|
Volume 271, Number 36,
Issue of September 6, 1996
pp. 21878-21885
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Functional Analysis of Shigella VirG Domains
Essential for Interaction with Vinculin and Actin-based Motility*
(Received for publication, April 30, 1996, and in revised form, June 25, 1996)
Toshihiko
Suzuki
,
Shinsuke
Saga
and
Chihiro
Sasakawa
§
From the Department of Bacteriology, Institute of Medical Science,
University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Shirokanedai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 108, Japan and the Department of Morphology, Institute for
Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, 7-1-3-8, Kamiya-cho, Kasugai, Aichi 480-03, Japan
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
Acknowledgments
REFERENCES
ABSTRACT
The VirG (IcsA) protein of Shigella
is required for recruitment of host actin filament (F-actin) by
intracellularly motile bacteria. An N-terminal 80-kDa VirG portion
( -domain) is exposed on the bacterial surface, while the following
C-terminal 37-kDa portion ( -core) is embedded in the outer membrane.
Here, we report that the surface exposed -domain of VirG possesses
two distinct functional domains; one is the N-terminal two-thirds
portion of the -domain which is required for eliciting F-actin
assembly on the bacteria in infected cells, and the other one is the
rest of the C-terminal portion of the VirG -domain, which is
essential for the asymmetric distribution of VirG on the bacterial
surface. Furthermore, we found that vinculin, an actin-binding
cytoskeletal protein, accumulates on the surface of bacteria expressing
VirG in infected cells, and that the distribution of vinculin coincided
with the distribution of VirG and assembled F-actin. The vinculin
accumulation depended on the expression of the -domain VirG portion
required for F-actin assembly, but the recruitment of vinculin on
Shigella appeared prior to the appearance of F-actin in the
infected cells. Analysis of proteins interacting with VirG using
Xenopus laevis eggs extracts revealed that vinculin was a
protein that bound to the -domain portion. This was further
confirmed using purified chicken gizzard vinculin, in that the 95-kDa
vinculin head part, but not the 30-kDa tail part, directly bound to the
-domain portion. These results suggest a possible role for vinculin
in recruitment of F-actin to the VirG moiety exposed on
Shigella in infected mammalian cells.
INTRODUCTION
The ability of Shigella to enter colonic epithelial
cells and to subsequently spread within and between the cells is a
prerequisite for causing dysentery. The capacity of the bacteria to
spread in the cytoplasm and then move into adjacent epithelial cells is
known as intra/intercellular spreading, respectively, and requires the
bacterial functions encoded by the virG (icsA)
gene (1, 2, 3).
Shigella enter into mammalian cells by inducing bacterial
directed endocytosis (4, 5, 6), lysing the surrounded endocytic vacuole,
and then multiplying within the cytoplasm, in which the bacteria
polymerize actin or/and recruit filamentous actin (F-actin) on their
surfaces. The F-actin clot then rearranges into a long tail which
remains stationary in the cytoplasm and is left behind by bacteria
moving ahead (2, 7, 8). When the spreading bacterium makes contact with
the inner surface of the host cell plasma membrane, a long membrane
protrusion with the F-actin tail behind it develops and is endocytosed
by the adjacent cell, resulting in the surrounding of the bacterium by
a double membranous vacuole (9, 10, 11). After disruption of the vacuole,
bacteria are released into the new host cell cytoplasm and multiply
again. Thus, actin-based bacterial movement is essential for continuing
intercellular spreading among colonic epithelial cells.
VirG is a surface-exposed outer membrane protein, and the sequence of
the virG gene reveals that it is a 1102-amino acid protein
with an atypical signal peptide (3, 8, 12). Subsequent studies have
indicated that the 116-kDa VirG protein consists of three distinctive
domains, the N-terminal signal sequence (amino acids 1-52), the 706 amino acids -domain (amino acids 53-758), and the 344 amino acids
C-terminal -core (amino acids 759-1102) (12). The -domain is
presented on the surface of Shigella and contains repetitive
sequences rich in Gly residues (3, 8, 12, 13, 14), while the -core is
embedded in the outer membrane, possibly forming a -barrel
structure, through which the -domain is translocated across the
outer membrane (12). Although the -domain portion is cleaved off
from the -core and released into the bacterial environment under
in vitro and in vivo conditions (8, 13, 14), it
cannot interact with the F-actin tail in infected cells (14, 15).
Nevertheless, the assembly of F-actin near the surface of intracellular
Shigella is absolutely dependent on the surface presentation
of VirG -domain and the formation of an actin tail depends on the
asymmetric distribution of VirG (8, 12, 16, 17). Recently, to
demonstrate that VirG is the sole bacteria factor needed for movement
in infected mammalian cells, experiments on actin-based movement were
carried out using Xenopus laevis eggs extracts (18, 19). In
these studies, heterologous expression was achieved by exploiting an
OmpT (OmpT is a trypsin-like outer membrane protease)
VirG-expressing strain of Escherichia coli K12, in which the
cleavage of VirG and thus, the release of the -domain into the
bacterial environment was prevented (13). This strain displayed an
asymmetric distribution of VirG on the bacterial body and was capable
of intra/intercellular movement (19). In addition, VirG was only found
on the bacterial surface required for actin-based movement.
In this context, we constructed various internal in-frame deletions of
the -domain and attempted to delineate the functional domain
required for asymmetric distribution of VirG on the bacterial surface
or for the actin-based motility of bacteria in infected cells. Our data
indicate that bacteria expressing VirG variants lacking the N-terminal
two-thirds of the -domain cannot aggregate F-actin or form an
actin-tail, while the bacteria expressing VirG variant lacking the
remaining C-terminal portion of the -domain fail to display an
asymmetric distribution of VirG on the outer surface. In this study, we
found that accumulation of vinculin, an actin-binding protein involved
in formation of focal adhesions (21), was elicited by bacteria
expressing VirG in infected cells, and that distribution coincided with
the localized accumulation of VirG and F-actin. However, the vinculin
clot appears faster than the F-actin assembly on the bacterial surface.
