|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Received for publication, April 19, 1996, and in revised form, June 25, 1996)
From We have used a combinatorial mutagenesis strategy
to humanize BR96, a monoclonal antibody that binds to the Lewis Y class
of tumor antigens. This approach allows simultaneous assessment of
hundreds of humanized variable regions to identify the molecules that
best preserve affinity, thus overcoming the major drawback of current
humanization procedures, the requirement to construct and analyze each
humanized antibody separately. Murine residues of BR96 were mutated to
human if they were solvent-exposed residues that did not participate in
the formation of the antigen binding site and were not at the interface
of the light and heavy chain. At positions that might be involved in
binding to antigen, the choice between the murine and human residue was
more difficult. Murine and human alternatives were incorporated into a
combinatorial library at positions representing buried residues that
might affect the structural integrity of the antigen binding site. By
encoding this library of humanized BR96 Fabs in an M13 phage vector, we
rapidly identified several candidates with nearly identical antigen
binding, within 2-fold, of the chimeric Fab. Additional mutagenesis
directed at sites suggested in the literature as potentially important
for antigen binding in a similar anti-Lewis Y antibody yielded no
further improvements.
The human immune response to antigenic sequences in rodent
monoclonal antibodies (mAbs)1 has limited
the therapeutic use of these proteins (1, 2). The creation of chimeric
antibodies with the foreign variable regions (V regions) joined to
human constant regions (3, 4, 5) has addressed this limitation, in part.
Many chimeric antibodies, however, continue to induce an immune
response directed to the foreign V regions (6, 7), and the
immunogenicity of a given V region in humans is not predictable at
present. The desire to further minimize the potential for
immunogenicity of any xenogeneic V region has motivated the development
of several methods for ``humanizing'' an antibody. ``Humanization''
involves changing foreign framework residues rare in human V region
sequences to residues more commonly found. The involvement of
complementarity determining regions (CDRs) in antigen binding generally
requires preservation of these sequences.
Winter and colleagues (8, 9, 10) first described a method for transferring
the specificity of a murine antibody by grafting its CDRs onto human
framework regions. The simple grafting of CDRs onto human frameworks,
however, often results in significantly reduced affinity for antigen
(9, 11). Although humanization is straightforward in principle, in
practice alterations at framework residues, particularly those
interacting with CDRs, frequently affect antigen binding. Analysis of
antibody-antigen complexes by x-ray crystallography has shown that some
framework residues can interact directly with antigen (12), affect the
conformation of the CDR loops (11, 13, 14), and influence packing
interactions between the These humanization methods generally require an iterative approach to
create, characterize, and correct, if necessary, the sequence of a
humanized V region. Even as our understanding of antibody structure
increases and more information is available regarding positions that
predominantly affect ligand binding, it remains difficult to generalize
the approach. Designing a humanized antibody requires making choices of
which residues to change and which to retain. Making these decisions is
often subjective, but creating a set of humanized molecules that
represents all of the alternatives at positions where the choice is
difficult reduces the degree of subjectivity. Simultaneously
determining the binding activity of the many different humanized forms
contained in such a set or ``library'' reduces or eliminates the need
to rely on a trial and error strategy.
We have humanized the anticarcinoma mAb BR96 by a combinatorial library
design strategy that created a set of humanized V regions from which
sequences that best preserved affinity were rapidly selected. BR96
recognizes a tumor-associated antigen expressing a Lewis Y
(Ley) related carbohydrate on the surface of many human
carcinomas (23, 24). An immunoconjugate of chimeric BR96 with
doxorubicin induces complete regressions and cures of human tumor
xenografts growing in athymic mice (25). The chimeric BR96
immunoconjugate is currently in human clinical trials. We have
constructed an M13 phage Fab expression library containing combinations
of human and murine residues at several positions among those selected
for humanization of BR96. In this report we discuss the design of a
humanized BR96 library and the selection and characterization of
several humanized BR96 Fabs from it. In addition, we compare our
humanization procedure and results with those of Benhar et
al. (20), who humanized B3, another anti-Ley mAb (26)
that has a highly homologous sequence to BR96 (27).
