|
Volume 271, Number 34,
Issue of August 23, 1996
pp. 20450-20457
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
DNA End Joining by the Klenow Fragment of DNA Polymerase I*
(Received for publication, September 20, 1995, and in revised form, June 3, 1996)
Jeff S.
King
§,
Cecilia F.
Fairley
and
William F.
Morgan
¶
From the Laboratory of Radiobiology and Environmental
Health and the ¶ Department of Radiation Oncology, University
of California, San Francisco, California 94143
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
DNA end joining is a type of illegitimate
recombination characterized by the joining of two DNA ends that lack
homology. Using oligonucleotides as substrate, we found that an
exonuclease-free derivative of the Klenow fragment of
Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I can mediate DNA end
joining in vitro. DNA sequence analysis of product DNA
indicated that overlap products were formed between direct repeat
sequences at the termini of the oligonucleotides. Formation of
recombinant products was dependent on the strandedness of the substrate
DNA, and the rate of product formation was dependent on the size of the
potential overlap. With one to three complementary bases available for
pairing at the 3 termini, there was an absolute requirement that one
of the oligonucleotides be double-stranded, whereas with four
complementary bases, products were also formed in reactions with
single-stranded oligonucleotides. When noncomplementary nucleotides
were added to the terminus of one of the oligonucleotides, product
formation was delayed but not blocked. These data indicate that a DNA
polymerase can mediate DNA double strand break rejoining in the absence
of other proteins.
INTRODUCTION
DNA-dependent DNA polymerases provide the pivotal
function of DNA synthesis in the cellular processes of DNA replication,
recombination, and repair. Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I
has roles in all three of these processes (1). Polymerase I is the most
extensively studied DNA polymerase. It has distinct regions for binding
single- and double-stranded DNA as well as domains for dNTP binding,
polymerization, and 3 -5 exonuclease (2). There are significant amino
acid sequence similarities between various DNA polymerases in the
critical polymerization and 3 -5 exonuclease domains, suggesting a
general structure for DNA polymerases (3). In fact, mammalian DNA
polymerase can complement E. coli polymerase I defects in
some replication and repair assays (4, 5).
DNA double strand breaks can be produced in cells as a consequence of
normal cellular processes or after exposure of cells to DNA-damaging
agents. It is essential for the integrity of the genome that double
strand breaks be repaired quickly. DNA double strand breaks can be
repaired by homologous recombination, which can restore the original
sequence, or by illegitimate recombination, in which two ends are
joined, typically resulting in a change of sequence (reviewed for
mammalian cells in Ref. 6). Failure to rejoin a double strand break can
result in the loss of DNA sequences, and misrepair of a double strand
break can lead to the addition or deletion of nucleotides, resulting in
mutation. This repair process does not ensure that the ends joined came
from the same molecule and can thus lead to formation of gross
chromosomal rearrangements (e.g. translocations, insertions,
inversions, and exchange-type aberrations) (7, 8). Chromosomal
rearrangements are seen in cancer cells (9, 10) and can lead to genomic
instability (11, 12, 13) and cell death (14, 15). This indiscriminate end
joining mechanism is a primary pathway for the repair of double strand
breaks in mammalian cells (16, 17, 18).
Several model systems have been developed to study the rejoining of
restriction enzyme-produced DNA double strand breaks with
noncomplementary ends (16, 19, 20). Three types of end joining products
have been described in these systems: inserts (16), ``fill-in'' (21),
and ``overlap'' (20). Inserts have one or more additional nucleotides
in the junction between the joined ends and occur in approximately 10%
of the junctions formed in mammalian calls (16, 22). Fill-in products
are those in which the protruding single strands produced by the
restriction enzymes are preserved. Overlap products are those in which
bases are deleted from the protruding single-stranded ends; typically,
there are one to six complementary bases at the junction of the two
ends. Overlap products have been observed in human cells (23), Chinese
hamster ovary cells (24), monkey cells (16, 22), Xenopus
cell extracts (20, 21), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (25, 26),
Schizosaccharomyces pombe (27), and E. coli (28).