Subsequent in vitro studies using X.
laevis eggs extracts or vinculin from chicken gizzard indicated
that vinculin is a protein interacting with VirG, and that the purified
vinculin head part can directly bind to the -domain portion required
for the F-actin aggregation. Based on this evidence, we speculate that
vinculin plays a role in recruitment of F-actin by VirG expressed on
intracellular Shigella.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Construction of In-frame Deletion Mutants in VirG
Plasmid
pD10-1 was a derivative of pD10 (a virG clone) (3), in which
a DNA sequence between the EcoRI site and nucleotide 193 upstream from the 5 end of the virG gene on pD10 was
deleted using exonuclease III. The ScaI site on this plasmid
was then replaced with a BamHI linker and the resultant
plasmid named pD10-1. pD10-1 was subsequently used as a template for
polymerase chain reaction (PCR)1 in
construction of in-frame deletions. A DNA fragment encompassing
nucleotides from position 957 downstream from the 5 end through to
nucleotide 1239 was amplified by PCR using primers
5 -GCTCTAGACAAAATGTAGCAGGTAATGC-3 and
5 -CCCAAGCTTCCAGACTACTGATTCCAGC-3 containing XbaI and
HindIII sites in the 5 tail, respectively. The 278-bp
XbaI-HindIII segment was then replaced with the
XbaI-HindIII segment on pD10-1; the resulting
plasmid encoding a VirG variant lacking amino acids 104-319 was
designated as pD10-1virG1. A DNA fragment encompassing
nucleotides from position 303 downstream from the 5 end through to
nucleotide 956 was amplified by PCR using primers
5 -GCTCTAGAACTAAGCTACGGATT-3 and 5 -AAAAGTACTTGTTCCATCATCTTCTTTACC-3
containing XbaI and ScaI sites in the 5 tail,
respectively. The 660-bp XbaI-ScaI segment was
replaced with the XbaI-ScaI segment on pD10-1;
the resulting plasmid encoding a VirG variant lacking amino acids
320-506 was designated as pD10-1virG2. A DNA fragment
encompassing nucleotides from position 2187 downstream from the 5 end
through to nucleotide 3110 was amplified by PCR using primers
5 -AAAAGTACTACCAATAAGTGGTATC-3 and 5 -CCGGAGCTCCATTTCCAATTC-3
containing ScaI and SacI sites in the 5 tail,
respectively. The 935-bp ScaI-SacI segment was
replaced with the ScaI-SacI segment on pD10-1;
the resulting plasmid encoding a VirG variant lacking amino acids
509-729 was designated as pD10-1virG3.
A DNA fragment encompassing nucleotides from position 1524 downstream
from the 5 end through to nucleotide 2633 was amplified by PCR using
primers 5 -GCTCTAGAATTCTGGCAGATAATCTC-3 and
5 -GCTATCCTGATATCCATAAGC-3 containing XbaI and
EcoRV sites, respectively. The 1108-bp
XbaI-EcoRV segment was replaced with the
XbaI-EcoRV segment on pD10-1; the resulting
plasmid encoding a VirG variant lacking amino acids 104-506 was
designated as pD10-1virG4. All the nucleotide sequences
(~100 nucleotides) encompassing each of the deletion ends of the
pD10-1 derivatives were verified by DNA sequencing.
Preparation of Antibodies
Rabbit VirG-specific antibody
VRG-N2 was obtained by immunization of rabbit with synthesized peptides
encompassing residues 82-100 (GAGEDGMDAWYITSSNPSH) of the VirG
polypeptide (3). The glutathione S-transferase
(GST)-specific antibody was generated in a rabbit immunized with
purified GST protein using a GST gene fusion system (Pharmacia Biotech,
Uppsala, Sweden). Anti-human vinculin monoclonal antibody hVIN-1 and
anti-chicken vinculin monoclonal antibody VIN 11-5 (anti-95 kDa head
specific) were purchased from Sigma. Anti-30 kDa tail
specific monoclonal antibody 4-21 was described previously (22).
Immunofluorescence of in Vitro Grown
Bacteria
Immunolabeling of bacteria was performed as described
(23) using rabbit VRG-N2 antibody and fluorescein-isothiocyanate
(FITC)-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma).
Preparations were observed with a confocal laser-scanning microscope
MRC-1024 (Bio-Rad). The cut-off value was raised to 120 to estimate the
distribution of the highest fluorescence intensity.
Cell Culture, Infection, and Triple Fluorescence Labeling of
VirG, Vinculin, and F-actin
Human 293 fibroblasts (ATCC CRL1573)
were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 25 mM HEPES and 10% fetal calf serum. Immunofluorescence of
Shigella flexneri-infected cells was performed as described
(24). VirG expressed on the bacterial surface was labeled with rabbit
VRG-N2 antibody and Cy5-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG (Amersham,
Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). Vinculin was labeled with anti-human
vinculin monoclonal antibody hVIN-1 and FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG
(Sigma). F-actin was visualized using
rhodamin-phalloidin (Molecular Probes Inc., Eugene, OR). Accumulation
of vinculin or F-actin around the intracellular bacteria was defined as
areas where the intensity was higher than an arbitrary threshold of 80 estimated in noninfected cells.
Glutathione S-Transferase Fusion Proteins
Four
BamHI-SmaI fragments encoding VirG -domain and
its truncated polypeptides, 1 (2218 bp, encompassing the coding
region for VirG amino acid residues 53-779), 3 (1396 bp,
encompassing the coding region for VirG amino acid residues 53-506),
4 (838 bp, encompassing the coding region for VirG amino acid
residues 53-319), and 6 (183 bp, encompassing the coding region for
VirG amino acid residues 53-101), were obtained from the plasmids,
pTSG232, pTSG233, pTSG234, and pTSG236,
respectively.2 Each of the
BamHI-SmaI segments were subcloned into pGEX-2T
(Pharmacia) opened up with BamHI and SmaI, and
resulting plasmids named pGEX- 1, pGEX- 3,
pGEX- 4, and pGEX- 6, respectively. The
289-bp XbaI-HindIII segment on
pD10-1virG1 was replaced with the
XbaI-HindIII segment on pGEX- 1, and
the resultant plasmid named pGEX- 2. Each of the
GST- -domain fusion proteins had eight amino acids (LVPRGSHE)
containing thrombin cleavage site between the two polypeptides, and 14 additional amino acids (PRWSSVPREFIVTD) at the C terminus of -domain
derivative. A DNA fragment encompassing the coding region for VirG
amino acid residues 320-507 was amplified by PCR using primers,
5 -CGCGGATCCCAAAATGTAGCAGGTAATGC-3 and
5 -AAAAGTACTAACAGTAAGTTCAGCG-3 , containing BamHI and
ScaI site, respectively. The resulting 573-bp PCR fragment
digested with BamHI and ScaI was subcloned into
BamHI and SmaI sites on pGEX-2T, and the
resulting plasmid named pGEX- 5. This GST-VirG -domain
fusion derivative had six amino acids (LVPRGS) containing a thrombin
cleavage site between the two polypeptides, and four additional amino
acids (GNSS) at the C terminus of the -domain derivative. The GST
itself had 12 additional amino acids (LVPRGSPGIHRD) at the C terminus
corresponding to the thrombin cleavage site and the multicloning site.
The extent of each truncation was determined by DNA sequencing. Fusion
proteins were expressed and purified according to Smith and Johnson
(25). They were dialyzed against TEEAN (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH
7.5, 1 mM EGTA, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.02%
NaN3, 150 mM NaCl), containing 0.5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and stored at 4 °C. Protein
concentrations were determined with Bio-Rad protein assay reagent.