Human
immunoglobulin sequences were identified from several protein data
bases, GenBankTM, EMBL, SwissProt, and PIR, by the
Stringsearch program of the GCG Package (Sequence Analysis Software
Package, Genetics Computer Group, Inc., Madison, WI). To compare the
human sequences to BR96 V regions we used the FastA program (28)
adapted for the GCG package. We selected the human germline light and
heavy chain sequences with the highest degree of homology with the BR96
framework regions 1, 2, and 3 of each chain by evaluating variable
domain sequence profiles as described previously (29).
BR96
variable domain heavy and light chain gene sequences and the
corresponding selected human sequences were aligned, and CDR loop
assignments were made according to the canonical structure model
described by Chothia and Lesk (30). The structure-based CDR loop
assignments of Chothia and Lesk (30) spatially delineate the binding
site better than the sequence-defined hypervariable regions of Kabat
et al. (31). Sequence numbering and framework region
alignments were according to Kabat et al. (31). Differences
in residues between BR96 and selected human germline templates were
mapped on a three-dimensional model of the BR96 variable regions (32).
From the model we identified residues important (13) or potentially
important to the interface of the heavy chain and light chain V regions
or to the integrity of the antigen binding site. The selected human
framework sequences were then inspected for conservation of buried
(``packing'') residues as defined by Padlan (33). Considering the
modeling information and identification of buried residues, we made
decisions to retain a murine residue, change it to the human
counterpart, or include both the human and murine alternatives in the
combinatorial library.
Oligonucleotides were synthesized
and purified as described elsewhere (34). Synthesis of oligonucleotides
incorporated a 1:1 mixture of murine codons to human codons at the
selected library positions (35). The oligonucleotide mixtures were
double-deprotected with concentrated NH4OH, purified by
polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and eluted from the excised gel
slices (36).
The molecule chosen for humanization
was a mutant of chimeric BR96, M1, that contains an Asp to Ala mutation
at heavy chain position 97 resulting in an increased affinity for tumor
antigen (34). We generated de novo full-length humanized V
region genes from long overlapping oligonucleotides for insertion into
an M13 Fab expression vector by hybridization mutagenesis (35, 37). We
included codons for the murine and human alternatives at library
positions in the synthesis of the humanized V region oligonucleotides,
rather than create the combinatorial library after the V regions were
incorporated into the phage vector (34). The full-length humanized V
region single-stranded DNAs required for hybridization mutagenesis were
synthesized in a two-step polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Annealing
PCR primers had at least 18 nucleotide residues complementary to vector
sequences for efficient annealing of the single-stranded V region
products to the vector. Equimolar concentrations of the annealing PCR
primers and of six (light chain) or seven (heavy chain) overlapping
60-80 nucleotide sequences were amplified to generate double-stranded
DNA. From the double-stranded products single-stranded DNA was prepared
by asymmetric PCR. The oligonucleotides for the light and heavy chains
with the sites of library positions underlined are as
follows. Light chain oligonucleotides were forward primer (5 The PCR reaction (50 µl) for each chain contained 50 pmol each of
oligonucleotides 1-6 (light chain) or oligonucleotides 1-7 (heavy
chain), and the respective forward (5 Escherichia coli strain XL-1 was
transfected by electroporation with 1 µl of the mutagenesis reaction
and incubated at 37 °C until plaques had formed. Plaque lift assays
were performed as described using 2 µg/ml synthetic Ley
tetrasaccharide hydrazide (sLey) (Alberta Research Council
(ARC), Edmonton, Alberta, Canada) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase
(sLey-HRP) as a probe (34). Phage clones reactive with
sLey were used to infect cultures of E. coli
strain MK30-3 (Boehringer Mannheim) for the production of soluble Fab
fragments. To characterize each humanized Fab we prepared periplasmic
fractions, performed quantitative and antigen binding ELISAs with
paraformaldehyde fixed tumor cells or tumor cell membranes, and
conducted surface plasmon resonance (SPR) experiments as described
previously (34). As a control for ELISA and SPR experiments, BR96 Fab
was prepared by proteolytic digestion of chimeric BR96 with papain
using the ImmunoPure® Fab Preparation Kit (Pierce) according to the
manufacturer's instructions.
