|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Received for publication, March 19, 1996, and in revised form, May 16, 1996)
From the Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Mount Sinai
School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029
Kv1.1 potassium (K+) channels contain
significant amounts of negatively charged sialic acids. To examine the
role of sialidation in K+ channel function, Chinese hamster
ovary cell lines deficient in glycosylation (Lec mutants) were
transfected with rat brain Kv1.1 cDNA. The K+ channel
was functionally expressed in all cell lines, but the voltage
dependence of activation (V1/2) was shifted to more
positive voltages and the activation kinetics were slower in the mutant
cell lines compared with control. A similar positive shift in
V1/2 was recorded in control cells expressing Kv1.1
following treatment with sialidase or by raising extracellular
Ca2+. In contrast, these treatments had little or no effect
on the Lec mutants, which indicates that channel sialic acids appear to
be the negative surface charges sensitive to Ca2+. The data
suggest that sialic acid addition modifies Kv1.1 channel function,
possibly by influencing the local electric field detected by its
voltage sensor, but that these carbohydrates are not required for cell
surface expression.
Potassium (K+) channels are responsible for numerous
important neuronal processes that include setting the resting membrane
potential, controlling electrical excitability, and shaping action
potential duration and waveform (1, 2, 3). Molecular cloning approaches
have led to the identification of a large family of distinct
voltage-gated K+ channels that can be divided into four
subfamilies, Shaker (Kv1), Shab (Kv2),
Shaw (Kv3), and Shal (Kv4). Mutagenesis studies
have revealed structural determinants within the core K+
channel protein that underlie many of its functional properties (4, 5, 6, 7, 8).
For example, the S4 transmembrane domain, which contains evenly spaced
positively charged arginine and lysine residues, has been implicated as
a voltage sensor region in both Na+ and K+
channels (9, 10, 11, 12, 13). Other regions of the core K+ channel
protein such as the S4-S5 cytoplasmic linker are also involved in
voltage-dependent activation because mutations in this
region shift the voltage required for half-maximal activation
dramatically (14, 15).
In contrast with the functional motifs uncovered within the core
protein, much less is known about the role of posttranslational
modifications in determining K+ channel function. Both
voltage-gated Na+ and some K+ channels are
glycoproteins that in comparison with other membrane glycoproteins
contain unusually large amounts of posttranslationally attached sialic
acids. Compositional analysis of purified Na+ channels
(16, 17, 18, 19) and sialidase sensitivity of some Shaker-type
K+ channels from brain (20, 21, 22) have suggested that they
contain 120-220 negatively charged sialic acids per functional
molecule. Glycosylation is thought to be important for membrane protein
folding and cell surface targeting and in some cases function (23). For
example, sialidase treatment of Na+ channels shifted its
steady state activation curve to more positive voltages when they were
analyzed in planar lipid bilayers (24). This observation suggested that
the negatively charged channel sialic acids play a role in voltage
gating by influencing the local electric field detected by the voltage
sensor on the molecule. In support of such a mechanism, earlier studies
suggested that fixed cell surface negative charges can be screened by
raising extracellular divalent cations with the result that activation
curves for ion channels are shifted to positive voltages (25, 26).
The aim of this report was to examine the role of glycosylation in
affecting the activation properties of the rat brain Kv1.1 (RBK1 or
RCK1) channel. Kv1.1 is a delayed rectifier K+ channel that
was originally cloned from rodent brain cDNA libraries (27, 28, 29, 30) and
is a heavily sialidated protein (20). We investigated the possible role
of sialic acids by comparing the functional properties of Kv1.1 in
control and glycosylation-deficient CHO1
cell lines (Lec mutants). Evidence is presented that suggests reducing
the sialic acid content of Kv1.1 channels has significant functional
effects on its activation parameters but not on its cell surface
expression.