In Vitro Binding Assay of X. laevis Eggs Extracts with GST Fusion
Proteins
Meiotically arrested cytoplasmic extracts of
X. laevis eggs were prepared according to Theriot
et al. (26), and preincubated with glutathione-Sepharose 4B
(Pharmacia) equilibrated in XB (100 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2,
10 mM HEPES, pH 7.7, 50 mM sucrose) for 30 min
at room temperature. GST- -domain fusion proteins (20 µg)
immobilized to glutathione-Sepharose were washed in XB prior to use.
Precleared 100 µl of extracts were added to 30 µl of packed beads
and incubated for 3 h at room temperature. Beads were recovered by
centrifugation at 5,000 × g in a microtube centrifuge
and washed twice in 1 ml of XB. Bound proteins were solublized in SDS
sample buffer (2% SDS, 4% 2-mercaptoethanol, 10% glycerol, 0.1 M Tris-HCl, pH 6.8). The eluted proteins were then
subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and
immunoblotting as described before (14).
Purification of Vinculin and V8 Fragments
Chicken gizzard
vinculin was prepared according to Feramisco and Burridge (27). During
purification of the vinculin, EGTA (1 mM) was added to all
buffers to inhibit calcium-activated proteases. To prepare the 95- and
30-kDa fragments, vinculin (~1 mg/ml) was digested with
Staphylococcus aureus V8 protease attached to cross-linked
beaded agarose (Sigma) according to Johnson and Craig
(28). The 95-kDa head and 30-kDa tail fragments were purified according
to Groesch and Otto (29). Purity of the head and tail were determined
by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie Blue staining. If necessary, proteins were
concentrated by using a Centricon microconcentrator (Amicon, Danvers,
MA).
Co-precipitaion with GST- -domain Fusion Proteins on
Glutathione-Sepharose Beads
2.5 µM GST fusion
proteins were incubated for 3 h at room temperature with 0.5 µM purified vinculin, the 95-kDa head portion or 30-kDa
tail portion. Incubations (100 µl) were performed in TEEAN, 0.5 mM 2-mercaptoethanol containing 1% bovine serum albumin.
50 µl of a 50% slurry of glutathione-Sepharose in buffer was added
and incubated for 30 min with rotating inversion. Beads were washed
twice in 1 ml of buffer containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin, and
solublized in SDS sample buffer before analysis.
RESULTS
Construction of Internal In-frame Deletions of the VirG
-Domain
To delineate the VirG portion required for eliciting
aggregation of F-actin and formation of an F-actin tail from
Shigella in infected cells, we constructed internal in-frame
deletions in the -domain using pD10-1, a cloned virG
plasmid (see ``Experimental Procedures''). The resulting four
derivatives were designated pD10-1virG1 through
pD10-1virG4, lacking amino acids 104-319
(pD10-1virG1), 320-506 (pD10-1virG2), 509-729
(pD10-1virG3), and 104-506 (pD10-1virG4),
respectively (Fig. 1). The respective VirG variant
proteins produced from the plasmids were designated VirG1 through
VirG4. All of the VirG variants were expressed under the control of the
virG promoter and contained the VirG signal peptide
sequences together with the -core (Fig. 1). To see if each of the
VirG variants were expressed from these plasmids, the plasmids were
introduced into M94 (S. flexneri
virG::Tn5) (1), and the whole cell protein
extracts from each construct were analyzed by immunoblotting with
VRG-N2 antibody, which was raised against a synthetic peptide
corresponding to the region encompassing amino acids 82-100 of VirG
(3). As determined by SDS-PAGE analysis, the VirG variants were all
stably expressed, and their expected their sizes varied (VirG1, 96 kDa;
VirG2, 97 kDa; VirG3, 93 kDa; and VirG4, 76 kDa) in M94 grown in BHI
broth (data not shown).
Fig. 1.
Schematic representation of the structure of
VirG and its variants. The three contiguous boxes
represent the N-terminal signal sequence, -domain, and -core,
respectively (12). Shaded areas indicate repetitive
sequences rich in Gly residues (3). The -core is indicated by
cross-hatching. The bent lines correspond to the
parts of VirG which are absent in the protein variants, while the
numbers correspond to the positions of the amino acids in
the wild-type VirG. Distribution of VirG and its variants on bacteria
were based on the results in Fig. 2. Abilities of VirG and its variants
to recruit F-actin assembly and/or vinculin accumulation on the
intracellular bacteria were based on the results in Fig. 3. The
focus-Plaque test measures bacterial ability to spread intercellularly
(plaque = able to spread) (11). The asterisk indicates
that M94 carrying pD10-1virG3 elicited F-actin accumulation
around the bacteria but could not form an F-actin tail.
[View Larger Version of this Image (16K GIF file)]
Immunofluorescence Staining of in Vitro Grown S. flexneri Strains
Expressing Various VirG Variants
To examine whether the lack of
various -domain portions affected the VirG expression on the
bacterial surface, bacteria grown in BHI were immunostained with
FITC-labeled VRG-N2 antibody and examined by confocal laser-scanning
microscopy. As shown in Fig. 2, although individual
bacteria expressed at slightly different levels, VirG1, VirG2, and
VirG4 variants were all expressed on the bacterial surface in a
polarized manner like the VirG wild type. Semiquantitative analysis of
the distribution of the three VirG variants revealed deposition on the
bacterial surface with a high density of the protein at one pole and a
weak expression at the other pole (Fig. 2, A-C
and E). In contrast, the distribution of VirG3 was less
polarized, with a tendency to be distributed over the whole bacterial
body (Fig. 2D). The distribution patterns of these VirG
variants in infected cells such as 293 human fibroblasts (see below) or
LLC-MK2 epithelial cells (data not shown) at 20 min after infection
were essentially the same as those grown in vitro. Thus,
these results suggested that the C-terminal part of the -domain,
corresponding to VirG amino acids 509-729, was a portion of the VirG
essential for the asymmetric distribution on the bacterial surface.
Fig. 2.
Distribution of VirG variants on the surface
of S. flexneri M94 grown in BHI broth. Confocal
laser-scanning micrographs are shown using rabbit VRG-N2 antibody and
FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG. Fluorescence images were recorded
using quantitative digital processing software (Bio-Rad). Panels
A, M94 carrying pD10-1 (wild-type VirG); B, M94
carrying pD10-1virG1 (VirG1); C, M94 carrying
pD10-1virG2 (VirG2); D, M94 carrying
pD10-1virG3 (VirG3); E, M94 carrying
pD10-1virG4 (VirG4). Bar in panel A, 1 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (78K GIF file)]
The N-terminal Two-thirds Portion of the -Domain of VirG Is
Required for F-actin Assembly by Intracellular Shigella
Bacteria
expressing VirG (M94 carrying pD10-1) or the VirG variants (M94
carrying pD10-1virG1, pD10-1virG2,
pD10-1virG3, or pD10-1virG4) were infected into
293 human fibroblasts, and after 80 min of infection the fibroblasts
were immunostained and analyzed for the distribution of F-actin and
VirG by confocal microscopy. The bacteria expressing wild-type VirG or
VirG3 variant, but not the VirG1, VirG2, or VirG4 variants, were
capable of eliciting F-actin assembly in the infected cells as examined
by immunostaining with rhodamin-labeled phalloidin or Cy5-labeled
VRG-N2 antibody. However, while the bacteria expressing wild-type VirG
could form an F-actin tail (Fig. 3F), the
bacteria expressing VirG3 failed to achieve this, and rather, became
covered with F-actin (Fig. 3I). The bacteria expressing VirG
variants were unable to move from one cell to another, because when MK2
epithelial cell monolayers were infected with these bacteria, none of
them could form plaques even after 3 days incubation. These results
support the premise that the unipolar distribution of VirG is a
prerequisite for Shigella to elicit F-actin tail in infected
cells (16, 17), and suggest that the N-terminal two-thirds of the
-domain, which contains the eight Gly-rich repetitive sequences and
the following ~80 amino acids is necessary for F-actin assembly (see
Fig. 1).
