as antagonists of Gbeta gamma -mediated signaling (28). Recent evidence also suggests that PH domains from many signaling molecules including beta ARK and Ras-GAP can bind to specific phospholipids, namely phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) (29). These findings raised the possibility that the PH domain mediates the membrane targeting of oncogenic Dbl. It has been shown that the introduction of a membrane-targeting sequence into the Ras GEFs, Cdc25 and Sos (30, 31), was sufficient to activate Ras, and more recently, that the addition of a membrane-targeting sequence in place of the PH domain of the Lfc oncoprotein was able to restore full transformation activity (32). Thus, we examined whether the substitution of the dPH domain with a membrane-targeting sequence enabled the DH domain of Dbl to induce transformation. A chimeric molecule containing the DH domain (residues 498-756) fused to the Ras membrane-targeting farnesylation signal sequence (designated pdHF in Fig. 1) was constructed and assayed for focus-forming activity in NIH 3T3 cells. This chimera was expressed at a comparable level to oncogenic Dbl and a percentage (10-20%) of the total chimeric molecules was targeted to the membrane surface (i.e. the Triton X-100 solubilized fraction (T) in Fig. 4A). However, this did not restore transforming activity to the DH domain (Fig. 1). Although, one possible explanation is that the amount of the chimera expressed at the membrane surface was not sufficient to stimulate a transforming signal, this does not seem likely based on what we have observed regarding the range of expression of oncogenic Dbl that will yield cellular transformation (34).


Fig. 4. The PH domain mediates the cytoskeletal association of the Dbl oncoprotein. A, the membrane attachment signal from Ha-Ras targets the DH domain to the Triton X-100-soluble fraction from cell membranes. pZIPneo/DHF (see Fig. 1) represents the construct encoding the DH domain of Dbl and the carboxyl-terminal 16 amino acids of Ha-Ras, including the palmitylation and farnesylation sites. pZIPneo/DHF* represents the construct encoding the DH domain of Dbl and the carboxyl-terminal 16 amino acids of Ha-Ras (except that the cysteine which serves as the farnesylation site has been changed to serine). S represents the soluble fraction, T is the Triton X-100-soluble fraction from membranes, and I is the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction. B, oncogenic Dbl is associated with the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction of cells. C, fractionations of the pMA4 and DH domain transfectants. D, fractionation of cells expressing the Dbl PH domain. The data shown in A-C were obtained by immunoprecipitating the Dbl proteins with the anti-Dbl antibody from cells that were labeled with [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine. The data shown in D represent immunoblots using the anti-Flag M5 antibody.
[View Larger Version of this Image (26K GIF file)]

We have reported previously that significant portions of both proto- and oncogenic Dbl are localized to the Triton X-100-insoluble fractions of transfected NIH 3T3 cells, suggesting an association with the cytoskeletal matrix (1). To address the possible role of the dPH domain in mediating this pattern of localization for the Dbl protein, stable transfectants of Dbl and Dbl deletion mutants (Fig. 1) were subjected to subcellular fractionation. The crude membrane fractions (P100) of the cells were solubilized either by 1% Triton X-100 or by treatment with 0.1% SDS and 0.25% sodium deoxycholate. Anti-Dbl immunoprecipitates revealed that a percentage of both the intact oncogenic Dbl protein and a truncation mutant pMA4 associated with the Triton X-100-insoluble fractions of cells (designated by I in Fig. 4, B and C). The amounts of oncogenic Dbl and pMA4 that were present in the Triton X-100-insoluble fraction typically varied between 50 and 70% of the total detectable protein, although in some cases (Fig. 4B) the percentage of oncogenic Dbl in this fraction was less than 50%. However, the DH domain of Dbl, which lacks transforming ability, was localized exclusively to the cytosolic fraction (designated S in Fig. 4C). When cells expressing the Flag-tagged PH domains were subjected to similar fractionation, the PH domains were found associated with the Triton X-100-insoluble fractions (Fig. 4D). These results suggest that the dPH domain is directly responsible for the association of oncogenic Dbl with the Triton X-100-insoluble cytoskeletal fraction and thus may serve to target the catalytic DH domain to the cytoskeleton.