CHO cell lines were
obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD) and
maintained in CHO cell lines were plated
on glass coverslips and examined for the presence of voltage-gated
K+ currents 2-3 days later using standard whole cell
recording methods and voltage pulse protocols (32). Cells were viewed
using Nomarski optics (500× magnification) at room temperature
(21 °C) in our standard recoding solution containing (in
mM) NaCl, 145.0; KCl, 5.3; MgSO4, 1.0;
CaCl2, 5.4; glucose, 5.6; HEPES, 5.0 (pH 7.3). For the high
Ca2+ recording solution, an osmotically equivalent amount
of NaCl was decreased, whereas in the low Ca2+ solution
NaCl was increased. Patch pipettes were pulled from glass hematocrit
capillary tubing (VWR) and had tip resistances of 1.5-2.0 M Whole-cell membrane currents were recorded from CHO cells with an
Axopatch-1 patch clamp (Axon Instruments, Burlingame, CA) and digitized
using a Cheshire data interface (Indec Systems, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA)
and a computer equipped with an LSI-11/73 processsor (Digital Equipment
Corp., Maynard, MA). Original data acquisition and analysis programs
were written by Dr. V. Dionne and modified when required. After
establishing the whole-cell configuration, cells were held at To assay for voltage-gated currents, a family of test depolarizations
were applied from Analysis of variance was used to
assess statistical differences of a control value compared with other
test values in a group. A p < 0.05 was considered
significant.
Antibodies to a synthetic peptide to
the N terminus of Kv1.1 (amino acids 5-27) were raised in rabbits and
characterized for their specificity as described (34, 35). CHO cell
lines were grown until confluent on 100-mm plates. Total membranes were
prepared by homogenizing the cells in 50 mM K+
phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) containing EDTA (2 mM), pepstatin
A (1 mm), 1,10-phenanthroline (1 mM), phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride (0.2 mM), and iodoacetamide (1 mM).
The homogenate was centrifuged at 35,000 × g for
1 h to pellet membranes and stored at Kv1.1 cDNA was stably transfected into two control cell
lines (K1, parental of Pro5 and Pro5, parental of Lec mutants) and two
mutant lines (Lec8 and Lec2) (36). The Lec mutants were selected for
their ability to grow in lectin supplemented medium, and they have been
shown to produce truncated cell surface glycoproteins (37): Lec8
(glycoproteins with reduced galactose content, due to decreased
UDP-galactose transport into the Golgi (38)) and Lec2 (glycoproteins
with reduced sialic acid content, due to decreased CMP-sialic acid
transport into the Golgi (39)). Evidence suggests that galactose
addition is required before terminal sialic acids are attached to
N- or O-linked glycoproteins in the trans Golgi
(23). The general glyco-structures on proteins are:
N-linked,
AsparagineGlcNAc2-Mannose3-GlcNAc2-Galactose3-Sialic
acid3; O-linked,
Serine/Threonine-GalNAc1-3-Galactose1-3-Sialic
acids1-3. Therefore both Lec mutants would be predicted to
produce truncated Kv1.1 glycoproteins having a reduced sialic acid
content but not necessarily a complete reduction.
Whole-cell recording techniques were used to characterize
the K+ currents expressed by the CHO cells (the standard
recording solution contained 5.4 mM Ca2+).
Kv1.1 transfected CHO cells exhibited large outward currents of 1-3 nA
that showed a voltage dependence of activation and noninactivating
characteristics of delayed rectifier K+ channels (Fig.
1). Also consistent with the expression of
K+ channels, the outward currents in control transfected
CHO cells were inhibited by classic K+ channel blockers
such as tetraethylammonium (IC50 = 0.5 mM,
n = 5) and dendrotoxin (IC50 = 5 nM, n = 5). In contrast with the large
K+ currents recorded from transfected cells, identical
depolarizations of nontransfected Pro5 and Lec mutants produced either
no net currents (70% of cells) or small inward, and more rarely
outward, currents that did not exceed 80 pA (30% of cells)
(n = 10-15 for each cell line). Nontransfected K1
cells expressed similar peak currents but in 80% of cells.
In order to examine the voltage dependence for activating Kv1.1
channels expressed in CHO cells, fractional conductance was plotted as
a function of the step depolarization and fit to the Boltzmann
equation. The voltage at half-maximal activation
(V1/2) and the slope for the voltage dependence of
activation (a) were compared among the cell lines.
