![]()
|
|
||||||||
(Received for publication, November 14, 1995, and in revised form, April 8, 1996)
From the Center for Extracellular Matrix Biology, Institute of
Biosciences and Technology, Texas A&M University,
Houston, Texas 77030
The vaccinia virus/T7 bacteriophage expression
system was used to express human decorin in HT-1080 cells by
co-infection with vTF7-3, encoding T7 RNA polymerase, and vDCN1,
encoding the decorin core protein fused to a polyhistidine-insulin
signal sequence fusion-protein cassette. Overexpression using the
vaccinia virus/T7 phage system resulted in secretion of approximately
30 mg of decorin/109 cells per 24 h which enabled
purification and separation of multiple glycoforms under native
conditions. Cells were cultured in the presence of
[35S]methionine or a mixture of
[3H]glucosamine and [35S]sulfate, and
recombinant glycoprotein purified by metal affinity chromatography
which resolved the secreted decorin into two classes, a proteoglycan
form and a core protein form. About 25% of the recombinant protein was
secreted into the culture medium as core protein devoid of
glycosaminoglycan chains. The decorin core protein was resolved into
two forms (~49 and ~53 kDa) that differed in the extent of
N-linked oligosaccharide substitution (2 and 3 N-linked oligosaccharides, respectively). Deglycosylation
of the recombinant proteoglycans and core proteins resulted in a single
band migrating with an apparent molecular mass ~ 43 kDa when analyzed
by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Far-UV circular dichroism
spectra of native decorin proteoglycan showed a minima at 218 nm,
consistent with a secondary structure that is predominantly Decorin, a small chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan is a ubiquitous
component of the extracellular matrix of many tissues (1, 2). The
decorin mRNA encodes a prepro-core protein of 360 amino acids (3,
4). This core protein can be divided into several distinct structural
domains comprising: 1) a short signal sequence of 16 amino acids that
targets the protein to the rough endoplasmic reticulum; 2) a propeptide
of 14 amino acids of unknown function; 3) the glycosaminoglycan
(GAG)1 acceptor region with the
chondroitin/dermatan sulfate chain substituted at the Ser-4 residue of
the mature core protein (5); 4) a hypervariable cysteine globular
domain; 5) a leucine-rich domain comprising a major portion of the core
protein and containing three N-linked oligosaccharide
attachment sites; and 6) a carboxyl-terminal globular domain. The
mature decorin molecule that is recovered from tissues lack the
propeptide domain. Decorin belongs to a growing family of proteoglycans
with one or more GAG chains, that are characterized by core proteins of
about 40 kDa containing 8-12 homologous leucine-rich repeats (LRR) of
20-29 residues with leucines in conserved positions (3, 6). Similar
LRR motifs are found in other proteoglycans like biglycan (7),
fibromodulin (8), and lumican (9), and numerous other apparently
unrelated molecules such as the porcine ribonuclease inhibitor (10,
11). In the ribonuclease inhibitor, each LRR contains an alternating
Most of the biological functions ascribed to decorin are believed to
relate to complex formation with other molecules via the GAG or core
protein domains. Thus decorin has been demonstrated in vitro
to bind to several proteins including fibronectin (15), transforming
growth factor- In the present study we have successfully utilized the vaccinia
virus/T7 phage expression system to produce chemical amounts of
differentially glycosylated forms of decorin that encompass the range
of species described to date for tissue extracts and cell culture
systems. We have purified the decorin glycoforms under native
conditions and analyzed their glycosylation patterns. Preliminary
investigation of the secondary structure of the decorin and biglycan
extracted under denaturing and non-denaturing conditions is presented.
The affinity of these recombinant native forms of decorin for
collagenous extracellular matrix molecules is likely to better
represent interactions that may occur in vivo.
All experimental procedures are as described in the accompanying
paper (34), except for the following.
First-strand cDNA synthesis was done (Gene Amp
kit, Perkin Elmer) with specific downstream oligonucleotide primers
(0.5 µg/reaction) and 1-2 µg of RNA in a final reaction volume of
20 µl. cDNA extension was at 42 °C for 60 min, and the
reaction terminated by incubation at 100 °C for 5 min. PCR cDNA
amplification was done using the entire 20-µl first-strand cDNA
reaction as a template in a final reaction volume of 100 µl
containing upstream oligonucleotide primer (0.5 µg) and 2.5 units of
Pfu DNA polymerase.
Human skin
fibroblast RNA was used to generate a first-strand cDNA encoding
the mature form of the decorin core protein (i.e. amino
acids 31-359). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using the
downstream primer, DCN-M2
5 A 41-mer synthetic peptide spanning
amino acid residues 180-220 of human decorin was coupled to KLH
(Immunogen Conjugation kit, Pierce), and used to generate a rabbit
polyclonal antiserum (under contract with Cocalico Inc., Reamstown,
PA). The antiserum, PR2 demonstrated specificity toward decorin and in
separate experiments (not shown) exhibited immunoreactivity similar to
the widely used LF-30 antiserum (kindly provided by Dr. Larry Fisher,
National Institutes of Health). Five µl of the cell-free translation
reaction mixture was preadsorbed with normal rabbit serum and protein
A-Sepharose for 2 h at 4 °C. The supernatant was incubated with
PR2 coupled to protein A-Sepharose and bound antigen released from the
beads by incubation with SDS-PAGE sample buffer (see below).