Although these overlap products do not have extensive homology, they
typically have more complementary bases at the junction site than would
be expected for random joining, thus supporting the assertion that they
are not produced by a blunt-ended or single-stranded ligation
process.
Several DNA polymerases that either lack 3 -5 exonuclease activity or
have repressed exonuclease activity, including the Klenow fragment of
E. coli polymerase I and the Taq DNA polymerase
of Thermus aquaticus, are known to add bases to the 3
hydroxyls of blunt-ended DNA duplexes in vitro (29, 30).
Once a base has been added to a blunt end, Klenow and Taq
DNA polymerases can use a 3 protruding single strand as a template for
additional polymerization (31, 32). This demonstrates that the fill-in
products of illegitimate recombination could be the result of DNA
synthesis on a discontinuous template. The other major products of
illegitimate recombination, overlap products, result from the
complementary pairing between short, directly repeated DNA
sequences.
We investigated the DNA polymerase-mediated joining of single- and
double-stranded oligonucleotides and constructed a model based on our
findings in which both fill-in and overlap products are mediated by DNA
synthesis. The model is based on simple in vitro experiments
and has yet to be demonstrated in vivo.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Reaction Conditions
Oligonucleotides were annealed by
mixing equal molar amounts and heating to 65 °C. The mixture was
then cooled slowly to ambient temperature. The reaction conditions were
50 pmol of a top left oligonucleotide (single- or double-stranded) and
500 pmol of a bottom right oligonucleotide with 10 units of Klenow
fragment (7 pmol), 100 µM deoxynucleotide triphosphates,
25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10 mM
MgCl2 in 15-µl reactions carried out at ambient
temperature. Biotinylated oligonucleotides were purchased from the
Biomolecular Resource Center (University of California, San Francisco,
CA). All other oligonucleotides were synthesized on an Applied
Biosystems (Foster City, CA) 391 DNA synthesizer. In time course
experiments, the biotinylated oligonucleotides were 32P
end-labeled with T4 polynucleotide kinase in standard end-labeling
reactions (33). After labeling, the oligonucleotides were washed in
water and concentrated by using Microcon 3 (Amicon, Beverly, MA)
microconcentrators.
Product Analysis
XAR5 film (Kodak) was used to image the
32P end-labeled top left molecules after separation in
denaturing 8% polyacrylamide gels. To quantify product formation, we
analyzed gels on an Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager. The samples in
each lane were integrated, and the percentage of radioactivity in each
peak was determined. The percentage of product formation was defined as
the total radioactive signal (100%) minus the percentage of
radioactivity in the substrate bands. Overexposed film images of the
gels were used to detect products formed in small amounts, allowing us
to count the number of bases added to the major products. To prepare
templates for sequencing reactions, we used the biotin to separate the
top left molecules from the other oligonucleotides in identical
reactions in which the top left oligonucleotides were not
32P end-labeled, by means of Dynal Streptavidin
paramagnetic beads. The isolated molecules were then used as template
for U. S. Biochemical Corp. Sequenase 2.0 sequencing reactions
according to the manufacturer's instructions for sequencing close to
the primer. The sequencing primer was identical in sequence to the
first 17 bases of the bottom right oligonucleotides and was thus
complementary to any DNA synthesized when the bottom right
oligonucleotide was used as a template.
RESULTS
In Vitro End Joining Reactions
To assess the ability of DNA
polymerases to produce overlap products, we set up reactions using
discontinuous oligonucleotides as substrate. The reactions used in
these experiments consisted of substrate oligonucleotides, an
exonuclease-free derivative of the Klenow fragment of E.
coli polymerase I (U. S. Biochemical Corp.), deoxynucleotide
triphosphates, and a reaction buffer. Reaction products were separated
on denaturing polyacrylamide gels. Oligonucleotides are designated top
left, bottom right, or top left complement, as shown in Table
I. The substrate oligonucleotides consisted of top left
oligonucleotides annealed to complementary oligonucleotides to produce
double-stranded molecules. A bottom right oligonucleotide was then
added to the reaction mixture, followed by the addition of
deoxynucleotide triphosphates and DNA polymerase (Fig.