Fig. 3.
Localized accumulation of VirG, vinculin, and
F-actin in 293 fibroblasts infected with M94 expressing VirG or its
variant VirG3. Cells were infected for 20 (A-C) or 80 (D-I) min with M94
carrying pD10-1 (A-F) and pD10-1virG3
(G-I). Representative triple fluorescence confocal
laser-scanning micrographs are shown using rabbit VRG-N2/Cy5-conjugated
anti-rabbit IgG to label VirG (left panels), anti-human
vinculin monoclonal antibody hVIN-1/FITC-conjugated anti-mouse IgG to
label vinculin (middle panels), and rhodamin-phalloidin to
stain F-actin (right panels). Arrowheads indicate
intracellular bacteria recruiting vinculin but not F-actin, while
arrows indicate bacteria recruiting both vinculin and
F-actin. Bar in panel A, 10 µm.
[View Larger Version of this Image (115K GIF file)]
Vinculin Accumulates at the Same Site as VirG Deposition on
Shigella in Infected Cells
A previous study indicated that
antibody to vinculin, a protein at focal adhesions interacting with
actin and the focal adhesion proteins including talin (21, 30), labeled
the full-length of protrusions generated by moving S. flexneri in an infected cell as well as the bacteria at the
protrusion tips (9). To investigate the role of vinculin in
Shigella-induced F-actin assembly, 293 fibroblasts infected
with bacteria expressing wild-type VirG (M94 carrying pD10-1) were
stained after 20, 40, 60, and 80 min of infection with Cy5-labeled
VRG-N2, FITC-labeled anti-human vinculin monoclonal antibody, or
rhodamin-labeled phalloidin, and examined for the distributions of
VirG, vinculin, and F-actin on the bacteria by confocal microscopy.
After 20 min of infection, bacteria expressing VirG accumulated
vinculin at the same sites as VirG deposition on the bacterium (Fig. 3,
A and B). Approximately half (43 ± 7%,
n = 119) of the vinculin-positive bacteria did not have
a detectable F-actin clot as judged by immunostaining with
rhodamin-labeled phalloidin (Fig. 3, B and C).
The proportion of vinculin-positive but F-actin-negative bacteria to
that of vinculin and F-actin-positive bacteria decreased as the
infection period increased, and at 80 min after infection only ~10%
(11 ± 5%, n = 142, Fig. 3, E and
F) of vinculin-positive bacteria were actin-negative. Under
the same conditions, infecting bacteria expressing VirG3 variant (M94
carrying pD10-virG3) displayed accumulation of vinculin over
the whole bacterial body (Fig. 3H). Similarly, at 20 min
post-infection ~50% (49 ± 5%, n = 138) of the
vinculin-positive bacteria of M94 carrying pD10-1VirG3 did not have a
detectable actin assembly on the bacterial surface, and at 80 min
post-infection only ~10% (16 ± 12%, n = 114)
of vinculin-positive bacteria lacking actin assembly. The other VirG
variants, VirG1, VirG2, and VirG4, were unable to accumulate vinculin
(data not shown). Thus, these results suggest that the bacteria
expressing VirG elicit asymmetric vinculin accumulation in infected
cells, which is followed by F-actin assembly, and that the N-terminal
two-thirds of the -domain, corresponding to amino acids 104-506 is
necessary for accumulation of vinculin as well as for assembly of
F-actin.
Interaction between VirG and Vinculin in Xenopus Eggs
Extracts
To investigate the possible interaction of vinculin with
the -domain of VirG, we used cytoplasmic extracts of
X. laevis eggs, since this has been shown to
support the actin-based motility of S. flexneri in a manner
similar to that of infected mammalian cells (18, 19). For this purpose,
we constructed a plasmid encoding a GST-VirG -domain fusion protein
using PCR. The resulting plasmid (pGEX- 1) encoded the -domain
(VirG amino acids 53-758) and an additional 21 amino acids of the
N-terminal -core (Fig. 4), and was affinity purified
using a glutathione-Sepharose column. Subsequently, Xenopus
egg extracts prepared according to the methods described by Theriot
et al. (26) were incubated with glutathione-Sepharose
ligated to GST- 1, and the proteins bound to the GST- 1 fusion
protein were examined by SDS-PAGE. Although numerous proteins bound to
the GST- 1 fusion protein as detected by Coomassie Blue staining,
immunoblotting with the anti-chicken vinculin monoclonal antibody
revealed that the 120-kDa vinculin protein bound to GST- 1 (Fig.
5B, lane 1) but not to GST itself (lane
7). Numerous proteins were also observed to bind to the GST
protein itself using the same Xenopus egg extracts,
indicating those were nonspecifically bound proteins. To further
investigate whether or not the observed vinculin binding was specific
for the -domain portion which we had defined as the portion required
for eliciting a vinculin clot in infected cells (see Fig. 1), a series
of plasmids encoding various VirG -domain portions were constructed
in a similar manner to pGEX- 1. The resulting plasmids were
designated pGEX- 2 to pGEX- 6; pGEX- 2 encoded the -domain but
lacked VirG amino acids 104-319, pGEX- 3 encoded VirG amino acids
53-506, pGEX- 4 encoded VirG amino acids 53-319, pGEX- 5 encoded
VirG amino acids 320-507, and pGEX- 6 encoded VirG amino acids
53-101 (Fig. 4). The GST- -domain variants expressed from each of
the plasmids were purified using a glutathione-Sepharose affinity
column, then checked for size variation by SDS-PAGE (Fig.
5A) and immunoblotting with anti-GST antibody (see below).
The Xenopus egg extracts were incubated with
glutathione-Sepharose ligated to each of the GST- -domain variants,
and the proteins bound were again examined in the same manner as above.
As shown in Fig. 5B, the 120-kDa protein identified as
vinculin bound to GST- 1 and GST- 3, but not to the other
constructs, is in good agreement with our data showing that bacteria
expressing wild-type VirG or VirG3 variant elicited vinculin
accumulation in infected cells (Fig. 3).