Single-stranded DNA from humanized
BR96 clones was isolated, and the heavy and light chain V region genes
were sequenced by the dideoxynucleotide termination method (Sequenase
Version 2, U. S. Biochemical Corp., Cleveland, OH).
Site-directed mutagenesis to
correct PCR errors or to introduce additional specific single codon
changes was performed essentially as described by Kunkel et
al. (40). The template for site-directed experiments was
uridinylated single-stranded DNA from humanized Fab clone (2-40)
with two affinity mutations. This affinity mutant, designated M3, had
mutations in CDR2 (Gly53 To design the humanized BR96 framework V region we
selected a set of human germline sequences from a homology search of
available immunoglobulin V region sequences. Because framework residues
can influence the conformation of the antigen binding site, we chose
human frameworks closely resembling that of murine BR96 (mBR96) to
maximize the probability they would provide similar structural support
of the CDR loops. We preferred germline sequences for templates rather
than same or higher scoring non-germline sequences, because of the
unknown contribution of somatic mutations to immunogenicity. Since most
light and heavy chain combinations assemble correctly, we chose the
most homologous templates for each chain independently. The chosen
human heavy chain V region, locus HSIGDP51 (accession no. Z12351[GenBank]),
subgroup III, had 80% homology of frameworks 1, 2, and 3 to the BR96
heavy chain sequence (Fig. 1). The selection for the
light chain template was germline V region HSIGVA23 (accession no.
X12684[GenBank]), subgroup II, with 79% homology to the BR96 light chain
frameworks 1, 2, and 3 (Fig. 1). The most homologous J region segments
were JH4 for the heavy chain and Jk2 for the light chain.
The antibody humanized in these studies was BR96 M1, a mutant of BR96
with improved affinity resulting from one amino acid substitution in
CDR3 of the heavy chain (34). The heavy and light chain amino acid
sequences of BR96 M1 and human template sequences were aligned and
differences between the murine and human frameworks identified. We
inspected a BR96 model (32) to map the predicted spatial position of
each residue, and then decided whether to retain the murine residue, to
substitute the human residue, or to include both the murine and human
residues in the combinatorial library. We maintained the murine
residues at structural determinant positions (marked with # in Fig. 1)
that are responsible for the canonical loop conformations of an
antibody (13). The only structural determinant position in the
framework with a different residue in BR96 and the human template was
position 2 in the light chain (Fig. 1), and we retained the murine
residue valine. Examination of the model indicated that none of the
solvent exposed residues different between BR96 M1 and the human
template were likely to be important for maintaining the structure of
the antigen binding site. We chose to mutate all solvent exposed
residues, 11 residues in the light chain and 16 in the heavy chain, to
the human amino acids (Fig. 1).
The residues considered for library positions were buried amino acids
as defined by Padlan (33). Humanization of the anti-lysozyme antibody,
D1.3 (11) and of an anti-CD18 mAb, m1B4 (22) demonstrated the critical
nature of some buried residues. CDR grafting of D1.3 caused a 45-fold
decrease in its binding affinity. Changing four buried framework
residues back to the murine residues restored binding activity to
within 4-fold of the murine antibody. For humanized 1B4, recovery of a
3-fold loss of activity measured in an in vitro adhesion
assay occurred by changing three buried residues back to the murine
residues (22).