The decorin expression plasmid, pDCN1 was
used to generate a recombinant vaccinia virus by homologous
recombination. This recombinant virus containing the
polyhistidine-decorin fusion protein sequence under control of the T7
promoter, vDCN1, was propagated, amplified, and titered by standard
methods (25).
Proteins were resolved on a 7.5%
SDS-PAGE gel, and subsequently transferred to a nitrocellulose
membrane. The membrane was blocked with 1% BSA, washed, and then
incubated with PR2 antisera (1:3500 dilution) followed by goat
anti-rabbit alkaline phosphatase conjugate (1:2000 dilution). The
membrane was developed with 0.3 mg/ml nitro blue tetrazolium and 0.15 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate in 100 mM
Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2,
pH 9.5.
A Jasco J720
spectropolarimeter was calibrated with a 0.1% (w/v)
10-d-camphor sulfonic acid solution and CD spectra measured
at room temperature in a 2-mm path-length quartz cell. Purified protein
was exchanged into 10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH
8.0, and protein concentration calculated by theoretical molar
extinction coefficient (26). Estimation of secondary structure content
was done according to Sreerama and Woody (27).
Decorin proteoglycan and core
protein were radiolabeled (28) and separated from free
[125I]iodine by chromatography on PD-10 (Pharmacia)
columns equilibrated with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.9 mM CaCl2
(PBS+), 0.1% BSA. Specific activity of the
[125I]iodine-labeled preparations were ~3 × 107 cpm/µg. Immulon 1 wells were incubated overnight with
2 µg of C1q (20 µg/ml) or 50 µl of 1% BSA. Wells were washed
with PBS+ and blocked with 1% BSA for 1 h at
37 °C. Non-radiolabeled competitor (see text) was added at 0-100
µg/ml for 1 h and [125I]decorin (5 × 104 cpm/well) was added and allowed to incubate for 3 h at room temperature. Wells were washed 3 times and the amount of
bound radiolabel measured. All determinations were done in triplicate
(mean ± S.D.).
A recombinant expression
vector, pDCN1 (Fig. 1a), was developed for
optimum production and secretion of decorin in eukaryotic cells using
the vaccinia virus/bacteriophage T7 polymerase expression system,
essentially as described in the accompanying paper (34). The vector,
pDCN1, contains a cDNA that encodes the mature decorin core protein
and does not contain sequence encoding the endogenous signal sequence
or the putative propeptide domain. pDCN1 was transcribed and translated
in vitro in the presence of Trans35S-label (Fig.
1b). The radiolabeled products migrated as a single
predominant band with an apparent molecular mass ~ 46 kDa
(lane 1) that was selectively immunoprecipitated with PR2
(lane 2) confirming the presence of the epitope in the
translation product. Transcription/translation and immunoprecipitation
of other fusion proteins did not cross-react with PR2 (data not
shown).
The vector
pDCN1 was used to generate a new recombinant vaccinia virus by
homologous recombination utilizing thymidine kinase sequences that
flank the decorin fusion protein construct shown in Fig. 1a.
HT-1080 cells do not secrete endogenous decorin (data not shown) and
were co-infected with vDCN1 and vTF7-3. Cultures were incubated in
medium containing Trans35S-label, the medium harvested and
recombinant decorin purified by nickel chelating chromatography (Fig.
2a). Several peaks were observed, including a
large peak of radioactivity in the unbound fraction which did not
contain immunoreactive decorin. The material eluted from the column by
stepwise increases in imidazole concentration was monitored by analysis
of selected fractions (Fig. 2a, asterisks) by SDS-PAGE (Fig.
2b). A proteoglycan form of decorin migrating as a
polydisperse smear centered at ~100 kDa eluted between fractions 30 and 40 (Fig. 2b, fractions 30, 33, 36, and 40),
corresponding to an imidazole concentration of 60-80 mM
(Fig. 2a). A mixed population containing decorin
proteoglycan (median molecular mass ~ 90 kDa) and decorin core
protein (molecular mass ~ 50 kDa) eluted at 80 mM
(lane 46), with the majority of the radioactivity associated
with the core protein form. Higher concentrations of imidazole, between
80 and 100 mM, were required to elute the remainder of the
bound radioactivity (Fig. 2a, fractions 45-55) which was
predominantly decorin core protein (Fig. 2b, fractions 46, 49, and 52). Identity of both the proteoglycan and core protein forms
as decorin was confirmed by Western blot with PR2 antiserum (data not
shown). The recombinant decorin was purified to greater than 90% by a
single passage over the nickel column based on the absence of any other
radiolabeled proteins co-purifying (Fig. 2b) and on the
absence of any additional Coomassie staining bands (see below).
A sample containing both decorin proteoglycan and decorin core protein
radiolabeled biosynthetically with Trans35S-label and
purified by nickel affinity chromatography was incubated with factor Xa
protease and reapplied to a nickel column. Decorin that was not
incubated with the factor Xa protease bound to the resin and was eluted
with 200 mM imidazole, whereas after factor Xa digestion
about 80% of the decorin (both proteoglycan and core protein) no
longer bound to the resin and eluted in the unbound fraction (data not
shown). The reason for incomplete cleavage is not clear, but may relate
to enzyme inactivation. There was no apparent preferential cleavage of
the proteoglycan versus the core protein forms indicating
that the level of glycosylation of the fusion protein did not influence
access of the protease to the cleavage site.