Fig. 4.
Schematic representation of the construction
of GST- -domain fusion proteins and summary of vinculin binding
assays. GST was fused to truncated portions of the VirG -domain
using the pGEX-2T bacterial expression vector. A diagram indicating the
extent of the vinculin-binding domain is shown at the bottom
of the figure.
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]
Fig. 5.
In vitro association of
Xenopus vinculin with GST- -domain variants immobilized
on glutathione-Sepharose beads. A, Coomassie Blue staining
of purified GST- -domain fusion proteins fractionated by SDS-PAGE (2 µg/lane). B, immunoblot of vinculin associated
GST- -domain variants. Oocyte extracts (100 µl) were incubated with
immobilized fusion proteins (20 µg). Proteins bound to the beads were
subsequently washed, subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with
anti-chicken vinculin monoclonal antibody VIN 11-5, which cross-reacts
with Xenopus vinculin.
[View Larger Version of this Image (37K GIF file)]
Vinculin Head Binds to VirG
Vinculin has two principal
domains, an N-terminal globular head and an elongated C-terminal tail
(31). Recently, Johnson and Craig (32) identified an intramolecular
interaction between the head and tail domains of vinculin, and found
that the tail has an actin-binding site, while the head has an
talin-binding site, but showed that the head-tail interaction normally
masks these sites in the purified protein. Thus, to confirm the ability
of vinculin to interact with VirG and further investigate its
interactions with the head and tail part, we purified vinculin from
chicken gizzard according to methods previously reported (27) and
tested it for its ability to directly bind to the -domain of VirG.
After incubation of the purified vinculin together with each of the
GST- -domain variants in a buffer for 3 h at room temperature,
the GST- -domain variants were collected using glutathione-Sepharose
beads and bound proteins analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-chicken
vinculin antibody. In agreement with the above results, vinculin bound
specifically to GST- 1 and GST- 3 but not to the other
GST- -domain variants (Fig. 6A).
Subsequently, we cleaved vinculin with V8 protease (28, 29), and the
resulting 95-kDa head and 30-kDa tail portions were incubated with
GST- 1, GST- 3, and GST under the same conditions, and the bound
vinculin portions examined by immunoblotting with anti-vinculin head or
anti-vinculin tail monoclonal antibody. As shown in Fig. 6B,
the vinculin head, but not the tail, bound to GST- 1 and GST- 3
(see ``Discussion''). These data, together with the analysis of the
-domain portion required for recruitment of vinculin or F-actin on
intracellular Shigella indicated that at least the
N-terminal portion of VirG corresponding to amino acids 104-506 was
necessary for binding to vinculin, and that the vinculin binding
-domain portion coincided with the portion required for assembly
of F-actin.
Fig. 6.
Direct binding of the 95-kDa head part of
chicken gizzard vinculin to GST- 1 and -2 fusions. Each of 0.5 µM purified chicken gizzard vinculin (A),
95-kDa head, and (B) 30-kDa tail were incubated with 2.5 µM of GST- -domain variants, and precipitated with
glutathione-Sepharose. Pellets were washed and subjected to SDS-PAGE
and immunoblotting using anti-95 kDa head-specific monoclonal antibody
VIN 11-5 or 30-kDa tail-specific monoclonal antibody 4-21 (upper
panels) and rabbit anti-GST antibody (lower panels). In
the case of the 30-kDa tail binding assay, the supernatant of the
reaction mixture with GST- 1 was also subjected to immunoblotting as
a control. The reactivity of monoclonal antibody VIN 11-5 against
purified 95-kDa head on the blotted nitrocellulose was same as the
intact vinculin (data not shown). Bands smaller than the 95-kDa head
were copurified with head protein, and are probably further digested
products of V8 protease (28).
[View Larger Version of this Image (50K GIF file)]
DISCUSSION
In this study, we have attempted to delineate the role of the
different portions of VirG -domain in the actin-based motility of
S. flexneri, and reached the following conclusions: (i) the
C-terminal ~220 amino acids of the -domain are essential for
unipolar deposition of VirG on the bacterial surface, (ii) the
N-terminal two-thirds portion of the -domain is required for
assembly of F-actin on the bacterial surface in infected cells, (iii)
VirG deposition on bacteria in infected cells elicits accumulation of
vinculin at the same site, (iv) vinculin can interact with the
two-thirds portion of the N-terminal -domain in vivo and
in vitro conditions, and (v) the vinculin head part is
involved in the binding to VirG.
One of the VirG properties required for eliciting actin-based motility
of Shigella in infected cells is an asymmetric distribution
on the bacterial surface (8). Indeed, recent studies have shown that
the rfa or galU mutant of S. flexneri,
displaying a deep rough surface, has an aberrant distribution of VirG,
unlike the asymmetric distribution on the wild-type bacterium (16, 17).
Consequently, those bacterial strains displayed the protein in a
circumference tail fashion, rendering them defective in intercellular
spreading. Similarly, when VirG was expressed at a very high level in a
S. flexneri strain using a ptac-virG
plasmid (14), the bacteria displayed aberrant surface distribution of
VirG on the bacterial body, and became covered with F-actin around the
surface in infected cells and defective in the intercellular
spreading.2 Therefore, it is likely that a high level of
surface-exposed VirG expression on Shigella results in a
less defined asymmetry of VirG on the bacterial surface (20). In this
study, we confirmed that the asymmetry of VirG distribution is an
essential attribute for actin-based motility of Shigella in
infected cells, since M94 (S. flexneri
virG::Tn5) carrying pD10-1virG3
(the VirG variant lacking amino acids 509-729), deposited VirG3 on the
whole bacterial surface, leading to it becoming covered with F-actin
and consequently defective in intercellular spreading. In contrast, the
same bacteria expressing the VirG1 or VirG2 variant proteins possessing
the C-terminal -domain portion (see Fig. 1) showed asymmetric
distribution like wild-type VirG, but no longer elicited F-actin
assembly. To eliminate the possibility of the VirG -core to
contributing to the unipolar distribution of VirG, we investigated
bacteria expressing a PhoA- -core fusion protein, in which the
-domain was replaced with PhoA, an E. coli alkaline
phosphatase (12), for distribution of the fusion protein on the
bacterial surface. Immunostaining with an anti-PhoA antibody revealed
that the whole bacterial body was covered with PhoA.2 We
therefore conclude that VirG -core, the outer membrane embedded VirG
portion, is not directly involved in VirG distribution on the bacterial
surface, but rather, that it is the preceding ~220 amino acids in the
-domain which contribute to asymmetric VirG distribution.
To date several proteins such as vinculin, plastin (fimbrin), and
filamin have been reported to be associated with the F-actin tail
generated by intracellular S. flexneri (7, 9), although the
precise role of each protein in this process still remains to be
elucidated at the molecular level. Vinculin, a protein linked to focal
adhesions, has been shown to associate with the whole bacterial body
within protrusions and the full-length of the F-actin tail as far as
the protrusions (9). Plastin, an actin cross-linking protein, has been
shown to be incorporated into the actin tail behind the bacterial body,
thus contributing to the formation of a tight actin bundle (7).