The BR96 library included buried residues at heavy chain and light
chain positions where the murine and human choices were between
nonconservative residues. In the heavy chain of BR96 four buried
positions differed between the murine (m) and human (h) template
sequences, position 20 (m = Val, h = Leu), 24 (m = Thr,
h = Ala), 49 (m = Ala, h = Ser), and 77 (m = Thr,
h = Ser). We included positions 24 and 49 (Table I)
in the library, since they are less conservative choices. The amino
acid choices at positions 20 and 77 were conservative and we chose to
humanize both. In addition, at position 20, the murine residue Val
rarely occurs in human VHIII sequences (less than 5%) (31). The fourth
potential library position, 77, is not proximal to a CDR loop and the
computer model suggested that neither the Thr (murine) nor Ser (human)
would affect CDR conformation.
Construction of combinatorial humanized BR96 M1 Fab library
Inspection of buried residues in the light chain V regions revealed different residues at six positions, position 2 (m = Thr, h = Ser), 11 (m = Leu, h = Ser), 36 (m = Tyr, h = Leu), 37 (m = Leu, h = Gln), 43 (m = Ser, h = Pro), and 104 (m = Leu, h = Val). As noted above we maintained the murine residue at position 2 of BR96 because this position is a canonical structural determinant for the L1 loop (13). Even though the two amino acid choices are conservative at position 104, we included this position in the combinatorial library since representation of Leu and Val in the human Jk2 segment is approximately equivalent in human J region sequences homologous to BR96. Therefore, the humanized antibody library incorporated the murine and human alternative amino acids at light chain positions 11, 36, 37, 43, and 104 and at heavy chain positions 24 and 49 (Table I). We constructed the combinatorial library of humanized BR96 M1 in an M13 Fab expression vector. De novo synthesis of the humanized V region genes by PCR amplification of long overlapping oligonucleotides was used so that all combinations of the alternatives at library positions were introduced in a single reaction. The single-stranded DNAs, produced by a second, asymmetric PCR, were incorporated into the uridinylated M13IX104 phage vector by hybridization mutagenesis (37, 39). Inclusion of codons for the murine and human alternatives at library positions into the oligonucleotides yielded PCR products representing all permutations. The resulting library contained 22 different heavy chains and 25 different light chains for a total of 128 variant humanized BR96 M1 Fab molecules. If desired, substantially larger libraries can be created by this method to examine alternate residues at many more positions. Selection and Characterization of Humanized BR96 FabsScreening of the combinatorial library by a nitrocellulose
filter lift assay identified phage expressing Fab that bound to the
sLey antigen, a synthetic tetrasaccharide we believe to
represent the minimal elements of the Ley antigen expressed
on tumor cells (41). This primary screen eliminates phage that do not
express or poorly express Fab fragments due to mutations introduced
into the library or by PCR error. We found that overlapping
oligonucleotide gene synthesis introduced deletion mutations, which we
also eliminated by this primary screen for function. The complexity of
this library is relatively small (128 members) compared to typical
combinatorial libraries constructed for affinity maturation or
discovery of new specificities (108-1011
members) (34, 42). Therefore, screening the library completely is
technically simpler. Even so, to ensure examination of each of the
mutant combinations among the background of nonproductive constructs we
screened several hundred phage plaques. We selected 150 clones with
strong staining in an sLey-HRP plaque lift to characterize
by ELISA on fixed H3396 tumor cells. Of those clones we chose 15 with
binding similar to the murine V region Fab parent to quantitatively
assess binding to antigen. The concentration of Fab fragments in
periplasmic fractions of infected E. coli cultures was
measured by ELISA, and the relative binding activities of each Fab was
assessed on H3396 tumor cell membranes. All the Fabs from the selected
clones bound to tumor antigen comparably to the parental murine BR96 M1
Fab. Binding of five representative humanized clones to H3396 tumor
membranes is shown in Fig. 2. The high affinity chimeric
BR96 mutant M1 has approximately 8-10-fold improved binding to tumor
antigen compared to the chimeric BR96 Fab (34) (Fig. 2). All five
clones selected from the humanized combinatorial library preserved this
improvement as assessed by ELISA.