About 75% of the total recombinant protein purified from the culture
supernatant was the proteoglycan form of decorin based on incorporation
of 35S-radiolabel (Cys and Met) before and after
chondrotinase ABC digestion. In addition to the apparent high level of
purity attained by the nickel column, we also noted that there was some
resolution into subpopulations: the early eluting decorin proteoglycan
was of larger molecular size compared to the later eluting proteoglycan
(Fig. 2b, fractions 30 and 46, square brackets).
The resolution of two subpopulations of proteoglycan was clearer when
the proteins were labeled with [35S]sulfate and
[3H]glucosamine (see below). Although separation into
subpopulations was more evident using a step elution procedure, it was
still apparent during gradient elution procedures (data not shown). The
core protein form of decorin also migrated on SDS-PAGE as a doublet,
molecular mass ~ 53 and ~49 kDa, with the larger core protein
eluting slightly ahead of the smaller form on the nickel column (Fig.
2b, fractions 46-52).
Recombinant decorin was isolated from a large number of co-infected
HT-1080 cells (2.5 × 109) by a preparative scale
nickel column. The concentration of purified samples were estimated by
theoretical molar extinction coefficient and analyzed by 7.5% SDS-PAGE
stained with Coomassie Blue (Fig. 3). Decorin
proteoglycan was predominantly eluted in the 60 mM
imidazole fraction, and 10, 5, and 1 µg were applied to the gel (Fig.
3, lanes 1-3, respectively). Decorin core protein was
enriched in the 80 mM imidazole elution and an estimated 5 µg was loaded (Fig. 3, lane 4) which migrated as a
doublet, with the larger form (molecular mass ~ 53 kDa) more
abundant. No other contaminating protein bands were visualized on the
gel, indicating purity of the sample. Based on these data, we are able
to estimate that expression and purification of recombinant decorin
under native conditions (i.e. in the absence of chaotropic
solvents or detergents) yields about 10 mg of proteoglycan and 3.3 mg
of core protein/109 cells per 24 h. Recombinant
decorin proteoglycan was also isolated and purified under denaturing
conditions from HT-1080 culture supernatant in the presence of the
chaotropic solvent 4 M GdnHCl and the detergent 0.5%
Triton X-100. The use of this solvent throughout the extraction and
purification protocol increased the final yield of proteoglycan
2-3-fold compared with the yield under native conditions. The
significant increase in yield of recombinant protein in the presence of
detergent was most likely a consequence of the hydrophobicity of native
material.2
Samples of
Trans35S-labeled decorin proteoglycan and core protein were
subjected to differential digestion with glycosidases to assess the
nature of the carbohydrate substitutions. Undigested sample (Fig.
4, lane 1) shows the presence of the
proteoglycan smear and a doublet core protein. Following digestion with
chondroitinase ABC (Fig. 4, lane 2), the proteoglycan smear
is no longer visible and all the radiolabel is coincident with the core
protein doublet. Separate experiments showed that the proteoglycan was
equally susceptible to chondroitinase ACII digestion indicating that
the proteoglycan contained predominantly chondroitin sulfate.
Chondroitinase ABC-treated sample was further incubated with
N-glycosidase F (Fig. 4, lane 3) which resulted
in the doublet core protein reducing to a single band with an apparent
molecular mass ~ 43 kDa. Chondroitinase ABC digestion of
proteoglycan generated a doublet core protein, indicating that both
core protein forms contain GAG (data not shown). The core protein
doublet appears to reflect differential N-glycosylation of
the decorin core protein, most likely representing 3 and 2 N-linked oligosaccharides based on the shift in migration
position (~10 and ~6 kDa, respectively). There was no evidence for
secretion of unglycosylated decorin, or a proteoglycan form without
N-linked oligosaccharides.
HT-1080 cells co-infected with
vDCN1 and vTF7-3 were incubated in the presence of
[35S]sulfate and [3H]glucosamine.
Radiolabeled macromolecules were applied to a nickel column, bound
material eluted using the protocol described for Fig. 2a,
and radioactivity of collected fractions monitored. Two distinct peaks
of radioactivity were eluted (data not shown), one at 60 mM
imidazole and the second at 70-80 mM imidazole, and were
distinguished by the differential ratio of
35S:3H which reflected the composition of the
two pools. The early eluting peak (pool 1) and the later eluting peak
(pool 2) were collected and aliquots subjected to gel filtration
chromatography on Superose 6. Pool 1 eluted predominantly as a single
broad peak (Fig. 5a) centered at
Kd 0.40 (mass ~ 94 kDa, compared to globular
protein standards), with the 35S and 3H
co-incident. Pool 2 resolved into a single broad
35S-labeled peak centered at Kd 0.45 (mass ~ 80 kDa); and two distinct 3H-labeled peaks,
one coincident with the 35S label, and a second, sharp peak
at Kd 0.60 (mass ~ 50 kDa) which consisted
exclusively of 3H label (Fig. 5b). Based on the
predicted composition of the two pools (see Fig. 2b), pool 1 represents decorin proteoglycan alone and pool 2 comprises a mixture of
proteoglycan and core protein. The core protein from pool 2 is
radiolabeled via 3H incorporation into N-linked
oligosaccharides. The broad, high molecular weight peaks in both pools
represent proteoglycan containing 35S- and
3H-labeled chondroitin sulfate chains. This was confirmed
by chondroitinase ABC digestion of pool 1 and pool 2 and elution on
Superose 6 (Fig. 5, c and d). More than 95% of
the 35S label and 80% of the 3H label in pool
1 shifted to the Vt of the Superose 6 column after
chondrotinase ABC digestion, leaving a small, sharp peak containing
3H label at Kd 0.60 (Fig. 5c,
asterisk). Chondroitinase ABC digestion of pool 2 shifted more
than 95% of the 35S and 60% of the 3H label
to the Vt, leaving a single, sharp peak containing
primarily 3H label at Kd 0.60 (Fig.