Filamin, an actin gelation protein, was shown to be weakly associated
with the entire length of the F-actin tail (7). Among these proteins,
vinculin was of particular interest to us, since, in addition to the
above report (9), vinculin locates at focal adhesions and adhesion
junctions, where it is thought to mediate attachment of actin filaments
to integrin via talin or -actinin (21, 33). Recent studies indicated
that vinculin consists of two distinct domains, the N-terminal 95-kDa
head and C-terminal 30-kDa tail (28, 32), and that vinculin binding to
actin is mediated by the tail part, while the binding to talin is
mediated by the head part (28, 32). We thus wondered if the
accumulation of F-actin and vinculin elicited around the VirG clot at
one pole of the bacterium in infected cells could be a consequence of
direct interaction of vinculin with VirG, analogous to vinculin binding
to talin (28). To pursue the possible interaction between VirG and
vinculin, we performed time course studies on VirG-vinculin-actin
triple-labeled cells infected with bacteria expressing wild-type VirG
or VirG3 variant. The recruitment of vinculin on the bacterial surface
was confined to the site of VirG expression, and reorganization of
vinculin on the bacterium appeared prior to the assembly of F-actin as
seen in infected cells after 20 to 80 min of infection (Fig. 3). That a
similar phenomenon occurred with intracellular S. flexneri
was also stated by Kadurugamuwa et al. (9). These results
were consistent with the observation by Geiger et al. (34),
who suggested that focal adhesions and the associated vinculin serve as
organizing centers for the assembly of actin-containing microfilament
bundles.
The potential ability of vinculin to bind to VirG was investigated by
two different approaches: the first was checking if vinculin in
X. laevis egg extracts bound to VirG, and the
second was the demonstration of direct binding of chicken gizzard
vinculin to VirG. Since the Xenopus egg extracts have
previously been shown to support actin-based motility of E. coli expressing VirG (18, 19), we attempted to identify vinculin
as a protein bound to VirG, and found that the GST- 1 and GST- 3
fusion proteins were bound by a 120-kDa protein which was subsequently
identified as vinculin by immunoblotting with anti-chicken vinculin
antibody (Fig. 5). Furthermore, chicken gizzard vinculin was shown to
directly bind to the GST- 1 and GST- 3 fusion proteins. These data
are thus comparable to the results that the two-thirds portion of the
N-terminal -domain is required for vinculin accumulation on
Shigella in infected cells.
The two-thirds N-terminal portion contains at least eight repetitive
sequences rich in Gly (see Fig. 1) (12). According to our preliminary
data, the Gly-rich repeats seem to be a component of VirG involved in
eliciting F-actin assembly on Shigella in infected cells.
Bacteria expressing a VirG variant lacking the first Gly-rich repeat
proximal to the N terminus of the -domain (corresponding to VirG
amino acids 104 to 158), resulted in a significantly shorter F-actin
tail than that produced by the wild-type VirG. Furthermore, bacteria
expressing another VirG variant lacking the first two Gly-rich repeats
(corresponding to VirG amino acids 104 to 226), completely failed to
elicit F-actin assembly.2 Interestingly, the ActA protein
of Listeria monocytogenes and the IactA protein of
Listeria ivanovii, required for actin-based motility in
infected cells, possess four and seven Pro-rich repeats in the middle
of each polypeptide, respectively (35, 36). Those repeats are essential
for the bacteria to elicit full F-actin assembly in mammalian cells
(37), since bacteria expressing an ActA variant lacking the Pro-rich
repeats lost their ability to elongate the F-actin tail (37).
Chakraborty et al. (39) found that the Pro-rich repeat
domains are bound by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, a novel
protein associated with focal adhesions and able to interact with
microfilaments (38), and showed that the binding is required for the
elongation of F-actin at one pole of the bacterium in infected cells
(39), although the precise role of vasodilator-stimulated
phosphoprotein in eliciting F-actin assembly on Listeria in
infected cells still remains to be ascertained. In their study, they
noted that vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein was able to associate
with actin tail from intracellular S. flexneri, but were
unable to detect direct binding to VirG in an in vitro
study. Therefore, it is less likely that the virG -domain portion
containing Gly-rich repeats plays a role in recruitment of F-actin via
vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, but rather, contributes to
recruitment of F-actin through interaction with another protein, such
as vinculin, able to directly bind to F-actin.
The above scenario may be possible, since we have observed in this
study that the 95-kDa vinculin head part binds specifically to VirG.
Indeed, when the vinculin head and the tail parts were obtained from
intact vinculin by digestion with V8 protease, only the head part bound
to the GST- 1 or GST- 3 (Fig. 6B). In that experiment,
we noted differing affinities of the intact vinculin molecule and the
vinculin head part to VirG, since when equivalent moles of intact
vinculin and the head part were incubated with GST- 1 or GST- 3,
the amount of bound intact vinculin was significantly lower compared to
the bound vinculin head as determined by immunoblots (see Fig. 6,
A and B). These differences were reproducible
among experiments. This was thus reminiscent of the recent studies by
Johnson and Craig (28, 32) who demonstrated that an intramolecular
interaction between the head and tail part of vinculin masks the site
in the purified protein responsible for the binding to talin and actin.
Although we must be careful in drawing our conclusions, it is tempting
to speculate that the observed differing affinities between the intact
vinculin and the head part to VirG could result from the separation of
the vinculin head from the intact vinculin with V8 protease. As
suggested by previous study, the intramolecular interaction of vinculin
can be prevented through the interaction between vinculin and talin
(28). In this regard, although there is no significant similarity
between the amino acids of the -domain and talin (40), a
conformational change in vinculin evoked upon interaction with VirG may
promote the interaction of vinculin with F-actin near the bacterial
surface in infected cells. Alternatively, an intracellular signal
evoked by the infection of Shigella may cause a
conformational change in the vinculin molecule such as by binding with
tyrosine-phosphorylated paxillin or
phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (41, 42, 43), which may lead to the
binding of the vinculin tail to F-actin (44).
A previous study revealed that a 95-kDa processed form of VirG released
from S. flexneri, corresponding to the -domain, can
interact with F-actin along the actin tail in the infected cells (8).
However, this was recently shown to be the consequence of
cross-reactivity of the VirG monoclonal antibody with another as yet
uncharacterized 70-kDa host protein associated with the F-actin tail
(15). Since there has been no conclusive evidence supporting the
ability of VirG to directly interact with F-actin (20), it is thus not
probable that VirG can directly recruit F-actin assembly on the
bacterial surface in infected cells, but rather, that the recruitment
of F-actin by VirG is mediated by an actin-binding protein such as
vinculin as proposed in Fig. 7. In any case, further
studies must be awaited to discover the precise role of vinculin-VirG
interaction in actin-based motility of Shigella in infected
mammalian cells.