Fig. 2. Binding of humanized BR96 Fabs to H3396 tumor cell membranes. Periplasmic fractions containing Fab were prepared from E. coli cultures infected with phage clones chosen from the humanized BR96 Fab combinatorial library or infected with parent BR96 M1 phage. The clones are designated by number. The concentration of Fab in a periplasmic preparation was measured in a quantitative ELISA (34). mBR96 Fab was proteolytically derived by papain digestion from whole chimeric BR96 immunoglobulin. For this figure and Fig. 4 the standard deviation of the duplicates at each data point is indicated by error bars, which are often smaller than the data point symbol.
These five humanized BR96 M1 Fabs were analyzed by SPR to compare their
dissociation rates from sLey (Table II).
Plasmon resonance measures the kinetic parameters of antibody-antigen
binding and yields a more sensitive measurement of binding activity
than the ELISA. Previous SPR studies with purified BR96 Fab and its
high affinity mutants showed that the difference in binding affinity
constants among the mutants was primarily a function of the
dissociation rate constant (koff) (34). The
koff for the humanized clones ranged from 0.069 s
Table III lists the amino acids found at each of the library positions in the five humanized clones. In the light chain, all five clones had the murine residue Tyr at 36 and the human residue Gln at 37. The murine residue Leu at position 37 does not affect binding activity, since another clone with similar activity to the five clones characterized in this study had Leu at that position (data not shown). Furthermore, introduction of Leu at 37 into a humanized clone by site-directed mutagenesis showed that the human residue Gln could be replaced without a loss of activity (data not shown). Sequencing identified both murine and human residues at light chain positions 11, 43, and 104 in different humanized clones. Clone 1-76 had Pro at light chain position 11, which is neither the murine nor human alternative, and it presumably resulted from a PCR error. Consequently, we are evaluating alternative polymerases such as Pfu and VentTM to eliminate errors introduced by Taq polymerase. At the heavy chain library positions, all clones selected had the human amino acid residues, Ala at position 24 and Ser at 49.
The clone chosen for further study, 2-40, had human template residues at five of the seven library positions. The murine residues at positions 36 and 43 in the light chain are present in the consensus sequence for approximately 50 of the most homologous human heavy chain sequences to BR96 (Fig. 1), diminishing our concern about potential immunogenicity. Furthermore, all framework residues in humanized BR96 are represented in the human template or subgroup consensus for both heavy and light chains except for position 2 in the light chain, a structural determinant residue we chose not to mutate in this study. We have subsequently compared the human Ile residue at position 2 to the murine Val and have shown that binding was equivalent in both cases (data not shown). Site-directed Mutagenesis of Humanized BR96A recent report
described the humanization of B3 (20), another mAb that recognizes the
Lewis Y class of tumor antigens (26). B3 and BR96 have highly
homologous light chain and heavy chain V region sequences, 96 and 85%,
respectively (27) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3. Alignment of murine and humanized BR96 sequences with murine and humanized B3 sequences and human templates for each. A, alignment of mBR96 light chain, hBR96 light chain, and human template HSIGVA23 with murine B3 (mB3) and humanized B3 (hB3) light chains, and human template, GM607 (20). B, alignment of mBR96 and hBR96 heavy chains and human template HSIGDP51 with mB3 and hB3 heavy chains and human template, 56P1 CL (20). Amino acids that are identical to the murine amino acid
are designated by a dash.
We compared the residues humanized in each antibody and particularly noted the positions in B3 identified as important to antigen binding. The humanized B3(Fv)-PE38 immunotoxin, as originally designed, showed a 20-fold loss in activity, but two site-specific changes resulted in substantial recovery of ligand binding and cytotoxicity (20). Mutation of Leu104 (murine) to Val104 (human) in the B3 light chain restored binding activity 8-fold. The authors suggested that humanization of light chain residues 15 and 18, both to Pro, required that 104 also be humanized. For the humanization of BR96, the combinatorial library included light chain position 104 with the same amino acid alternatives as for B3. We found that substitution of either amino acid at that position in humanized BR96 M1 did not affect antigen binding. BR96 has Leu at position 15 not Pro, which may account for greater flexibility to substitute residues at 104. An additional 2-fold recovery in binding of humanized B3 occurred by
replacing human residue Ser with the murine residue Arg at position 82b
in the heavy chain. In humanized BR96 we had also substituted the human
Ser for the murine Arg so we questioned whether changing the residue at
82b in BR96 might affect its binding activity. We changed the human
residue Ser back to the murine amino acid, Arg, at 82b by site-directed
mutagenesis. The clone used for this experiment was humanized BR96 M3,
a derivative of clone 2-40 with an additional affinity mutation, Gly to
Asp at 53 in the heavy chain (34). The return to the murine residue did
not alter binding to tumor (Fig. 4). The
koff measured by SPR was also unchanged (data
not shown).