1). To determine the importance of the structure of the
DNA substrate, we varied the number of complementary bases (from one to
four) at the 3 termini of the top left and bottom right
oligonucleotides. In other experiments we left the top left
oligonucleotide single-stranded, and in some experiments we added
noncomplementary bases to the 3 terminus of the bottom right
oligonucleotide so that we could investigate the effect of unpaired
bases on the reaction. The top left oligonucleotides were labeled at
their 5 ends with biotin and 32P.
Fig. 1.
Schematic design of experiment. A, a top
left oligonucleotide was made double-stranded by annealing it to a
complementary oligonucleotide. B, a 10-fold excess of a bottom right
oligonucleotide was added to the reaction mixture. C, DNA polymerase
and deoxynucleotide triphosphates were added. Samples were removed at
various times and analyzed for DNA synthesis by using the top left
strand as the primer, or the reaction was terminated and the
biotinylated DNA was removed for sequence analysis.
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]
In most of the reactions, products were obtained at the size expected
if the bottom right strand was used as a template for the addition of
nucleotides to the top left strand. These data were generated for each
of the substrates shown in Fig. 2. An example of one of
these reactions is shown in the three panels of Fig. 3.
Fig. 3A shows the oligonucleotides used in the reaction and
the hypothesized alignment during formation of junctions. Fig.
3B is the image produced by exposing to film the
polyacrylamide gel used to separate reaction products. Because only the
top left oligonucleotides were end-labeled with 32P, they
were the only molecules detected by the film. The results of these time
course experiments showed that substrate DNA was converted into product
DNA over time. Fig. 3C shows the results of sequencing
reactions performed on the product DNA. Because there was less product
or it was not homogeneous, readable sequence could not be obtained for
the 1-base pair overlap (Fig. 2, ONE BP) or for the 4-base
pair overlap with one noncomplementary base (Fig. 2, FOUR BP ONE
NONCOMPLEMENTARY). Only the 32P end-labeled
oligonucleotides contained biotin; thus, we could selectively isolate
those molecules by using streptavidin-coated paramagnetic beads.
Furthermore, the primer used in the sequencing reactions was identical
to the first 17 bases of the bottom right oligonucleotide and thus
hybridized only to DNA that was produced by using the bottom right
oligonucleotide as a template. The culmination of these protocols was
that the product bands we saw when using 32P corresponded
to the same DNA that we were sequencing. Because DNA sequencing product
was readily obtained, we concluded that recombination products were
formed by using the top left oligonucleotide as a primer and the bottom
right oligonucleotide as a template. The sequences we saw supported
this conclusion and showed the exact junctions formed between the top
left oligonucleotides and the bottom right oligonucleotides.
Fig. 2.
Reactant structures and products formed.
In the left column are the substrates shown in Figs. 4 and
5. In the right column are the products detected by sequence
analysis after isolation of biotinylated DNA. We were not able to
obtain readable sequence for the 1-base pair overlap and four
noncomplementary 2e reactions, most likely because of too little
product or nonhomogeneous product.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
Fig. 3.
Reactant structures and products formed.
One guanine residue at the 3 terminus of the bottom right
oligonucleotide. A, top left 2, with complement 2a, in
reaction with bottom right 2b. B, image of denaturing gel.
C, sequencing gel.
[View Larger Version of this Image (68K GIF file)]
The first four entries in Fig. 2 show the results of reactions in which
the top left oligonucleotide was double-stranded and the top left and
bottom right oligonucleotides had one, two, three, or four
complementary nucleotides at their 3 termini. In each reaction an
18-mer was converted into 46-49-mers, depending on the substrates used
and whether a nontemplate-derived base was added to the resulting blunt
end. The size of the products formed in each case was that expected if
an overlap had formed between the 3 -terminal direct repeat sequences.