We have reported previously that the DH domain is responsible for Dbl GEF function and is required for Dbl transforming activity (3, 5). Here, we demonstrate that while the dPH domain does not seem to be involved in the interactions of Rho-type small GTP-binding proteins with Dbl, it is essential for Dbl transforming activity. Thus, our present findings establish that both the DH and PH domains are required for the cellular function of Dbl. Indeed, the minimum structural unit (pMA4) of oncogenic Dbl conferring complete transforming activity just encompasses the DH domain and the PH domain. The finding that plasma membrane-targeting of Dbl is not sufficient to confer transforming activity, coupled with the requirement of the dPH domain as the necessary and sufficient element for association of the Dbl protein with the Triton X-100-insoluble component, suggests that the function of the PH domain resides in its ability to target the catalytic DH domain to the cytoskeletal matrix. Whether this targeting function holds for other members of Dbl-related GEF family proteins remains to be seen. However, based on the observation that the PH domains of Dbl-related molecules Vav and Cdc24 do not act effectively as inhibitors of Dbl-induced transformation, it is an attractive possibility that different members of the family of Dbl-related proteins may be targeted by their PH domains to distinct cellular locations to activate various Rho-type GTP-binding proteins, in response to different extracellular stimuli such as epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, lysophosphatidic acid, and bradykinin. This may also explain the finding that substitution of a membrane-targeting (i.e. Ras-farnesylation) sequence for the PH domain of Lfc restored its transformation capability (32), whereas this substitution did not restore transforming activity to a Dbl protein that just contains the DH domain. It may be that Lfc needs to be targeted to the plasma membrane to optimally couple to other protein components in its signaling pathway while Dbl needs to be targeted to a cytoskeletal location.

The identity of the ligand(s) that binds to the PH domain of oncogenic Dbl will represent an important focus of future studies. It seems likely, that given the hypervariable nature of the putative ligand-binding cleft in the PH domains that have thus far been identified (33), a complex diversity of ligands may exist that are responsible for mediating the actions of various PH domain-containing signaling molecules, including Dbl and related regulatory molecules of small GTP-binding proteins.


FOOTNOTES

*   This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM47458 (to R. A. C.), by Grant 4015 from the Council for Tobacco Research (to R. A. C.), by USAMRDC Grant DAMD17-94-J-4123 (to R. A. C.), and by grants from Ministero della Sanita, Progetto Finalizzato ICS070.2/RF95.221 and from the Italian Association for Cancer Research (to A. E.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§   Present address: Dept. of Biochemistry, University of Tennessee, Memphis, TN 38163.
par    To whom correspondence should be addressed.
''   Present address: Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Istituto G. Gaslini, via 5 Maggio, Genova Quarto, Italy.
1   The abbreviations used are: Bcr, break point cluster region protein; DH, Dbl homology; PH, pleckstrin homology; GAPs, GTPase-activating proteins for low molecular mass GTP-binding proteins; GRF, guanine nucleotide-releasing factor; GEFs, guanine nucleotide-exchange factor for low molecular mass GTP-binding proteins; GST, glutathione S-transferase.

Acknowledgment

We thank Cindy Westmiller for expert secretarial assistance.