Fig. 4. Binding of humanized BR96 M3 site-directed mutants to tumor cell membranes. Murine residues at positions 19 and 82b in the heavy chain were introduced into humanized BR96 M3 by site-directed mutagenesis. Binding of the Fab fragments in bacterial periplasm fractions to H3396 tumor membranes was compared by ELISA. mBR96 is proteolytically derived Fab prepared as described in Fig. 2.
Residue 19 of humanized B3 heavy chain fit the criteria that Benhar et al. (20) had established for humanization of B3. However, based upon their unpublished observations they suggested that mutations introduced at residue 19 resulted in substantial activity loss, and despite the conservative nature of the change (Lys to Arg), they retained the murine residue. We had chosen to humanize position 19 in BR96. To test whether this position affected antigen binding of humanized BR96, we changed the Arg back to the murine residue Lys. As shown in Fig. 4, changing the residue had no effect on binding activity. The koff of this molecule measured by SPR was similar to that of humanized BR96 M3 and the 82b site-directed mutant (data not shown). Thus, none of the positions that had or were suggested to have an impact on the humanization of B3 had a significant effect on humanized BR96 binding, despite the great sequence homology and similar antigen specificity of the two antibodies. Many ``humanized'' forms of a monoclonal antibody are possible. A compromise between humanizing a murine framework residue to reduce its potential immunogenicity and retaining a residue critical to antigen binding and specificity is often necessary. We have presented a combinatorial library strategy to examine murine and human alternative residues at positions potentially important for retaining antigen binding. Simultaneous evaluation of antigen binding of Fabs representing all combinations of selected residues eliminates repeated rounds of design and analysis frequently required to identify the ``most'' human sequence that maintains the best binding. Selection of the human frameworks to use as templates for humanization of foreign V regions defines subsequent decisions regarding which residues to humanize. Choosing homologous templates from antibodies with known crystal structure, from germline, non-germline, or consensus sequences derived from available data bases are options (for a review, see Routledge et al. (43)). As discussed in more detail below, the choice of templates for the light chains of BR96 and B3, germline template for BR96, and a non-germline sequence for B3, dictated that different residues be humanized in the two antibodies. Even though we chose germline sequences to eliminate potential immunogenicity of somatic mutations, no particular template selection method has proven superior to another regarding immunogenicity. Too few humanized antibodies have been administered clinically to provide sufficient data about the immunogenicity of humanized mAbs. A patient's immune response to solvent exposed residues of a mAb results in more rapid clearance of the mAb upon subsequent administrations (43). Therefore, we preferred to humanize all the solvent exposed residues to minimize immunogenicity. Although we wished to humanize as many residues as possible, we were hesitant to change residues at the light and heavy chain V region interface or adjacent to CDR loops, since they may affect antigen binding. Many of these amino acids are buried or ``packing'' residues (33) and are important to antigen binding (11, 22). Positions selected for the BR96 library included the buried positions for which the murine and human alternative amino acids represented nonconservative changes. A library strategy is advantageous because it can incorporate any position for which the choice of human or murine amino acid is ambiguous. General structural information compiled from crystallized antibodies, e.g. CDR loop conformation (13), identification of positions as high, medium, or low risk for humanization (44), degree of solvent exposure (33), or antibody-specific modeling information can be useful when deciding to retain the murine residue, change it to human, or incorporate it as a library position. Furthermore, rodent and human V regions share homology in CDR sequences, and future attempts at humanization could include selected CDR residues as well as framework residues. Humanization of buried residues did not adversely affect binding of BR96 to antigen. Several humanized BR96 M1 Fabs demonstrated binding activity comparable to the murine V region parent. In five clones sequenced, we found only the human residue at three positions, both human and murine residues at three positions, and only the murine residue at one