The sequencing reactions showed that overlap formation constituted the
major product formed in each case. Each experiment demonstrated that
there was a precise alignment between the direct repeat sequences and
DNA synthesis to the end of the bottom right oligonucleotides. When
there were one to three complementary bases at the 3 termini, no
recombination product was formed when the top left oligonucleotide was
single-stranded (data not shown). However, when there were four
complementary bases at the 3 termini, products were formed when both
the top left and bottom right oligonucleotides were single-stranded.
The predominant products formed between top left oligonucleotide 3 and
bottom right oligonucleotide 3 were identical whether top left
oligonucleotide 3 was single- or double-stranded (Fig. 2).
To investigate the ability of the reaction to proceed in the presence
of noncomplementary bases, we constructed bottom right oligonucleotides
that had one, two, or four mismatched residues terminal to the direct
repeat sequence formed between the top left 2 and bottom right 2a
oligonucleotides. These oligonucleotides were designated bottom right
2b, 2c, 2d, and 2e. In addition, we constructed top left complement 2b
so that annealing to top left 2 resulted in a blunt-ended molecule, and
we used this molecule in reactions with bottom right 2a. The results of
these reactions and the alignment of the top and bottom
oligonucleotides are summarized in Figs. 2, 4, and
5. The results demonstrate that unpaired bases
3 -terminal to the direct repeat sequence on the template DNA and
possibly those 5 -terminal to the complement of the primer DNA do not
prevent product formation. The predominant product was the same as that
formed when noncomplementary bases were not present (see Fig. 2,
THREE BP). A mismatched base internal to a stretch of four
complementary bases impeded but did not prevent product formation (see
Fig. 2, FOUR BP ONE NONCOMPLEMENTARY). The joining of a
blunt-ended to a single-stranded oligonucleotide with a terminal
thymidine residue resulted in synthesis across the break without
overlap formation. This is similar to what was observed in a previous
study (32) with blunt-ended substrates. It was not known if the
blunt-ended substrate 2 would join in a blunt to 3 fashion, form a
three-base pair overlap, or form a single-base pair overlap with the
terminal bases. The predominant product formed was the single-base pair
overlap.
Fig. 4.
Rate of product formation for
oligonucleotides with up to four complementary bases at the 3 termini.
Open triangle, top left 1:top left complement 1a in reaction
with bottom right 1. Inverted closed triangle, top left
1:top left complement 1b in reaction with bottom right 1. Closed
circle, top left 2:top left complement 2a in reaction with bottom
right 2a. Open square, top left 3:top left complement 3 in
reaction with bottom right 3. Open inverted triangle, top
left 3 in reaction with bottom right 3. Closed triangle, top
left 2:top left complement 2b in reaction with bottom right 2a.
[View Larger Version of this Image (17K GIF file)]
Fig. 5.
Rate of product formation for
oligonucleotides with up to four noncomplementary guanine residues at
the 3 terminus of the bottom right oligonucleotide. Open
triangle, three complementary bases at the 3 terminus and no
noncomplementary bases. Open circle, one noncomplementary
guanine residue. Closed triangle, two noncomplementary
guanine residues. Closed inverted triangle, four
noncomplementary guanine residues, 2e. Open square, four
noncomplementary GGTC residues, 2f.
[View Larger Version of this Image (15K GIF file)]
Fig. 4 shows a graph of the rate of formation of product DNA (defined
as the percentage of oligomers greater in size than the substrate DNA)
for the reactions in which the oligonucleotides had up to four
complementary bases at the 3 termini. For overlaps of one to three
base pairs, the larger the size of the overlap, the less time was
required for the formation of detectable amounts of product. This
effect saturated between three and four complementary bases, which had
equally rapid product formation. With single-stranded oligonucleotides
and four complementary bases at the 3 termini, product formation was
observed, but it was substantially delayed compared with the identical
reaction in which the top left oligonucleotide was double-stranded. The
rates of product formation for the one-base pair overlap, the two-base
pair overlap, and the blunt substrates were similar (see Fig. 4). The
predominant product formed for the blunt substrate could form by
multiple mechanisms. It may have formed by using a single thymidine to
adenine pairing of the terminal nucleotides. Alternatively, if a
nontemplate-derived adenine, the preferred base for such an addition
from Klenow fragment (30), had been added to the blunt end, there would
be two complementary bases at the 3 termini, or product formation may
have occurred by a single base pairing between a nontemplate-derived
adenine and the internal thymidine. It is important to keep in mind
when looking at Fig. 4 that because the oligonucleotides often differed
in sequence as well as in size of overlap, it is possible that
properties other than the size of the overlap affected the rate of
product formation.