Significant positive shifts in V1/2 values were
recorded for Kv1.1 channels expressed in both Lec mutants (shifted 16 mV for Lec8 and 8 mV for Lec2) compared with Pro5 (Fig.
2 and Table I). The slope of the voltage
dependence of activation was slightly decreased in Lec8 but not
significantly different in Lec2 versus control (Fig. 2 and
Table I). Kv1.1 activation kinetics were slower for both Lec mutants as
expected from a positive shift in their V1/2 values
(Fig. 1). Indeed, the activation rise time (10-90% value) (30) was
significantly slower in both Lec mutants compared with control (Table
I). Furthermore these activation rise time differences do not take into
account the additional longer delay prior to onset of the current
following the voltage pulses that is seen in both Lec mutants,
particularly Lec8 (Fig. 1). All activation parameters obtained for Lec8
were significantly different compared with Lec2 (at least
p < 0.05). In contrast to the changes in gating
parameters, the maximal Kv1.1 whole-cell conductance relative to cell
membrane capacitance did not differ significantly in the Lec mutants
versus control (Table I). These findings indicate that the
cell surface density of Kv1.1 channels in the Lec mutants was similar
to that of control if the single channel conductance is similar but
that a greater depolarization was required for activation.
Electrophysiological parameters of Kv1.1/CHO cells
Treatment of control cells
with exosialidase, which cleaves sialic acids sequentially, would be
predicted to shift V1/2 to positive voltages if
sialic acids are responsible for the shift in the Lec mutants. Indeed,
sialidase treatment (5 units/ml) had a significant effect on Pro5 and
shifted V1/2 about 7 mV compared with control (Fig.
3), whereas there was no significant change in slope
factor ( Fig. 3. Effects of sialidase treatment on the V1/2 of Kv1.1 in Pro5 and Lec8 cells. Pro5 cells were incubated in sialidase for 2 h at 37 °C; boiled 2, 2, or 5 units/ml. V1/2 values were obtained as described in Table I. Each value is a mean ± S.E. The asterisks indicate significant differences from untreated Pro5 controls using the analysis of variance test (*, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.005). The number of cells analyzed are listed by the error bars. Effects of Varying Extracellular Calcium It has been long
known that changing extracellular ionized Ca2+ from its
physiological value of 1.5 mM in mammals results in altered
electrical excitability of nerve and muscle tissue (3, 25). In high
Ca2+ the V1/2 for Na+ and
K+ channels is shifted to positive voltages, whereas in low
Ca2+ it is shifted to negative values. This effect of
Ca2+ has been proposed to be due to its interaction with
fixed negative charges on ion channels and/or glycophospholipids on the
cell surface by direct binding and/or screening (25). To examine
whether sialic acids are the Ca2+-sensitive negative
charges on the cell surface, we determined the V1/2
of CHO/Kv1.1 cells in high (25 mM) and low (1 mM) Ca2+ to compare with the values recorded in
the control solution (5.4 mM). If sialic acids are the
negative charges that Ca2+ is affecting, then Pro5 would be
more sensitive to Ca2+ changes than the Lec mutants.
Indeed, the V1/2 for Pro5 was shifted about 15 mV in
the positive direction in high Ca2+ and 7 mV in the
negative direction in low Ca2+ compared with the control
solution (Fig. 4A). In contrast, this same
treatment had no effect on the V1/2 of Lec8. However
high Ca2+ did shift the V1/2 about 7 mV
in Lec2 versus control, whereas low Ca2+ had no
significant effect. Furthermore, in low Ca2+ (which is
physiological) there were more dramatic positive shifts in
V1/2 for both Lec mutants (23 mV for Lec8 and 14 mV
for Lec2) versus control Pro5, whereas in high
Ca2+ this parameter was similar in all cell lines (Fig.
4A). In high Ca2+ the slope factor (Fig.
4B) and activation rise time (Fig. 4C) parameters
were similar for all cell lines. These results suggest that the
titratable Ca2+-sensitive negative charges on Pro5 are
sialic acids, presumably on the Kv1.1 channel, and these charges are
absent from Lec8 and reduced in Lec2.