5d). After chondroitinase ABC digestion, the Superose 6 resolves a core protein pool of molecular mass ~ 50 kDa,
consistent with the core protein size determined on SDS-PAGE (~49 and
~53 kDa).
The molecular size difference between the decorin proteoglycan in pools
1 and 2 is illustrated by their different migration positions on
SDS-PAGE (Fig. 6a). This size difference is
largely due to differences in chondroitin sulfate chain size as
determined from Superose 6 chromatography after alkaline hydrolysis.
However, anomolous migration of proteoglycans on SDS-PAGE may be
influenced by microheterogeneity in disaccharide composition which
could affect the total charge density of the molecule. Disaccharide
analysis of the chondroitin sulfate chains (summarized in Fig.
6b) show ratios of
Recombinant decorin proteoglycan purified
under native conditions was analyzed by CD spectroscopy. The far-UV
spectra of the native proteoglycan showed greater than 70% secondary
structure which was predominantly
Both the proteoglycan and core protein exhibit a high degree of
hydrophobicity when purified under native conditions,2 with
this being more pronounced for the core protein preparation. This
hydrophobicity may be a consequence of the secondary structure, since
similar behavior was not apparent for GdnHCl-treated material. The
presence of a polyanionic chondroitin sulfate chain on the decorin
proteoglycan may play a role in maintaining a stable secondary
structure in solution.
The
binding of 35S-labeled decorin proteoglycan and core
proteins to collagen types I, II, III, V, VI, C1q or BSA was examined,
and showed an identical pattern to that of biglycan (34). The binding
of decorin to the fibrillar collagens was overshadowed by the much
greater binding observed with C1q. Interaction with C1q appears to be
mediated by the core protein of decorin, with binding up to 18-fold
over the BSA control compared to 9-fold binding of intact proteoglycan.
Krumdieck et al. (21) have shown that decorin proteoglycan
and chondroitinase ABC-generated core protein from bovine articular
cartilage also bind C1q.
The binding of 125I-labeled proteoglycan and core protein
to C1q was subjected to competition by the addition of unlabeled
decorin proteoglycan and core protein (Fig. 8a,
open and closed circles, respectively). Both decorin
proteoglycan and decorin core protein inhibited binding of
125I-labeled decorin to C1q. The IC50
(concentration of competitor required for half-maximal inhibition) for
the core protein was ~28 µg/ml (0.62 µM) and for
intact proteoglycan the IC50 value was ~18 µg/ml (0.2 µM; Fig. 8a). Saturability of the decorin-C1q
interaction was investigated by adding increasing amounts of
radiolabeled decorin (specific activity 200,000 cpm/µg) to wells
coated with C1q or 1% BSA. The inset in Fig. 8,
b and c, demonstrates that specific binding of
decorin proteoglycan and core to C1q reaches a plateau at 0.6 µg of
proteoglycan and 0.4 µg of core protein added. Assuming a single
binding site on the C1q molecule, Scatchard analysis (31) yielded a
dissociation constant for the decorin-C1q interaction of 50 and 26 nM for the binding of the recombinant decorin proteoglycan
and core proteins, respectively.
In this study, differentially glycosylated forms of decorin have
been overexpressed in a eukaryotic cell line with a connective tissue
origin (HT-1080). These decorin glycoforms were separated from other
secreted molecules to greater than 95% purity, and further partially
resolved by metal chelating affinity chromatography into two distinct
populations: proteoglycan forms and core protein forms. The
proteoglycan population was further partially resolved into two species
distinguished by different sized chondroitin sulfate chains with
distinct disaccharide composition; the core protein subpopulation was
also represented by two distinct forms, distinguished by the extent of
N-linked oligosaccharide substitution. The core protein
preparations generated by chondroitinase ABC digestion of the
proteoglycan pool comprised both the 2 and 3 N-linked
oligosaccharide forms; we cannot exclude the possibility that the
different sized GAG chains are on different core proteins
(i.e. the 2 and 3 N-linked oligosaccharide forms,
respectively), however, this would seem unlikely given a similar
bi-modal population of GAG chains was observed for recombinant biglycan
(34) where there is no evidence for expression of two core
proteins.
The two non-proteoglycan forms of recombinant decorin had an apparent
mobility of ~49 and ~53 kDa on SDS-PAGE. Differential
N-glycosylation of decorin synthesized by human skin
fibroblasts in vitro has been demonstrated previously (32),
whereby chondroitinase ABC-digested decorin migrated as a doublet core
protein preparation which further reduced to a single band when
synthesized in the presence of tunicamycin. Although these
investigators were able to induce N-glycan-free decorin
proteoglycan synthesis through exogenous addition of tunicamycin, we
saw no evidence for expression of similarly N-glycan-free
decorin core protein expression, nor is there any evidence that this is
a biosynthetic product in vivo. In fact, it is likely that
core protein devoid of both GAG and N-linked
oligosaccharides may be insoluble, as evidenced by the difficulties
associated with bacterial expression of these molecules (33).