Fig. 7.
A possible model for recruitment of F-actin
assembly on the surface-exposed VirG moiety on Shigella in
infected cells. VirG -domain exposed on the bacterial surface
recruits vinculin, and this may lead to unmasking of the intramolecular
vinculin head-tail interaction (32). The vinculin tail portion could
then interact with F-actin or/and other signaling molecules (21, 44).
Multimerization of vinculin may occur through self-association or
localized accumulation of VirG, which may promote cross-linking actin
filaments (31, 32).
[View Larger Version of this Image (11K GIF file)]
FOOTNOTES
*
This work was supported by Research Fellowships of the Japan
Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists and a
Grant-in-aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of
Education, Science, Sports and Culture. The costs of publication of this
article were defrayed in part by the
payment of page charges. The article
must therefore be hereby marked
``advertisement'' in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section
1734 solely to indicate this fact.
§
To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Bacteriology,
Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, 4-6-1, Shirokanedai,
Minato-ku, Tokyo 108, Japan. Tel.: 81-3-5449-5252; Fax: 81-3-5449-5405 E-mail: sasakawa{at}ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
1
The abbreviations used are: PCR, polymerase
chain reaction; bp, base pair(s); GST, glutathione
S-transferase; FITC, fluorescein-isothiocyanate; PAGE,
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
2
T. Suzuki, unpublished results.
Acknowledgments
We thank S. W. Craig, S. Imajoh-Ohmi, K. Fukami, and R. Miyamoto for many valuable suggestions, J. Wehland and
B. Gerstel for helpful discussions, S. Funato and Y. Toyawa for help
with confocal laser-scanning microscope, and R. A. Mac
Síomóin for critical reading of the manuscript.
REFERENCES
-
Makino, S.,
Sasakawa, C.,
Kamata, K.,
Kurata, T.,
Yoshikawa, M.
(1986)
Cell
46,
551-555
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bernardini, M. L.,
Mounier, J.,
D'Hauteville, H.,
Coquis-Rondon, M.,
Sansonetti, P. J.
(1989)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
86,
3867-3871
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lett, M.-C.,
Sasakawa, C.,
Okada, N.,
Sakai, T.,
Makino, S.,
Yamada, M.,
Komatsu, K.,
Yoshikawa, M.
(1989)
J. Bacteriol.
171,
353-359
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Clerc, P.,
Sansonetti, P. J.
(1987)
Infect. Immun.
55,
2681-2688
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dehio, C.,
Prévost, M.-C.,
Sansonetti, P. J.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2471-2482
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Watarai, M.,
Funato, S.,
Sasakawa, C.
(1996)
J. Exp. Med.
183,
991-999
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Prévost, M.-C.,
Lesourd, M.,
Arpin, F.,
Vernel, F.,
Mounier, J.,
Hellio, R.,
Sansonetti, P. J.
(1992)
Infect. Immun.
60,
4088-4099
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Goldberg, M. B.,
Barzu, O.,
Parsot, C.,
Sansonetti, P. J.
(1993)
J. Bacteriol.
175,
2189-2196
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kadurugamuwa, J. L.,
Rohde, M.,
Wehland, J.,
Timmis, K. N.
(1991)
Infect. Immun.
59,
3463-3471
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Allaoui, A.,
Mounier, J.,
Prévost, M.-C.,
Sansonetti, P. J.,
Parsot, C.
(1992)
Mol. Microbiol.
6,
1605-1616
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Suzuki, T.,
Murai, T.,
Fukuda, I.,
Tobe, T.,
Yoshikawa, M.,
Sasakawa, C.
(1994)
Mol. Microbiol.
11,
31-41
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Suzuki, T.,
Lett, M.-C.,
Sasakawa, C.
(1995)
J. Biol. Chem.
270,
30874-30880
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Nakata, N.,
Tobe, T.,
Fukuda, I.,
Suzuki, T.,
Komatsu, K.,
Yoshikawa, M.,
Sasakawa, C.
(1993)
Mol. Microbiol.
9,
459-468
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Fukuda, I.,
Suzuki, T.,
Munakata, H.,
Hayashi, N.,
Katayama, E.,
Yoshikawa, M.,
Sasakawa, C.
(1995)
J. Bacteriol.
177,
1719-1726
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hauteville, H.,
Lagelouse, R. D.,
Nato, F.,
Sansonetti, P. J.
(1996)
Infect. Immun.
64,
511-517
[Abstract]
-
Rajakumar, K.,
Jost, B. H.,
Sasakawa, C.,
Okada, N.,
Yoshikawa, M.,
Adler, B.
(1994)
J. Bacteriol.
176,
2362-2373
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sandlin, R. C.,
Lampel, K. A.,
Keasler, S. P.,
Goldberg, M. B.,
Stolzer, A. L.,
Maurelli, A. T.
(1995)
Infect. Immun.
63,
229-237
[Abstract]
-
Goldberg, M. B.,
Theriot, J. A.
(1995)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
92,
6572-6576
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kocks, C.,
Marchand, J.-B.,
Gouin, E.,
Hauteville, H.,
Sansonetti, P. J.,
Carlier, M.-F.,
Cossart, P.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
18,
413-423
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lasa, I.,
Cossart, P.
(1996)
Trends Cell Biol.
6,
109-114
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Clark, E. A.,
Brugge, J. S.
(1995)
Science
268,
233-239
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Saga, S.,
Hamaguchi, M.,
Hoshino, M.,
Kojima, K.
(1985)
Exp. Cell Res.
156,
45-56
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Watarai, M.,
Tobe, T.,
Yoshikawa, M.,
Sasakawa, C.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
2461-2470
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Clerc, P.,
Sansonetti, P. J.
(1987)
Infect. Immun.
55,
2681-2688
-
Smith, D. B.,
Johnson, K. S.
(1988)
Gene
(Amst.)
67,
31-40
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Theriot, J. A.,
Rosenblatt, J.,
Portnoy, D. A.,
Goldschmidt-Clermont, P. J.,
Mitchison, T. J.
(1994)
Cell
76,
505-517
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Feramisco, J. R.,
Burridge, K.
(1980)
J. Biol. Chem.
255,
1194-1199
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Johnson, R. P.,
Craig, S. W.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
12611-12619
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Groesch, M. E.,
Otto, J. J.
(1990)
Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton
15,
41-50
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Menkel, A. R.,
Kroemker, M.,
Bubeck, P.,
Ronsiek, M.,
Nikolai, G.,
Jockusch, B. M.
(1994)
J. Cell Biol.
126,
1231-1240
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Milam, L. M.
(1985)
J. Mol. Biol.
184,
543-545
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Johnson, R. P.,
Craig, S. W.
(1995)
Nature
373,
261-264
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lo, S. H.,
Weisberg, E.,
Chen, L. B.