Fig. 5 shows the rate of formation of product DNA for the reactions in
which there were noncomplementary guanine residues at the 3 terminus
of the bottom right oligonucleotides. In general, noncomplementary
bases inhibited product formation. The four guanine residues may be
less inhibitory than one or two, but they did allow for an additional G
to C base pairing with the 3 -terminal G of the bottom right
oligonucleotide that may have facilitated the reaction; however, this
would have resulted in greater displacement of the top left complement
oligonucleotides. Alternatively, this result may be due to G-G base
pairing (34). Rapid product formation was not observed when a bottom
right oligonucleotide without four consecutive Gs was used (Fig. 5).
These results demonstrate that a DNA polymerase can join two
oligonucleotides in the presence of unpaired bases. More specifically,
they show that noncomplementary bases 3 -terminal to the direct repeat
sequence on the template DNA do not prevent product formation, and they
may indicate that unpaired bases on the DNA complementary to the primer
also do not prevent product formation.
Model of DNA Polymerase-mediated End Joining
These results
led us to propose the following model of DNA polymerase-mediated end
joining. The initial step in the joining of DNA ends by a DNA
polymerase would be the binding of the polymerase to a region of
double-stranded DNA (Figs. 6 and 7). If
3 recessed ends are present, they would be extended to produce
blunt-ended molecules (Fig. 6A). An additional, nontemplate-derived
base could be added to the end before the reaction would proceed down
one of two pathways (Fig. 6B). The polymerase could ``bridge'' the
break, proceed to a different end by binding to a 3 protruding single
strand (Fig. 6C), and use it as a template for additional DNA synthesis
(Fig. 6D). This would produce the fill-in products observed in the
model systems. Evidence for the catalysis of this reaction in
vitro was presented by Clark (30) and King et al.
(32). Alternatively, the polymerase could align two 3 ends at
from one to several complementary bases (Fig. 7B) before
additional polymerization produced a stable intermediate (Fig.
7C). This would produce the overlap products observed in the model
systems. Unpaired bases at the template 3 terminus or on the 5 end of
the DNA complementary to the primer DNA would not prevent end joining.
However, because of the multiple means of producing identical products,
we have not conclusively shown that unpaired bases at the 5 ends of
the DNA complementary to the primer would not prevent product
formation. DNA proofreading would remove noncomplementary bases present
at 3 termini. Additions to these schemes, including fold-back,
slippage, and misalignment, could produce the plethora of DNA
rearrangements observed in illegitimate recombination processes.
Fig. 6.
Model of DNA polymerase-mediated end joining:
bridge pathway. In the bridge pathway, a DNA polymerase,
represented by the gray oval, synthesizes DNA (A)
to the end of a template to produce a blunt-ended molecule. The DNA
polymerase may add a base to the end (B) before picking up a
3 protruding single strand as a template (C) for further
DNA synthesis (D). This pathway can preserve a 3 protruding
single strand without deletion.
[View Larger Version of this Image (68K GIF file)]
Fig. 7.
Model of DNA polymerase-mediated end joining:
alignment pathway. In the alignment pathway, a DNA polymerase,
represented by the gray oval (A), juxtaposes two
3 protruding strands at short stretches of complementary DNA
(B). DNA synthesis (C) stabilizes this otherwise
transient alignment, and the result is the deletion of sequences
between short direct repeat sequences.
[View Larger Version of this Image (43K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
The results of this study indicate that an exonuclease-free
derivative of the Klenow fragment of E. coli polymerase I
can mediate illegitimate recombination between oligonucleotides
in vitro to produce overlap products between directly
repeated DNA sequences similar to those observed from mammalian cells.