REFERENCES

  1. Graziani, G., Ron, D., Eva, A., Srivastava, S. K. (1989) Oncogene 4, 823-829 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Musacchio, A., Gibson, T., Rice, P., Thompson, J., Saraste, M. (1993) Trends Biol. Sci. 18, 343-348
  3. Ron, D., Zannini, M., Lewis, M., Wickner, R. B., Hunt, L. T., Graziani, G., Tronick, S. R., Aaronson, S. A., Eva, A. (1991) New Biol. 3, 372-379 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Hart, M. J., Eva, A., Evans, T., Aaronson, S. A., Cerione, R. A. (1991) Nature 354, 311-314 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Hart, M. J., Eva, A., Zangrilli, D., Aaronson, S. A., Evans, T., Cerione, R. A., Zheng, Y. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 62-65 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Haslam, R. J., Koide, H. B., Hemmings, B. A. (1993) Nature 363, 309-310 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Mayer, B. J., Ren, R., Clark, K. L., Baltimore, D. (1993) Cell 73, 629-630 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Yoon, H. S., Hajduk, P. J., Petros, A. M., Olejniczak, E. T., Meadows, R. P., Fesik, S. W. (1994) Nature 369, 672-675 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Macias, M. J., Musacchio, A., Ponstingl, H., Nilges, M., Saraste, M., Oschkinate, H. (1994) Nature 369, 675-677 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Timm, D., Salim, K., Gout, I., Guruprasad, L., Waterfield, M., Blundell, T. (1994) Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 782-788 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Ferguson, K. M., Lemmon, M. A., Schlessinger, J., Sigler, P. B. (1994) Cell 79, 199-209 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Katzav, S., Martin-Zanca, D., Barbacid, M. (1989) EMBO J. 8, 2283-2290 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Miki, T., Smith, C. L., Long, J. E., Eva, A., Fleming, T. (1993) Nature 362, 462-465 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Horii, Y., Beeler, J. F., Sakagrichi, K., Tachibana, M., Miki, T. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 4776-4786 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Toksoz, D., Williams, D. A. (1994) Oncogene 9, 621-628 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Whitehead, I., Kirk, H., Tognon, C., Trigo-Gonzalez, G., Kay, R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18388-18395 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Whitehead, I., Kirk, H., Kay, R. (1995) Oncogene 10, 713-721 [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Bowtell, D., Fu, P., Simon, M., Senior, P. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 89, 6511-6515 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Shou, C., Farnsworth, C. L., Neel, B. G., Feig, L. A. (1992) Nature 358, 351-354 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Zheng, Y., Cerione, R. A., Bender, A. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 2369-2372 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Zheng, Y., Olson, M. F., Hall, A., Cerione, R. A., Toksoz, D. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 9031-9034 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Chuang, T. H., Xu, X., Kaartinen, V., Heisterkamp, N., Groffen, J., Bokoch, G. M. (1995) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 92, 10282-10286 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Mattingly, R. R., Sorisky, A., Brann, M. R., Macara, I. G. (1994) Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 7943-7952 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Luttrell, L. M., Hawes, B. E., Touhara, K., van Biesen, T., Koch, W. J., Lefkowitz, R. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 12984-12989 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Davis, L., Bennett, V. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 4409-4416 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Touhara, K., Inglese, J., Pitcher, J. A., Shaw, G., Lefkowitz, R. J. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10217-10220 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tsukada, S., Simon, M. I., Witte, O. N., Katz, A. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 11256-11260 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Pitcher, J. A., Touhara, K., Payne, E. S., Lefkowitz, R. J. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 11707-11710 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Harlen, J. E., Hajduk, P. J., Yoon, H. S., Fesik, S. W. (1994) Nature 371, 168-170 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  30. Aronheim, A., Engelberg, D., Li, N., Al-Alawi, N., Schlessinger, J., Karin, M. (1994) Cell 78, 949-961 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  31. Quilliam, L. A., Huff, S. Y., Rabun, K. M., Wei, W., Park, W., Broek, D., Der, C. J. (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 91, 8512-8516 [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Whitehead, I., Kirk, H., Tognon, C., Trigo-Gonzalez, G., Kay, R. (1995) J. Biol. Chem. 270, 18388-18395
  33. Gibson, T. J., Hyvonen, M., Musacchio, A., Saraste, M. (1994) Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 349-353 [CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. Srivastava, S. K., Wheelock, R. H. P., Aaronson, S. A., Eva, A. (1986) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 8868-8872 [Abstract/Free Full Text]