The different glycoforms of decorin expressed in this system are
similar to the variety of decorin glycanated and non-glycanated species
already identified in tissues. The proteoglycan form of the recombinant
decorin is characteristic of material extracted from tissues in terms
of chondroitin sulfate chain length and pattern of sulfation, as well
as differential N-glycosylation. The recombinant decorin
secreted devoid of GAG chains is likely a product of overexpression of
core protein exceeding the capacity of one or more
glycosyltransferases. Purification and quantitation of the recombinant
decorin indicates that the HT-1080 cells secreted up to 30-40 mg of
decorin/109 cells per 24 h, about 75% as a
proteoglycan form and the remainder as core glycoprotein. Under native
conditions we experienced significant losses of material, but are
nevertheless able to purify chemical amounts that are correctly folded
and biologically active.
Circular dichroism spectra and secondary structure prediction clearly
demonstrate that about 70% of the native recombinant intact decorin
assumes a secondary structure with a high proportion of Decorin bound very effectively to the complement component C1q, showing
an 18-fold increase in binding with core protein compared to BSA, and a
9-fold increase in binding with the proteoglycan form. Since the
presence of a GAG chain appears to have attenuated the extent of
binding it is likely that this interaction is mediated via the core
protein, and the GAG chain may interfere with the ability of C1q to
access the core protein domain. C1q is a subcomponent of the C1
complex, the first component of the classical pathway of complement
activation (21, 22). The C1q molecule consists of two domains, a
collagen-like triple helical domain at the N terminus and a globular
configuration at the C terminus and circulates in the plasma as a
Ca2+-dependent complex with C1r and C1s (22).
Although the biological significance of C1q-decorin interaction is not
known, decorin may modulate complement-mediated inflammation at sites
where extracellular matrices containing decorin are exposed to
complement components (21). The C1q-decorin interaction was
competitively inhibited by both core protein and proteoglycan
preparations, however, an intact proteoglycan (i.e.
substituted with a GAG chain) is required for inhibition of the
complement cascade (21). Although both native and denatured decorin
bind to C1q, it remains to be determined if the two forms interact via
the same domain or whether the interaction with denatured decorin is
simply nonspecific binding. The specificity and affinities of native
decorin glycoforms for collagen-like molecules is the subject of
further study.
This study, and the accompanying paper (34), have demonstrated the high
level expression and purification under native conditions of the small
interstitial proteoglycans, decorin and biglycan. These glycoconjugates
possess a high degree of secondary structure not apparent in similar
molecules extracted from hard tissues by standard techniques, in
addition to maintaining biological activity in several binding assays.
Furthermore, several glycoforms have been isolated that are similar to
subpopulations present in a variety of tissues in vivo.
These recombinant decorin proteoglycan and core protein forms isolated
in chemical amounts will allow further study on the biological role and
molecular interactions of this class of LRR-containing molecules.
We thank Drs. Karen House-Pompeo and Steve
LaBrenz for help with the CD analysis, and Dr. Gurusiddappa for making
the synthetic peptide. Bovine decorin extracted from articular
cartilage was kindly provided by Dr. Larry Rosenberg (Montefiore
Medical Center, New York). We also thank Dr. Magnus Höök
for critical review of the manuscript.
Volume 271, Number 32,
Issue of August 9, 1996
pp. 19578-19584
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
PURIFICATION AND STRUCTURE*

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
-sheet.
Circular dichroism spectra of bovine decorin extracted from articular
cartilage and recombinant decorin similarly treated revealed a minima
of 205 nm indicating a loss of secondary structure. The affinity of
decorin proteoglycan and core protein for collagen-like molecules was
demonstrated, with the complement component C1q exhibiting the most
striking affinity for decorin, although adherence to collagen types I
and V was also observed. The extensive secondary structure maintained
in the purified recombinant protein is likely to be important for the
biological function of decorin.
sheet-
helix structural unit, with the short
-strand and the
-helix approximately parallel to each other (12). The leucine-rich
sequences of some of these proteins have been postulated to mediate
protein-protein (13) and protein-membrane (14) interactions. The LRR
repeats in the extracellular matrix proteoglycans are flanked by
disulfide loops located at conserved positions near the NH2
and COOH termini and thus may comprise a specialized subgroup within
the LRR superfamily (3, 6). Although biglycan, fibromodulin, lumican,
and decorin are similar in their general structural features they
differ markedly in their gene regulation, pattern of expression, and
functional interactions.
(16), and membrane receptors required for its
endocytosis (17). In addition, decorin binds to certain types of
fibrillar collagens including type I (18), type II (19), and type VI
(20) and retards fibrillogenesis (19). Decorin also interacts with the
collagen-like molecule C1q, a subcomponent of the C1 complex, the first
component of the classical pathway of complement activation (21, 22).
However, without exception these studies have utilized decorin
extracted from tissues under harsh denaturing conditions which are
likely to alter the secondary structure of this molecule. In fact, we
demonstrate in this study that decorin purified under native conditions
has an extensive secondary structure that is severely and irreversibly
disrupted when treated by standard extraction techniques (23, 24).
Binding of denatured decorin with other matrix molecules may not
reflect biologically relevant interactions.