This suggests that DNA polymerases can produce products identical to
those associated with the repair of double strand breaks in mammalian
cells (6, 24).
Sequence data from model systems show that 3 and 5 protruding single
strands can be joined to blunt-ended DNA with preservation of the
protruding single strand. This process uses a novel priming activity
facilitated by a putative alignment protein (21). Previous work
indicates that DNA polymerase can function as this alignment protein
and can perform this reaction in vitro (31, 32). Overlap
products from the Xenopus system exhibit mismatch correction
at the termini of 3 protruding single strands (35), which suggests the
involvement of DNA polymerase proofreading in the repair process (36).
Furthermore, junction formation is inhibited by aphidicolin and
requires all four deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates (37). Many of the
mutations induced by restriction enzyme-generated double strand breaks
at an endogenous adenine phosphoribosyltransferase gene in Chinese
hamster ovary cells appear to be polymerase-mediated errors (24) and
are similar to DNA polymerase misalignment mutations seen in in
vitro replication studies (38). Thus, it appears that DNA
polymerases are active at the 3 termini of break-rejoining events,
both in extract systems and in vivo on a mammalian
chromosome. Consequently, we would like to know which steps in the
joining of noncomplementary ends can be performed by DNA
polymerases on their own and which functions must be either
facilitated or performed by other enzymes. Our data indicate that under
specific constraints DNA polymerases can carry out alignment reactions
in vitro to produce the overlap products characteristic of
illegitimate recombination. Furthermore, noncomplementary bases
terminal to the template direct repeat sequence do not prevent overlap
formation. Therefore, in simple in vitro reactions, DNA
polymerases can produce the major products of illegitimate
recombination.
If a DNA polymerase does function as the putative alignment protein of
noncomplementary end joining (21, 32, 37), the joining of two
noncomplementary ends would not require any novel enzyme activities
other than the increased flexibility of the DNA polymerases described
(see Figs. 6 and 7) and a DNA ligase to complete repair. Nevertheless,
this does not preclude the involvement of other proteins. A specific
protein that may be involved is the Ku antigen, which may protect ends
before joining (39, 40, 41) and which also has helicase activity (42).
There may also be proteins that facilitate end joining by holding ends
in proximity to each other. Proteins involved in chromatin structure,
such as histones, would be likely candidates to play such a role.
Furthermore, proteins that may be involved in the detection and
signaling of double strand breaks, such as the 350-kDa DNA-activated
kinase (43), would be expected to be part of a mammalian DNA double
strand break repair complex. If end joining in vivo proceeds
by a mechanism similar to the one we have proposed, extension would be
likely to involve more than the intrinsic helicase of the polymerase
and to be facilitated by an additional DNA helicase, providing a role
for DNA helicases in DNA repair in addition to their established roles
in excision repair (44) and transcription-coupled repair (45, 46).
Alternatively, the 5 to 3 exonuclease associated with some DNA
polymerases may hydrolyze the other strand until the polymerase
disassociates, to allow ligation to produce closed duplex DNA.
Illegitimate recombination is the major source of genome rearrangements
in somatic cells. The products of this process can result in mutation,
gene deletion, and chromosomal rearrangements. DNA polymerases can
carry out many of the reactions that are central to this process. In
our model, short complementary stretches of DNA that are not stable are
converted by DNA synthesis into stable nicked intermediates that can be
ligated to complete repair. The data presented here indicate that a DNA
polymerase may play a central role in the rejoining of spontaneous or
induced double strand breaks to produce the major molecular product of
illegitimate recombination, the overlaps formed between direct repeat
sequences.
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by the Office of Health and
Environmental Research, U. S. Department of Energy Contract
D-AC03-76-SF01012, by National Institutes of Health National Research
Service Award 5 T32 ES07106 from the National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences, and by National Institutes of Health
Training Grant CA 09215-12. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Present address: Inst.
of General Microbiology, Baltzer-Str. 4, University of Bern, CH-3012
Bern, Switzerland. Tel.: 41-31-631-46-57; Fax: 41-31-631-46-84; E-mail:
jking{at}imb.unibe.ch.