(1994)
Bioessays
16,
817-823
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Geiger, B.,
Avnur, Z.,
Rinnerthaler, G.,
Hinssen, H.,
Small, V. J.
(1984)
J. Cell Biol.
99,
83S-91S
-
Kocks, C.,
Gouin, E.,
Tabouret, M.,
Berche, P.,
Ohayon, H.,
Cossart, P.
(1992)
Cell
68,
521-531
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gerstel, B.,
Gröbe, L.,
Pistor, S.,
Chakraborty, T.,
Wehland, J.
(1996)
Infect. Immun.
64,
1929-1936
[Abstract]
-
Lasa, I.,
David, V.,
Gouin, E.,
Marchand, J.-B.,
Cossart, P.
(1995)
Mol. Microbiol.
18,
425-436
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Reinhard, M.,
Giehl, K.,
Abel, K.,
Haffner, C.,
Jarchau, T.,
Hoppe, V.,
Jockusch, B. M.,
Walter, U.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
1583-1589
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Chakraborty, T.,
Ebel, F.,
Domman, E.,
Niebuhr, K.,
Gerstel, B.,
Pistor, S.,
Temm-Grove, C. J.,
Jockusch, B. M.,
Reinhard, M.,
Walter, U.,
Wehland, J.
(1995)
EMBO J.
14,
1314-1321
[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Rees, D. J. G.,
Ades, S. E.,
Singer, S. J.,
Hynes, R. O.
(1990)
Nature
347,
685-689
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wood, C. K.,
Turner, C. E.,
Jackson, P.,
Critchley, D. R.
(1994)
J. Cell Sci.
107,
709-717
[Abstract]
-
Fukami, K.,
Endo, T.,
Imamura, M.,
Takenawa, T.
(1994)
J. Biol. Chem.
269,
1518-1522
[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Johnson, R. P.,
Craig, S. W.
(1995)
Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.
210,
159-164
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Gilmore, A. P.,
Burrige, K.
(1995)
Nature
373,
197
[CrossRef][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. L. May and R. Morona
Mutagenesis of the Shigella flexneri Autotransporter IcsA Reveals Novel Functional Regions Involved in IcsA Biogenesis and Recruitment of Host Neural Wiscott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein
J. Bacteriol.,
July 1, 2008;
190(13):
4666 - 4676.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. N. Schroeder and H. Hilbi
Molecular Pathogenesis of Shigella spp.: Controlling Host Cell Signaling, Invasion, and Death by Type III Secretion
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.,
January 1, 2008;
21(1):
134 - 156.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. Purdy, C. R. Fisher, and S. M. Payne
IcsA Surface Presentation in Shigella flexneri Requires the Periplasmic Chaperones DegP, Skp, and SurA
J. Bacteriol.,
August 1, 2007;
189(15):
5566 - 5573.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ogawa, T. Yoshimori, T. Suzuki, H. Sagara, N. Mizushima, and C. Sasakawa
Escape of Intracellular Shigella from Autophagy
Science,
February 4, 2005;
307(5710):
727 - 731.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
G. E. Purdy, M. Hong, and S. M. Payne
Shigella flexneri DegP Facilitates IcsA Surface Expression and Is Required for Efficient Intercellular Spread
Infect. Immun.,
November 1, 2002;
70(11):
6355 - 6364.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. B. Goldberg
Actin-Based Motility of Intracellular Microbial Pathogens
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.,
December 1, 2001;
65(4):
595 - 626.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Suzuki and C. Sasakawa
Molecular Basis of the Intracellular Spreading of Shigella
Infect. Immun.,
October 1, 2001;
69(10):
5959 - 5966.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Charles, M. Perez, J. H. Kobil, and M. B. Goldberg
Polar targeting of Shigella virulence factor IcsA in Enterobacteriacae and Vibrio
PNAS,
July 24, 2001;
(2001)
171310498.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. R. Henderson and J. P. Nataro
Virulence Functions of Autotransporter Proteins
Infect. Immun.,
March 1, 2001;
69(3):
1231 - 1243.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Egile, T. P. Loisel, V. Laurent, R. Li, D. Pantaloni, P. J. Sansonetti, and M.-F. Carlier
Activation of the CDC42 Effector N-WASP by the Shigella flexneri IcsA Protein Promotes Actin Nucleation by Arp2/3 Complex and Bacterial Actin-based Motility
J. Cell Biol.,
September 20, 1999;
146(6):
1319 - 1332.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Heinzen, S. S. Grieshaber, L. S. Van Kirk, and C. J. Devin
Dynamics of Actin-Based Movement by Rickettsia rickettsii in Vero Cells
Infect. Immun.,
August 1, 1999;
67(8):
4201 - 4207.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Suzuki, H. Mimuro, H. Miki, T. Takenawa, T. Sasaki, H. Nakanishi, Y. Takai, and C. Sasakawa
Rho Family GTPase Cdc42 Is Essential for the Actin-based Motility of Shigella in Mammalian Cells
J. Exp. Med.,
June 6, 1999;
191(11):
1905 - 1920.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Charles, J. Magdalena, J. A. Theriot, and M. B. Goldberg
Functional Analysis of a Rickettsial OmpA Homology Domain of Shigella flexneri IcsA
J. Bacteriol.,
February 1, 1999;
181(3):
869 - 878.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E Gouin, H Gantelet, C Egile, I Lasa, H Ohayon, V Villiers, P Gounon, P. Sansonetti, and P Cossart
A comparative study of the actin-based motilities of the pathogenic bacteria Listeria monocytogenes, Shigella flexneri and Rickettsia conorii
J. Cell Sci.,
January 6, 1999;
112(11):
1697 - 1708.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. C. Sandlin and A. T. Maurelli
Establishment of Unipolar Localization of IcsA in Shigella flexneri 2a Is Not Dependent on Virulence Plasmid Determinants
Infect. Immun.,
January 1, 1999;
67(1):
350 - 356.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Cersini, A. M. Salvia, and M. L. Bernardini
Intracellular Multiplication and Virulence of Shigella flexneri Auxotrophic Mutants
Infect. Immun.,
February 1, 1998;
66(2):
549 - 557.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. O. Laine, W. Zeile, F. Kang, D. L. Purich, and F. S. Southwick
Vinculin Proteolysis Unmasks an ActA Homolog for Actin-based Shigella Motility
J. Cell Biol.,
September 22, 1997;
138(6):
1255 - 1264.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Mimuro, T. Suzuki, S. Suetsugu, H. Miki, T. Takenawa, and C. Sasakawa
Profilin Is Required for Sustaining Efficient Intra- and Intercellular Spreading of Shigella flexneri
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 8, 2000;
275(37):
28893 - 28901.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Charles, M. Perez, J. H. Kobil, and M. B. Goldberg
Polar targeting of Shigella virulence factor IcsA in Enterobacteriacae and Vibrio
PNAS,
August 14, 2001;
98(17):
9871 - 9876.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 1996 by the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.
|
Advertisement
Advertisement
|