-GCCAGGTTATAAAAATGAGGGG
T
CTTGAGA-3
(base pairs 1163-1194). A cDNA encoding the mature decorin core
protein was then PCR amplified using the upstream primer, DCN-M1
5
-GGCTTATTTGACTGCAT
TAGAAGATGAGGC-3
(base
pairs 148-179). An SphI site was created by site-specific
changes in both oligonucleotide primers (bold). A shuttle vector, pAH1
containing a factor Xa protease cleavage sequence was digested with
SphI. The decorin cDNA was cloned into pAH1 at the
SphI site to yield pAH1-DCN. The pAH1-DCN plasmid was used
as a template for PCR amplification using the following synthetic
oligonucleotide primers: upstream primer, P3
5
-CGGGATCC
GCCATCGAGGGTAGGGGCATG-3
; and
downstream primer, P4
5
-CGGAAACTATAAGTAATTCTCTGCAG
GGA-3
. An
EcoRI site at the 5
end (primer 3) and a SacII
site at the 3
end (primer 4) (bold) were created. These sites were
used to clone the decorin cDNA into a polyhistidine vaccinia
expression vector, pBGN4 (34). pBGN4 was digested with EcoRI
and SacII to create sites for insertion of the decorin
cDNA fragment. The resulting polyhistidine fusion vector, pDCN1 was
sequenced to ensure no rearrangements occurred during PCR
reactions.
Human Decorin Expression Vector
Fig. 1.
Fusion protein expression vector and in
vitro transcription and translation of decorin core
protein. a, the expression construct pDCN1 comprising an
insulin signal sequence (INS), six consecutive histidine
residues (His × 6), a factor Xa protease recognition
sequence (Xa), and sequence encoding the mature decorin core
protein under the control of the bacteriophage T7 promoter
(T7). b, pDCN1 was transcribed in
vitro with T7 RNA polymerase and the resultant RNA translated with
rabbit reticulocyte lysate. Total in vitro translation
product (lane 1) and immunoprecipitated translation product
with PR2 decorin-specific antibody (lane 2) were resolved by
7.5% SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography.
Fig. 2.
Purification of recombinant decorin.
HT-1080 cells were co-infected with vDCN1 and vTF7-3 at a multiplicity
of infection of 10 plaque-forming units/cell. Cells were incubated for
24 h in serum-free medium containing Trans35S-label
and the medium was harvested. a, nickel chelating
chromatography. Fractions eluted from the nickel column were monitored
for radioactivity (
), and imidazole concentration (
).
b, SDS-PAGE. Aliquots from selected fractions (*,
panel a) were concentrated and resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE
and visualized by fluorography. Square bracket indicates the
position of the intact decorin proteoglycan, double lines
indicate the doublet core protein bands.
Fig. 3.
Synthesis and purification of chemical
amounts of recombinant decorin. HT-1080 cells (~2.5 × 109 cells) were co-infected with vDCN1 and vTF7-3 and the
conditioned media harvested at 30 h and applied to a nickel
column. Aliquots from the 60 mM imidazole elution
(lanes 1-3) and 80 mM imidazole elution
(lane 4) were resolved on a 7.5% SDS-PAGE and stained with
Coomassie Blue R-250. Ten µg (lane 1), 5 µg (lane
2), and 1 µg (lane 3) of decorin proteoglycan
(square bracket) and 5 µg (lane 4) of decorin
core protein (indicated by the double lines) were loaded
onto the gel.
Fig. 4.
Glycosylation of recombinant decorin. A
sample of Trans35S-labeled decorin was subjected to
differential glycosidase digestion. Lane 1, untreated;
lane 2, chondroitinase ABC digestion; lane 3,
sequential chondroitinase ABC digestion and N-glycosidase F
digestion. Products of reactions were resolved by 7.5% SDS-PAGE and
visualized by fluorography. Square bracket corresponds to
the proteoglycan smear, the double lines indicate reduction
of the proteoglycan smear to a core protein doublet, and the
asterisk indicates a single migrating band representing
deglycosylated decorin core protein.
Fig. 5.
Compositional analysis of recombinant decorin
proteoglycan by Superose 6 gel filtration. Recombinant decorin
proteoglycan was radiolabeled with [35S]sulfate and
[3H]glucosamine. Recombinant decorin proteoglycan was
purified by nickel chelating affinity chromatography, as described for
Fig. 2, and two peaks of radioactivity were resolved (profile not
shown): one eluting at 60 mM imidazole (pool 1) and the
second eluting at 70-80 mM imidazole (pool 2). Aliquots of
each pool were subjected to Superose 6 gel filtration chromatography.
Panels a, pool 1, untreated; b, pool 2, untreated; c, pool 1, incubated with chondroitinase ABC;
d, pool 2, incubated with chondroitinase ABC.
di-0S:
di-4S:
di-6S in the larger
chondroitin sulfate chains (pool 1) of 2.7:1.0:10.6, markedly different
for that observed for the shorter chains (pool 2) of 2.0:1.0:3.7. These
two subpopulations partially resolve by nickel chelating chromatography
and this may relate to both the size and different disaccharide
composition of the chondroitin sulfate chains.
Fig. 6.
a, SDS-PAGE of recombinant decorin
proteoglycan glycoforms. Proteoglycan pools 1 (lane 1) and 2 (lane 2) described in the legend to Fig. 5 were resolved by
7.5% SDS-PAGE and visualized by fluorography. Molecular weight markers
are indicated. b, disaccharide analysis of chondroitin
sulfate chains. The decorin proteoglycan pools visualized in
panel a were subjected to disaccharide analysis of
chondroitinase ABC digestion products. The distribution of
3H radioactivity is expressed as a percentage of total
radioactivity co-eluting with disaccharide standards.