Fig. 4. Effects of varying extracellular Ca2+ on activation parameters of Kv1.1/CHO cells. A, V1/2 parameter. B, (a) slope factor. C, rise time paramter. Values were obtained as described in Table I. Each value is a mean ± S.E. The asterisks indicate significant differences from values recorded in 5.4 mM Ca2+ of the same cell line using the analysis of variance test (*, p < 0.05; **,p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.005). The number of cells analyzed are listed by the error bars. Immunoblot Analysis of Kv1.1 Protein Expressed in CHO Cell Lines Total CHO membrane proteins were run on a SDS gel for
immunoblotting with Kv1.1 antibodies (34, 35) to determine the pattern
of glycosylation of Kv1.1 membrane proteins. The major immunoreactive
membrane protein from all cell lines had a molecular weight similar to
the Kv1.1 core polypeptide (calculated 56,000) (Fig. 5).
This finding suggests that in the steady state the bulk of Kv1.1
proteins are in internal RER membranes and only slightly processed.
Bands of higher Mr were also detected indicating
that the protein was glycosylated. Pro5 exhibited a diffuse Kv1.1 band
that had a Mr of about 80,000 (Fig. 5,
lane 2), which was similar to that of the rat brain Kv1.1
protein (Fig. 5, lane 1). A fraction of this Pro5 80,000 band presumably represents plasma membrane proteins that were processed
to a similar extent as in brain. The diffuse Kv1.1 banding pattern is
due to different degrees of glycosylation of the core protein. Both Lec
mutants expressed truncated Kv1.1 glycoproteins with a
Mr that was less than the diffuse Pro5 80,000 band (Fig. 5, compare lane 2 with lanes 3,
4, and 5), which is consistent with a
glycosylation deficiency. A fraction of the band that had the highest
Mr presumably represents plasma membrane
proteins. Furthermore the most processed Lec2 Kv1.1 protein
(70,000-75,000) exhibited a diffuse banding pattern and appears to be
glycosylated to a greater extent than Lec8 Kv1.1 proteins
(59,000-62,000) (Fig. 5, compare lane 4 with lanes
3 and 5). This apparent additional glycosylation is
probably due to sialic acid addition, because they are the terminal
residues added to both N- and O-linked
glycoproteins. Thus the Lec2 strain that we have, although a sialic
acid deficient mutant, appears to have an incomplete block of sialic
acid addition. The Pro5 80,000 protein has a Mr
that is 5,000-10,000 and 18,000 larger than the most processed Lec2
and Lec8 proteins, respectively. Nontransfected cell lines did not show
Kv1.1 antibody reactivity (Fig. 5, lanes 6-9).
Preincubating the Kv1.1 antibody with its specific peptide blocked the
immunoreactivity, demonstrating the specificity of the reaction (data
not shown).
Fig. 5. Kv1.1 protein is differentially glycosylated in different CHO cells. Kv1.1 immunoblot analysis of membrane proteins from rat brain, Kv1.1/CHO cells, and nontransfected CHO cells. A, total membranes proteins were run on a denaturing 8% polyacrylamide gel and electrotransferred to nitrocellulose for immunoblot analysis with Kv1.1 rabbit polyclonal antibodies and ECL detection methods. Lane 1, rat brain membrane proteins (10 µg); lanes 2-5, Kv1.1 transfected Pro5, Lec8, Lec2, and Lec8, respectively (membranes from two different Kv1.1/Lec8 clones were run on the gel); lanes 6-9, nontransfected Pro5, Lec8, Lec2, and Lec8, respectively. About 100 µg of membrane protein was run on all CHO cell lanes. The molecular mass protein standards are shown on the left of the blot in kDa as well as the Mr of the Kv1.1 unprocessed core protein. B, same immunoblot with longer exposure time.