©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. E. Joseph and F. A. Norris
Substrate Specificity and Recognition Is Conferred by the Pleckstrin Homology Domain of the Dbl Family Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor P-Rex2
J. Biol. Chem., July 29, 2005; 280(30): 27508 - 27512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. P. Kauppinen, F. Duan, J. I. Wels, and D. Manor
Regulation of the Dbl Proto-oncogene by Heat Shock Cognate Protein 70 (Hsc70)
J. Biol. Chem., June 3, 2005; 280(22): 21638 - 21644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
H. Qin, H. S. Carr, X. Wu, D. Muallem, N. H. Tran, and J. A. Frost
Characterization of the Biochemical and Transforming Properties of the Neuroepithelial Transforming Protein 1
J. Biol. Chem., March 4, 2005; 280(9): 7603 - 7613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. V. Kostenko, G. M. Mahon, L. Cheng, and I. P. Whitehead
The Sec14 Homology Domain Regulates the Cellular Distribution and Transforming Activity of the Rho-specific Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Dbs
J. Biol. Chem., January 28, 2005; 280(4): 2807 - 2817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. Kristelly, G. Gao, and J. J. G. Tesmer
Structural Determinants of RhoA Binding and Nucleotide Exchange in Leukemia-associated Rho Guanine-Nucleotide Exchange Factor
J. Biol. Chem., November 5, 2004; 279(45): 47352 - 47362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. Yoshizuka, R. Moriuchi, T. Mori, K. Yamada, S. Hasegawa, T. Maeda, T. Shimada, Y. Yamada, S. Kamihira, M. Tomonaga, et al.
An Alternative Transcript Derived from the Trio Locus Encodes a Guanosine Nucleotide Exchange Factor with Mouse Cell-transforming Potential
J. Biol. Chem., October 15, 2004; 279(42): 43998 - 44004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Kanekura, Y. Hashimoto, T. Niikura, S. Aiso, M. Matsuoka, and I. Nishimoto
Alsin, the Product of ALS2 Gene, Suppresses SOD1 Mutant Neurotoxicity through RhoGEF Domain by Interacting with SOD1 Mutants
J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 19247 - 19256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
J. Banerjee and P. B. Wedegaertner
Identification of a Novel Sequence in PDZ-RhoGEF That Mediates Interaction with the Actin Cytoskeleton
Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2004; 15(4): 1760 - 1775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. J. Fuentes, A. E. Karnoub, M. A. Booden, C. J. Der, and S. L. Campbell
Critical Role of the Pleckstrin Homology Domain in Dbs Signaling and Growth Regulation
J. Biol. Chem., May 30, 2003; 278(23): 21188 - 21196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. L. Rossman, L. Cheng, G. M. Mahon, R. J. Rojas, J. T. Snyder, I. P. Whitehead, and J. Sondek
Multifunctional Roles for the PH Domain of Dbs in Regulating Rho GTPase Activation
J. Biol. Chem., May 9, 2003; 278(20): 18393 - 18400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. Shimizu, M. Okada, K. Nagai, and Y. Fukada
Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Circadian Oscillatory Protein, a Novel Binding Partner of K-Ras in the Membrane Rafts, Negatively Regulates MAPK Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., April 18, 2003; 278(17): 14920 - 14925.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. A. Baumeister, L. Martinu, K. L. Rossman, J. Sondek, M. A. Lemmon, and M. M. Chou
Loss of Phosphatidylinositol 3-Phosphate Binding by the C-terminal Tiam-1 Pleckstrin Homology Domain Prevents in Vivo Rac1 Activation without Affecting Membrane Targeting
J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2003; 278(13): 11457 - 11464.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. R. Palmby, K. Abe, and C. J. Der
Critical Role of the Pleckstrin Homology and Cysteine-rich Domains in Vav Signaling and Transforming Activity
J. Biol. Chem., October 11, 2002; 277(42): 39350 - 39359.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
A. Schmidt and A. Hall
Guanine nucleotide exchange factors for Rho GTPases: turning on the switch
Genes & Dev., July 1, 2002; 16(13): 1587 - 1609.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Vanni, P. Mancini, Y. Gao, C. Ottaviano, F. Guo, B. Salani, M. R. Torrisi, Y. Zheng, and A. Eva
Regulation of Proto-Dbl by Intracellular Membrane Targeting and Protein Stability
J. Biol. Chem., May 24, 2002; 277(22): 19745 - 19753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
E. Hirsch, M. Pozzato, A. Vercelli, L. Barberis, O. Azzolino, C. Russo, C. Vanni, L. Silengo, A. Eva, and F. Altruda