-sheet as indicated by a sharp
minima at 218 nm (Fig. 7a, closed circles).
Analysis of the CD spectra based on computer modeling (27) predicted
the native proteoglycan to comprise 54%
-sheet, 14%
-turn, 12%
-helix, and 20% random coil. Recombinant decorin proteoglycan was
also isolated and purified under denaturing conditions from HT-1080
culture supernatant in the presence of the chaotropic solvent 4 M GdnHCl and 0.5% Triton X-100. After exchange back into
physiological solvent, the CD spectra obtained for this material (Fig.
7a, open circles) revealed a sharp minima around 205 nm
indicating an unordered conformation with no detectable secondary
structure. Decorin extracted from bovine articular cartilage,
representative of material utilized in numerous binding studies (29,
30), was also devoid of any secondary structure (Fig. 7a, open
squares), and was similar to the spectra obtained for native
decorin after thermal denaturation. The CD spectra for similarly
produced recombinant biglycan (34) was identical to that for
recombinant decorin; and exposure to denaturants resulted in disruption
of the secondary structure. Consistent with these observations of
significant secondary structure in the recombinant decorin
proteoglycan, the PR2 antiserum selectively immunoprecipitated
guanidine HCl-extracted decorin core protein (Fig. 7b, lane
1) but not the native recombinant decorin (Fig. 7b, lane
2), however, both denatured and native preparations of recombinant
decorin were recognized by Western blot analysis (Fig. 7b, lanes
3 and 4). This is consistent with the epitope being
inaccessible in the native conformation (i.e. conditions for
immunoprecipitation), but available upon unfolding of the molecule
(i.e. SDS treatment and transfer to nitrocellulose
membrane).
Fig. 7.
a, circular dichroism analysis of
decorin. Circular dichroism far UV spectra of recombinant decorin
proteoglycan (
), GdnHCl-treated recombinant decorin proteoglycan
(
), and decorin proteoglycan extracted from articular cartilage
(
). b, immunoprecipitation (Ippt) and Western
blot (WB) analysis. Recombinant decorin was purified in the
presence (lanes 1 and 3) and absence (lanes
2 and 4) of 4 M GdnHCl. Samples were either
immunoprecipitated (lanes 1 and 2) or probed by
Western blot (lanes 3 and 4) using the antibody
PR2.
Fig. 8.
Decorin-C1q interaction. a,
125I-labeled decorin proteoglycan (
) and
125I-labeled core protein (
) binding to C1q-coated
microtiter wells was inhibited with increasing amounts of unlabeled
recombinant intact proteoglycan (
) and core protein (
). All
determinations were done in triplicate (mean ± S.D.).
b and c, Scatchard analysis. Microtiter wells
coated with 2 µg of C1q or 1% BSA were incubated with increasing
concentrations of 125I-labeled decorin proteoglycan or
125I-labeled core protein (specific activity 200,000 cpm/µg). The amount of bound and free ligand was quantitated for
decorin proteoglycan (
) and core protein (
). The
insets show that binding was saturable.
-sheet
content. This is not surprising given that about 70% of the core
protein is comprised of the LRR domain which is predicted to assume a
complex structure in solution. However, both recombinant decorin
subjected to denaturing conditions and decorin extracted from cartilage
by standard techniques (29, 30) demonstrated a loss of secondary
structure in their CD spectra. This strongly argues that techniques
commonly employed for isolation of decorin and biglycan from tissues
(23, 24, 29) have a permanent effect on the conformation of the core
protein. These changes in secondary structure may have implications on
the interpretation of data reported by others related to interactions
between decorin and biglycan with other extracellular matrix molecules.
A recent study (23) reported that decorin extracted from cartilage with
GdnHCl was not an effective competitor of native decorin binding to
type I collagen. Given many previous reports of GdnHCl-extracted
decorin interacting with type I collagen in a variety of assays, it is
possible that there are both secondary structure-dependent
and -independent interactions. It is likely that interactions requiring
correctly folded decorin are important in vivo so it is
important to investigate these interactions using native
preparations.
*
This work was supported by a grant from the National
Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National
Institutes of Health Grant RO1 AR42826. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: 713-677-7575;
Fax: 713-677-7576; E-mail: dmcquill{at}ibt.tamu.edu.
1
The abbreviations used are: GAG,
glycosaminoglycan; PAGE, polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; GdnHCl,
guanidine hydrochloride; CD, circular dichroism; LRR, leucine-rich
repeat; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; BSA, bovine serum
albumin.
2
Separate experiments investigating the
hydrophobicity of native preparations of recombinant decorin were done
by elution on Q-Sepharose anion exchange resin in the presence of a
variety of solvents. Solvents containing 10 M formamide and
0.5% Triton X-100 allowed for greater than 90% recovery of both
proteoglycan and core protein forms, however, the absence of either a
denaturing solvent (formamide) or detergent (Triton X-100) reduced
total recovery to about 60%. Chromatography in physiological solvents
(50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.5) resulted in 60% loss of the
proteoglycan and almost 80% loss of core protein. Most of the lost
material could be recovered by extraction of the resin with 4 M GdnHCl, 0.5% Triton X-100.