Sialidation of Kv1.1 Channels Modifies Function Kv1.1 channels expressed in Lec mutants and sialidase-treated control cells exhibited significant differences in voltage-dependent gating parameters versus control. Lec8 had the most dramatic Kv1.1 gating changes, whereas Lec2 and sialidase-treated control had an intermediate effect. An explanation for these findings may be that there was an incomplete block of sialic acid addition to the Lec2 Kv1.1 proteins, as suggested by immunoblot analysis and Ca2+ sensitivity of its V1/2 parameter and incomplete desialidation of Kv1.1 channels in control cells. The effects of desialidation and high Ca2+ on Kv1.1 gating parameters will be discussed in the context of two theories advanced to explain the effects of Ca2+ on voltage-gated channels. However, we are not suggesting that desialidation and high Ca2+ have identical effects on channel gating. Frankenhaeuser and Hodgkin (25) proposed the surface potential (SP) theory, and Armstrong (40) proposed a hypothesis that may be called the gating stabilization theory (3). The SP theory proposes that Ca2+ ions bind to and/or screen negative charges on ion channels and/or glycophospholipids and thereby alter the local electric field detected by the channel's voltage sensor. In contrast, the gating stabilization theory proposes that Ca2+ ions bind to negatively charged amino acids on the voltage sensor, thereby stabilizing the channel's closed state and are then removed with depolarization resulting in the open state. Ca2+ has also been proposed to be necessary for the normal function of K+ channels (41, 42). It is generally considered that ion channel voltage-sensing regions experience a uniform transmembrane electric field. Thus the SP theory predicts that all voltage-dependent gating processes should be changed equally by increasing Ca2+. Studies have presented data in support of (43) and against (40, 44, 45) this view (for reviews see Refs. 3 and 46). However, if different channel gating determinants do not reside in a uniform electric field or if fixed negative surface charges are not homogeneously distributed in relation to voltage-sensing regions, then differential changes in gating parameters could result. Overall, the data may be more consistent with Ca2+ having two distinct actions: altering surface charge and affecting channel gating directly. Positive V1/2 shifts of up to 23 mV and slower activation kinetics recorded in the Lec mutants and sialidase-treated control suggest that sialic acids either stabilize the channel's open state or destabilize its closed state. The most likely explanation for these results is that decreasing Kv1.1 sialic acid content reduces the negative surface potential, thereby reducing the negative potential, which is felt by its voltage sensor. A greater depolarization is now required to activate the channel. Although this is consistent with the SP theory, a purely electrostatic ``screening'' mechanism is probably an oversimplification. The sites and positions of sialic acids on Kv1.1 are unknown, but the SP theory would predict that functional ones are closest to the membrane surface. The SP theory requires that titrating surface charge be equivalent to changing the holding potential of the voltage clamp. In physiological Ca2+ Lec2 and sialidase-treated control are in accord with this requirement, as evidenced by their G/V curves that have similar slope factors as control, whereas Lec8 clearly is not, as evidenced by its decreased slope. One interpretation of this is that partial reduction of sialic acids on the channel is consistent with the SP theory, whereas complete reduction results in further changes in gating parameters that are not. A combination of the SP and gating stabilization theory may explain the effect of complete reduction of sialic acids on gating parameters. In order to assess any effects of the decrease in glycosylation on the voltage sensor, direct gating current measurements or lower limit estimates of gating valence via limiting slopes from ionic currents should be obtained. The Ca2+-sensitive negative charges on Kv1.1 channels appear to be sialic acids because high Ca2+ had no effect on the V1/2 of Lec8. Although these data may be consistent with the SP theory, the effect of varying Ca2+ and Zn2+ on ion channel function appears to be more complex than the SP theory would imply (44, 45). In the present study, high Ca2+ did not change V1/2 or activation kinetics in Lec8, but it did increase the slope of the G/V curve to a value similar to that of control. This finding is more consistent with Ca2+ interacting directly with K+ channel amino acids to modify gating (44, 45). However, if Ca2+ blocks (or permeates (47)) K+ channels more at negative than positive voltages, it would contribute to increasing the G/V slope as it is raised. An alternative explanation for changes in Kv1.1 channel gating may involve conformational changes that shift negatively charged amino acids to positions that no longer influence the voltage sensor. The cell surface negative charge on the Lec mutants and sialidase-treated control would also be predicted to be decreased. Any of these charges close to the Kv1.1 voltage sensor could conceivably affect activation parameters. In this regard, it has been suggested that the effect of Ca2+ on the V1/2 of sodium channels in planar lipid bilayers is due to both its interaction with negative charges on the channel molecule (70% of effect) and net negatively charged phospholipids (30% of effect) (48). Further studies are required to differentiate between effects of sialic acids on the channel versus on associated glycolipids. A recent report has suggested that some cell lines, including CHO