Defective Dendrite Elongation but Normal Fertility in Mice Lacking the Rho-Like GTPase Activator Dbl
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2002; 22(9): 3140 - 3148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
T. Schmelzle, S. B. Helliwell, and M. N. Hall
Yeast Protein Kinases and the RHO1 Exchange Factor TUS1 Are Novel Components of the Cell Integrity Pathway in Yeast
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2002; 22(5): 1329 - 1339.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Gao, J. Xing, M. Streuli, T. L. Leto, and Y. Zheng
Trp56 of Rac1 Specifies Interaction with a Subset of Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors
J. Biol. Chem., December 7, 2001; 276(50): 47530 - 47541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
F. Bi, B. Debreceni, K. Zhu, B. Salani, A. Eva, and Y. Zheng
Autoinhibition Mechanism of Proto-Dbl
Mol. Cell. Biol., March 1, 2001; 21(5): 1463 - 1474.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. Zhu, B. Debreceni, F. Bi, and Y. Zheng
Oligomerization of DH Domain Is Essential for Dbl-Induced Transformation
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2001; 21(2): 425 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
C.-G. Koh, E. Manser, Z.-S. Zhao, C.-P. Ng, and L. Lim
{beta}1PIX, the PAK-interacting exchange factor, requires localization via a coiled-coil region to promote microvillus-like structures and membrane ruffles
J. Cell Sci., January 12, 2001; 114(23): 4239 - 4251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
Y. Takai, T. Sasaki, and T. Matozaki
Small GTP-Binding Proteins
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2001; 81(1): 153 - 208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. M. Kriauciunas, M. G. Myers Jr., and C. R. Kahn
Cellular Compartmentalization in Insulin Action: Altered Signaling by a Lipid-Modified IRS-1
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2000; 20(18): 6849 - 6859.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
D. D. Billadeau, S. M. Mackie, R. A. Schoon, and P. J. Leibson
The Rho Family Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor Vav-2 Regulates the Development of Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity
J. Exp. Med., August 8, 2000; 192(3): 381 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
E. Liao, B. Paw, L. Peters, A Zapata, S. Pratt, C. Do, G Lieschke, and L. Zon
Hereditary spherocytosis in zebrafish riesling illustrates evolution of erythroid beta-spectrin structure, and function in red cell morphogenesis and membrane stability
Development, January 12, 2000; 127(23): 5123 - 5132.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-P. Mira, V. Benard, J. Groffen, L. C. Sanders, and U. G. Knaus
Endogenous, hyperactive Rac3 controls proliferation of breast cancer cells by a p21-activated kinase-dependent pathway
PNAS, January 4, 2000; 97(1): 185 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Med.Home page
R. Arudchandran, M. J. Brown, M. J. Peirce, J. S. Song, J. Zhang, R. P. Siraganian, U. Blank, and J. Rivera
The Src Homology 2 Domain of Vav Is Required for Its Compartmentation to the Plasma Membrane and Activation of c-Jun NH2-terminal Kinase 1
J. Exp. Med., January 3, 2000; 191(1): 47 - 60.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
I. P. Whitehead, Q. T. Lambert, J. A. Glaven, K. Abe, K. L. Rossman, G. M. Mahon, J. M. Trzaskos, R. Kay, S. L. Campbell, and C. J. Der
Dependence of Dbl and Dbs Transformation on MEK and NF-kappa B Activation
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 1999; 19(11): 7759 - 7770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
N. Movilla and X. R. Bustelo
Biological and Regulatory Properties of Vav-3, a New Member of the Vav Family of Oncoproteins
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 1999; 19(11): 7870 - 7885.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. D. Ma and C. S. Abrams
Pleckstrin Induces Cytoskeletal Reorganization via a Rac-dependent Pathway
J. Biol. Chem., October 1, 1999; 274(40): 28730 - 28735.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S. N. Prokopenko, A. Brumby, L. O'Keefe, L. Prior, Y. He, R. Saint, and H. J. Bellen
A putative exchange factor for Rho1 GTPase is required for initiation of cytokinesis in Drosophila
Genes & Dev., September 1, 1999; 13(17): 2301 - 2314.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
R. H. Daniels, F. T. Zenke, and G. M. Bokoch
alpha Pix Stimula