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Goldoni, D. G. Seidler, J. Heath, M. Fassan, R. Baffa, M. L. Thakur, R. T. Owens, D. J. McQuillan, and R. V. Iozzo An Antimetastatic Role for Decorin in Breast Cancer Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2008; 173(3): 844 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Dugan, V. W.-C. Yang, D. J. McQuillan, and M. Hook Decorin Modulates Fibrin Assembly and Structure J. Biol. Chem., December 15, 2006; 281(50): 38208 - 38216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. G. Seidler, S. Goldoni, C. Agnew, C. Cardi, M. L. Thakur, R. T. Owens, D. J. McQuillan, and R. V. Iozzo Decorin Protein Core Inhibits in Vivo Cancer Growth and Metabolism by Hindering Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Function and Triggering Apoptosis via Caspase-3 Activation J. Biol. Chem., September 8, 2006; 281(36): 26408 - 26418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Mercado, A. R. Amenta, H. Hagiwara, M. S. Rafii, B. E. Lechner, R. T. Owens, D. J. McQuillan, S. C. Froehner, and J. R. Fallon Biglycan regulates the expression and sarcolemmal localization of dystrobrevin, syntrophin, and nNOS FASEB J, August 1, 2006; 20(10): 1724 - 1726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N.-S. Seo, A. M. Hocking, M. Hook, and D. J. McQuillan Decorin Core Protein Secretion Is Regulated by N-Linked Oligosaccharide and Glycosaminoglycan Additions J. Biol. Chem., December 30, 2005; 280(52): 42774 - 42784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. L. Groeneveld, M. Oroszlan, R. T. Owens, M. C. Faber-Krol, A. C. Bakker, G. J. Arlaud, D. J. McQuillan, U. Kishore, M. R. Daha, and A. Roos Interactions of the Extracellular Matrix Proteoglycans Decorin and Biglycan with C1q and Collectins J. Immunol., October 1, 2005; 175(7): 4715 - 4723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-X. Zhu, S. Goldoni, G. Bix, R. T. Owens, D. J. McQuillan, C. C. Reed, and R. V. Iozzo Decorin Evokes Protracted Internalization and Degradation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor via Caveolar Endocytosis J. Biol. Chem., September 16, 2005; 280(37): 32468 - 32479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goldoni, R. T. Owens, D. J. McQuillan, Z. Shriver, R. Sasisekharan, D. E. Birk, S. Campbell, and R. V. Iozzo Biologically Active Decorin Is a Monomer in Solution J. Biol. Chem., February 20, 2004; 279(8): 6606 - 6612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Le Goff, V. J. Hindson, T. A. Jowitt, P. G. Scott, and P. N. Bishop Characterization of Opticin and Evidence of Stable Dimerization in Solution J. Biol. Chem., November 14, 2003; 278(46): 45280 - 45287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Nadesalingam, A. L. Bernal, A. W. Dodds, A. C. Willis, D. J. Mahoney, A. J. Day, K. B. M. Reid, and N. Palaniyar Identification and Characterization of a Novel Interaction between Pulmonary Surfactant Protein D and Decorin J. Biol. Chem., July 3, 2003; 278(28): 25678 - 25687. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Dugan, V. W-C. Yang, D. J. McQuillan, and M. Hook Decorin Binds Fibrinogen in a Zn2+-dependent Interaction J. Biol. Chem., April 11, 2003; 278(16): 13655 - 13662. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Di Lullo, S. M. Sweeney, J. Korkko, L. Ala-Kokko, and J. D. San Antonio Mapping the Ligand-binding Sites and Disease-associated Mutations on the Most Abundant Protein in the Human, Type I Collagen J. Biol. Chem., February 1, 2002; 277(6): 4223 - 4231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Fischer, M. G. Kinsella, B. Levkau, A. W. Clowes, and T. N. Wight Retroviral Overexpression of Decorin Differentially Affects the Response of Arterial Smooth Muscle Cells to Growth Factors Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., May 1, 2001; 21(5): 777 - 784. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Kinsella, J. W. Fischer, D. P. Mason, and T. N. Wight Retrovirally Mediated Expression of Decorin by Macrovascular Endothelial Cells. EFFECTS ON CELLULAR MIGRATION AND FIBRONECTIN FIBRILLOGENESIS IN VITRO J. Biol. Chem., April 28, 2000; 275(18): 13924 - 13932. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Brown, B. P. Guo, P. O'Neal, and M. Hook Adherence of Borrelia burgdorferi. IDENTIFICATION OF CRITICAL LYSINE RESIDUES IN DbpA REQUIRED FOR DECORIN BINDING J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 1999; 274(37): 26272 - 26278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. V. Iozzo The Biology of the Small Leucine-rich Proteoglycans. FUNCTIONAL NETWORK OF INTERACTIVE PROTEINS J. Biol. Chem., July 2, 1999; 274(27): 18843 - 18846. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. W-C Yang, S. R. LaBrenz, L. C. Rosenberg, D. McQuillan, and M. Hook Decorin Is a Zn2+ Metalloprotein J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 1999; 274(18): 12454 - 12460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Krishnan, A. M. Hocking, J. M. Scholtz, C. N. Pace, K. K. Holik, and D. J. McQuillan Distinct Secondary Structures of the Leucine-rich Repeat Proteoglycans Decorin and Biglycan. GLYCOSYLATION-DEPENDENT CONFORMATIONAL STABILITY J. Biol. Chem., April 16, 1999; 274(16): 10945 - 10950. |