Acknowledgments
We thank John Phillips and Angel Islas for
stimulating discussions and Mary McKenney for editing the
manuscript.
REFERENCES
-
Kornberg, A.,
Baker, T. A.
(1992)
DNA Replication
, 2nd Ed.
, W. H. Freeman
and Co., New York
-
Beese, L. S.,
Derbyshire, V.,
Steitz, T. A.
(1993)
Science
260,
352-355
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Blanco, L.,
Bernad, A.,
Blasco, M. A.,
Salas, M.
(1991)
Gene (Amst.)
100,
27-38
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sweasy, J. B.,
Loeb, L. A.
(1992)
J. Biol. Chem.
267,
1407-1410
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sweasy, J. B.,
Loeb, L. A.
(1993)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
90,
4626-4630
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Roth, D.,
Wilson, J.
(1988)
Genetic Recombination
(Kucherlapati, R.,
Smith, G. R.,
eds)
, p. 621, American
Society for Microbiology, Washington, D. C.
-
Morgan, W. F.,
Fero, M. L.,
Land, M. C.,
Winegar, R. A.
(1988)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
8,
4204-4211
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Phillips, J. W.,
Morgan, W. F.
(1992)
Radiation Research: A Twentieth-Century Perspective
(Dewey, W. C.,
Edington, M.,
Fry, R. J. M.,
Hall, E. J.,
Whitmore, G. F.,
eds)
, Vol II, p. 207, Academic Press, New York
-
Gerondakis, S.,
Cory, S.,
Adams, J. M.
(1984)
Cell
36,
973-982
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Windle, B.,
Draper, B. W.,
Yin, Y. X.,
O'Gorman, S.,
Wahl, G. M.
(1991)
Genes & Dev.
5,
160-174
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kadhim, M. A.,
MacDonald, D. A.,
Goodhead, D. T.,
Lorimore, S. A.,
Marsden, S. J.,
Wright, E. G.
(1992)
Nature
355,
738-740
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sabatier, L.,
Dutrillaux, B.,
Martin, M. B.
(1992)
Nature
357,
548
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Marder, B. A.,
Morgan, W. F.
(1993)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13,
6667-6677
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dewey, W. C.,
Miller, H. H.,
Leeper, D. B.
(1971)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
68,
667-671
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wolff, S. (1973) in Advances in Radiation Research (Duplan,
J. F., and Chapiro, A., eds) pp. 457-465, Gordon and Breach, New
York
-
Roth, D. B.,
Porter, T. N.,
Wilson, J. H.
(1985)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
5,
2599-2607
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jeggo, P. A.
(1990)
Mutat. Res.
239,
1-16
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Zdzienicka, M. Z.
(1995)
Mutat. Res.
336,
203-213
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wake, C. T.,
Gudewicz, T.,
Porter, T.,
White, A.,
Wilson, J. H.
(1984)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
4,
387-398
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pfeiffer, P.,
Vielmetter, W.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
907-924
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Thode, S.,
Schafer, A.,
Pfeiffer, P.,
Vielmetter, W.
(1990)
Cell
60,
921-928
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Roth, D. B.,
Wilson, J. H.
(1986)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
6,
4295-4304
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murnane, J. P.,
Yezzi, M. J.,
Young, B. R.
(1990)
Nucleic Acids Res.
18,
2733-2738
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Phillips, J. W.,
Morgan, W. F.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
5794-5803
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kramer, K. M.,
Brock, J. A.,
Bloom, K.,
Moore, J. K.,
Haber, J. E.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1293-1301
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mezard, C.,
Nicolas, A.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
1278-1292
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Goedecke, W.,
Pfeiffer, P.,
Vielmetter, W.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
2094-2101
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
King, J. S.,
Valcarcel, E. R.,
Rufer, J. T.,
Phillips, J. W.,
Morgan, W. F.