position. The murine residue Tyr predominated at position 36 in the light chain and it also dominates in the human sequences homologous to BR96. This position is involved in the interface between the V regions of the heavy and light chains, and so it may not be permissive to change. The predominance of human residues at three positions was unexpected, but because we sequenced only five clones, we do not think that the data statistically prove an advantage of human over murine residues at these positions. While the binding activity of all selected clones was similar to mBR96 Fab, the expression of the humanized clones was higher in the bacteria. The humanized Fabs expressed in the bacterial periplasm all yielded 4-8-fold more Fab than typically found for the murine V region. The plaque lift assay used initially to select clones from the library is sensitive to expression level. The human residues that predominated in some clones could have affected their expression in bacteria, but we cannot distinguish whether library positions or the other humanized residues not included in the library caused this improvement. Application of a combinatorial strategy might also be useful solely to maximize protein expression, often an important issue in bacterial expression of mammalian proteins. The different approaches taken to humanize BR96 and B3 illustrate how template choice and form of an antibody can influence the outcome of the process. We chose germline sequences for humanization, whereas Benhar et al. (20) selected the most highly homologous templates without the same constraint from their data base search. The BR96 heavy chain framework has sufficient dissimilarity to B3 that the 46 human sequences most homologous to BR96 did not include the template used for B3. The light chains, on the other hand, have only three amino acid differences in the frameworks, and homologous sequences identified in our data base search did include the template for B3, GM607. If we had chosen GM607 as template, our choice of buried residues for the library would have been reduced to one, position 104. The different choice of templates not only determined library composition, but also led us to mutate a somewhat different set of solvent-exposed residues. Ultimately, the two humanized mAbs had greater divergence in sequence than the original murine antibodies. Humanization of B3(Fv)-PE38 as originally designed resulted in a molecule with a 20-fold loss in binding activity. By iterative design and analysis they identified the framework positions critical to recovery of binding activity. Despite the sequence similarity of B3 and BR96, humanization of positions or preservation of particular murine residues in BR96 was not critical to its activity. Because B3(Fv)-PE38 immunotoxin is a single-chain fusion protein isolated from inclusion bodies in E. coli and requires refolding, alterations to the amino acid sequence of the Fv could affect the refolding process. These amino acid substitutions might not affect BR96 similarly, since it is expressed as a soluble functional Fab. Humanization is an empirical process and many modifications of xenogeneic antibodies are conceivable that might fit a definition of humanized. In this report many humanized BR96 Fabs with varied humanized sequences that bound comparably to tumor antigen and without significant loss in affinity were rapidly identified. Combinatorial library strategy offers a flexible approach to the humanization of antibodies and to other protein engineering projects. * The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked ``advertisement'' in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. § To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 3005 First Ave., Seattle, WA 98121. Tel.: 206-727-3551; Fax: 206-727-3603.
Current address: Desmos, Inc., 3550 General Atomics Court, San
Diego, CA 92121.
'' Current address: Bristol-Myers Squibb, 3005 First Ave., Seattle, WA 98121. 1 The abbreviations used are: mAb, monoclonal antibody; V region, variable region; CDR, complementarity determining region; Ley, Lewis Y; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; sLey, synthetic Ley tetrasaccharide hydrazide; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; SPR, surface plasmon resonance; koff, dissociation rate constant; sFv, single chain variable fragment; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We thank John Emswiler and Wes Cosand for their contributions to the BIAcore experiments.
©1996 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. This article has been cited by other articles:
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Advertisement | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||