cells, express The functional expression levels of Kv1.1 in control and Lec mutants were similar, which suggests that galactose and sialic acid addition in the Golgi are not required for expression on the cell surface. The Kv1.1 channel has only one extracellular N-glycosylation site yet the glycoprotein has about 24 kDa of carbohydrate/monomer, of which 12-18 kDa is sialic acid (20). It is unlikely that 24 kDa of carbohydrate is attached to this one site, and the channel may have O-linked carbohydrates. Other Studies on the Effects of Glycosylation on K+ Channel FunctionN-Glycosylation did not modify Shaker H4 K channel gating parameters when expressed in oocytes (51), although these channels synthesized in a cell-free rough microsomal system and analyzed in planar lipid bilayers required larger than expected depolarizations for activation (52). Functional expression of Kv1.1 channels was inhibited by tunicamycin, a N-glycosylation inhibitor (34, 53). This inhibition was probably due to an indirect effect because the Kv1.1 N-glycosylation mutant was expressed (53). This study concluded that N-glycosylation did not modify channel function, such as altering V1/2 or activation kinetics, when the control and mutant Kv1.1 gating properties were compared. Other Studies on the Effects of Sialidase Treatment on Ion Channel FunctionAdditional studies have suggested that sialidase treatment of cells in culture modifies ion channel function or toxin sensitivity in the case of T- and L-type calcium channels (54, 55) and sodium channels (56), whereas other studies recorded no significant effects on sodium channels (57), Ca2+-activated K+ channels (58), inward rectifier K+ channels (59), or delayed rectifier K+ channels (60). In the last study it was estimated that 12% of surface sialic acid was resistant to cleavage. If sialic acids play a role in the function of most voltage-gated ion channels, which is unknown, then the negative results above may imply that sialidase-resistant sialic acids are functionally important. Role of Sialidation in Ion Channel FunctionNeurons express their unique complement of ion channels either as homo- and/or heteromultimers giving them their particular properties of electrical excitability. Functional diversity may be further increased by modulation of channel gating by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation (61, 62). Additional functional diversity may result from neurons expressing ion channels with varying degrees of sialidation, which may fine tune their excitability. This task could be accomplished through differential expression of a variety of glycotransferases as reported in tissues (63) and cell lines (64). An advantage to modifying gating via sialidation would be a finer tuning control of voltage dependence, shifting V1/2 to different voltages but retaining other channel core properties. This notion has relevance because mutagenesis studies suggest that amino acid changes in S4 can result in drastic and unpredictable gating alterations. Shifts in channel V1/2 of 5-10 mV would be expected to have physiological consequences in a neuron's response to incoming signals and its output response (3). Although heavy sialidation appears to be a common posttranslational modification to Na+ channels (16, 17, 18, 19), which also modifies its function (24, 65), it is unknown whether the numerous K+ channel subtypes or other ion channels that have been functionally characterized are also sialidated proteins. The present study suggests that the sialidation state of the Kv1.1 channel plays an important role in determining its particular properties of voltage-dependent gating. Thus the amino acid sequence as well as the degree of sialidation should be considered in any explanation of the functional differences among K+ channels. * This research was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants NS29633 (to W. B. T.) and NS24417 (to J. F. M.). The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Physiology
and Biophysics, One Gustave Levy Place, Mount Sinai School of Medicine,
New York, NY 10029. Tel.: 212-241-3010; Fax: 212-860-3369; E-mail:
thornhill{at}msvax.mssm.edu.
1 The abbreviations used are: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; SP, surface-potential. We thank Drs. North and Adelman for the rat brain cDNA to Kv1.1 (Christie et al. (29)) and Drs. W. Gilly, J. Heierhorst, D. E. Logothetis, E. Recio-Pinto, and B. Rudy for a critical reading of the manuscript and helpful discussions.
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||