(1993)
Nucleic Acids Res.
21,
1055-1059
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Clark, J. M.,
Joyce, C. M.,
Beardsley, G. P.
(1987)
J. Mol. Biol.
198,
123-127
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Clark, J. M.
(1988)
Nucleic Acids Res.
16,
9677-9686
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Clark, J. M.
(1991)
Gene (Amst.)
104,
75-80
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
King, J. S.,
Fairley, C. F.,
Morgan, W. F.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
13061-13064
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fontanel, M.-L.,
Bazin, H.,
Téoule, R.
(1993)
Anal. Biochem.
214,
338-340
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Sen, D.,
Gilbert, W.
(1992)
Methods Enzymol.
211,
191-199
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Pfeiffer, P.,
Thode, S.,
Hancke, J.,
Vielmetter, W.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
888-895
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kunkel, T. A.
(1988)
Cell
53,
837-840
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lehman, C. W.,
Trautman, J. K.,
Carroll, D.
(1994)
Nucleic Acids Res.
22,
434-442
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kunkel, T. A.
(1990)
Biochemistry
29,
8003-8011
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rathmell, W. K.,
Chu, G.
(1994)
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14,
4741-4748
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rathmell, W. K.,
Chu, G.
(1994)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
91,
7623-7627
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Getts, R. C.,
Stamato, T. D.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
5981-15984
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tuteja, N.,
Tuteja, R.,
Ochem, A.,
Taneja, P.,
Huang, N. W.,
Simoncsits, A.,
Susic, S.,
Rahman, K.,
Marusic, L.,
Chen, J.,
Zhang, J.,
Wang, S.,
Pongor, S.,
Falaschi, A.
(1994)
EMBO J.
13,
4991-5001
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Anderson, C. W.
(1993)
Trends Biochem. Sci.
18,
433-437
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Naegeli, H.,
Modrich, P.,
Friedberg, E. C.
(1993)
J. Biol. Chem.
268,
10386-10392
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Selby, C. P.,
Sancar, A.
(1993)
Science
260,
53-58
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schaeffer, L.,
Roy, R.,
Humbert, S.,
Moncollin, V.,
Vermeulen, W.,
Hoeijmakers, J. H. J.,
Chambon, P.,
Egly, J.-M.
(1993)
Science
260,
58-63
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Saito, T. Minamisawa, and K. Shiba
Motif programming: a microgene-based method for creating synthetic proteins containing multiple functional motifs
Nucleic Acids Res.,
March 19, 2007;
35(6):
e38 - e38.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Odersky, I. V. Panyutin, I. G. Panyutin, C. Schunck, E. Feldmann, W. Goedecke, R. D. Neumann, G. Obe, and P. Pfeiffer
Repair of Sequence-specific 125I-induced Double-strand Breaks by Nonhomologous DNA End Joining in Mammalian Cell-free Extracts
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 29, 2002;
277(14):
11756 - 11764.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. de Vries and W. Wackernagel
Integration of foreign DNA during natural transformation of Acinetobacter sp. by homology-facilitated illegitimate recombination
PNAS,
February 19, 2002;
99(4):
2094 - 2099.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Pastwa, R. D. Neumann, and T. A. Winters
In vitro repair of complex unligatable oxidatively induced DNA double-strand breaks by human cell extracts
Nucleic Acids Res.,
August 15, 2001;
29(16):
e78 - e78.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Feldmann, V. Schmiemann, W. Goedecke, S. Reichenberger, and P. Pfeiffer
DNA double-strand break repair in cell-free extracts from Ku80-deficient cells: implications for Ku serving as an alignment factor in non-homologous DNA end joining
Nucleic Acids Res.,
July 1, 2000;
28(13):
2585 - 2596.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. Chu
Double Strand Break Repair
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 26, 1997;
272(39):
24097 - 24100.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Shiba, Y. Takahashi, and T. Noda
Creation of libraries with long ORFs by polymerization of a microgene
PNAS,
April 15, 1997;
94(8):
3805 - 3810.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|